Green plants metabolise all the available carbon dioxide. No possible effect on the weather, as no more carbon dioxide left in the air after photosynthesis.
Biology teaches that green plants sink all the available carbon dioxide. Harvard University has confirmed there has been no increase in free carbon dioxide in the air for last 200 years. Though there has been a 15% increase in crop yields. So no man made climate change-that is all lie from nuclear power
Simply cryogenically freeze 6 billion people. Problem solved.
But seriously folks, the self-contained sustainable arcology is a project that we need to get on. Not just for colonizing Mars, but possibly for remaining secure on Earth.
These alarmists are so transparent, it is laughable. All they really want is more grants from governments. Government funding=your hard earned money via taxes. Who pays more in taxes than anyone else in the planet?? Western civilization. And, yes, it is as simple as that!
this Shaved hippie confuses me... If we emit Co2 we might return to our "normal" climate? So if we dont, we will NEVER EVER have another ice-age or cool period again? It's bull! The climate will return to cooler temps with or without us. This is just change of tactics, when temps. cool down it's actually because it's heating up! AGW-zombies will surely buy into this as their ideology states that Man is a hassle to mother earth either way.
The "normal" climate is characterized by volatility - rapid fluctuations between extremes of hot and cold.
Picture the earth's dynamic atmospheric system as a rubberband or spring being distorted - plucked as it will - by human-released CO2. When it reaches the tipping-point, this will result in a period of rapid oscillation until it settles into a new, stable state. Many complex dynamical systems display this kind of oscillatory behavior and response to perturbations.
Man made co2 isnt warming the planet... even if we could double the ammounts of co2 in the atmosphere (which is mostly natural co2)we'd be lucky to se 1 degree of temperature rise... Sunspot cycles drive the climate on Earth NOT co2!....it woulderfull how these global warming madmen try and blame everything on global warming...
yep it's true. it's funny I was about to write a comment too. you can google: CO2 warming logarithmic and click on the logarithmic curves. you'll see that the greenhouse effect of CO2 doesn't increase much after a certain point. this means that doubling the amout of CO2 won't affect the climate very much. in fact, the biggest increase was previous to now, and we didn't see a drastic increase. the curve is behaving very similar to what it has in the last centuries.
one of the tings that bugs me in this talk, is when he says that warming could trigger a cooling... why??? he doesn't "want to explain" and then says the ice cap melts, so it makes us think that it might be because of the ice melting...hum that's just not true. he better explain that, because his whole talk is based on that. MORE FACTS AND EXPLANATIONS. that's always true. without good explanations, this kidn of talk becomes junk science.
the fact of the matter is that we do not have enough information to make an appropriate analysis of the ENTIRE earth's historic AVG temperature. we have pretty accurate info for the last 40 years, and the tempterature is going up like .5 a decade i think it was, theres a berkly lecture about global warming on youtube, its really informative if ur interested in the matter
we do not have enough information to make an appropriate analysis of the ENTIRE earth's historic AVG temperature.
well we can see that CO2 levels and temperature just don't correlate at all. CO2 plays a very little role in warming the planet. you say:the tempterature is going up like .5 a decade i think it was--yep but no one really nows if it's caused by humans. in fact the curve is just normal. just like it has done before, in the middle ages for example. AGW is mostly a public paranoia.
this doesn't mean that CO2 doesn't have an influence on warming--yes it does, but it's most likely tiny. look up the graphs: the logarithmic curve of CO2's influence on warming. I'll check that berkeley lecture; but you read about Gore's misleads in his documentary. especially, read about his graph of CO2 levels and temperature--CO2 level FOLLOWS temperature rises. he just didn't specify so it's misleading and ppl take that as the best proof in his docu. plz confirm/infirm, debate appreciated.
Global warming may be an exacerbating factor because it melts glaciers and adds loads more fresh water to the ocean. Therefore, it affects the currents by weakening or redirecting them, which will change the climate depending on the region.
Some places may experience severe weather even as the earth on average continues to warm.
aaah came out as a consensus nuthugger, did ya' now? the consensus is NOTHING. What it is, is an abstract for us to laugh at 100 years from now, just like most consensus agreements in the past.
