I gave you the location of all your answers, You refuse to even read it. You are a loonie. Go back to your Cocoa Puffs and tin foil hat in your Mommy's basement.
@MonteBlood1996 Please explain the backwards leap in technology that keeps us from going further than a couple hundred miles above the Earth, in comparison with the relative ease of going a quarter million miles away, landing, taking off, and returning, another quarter million miles, and then landing again safely on Earth, which was done, supposedly, over forty years ago? And don't try that money bullshit either. If we went, we would have had an Arby's there by now!
And don't forget, they did it flawlessly. No loss of life. Perfect fucking record mate. With odds like that, surely it would be safe enough for continued exploration, and settlement. And yet the LEO trips of the shuttle have yielded how many deaths? And yet they continued that program for how long?
You are definitely not using the logic displayed by even the most simplist of minds.
@un4g1v3n1 There was no backwards leap in technology, just in desire to go. It is incredibly expensive to get anything to and from the Moon. To go to Mars we need to learn how to deal with the long term effects of low or no gravitty, and much of what goes on in the ISS is in that direction.
@hunchbacked First off, your quaestion is flawed. it SHOUD be, "Why NOT go to the moon if you know it's possible to do so and there is no reason to fake it?" It could not have been faked convincingly then, and it was completely within our technology to actually go. The Van Allen Belts do not have as much DANGEROUS radiation as you have been led to believe. Again I refer you to Clavius.org. Eeveryquestion you have and more are answered there. Of course, you won't accept them, but I tried.
@hunchbacked No they don'y, but they are considerably less intense out side of them. You might want to read up on WHAT KIND of "radiation" you are talking about and the INTENSITY of it. Oh wait, you would disregard all those facts and go with some timn foil hat nutjob. Got it.
@hunchbacked It's an entire wbsite dedicated to explaining in detail why people like you are wrong. But I knew you would disregard it. You obviously didn't read everything, you didn't have time. So go back to your old man in the desert with a leaf blower. I'll stick with scientists and others who have actual, well..you know...FACTS.
I know this site, and it explains very little in regard of all that has to be explained.
It just shows how little you know the problems of APollo, and the great quantity of incoherences, not only in the footage, but also in the technology.
@Mozart1220 It's an entire wbsite dedicated to explaining in detail why people like you are wrong
Jay Windley site of crap is rife with ridicule, but lacking any facts that confirms Apollo. Windbag continues NASA's lies, when they claim no major solar particle events occured during Apollo missions. One look at the link or picture of the recorded MAJOR SOLAR FLARES from NOAA proves both NASA and Windlie to be full of shit!
Oh certainly, they didn't have the technology to stage this in the sixties, but they had it to go to the moon which is way way way way way more difficult!
@hunchbacked Yes it is more difficult to FAKE something like this in the 60's. Hell, thay can't make it look real even now! But they did have the means to DO it in the 60's. It's not that tough. It takes math, money, and desire.
No, it's not true, it's not that difficult to fake, there are several techniques available for the fakery; going to the moon is way more difficult and dangerous; it may seem simple in your mind but it is not, very far from it; it is extremely difficult and dangerous.
@hunchbacked It's incredibly deadly. Without proper radiation protections, mankinds footprint willl never reach another body in the Universe beyond the protection of our magenotosphere. PERIOD. Wake up PAN Handlers....
And landing on the moon is also very difficult and impossible to simulate on earth; they should have had to make tests directly on the moon, land not inhabited lunar modules on the moon till they succeeded, but it would have taken time and cost a lot of money; so, since it had the same effect on people if it was faked, they preferred the solution of faking it (and I am sure that a good part of the tax money went to the costly vietnam war).
@hunchbacked It's not impossible, is what I'm saying, and just because it's difficult does not mean they didn't do it. What I was saying is that we humans can do pretty much anything we want to, all we have to do is want to bad enough.
Do you know that Kennedy, two years after having made his warm speech about going to the moon, realized that it was not that easy and was speaking about collaborating with the Russians for this project, because wanting it "bad enough" would not be enough; but the CIA didn't want to hear about it, because it had its own project, and if Kennedy was threatening to change it....you see what I mean!
@hunchbacked No, I think they have all been thoroughly debunked. Many, many times by thousands of people. Try Clavius.org , or a book called "Bad Astronomy" by Phillip Pliat. Even Mythbusters debunked you ini a way even an 8th grader could understand. Oh yeah, I forgot, you disregard the experts because an old man in the desert moved some dirt with a leaf blower.
Where is the footprint of the ships landing?????? Why is there never a spec of Moon dust on any of the landing gear? Why does in every single picture the modual look as clean as a show room car?
Suite boy is on very safe ground here , of course we went to the moon, but hes trying to explain one point he knows nothing about, He knows nothing about flags waving on the moon, why should people care that you find it quite insulting, have you got a monopoly on feeling becase you were educated at oxbridge, and you speak the queens english, why should anybody care how you feel, a person who has had a very priviledged backgroud, as i say an establisment whore,Dont Be Impressed by the grammer
The Flag should move in a uniform manner and not flutter, they guy in the suite knows nothing and is a whore of the establisment.
Dont watch anymore of this Bullshite, Look at the Bigger picture the guy in the suite also knows about the Phidophilla that is going on that the Gov is carrying out when they Take your child away, currupt and Evil
The Gov and Mainstream media use these Puppets to break down any desent They dont like people questioning
So called Evidance that is that is not real Evidance, the trick here and phycology in this example is that if you keep reapeating somthing which is a lie over and over, you can convince someone, that what their saying is true, and thats exactly what is happining here,
As i say suite boy Here dosent know what hes talking about
Well the powers that may be, who are perpetuating the myth that a
So called terror group are out to get us are still doing it with these two,
They must be Desperate
so weve got aGeek, and an Establishment flunky in a Suite who has admiited he worked for the Goverment ,, to try to explain, somthing he knows nothing about
The bigfoot , the Loch Ness monster, the alien crop circles, the Apollo moon landings,Roswell aliens,are some of the better known hoaxes and stories included in para-philology which traditionally feeds the imagination of the poor and uneducated people.It is not a coincidence Hollywood is making a lot of money out of these folkloric themes.
@raalou Hubble resolution is too low. If pointed to the moon, one pixel is about 200metre. Pointed to earth is about 6 inch. The reason why Hubble take amazing pic is not because of its zoom but it's stability. It can take extremely long exposure (days), staying pointed without moving and leaving all other telescopes anchor on the spinning earth. I'm saying pixel but it's actually more optical limitation then just pixel.
I think Buzz Aldrin should have a special license that allows him to punch moon hoax consipracy fuknuts in the face - I think it should be actively encouraged.
