if people have to buy the 3 seperately... big mistake and i'm just going to download it somewhere. but with the no cliffanger, sounds like the way Dynamix did Starsiege with two seperate campaigns, doing different things so they never crossed paths and you were able to end up with the same ending overall.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
man this is just fucking stupid. Most ppl dont want campaigns i FRICKEN WANT MULTIPLAYER with ALL the units mutherfuckers and wanna play on ladders. this is such a douchebag sceem doesnt blizzard think about their customers budget geez fuck sc2 i like my sc 1
This strategy to divide the game does give them the chance to make three times more money but it wastes like two times it. I don't mind at all this as long as they make one huge game that takes a long time to be surpassed in both length and quality by other future RTS's. When we play and finish the first one, we'll know if the rest is worth buying. If not, we'll stay with the multiplayer only. It might be expensive but it can also become the ultimate RTS experience so far. Think about it.
I agree. I consider myself a Terran fan so I won't be waiting long :p Plus that the starcraft story is the best ever made for a computer game. And the game is still one of the most popular despite it has been more than a decade since its release. I can't wait :)
o man, i was thinking taht the tree one will be in 1 game (like starcraft 1) the tree campaing, but damm, maybe thats why blizzard is taking soo long to develop this game, i hope they release the others 2 fast when the first comes
this is a bit of a sacm to get money but im sure blizzard will make the games amazing and if you love the story of starcraft you will get every game and im guesing 6 month intervals for each game at lest but stop bicthing this is going to make the campain that much more fun more missions more epic and if your not in it for that than its ok multiplayer will stay the same and if thats all your in for than you just have to buy one game calm down everyone
unless buying each game contributes in a positive manner towards multiplayer then blizzard just made a huge mistake b/c few people will buy all three then
eh.... we dont have to buy the other 2 games. we can just buy the starcraft 2 terran one and just play multiplayer cause i dont wanna waste about 150$ (plus tax) just to play 3 races-_-(in campaign)
-_-, the other 2 games are just an expansion. so the first game, wings of liberty, will cost more. Its like warcraft 3, the original cost more than the expansions. so all together the games should be under $100 bucks if you buy at the military base. (woot i got a military card, food cost twice as less, new released games only cost 40 bucks)
what do you guys think the price range is going to be? im gona guess its going to cost around 34.99, but i really doubt it heck with 3 games and taxes that more than $100
I heard rumours that not many people are reserving Star Craft 2. I don't think it will be popular. It will always be popular to me! So this means that they are selling Star Craft 2 in three seperate expnations sets just like World Of Warcraft?
Sad blizzard is becoming the new EA sersly even EA has gotten out of the whole ''evil money vaccums'' and now blizzard is taking there place,
Not to all devs, You think that we people are idiots and just walking around to pay you? no im not buying 3 parts of the same game, If you hade more vaild reasons for making a triology then perhaps i would but they dont.
Huge fail blizzard Dont go down that dark evil path, You'll only end up killing your own company.
yes but Wow is an MMO theres big diffrence bettwen MMOs and RTS.
In MMOs expansions are actully adding content. (usually huge content with lots of hours of GP following)
In RTS an Expansion is the addition of a new race of a huge unit or race Overhaul or a new race,
Blizzard is doing correclty with the first and just despertly money milking fans with the ladder. As is a huge chance that each ''expansion'' will add nothing to the races other then the campaings. Word limit..
Blizzard confirmed several times in several interviews that the expansions will add what every typical RTS expansion adds: units, feautres, and campaigns.
Every modern RTS does expansions and nobody bats an eye, so I don't understand why it's so despicable and "EA-like" now.
If blizzard was doing proper expansions i would'nt care either however they'r not, they took what was full game SC-2 and chopped it into 3 just so they could make more money on it, Also 1 campaing + 1 or 2 units wont do for an expansion, Micro expasion Perhaps, but not a ful one, the reason why its so ''Ea-like'' is cause blizzard is showing less and less that they care about Qquallity and more about Quantity (misspelled i know) which is what EA used to do.
