the Most Important Second ever. BigBang (National Geographic) mutadis1 upl.

[WilliamTyndale1]

Like a frozen turd in a hot bowl of chili, Lawrence Krauss is the epitome of brilliance! Thumbs up, if you "get it"

[jjclassjj]

love the video man

[willbirful]

Very enjoyable thank you

[shellybirdy]

love the video man

[ericajjful]

some really good stuff here

[Kritikoss1]

where can i find the original documanter

[bbokica1]

So what happend to the rest of this video?

[TheOnlyGHOST]

Lol

[mutadis1]

NOTE: the base of the Big Bang theory (oerknal-Urknall) was discovered in 1931 by the Belgian Catholic priest and physician Georges Lemaitre (1894-1966). The observations of Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) gave physical evidence for the theory.

[mutadis1]

When we bump our head, it hurts! That is hard scientific reality.

Relating the BigBang with God(s) because we still don’t know everything, makes no sense. Gods and spirits are fantasies of the human mind, invented throughout history to compensate our fears and the lack of actual knowledge. MM (response to comments)

[shookthees]

Where does all of this energy or whatever the BIG BANG claims created earth, come from? It cant just appear!! Maybe God created the BIG BANG....

[beyondcrowned]

@shookthees, I know right they claim scientists that don't believe in the big bang are crackpots YET quote on quote "from nowhere appears a fire ball of energy smaller than an atom." They say time, space, matter, nothing existed. That what they call "Nothing" would have to be something because something cannot come from nothing. In reality nothingness does not exist because everything is something. Even Einstein refused to believe that the REAL universe had a beginning or end.

[samen113]

may,21,2011

[mutadis1]

Building a chain of nuclear power plants (incl. MOX!!) in a high level risk earthquake area is the same as ‘Selling your Soul to the Devil to obtain earthly Riches’! However the courage of the Japanese how they deal with their apocalyptic ordeal deserves respect and full support.

[impbadminton]

@mutadis1 you're taking too much space there for us to comment

[mutadis1]

EVOLUTION by M.Mutadis. (the darwinPlus rule 1991/ book:‘3 Laws of Life’, published online Sept 2008) Species evolve due to the mix of male and female genes into the progeny. Species evolve (slow mutation) into new species due to nature’s imperfection in reproducing exact complex genes molecule copies. Environment dictates which properties survive. (Darwin)

[mutadis1]

Relativity1/2 (simplified): Ride a car speed 70, throw forwards a ball out with speed 30. Ball flies total speed 100 relative to road or spectator. The car lights send light travelling at constant speed...... read it on channel's page, error mssge here...

[mutadis1]

Relativity2/2: Light, a form of energy. A body contains matter. Matter has mass. Energy is needed to accelerate mass. Towards light speed (c), mass increases. Accelerating a body close to c, would need a part of the energy of the universe! Most probably (full) matter cannot exist at light speed. CERN (Geneva); giant magnetic forces accelerate smallest particles to highest speeds in opposite direction, obtaining collisions; to learn about matter, energy, the universe and the BigBang. MM

[mutadis1]

Science is knowing, not believing.

A scientist who believes, may be a good professional, but might be not a full scientist.

MM

[mutadis1]

As we probably never can uncover what the primal energy (or matter) of the universe is, not in reason not in qualification, some people could call this energy ‘God’. An issue of giving things names. However, in that case one has to be aware that this ‘God’ is completely predictable, calculable in all actions and consequences. (Response to some comments)

MM

[mutadis1]

From Einstein’s formulas: the mass of matter increases to infinity if it reaches the velocity of light. So, matter cannot exist. (Infinity, does not exist) Matter”could” transform into energy.

Better you address to specialists. I only returned to my early fascination for the universe, because I deduced some chilling basic rules, that control everyone’s daily life. Some ideas might still be unknown or not accepted. (3 laws of life synopsis) MM – Response to comment.

[HALOvsCOD895]

WOW this is sad.NERDS

[stickfigureslayer1]

@HALOvsCOD895 jerk

[HALOvsCOD895]

@stickfigureslayer1 HEY my bad but it is just my opinion ok,so dont go around my back and call me a jerk just because i spoke my mind.SEE UR THE JERK.

[tasneefm]

Thanks for the upload. Is there a part 2?

[CsReLaX]

If the universe is expanding then wouldn't we be moving along as well? Unless they are saying we are the center of the universe....