The so called "Lunar landing"is the biggest joke in history. Nations maybe have their ups and lows but nobody has ever been such a ridiculous as the Americans are now.
Question: it took 3days 3 hours 49min for apollo 11 to reach lunar orbit, travelling at 17,400m/hr.but here's my dilemna its easy to map out a trajectory to the moon becoz it on a fixed orbit to the earth but how do you map out the return journey as the earth starts speeding away at a speed of 66,000m/hr as soon as you leave moon orbit becoz it is not orbiting the moon but the sun therefore its path is way wider.i dont know someone help. i hope i make sense.
The space capsule picked up extra speed by sling shotting around the moon. And the Earth/Moon system is a closed momentum system. The speed of the Earth around the sun doesnt enter into it.
At some point that print had been scanned and has since been widely distributed on the Internet.
Troy and LPI officials studied the print under a microscope and discovered that it was indeed far more likely to be a hair or other fiber on the photographic paper onto which AS16-107-17446 had been printed. A secondary mark that appears to be a shadow is clearly visible under the top portion of the mark.
In 2001 Steve Troy of Lunaranomalies (dot ) com undertook a lengthy investigation. After obtaining transparencies from different sources connected with NASA, he failed to see the mark either on the masters used prior to 1997 or on the new masters. Yet the photos on official NASA web sites clearly show it. Following up with the Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI) in Houston, they discovered that one of the prints in their collection was the source of the mark.
I used have no doubt regarding the moon landings. My European grandmother always told me it was a hoax. I thought she was unrealalistic. Afterall, this is the same lady who claimed to know an herbal cure for cancer. After seeing the infamous hoax program, I'm convinced the more dramatic photos were staged. I still think that there was a moon landing, but the footage was probably poor and they needed some patriotic bragging shots and recreated the clear shots in a studio.
@hunchbacked Most Apollo believers would object to your comparison with the father of modern science & hoax believers, esp. since it was science that got those guys on the Moon.
Funny your reference to moving Earth, Galileo said that caused the tides, Kepler said it was the Moon which Galileo dismissed.Galileo was wrong about tides & circular orbits.
Einstein said Galileo developed his fascinating arguments & accepted them uncritically from his desire to prove his claim.
I believe in science, but honest science, not science hijacked by paranos in the government.
I didn't compare Galileo with Kepler who also was a great scientist, but with the monks who condemned his works because it was not fitting with bible.
The fact that I referred to the moving earth had nothing to do with the tides, but with the fact that it was disturbing the religious preconceptions of the monks.
@hunchbacked I said Apollo believers might take exception of you comparing Hoax believers to Galileo.You could twist it anyway you'd like, and make any of the two people you referred to match both sides of the argument.Dreyfus was wrongly accused?Depends who you ask.
Armstrong & Aldrin falsely accused? Yup,Armstrong has more integrity in his hair than most of the HB's have seen.
I feel like Galileo at times when trying to submit facts to a Hoaxer who rejects science as shill/propaganda
@hunchbacked Your statement"Armstrong has integrity that he is not parading like Aldrin; he feels ashamed,& his feeling of shame shows." Those are projections that are in your head and only in your head. But you've elevated yourself to a level that you decide how another man feels?No wonder you compare yourself to Galileo,it's called delusions of grandeur.
I knew the Armstrong family in the 70's,he raised his boys, taught at U.of Cincy' lived on a farm,I guarantee shame never entered his mind.
@hunchbacked For your question..."Now, who can be best compared with the situation of Galileo?" Joking?
Galileo, even tho' was wrong about elliptical orbits & tides he was still the father of modern science. Hoax believers do not deal with science & the laws of physics very well. They pick & choose & twist things to fit their arguments, like your videos hunch', why not show 2 sides of the coin, you only show the LLRV crashing. Why not make a vid' with films of successful flights of the LLRV?
Some films were copied 100s of times. Some live broadcast in video format (lower rez than film) and THEN copied.
Apollo a-nauts spent less than 2 hrs in the VABs. They got about 2 REM--only 1% of lethal dose. All Apollo EVAs were during morning, which moderated the surface temps. The shadow side of their insulated suits kept them comfy.
Film emulsion "bleeds" in bright areas, covering crosshairs.
Live, zero-G TV from inside Apollo, showing earth, verified with weather patterns.
@optimisticlyyours It's a very good life, I don't want for anything. I'm not gullible enough to believe the moon landings were staged in some mystery studio. I'm educated enough to know the moon landings were real and can defend any claim you throw out there. My life is real good thanks for asking.
Here's a theory, the real landings took place, but there was already somebody up there, so they staged landings for the public. Who knows... all speculations. Thnx for posting this vid though ;)
@GothDude4569 Really cause i saw something explaing how they got over it ,if you search on Yahoo ,the van allen belts and space craft, it gives you a answer
If it was a fake then why aren,t the Russians hopping up and down saying that we faked it why are they accepting that we got to the moon first? because we had radars in 1969 and they saw us go to the moon. As hard as it was for them they accepted America got there first, why are they doing that if it was fake ?
ok ..he talks bout shutter speed has to be fast to see stars?but if you ever used a pin hole camera in school the brighter the light is the faster it get exsposd true or not?
i believe its possibe to deflect radiation with a magnetic field millions of times stronger than earths natural magnetic field. any takers out thir wish to debate?
0:43 "people love the idea" really??? do u guys? because me personally i hate the idea of our goverment lying to us... wat we love is the truth and this Nick Pope guy doesnt have it he is another lier trained to missinform ppl and act like he is also in the persuit of truth.
the moon landing was real but some of the footage isn't they recreating some footage in the sahara desert because they couldn't show all the footage of the moon landing,the reason being they wern't the only ones up there.
there were other crafts on the moon watching them.
@sswwiinnccee That's some bullshit crazy UFO conspiracy story offered up by the astronauts on NASA's payroll to make gullible people like you believe that they actually went to the moon! I believe in UFOs too but you just fell for a classic disinfo tactic !!
like apollo is the only time man has ever claimed above low orbit in 50 odd years of space flight - if you cant see the clear absurdity in that - you are even more retarded than you are trying to pretend hoax believers are
so the guy who believes aliens travel hundreds maybe even thousands of light years (SCIENTIFICALLY a proven impossibility given that one micro meteorite- and there would be more than one- would demolish any craft at speeds approaching that of light, which is how fast they would have to go) have been in cahoots with the government in covering up their existence? there's the pot calling the kettle black...?coming from an ex-defense flunky,wouldn't trust him as far as I cold piss him on ANYTHING!
There is one easy way to prove or disprove this. With all the powerful telescopes in the world all we have to do is look for a flag planted in the moon dust through a telescope from Earth. Nobody has ever been able to satisfy me when I ask that question. Anyone any ideas ?
