Gould was not mediocre. I totally disagree with that!
He was really good and was bold enough to dare to interpret something and try to play it in a way in which he was comfortable.
What separates Gould from most is not only his impeccable technique, but his clarity. A lot of pianist play this very well but few come close to the clarity of Gould when it comes on to Bach!
If People take the time to listen they here how well Gould played every note. Bach was in his head, and I know not many pianist playing Bach in that way. Many pianist are playing Bach must too fast in my opinion, not Gould: he is the perfect performer of Bach!!
I read somewhere, I can't remember but anyways his dad made that chair for him so he always used it even after the cushion wore off. And it was probably low cause his dad made it for him when he was younger maybe?
@oreas27 From Wikipedia: "This famous chair was designed so that Gould could sit very low at the keyboard, with the object of pulling down on the keys rather than striking them from above – a central technical idea of his teacher, Alberto Guerrero."
I never thought Gould used the pedal on Bach, but I can clearly see the dampers going up (albeit very briefly) whenever the strings are shown. Can any pianists out there enlighten me on his use of the pedal?
Parece que el primer tema se intercambia mas tarde se mezcla con otro haciendo un metamorfosis del primero un nuevo tema surge y nace mas dramatico un dolor tocadlo sentidlo es perfecto!!!!,pero cuando crees que acaba te impresiona con una nueva nota y se complica sin duda es un maematico infalible...une y deshune armonicamente....
He has one of the most beautiful techniques, his hands glide effortlessly, his articulation, his use of arm weight is masterly. Tatiana Nikolaeva, another great Bach interpreter, has a very different style, but one of great plasticity and effectiveness too. Studying Bach does good things to your technique.
He has one of the most beautiful techniques, his hands glide effortlessly, his articulation, his use of arm weight is masterly. Tatiana Nikolaeva, another great Bach interpreter, has a very different style, but one of great plasticity and effectiveness too.
at 0:35. the fourth damper looks to be a bit off positioned perhaps not effectively damping one string. could be off timing for the other two strings as well.
Glen Gould actually was very picky about his piano. He found one piano which he favored for the rest of his life. It was an ~1946 Steinway CD (Concert Artist D) #318 serial #317194. It was "done" with its concert career and was being sent back to Steinway for refurb when he found it and bought it. It was quite beat up looking, but according to him, it was perfect. Reed the book "Romance on Three Legs" about his search for this piano. It's fascinating.
@chopin7tristesse I think that the book details the National Library of Ottowa purchased the Glenn Gould's Steinway D and now keeps it as part of its cultural treasures, along with that rickety "pygmie chair" that he always totted with him to use at any performance.
If you like the "Romance on Three Legs" you should get a copy of "Grand Obsession" by Perry Knize (not sure of the spelling there). You'll learn alot about what makes a piano a great piano. It's a fantastic book.
Partita is another name for suite, historically used by German composers in 17-18c, it meant a collection of European dance inspired compositions (allemande, courante, bourre, sarabnda, gigue etc.). Toccatta meant a very virtuoso piece written for keyboard. Both names are derived from Italian. Bach's Partitas sometimes are called German Suites (by analogy with his French and Italian suites).
A Partita is a little party one has with one's bestest friends.A Toccata (from touch) is a music event designed to display some aspect of "touching" the instrument-- usually presents as a "difficult piece to play and also often to listen to.
I absolutely love Gould's interpretation of Bach. He really understands and feels it, unlike those who play his music as a bunch of meaningless notes!
"Bach is an emotional composer"? What on earth does that even mean? And why is it everyone here seems to deem dynamics as the key factor of emotional expressivity? Philistines the lot of you.
emotional doesn´t mean romantic. i think that with "emotional" people try to say "moving". But bach´s music is not about heart´s feelings. it´s about soul´s feelings. Much deeper, stronger and Universal
@javierleonenriquez exactly sr. this is universal music. But unfortunately there are few individuals capable of understandig that this is the music of silence. Created to exist even with no ears to listen to it.
