Added: 1 year ago
From: OxfordHumanities
Views: 37,327
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If Zulu empire would have settled somewhere else than in the middle of the jungle, they might have been a quite strong military power, if they would have given the same technology than any european superpower of it's time.

  • @TheLahna87 They settled in grassy highlands along costal southeastern Africa.

  • shaka zulus spirit lives on in the ruins of what is downtntown Detroit today.

  • zulu had many great proud warrior, but europeans had too many technology and supplies

  • i could not belive the brits lost

  • God bless the innocent 

  • Zulus did not destroy the linear lineage of European domination. They just won a few battles, but in less than two years after Zulus victory, Zulus were defeated and submitted. In fact, should the boers were sent to do the job instead of the brit soldiers, the Zulus would have been defeated without a chance to kick back. Boers knew how to peel off zulu armies without any danger by using cavalry only. Brits stupidly entered into Zulu territory on foot and encamped there with all impedimenta.

  • @powerdriller10 yes they did... the last heir to a french dynasty was one of the victims of their skirmishes... they shut down a dynasty, i guess you could say

  • @iamify

    Ok, yes, the Zulus killed the son of Napoleon III. But when he was killed, there were nephews and half brothers of him alive. Not to say that the real French Royal Blood does not come from Napoleon, but from the Borbon lineage. Today, there are still Borbons survivors, descendants of Luis XIV, including the King of Spain.

  • @powerdriller10

    well, yes of course... more or less

  • @powerdriller10 In my opinion that blood became less royal and more normal when they lost their kingdom.

  • @powerdriller10 And look what happened to the boers when they tried it on with the stupid Brits.

  • @MrStig691

    Of course, the boers would not try  that tactic of hit-and-run on open fields when they fought the Brits, that would have been suicidal. What an absurd !! The Boers lost the war, but given their inferior position in logistics, materials and men; they did a great fight. The Brits won by overwhelming by much resource superiority, but in soldiership the Boers were better.

  • shaka zulu didnt fight the british he fought rival clans

  • Go Zulu guys! Take on the british! LOL

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more