Easy. We don't have a powerful enough telescope. Look into the math and figure out how large it would need to be before you dismiss this basic fact. And before you try to make comparisons or propose anologies, DO THE MATH. Math is the only argument - nothing else will suffice.
"The psychology of belief " is a two way street. There are all sorts of traps built in for "professionals" to fall into- like paychecks and status. Why wouldn't compartmentalized info be salted with fictions such as interaction with extraterrestrials? Why choose footage of a flag being twisted by hand? Surely the interviewee would have footage of the breeze in question- if he was a legit researcher. 21 years of gov. work hasn't payed off in the perception department, or he's still a shill.
Are you kidding? Are there STILL morons out there that believe the moon landings did not happen? LOL You think the Soviet Union would have allowed NASA to get away with that? The Russians and the U.S. were is a fierce race to land a man on the moon. The Russians landed unmanned probes that brought back soil samples and moon rocks, just like Apollo did. Earth to morons - men have walked on the moon, simple as that!
@BbearWARRIOR Yes. ANd knowing deep down that they are wrong, they go around planting "spam" warnings on posts, like yours, that are too revealing of things they don't want known. For example, your post, which absolutely proves the whole idea of a hoax every bit as crazy as the Kennedy nut idea that conspirators moved heaven and Earth, stealing and altering the corpse and all images, to make a shot from the Grassy Knoll look like it came from behind, instead of just putting someone behind!
Where do you get your figures from matatan? No doubt you're just making them up. You'd make a good NASA employee. They're very good at making things up.
All moon hoax supporters and I mean 100% of them are either retarded or pure morons who do not have the understanding of even 0.00000001% about science, mix them with a couple of jerks of the flat earth society and Voila! you get an army of moon hoax supporters,, its up to you to join them...
watch?v=GbJvgqoeFSU is the best video to explain what is going on with the flag.
The Apollo 16 mission shared the first photos of the stars in far infrared (not viewable from Earth because of the air) which were proven to be legit by photos taken by later such photos taken by various countries and space cameras. Oh, and their minielectronics lead to the computer you are using.
Heard, but not recorded? In any case, hearing a bang does not equal a bomb. The building had to be full, for example, of transformers. When one of those goes off, you think the world just blew up. I've been there... trust me on that.
Given that the top of the building had nothing but a horribly damaged shell beneath it, falling vertically is all it could do... where is the sideways push supposed to come from? Death Rays From Space? Imagine the force needed to push it sideways. It'd crumble it.
There is no "dark side of the moon". Both the front and the back of the moon have days and nights, just as the Earth has. The far side of the moon does not show from Earth because gravity locks it with one face towards us. There are many many pics of the far side. None of the Apollos landed there, though, because they could not transmit to Earth with the Moon in between.
What fell was, at that point, a hollow shell of a skyscraper. No way it would fall over like a solid block, real life is not like Monty Python's "Crimson Permanent Assurance". The coverup is how lousy the buildings were made, no strong internal supports as they take up rentable space. Instead the floors were hung between the outer shell and the inner core. And when they started ripping loose, nothing inside the building to take up the weight. Wikipedia "Apollo Hoax", clears everything up.
For some reason YouTube keeps deleting my attempts to answer you. Hubble'd have to be at least 10 times larger to see anything that small, but wikipedia's article about "third party evidence for apollo moon landings" should help. Wikipedia has excellent coverage of the moonhoax hoax.
@Pygar2 I do not profess to be any where near an expert, but surly if we can get detailed close up photos of Mars, we can get a photo of the flag on the Moon !
@ALBIONTYKE The flags are undoubtedly sunrotted away by now, but see tinyurlDAUTcom/knkt2v which has images clearly enough to see the yard-wide landing pads, and trails where they walked. Then see inyurlDAUTcom/mrgqr3 for additional info. Unfortunately, Earth's atmosphere keeps Earth telescopes from seeing the Moon clearly enough, and Hubble was designed to see very large things very far away. The smallest thing it could see would be about 100 feet across. which any astronomer could confirm.
@ALBIONTYKE Oh, a correction. I meant to say "100 yards" across. That's quite a large area, which is why the LM, maybe almost 30 feet across, would not show to Hubble. Also, I suspect that looking at anything as bright as the Moon, would probably burn out half of Hubble's instruments. It simply is not the right tool for the job. The LRO did a good job, even though it is a mapping tool, not a fine details tool.
No mention of the deadly radiation belt i noticed. And also, what`s wrong with questioning official government stories like 9/11, moon "landing" and JFK assassination? If something doesn`t make sense to us, haven`t we the right to ask questions about it? And if the government is telling us the truth on certain subjects then he`d gladly answer our questions wouldn`t he? That`s what makes a good student at school, one who asks the teacher questions.
Shame you didn't question your silly ideas about 'the deadly radiation belt' then.
You do realise that it is shaped like a torus, not a sphere, and it is therefore possible to fly around its most intense portion? If you're so open-minded, then why don't you actually research the nature of the radiation it presents, instead of assuming it's like being close to nuclear explosion. You'd realise that plastics and aluminium are appropriate shielding, not lead as the hoax-morons tout. C'mon ffs.
just to prove unequivocally that just because you used the word "torus" you can still be an imbecile:
the thickest part of the van allen belt(s) is around the equator; the trajectory of the capsule would have passed thru the thickest part being that they allegedly used the earth to "sling-shot" with equatorial traj to the moon. One would have to pass thru the N/S poles to minimize worst of it- which they did NOT. also not to mention, the sun's & cosmic radiation .6" lead anyone?
Assumption is the mother of all fuck-ups as they say, and you have just proven this. Who are you to call anyone an imbecile when your basis is ignorant assumption? Nowhere will you find evidence of a linear trajectory (absurd btw), and nowhere will you find evidence that the particle density of the VA belts is uniform.
NOW GOOGLE "Apollo 11's Translunar Trajectory" and click on the first link, then shut up. OK?
Ignorant oversimplistic assumptions are NOT arguments son.
And when you're done schooling yourself there, try to learn something about the different types of radiation, and how to deal with them.
People who insist on '6 inches of lead' for all types of radiation are simply ignorant - maybe you shouldn't believe what you see in sci-fi films, and you certainly shouldn't believe that protecting people against nuclear weapon radiation is comparable to flying around the edge the VA belts. Do some proper research for once.
You should also know that the Moon's orbit is inclined at an average 5.14 degrees to the Earth's equator - something else you neglected in your assumptions.
yeah! maybe doctors & nurses should quit being so stupit 'nd chicken & quit hiding behind walls of lead whendoing x-rays.what a bunch of maroons.
when done bullshitting yourself about knowing"about the different types of radiation"you'll actually be able to come to the understanding that the va belts are strong enough to deflect the solar rad which is alot more powerful than x-rays,dolt.