This is a real issue. Warming can trigger cooling. The fresh water in the north atlantic is a hazard to the gulf stream. Look up "younger dryas" on wiki.
Wow, this guy is fricken ridiculus! The last ice ages came and went without human releases of CO2! The Earth's climat is so complex that we cannot try to control it. This guy is just a shill for the military and the nuclear industry, which are inseprable and the two benefactors of the myth of a climate change crisis
The dee psea gives off He and O, as it xdoes nuclear fusion from water. I am nobody's stooge, I think! Power with no CO2 or toxic death. You onject? CO23 goes up in an ice age by the way.
The only people ever killed by nuclear power died from their own stupidity (unsafe handling of fuel) or Russian arrogance (Chernobyl explosion from an unsafe reactor design).
The mayhem in Darfur is down to water shortages, and the mass migration that was the consequence. As too, the War in Iraq is about resources, not WMD, as everyone knows. Instead of people being told the truth and helped to change their ways, they are instead fed proporganda so they will support their Governments actions, and Oh, haven't they done well.
It is only the people who will change things, but you need enough of them to listen.
Check out this vid on human population management...perhaps the greatest way we can influence that component of global warming caused by humans...in the YouTube channel called, "HundredMilTechnology" and titled, "An Unpopular View".
Um, How is global Warming caused by humans?(or rather by Gas being $4.85 and "Big Oil" making too much money?)
Problem with the Environuts claim that CO2 absorbs heat and more of it would absorb more heat is that 1) Google "CO2 is a refrigerant" (specifically it rapidly expands in the presence of heat and cools the area as the result) 2) Unless there is a catalyst converter in the filtration system burning fossil fuels DOES NOT make CO2 as a Byproduct
This oneisjust hilarious...much as the Environuts thinking IR rays bounces around like a fricken Microwave and Magical "Green House Gases" vibrate like food in a microwave and IR rays can magically bounce around off the earth surface and mid air many times to "vibrate" the magical "GHG" a number of times until the air reaches a certain tempoature...and more GHG makes warmer Air cause more of it makes ir absorb more IR rays magically flying by...lol
**more GHG makes warmer Air cause more of it makes ir absorb more IR rays magically flying by**
This is wrong cause
1) The Heat Source, the sun hasn'tchanged and saying doubling a mass in volume can asorb more heat and make thinks hotter without changing the heat source tempature (the sun) is like saying you can bake 2 dozen cookies faster then 1 and they willcook as if in a hotter oven
2) Infared rays either are absorbed or reflected by surfaces 1x and "Mid Air" isn't sense enough to reflect
More importantly the IR absorption rate of gases known as "Green House Gases" focuses on in what is known as "Dry Air" in our atmosphere is, in the real world, negligible. The real world IR rates of gas in "Air" is CO2 1.4f by volume,Nitrogen 1.4F,Oxygen 1.3f, Argon 1.6f,Nitrous Oxide 15f,Methane 1.4f, & Water vapor at 32f-140f based on "humidity" ranging from 1%- 5.5% by volume of Lower troposphere Atmosphere due to evaporation/precipitation
**Man made global warming is melting the Polar Ice,blah,blah,blah)down with Bush and Oil companies and Walmart)**
Um
CO2 being a refrigerant & burning fossil fuels not creating Co2 aside, hotter air doesn't make Ice melt faster which is why back before Refrigeration Chesapeake bay Ice was shipped from Bahamas to Jamaica, to India with same "acceptable loss"
Warmer Ocean Currents melt Ice faster, and only a hotter heat source and/or darker Oceans can result in warmer waters via IR absorption
**OMG we're all going to die from a global Meltdown...blah,blah, the Polar Bears and baby seals are doom,blah blah***
Bears are Bears and the"Polar Bear adapted to living up there...and they like the taste of human flesh...so
Seals live everywhere and the Poles are a seasonal spot
The Mini-Ice age happen when too much fresh water fucked up the sea currents bringing warm tropical waters tothe poles and the cold waters to the tropics
The hot/colt exchange melts the pole back or "icecube earth"
This (Abrupt Climate Change) is what most scientists believe and you will see this being brought up in the next few years after they aren't concerned as coming off as alarmists.