Well yah, it's not fair to compare Chopin and Bach because they wrote for 2 different instruments. What I meant is that Chopin could use dynamics because he had a piano, and so his music took advantage of the evolution of the keyboard. Bach lacks the emotional depth of Chopin (because he couldn't take advantage of dynamics) but is an absolute genius because he can make a solo sound like a one man symphony. Extremely intricant. My bad on the other comment, was kinda bull headed sounding.
No just no.. Bach is one of the most emotional composers out there, even more so than Chopin. It seems your saying that Bach lacks the emotional depth because of the lack of dynamics. For the most part, pieces composed by Bach have a volume that gradually inflates in and out like a ballon. It wasn't because he couldn't take advantage of dynamics; it was simply because he usually chose not to. There are some pieces which follow a forte/piano pattern like the D major prelude from the cello suite.
yes it is still unfair to compare the men. They lived in very different times and had different intensions when writing and very different thoughts about how music should sound. Both wrote some of the most beautiful music know to man and that is all the comparision we need to make.
Bach is emotional, but it's in a different way. Maybe it's cuz Romantic music is more like modern than Baroque / Classical, and so it tends to hit me more. It's hard to explain, I absolutely love them both. If I had to pick pieces to be "themes" to different aspects of my life, I'd (personally) pick Chopin 9/10 times. Bach's pieces usually remind me of High Royal Court commissions, while Chopin just seems to hit the human spirit (i know.. subjective..) Goldberg Variations. love.
Chopin dominates Bach. IMO a lot of Bach's music lacks a soul, it kinda just floats in the middle of nowhere in a sea of notes. It doesn't pull you in, tease, push you away. Not that he's not a great composer, but for piano solo's, yuck.
first off your term, "piano solo" is wrong because his music was written for a harpsichord. Next why compare Chopin to Bach, They are 2 completely different periods almost 100 years apart. Lets compare John Dowland solo lute works to Francisco Tarrega's solo guitar works. 2 different instruments, 2 different periods, doesnt't work
Wasn't this the thinking on Bach half a century ago--or more--and didn't Gould and Pablo Cassals and many others teach even tin ears that Bach is everything? In a composer's extreme detachment and serenity lies the greatest and most everlasting emotional listener involvement.
Oh Bach is absolutely amazing, on part with Chopin but in different ways. It's hard to describe, but it's basically just the Romantic quality that makes me love Chopin so much. Like, if I had a music video to my life I would play Chopin rather than Bach in most occasions. But Bach absolutely stuns me in his counterpoint, infinite melodies, originality, etc. But I wouldn't have a candlelight dinner to most of his stuff. I appreciate them both in two different ways.
The three "Bs" lol Bach, Beethoven and Brahms =) Mozart, Schubert and Chopin are great canidates too and Wagner, Rossini, Verdi, and Puccini have amazing operas. And then the works of Debbusy and Lizst come to mind too. In fact I think it would be selfish to rate anyone as the greatest because it would make people listen less to the amazing work of other composers.
I can't believe you would be so halfwitted to criticise Glenn Gould. He was a legend and for you to even say that demonstrates that you don't even know what your talking about.
Of all concert pianists, Gould was the most successful at disregarding the specific instructions of a composer and still his performances were totally and utterly convincing. The last thing one ought to comment on is his posture.
How come the guy who basically called him a monkey(peymaania)gets no comment from you?
Also your response in the second paragraph is not relevant to my observation about his terrible posture which is apparently what peymaania was alluding to in his/her comment(posture of an ape,whose brain I'd like to eat whilst he(Gould)plays the piano.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
man i don't even know who glenn gould is....
HOWEVER my partner is a undergraduate 4th year studying piano at the sydney conservatorium..
" basically i think he's position looks fucked as well, My gf thinks he was a legend blah blah blah ...and i think there are to many downsides to fornicating with a Classical musician. but hey ,have a nice day
First lessons in piano include posture and attitude to instrument;this exhibited posture has nothing to what might be considered correct or regular posture for a pianist.