1/8th in aluminum & gum doesn't cut it. ask grissom- oh, they killed him for hanging a lemon
This has been flagged as spam show
conspiracy retards need to gain some intelligence!
kasperlives 1 month ago
I gave you the location of all your answers, You refuse to even read it. You are a loonie. Go back to your Cocoa Puffs and tin foil hat in your Mommy's basement.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
This guy does not have the least clue about the "conspiracists".
Pathetic explanations of what he does not understand.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
Do people really think they would have had the technology to stage this in the 60s? I mean we can't even make a flying car today!
mgitchel16 3 months ago
@mgitchel16 Actually,there's flying cars TODAY.
MonteBlood1996 1 month ago
@MonteBlood1996 Please explain the backwards leap in technology that keeps us from going further than a couple hundred miles above the Earth, in comparison with the relative ease of going a quarter million miles away, landing, taking off, and returning, another quarter million miles, and then landing again safely on Earth, which was done, supposedly, over forty years ago? And don't try that money bullshit either. If we went, we would have had an Arby's there by now!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
And don't forget, they did it flawlessly. No loss of life. Perfect fucking record mate. With odds like that, surely it would be safe enough for continued exploration, and settlement. And yet the LEO trips of the shuttle have yielded how many deaths? And yet they continued that program for how long?
You are definitely not using the logic displayed by even the most simplist of minds.
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@un4g1v3n1 They did not do it "flawlessly". Applo 13 anyone? And all the deaths involving the Shuttle can be attributed to budget cuts.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Apollo 13 was just a comedy to bring a little suspense, to awake the interest for the missions.
If this had really happened in the real reality, the astronauts would not have come back alive.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@un4g1v3n1 i didn't say shit about money why the you replying to me?
MonteBlood1996 1 month ago
@un4g1v3n1 There was no backwards leap in technology, just in desire to go. It is incredibly expensive to get anything to and from the Moon. To go to Mars we need to learn how to deal with the long term effects of low or no gravitty, and much of what goes on in the ISS is in that direction.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Believe me, we won't go to Mars before a long long while.
We should first go to the moon...for real!
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked Why go back to the Moon? There is no real reason.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
And why go to the moon if it can be faked and (almost) everybody believes in it?
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked First off, your quaestion is flawed. it SHOUD be, "Why NOT go to the moon if you know it's possible to do so and there is no reason to fake it?" It could not have been faked convincingly then, and it was completely within our technology to actually go. The Van Allen Belts do not have as much DANGEROUS radiation as you have been led to believe. Again I refer you to Clavius.org. Eeveryquestion you have and more are answered there. Of course, you won't accept them, but I tried.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
It has not been faked convincingly since I am a moon hoaxer.
In fact they could have faked it more convincingly, but they refused to do it because they had more morals than those who forced them to fake it.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
The radiations do not stop after the Van Allen belts, much to the contrary!
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked No they don'y, but they are considerably less intense out side of them. You might want to read up on WHAT KIND of "radiation" you are talking about and the INTENSITY of it. Oh wait, you would disregard all those facts and go with some timn foil hat nutjob. Got it.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Sorry, but I don't read propaganda.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked In other words, you avoid reading facts because they contradict and disprove your batshit conspiracy.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Clavius.org is a joke; they answer very few questions.
You are absolutely not aware of all the problems with Apollo.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked It's an entire wbsite dedicated to explaining in detail why people like you are wrong. But I knew you would disregard it. You obviously didn't read everything, you didn't have time. So go back to your old man in the desert with a leaf blower. I'll stick with scientists and others who have actual, well..you know...FACTS.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
I know this site, and it explains very little in regard of all that has to be explained.
It just shows how little you know the problems of APollo, and the great quantity of incoherences, not only in the footage, but also in the technology.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked It explains and disproves every batshit theory you and your ilk have. I can see how you would want to disregard it.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Certainly not, for Clavius is not aware of many problems with Apollo.
My personal site is crammed full with problems that Clavius has never talked about.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked Yeah, stuff you made up . You are a loonie.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
I made up nothing; I just see what exists in the project.
And you'll know one day that the "loonie" was right.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mozart1220 It's an entire wbsite dedicated to explaining in detail why people like you are wrong
Jay Windley site of crap is rife with ridicule, but lacking any facts that confirms Apollo. Windbag continues NASA's lies, when they claim no major solar particle events occured during Apollo missions. One look at the link or picture of the recorded MAJOR SOLAR FLARES from NOAA proves both NASA and Windlie to be full of shit!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@mgitchel16
Oh certainly, they didn't have the technology to stage this in the sixties, but they had it to go to the moon which is way way way way way more difficult!
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked Yes it is more difficult to FAKE something like this in the 60's. Hell, thay can't make it look real even now! But they did have the means to DO it in the 60's. It's not that tough. It takes math, money, and desire.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
No, it's not true, it's not that difficult to fake, there are several techniques available for the fakery; going to the moon is way more difficult and dangerous; it may seem simple in your mind but it is not, very far from it; it is extremely difficult and dangerous.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked It wuld have been impossible to fake in the 1960's and it's STILL easier to actually go that to try and fake something that huge.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
No, it was not impossible to fake.
Damn, don't you understand that going to the moon IS NOT EASY!!!
Can't you put that into your head??
IT IS INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS!
You live with the idea that it is easy, but it is not!
IT IS VERY DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS? IT IS NOT A PLEASURE TRIP!!
But this is something you seem to have much difficulty to grab.
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked It's incredibly deadly. Without proper radiation protections, mankinds footprint willl never reach another body in the Universe beyond the protection of our magenotosphere. PERIOD. Wake up PAN Handlers....
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@un4g1v3n1
Yes, it is deadly.
And landing on the moon is also very difficult and impossible to simulate on earth; they should have had to make tests directly on the moon, land not inhabited lunar modules on the moon till they succeeded, but it would have taken time and cost a lot of money; so, since it had the same effect on people if it was faked, they preferred the solution of faking it (and I am sure that a good part of the tax money went to the costly vietnam war).
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked It's not impossible, is what I'm saying, and just because it's difficult does not mean they didn't do it. What I was saying is that we humans can do pretty much anything we want to, all we have to do is want to bad enough.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
OK, if you want bad enough to jump from the empire state building or from the top of the Eiffel tower, you think that you'll manage it?
One day, someone wanted "bad enough" to be able to fly with wings and jumped from the Eiffel tower with his "wings".
But wanting it "bad enough" didn't help him much; he fell like a stone and could not relate his feelings afterwards.