Global warming looks like it might end soon. So, we must come up with another catastrophe theory about how billions of people will die. Very scientific! We don't know what what CO2 will do, but whatever happens blame it on CO2.
The relationship between temp and CO2 is well researched. They go hand-in-hand. Solar shifts seem to bring us out of the ends of ice ages, but increases in CO2 start forcing in about 800 years.
CO2 lags 800 years behind solar forcings at the ends of ice ages. It then becomes a main positive feedback forcing, appearing to substantially drive warming thereafter. Reading is good.
odd how we love our children and grand kids and want the best for them. but we are not doing anything about the future enviroment they will have to grow up in.
Dude, no matter how dumb you are,, I doesn´t take an expert to see that we are rabbitly running short on space, that is what the guy is reffering to. In 40 years we are looking at double population. Besides shitting in my backyard is not vice move there is only one earth!
Green plants metabolise all the available carbon dioxide. No possible effect on the weather, as no more carbon dioxide left in the air after photosynthesis.
JonThm 8 months ago
The world climate has cooled naturally fall last six years
JonThm 8 months ago
Biology teaches that green plants sink all the available carbon dioxide. Harvard University has confirmed there has been no increase in free carbon dioxide in the air for last 200 years. Though there has been a 15% increase in crop yields. So no man made climate change-that is all lie from nuclear power
JonThm 8 months ago
Climate change is a paid fiction from nuclear power
JonThm 9 months ago
@JonThm and you are a paid denier by Exxonmobil.
uknowispeaksense 8 months ago
@uknowispeaksense No. I am not in their pay of any power company
JonThm 8 months ago
@JonThm I was just get in on your act of making unsubstantiated claims.
uknowispeaksense 8 months ago
Anything goes when it comes to scare people off for a profit.
isocrate27 1 year ago
Simply cryogenically freeze 6 billion people. Problem solved.
But seriously folks, the self-contained sustainable arcology is a project that we need to get on. Not just for colonizing Mars, but possibly for remaining secure on Earth.
AspiringPotato 1 year ago
the place looks like a bad science project, are you kidding, we don't need to use any more chemical weapons either
isawanangel2 1 year ago
he did work for the pentagon huh? Well, we know governments love creating panic...and creating methods to tax more civilian...carbon taxes!
jortizz 2 years ago
These alarmists are so transparent, it is laughable. All they really want is more grants from governments. Government funding=your hard earned money via taxes. Who pays more in taxes than anyone else in the planet?? Western civilization. And, yes, it is as simple as that!
jcomd 2 years ago
Is there anything wrong with taxes when the future of civilization is at stake?
AcolyteOfDeath 2 years ago
Update for Tom & Albert & Stew,
I spoke today with an agent from Lyon France.
They told me to keep up defending the U.S.Constitution & keep posting Tom's intel reports with the Qui Tam.
I will continue that.
Now check out the recent posting which is "The Court Case that changes the Entire World"
The agent I met was a woman who showed me a photo of Peter Joyce & Lady Diana & I from 1992 in London.
I want to thank Interpol for working with Tom and Albert.
NoMoreFraud(.)blogspot (.)com
LoveAmericaStyle 2 years ago
the whole galaxy is heating up... that means all the other planets too... is my jeep doing that?
BearWa11ace 2 years ago
this Shaved hippie confuses me... If we emit Co2 we might return to our "normal" climate? So if we dont, we will NEVER EVER have another ice-age or cool period again? It's bull! The climate will return to cooler temps with or without us. This is just change of tactics, when temps. cool down it's actually because it's heating up! AGW-zombies will surely buy into this as their ideology states that Man is a hassle to mother earth either way.
kanalje 3 years ago
The "normal" climate is characterized by volatility - rapid fluctuations between extremes of hot and cold.
Picture the earth's dynamic atmospheric system as a rubberband or spring being distorted - plucked as it will - by human-released CO2. When it reaches the tipping-point, this will result in a period of rapid oscillation until it settles into a new, stable state. Many complex dynamical systems display this kind of oscillatory behavior and response to perturbations.
AcolyteOfDeath 2 years ago
30% of Asia got toxic death from Chernobyl, without theri actions!