I personally prefer artists to avoid exaggerrated or caricaturistic manner which includes huming long in a monotonous drone:this can distract from the composers intension or aesthetic
I wanted to add that his mannerisms at the keyboard are much more tolerable than some virtuosi who appear to be experiencing convulsions while performing. I believe many of these to be manufactured in order to achieve a visual effect for the audience. That said, when full concentration is reached during performance, one tends to lose awareness of one's physical appearance.
The music is all that counts to me, and his eccentricities seem minor in comparison to his immense musicality. Some viewers who may have been abused by their own critics early in life may grow to have a posture fetish.
I can't believe you're criticizing his position at the keyboard. He's arguably the greatest interpreter of Bach's keyboard works the world has ever seen.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ironically meant to underline the incongruity of the many contradictions of this pianists physical relationship with the instrument meanwhile producing a great sound;arguably is the correct word.Wendy Carlos really is good too and also plays these works on instruments for which they were not intended
@joewm1972 I think you can't say he's the best...I think its individual.. Me for example, I prefer Martha but criticizing his position is absolutely ridiculous :D Because technical hes soooooooooooooo f**king brilliant there's nothing left to say :D
@joewm1972 Gould's ecentrcity was/is legendary and in spite of it all, including how he preferred to sit at the piano, what is truly important is his unique interpretation of the music....the emotional reaction it evokes from the listener.
@samoged Gould was very eccentric. That battered old Steinway and that chopped up folding chair were his constant companions. Virtually all his recordings later in his career were on that particular piano and sitting on that crazy looking "pygmie chair" that his father adapted for him from a folding card-table chair, which adjustments for getting the exact height he wanted. He was unique.
1:43 : Am I dreaming or the piano in't tune properly ? anyway, i love gould
iwannaberock 3 weeks ago
MAESTRO!!!! UN VIRTUOSO TOTAL.
NoemiSaray 1 month ago
Gould was not mediocre. I totally disagree with that!
He was really good and was bold enough to dare to interpret something and try to play it in a way in which he was comfortable.
What separates Gould from most is not only his impeccable technique, but his clarity. A lot of pianist play this very well but few come close to the clarity of Gould when it comes on to Bach!
heslop4 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If People take the time to listen they here how well Gould played every note. Bach was in his head, and I know not many pianist playing Bach in that way. Many pianist are playing Bach must too fast in my opinion, not Gould: he is the perfect performer of Bach!!
abrahammulder 4 months ago
Comment removed
abrahammulder 4 months ago
Comment removed
rlfmoba 5 months ago
All hail the Glenn Gould....the true god of men!!!
erikthev1king 6 months ago
@Francis1930 pitty that you're not able to discuss with me. But ok, see you in hell.
Ben0Bertels 6 months ago
Gould is Gold!!!!!!!!11
abo100ful 7 months ago
Perfect.
pasajero9 7 months ago
I read somewhere, I can't remember but anyways his dad made that chair for him so he always used it even after the cushion wore off. And it was probably low cause his dad made it for him when he was younger maybe?
oreas27 10 months ago
@oreas27 From Wikipedia: "This famous chair was designed so that Gould could sit very low at the keyboard, with the object of pulling down on the keys rather than striking them from above – a central technical idea of his teacher, Alberto Guerrero."
joedotarch 8 months ago
Sorry I cannot agree with anyone.
AnaMTrenchiBottazzi 10 months ago
He sits like that because his mother used to whimp him in the back when he made a mistake.
ReaIly 11 months ago
@ReaIly
And where is THAT written?
joyleemorr
joyleemorr 10 months ago
@ReaIly That's nonsense.
youresomodest 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he was and will be the ultimate musician in human history. He has stolen my heart for ever and inspired me in my own playing.
ViolinJeroen 11 months ago
he was and will be the ultimate musician in human history. He has stolen my heart for ever and inspired me in my own playing.
ViolinJeroen 11 months ago 2
is he sitting inside the matrix?