Wanting something "bad enough" is not always enough to succeed; you also need the possibility of doing it..
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@Mozart1220
Do you know that Kennedy, two years after having made his warm speech about going to the moon, realized that it was not that easy and was speaking about collaborating with the Russians for this project, because wanting it "bad enough" would not be enough; but the CIA didn't want to hear about it, because it had its own project, and if Kennedy was threatening to change it....you see what I mean!
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@Mozart1220 That kind of logic proves that PAN's have no intention of viewing Apollo with a realistic eye!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
Haven't all the hoax loonies been debunked 100 times by now?
Mozart1220 4 months ago
@Mozart1220
0.01% has; there is 99.99% to debunk...good luck!
hunchbacked 1 month ago
@hunchbacked No, I think they have all been thoroughly debunked. Many, many times by thousands of people. Try Clavius.org , or a book called "Bad Astronomy" by Phillip Pliat. Even Mythbusters debunked you ini a way even an 8th grader could understand. Oh yeah, I forgot, you disregard the experts because an old man in the desert moved some dirt with a leaf blower.
Mozart1220 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No independent source of information exists regarding the so-called "moonlandings".
All we know from the Apollo "moonlandings" comes from NASA.
and NO ! other source of information produced anything AT ALL! about this outrageous story.
Just like CIA ,NASA is a propaganda and crime organisation at the hands of war billionaires.
America is the No1 enemy of mankind.
potrodsas 6 months ago
Where is the footprint of the ships landing?????? Why is there never a spec of Moon dust on any of the landing gear? Why does in every single picture the modual look as clean as a show room car?
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrShambolick 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrShambolick 8 months ago
Suite boy is on very safe ground here , of course we went to the moon, but hes trying to explain one point he knows nothing about, He knows nothing about flags waving on the moon, why should people care that you find it quite insulting, have you got a monopoly on feeling becase you were educated at oxbridge, and you speak the queens english, why should anybody care how you feel, a person who has had a very priviledged backgroud, as i say an establisment whore,Dont Be Impressed by the grammer
MrShambolick 8 months ago
America went to the moon just so they can be first. They didn't care about life on the moon. Area 51 can be destroyed and can be broken into.
H2HELP 8 months ago
The Flag should move in a uniform manner and not flutter, they guy in the suite knows nothing and is a whore of the establisment.
Dont watch anymore of this Bullshite, Look at the Bigger picture the guy in the suite also knows about the Phidophilla that is going on that the Gov is carrying out when they Take your child away, currupt and Evil
MrShambolick 8 months ago
This is what we have to guard ourselves against,
The Gov and Mainstream media use these Puppets to break down any desent They dont like people questioning
So called Evidance that is that is not real Evidance, the trick here and phycology in this example is that if you keep reapeating somthing which is a lie over and over, you can convince someone, that what their saying is true, and thats exactly what is happining here,
As i say suite boy Here dosent know what hes talking about
MrShambolick 8 months ago
Well the powers that may be, who are perpetuating the myth that a
So called terror group are out to get us are still doing it with these two,
They must be Desperate
so weve got aGeek, and an Establishment flunky in a Suite who has admiited he worked for the Goverment ,, to try to explain, somthing he knows nothing about
MrShambolick 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The bigfoot , the Loch Ness monster, the alien crop circles, the Apollo moon landings,Roswell aliens,are some of the better known hoaxes and stories included in para-philology which traditionally feeds the imagination of the poor and uneducated people.It is not a coincidence Hollywood is making a lot of money out of these folkloric themes.
potrodsas 8 months ago
FOUR ACTORS...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
FFS Just point the hubble to the moon site and be done with it.
raalou 9 months ago
@raalou Hubble resolution is too low. If pointed to the moon, one pixel is about 200metre. Pointed to earth is about 6 inch. The reason why Hubble take amazing pic is not because of its zoom but it's stability. It can take extremely long exposure (days), staying pointed without moving and leaving all other telescopes anchor on the spinning earth. I'm saying pixel but it's actually more optical limitation then just pixel.
1943vermork 8 months ago
To see the wires of the Apollo17 scam
watch?v=23_QdAz2tfY
MickeyMouseApollo 10 months ago
So how much did the government pay this idiot?..
queenzakiya91 10 months ago
how about this, there is absolutely no good reason for them to lie about going into space
OrogDeMalfur 10 months ago
@Motherfuckerizify
Then you're an admitted conspiracy bigot ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
I think Buzz Aldrin should have a special license that allows him to punch moon hoax consipracy fuknuts in the face - I think it should be actively encouraged.
trooperJac 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is 2011.Don't you think the fact we have not one photo of the Apollo "remains" on the Moon in 42 years is a little suspect?
MickeyMouseApollo 10 months ago
A former Government Ministery of Defence ufo investigator is the LAST person whose word I would trust.
outfromtheshadows 11 months ago
The so called "Lunar landing"is the biggest joke in history. Nations maybe have their ups and lows but nobody has ever been such a ridiculous as the Americans are now.
thedevoll 11 months ago
"Analyzed?" NO. FAIL!
MrTerrificII 11 months ago
Question: it took 3days 3 hours 49min for apollo 11 to reach lunar orbit, travelling at 17,400m/hr.but here's my dilemna its easy to map out a trajectory to the moon becoz it on a fixed orbit to the earth but how do you map out the return journey as the earth starts speeding away at a speed of 66,000m/hr as soon as you leave moon orbit becoz it is not orbiting the moon but the sun therefore its path is way wider.i dont know someone help. i hope i make sense.
azraelblame 11 months ago
@azraelblame
The space capsule picked up extra speed by sling shotting around the moon. And the Earth/Moon system is a closed momentum system. The speed of the Earth around the sun doesnt enter into it.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
hey the 2 minute ad in the beginning is way too long
zeppelinfanatic100 11 months ago
Moon pastry. its made from liar upon liar upon liar.
kaderoder 11 months ago
At some point that print had been scanned and has since been widely distributed on the Internet.
Troy and LPI officials studied the print under a microscope and discovered that it was indeed far more likely to be a hair or other fiber on the photographic paper onto which AS16-107-17446 had been printed. A secondary mark that appears to be a shadow is clearly visible under the top portion of the mark.
CHSarahBs 11 months ago
In 2001 Steve Troy of Lunaranomalies (dot ) com undertook a lengthy investigation. After obtaining transparencies from different sources connected with NASA, he failed to see the mark either on the masters used prior to 1997 or on the new masters. Yet the photos on official NASA web sites clearly show it. Following up with the Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI) in Houston, they discovered that one of the prints in their collection was the source of the mark.
