@ChristConquers ... you seem to display no interest in educating yourself and are quite happy with your own fore-drawn conclusions. But I will concede to you that fighting the uphill battle of disproving the theory of evolution must be incredibly frustrating. Good luck with it. I'll won't be holding my breath for you success in punching holes in the theory of evolution through comments on Youtube. Good luck.
@ChristConquers Now you're just trolling or just a strange individual who only accepts evidence provided in YT comments. Here's a suggestion, take one of the fossils of the species listed above, go to your local university library, and kindly ask the librarian for books or peer reviewed scientific papers about said species. That might help you better understand the evidence as to why they are regarded transitional. But as evidenced by your belligerent comments...
@ChristConquers Here's small list, but it should give you enough to work with, you only have to read the scientific papers associated with them. # Notharctus # Parapithecus # Propliopithecus # Aegyptopithecus # Limnopithecus # Dryopithecus # Ramapithecus # Australopithecus # Homo habilis. # Homo erectus # Homo sapiens sapiens # Homo sapiens neanderthalensis All species and their fossils are "transitional", life is always changing and adapting.
0:44 "Common Descent is a fact" I like how the video gets away with saying "we won't be providing evidence for this claim, but we need you to accept it to accept everything else we're about to say"
@andythefork: If you are ever going to get anywhere beyond the genetic/fossil evidence, you eventually have to assume the evidence is overwhelming, the the audience accepts it and then you can go on to look at consequences. It is evidenced in a plethora of other vids, research papers and screeds. Just ask, and we can supply details.
@puncheex The problem is there's no evidence of common ancestry. The fossil record, which is quite extensive now, only shows two kinds of fauna - creatures that are still around and largely unchanged, and creatures that have gone extinct. There are no transitional species and no studied evolutionist will claim otherwise. Every heralded "missing link" has later been proven falsified or misidentified.
@andythefork: Andy, that is just plain wrong. There is no "two kinds of fauna"; the fossils show continuous change in the past right down to the extant animals (and plants) living today. Today we have dogs and bears; in the past we find intermediates between the two, such that it becomes impossible to classify a specimen as one or the other. The same thing goes for cats and hyenas, and back farther between cat/hyenas and dog/bears. Whales show a continuum from land animal to today's sea life.
... And as for the little well-poisoner of "There are no transitional species and no studied evolutionist will claim otherwise", you are incorrect as well. While I may not be a school biologist I know enough of them to claim that as hogwash. The claim is made, has been made from well before Darwin ever louder right down to the present. No "studied" person, at least in biology and paleontology, doubts it.
@ChristConquers your statement indicates 2 things, 1) you're not familiar with the definitions that scientists use, and 2) your mind is made up already. So providing you with anything would be an exercise in futility. The scientific data is there for the taking, you could start by reading it, If you have an alternative theory, you are welcome to try to prove it, but remember, falsifying one theory does not automatically "prove" another.
@ChristConquers ALL fossils are transitional, WE as are ALL living species are transitional and evolution is a constant. We know this from observation, which in its self is scientific.
You clearly have very little idea what you are talking about. Go back to your fairytales and superstitions and leave the grownups to talk about reality...thanks.
@spiminator Thanks, It was made by the people at the Cassiopeia project. They make great educational videos and they are all put into the public domain.
''Matter can't make matter = first law of thermodynamics. And it couldn't have always been here for thousands of years = second law of thermodynamics''
This may have been the most ignorant and close minded thing i've ever heard, you think god created everything? Boom that means matter created matter which proves you wrong, you don't think everything could have exists for thousands of years? explain how god was supposedly here forever.. you proved YOURSELF wrong lol..
If there is no God than how was the earth made? Matter can't make matter = first law of thermodynamics. And it couldn't have always been here for thousands of years = second law of thermodynamics (entropy)!!! Think about it!!!!!!!!!!!! Mathematically you can't go wrong with the bible with all that it has predicted = ONLY JESUS SAVES......BELIEVE IN HIM!!
What does mythology have to do with this video? The video simple presents the empirical facts of what humanity has observed and is known to be true. While all the different creation stories by hundreds of religions make for wonderful reading, like most fairy tales they have no basis in the real world. Science has saved more people in the world from starvation than jesus has.
The Earth wasn't "made". It formed. Matter was already existing before the Earth formed, so "Matter can't make matter" isn't an argument against the formation of the Earth. The first law of thermodynamics doesn't say what you claim it says. Neither does the second.
Scientifically, you can't go right with the Bible. The things it claims about the universe are demonstrably false.