There's nothing saying that they will all be full price. Blizzard has stated multiple times they don't know what the expansions will be selling for. Stop making baseless conclusions.
This is just your regular full game + expansion deal that games have been doing for the last decade. There's nothing EA-like about it.
While i will agree that it is somewhat baseless and none from blizzard has said anything, however this is what i think is the straw, they'r not saying anything because they dont whant us to cancel our pre-order and wait for a price drop? its more like'ly that they will make all 3 ''expansions'' full game price.
There's nothing EA-like about it.
You dont really see the connection bettwen blizard and EA? Ea untill now has just milked its fans with poorly made games. Word limit c part 2:
While Sc2 probly will be a good and well made game however splitting it in 3 just seems to be a way for blizzard to make more money, I.E milking the fans, usually they dont split a game and then charge standard expansion price for it, Its something i would expect from EA not blizzard, Thats why its so EA like, Most like'ly they will charge full game price for all 3 ''expansions'' just to get more money thats whats so ''Ea like'' <-- if you dont understand that nobody else can explain it.
Blizzard has been "splitting the games and charging money for it" from the very beginning. Starcraft and Brood War could have just been one game. Same for Diablo and its expansions. Same for Warcraft and its expansions. I could go on for every RTS game in existence.
Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up and charging extra for it. We gamers tolerate it because we love getting more content, even if it means a little more money. If was fine before, why is it not fine now?
Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up.
Nononono expansions are new content I.E campaings,units,races,maps and such tied into a big enough, what blizzard is doing is not expansions its basicly ''micro-expansions'' but instead will probly charge full price for all 3, Its not ''fine'' to simply break what is suppose to be a full game into 3 and then sell all 3 for full price.
Dude, why is this such a big deal to. You've posted like 60 comments on this video. If you don't like it you can get the hell out. You are like, anti-blizzard. FrostFireCarbine v.s. Blizzard= Blizzard eats your face.
Im not anti-blizzard i do infact enjoy several of blizzards games (starcraft,Warcraft,Wow.) but i do dislike this EA approach they'v made to Starcraft 2, They did for no apprent reason just split the game in 3, the ''expansions'' will also most likely not bring any new units, which is not how blizzard do things thats how EA does things, Blizzard dont go milk there fans like this and blizzard is one of the biggest titans in the Vid games industry why would they need more money?
Ok seriously... When has Blizzard NOT delivered what is expected out of them? They have been working on this game for a LONG time because they don't want it to be less than customer expectations. Thats the way it is with all of their games. And who says there will be no new units in the latter campaigns? Are you the blizzard god? Do you know what they are going to do? NO. No one knows, but its true it would be extremely un-blizzard like to NOT have new units in the latter releases.
Never said blizzard has not deliver'd they have. No i dont know, however given that this is most like'ly a ploy to give blizzard more money, Why would blizzard waste more money developing more units? Sorry to say it but blizzard has become abit lazy, yes they have been working for a long time, like'ly they will hold out on the 2 latter expansions ''just'' long enough for them to charge full price for all 3 now thats 1500 for all + any expasions to each game. thats not very like blizzard.
Ok, you win. Jesus, it's like arguing with a mexican jumping bean underneath the hot Alaskan sun in an igloo surrounded by mystical farting elves. But! The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's multiplayer, so they are making the story fuckin awesome. And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.
''The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's''
I doubt it..
''And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.''
What Blizzard don't want to say is that second one and third one MOST LIKELY will have new units and better balance. If they say that openly, people will naturally think the first product will be the least balanced unfinished product. So they say multiplayer will be the same, but like Brood War, second and third one will most likely have new units and better balance.
i dont care if it's 3x $50.00 games, so long as it lives up to or outdoes the original classic in terms of gameplay, graphics/cinematics, and most importantly storyline. LONG LIVE THE QUEEN OF BLADES!!!
nah man i doubt it blizzard is gonna kill sc2 man no offense but if u guys go on starcraft or broodwar and ask ppl if they r gonna get sc2 or not, they r gonna say no
1 dick gead :P
7DickHead7 10 months ago
@JChoiSauce where do u see fluffy bunnies??????
gaterin1998 1 year ago
this is bullshitt... they make 3 chapter for money!!! argh!! In starcraft 1 they make 3 in 1 that easier...
ishard3 1 year ago
@ishard3 becouse lower graphics ???? ur so dump :D
gaterin1998 1 year ago
@gaterin1998 Lol you're so dumb for spelling you're, dumb and because wrong.