JonThm 3 years ago
Man made co2 isnt warming the planet... even if we could double the ammounts of co2 in the atmosphere (which is mostly natural co2)we'd be lucky to se 1 degree of temperature rise... Sunspot cycles drive the climate on Earth NOT co2!....it woulderfull how these global warming madmen try and blame everything on global warming...
moomar1 3 years ago
citations?
hardsofty123 3 years ago
yep it's true. it's funny I was about to write a comment too. you can google: CO2 warming logarithmic and click on the logarithmic curves. you'll see that the greenhouse effect of CO2 doesn't increase much after a certain point. this means that doubling the amout of CO2 won't affect the climate very much. in fact, the biggest increase was previous to now, and we didn't see a drastic increase. the curve is behaving very similar to what it has in the last centuries.
Animalll2003lll 3 years ago
one of the tings that bugs me in this talk, is when he says that warming could trigger a cooling... why??? he doesn't "want to explain" and then says the ice cap melts, so it makes us think that it might be because of the ice melting...hum that's just not true. he better explain that, because his whole talk is based on that. MORE FACTS AND EXPLANATIONS. that's always true. without good explanations, this kidn of talk becomes junk science.
Animalll2003lll 3 years ago
the fact of the matter is that we do not have enough information to make an appropriate analysis of the ENTIRE earth's historic AVG temperature. we have pretty accurate info for the last 40 years, and the tempterature is going up like .5 a decade i think it was, theres a berkly lecture about global warming on youtube, its really informative if ur interested in the matter
hardsofty123 3 years ago
we do not have enough information to make an appropriate analysis of the ENTIRE earth's historic AVG temperature.
well we can see that CO2 levels and temperature just don't correlate at all. CO2 plays a very little role in warming the planet. you say:the tempterature is going up like .5 a decade i think it was--yep but no one really nows if it's caused by humans. in fact the curve is just normal. just like it has done before, in the middle ages for example. AGW is mostly a public paranoia.
Animalll2003lll 3 years ago
this doesn't mean that CO2 doesn't have an influence on warming--yes it does, but it's most likely tiny. look up the graphs: the logarithmic curve of CO2's influence on warming. I'll check that berkeley lecture; but you read about Gore's misleads in his documentary. especially, read about his graph of CO2 levels and temperature--CO2 level FOLLOWS temperature rises. he just didn't specify so it's misleading and ppl take that as the best proof in his docu. plz confirm/infirm, debate appreciated.
Animalll2003lll 3 years ago
yea he did some dirty tricks in his docu. the prof points out where gore made himself look like a fool.
heres the link: /watch?v=vyuKOtIryis
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Er, guess I'll work backwards.
The Ocean Conveyor (collective currents in the ocean that distribute heat to regions around the planet) is largely affected by salinity.
You know, because salty water is denser than fresh water; cold water is denser than warm.
(continued)
Frisbeetarianism 3 years ago
Global warming may be an exacerbating factor because it melts glaciers and adds loads more fresh water to the ocean. Therefore, it affects the currents by weakening or redirecting them, which will change the climate depending on the region.
Some places may experience severe weather even as the earth on average continues to warm.
That's the basics, I suppose.
Frisbeetarianism 3 years ago
severe cold weather*
my bad ):
Frisbeetarianism 3 years ago
read what was published by the international planel on climate control, and the Scientific CONSENSUS that was reached by the study,
not some fucking website off of google, jesus learn to do proper research
hardsofty123 3 years ago
aaah came out as a consensus nuthugger, did ya' now? the consensus is NOTHING. What it is, is an abstract for us to laugh at 100 years from now, just like most consensus agreements in the past.
kanalje 3 years ago
you're probably right lol
hardsofty123 3 years ago
Actually logarithmic means that the next doubling of CO2 has the same effect as the last doubling.
ajpmathwiz 3 years ago
Paranoia is better than no concern at all.
rwtheislander 3 years ago 2
Plants take in CO2, and excrete O2: Thus CO2 goes UP in an ice age.