CHSarahBs 11 months ago
Comment removed
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago 2
I used have no doubt regarding the moon landings. My European grandmother always told me it was a hoax. I thought she was unrealalistic. Afterall, this is the same lady who claimed to know an herbal cure for cancer. After seeing the infamous hoax program, I'm convinced the more dramatic photos were staged. I still think that there was a moon landing, but the footage was probably poor and they needed some patriotic bragging shots and recreated the clear shots in a studio.
jayanxiety 1 year ago
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand cut!
hexpinete 1 year ago
nick pope didnt debunk anything apart from the waving flag.
parttimelaver 1 year ago
why no stars in the video?
dismanthegeeb 1 year ago
the only hoax is that conspiracy theorists have a brain!
kasperlives 1 year ago
@kasperlives
Some conspiracies are true.
What about the moving earth conspiracy of Galileo?
What about the Zola's "Dreyfus is innocent" conspiracy?
These were considered insane and heinous conspiracies in their time.
Do you think Galileo and Zola had no brain?
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@hunchbacked Most Apollo believers would object to your comparison with the father of modern science & hoax believers, esp. since it was science that got those guys on the Moon.
Funny your reference to moving Earth, Galileo said that caused the tides, Kepler said it was the Moon which Galileo dismissed.Galileo was wrong about tides & circular orbits.
Einstein said Galileo developed his fascinating arguments & accepted them uncritically from his desire to prove his claim.
Dreyfus = Astronauts
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
I believe in science, but honest science, not science hijacked by paranos in the government.
I didn't compare Galileo with Kepler who also was a great scientist, but with the monks who condemned his works because it was not fitting with bible.
The fact that I referred to the moving earth had nothing to do with the tides, but with the fact that it was disturbing the religious preconceptions of the monks.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Galileo was not right about everything, but about the points which opposed him to the monks, he was right.
And no, Dreyfus has nothing to do with the astronauts; Dreyfus was unjustly accused, and he paid an atrocious price for it.
The astronauts are not persecuted; it's Aldrin who punched Sibrel, and not the converse, and Aldrin was not sued for this punch.
For me, with the evidence I have, I have no doubt Apollo is a treachery.
I don't persecute, I just expose what I think.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@hunchbacked I said Apollo believers might take exception of you comparing Hoax believers to Galileo.You could twist it anyway you'd like, and make any of the two people you referred to match both sides of the argument.Dreyfus was wrongly accused?Depends who you ask.
Armstrong & Aldrin falsely accused? Yup,Armstrong has more integrity in his hair than most of the HB's have seen.
I feel like Galileo at times when trying to submit facts to a Hoaxer who rejects science as shill/propaganda
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
It's because Armstrong has integrity that he is not parading like Aldrin; he feels ashamed, and his feeling of shame shows.
I think that the day that the hoax is definitively exposed, he will feel much better.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@hunchbacked Your statement"Armstrong has integrity that he is not parading like Aldrin; he feels ashamed,& his feeling of shame shows." Those are projections that are in your head and only in your head. But you've elevated yourself to a level that you decide how another man feels?No wonder you compare yourself to Galileo,it's called delusions of grandeur.
I knew the Armstrong family in the 70's,he raised his boys, taught at U.of Cincy' lived on a farm,I guarantee shame never entered his mind.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
I would not make these projections if I had not seen so much evidence in the Apollo project.
There is something weird going on; people have been playing with the feelings of masses; I hope some day they'll pay for what they have done.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
You know what?
I feel exactly the same when I try to explain reality to Apollo fanatics who refuse to listen to the voice of reason.
The Apollo fans have arguments?
The moon hoaxers have many many more, but the media conceals these arguments.
The truth is that it is the moon hoaxers who are stifled and not the Apollo fans.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
Comment removed
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
Galileo was despised by the media of the time.
The moon hoaxers are despised by the media of our time.
Now, who can be best compared with the situation of Galileo?
Don't reverse the situation.
Future will confirm what we say.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@hunchbacked For your question..."Now, who can be best compared with the situation of Galileo?" Joking?
Galileo, even tho' was wrong about elliptical orbits & tides he was still the father of modern science. Hoax believers do not deal with science & the laws of physics very well. They pick & choose & twist things to fit their arguments, like your videos hunch', why not show 2 sides of the coin, you only show the LLRV crashing. Why not make a vid' with films of successful flights of the LLRV?
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@GothDude4569 Cities on the moon LOL I'm surprised no ones told you to shut your whole face.
thespoon456 1 year ago
Like you say, nutlicker, most of them, but certainly not all!
How come the footage is so grainy, when they show you a crystal clear COLOR shot of the Saturn V's 3rd stage being jettisoned in orbit?
How did the astronauts not only survive outside of the van alley belts, but the extreme temperture differences on the surface of the moon?
How about all those cross hairs BEHIND the objects being photographed?
Where is the proof that the astronauts were even aboard the Saturn V?
NASA shrugs....
V45Rider 1 year ago
@V45Rider,
Some films were copied 100s of times. Some live broadcast in video format (lower rez than film) and THEN copied.
Apollo a-nauts spent less than 2 hrs in the VABs. They got about 2 REM--only 1% of lethal dose. All Apollo EVAs were during morning, which moderated the surface temps. The shadow side of their insulated suits kept them comfy.
Film emulsion "bleeds" in bright areas, covering crosshairs.
Live, zero-G TV from inside Apollo, showing earth, verified with weather patterns.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
Hoaxturds give it up already most of you're claims can be answered you just don't like them.
thespoon456 1 year ago
@thespoon456
there are more unanswered claims than answered ones, way more!
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@hunchbacked Well research to see if they can be answered.
thespoon456 1 year ago
@thespoon456
I have contributed to bringing forward new unanswered questions.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
A sure sign of a new Dark Age when anyone says "probably" went to the moon.
12 MEN WALKED ON THE MOON!
IT'S A FACT.
Vivzid 1 year ago
Here's a theory, they went to the moon and some people need to get a life.
78BlueCamaroZ28 1 year ago 2
@78BlueCamaroZ28 wow you're so funny! Please share with us how good is your life, I was considering get an other one very soon, you retarded.
optimisticlyyours 1 year ago
@optimisticlyyours It's a very good life, I don't want for anything. I'm not gullible enough to believe the moon landings were staged in some mystery studio. I'm educated enough to know the moon landings were real and can defend any claim you throw out there. My life is real good thanks for asking.
