Oh, and care to share what zit on your ass you pulled that 90% figure from? The current system is a popularity contest, NOT an actual championship.
And Utah can still kickass even when the bottom half of the conference is in the crapper. Look at the SEC. Does Tennessee getting beat by sucky UCLA and Wyoming last year prove Florida wasn't a damn good team?
hmmm...let's see...what should I prefer? A state with a 10% income tax (disregarding tithing) and no/watered-down beer, or a state with a bad college football team that i can forget thanks to abundant/good beer?
By all means, choose the state with more alcohol, poisoning yourself and hopefully get yourself nominated for a darwin award, thereby improving the general population.
no one said alcoholism was good, but given a choice, i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than mormonism/illusionary self aggrandizement through meaningless spectator sports. And you're exactly right: all else being equal, at least alcoholism results in a thinning of the herd, unlike other social illnesses.
Only about half of Salt Lake is LDS and less than that percentage at the U. If you're going to attack "Mormonism" at least get the school right. The Y is the church school, not the U.
When did you say you prefer alcoholism to sports? You: "i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than...illusionary self aggrandizement through meaningless spectator sports." Who said anything about "basing [one's] entire life around [sports]"? Just because the U keeps kicking UNLV's ass doesn't mean I base my life on it.
And you must like cake without icing as you rarely have "icing" down there.
If you need a few beers to have fun at a football game, you have a serious problem. If you need to get drunk to enjoy life, you life must really suck.
excatly, i said, "i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than by...ILLUSIONARY SELF AGGRANDIZEMENT THROUGH meaningless spectator sports. THROUGH being the keyword. I did not say sports are NECESSARILY a road to self aggrandizement, only that they are a potential one. You can watch meaningless spectator sports without mistakenly inflating your ego. They are not mutually exclusive!
Who said I need a few beers to enjoy a game? That's the problem with a lot of people in Utah--they equate a desire for a beer ONCE IN AWHILE to ALCOHOLISM! That's like banning power tools because some people are dumb enough to cut off their fingers. And by the way, I'd rather have cake every year without icing than have no cake at all. The U still has ZERO national football titles. We're equal that way. ;)
Invalid analogy, as alcohol ALWAYS does some damage even when used properly. The same cannot be said of power tools.
Drinking is STUPID. Accept it.
The 'national title' is an old idiotic zoob line. Get your own. There is no such thing as a national title in 1-A NCAA football. It has to be earned on the field. And the U has far more CONFERENCE titles than UNLV and national rankings (#2 in the AP at the end of last year and 19/18 in the pre-season this year). Where is UNLV? Last seen--bottom 10
Alcohol does NOT always do some damage. Many doctors agree drinking a glass of red wine a day is BENEFICIAL to your health. Eating fast food everyday is worse than drinking two beers a day--are you telling me you never eat fast food?
Go ahead and pretend national titles don't exist in football: ESPN and 90% of the country disagree with you. But if UNLV is bottom 10 the MWC is obviously crap and Utah deserves what they get (nothing) since there were three MWC teams below UNLV last year.
Alcohol is one of the best sterilizers biological researchers and doctors have, idiot. Why is that? Because it kills cells, dumbass. Don't open your mouth on subjects through which you were obviously educated by google. The beneficial properties of a glass of wine come from the grape, not the alcohol.
And fast food isn't chemically addictive like alcohol is. Besides, I've never heard of anyone being arrested for driving while under the influence of a big mac.
Antibiotics don't do jack to fungus, protozoa or worm infections, dipshit. Why should I have to google anything when I already have a degree in biology? I get my knowledge from TEXTBOOKS, not google OR bronze-age mythology. You might try it sometime.
Isopropyl works better than ethyl but that doesn't change the fact that ethyl still sterilizes really well. Nice black-and-white idiocy
And beer is pretty dilute alcohol. Its the sugar and other stuff in the beer that is growing organisms. Salt water/baking soda has none of that.
Don't you ever wonder why we can't get high EtOH drinks just from the fermentation and need to distill it to get things like whiskey? Because the organisms making the alcohol get KILLED from their own waste products
Oh yeah, and you say fast food isn't addicing? Fast food makes you fat, and when you get fat you have a bigger appetite. Eating more food than you should in general is addicting. And cell phones are just as dangerous as drunk drivers on the road, should we ban those too?
It isn't CHEMICALLY addictive, shithead. Or were you not aware that its CHEMICAL addiction, not psychological addiction that people are talking about when they mention drug addiction, that its the chemical addiction that makes drugs so difficult to get off of.
Oh, and yes, we SHOULD ban driving and talking on the cell phone and a number of states, including California have done precisely that.
And my point wasn't that alcohol should be banned. My point was that drinking is STUPID.
