@brokennarcissist This is not "what postmodernism means." Wallace was post-postmodern, as are most of the contemporary literary elite. Pomo is find now in television and in the crank turners in contemporary fiction.
@MyPointyArrow If you read his short fiction, you'll s ee that his struggle with that very theme was the fundamental point of his fiction. See: all the stories in Oblivion, as well as Although of Course You End up Becoming Yourself.
He does an excellent job of bringing DFW's humor to life. Yeah, sure, maybe some of the real meaning of the text is lost, but that's bound to happen when reading it aloud. But, John's great.
"so yes that's what the bags are for, i'm leaving!" i love how he says that lol. (: & "i swear if you could see your face right now, anybody would know why i am leaving." & "it's us. us is why i'm leaving." he makes something meant to be serious sound hilarious, i love it. <3 "goodnight everybody!"
I think DFW said it best when he explained that his writing was not designed to "live on the breath." It admittedly sounds kind out cool when it's read out loud, but much of the power of the prose is lost.
It's so interesting to watch John Krasinski read this in a completely comedic manner, and then hearing David Foster Wallace read it in his serene and tragic voice. Lends two COMPLETELY different interpretations to the exact same words. One's laugh out loud funny, the other almost depressingly sad.
i find wallace had a troubled mind. he seemed like someone trying real hard to keep his head above insanity. too much thinking searching wanting to know the answers to life stops you from living
hm i dunno, i appreciate john's acting abilities however i don't think this is how wallace would've wanted this piece being interpreted. the dialogue out loud, i feel, is supposed to be a serious man speaking. the sarcasm and the comedic aspects of this piece cannot be read aloud, but instead must be interpreted by the reader BECAUSE the person who is speaking is serious. instead, i think john is acting rather, well, corny/insincere/amateurish? ...i hope i'm making some sense..
"my stuff i don't think is meant to be read aloud, its not supposed to live on the breath" - david foster wallace 2003 interview (found on youtube part 8 of 10)
@thprfssnl1 That's the thing about art. Once you put it out there, it's no longer yours. It's open to interpretation, readings and re-readings, and such. You made it, but it's not yours anymore. That's the cool thing about it, but that's also the price you have to pay when you make art.
It is amazingly attractive seeing an educated guy seduce with comedy. He is so personable and comfortable with any audience. I am sure he wouldn't trade fame and fortune at this point, but he would have been a delightful teacher. I appreciate his involvement in the First Book charity organization. Of course, his character roles are always exceptional.
@FoghornLeghorn55 he is from The Office
amandacro83 5 months ago
nice and cool movie..watched 3 times in webmovietube
RosarioKobylarczyk 7 months ago
@brokennarcissist This is not "what postmodernism means." Wallace was post-postmodern, as are most of the contemporary literary elite. Pomo is find now in television and in the crank turners in contemporary fiction.
Ematched 9 months ago 2
@MyPointyArrow If you read his short fiction, you'll s ee that his struggle with that very theme was the fundamental point of his fiction. See: all the stories in Oblivion, as well as Although of Course You End up Becoming Yourself.
Ematched 9 months ago
He does an excellent job of bringing DFW's humor to life. Yeah, sure, maybe some of the real meaning of the text is lost, but that's bound to happen when reading it aloud. But, John's great.
L0LhahaDEAD 9 months ago
"so yes that's what the bags are for, i'm leaving!" i love how he says that lol. (: & "i swear if you could see your face right now, anybody would know why i am leaving." & "it's us. us is why i'm leaving." he makes something meant to be serious sound hilarious, i love it. <3 "goodnight everybody!"
amandatully 1 year ago
Comment removed
amandatully 1 year ago
Doesn't sound good outside of ones head
PtAltmVansanTarr 1 year ago
Good work Kasinski, trying to butcher a classic.
serpant111 1 year ago
I think DFW said it best when he explained that his writing was not designed to "live on the breath." It admittedly sounds kind out cool when it's read out loud, but much of the power of the prose is lost.
flamenewt 1 year ago 2
ohmygod. Tow of the things i absolutly love: DFW novels & John Krasinski's humoristic voice. (L9 thanks for uploading this vid !!
AngellaKeushgerian 1 year ago
It's so interesting to watch John Krasinski read this in a completely comedic manner, and then hearing David Foster Wallace read it in his serene and tragic voice. Lends two COMPLETELY different interpretations to the exact same words. One's laugh out loud funny, the other almost depressingly sad.
odpunk23 1 year ago 2
i find wallace had a troubled mind. he seemed like someone trying real hard to keep his head above insanity. too much thinking searching wanting to know the answers to life stops you from living
MrPointyarrow 1 year ago
*drools*
minuhroo 1 year ago
hm i dunno, i appreciate john's acting abilities however i don't think this is how wallace would've wanted this piece being interpreted. the dialogue out loud, i feel, is supposed to be a serious man speaking. the sarcasm and the comedic aspects of this piece cannot be read aloud, but instead must be interpreted by the reader BECAUSE the person who is speaking is serious. instead, i think john is acting rather, well, corny/insincere/amateurish? ...i hope i'm making some sense..
carlysays 1 year ago
I can now see why DFW didn't like his stuff being read out loud.
blakiecakes419 1 year ago
this is what david foster wallace needed, somebody hamming up his prose
MysterioUFO 1 year ago
thank you thprfssni1
douglaswintergreen 1 year ago
"my stuff i don't think is meant to be read aloud, its not supposed to live on the breath" - david foster wallace 2003 interview (found on youtube part 8 of 10)
thprfssnl1 1 year ago 2
@thprfssnl1 That's the thing about art. Once you put it out there, it's no longer yours. It's open to interpretation, readings and re-readings, and such. You made it, but it's not yours anymore. That's the cool thing about it, but that's also the price you have to pay when you make art.
bigrobdeezey 1 year ago
you guys should read what was written about this guy on thisrecording(dot)com
thprfssnl1 1 year ago
He's totally part of 'that whole LA thing'
petergib 1 year ago
Ah, the intellectual masturbaton of the brilliant depressive. John, you rock, and DFW, bless you and rest in peace.
gaia1214 2 years ago
Oh, so this is what postmodernism means.
brokennarcissist 2 years ago
I love him!!!
Katiedora122 2 years ago
i agree with kristentucker word for word!
Britme87 2 years ago
I really want to meet him, but I hate that if I do I would just be another crazed fan and that makes me [sadface] :(
ForgeAssassinMovies 2 years ago
He is so talented!
kaykay4c 2 years ago
It is amazingly attractive seeing an educated guy seduce with comedy. He is so personable and comfortable with any audience. I am sure he wouldn't trade fame and fortune at this point, but he would have been a delightful teacher. I appreciate his involvement in the First Book charity organization. Of course, his character roles are always exceptional.
kristinetucker1 2 years ago
John is so funny and talented.
turningthetide365 2 years ago
thanks =)
eztereo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how ridiculously overdramatic.
chlorine56 2 years ago
can someone tell me wich novel is reading?
eztereo 2 years ago
Brief Interviews with Hideous Men by David Foster Wallace
johnkbucher 2 years ago
amazing (:
toughxlovex 2 years ago
thank you so much for posting this!! i so wanted to be there....
carryyouinmyheart 2 years ago
2009. We made the correction. Thanks.
johnkbucher 2 years ago
Wait, is this from 2007 or 2009?
km1499 2 years ago