Added: 3 years ago
From: GamingApeTRAILERS
Views: 18,467
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1 dick gead :P

  • @JChoiSauce where do u see fluffy bunnies??????

  • this is bullshitt... they make 3 chapter for money!!! argh!! In starcraft 1 they make 3 in 1 that easier...

  • @ishard3 becouse lower graphics ???? ur so dump :D

  • @gaterin1998 Lol you're so dumb for spelling you're, dumb and because wrong.

  • It will be. SC2's terran campaign is supposed to be 20+ hours with only the regular missions

  • Well at least this doesnt surprise me, waiting for that company that won't devise ways to make money...still gonne be an awesome game

  • good news is i got beta

  • @NEdarkoPWNED same

  • If you want SC2 beta key just head to Starcraft2Keys(.)tk there is a guy who gives them away

  • ppl commenting retarded... you get all 3 in 1 game...--.--

  • trilogy of milking what should have been 1 sequel and perhaps an expansion

  • Im sure well gobble it up anyway, like a whore

  • greedy greedy blizzard.

  • @phils920 It's a business. At least it's not a monthly sub like shitty ass WoW

  • @westboarder imagine if they made a WoW out of Starcraft.

  • @Mifonerru Yeaaaaaahh. No Thanks. I like to play video games for fun, not as a part time job.

  • @westboarder lol and yet... if they do... most of us would probably quit our day jobs lol

  • Wings of Liberty? LOL

    What a generic shitty name

  • Fuck you. In the ear.

  • @gdbaradit ? u must be the most retarded person on youtube for sure dude u SUCK

  • if people have to buy the 3 seperately... big mistake and i'm just going to download it somewhere. but with the no cliffanger, sounds like the way Dynamix did Starsiege with two seperate campaigns, doing different things so they never crossed paths and you were able to end up with the same ending overall.

  • 1 game 3 mony... nice tactic: eat your heart out pro players hehe

  • what don't you understand in "nothing changes for multiplayer" ?

  • No, the first release will include all the races/options for the multiplayer mode...

  • anyone else realize that in the specific campaigns you get no practice with the other races other than online?

  • fluffy bunnis lmao

  • Its stupid if they only release 1 at a time or all 3 altogether casue Im not buying the 3 separately

  • lol XD your right :D

  • i hope they have a box set

  • Terran *cricket chirps*

    Zerg *riots in the street*

    Protoss *anarchy in the crowd*

  • how long in between each section being released? years or like 6 months?

  • 1 year. Think of them as expansions.

  • Yep!

  • This strategy to divide the game does give them the chance to make three times more money but it wastes like two times it. I don't mind at all this as long as they make one huge game that takes a long time to be surpassed in both length and quality by other future RTS's. When we play and finish the first one, we'll know if the rest is worth buying. If not, we'll stay with the multiplayer only. It might be expensive but it can also become the ultimate RTS experience so far. Think about it.

  • epic mi ass blizzard just want money

  • As the multiplayer doesn't change, I expect the expansions to be cheaper than the original SC.

  • I realy hope this trilogy thing isnt just a money grab.

  • isnt it obvious that it is?

  • It might not be.

  • Maybe a little, but each one will have new units and stuff, so it's a little more worth it.

  • I agree. I consider myself a Terran fan so I won't be waiting long :p Plus that the starcraft story is the best ever made for a computer game. And the game is still one of the most popular despite it has been more than a decade since its release. I can't wait :)

  • deff not best story but good strat is needed

  • Well, there are many point of views ;)

  • Dude each one will be huge... very single player, this inst some catch, theres just a LOT of data

  • @tipoomaster me 2

  • @tipoomaster ive thought of many things like this one before, but now i realize that this is blizzard entertainment

    they've always released games that are one of the best ever

  • o man, i was thinking taht the tree one will be in 1 game (like starcraft 1) the tree campaing, but damm, maybe thats why blizzard is taking soo long to develop this game, i hope they release the others 2 fast when the first comes

  • this is a bit of a sacm to get money but im sure blizzard will make the games amazing and if you love the story of starcraft you will get every game and im guesing 6 month intervals for each game at lest but stop bicthing this is going to make the campain that much more fun more missions more epic and if your not in it for that than its ok multiplayer will stay the same and if thats all your in for than you just have to buy one game calm down everyone