Dude, what's with the name calling to get your point across? I thought you said you were a bio major? Excessive weight IS CHEMICALLY ADDICTIVE. You don't consider fat molecules to be chemicals? Everything in the human body is a chemical; what is so hard to understand about that? My point was that alcohol USED REASONABLY is fine, just like cell phones USED REASONABLY are fine. Like I said, ASK A DOCTOR (not google) about having one-two drinks a day! It's not stupid!
Being a chemical doesn't equal being chemically addictive, dipshit. Water is a chemical. It does NOT produce the brain-altering chemistry that drugs like alcohol do.
And I don't call you names to get the point across. I call you names because you deserve them. Stop trying to debate a topic you clearly know nothing about.
And my point with the ethyl versus isopropyl versus salt was simply that a substance being a sterilizer does not necessarily mean it is unfit for consumption (you need salt and your body produces ethyl alcohol NATURALLY). True, beer is a very diluted alcohol, but that is why it is fairly safe to have two a day, which is all that I'm saying! And if your state has watered down beer, that just makes people drink more calories to get the same alcoholic content anyhow, which is a DUMB LAW!
Your body produces shit naturally too. Why don't you go consume that? Once again, you make completely invalid analogies. The body produces ethyl alcohol as a WASTE PRODUCT, just like piss and crap. You want to get it OUT of your body, not put more in.
Both ethyl and isopropyl alcohol cause damage. NEITHER is wise to consume.
And you're wrong about people automatically drinking more to get the same alcoholic content. The human body can only hold so much volume at a given time. That's why all-you-can-eat joints don't go belly up.
And what really proves UNVL sucks? You lost to SDSU.
DarthServo 2 years ago
Oh, and care to share what zit on your ass you pulled that 90% figure from? The current system is a popularity contest, NOT an actual championship.
And Utah can still kickass even when the bottom half of the conference is in the crapper. Look at the SEC. Does Tennessee getting beat by sucky UCLA and Wyoming last year prove Florida wasn't a damn good team?
DarthServo 2 years ago
Go rebels! haha. 42-21.
Boston6784 3 years ago 2
GO REBELS!
tomtime08 3 years ago
A rare sight, UNLV scoring....
enriquem2872 4 years ago
go unlv!!
Ddogj 4 years ago
is this the byu game from 07? cause if it was i was their and preformed at the 1/2 time show!
softballguitar52 4 years ago
they beat utah 27-0. GO REBELS!!!!!!!!!
rebelman789 4 years ago
DarthServo 2 years ago
Comment removed
ryanw430 2 years ago
hmmm...let's see...what should I prefer? A state with a 10% income tax (disregarding tithing) and no/watered-down beer, or a state with a bad college football team that i can forget thanks to abundant/good beer?
ryanw430 2 years ago
By all means, choose the state with more alcohol, poisoning yourself and hopefully get yourself nominated for a darwin award, thereby improving the general population.
DarthServo 2 years ago
no one said alcoholism was good, but given a choice, i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than mormonism/illusionary self aggrandizement through meaningless spectator sports. And you're exactly right: all else being equal, at least alcoholism results in a thinning of the herd, unlike other social illnesses.
ryanw430 2 years ago
Only about half of Salt Lake is LDS and less than that percentage at the U. If you're going to attack "Mormonism" at least get the school right. The Y is the church school, not the U.
DarthServo 2 years ago
And if you're so down on sports, ( so much so that you prefer alcoholism to them) why the hell are you posting comments on a SPORTS video?
Could it be that you're just jealous of the U kicking UNLV's ass nearly every year?
DarthServo 2 years ago
Comment removed
ryanw430 2 years ago
When did you say you prefer alcoholism to sports? You: "i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than...illusionary self aggrandizement through meaningless spectator sports." Who said anything about "basing [one's] entire life around [sports]"? Just because the U keeps kicking UNLV's ass doesn't mean I base my life on it.
And you must like cake without icing as you rarely have "icing" down there.
DarthServo 2 years ago
If you need a few beers to have fun at a football game, you have a serious problem. If you need to get drunk to enjoy life, you life must really suck.
DarthServo 2 years ago
excatly, i said, "i would much rather poison myself with alcohol than by...ILLUSIONARY SELF AGGRANDIZEMENT THROUGH meaningless spectator sports. THROUGH being the keyword. I did not say sports are NECESSARILY a road to self aggrandizement, only that they are a potential one. You can watch meaningless spectator sports without mistakenly inflating your ego. They are not mutually exclusive!
ryanw430 2 years ago
Who said I need a few beers to enjoy a game? That's the problem with a lot of people in Utah--they equate a desire for a beer ONCE IN AWHILE to ALCOHOLISM! That's like banning power tools because some people are dumb enough to cut off their fingers. And by the way, I'd rather have cake every year without icing than have no cake at all. The U still has ZERO national football titles. We're equal that way. ;)
ryanw430 2 years ago
Invalid analogy, as alcohol ALWAYS does some damage even when used properly. The same cannot be said of power tools.