CreeDofNeoN 11 months ago
It will be. SC2's terran campaign is supposed to be 20+ hours with only the regular missions
Chiefslayer117 1 year ago
Well at least this doesnt surprise me, waiting for that company that won't devise ways to make money...still gonne be an awesome game
stryfe1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 Free Starcraft 2 Beta Keys From MicroStarcraft2 in HD Contest! Give Away in my
Channel
This is a contest in my channel not fake website. so just click on my name Microstarcraft2
MicroStarcraft2 1 year ago
good news is i got beta
NEdarkoPWNED 1 year ago
@NEdarkoPWNED same
Zamath119 1 year ago
If you want SC2 beta key just head to Starcraft2Keys(.)tk there is a guy who gives them away
StrongDyna81 1 year ago
ppl commenting retarded... you get all 3 in 1 game...--.--
Zeren1ty 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get BETA keys here..hurry!
starcraft2-beta-keys .weebly (dot) com
makeitrainish 1 year ago
trilogy of milking what should have been 1 sequel and perhaps an expansion
SRNF 2 years ago
Im sure well gobble it up anyway, like a whore
lurdk 2 years ago
greedy greedy blizzard.
phils920 2 years ago
@phils920 It's a business. At least it's not a monthly sub like shitty ass WoW
westboarder 1 year ago
@westboarder imagine if they made a WoW out of Starcraft.
Mifonerru 1 year ago
@Mifonerru Yeaaaaaahh. No Thanks. I like to play video games for fun, not as a part time job.
westboarder 1 year ago
@westboarder lol and yet... if they do... most of us would probably quit our day jobs lol
WOok2a 9 months ago
Wings of Liberty? LOL
What a generic shitty name
gdbaradit 2 years ago
Fuck you. In the ear.
Jabels187 2 years ago
@gdbaradit ? u must be the most retarded person on youtube for sure dude u SUCK
thegoddescomposer 2 years ago
if people have to buy the 3 seperately... big mistake and i'm just going to download it somewhere. but with the no cliffanger, sounds like the way Dynamix did Starsiege with two seperate campaigns, doing different things so they never crossed paths and you were able to end up with the same ending overall.
RosieKR 2 years ago
1 game 3 mony... nice tactic: eat your heart out pro players hehe
Thoogah 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man this is just fucking stupid. Most ppl dont want campaigns i FRICKEN WANT MULTIPLAYER with ALL the units mutherfuckers and wanna play on ladders. this is such a douchebag sceem doesnt blizzard think about their customers budget geez fuck sc2 i like my sc 1
r4j2iLL 2 years ago
what don't you understand in "nothing changes for multiplayer" ?
opidsa 2 years ago
No, the first release will include all the races/options for the multiplayer mode...
Womack51 2 years ago
anyone else realize that in the specific campaigns you get no practice with the other races other than online?
RogueRX8 2 years ago
fluffy bunnis lmao
Palamneus 2 years ago
Its stupid if they only release 1 at a time or all 3 altogether casue Im not buying the 3 separately
Hartsock2008 2 years ago
lol XD your right :D
toektoektoek 2 years ago
i hope they have a box set
Jopet5 2 years ago
Terran *cricket chirps*
Zerg *riots in the street*
Protoss *anarchy in the crowd*
TheMcMurph 2 years ago
how long in between each section being released? years or like 6 months?
dingbat313 2 years ago
1 year. Think of them as expansions.
BlinkHawk 2 years ago
Yep!