[vrcraft]

Calling them expanding or collapsing from and towards us is like calling ourselves the center of universe. They say is expanding.......I say they move and what they see as expanding are old projections of distant objects that are long gone from that place. So, probably is normal to appear red, after all their light trace is quite distorted and red seems to be the toughest light wave length, the others got lost on the way or absorbed. Big bang just sucks big time.

[vrcraft]

The big bang theory is so very narrow minded, like calling the world flat. Things are moving, not collapsing, not expanding.

[mutadis1]

Simple primal economy. M.Mutadis

As Einstein told: matter and energy are same things but under a different appearance.

Money is but a credit for labour. The cost to pay is fundamentally only the price of the labour or the energy. Labour and energy are same things, depending contemporary conditions. Read my book.

[AIMASTAN]

Religion is man made-We use man created equations to explain the universe..and say we are right...Big Bang theory misses one important question where did the initial matter that exploded come from...and to say there was nothing and then BOOM everything!!??? If there was nothing then there would most likely be nothing. there is no way we can say space has a limit of available space. We are just here on this planet with ?'s that we may never answer so Im going to go ahead and enjoy my life.

[mutadis1]

The Bubble Theory. M.Mutadis: Suppose the expanding universe is inside a bubble of energy. A field of a faraway, immeasurable, unknown kind of primal energy which accelerates by attractive force all matter and energy at the borders of the universe. When it gets overloaded it burst into one point, such as the Big Bang. In one point? Because the lightspeed is a transition point, on where no matter, no dimensions and no time can exist.

[theshadow170y]

So everything comes from nowhere....pfff

[Zurround100]

I am not buying it lovesthesound777 why can't we just have infinite empty black space and then the explosion of matter and energy in it? space cannot not (double negative) exist because its geometry which is a MATHEMATICAL concept, its like saying before the universe started 2 times 2 does not equal 4?

[mutadis1]

Space? Simple logic. We live in a 3-dimensional space, we can move in 3 directions. Matter creates space. The internal nuclear forces hold distances between all components; electrons, protons, atoms, molecules in all materials. In an accelerated expanding universe, all matter will disappear when it reach the light speed. If all matter is gone, no dimensions are left and space does not exist at that point. (response to comment)

[theshadow170y]

@mutadis1 I know that the expansion speed of the Universe is decreasing...So we could think that the Universe will contract in the future or simply stop expanding.

[utubeaccntko]

@theshadow170y really? not trying to be rude, but last i heard it was increasing.

[theshadow170y]

@utubeaccntko that's what I learned in High School. I am not sure of that one :)

[agrigoras]

@theshadow170y

On Known Universe (NatGeo documentary) they said the rate of expansion is actually increasing

[JeremieRoy]

@mutadis1 , when reaching the speed of light, matter disapear but still exist, doesn't it?

[BlackFox0911]

@lovethesound777 - the Big Bang Theory violates the laws of Thermodynamics, the laws of mechanical energy, quantum and molecular physics, chemistry, to name a few. Another thing: anthropologists are interested in connecting humans back to apes, but I'm more interested in the next link in the backward chain. What did apes evolve from and what would their sub-evolutions look like

[luwiz]

so where does the energy come from?

[Zurround100]

I dont get how space cannot exist since space is geometry its math so how could it ever not exist.

[lovethesound777]

@Zurround100 Its beyond our comprehension

[bboyloco3]

i personal think there were infinite universe before ours because if you look at everything in the universe its a cycle so the universe must be a cycle once one universe is destroyed a second big bang come then over and over and over.

[mutadis1]

Note: some ‘MUTADIS’ statements are logical deductions, filling up some black holes in scientific knowledge. Don’t take them for granted, also don’t reject them before scientists bring us more plausible knowledge.

[mutadis1]

,,,before BigBang there was nothing? Quote from video. Sounds like…and God created the Cosmos! There is a danger in mixing science with fantasies. So, we give the scientists some (FREE) support. Before: no matter, so no forces/energy related to this matter, so no space present. A ‘DARKER’ energy must be present emerging the BB. If energy doesn’t need space, it was there. If energy needs space it was/is in another dimension (space), inducing the BB + our actual space. MM (response to comments)

[wackyrhose]

@mutadis1

No, God is not fantasy- He exists! =)

Science (scientists) is/are needed to prove that God exists. Even though you, scientists/genius, know everything, you will never know about important some thing- where we came from? where does the star w/c causes the explosion came from? where do oxygen and hydrogen(?) came from before the big explosion?

Who can explain about everything?

God Bless =)

[mutadis1]

We added a response about the Mutadis’s ’Simplified Cosmos Cycle Principle’,

in the video description window above.