JonThm 3 years ago
he said queef
kefka916 3 years ago
This is a real issue. Warming can trigger cooling. The fresh water in the north atlantic is a hazard to the gulf stream. Look up "younger dryas" on wiki.
kevo999 3 years ago 2
can you make a video and have you ever heard of depopulation theories?
dellsprospects2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
'Climate Change' is fiction from nuclear power. Spread by teh stupid or theri paid stooges.
JonThm 3 years ago
with comments like that..theres no doubt were skrewed.
RockofthePast 3 years ago
The climate cvhagnes what ever man tries to do! He does not make teh weather, no matter how arogant he is!
JonThm 3 years ago
Lets do nuclear fusion - power with no CO2: See my blog!
JonThm 3 years ago
Wow, this guy is fricken ridiculus! The last ice ages came and went without human releases of CO2! The Earth's climat is so complex that we cannot try to control it. This guy is just a shill for the military and the nuclear industry, which are inseprable and the two benefactors of the myth of a climate change crisis
jasenjoseph 3 years ago
The dee psea gives off He and O, as it xdoes nuclear fusion from water. I am nobody's stooge, I think! Power with no CO2 or toxic death. You onject? CO23 goes up in an ice age by the way.
JonThm 3 years ago
Nuclear power kills, using their phantom science of 'global warming', and now 'climate cahnge': As teh world is so not warming!
JonThm 4 years ago
The only people ever killed by nuclear power died from their own stupidity (unsafe handling of fuel) or Russian arrogance (Chernobyl explosion from an unsafe reactor design).
ajpmathwiz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Global Warming is not science or true! It is free PR for the nuclear industry - which kills millions.
JonThm 4 years ago
The mayhem in Darfur is down to water shortages, and the mass migration that was the consequence. As too, the War in Iraq is about resources, not WMD, as everyone knows. Instead of people being told the truth and helped to change their ways, they are instead fed proporganda so they will support their Governments actions, and Oh, haven't they done well.
It is only the people who will change things, but you need enough of them to listen.
timetorightwrongs 4 years ago 2
help save the planet kill yourself
knowpower88 4 years ago
Check out this vid on human population management...perhaps the greatest way we can influence that component of global warming caused by humans...in the YouTube channel called, "HundredMilTechnology" and titled, "An Unpopular View".
HundredMilTechnology 4 years ago
Um, How is global Warming caused by humans?(or rather by Gas being $4.85 and "Big Oil" making too much money?)
Problem with the Environuts claim that CO2 absorbs heat and more of it would absorb more heat is that 1) Google "CO2 is a refrigerant" (specifically it rapidly expands in the presence of heat and cools the area as the result) 2) Unless there is a catalyst converter in the filtration system burning fossil fuels DOES NOT make CO2 as a Byproduct
3)Doubling a mass drops IR absorption rate
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**3)Doubling a mass drops IR absorption rate**
This oneisjust hilarious...much as the Environuts thinking IR rays bounces around like a fricken Microwave and Magical "Green House Gases" vibrate like food in a microwave and IR rays can magically bounce around off the earth surface and mid air many times to "vibrate" the magical "GHG" a number of times until the air reaches a certain tempoature...and more GHG makes warmer Air cause more of it makes ir absorb more IR rays magically flying by...lol
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**more GHG makes warmer Air cause more of it makes ir absorb more IR rays magically flying by**
This is wrong cause
1) The Heat Source, the sun hasn'tchanged and saying doubling a mass in volume can asorb more heat and make thinks hotter without changing the heat source tempature (the sun) is like saying you can bake 2 dozen cookies faster then 1 and they willcook as if in a hotter oven
2) Infared rays either are absorbed or reflected by surfaces 1x and "Mid Air" isn't sense enough to reflect
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**Mid Air" isn't sense enough to reflect IR**
More importantly the IR absorption rate of gases known as "Green House Gases" focuses on in what is known as "Dry Air" in our atmosphere is, in the real world, negligible. The real world IR rates of gas in "Air" is CO2 1.4f by volume,Nitrogen 1.4F,Oxygen 1.3f, Argon 1.6f,Nitrous Oxide 15f,Methane 1.4f, & Water vapor at 32f-140f based on "humidity" ranging from 1%- 5.5% by volume of Lower troposphere Atmosphere due to evaporation/precipitation