Womack51 2 years ago
This strategy to divide the game does give them the chance to make three times more money but it wastes like two times it. I don't mind at all this as long as they make one huge game that takes a long time to be surpassed in both length and quality by other future RTS's. When we play and finish the first one, we'll know if the rest is worth buying. If not, we'll stay with the multiplayer only. It might be expensive but it can also become the ultimate RTS experience so far. Think about it.
SenhordosCarinhos 2 years ago
epic mi ass blizzard just want money
gigasama 2 years ago 2
As the multiplayer doesn't change, I expect the expansions to be cheaper than the original SC.
LoloftheRings 2 years ago 3
I realy hope this trilogy thing isnt just a money grab.
tipoomaster 2 years ago 11
isnt it obvious that it is?
EJPros 2 years ago
It might not be.
tipoomaster 2 years ago
Maybe a little, but each one will have new units and stuff, so it's a little more worth it.
ThundergodxRaiden 2 years ago
I agree. I consider myself a Terran fan so I won't be waiting long :p Plus that the starcraft story is the best ever made for a computer game. And the game is still one of the most popular despite it has been more than a decade since its release. I can't wait :)
zaho87 2 years ago 2
deff not best story but good strat is needed
EJPros 2 years ago
Well, there are many point of views ;)
zaho87 2 years ago
Dude each one will be huge... very single player, this inst some catch, theres just a LOT of data
Vivical 2 years ago 2
@tipoomaster me 2
Zamath119 1 year ago
@tipoomaster ive thought of many things like this one before, but now i realize that this is blizzard entertainment
they've always released games that are one of the best ever
rednas3636 1 year ago
o man, i was thinking taht the tree one will be in 1 game (like starcraft 1) the tree campaing, but damm, maybe thats why blizzard is taking soo long to develop this game, i hope they release the others 2 fast when the first comes
umbrella12 2 years ago
this is a bit of a sacm to get money but im sure blizzard will make the games amazing and if you love the story of starcraft you will get every game and im guesing 6 month intervals for each game at lest but stop bicthing this is going to make the campain that much more fun more missions more epic and if your not in it for that than its ok multiplayer will stay the same and if thats all your in for than you just have to buy one game calm down everyone
xero989 2 years ago
unless buying each game contributes in a positive manner towards multiplayer then blizzard just made a huge mistake b/c few people will buy all three then
Kparris7 2 years ago
eh.... we dont have to buy the other 2 games. we can just buy the starcraft 2 terran one and just play multiplayer cause i dont wanna waste about 150$ (plus tax) just to play 3 races-_-(in campaign)
UnfairBattle 2 years ago
-_-, the other 2 games are just an expansion. so the first game, wings of liberty, will cost more. Its like warcraft 3, the original cost more than the expansions. so all together the games should be under $100 bucks if you buy at the military base. (woot i got a military card, food cost twice as less, new released games only cost 40 bucks)
cebuanoguy 2 years ago
3 games? 60 dollars each 3 x 60 = ? ... FUCK OFF BLIZZARD i hope every one will get the games out of pirate bay! FUCK YOU BLIZZARD
69lol69 2 years ago
what do you guys think the price range is going to be? im gona guess its going to cost around 34.99, but i really doubt it heck with 3 games and taxes that more than $100
Rojas33589 3 years ago
full priced game man, i checked at my local store
rrXIII 2 years ago
Star Craft 2 campigns
1. Terrans Wings Of Liberty
2. Zerg Heart Of The Swarm
3. Protoss Legacy Of Void
Same order of campigns just like the original Star Craft!
Dusto22 3 years ago
I heard rumours that not many people are reserving Star Craft 2. I don't think it will be popular. It will always be popular to me! So this means that they are selling Star Craft 2 in three seperate expnations sets just like World Of Warcraft?
Dusto22 3 years ago
Sad blizzard is becoming the new EA sersly even EA has gotten out of the whole ''evil money vaccums'' and now blizzard is taking there place,
Not to all devs, You think that we people are idiots and just walking around to pay you? no im not buying 3 parts of the same game, If you hade more vaild reasons for making a triology then perhaps i would but they dont.