  • unless buying each game contributes in a positive manner towards multiplayer then blizzard just made a huge mistake b/c few people will buy all three then

  • eh.... we dont have to buy the other 2 games. we can just buy the starcraft 2 terran one and just play multiplayer cause i dont wanna waste about 150$ (plus tax) just to play 3 races-_-(in campaign)

  • -_-, the other 2 games are just an expansion. so the first game, wings of liberty, will cost more. Its like warcraft 3, the original cost more than the expansions. so all together the games should be under $100 bucks if you buy at the military base. (woot i got a military card, food cost twice as less, new released games only cost 40 bucks)

  • 3 games? 60 dollars each 3 x 60 = ? ... FUCK OFF BLIZZARD i hope every one will get the games out of pirate bay! FUCK YOU BLIZZARD

  • what do you guys think the price range is going to be? im gona guess its going to cost around 34.99, but i really doubt it heck with 3 games and taxes that more than $100

  • full priced game man, i checked at my local store

  • Star Craft 2 campigns

    1. Terrans Wings Of Liberty

    2. Zerg Heart Of The Swarm

    3. Protoss Legacy Of Void

    Same order of campigns just like the original Star Craft!

  • I heard rumours that not many people are reserving Star Craft 2. I don't think it will be popular. It will always be popular to me! So this means that they are selling Star Craft 2 in three seperate expnations sets just like World Of Warcraft?

  • Sad blizzard is becoming the new EA sersly even EA has gotten out of the whole ''evil money vaccums'' and now blizzard is taking there place,

    Not to all devs, You think that we people are idiots and just walking around to pay you? no im not buying 3 parts of the same game, If you hade more vaild reasons for making a triology then perhaps i would but they dont.

    Huge fail blizzard Dont go down that dark evil path, You'll only end up killing your own company.

  • If WoW can have 3+ games and still sell millions, then Starcraft 2 can too.

  • yes but Wow is an MMO theres big diffrence bettwen MMOs and RTS.

    In MMOs expansions are actully adding content. (usually huge content with lots of hours of GP following)

    In RTS an Expansion is the addition of a new race of a huge unit or race Overhaul or a new race,

    Blizzard is doing correclty with the first and just despertly money milking fans with the ladder. As is a huge chance that each ''expansion'' will add nothing to the races other then the campaings. Word limit..

  • Blizzard confirmed several times in several interviews that the expansions will add what every typical RTS expansion adds: units, feautres, and campaigns.

    Every modern RTS does expansions and nobody bats an eye, so I don't understand why it's so despicable and "EA-like" now.

  • If blizzard was doing proper expansions i would'nt care either however they'r not, they took what was full game SC-2 and chopped it into 3 just so they could make more money on it, Also 1 campaing + 1 or 2 units wont do for an expansion, Micro expasion Perhaps, but not a ful one, the reason why its so ''Ea-like'' is cause blizzard is showing less and less that they care about Qquallity and more about Quantity (misspelled i know) which is what EA used to do.

  • And also expansions to none FPS usually dont sell for full game prices, Blizzard is selling all 3 parts for full store price.

    599 sek (swedish money)

    599 * 3 = 1797 while a few others SW:EAW main game 399 (after price drop no ide what original price was) and expansion 299 (original price.)

  • There's nothing saying that they will all be full price. Blizzard has stated multiple times they don't know what the expansions will be selling for. Stop making baseless conclusions.

    This is just your regular full game + expansion deal that games have been doing for the last decade. There's nothing EA-like about it.

  • While i will agree that it is somewhat baseless and none from blizzard has said anything, however this is what i think is the straw, they'r not saying anything because they dont whant us to cancel our pre-order and wait for a price drop? its more like'ly that they will make all 3 ''expansions'' full game price.

    There's nothing EA-like about it.

    You dont really see the connection bettwen blizard and EA? Ea untill now has just milked its fans with poorly made games. Word limit c part 2:

  • While Sc2 probly will be a good and well made game however splitting it in 3 just seems to be a way for blizzard to make more money, I.E milking the fans, usually they dont split a game and then charge standard expansion price for it, Its something i would expect from EA not blizzard, Thats why its so EA like, Most like'ly they will charge full game price for all 3 ''expansions'' just to get more money thats whats so ''Ea like'' <-- if you dont understand that nobody else can explain it.