BluesSkillz 11 months ago 2
this video where i buy ? i need see en mi tv this video complete
bromerboy 11 months ago
he does sit very low...clearly works for him though!
chopper84a 1 year ago
I never thought Gould used the pedal on Bach, but I can clearly see the dampers going up (albeit very briefly) whenever the strings are shown. Can any pianists out there enlighten me on his use of the pedal?
grouchocatman 1 year ago
It is god
ThinkingGreyMusic 1 year ago
@ThinkingGreyMusic
YES, INDEED...!!! GOD IS CALLING US THROUGH HIM........
anaximenis1951 11 months ago
He can play whatever way he likes. HE can.
Darksephiroth901 1 year ago
two people died from the shockingly beautiful noise, hit their head on the mouse, and accidentally clicked the dislike button
askylitdrivex 1 year ago 20
Parece que el primer tema se intercambia mas tarde se mezcla con otro haciendo un metamorfosis del primero un nuevo tema surge y nace mas dramatico un dolor tocadlo sentidlo es perfecto!!!!,pero cuando crees que acaba te impresiona con una nueva nota y se complica sin duda es un maematico infalible...une y deshune armonicamente....
Twjdfa 1 year ago
He has one of the most beautiful techniques, his hands glide effortlessly, his articulation, his use of arm weight is masterly. Tatiana Nikolaeva, another great Bach interpreter, has a very different style, but one of great plasticity and effectiveness too. Studying Bach does good things to your technique.
dialecticon 1 year ago
He has one of the most beautiful techniques, his hands glide effortlessly, his articulation, his use of arm weight is masterly. Tatiana Nikolaeva, another great Bach interpreter, has a very different style, but one of great plasticity and effectiveness too.
dialecticon 1 year ago
That man's Mozart is appalling... but his Bach is truly out of this world
Stymfalide 1 year ago 3
genius. R.I.P.
outsider950 1 year ago 2
Wow, where was he playing?
Is that a room? I don´t see any door, it´s all white.
Iamrunescapemember 1 year ago
@Iamrunescapemember he on a cloud either that or 'the white room'
chrish12345 1 year ago
Gould is the Grand Master of Bach's piano pieces
May his soul rest in peace
alimaksoud1 1 year ago
I think people that make comments that are rude and offensive should have their You Tube account revoked.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
Comment removed
KABRIS1 1 year ago
@KABRIS1 My peen + Your Ringpiece = Perfection realised on this earth.
thelisterinegame 1 year ago
@thelisterinegame Thanks for taking a serious forum and using it as a launching pad for your low down humor. Best of luck to you anyway. Cheers
KABRIS1 1 year ago
@KABRIS1
YouTube comments are "a serious forum"?
As if your original post was of any worth.
But nonetheless, many thanks for your response - you win, definitely.
Best of luck to you anyway. Cheers
thelisterinegame 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't understand Bach on the piano. It was not meant to be like that.
Pilusa2006 1 year ago
:O!!!!
Godlike! of-course it is, after all it is Glenn Gould - the King of Bach's performers.
pila406 2 years ago 3
at 0:35. the fourth damper looks to be a bit off positioned perhaps not effectively damping one string. could be off timing for the other two strings as well.
chopin7tristesse 2 years ago 2
@chopin7tristesse Gould might have wanted it that way. Don't want it too perfect you know.
megagnathos 2 years ago
yeah, that must be the piano available in the TV studio.
chopin7tristesse 2 years ago
Glen Gould actually was very picky about his piano. He found one piano which he favored for the rest of his life. It was an ~1946 Steinway CD (Concert Artist D) #318 serial #317194. It was "done" with its concert career and was being sent back to Steinway for refurb when he found it and bought it. It was quite beat up looking, but according to him, it was perfect. Reed the book "Romance on Three Legs" about his search for this piano. It's fascinating.
crogersrx 1 year ago
thanks for the interesting story. I ordered a copy of the book. Where is the piano now?
chopin7tristesse 1 year ago
@chopin7tristesse I think that the book details the National Library of Ottowa purchased the Glenn Gould's Steinway D and now keeps it as part of its cultural treasures, along with that rickety "pygmie chair" that he always totted with him to use at any performance.