Huge fail blizzard Dont go down that dark evil path, You'll only end up killing your own company.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
If WoW can have 3+ games and still sell millions, then Starcraft 2 can too.
ItoMANkoto 3 years ago
yes but Wow is an MMO theres big diffrence bettwen MMOs and RTS.
In MMOs expansions are actully adding content. (usually huge content with lots of hours of GP following)
In RTS an Expansion is the addition of a new race of a huge unit or race Overhaul or a new race,
Blizzard is doing correclty with the first and just despertly money milking fans with the ladder. As is a huge chance that each ''expansion'' will add nothing to the races other then the campaings. Word limit..
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Blizzard confirmed several times in several interviews that the expansions will add what every typical RTS expansion adds: units, feautres, and campaigns.
Every modern RTS does expansions and nobody bats an eye, so I don't understand why it's so despicable and "EA-like" now.
ItoMANkoto 3 years ago
If blizzard was doing proper expansions i would'nt care either however they'r not, they took what was full game SC-2 and chopped it into 3 just so they could make more money on it, Also 1 campaing + 1 or 2 units wont do for an expansion, Micro expasion Perhaps, but not a ful one, the reason why its so ''Ea-like'' is cause blizzard is showing less and less that they care about Qquallity and more about Quantity (misspelled i know) which is what EA used to do.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
And also expansions to none FPS usually dont sell for full game prices, Blizzard is selling all 3 parts for full store price.
599 sek (swedish money)
599 * 3 = 1797 while a few others SW:EAW main game 399 (after price drop no ide what original price was) and expansion 299 (original price.)
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
There's nothing saying that they will all be full price. Blizzard has stated multiple times they don't know what the expansions will be selling for. Stop making baseless conclusions.
This is just your regular full game + expansion deal that games have been doing for the last decade. There's nothing EA-like about it.
ItoMANkoto 3 years ago
While i will agree that it is somewhat baseless and none from blizzard has said anything, however this is what i think is the straw, they'r not saying anything because they dont whant us to cancel our pre-order and wait for a price drop? its more like'ly that they will make all 3 ''expansions'' full game price.
There's nothing EA-like about it.
You dont really see the connection bettwen blizard and EA? Ea untill now has just milked its fans with poorly made games. Word limit c part 2:
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
While Sc2 probly will be a good and well made game however splitting it in 3 just seems to be a way for blizzard to make more money, I.E milking the fans, usually they dont split a game and then charge standard expansion price for it, Its something i would expect from EA not blizzard, Thats why its so EA like, Most like'ly they will charge full game price for all 3 ''expansions'' just to get more money thats whats so ''Ea like'' <-- if you dont understand that nobody else can explain it.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Blizzard has been "splitting the games and charging money for it" from the very beginning. Starcraft and Brood War could have just been one game. Same for Diablo and its expansions. Same for Warcraft and its expansions. I could go on for every RTS game in existence.
Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up and charging extra for it. We gamers tolerate it because we love getting more content, even if it means a little more money. If was fine before, why is it not fine now?
ItoMANkoto 3 years ago
Expansions BY THEIR VERY NATURE are splitting the game up.
Nononono expansions are new content I.E campaings,units,races,maps and such tied into a big enough, what blizzard is doing is not expansions its basicly ''micro-expansions'' but instead will probly charge full price for all 3, Its not ''fine'' to simply break what is suppose to be a full game into 3 and then sell all 3 for full price.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Of course it is.
It's their product, they can do whatever the hell they want with it.
They have the right to sell their games for $1 or $1,000...
It's up to YOU, the consumer, to decide whether YOU want to purchase THEIR product!
Smudge4C 3 years ago 2
Yup.. shame that most of the ''consumers'' are little kids that wont see that this is just a ploy to get more money.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
could care less cause the game story is one hell of a good book on video.
would like to pay little by little then wait for 2 mo yrs and pay everything at once.
1kr 3 years ago
blizzard might be milking people. but i love blizzard so much they can milk me all they want. YOU sir, go to hell.