  • Blizzard has been "splitting the games and charging money for it" from the very beginning. Starcraft and Brood War could have just been one game. Same for Diablo and its expansions. Same for Warcraft and its expansions. I could go on for every RTS game in existence.

    Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up and charging extra for it. We gamers tolerate it because we love getting more content, even if it means a little more money. If was fine before, why is it not fine now?

  • Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up.

    Nononono expansions are new content I.E campaings,units,races,maps and such tied into a big enough, what blizzard is doing is not expansions its basicly ''micro-expansions'' but instead will probly charge full price for all 3, Its not ''fine'' to simply break what is suppose to be a full game into 3 and then sell all 3 for full price.

  • Of course it is.

    It's their product, they can do whatever the hell they want with it.

    They have the right to sell their games for $1 or $1,000...

    It's up to YOU, the consumer, to decide whether YOU want to purchase THEIR product!

  • Yup.. shame that most of the ''consumers'' are little kids that wont see that this is just a ploy to get more money.

  • could care less cause the game story is one hell of a good book on video.

    would like to pay little by little then wait for 2 mo yrs and pay everything at once.

  • blizzard might be milking people. but i love blizzard so much they can milk me all they want. YOU sir, go to hell.

    MILK MY TITTIES BLIZ PLZ LULZ OWNT

  • Wow.... Wow just Wow.. they should send you into some kind of stduy room.. or somthing, you'r seriously the most stupid human i'v ever seen.

  • Dude, why is this such a big deal to. You've posted like 60 comments on this video. If you don't like it you can get the hell out. You are like, anti-blizzard. FrostFireCarbine v.s. Blizzard= Blizzard eats your face.

  • Im not anti-blizzard i do infact enjoy several of blizzards games (starcraft,Warcraft,Wow.) but i do dislike this EA approach they'v made to Starcraft 2, They did for no apprent reason just split the game in 3, the ''expansions'' will also most likely not bring any new units, which is not how blizzard do things thats how EA does things, Blizzard dont go milk there fans like this and blizzard is one of the biggest titans in the Vid games industry why would they need more money?

  • Ok seriously... When has Blizzard NOT delivered what is expected out of them? They have been working on this game for a LONG time because they don't want it to be less than customer expectations. Thats the way it is with all of their games. And who says there will be no new units in the latter campaigns? Are you the blizzard god?  Do you know what they are going to do? NO. No one knows, but its true it would be extremely un-blizzard like to NOT have new units in the latter releases.

  • Never said blizzard has not deliver'd they have. No i dont know, however given that this is most like'ly a ploy to give blizzard more money, Why would blizzard waste more money developing more units? Sorry to say it but blizzard has become abit lazy, yes they have been working for a long time, like'ly they will hold out on the 2 latter expansions ''just'' long enough for them to charge full price for all 3 now thats 1500 for all + any expasions to each game. thats not very like blizzard.

  • Ok, you win. Jesus, it's like arguing with a mexican jumping bean underneath the hot Alaskan sun in an igloo surrounded by mystical farting elves. But! The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's multiplayer, so they are making the story fuckin awesome. And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.

  • ''The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's''

    I doubt it..

    ''And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.''

    Me too.

  • This is the way the world works (or doesn't).

  • What Blizzard don't want to say is that second one and third one MOST LIKELY will have new units and better balance. If they say that openly, people will naturally think the first product will be the least balanced unfinished product. So they say multiplayer will be the same, but like Brood War, second and third one will most likely have new units and better balance.

  • huge epic and awesome eh.. i like the sound of that..!

  • i dont care if it's 3x $50.00 games, so long as it lives up to or outdoes the original classic in terms of gameplay, graphics/cinematics, and most importantly storyline. LONG LIVE THE QUEEN OF BLADES!!!

  • Actually it's better that it's a trilogy. They can refine the game along the way and the excitement will last longer.

  • so we have to buy 3 50.00$ game? -.-

  • well...if you don't give a crap about the story and only want multiplayer, you can just get one

  • Thats not right. They will,as i know, include more units for the multyplayer in every part of the trilogy.

    It is kind of very lame,because people like me have not that much money to spend.

    Very sad

  • I'm guessing that since the following games will essentially just build on the first, they'll be cheaper.

  • nah man i doubt it blizzard is gonna kill sc2 man no offense but if u guys go on starcraft or broodwar and ask ppl if they r gonna get sc2 or not, they r gonna say no

  • thanx for taking this off game trailers. much better access here

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more