" There is, unfortunately for evolutionists, not a shred of evidence of any living thing ever evolving into some different kind of living thing capable of breeding but infertile with its parent stock. " - A N Field
if any evolutionists want to know my theory about my theory about what happened to humans, email me...I'm not going to waste my time talking to some knuckleheads...I'll just say that evolution is not true and I think I've debunked the whole theory
" There is, unfortunately for evolutionists, not a shred of evidence of any living thing ever evolving into some different kind of living thing capable of breeding but infertile with its parent stock. " -- A.N. Field
Are those quotes the basis of your theory? Anyone can quote mine. All the money poured through the Discovery Institute and they haven't produced one shed of evidence for creation. Since you are so sure of yourself you should be talking to them and not wasting your time posting comments on youtube. The Discovery Institute has been proven wrong on every turn, they're probably desperate for your theory.
@EnglishCaddy Hey EnglishCaddy, this guy "cypher955" killed your Evolution. He did researching on this one. With all his remarks, he really make more sense. He allow critical thinking here to rationalized the false messages of the video. What do you think about his remarks and his evidence against evolution?
@gearzone2611 "What do you think about his remarks and his evidence against evolution? " What evidence? It's amazing that you believe in a few comments he's "overturned" decades of research. Firstly, I see no cypher shows no evidence of research, no sources, and no critical thought no understanding of evolution. He's only presented his opinion, which everyone is allowed to do. Both you and cypher fail on so many accounts, and I find your comments amusing! Thanks for posting
at 1:30 into the video, he's already said a few fallises...first of all, you don't know that all life has a common descent and 2nd of all, you don't know that species evolve at all...if species evolved then why can't birds swim underwater...yes, I believe some species die off but that is not evolution...this video claimed things are facts without any proof at all
ok, I watched the whole thing...it claims that for each branch of a descent tree, two species evolved from that single species...how is this possible? wouldn't the more advanced species kill off the more primitive and thus kill the tree? once humans were created, why didn't they kill off the less advanced and thus kill off any possibilty for apes to be created? It doesn't make any sense to me and some point then humans had to have co-existed with this more primitive version of humans
Absolutely, we do all share common building blocks. As humans we actually share 50% of our DNA with bananas. Does that mean bananas originated from the same species humans did?
I've got a Masters and a first class degree. I often wonder if we know 50%, 5% or 0......5% of what there is to know. This video is great - and I'm glad it avoids religious debate. I think it fails on the presumtions that the evedence it presents fits both 'scientific' and religious agendas.
Wonderful sir, that gets a 5* outta me. Here's hoping we can get people actually educated in this subject. We've got far too many who would drag us back to the dark ages in the sciences.
Hi, all references and more can be found on the Cassiopeia Project website the people who produced this and many other videos. Or you can goolge the ESA, NCSE, National Academy of Sciences, American Institute of Biological Sciences, American Society of Naturalists. I'll post them in video notes shortly. YouTube doesn't allow links here.
very interesting thanks
MrJonkelp 6 days ago
i enjoyed this vid
jayejayeee 1 week ago
common descent is not a fact. it is only a presumption.
SuperLeonti 2 months ago
@SuperLeonti Any argument or explanation to prove your point?
ppsp3 1 month ago
I like how early on in the video it shows around 3minutes the monkeys and then the black woman. Nice touch.
SoCalFlya 6 months ago
Damn I want to see part 2 and so on but I have to get to school ASAP:D.
offwithurhead 9 months ago
@ChristConquers ... you seem to display no interest in educating yourself and are quite happy with your own fore-drawn conclusions. But I will concede to you that fighting the uphill battle of disproving the theory of evolution must be incredibly frustrating. Good luck with it. I'll won't be holding my breath for you success in punching holes in the theory of evolution through comments on Youtube. Good luck.
EnglishCaddy 9 months ago
@ChristConquers Now you're just trolling or just a strange individual who only accepts evidence provided in YT comments. Here's a suggestion, take one of the fossils of the species listed above, go to your local university library, and kindly ask the librarian for books or peer reviewed scientific papers about said species. That might help you better understand the evidence as to why they are regarded transitional. But as evidenced by your belligerent comments...