MILK MY TITTIES BLIZ PLZ LULZ OWNT
bethanyil05 3 years ago
Wow.... Wow just Wow.. they should send you into some kind of stduy room.. or somthing, you'r seriously the most stupid human i'v ever seen.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Dude, why is this such a big deal to. You've posted like 60 comments on this video. If you don't like it you can get the hell out. You are like, anti-blizzard. FrostFireCarbine v.s. Blizzard= Blizzard eats your face.
bethanyil05 3 years ago
Im not anti-blizzard i do infact enjoy several of blizzards games (starcraft,Warcraft,Wow.) but i do dislike this EA approach they'v made to Starcraft 2, They did for no apprent reason just split the game in 3, the ''expansions'' will also most likely not bring any new units, which is not how blizzard do things thats how EA does things, Blizzard dont go milk there fans like this and blizzard is one of the biggest titans in the Vid games industry why would they need more money?
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Ok seriously... When has Blizzard NOT delivered what is expected out of them? They have been working on this game for a LONG time because they don't want it to be less than customer expectations. Thats the way it is with all of their games. And who says there will be no new units in the latter campaigns? Are you the blizzard god? Do you know what they are going to do? NO. No one knows, but its true it would be extremely un-blizzard like to NOT have new units in the latter releases.
bethanyil05 3 years ago
Never said blizzard has not deliver'd they have. No i dont know, however given that this is most like'ly a ploy to give blizzard more money, Why would blizzard waste more money developing more units? Sorry to say it but blizzard has become abit lazy, yes they have been working for a long time, like'ly they will hold out on the 2 latter expansions ''just'' long enough for them to charge full price for all 3 now thats 1500 for all + any expasions to each game. thats not very like blizzard.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
Ok, you win. Jesus, it's like arguing with a mexican jumping bean underneath the hot Alaskan sun in an igloo surrounded by mystical farting elves. But! The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's multiplayer, so they are making the story fuckin awesome. And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.
bethanyil05 3 years ago
''The only thing I am afraid of is Blizzard has a feeling that the multiplayer isn't going to be as good as SC 1's''
I doubt it..
''And I'll be really disappointed when they charge 50$ a pop for these games. And even more pissed off when they are 30$ for the whole fuckin stack a few years later.''
Me too.
FrostFireCarbine 3 years ago
This is the way the world works (or doesn't).
Ieyusa 3 years ago
What Blizzard don't want to say is that second one and third one MOST LIKELY will have new units and better balance. If they say that openly, people will naturally think the first product will be the least balanced unfinished product. So they say multiplayer will be the same, but like Brood War, second and third one will most likely have new units and better balance.
normalman37 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
huge, epic, and 3 times the cost...fuck you Blizzard
Thurgor 3 years ago
huge epic and awesome eh.. i like the sound of that..!
grache92 3 years ago
i dont care if it's 3x $50.00 games, so long as it lives up to or outdoes the original classic in terms of gameplay, graphics/cinematics, and most importantly storyline. LONG LIVE THE QUEEN OF BLADES!!!
kingdraster 3 years ago 2
Actually it's better that it's a trilogy. They can refine the game along the way and the excitement will last longer.
TemplarX2 3 years ago 2
so we have to buy 3 50.00$ game? -.-
divine0g0d 3 years ago 2
well...if you don't give a crap about the story and only want multiplayer, you can just get one
bchan003 3 years ago
Thats not right. They will,as i know, include more units for the multyplayer in every part of the trilogy.
It is kind of very lame,because people like me have not that much money to spend.
Very sad
shurednichso 3 years ago
I'm guessing that since the following games will essentially just build on the first, they'll be cheaper.
CommanderSalamander 3 years ago
nah man i doubt it blizzard is gonna kill sc2 man no offense but if u guys go on starcraft or broodwar and ask ppl if they r gonna get sc2 or not, they r gonna say no
divine0g0d 3 years ago
thanx for taking this off game trailers. much better access here
dashlum629 3 years ago