78BlueCamaroZ28 1 year ago
@optimisticlyyours ahahahahah
watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE&feature=related
optimisticlyyours 1 year ago
pope used to make the tea!
pongoose77 1 year ago
Pope you know nothing ! WANKER !
jazzmanzoot 1 year ago
Here's a theory, the real landings took place, but there was already somebody up there, so they staged landings for the public. Who knows... all speculations. Thnx for posting this vid though ;)
KonChul 1 year ago
@GothDude4569 Really cause i saw something explaing how they got over it ,if you search on Yahoo ,the van allen belts and space craft, it gives you a answer
wllmdnldsn 1 year ago
@GothDude4569 what a very mature answer you have given me if you want to prove a point then being igronant is not helping you in the least.
wllmdnldsn 1 year ago
If it was a fake then why aren,t the Russians hopping up and down saying that we faked it why are they accepting that we got to the moon first? because we had radars in 1969 and they saw us go to the moon. As hard as it was for them they accepted America got there first, why are they doing that if it was fake ?
wllmdnldsn 1 year ago 2
ok ..he talks bout shutter speed has to be fast to see stars?but if you ever used a pin hole camera in school the brighter the light is the faster it get exsposd true or not?
trax2187 1 year ago
i believe its possibe to deflect radiation with a magnetic field millions of times stronger than earths natural magnetic field. any takers out thir wish to debate?
datzfast 1 year ago
how about the extreme radiation??
GoodOrion2113 1 year ago
What a dweeb. If we didn't go, how did the laser reflector now on the moon get placed there so accurately? watch?v=7KkSqVmp2SU
JRBeaman 1 year ago
0:43 "people love the idea" really??? do u guys? because me personally i hate the idea of our goverment lying to us... wat we love is the truth and this Nick Pope guy doesnt have it he is another lier trained to missinform ppl and act like he is also in the persuit of truth.
Sebaztien1 1 year ago
Nick Pope is a charlatan! I used to read his works when I was younger, I strongly suspect he is a disinfo artist
CokeSupply 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
only an idiot thinks they were actors.
yes, only idiots
Vivzid 1 year ago
only an idiot thinks they were actors
Vivzid 1 year ago
the moon landing was real but some of the footage isn't they recreating some footage in the sahara desert because they couldn't show all the footage of the moon landing,the reason being they wern't the only ones up there.
there were other crafts on the moon watching them.
sswwiinnccee 1 year ago
@sswwiinnccee
yeah man the place is fuckin crawlin with fugee aliens
37zeus37 1 year ago
@sswwiinnccee That's some bullshit crazy UFO conspiracy story offered up by the astronauts on NASA's payroll to make gullible people like you believe that they actually went to the moon! I believe in UFOs too but you just fell for a classic disinfo tactic !!
CokeSupply 1 year ago
like apollo is the only time man has ever claimed above low orbit in 50 odd years of space flight - if you cant see the clear absurdity in that - you are even more retarded than you are trying to pretend hoax believers are
spacehopperballs 1 year ago
he says near the start people like the idea of the goverment conspiracys?!who the hell does we jus want to know the truth
adeellime 1 year ago
@adeellime But you don't accept the truth, you only accept the biased speculation.
JRBeaman 1 year ago 2
@JRBeaman interesting point yeh
adeellime 1 year ago
these people should watch mythbusters special of the moon hoax.
scotishidiot 1 year ago
Jaxa say there was nothing at the landing site...
trebleclefts 1 year ago
Trust the government. The U.S. govt.'s conspiracy theory about the attacks on 9/11/01 proves that they have our best interests at heart.
SimmerInJuly 1 year ago
Comment removed
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
so the guy who believes aliens travel hundreds maybe even thousands of light years (SCIENTIFICALLY a proven impossibility given that one micro meteorite- and there would be more than one- would demolish any craft at speeds approaching that of light, which is how fast they would have to go) have been in cahoots with the government in covering up their existence? there's the pot calling the kettle black...?coming from an ex-defense flunky,wouldn't trust him as far as I cold piss him on ANYTHING!
only1too 1 year ago
it was in a warehouse in hollywood now stop questioning reality
Highairboarder 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NASAvsPETE tinyurlDAUTcom/yj5pvba has an image with the rover.
Pygar2 1 year ago
WOW! A GOVERNMENT SCIENTIST SAYS IT'S TRUE! WELL THEN......WHY ASK WHY???
baredd79 1 year ago
Comment removed
Pygar2 1 year ago
There is one easy way to prove or disprove this. With all the powerful telescopes in the world all we have to do is look for a flag planted in the moon dust through a telescope from Earth. Nobody has ever been able to satisfy me when I ask that question. Anyone any ideas ?
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE screw the flag! Where's the land rover???
baredd79 1 year ago
@baredd79 That one's easy, they hid it in the garage
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE tinyurlDAUTcom/yj5pvba has an image with the rover.
Pygar2 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE
Easy. We don't have a powerful enough telescope. Look into the math and figure out how large it would need to be before you dismiss this basic fact. And before you try to make comparisons or propose anologies, DO THE MATH. Math is the only argument - nothing else will suffice.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote I searched everywhere on Google Moon and it never showed up, will just have to hang on till we get Street View up there !
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE
For now the best images are from the LRO. The best pics i think are from Apollo 14 - you can see the tracks left by the astronauts in the regolith.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote Ta mate
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
"The psychology of belief " is a two way street. There are all sorts of traps built in for "professionals" to fall into- like paychecks and status. Why wouldn't compartmentalized info be salted with fictions such as interaction with extraterrestrials? Why choose footage of a flag being twisted by hand? Surely the interviewee would have footage of the breeze in question- if he was a legit researcher. 21 years of gov. work hasn't payed off in the perception department, or he's still a shill.
hozayamz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you kidding? Are there STILL morons out there that believe the moon landings did not happen? LOL You think the Soviet Union would have allowed NASA to get away with that? The Russians and the U.S. were is a fierce race to land a man on the moon. The Russians landed unmanned probes that brought back soil samples and moon rocks, just like Apollo did. Earth to morons - men have walked on the moon, simple as that!
BbearWARRIOR 1 year ago 14
@BbearWARRIOR Yes. ANd knowing deep down that they are wrong, they go around planting "spam" warnings on posts, like yours, that are too revealing of things they don't want known. For example, your post, which absolutely proves the whole idea of a hoax every bit as crazy as the Kennedy nut idea that conspirators moved heaven and Earth, stealing and altering the corpse and all images, to make a shot from the Grassy Knoll look like it came from behind, instead of just putting someone behind!
Pygar2 1 year ago
Where do you get your figures from matatan? No doubt you're just making them up. You'd make a good NASA employee. They're very good at making things up.
ManFromMelbourne 2 years ago
All moon hoax supporters and I mean 100% of them are either retarded or pure morons who do not have the understanding of even 0.00000001% about science, mix them with a couple of jerks of the flat earth society and Voila! you get an army of moon hoax supporters,, its up to you to join them...
matatan69 2 years ago
Total load of crap.