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**magical IR rays bounce upand down to vibrate magical GHG that warm the air blah,blah,yadda,yadda**
NO
1) Sunlight comesin and heats the surface of the Earth and IR either is absorbed or reflected by the surface ONCE
2) the Heat from the surface "sticks" to the air above it based on "humidity", HOt air rises cold air falls,the difference makes "wind"
3) Water evaporates out of the Oceans/surface with heat(make clouds)this precipitation along with different hot/cold air pockes make "weather"
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**Man made global warming is melting the Polar Ice,blah,blah,blah)down with Bush and Oil companies and Walmart)**
Um
CO2 being a refrigerant & burning fossil fuels not creating Co2 aside, hotter air doesn't make Ice melt faster which is why back before Refrigeration Chesapeake bay Ice was shipped from Bahamas to Jamaica, to India with same "acceptable loss"
Warmer Ocean Currents melt Ice faster, and only a hotter heat source and/or darker Oceans can result in warmer waters via IR absorption
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
**OMG we're all going to die from a global Meltdown...blah,blah, the Polar Bears and baby seals are doom,blah blah***
Bears are Bears and the"Polar Bear adapted to living up there...and they like the taste of human flesh...so
Seals live everywhere and the Poles are a seasonal spot
The Mini-Ice age happen when too much fresh water fucked up the sea currents bringing warm tropical waters tothe poles and the cold waters to the tropics
The hot/colt exchange melts the pole back or "icecube earth"
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
From the profile of TheRealArchAngel:
"Interests: Astronomy,Cosmology,Demonology, Life Systems,Artificial Intelegence, Alternative Fuels"
Here's a dime: go buy yourself a spell-checker and a clue.
nowaskmehow 3 years ago
**Here's a dime: go buy yourself a spell-checker and a clue.**
If anything I need to replace this $5 Keyooard from Walmart.
p.s. I prefer Stratego, and board games cost $10 now
TheRealArchAngel 3 years ago
The Judgment is almost here. Watch my videos.
thearmin 4 years ago
None of this is proof..most of the assumptions are false. Temperatures have not risen since 1998
28202850 4 years ago
This (Abrupt Climate Change) is what most scientists believe and you will see this being brought up in the next few years after they aren't concerned as coming off as alarmists.
mattihoo 4 years ago
Global warming looks like it might end soon. So, we must come up with another catastrophe theory about how billions of people will die. Very scientific! We don't know what what CO2 will do, but whatever happens blame it on CO2.
iloveemo1984 4 years ago
The relationship between temp and CO2 is well researched. They go hand-in-hand. Solar shifts seem to bring us out of the ends of ice ages, but increases in CO2 start forcing in about 800 years.
kkob 4 years ago
CO2 lags 800 years behind solar forcings at the ends of ice ages. It then becomes a main positive feedback forcing, appearing to substantially drive warming thereafter. Reading is good.
kkob 4 years ago
if only there was some kind of super efficient human powered transport, like some kind of 'bi-cycle'
joebonk 4 years ago
"...without going into the details of the mechanism..."
weav8060 4 years ago
LEARN ABOUT HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS GUYS.
CupChamps 4 years ago
odd how we love our children and grand kids and want the best for them. but we are not doing anything about the future enviroment they will have to grow up in.
eganner 4 years ago
including you
Obsidean 4 years ago
is that me or us (all)
RENNAG 4 years ago
Futurist Peter Schwartz, Schwartz, thinks in a tank.
777Lighthouse 5 years ago
Act now! Stop Co2!
peonSH 5 years ago
Guess that's why they destroyed all of the rain forests in the 90s. Is there any left? Who ordered that? Hmmm...
ZeauxOsprey 5 years ago
you sir are the dumbest person i have ever seen, god damn no matter what you do you are going to create CO2
god your dumb
Obsidean 4 years ago
Dude, no matter how dumb you are,, I doesn´t take an expert to see that we are rabbitly running short on space, that is what the guy is reffering to. In 40 years we are looking at double population. Besides shitting in my backyard is not vice move there is only one earth!
fladfisken 4 years ago
how the fuck does this relate to climate change?
Obsidean 4 years ago