EnglishCaddy 9 months ago
EnglishCaddy 9 months ago
0:44 "Common Descent is a fact" I like how the video gets away with saying "we won't be providing evidence for this claim, but we need you to accept it to accept everything else we're about to say"
andythefork 9 months ago
@andythefork: If you are ever going to get anywhere beyond the genetic/fossil evidence, you eventually have to assume the evidence is overwhelming, the the audience accepts it and then you can go on to look at consequences. It is evidenced in a plethora of other vids, research papers and screeds. Just ask, and we can supply details.
puncheex 7 months ago
@puncheex The problem is there's no evidence of common ancestry. The fossil record, which is quite extensive now, only shows two kinds of fauna - creatures that are still around and largely unchanged, and creatures that have gone extinct. There are no transitional species and no studied evolutionist will claim otherwise. Every heralded "missing link" has later been proven falsified or misidentified.
andythefork 6 months ago
@andythefork: Andy, that is just plain wrong. There is no "two kinds of fauna"; the fossils show continuous change in the past right down to the extant animals (and plants) living today. Today we have dogs and bears; in the past we find intermediates between the two, such that it becomes impossible to classify a specimen as one or the other. The same thing goes for cats and hyenas, and back farther between cat/hyenas and dog/bears. Whales show a continuum from land animal to today's sea life.
puncheex 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
... And as for the little well-poisoner of "There are no transitional species and no studied evolutionist will claim otherwise", you are incorrect as well. While I may not be a school biologist I know enough of them to claim that as hogwash. The claim is made, has been made from well before Darwin ever louder right down to the present. No "studied" person, at least in biology and paleontology, doubts it.
puncheex 6 months ago
@ChristConquers your statement indicates 2 things, 1) you're not familiar with the definitions that scientists use, and 2) your mind is made up already. So providing you with anything would be an exercise in futility. The scientific data is there for the taking, you could start by reading it, If you have an alternative theory, you are welcome to try to prove it, but remember, falsifying one theory does not automatically "prove" another.
EnglishCaddy 9 months ago
@ChristConquers ALL fossils are transitional, WE as are ALL living species are transitional and evolution is a constant. We know this from observation, which in its self is scientific.
EnglishCaddy 10 months ago
Are you sure that lizards never have feathers? I’m pretty sure that I saw a lizard with feathers once.
dmh497 1 year ago
@dmh497 Where?
Krisbcream1 10 months ago
they lost at 0:33 "we will not start from scratch today" everything after "but" is bullshit.
ClintTrinity 1 year ago
@ClintTrinity Thanks for the comment. Anything substantial to add?
EnglishCaddy 1 year ago 2
@ClintTrinity
You clearly have very little idea what you are talking about. Go back to your fairytales and superstitions and leave the grownups to talk about reality...thanks.
perydwyn 1 year ago 2
@ClintTrinity I guess you're a christian.
1chamberlain1 11 months ago
Brilliant video!
spiminator 1 year ago
@spiminator Thanks, It was made by the people at the Cassiopeia project. They make great educational videos and they are all put into the public domain.
EnglishCaddy 1 year ago
evolution is false....Allah created you.....nothink evolved at all.......
TheDawahKid 1 year ago
LOL @ dawahkid, thanks for lightening up the comments.
EnglishCaddy 1 year ago
@TheDawahKid seems he created you without a brain...oops
83Hammerhead 1 year ago
''Matter can't make matter = first law of thermodynamics. And it couldn't have always been here for thousands of years = second law of thermodynamics''
This may have been the most ignorant and close minded thing i've ever heard, you think god created everything? Boom that means matter created matter which proves you wrong, you don't think everything could have exists for thousands of years? explain how god was supposedly here forever.. you proved YOURSELF wrong lol..
mechanix80 1 year ago
If there is no God than how was the earth made? Matter can't make matter = first law of thermodynamics. And it couldn't have always been here for thousands of years = second law of thermodynamics (entropy)!!! Think about it!!!!!!!!!!!! Mathematically you can't go wrong with the bible with all that it has predicted = ONLY JESUS SAVES......BELIEVE IN HIM!!
TCAP4444 2 years ago
What does mythology have to do with this video? The video simple presents the empirical facts of what humanity has observed and is known to be true. While all the different creation stories by hundreds of religions make for wonderful reading, like most fairy tales they have no basis in the real world. Science has saved more people in the world from starvation than jesus has.
EnglishCaddy 2 years ago
Ummm yah thats because Jesus gives them that gift and authority to do so. Religion is fake christ is real
BboyRobbo707 2 years ago
@Bboyrobbo LOL thanks, your comment is hilarious and really lightens up the comment wall!
EnglishCaddy 1 year ago
@TCAP4444 you should pray for a brain and some common sense dude...wow your level of stupidity is downright sad!
83Hammerhead 1 year ago
@TCAP4444
The Earth wasn't "made". It formed. Matter was already existing before the Earth formed, so "Matter can't make matter" isn't an argument against the formation of the Earth. The first law of thermodynamics doesn't say what you claim it says. Neither does the second.