If you like the "Romance on Three Legs" you should get a copy of "Grand Obsession" by Perry Knize (not sure of the spelling there). You'll learn alot about what makes a piano a great piano. It's a fantastic book.
crogersrx 1 year ago
@crogersrx how do you compare Grand Obsession to The Piano Shop on the Left Bank?
chopin7tristesse 1 year ago
what's a partita and what's a toccata?
thanks
charmingemily 2 years ago
Partita is another name for suite, historically used by German composers in 17-18c, it meant a collection of European dance inspired compositions (allemande, courante, bourre, sarabnda, gigue etc.). Toccatta meant a very virtuoso piece written for keyboard. Both names are derived from Italian. Bach's Partitas sometimes are called German Suites (by analogy with his French and Italian suites).
aomf58 2 years ago 3
A Partita is a little party one has with one's bestest friends.A Toccata (from touch) is a music event designed to display some aspect of "touching" the instrument-- usually presents as a "difficult piece to play and also often to listen to.
samoged 1 year ago
sounds great, but i prefer this on harps.
jewish1972 2 years ago
What the hell. Wheres his singing I can't hear it.
TheWhiteRabbit1990 2 years ago
jajajajaj the unique playing of Glenn Gould was his singing. i love when he plays bach
javierleonenriquez 2 years ago
1.48 ish you can hear him
TomPField 2 years ago
@TheWhiteRabbit1990 they had him quite down in some of his recordings.
megagnathos 2 years ago
I absolutely love Gould's interpretation of Bach. He really understands and feels it, unlike those who play his music as a bunch of meaningless notes!
nunoushi1 2 years ago 4
This music is way beyond "emotional" to me. I absolutely LOVE it, and Gould makes every melody sing so incredibly beautiful.
cesmemael 2 years ago 2
I love u Bach, I love u Glenn Gould!
serjwill 2 years ago
Simply Wonderful!!!!!!!!!
puffo3500 2 years ago 2
"Bach is an emotional composer"? What on earth does that even mean? And why is it everyone here seems to deem dynamics as the key factor of emotional expressivity? Philistines the lot of you.
MasqueradingTeabag 2 years ago 2
emotional doesn´t mean romantic. i think that with "emotional" people try to say "moving". But bach´s music is not about heart´s feelings. it´s about soul´s feelings. Much deeper, stronger and Universal
javierleonenriquez 2 years ago 59
@javierleonenriquez Bach's music is the Universe pillars
pepitho 1 year ago
@javierleonenriquez
I'm with you guys
pbpeex 1 year ago
@javierleonenriquez °_°
twooffour 1 year ago
@javierleonenriquez
not always )
rajahua 1 year ago
@rajahua of course not always:)
javierleonenriquez 1 year ago
@javierleonenriquez exactly sr. this is universal music. But unfortunately there are few individuals capable of understandig that this is the music of silence. Created to exist even with no ears to listen to it.
JMHEROE 1 year ago
that piano has a amazing bass sound.
kepler101 2 years ago
You must to Respect bach before You could be like him.
KevinR3i 2 years ago
Well yah, it's not fair to compare Chopin and Bach because they wrote for 2 different instruments. What I meant is that Chopin could use dynamics because he had a piano, and so his music took advantage of the evolution of the keyboard. Bach lacks the emotional depth of Chopin (because he couldn't take advantage of dynamics) but is an absolute genius because he can make a solo sound like a one man symphony. Extremely intricant. My bad on the other comment, was kinda bull headed sounding.
TsurugiOni 2 years ago
No just no.. Bach is one of the most emotional composers out there, even more so than Chopin. It seems your saying that Bach lacks the emotional depth because of the lack of dynamics. For the most part, pieces composed by Bach have a volume that gradually inflates in and out like a ballon. It wasn't because he couldn't take advantage of dynamics; it was simply because he usually chose not to. There are some pieces which follow a forte/piano pattern like the D major prelude from the cello suite.