Show the flag video in question, not another one.
I still haven't heard an explanation of why the flag moved when an astronaut passed by even if it was really on the moon.
I don.t think he could have touched it.
How many discoveries has NASA really shared with us over all these years?
Not many.
Do you think they would risk so many unknowns?
TUBEORATER 2 years ago
watch?v=GbJvgqoeFSU is the best video to explain what is going on with the flag.
The Apollo 16 mission shared the first photos of the stars in far infrared (not viewable from Earth because of the air) which were proven to be legit by photos taken by later such photos taken by various countries and space cameras. Oh, and their minielectronics lead to the computer you are using.
Pygar2 2 years ago
@papagamias
"We can zoom on the moon as much as they can zoom on the earth"
Untrue. Have got any idea about the LRO mission and the camera used?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Heard, but not recorded? In any case, hearing a bang does not equal a bomb. The building had to be full, for example, of transformers. When one of those goes off, you think the world just blew up. I've been there... trust me on that.
Given that the top of the building had nothing but a horribly damaged shell beneath it, falling vertically is all it could do... where is the sideways push supposed to come from? Death Rays From Space? Imagine the force needed to push it sideways. It'd crumble it.
Pygar2 2 years ago
Then show us dark side of moon!!
Ibersexualac 2 years ago
There is no "dark side of the moon". Both the front and the back of the moon have days and nights, just as the Earth has. The far side of the moon does not show from Earth because gravity locks it with one face towards us. There are many many pics of the far side. None of the Apollos landed there, though, because they could not transmit to Earth with the Moon in between.
Pygar2 2 years ago
What fell was, at that point, a hollow shell of a skyscraper. No way it would fall over like a solid block, real life is not like Monty Python's "Crimson Permanent Assurance". The coverup is how lousy the buildings were made, no strong internal supports as they take up rentable space. Instead the floors were hung between the outer shell and the inner core. And when they started ripping loose, nothing inside the building to take up the weight. Wikipedia "Apollo Hoax", clears everything up.
Pygar2 2 years ago
Such lame excuses and answers, Just point the hubble telescope there now and get a pic of the flag if its there? and prove this once and for all?
bungit2003 2 years ago
For some reason YouTube keeps deleting my attempts to answer you. Hubble'd have to be at least 10 times larger to see anything that small, but wikipedia's article about "third party evidence for apollo moon landings" should help. Wikipedia has excellent coverage of the moonhoax hoax.
Pygar2 2 years ago
@Pygar2 I do not profess to be any where near an expert, but surly if we can get detailed close up photos of Mars, we can get a photo of the flag on the Moon !
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE The flags are undoubtedly sunrotted away by now, but see tinyurlDAUTcom/knkt2v which has images clearly enough to see the yard-wide landing pads, and trails where they walked. Then see inyurlDAUTcom/mrgqr3 for additional info. Unfortunately, Earth's atmosphere keeps Earth telescopes from seeing the Moon clearly enough, and Hubble was designed to see very large things very far away. The smallest thing it could see would be about 100 feet across. which any astronomer could confirm.
Pygar2 1 year ago
@Pygar2 OK thanks for getting back to me. That explains a lot.
ALBIONTYKE 1 year ago
@ALBIONTYKE Oh, a correction. I meant to say "100 yards" across. That's quite a large area, which is why the LM, maybe almost 30 feet across, would not show to Hubble. Also, I suspect that looking at anything as bright as the Moon, would probably burn out half of Hubble's instruments. It simply is not the right tool for the job. The LRO did a good job, even though it is a mapping tool, not a fine details tool.
Pygar2 1 year ago
The radiation is worse beyond the magnetosphere. Micrometeorites travel @ 60,000 M.P.H. on the moon's surface.
procommenter 2 years ago
or actors lol i think they landed on the moon but the footage we saw was fake
uksteven21 2 years ago
Buzz deserves an EMMY AWARD!
I wonder how much money China will extort from the US. to keep the secret there was not landing.
lemon7squeeza 2 years ago
No mention of the deadly radiation belt i noticed. And also, what`s wrong with questioning official government stories like 9/11, moon "landing" and JFK assassination? If something doesn`t make sense to us, haven`t we the right to ask questions about it? And if the government is telling us the truth on certain subjects then he`d gladly answer our questions wouldn`t he? That`s what makes a good student at school, one who asks the teacher questions.
ManFromMelbourne 2 years ago
Shame you didn't question your silly ideas about 'the deadly radiation belt' then.
You do realise that it is shaped like a torus, not a sphere, and it is therefore possible to fly around its most intense portion? If you're so open-minded, then why don't you actually research the nature of the radiation it presents, instead of assuming it's like being close to nuclear explosion. You'd realise that plastics and aluminium are appropriate shielding, not lead as the hoax-morons tout. C'mon ffs.
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
@MoronAntidote
just to prove unequivocally that just because you used the word "torus" you can still be an imbecile:
the thickest part of the van allen belt(s) is around the equator; the trajectory of the capsule would have passed thru the thickest part being that they allegedly used the earth to "sling-shot" with equatorial traj to the moon. One would have to pass thru the N/S poles to minimize worst of it- which they did NOT. also not to mention, the sun's & cosmic radiation .6" lead anyone?
only1too 1 year ago
@only1too
Assumption is the mother of all fuck-ups as they say, and you have just proven this. Who are you to call anyone an imbecile when your basis is ignorant assumption? Nowhere will you find evidence of a linear trajectory (absurd btw), and nowhere will you find evidence that the particle density of the VA belts is uniform.
NOW GOOGLE "Apollo 11's Translunar Trajectory" and click on the first link, then shut up. OK?
Ignorant oversimplistic assumptions are NOT arguments son.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@only1too
And when you're done schooling yourself there, try to learn something about the different types of radiation, and how to deal with them.
People who insist on '6 inches of lead' for all types of radiation are simply ignorant - maybe you shouldn't believe what you see in sci-fi films, and you certainly shouldn't believe that protecting people against nuclear weapon radiation is comparable to flying around the edge the VA belts. Do some proper research for once.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote
You should also know that the Moon's orbit is inclined at an average 5.14 degrees to the Earth's equator - something else you neglected in your assumptions.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote
yeah! maybe doctors & nurses should quit being so stupit 'nd chicken & quit hiding behind walls of lead whendoing x-rays.what a bunch of maroons.
when done bullshitting yourself about knowing"about the different types of radiation"you'll actually be able to come to the understanding that the va belts are strong enough to deflect the solar rad which is alot more powerful than x-rays,dolt.
1/8th in aluminum & gum doesn't cut it. ask grissom- oh, they killed him for hanging a lemon
only1too 1 year ago