Drinking is STUPID. Accept it.
The 'national title' is an old idiotic zoob line. Get your own. There is no such thing as a national title in 1-A NCAA football. It has to be earned on the field. And the U has far more CONFERENCE titles than UNLV and national rankings (#2 in the AP at the end of last year and 19/18 in the pre-season this year). Where is UNLV? Last seen--bottom 10
DarthServo 2 years ago
Alcohol does NOT always do some damage. Many doctors agree drinking a glass of red wine a day is BENEFICIAL to your health. Eating fast food everyday is worse than drinking two beers a day--are you telling me you never eat fast food?
Go ahead and pretend national titles don't exist in football: ESPN and 90% of the country disagree with you. But if UNLV is bottom 10 the MWC is obviously crap and Utah deserves what they get (nothing) since there were three MWC teams below UNLV last year.
ryanw430 2 years ago
Alcohol is one of the best sterilizers biological researchers and doctors have, idiot. Why is that? Because it kills cells, dumbass. Don't open your mouth on subjects through which you were obviously educated by google. The beneficial properties of a glass of wine come from the grape, not the alcohol.
And fast food isn't chemically addictive like alcohol is. Besides, I've never heard of anyone being arrested for driving while under the influence of a big mac.
DarthServo 2 years ago
Comment removed
ryanw430 2 years ago
Antibiotics don't do jack to fungus, protozoa or worm infections, dipshit. Why should I have to google anything when I already have a degree in biology? I get my knowledge from TEXTBOOKS, not google OR bronze-age mythology. You might try it sometime.
DarthServo 2 years ago
Comment removed
ryanw430 2 years ago
Isopropyl works better than ethyl but that doesn't change the fact that ethyl still sterilizes really well. Nice black-and-white idiocy
And beer is pretty dilute alcohol. Its the sugar and other stuff in the beer that is growing organisms. Salt water/baking soda has none of that.
Don't you ever wonder why we can't get high EtOH drinks just from the fermentation and need to distill it to get things like whiskey? Because the organisms making the alcohol get KILLED from their own waste products
DarthServo 2 years ago
Oh yeah, and you say fast food isn't addicing? Fast food makes you fat, and when you get fat you have a bigger appetite. Eating more food than you should in general is addicting. And cell phones are just as dangerous as drunk drivers on the road, should we ban those too?
ryanw430 2 years ago
It isn't CHEMICALLY addictive, shithead. Or were you not aware that its CHEMICAL addiction, not psychological addiction that people are talking about when they mention drug addiction, that its the chemical addiction that makes drugs so difficult to get off of.
Oh, and yes, we SHOULD ban driving and talking on the cell phone and a number of states, including California have done precisely that.
And my point wasn't that alcohol should be banned. My point was that drinking is STUPID.
DarthServo 2 years ago
Dude, what's with the name calling to get your point across? I thought you said you were a bio major? Excessive weight IS CHEMICALLY ADDICTIVE. You don't consider fat molecules to be chemicals? Everything in the human body is a chemical; what is so hard to understand about that? My point was that alcohol USED REASONABLY is fine, just like cell phones USED REASONABLY are fine. Like I said, ASK A DOCTOR (not google) about having one-two drinks a day! It's not stupid!
ryanw430 2 years ago
Being a chemical doesn't equal being chemically addictive, dipshit. Water is a chemical. It does NOT produce the brain-altering chemistry that drugs like alcohol do.
And I don't call you names to get the point across. I call you names because you deserve them. Stop trying to debate a topic you clearly know nothing about.
DarthServo 2 years ago
And my point with the ethyl versus isopropyl versus salt was simply that a substance being a sterilizer does not necessarily mean it is unfit for consumption (you need salt and your body produces ethyl alcohol NATURALLY). True, beer is a very diluted alcohol, but that is why it is fairly safe to have two a day, which is all that I'm saying! And if your state has watered down beer, that just makes people drink more calories to get the same alcoholic content anyhow, which is a DUMB LAW!
ryanw430 2 years ago
Your body produces shit naturally too. Why don't you go consume that? Once again, you make completely invalid analogies. The body produces ethyl alcohol as a WASTE PRODUCT, just like piss and crap. You want to get it OUT of your body, not put more in.
DarthServo 2 years ago
Both ethyl and isopropyl alcohol cause damage. NEITHER is wise to consume.
And you're wrong about people automatically drinking more to get the same alcoholic content. The human body can only hold so much volume at a given time. That's why all-you-can-eat joints don't go belly up.
DarthServo 2 years ago