RedWasabii 2 years ago
yes it is still unfair to compare the men. They lived in very different times and had different intensions when writing and very different thoughts about how music should sound. Both wrote some of the most beautiful music know to man and that is all the comparision we need to make.
vantrifan 2 years ago
bach is really emotional! What are you talking about? Have you heard the gouldberg variations? How does that not sound like a symphony?
thejugglenaut91 2 years ago
Bach is emotional, but it's in a different way. Maybe it's cuz Romantic music is more like modern than Baroque / Classical, and so it tends to hit me more. It's hard to explain, I absolutely love them both. If I had to pick pieces to be "themes" to different aspects of my life, I'd (personally) pick Chopin 9/10 times. Bach's pieces usually remind me of High Royal Court commissions, while Chopin just seems to hit the human spirit (i know.. subjective..) Goldberg Variations. love.
TsurugiOni 2 years ago 3
To each his own.
But I assure to listen to Bach's Allemande from the French Suite in Eb. Very romantic harmonies within, i think you will like it.
kibbson 2 years ago
yea I 100 percent agree with you..
twiltot 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chopin dominates Bach. IMO a lot of Bach's music lacks a soul, it kinda just floats in the middle of nowhere in a sea of notes. It doesn't pull you in, tease, push you away. Not that he's not a great composer, but for piano solo's, yuck.
TsurugiOni 2 years ago
first off your term, "piano solo" is wrong because his music was written for a harpsichord. Next why compare Chopin to Bach, They are 2 completely different periods almost 100 years apart. Lets compare John Dowland solo lute works to Francisco Tarrega's solo guitar works. 2 different instruments, 2 different periods, doesnt't work
Bach54321 2 years ago 2
Chopin studied Bach's music and yes there are some similarites.
Yellottwe 2 years ago
Wasn't this the thinking on Bach half a century ago--or more--and didn't Gould and Pablo Cassals and many others teach even tin ears that Bach is everything? In a composer's extreme detachment and serenity lies the greatest and most everlasting emotional listener involvement.
jblacktree 2 years ago
chopin's favorite composer was bach, and chopin would play only bach before concerts to prepare himself.
kepler101 2 years ago
Oh Bach is absolutely amazing, on part with Chopin but in different ways. It's hard to describe, but it's basically just the Romantic quality that makes me love Chopin so much. Like, if I had a music video to my life I would play Chopin rather than Bach in most occasions. But Bach absolutely stuns me in his counterpoint, infinite melodies, originality, etc. But I wouldn't have a candlelight dinner to most of his stuff. I appreciate them both in two different ways.
TsurugiOni 2 years ago
Agreed: Only an absolute moron would fuss about his mannerism. This guy is as close to God as anyone can get, except maybe Maxart!
indunamike 2 years ago 2
I agree hes a genius, but the greatest? I think Bach was probably the greatest musical genius.
Irshkboy 2 years ago
yes, bach was!!!
davecotuit 2 years ago
with no doubt!
iViolin1990 2 years ago
The three "Bs" lol Bach, Beethoven and Brahms =) Mozart, Schubert and Chopin are great canidates too and Wagner, Rossini, Verdi, and Puccini have amazing operas. And then the works of Debbusy and Lizst come to mind too. In fact I think it would be selfish to rate anyone as the greatest because it would make people listen less to the amazing work of other composers.
vantrifan 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like Heath Ledger's Joker in this video
Un1234l 3 years ago
Yeah, that's a great wise comment from somebody born yesterday.
jblacktree 2 years ago
Who gives a fuck about his position ??!! This is the most invigorating cretive and innovative genius the world has ever known.