Scientifically, you can't go right with the Bible. The things it claims about the universe are demonstrably false.
rkyeun 1 year ago
Birds existed before archaeopterex.
Metatron27 2 years ago
@Metatron27: For example? With citation please.
magick205 2 years ago
@Metatron27 you got any proof for that?
83Hammerhead 1 year ago
" There is, unfortunately for evolutionists, not a shred of evidence of any living thing ever evolving into some different kind of living thing capable of breeding but infertile with its parent stock. " - A N Field
cypher955 2 years ago
Speciation has been observed. Look it up, moron.
kalfjak 2 years ago
if any evolutionists want to know my theory about my theory about what happened to humans, email me...I'm not going to waste my time talking to some knuckleheads...I'll just say that evolution is not true and I think I've debunked the whole theory
cypher955 2 years ago
If you debunked the theory of evolution, I would suggest you publish a paper about it.
EnglishCaddy 2 years ago
" There is, unfortunately for evolutionists, not a shred of evidence of any living thing ever evolving into some different kind of living thing capable of breeding but infertile with its parent stock. " -- A.N. Field
cypher955 2 years ago
When we descend to details, we can prove that no one species has changed (i.e., we cannot prove that a single species has changed); nor can we
prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the
theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others have not" -- Charles Darwin
cypher955 2 years ago
Are those quotes the basis of your theory? Anyone can quote mine. All the money poured through the Discovery Institute and they haven't produced one shed of evidence for creation. Since you are so sure of yourself you should be talking to them and not wasting your time posting comments on youtube. The Discovery Institute has been proven wrong on every turn, they're probably desperate for your theory.
EnglishCaddy 2 years ago
@EnglishCaddy Hey EnglishCaddy, this guy "cypher955" killed your Evolution. He did researching on this one. With all his remarks, he really make more sense. He allow critical thinking here to rationalized the false messages of the video. What do you think about his remarks and his evidence against evolution?
gearzone2611 1 year ago
@gearzone2611 "What do you think about his remarks and his evidence against evolution? " What evidence? It's amazing that you believe in a few comments he's "overturned" decades of research. Firstly, I see no cypher shows no evidence of research, no sources, and no critical thought no understanding of evolution. He's only presented his opinion, which everyone is allowed to do. Both you and cypher fail on so many accounts, and I find your comments amusing! Thanks for posting
EnglishCaddy 1 year ago 5
@gearzone2611: Rarely have I ever heard a sock puppet displayed more clearly.
puncheex 7 months ago
at 1:30 into the video, he's already said a few fallises...first of all, you don't know that all life has a common descent and 2nd of all, you don't know that species evolve at all...if species evolved then why can't birds swim underwater...yes, I believe some species die off but that is not evolution...this video claimed things are facts without any proof at all
cypher955 2 years ago
ok, I watched the whole thing...it claims that for each branch of a descent tree, two species evolved from that single species...how is this possible? wouldn't the more advanced species kill off the more primitive and thus kill the tree? once humans were created, why didn't they kill off the less advanced and thus kill off any possibilty for apes to be created? It doesn't make any sense to me and some point then humans had to have co-existed with this more primitive version of humans
cypher955 2 years ago
Absolutely, we do all share common building blocks. As humans we actually share 50% of our DNA with bananas. Does that mean bananas originated from the same species humans did?
MegaProcrastination 2 years ago
yes.
YetWhyNot 2 years ago
Yup.
MusicHypno 2 years ago
I've got a Masters and a first class degree. I often wonder if we know 50%, 5% or 0......5% of what there is to know. This video is great - and I'm glad it avoids religious debate. I think it fails on the presumtions that the evedence it presents fits both 'scientific' and religious agendas.
AndyWhite007 2 years ago 4
Wonderful sir, that gets a 5* outta me. Here's hoping we can get people actually educated in this subject. We've got far too many who would drag us back to the dark ages in the sciences.
magick205 3 years ago
Pretty good overall. I would like to maybe see some more links to the organizations that you spoke of in this video.
magick205 3 years ago
Hi, all references and more can be found on the Cassiopeia Project website the people who produced this and many other videos. Or you can goolge the ESA, NCSE, National Academy of Sciences, American Institute of Biological Sciences, American Society of Naturalists. I'll post them in video notes shortly. YouTube doesn't allow links here.
EnglishCaddy 3 years ago
Annotations added to the vidoe and links the video notes for the organizations supporting evolution mentioned in the video.
EnglishCaddy 3 years ago