GlennGouldGG 3 years ago 5
Besides Bach himself. :P lol
nwshane 3 years ago 5
excellent video!thanks for posting.i'll ck out your channel 2see if you have any of Gould playing Mendelsson or Schumann.5*&Fav.
selloutasaurus 3 years ago
Glenn,you must sit higher on the stool;this position could kill you
samoged 3 years ago
I can't believe you would be so halfwitted to criticise Glenn Gould. He was a legend and for you to even say that demonstrates that you don't even know what your talking about.
Of all concert pianists, Gould was the most successful at disregarding the specific instructions of a composer and still his performances were totally and utterly convincing. The last thing one ought to comment on is his posture.
Burningduby 3 years ago
yes,is he or is it: was he,a legend?
How come the guy who basically called him a monkey(peymaania)gets no comment from you?
Also your response in the second paragraph is not relevant to my observation about his terrible posture which is apparently what peymaania was alluding to in his/her comment(posture of an ape,whose brain I'd like to eat whilst he(Gould)plays the piano.
samoged 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man i don't even know who glenn gould is....
HOWEVER my partner is a undergraduate 4th year studying piano at the sydney conservatorium..
" basically i think he's position looks fucked as well, My gf thinks he was a legend blah blah blah ...and i think there are to many downsides to fornicating with a Classical musician. but hey ,have a nice day
Burningduby 3 years ago
First lessons in piano include posture and attitude to instrument;this exhibited posture has nothing to what might be considered correct or regular posture for a pianist.
I personally prefer artists to avoid exaggerrated or caricaturistic manner which includes huming long in a monotonous drone:this can distract from the composers intension or aesthetic
samoged 3 years ago
I wanted to add that his mannerisms at the keyboard are much more tolerable than some virtuosi who appear to be experiencing convulsions while performing. I believe many of these to be manufactured in order to achieve a visual effect for the audience. That said, when full concentration is reached during performance, one tends to lose awareness of one's physical appearance.
joewm1972 3 years ago
Glen Gould was by repute affected by drugs when recording much of his work;it helped him orient in a northerly direction
samoged 3 years ago
The music is all that counts to me, and his eccentricities seem minor in comparison to his immense musicality. Some viewers who may have been abused by their own critics early in life may grow to have a posture fetish.
miirabilis 3 years ago 4
lol I love how you say his name as if he could see this. got abilities to talk to dead geniuses?
iolleus 3 years ago
well when dealing with this music one is surrounded by a world of musicians who dwell in eternalness
samoged 3 years ago
I can't believe you're criticizing his position at the keyboard. He's arguably the greatest interpreter of Bach's keyboard works the world has ever seen.
joewm1972 3 years ago 59
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ironically meant to underline the incongruity of the many contradictions of this pianists physical relationship with the instrument meanwhile producing a great sound;arguably is the correct word.Wendy Carlos really is good too and also plays these works on instruments for which they were not intended
samoged 3 years ago
@joewm1972 As if there is anyone else who is capable of playing Bach at that degree...
CSPlayerDamon 1 year ago
@joewm1972 I think you can't say he's the best...I think its individual.. Me for example, I prefer Martha but criticizing his position is absolutely ridiculous :D Because technical hes soooooooooooooo f**king brilliant there's nothing left to say :D
XxbambambxX 9 months ago
@joewm1972 Gould's ecentrcity was/is legendary and in spite of it all, including how he preferred to sit at the piano, what is truly important is his unique interpretation of the music....the emotional reaction it evokes from the listener.
Republicrat74 8 months ago
@samoged Gould was very eccentric. That battered old Steinway and that chopped up folding chair were his constant companions. Virtually all his recordings later in his career were on that particular piano and sitting on that crazy looking "pygmie chair" that his father adapted for him from a folding card-table chair, which adjustments for getting the exact height he wanted. He was unique.
crogersrx 1 year ago
GENIOOOO!!!!
mankuzo52 3 years ago
And no humming!
shubus 3 years ago
@shubus but i like his humming! ;(
audreyhsux5727 3 months ago
The word "Amazing" doesn't even sum it up!
Brilliant in every way.
bobandrayfan1 3 years ago 3
He is great, his performance is outstanding
doctorali 3 years ago 2