(response to comment)

[micheals1992]

- (assuming theres been more then 1 big bang and the laws of physics are written at the point of the big bang eg speed of light, rate time passes etc)

[micheals1992]

its very hard to believe that the laws of physics didnt exist befor the big bang. doesnt that mean if your able to break the speed of light you would be able to reach the edge of time? (the distance light has traveled since the big bang) like an ever expanding bubble where time and the laws of physics doesnt exist outside that bubble? what would happen if 2 of these bubble expanded/crashed into each other and the laws of physics was different? -

[mutadis1]

As mentioned in the video description note: Before the BigBang, there was the concentrated energy of the total universe in a non-existing space (because no dimensional matter present). Matter and energy are same things but under a different form (Einstein). Explosions create particles = building blocks. Most probably life emerged as result of volcanic explosions, which also put CO2 in the atmosphere, the basic fuel (carbon) for all evolved life on earth.

(response to comment)

[BlackFox0911]

Big Bang Theory = a massive explosion that gave rise to the universe.

(1) Explosive reactions require combustible ingredients and activation energy to begin the processes of combustion. Since nothing existed before the big bang started everything, where were the ingredients and activation energy before the explosion?

(2) Explosions usually destroy the surrounding environment, not create it.

And people say Creationism is a preposterous theory that defies the laws of science

[lovethesound777]

@BlackFox0911 Right with you man. Or woman. Haha

[mutadis1]

Basic chemistry: Atoms smallest parts of elements as, oxygen, iron, etc. Presented as small electrons rotating around an heavier core. Some have too many electrons, some too less. If those meet, they are attracted to each other, forming molecules, smallest parts of materials simple as water, up to the most complicated. The same fundamental ‘soft nuclear force’, made our evolved utmost complex genetic molecules. The ‘memory molecules’ that enable organisms to live, grow, eat, talk, think, love..

[mutadis1]

Comparing the human genius with a piece of stone may sound ridiculous.

But, our thinking is caged within the human scale. Even human evolution and performances are neglectable, dimensional and on time base, in the scale of our universe. However, a common rock you find on your path, consisting of simple and dead material, ran through an evolution of a similar time scale as the universe.

[mutadis1]

Fundamentally, we people don’t differ from a piece of Stone.

We are but molecular robots, products of the BigBang, shaped by evolution on macro as well as on molecular level. We will be able to decode the cycle of emerging and disappearing of our universe. The meaning of the force behind it, we most probably cannot discover. Some will introduce there the divine force. Science as well as any Divinity are but inventions of the human mind. M.Mutadis

[IceMakKneeGrows]

Who is the asian man? I see him everywhere.

[exavian1]

@IceMakKneeGrows Michio Kaku

[SilverGunZoO]

Without the big bang I couldn't be epic as I am xD

[mutadis1]

If we are able to retrieve the National Geographic video about "The End of the Universe", I will deduce in a clip the most plausible out of the three current theories, about the beginning (origin) and ending of the universe. MM

[MrZetruth]

absolutely fascinating....what we need to find out is what started the bing bang or pre bing bang that could teach us alot..

[airzero11211]

When they said that there was nothing before the Big Bang exploded then how did the big bang form??? if there was no matter or energy???

[RandomTrollAccount]

@airzero11211

you obviously need to do more reading... use the internet other than watch youtube vids dumbass

[lovethesound777]

Damn.. this video is retarded. I stopped watching after the "out of no where came blah blah blah" im really suprized people actually believe this. Theres too much to life to think that we are here by "accident"

[BROWNVBOARD]

@lovethesound777 Yes, because some entity creating the universe through spoken words is so much more believable.

[lovethesound777]

@BROWNVBOARD Lol makes more sence then saying everything created itself.

[BROWNVBOARD]

@lovethesound777 Lol, no it doesn't. If you didn't watch the whole thing, you can't say anything about it. You're delusional. Who created God?

[luwiz]

@lovethesound777 for real they reject religious fact but believed in this "out no where" just like Einstien said "religion without science is blind,science without religion is lame" ^_^

[Frottjeif]

@luwiz There is no religious fact. There is religous faith. No faith has any more reason to be true than any other faith. The flying green monkey could've been the creator just as much as any of the thousands of version of the Christian God.

[davespark10]

nope god made the earth.... im just kidding im not that ignorant iknow universal was created like this but iknow god exist... There has to be more to life, there just has to be.

[RandomTrollAccount]

@davespark10

keep telling yourself that.

[davespark10]

@RandomTrollAccount i will keep telling myself that... i not going to believe all the shit out there. The universe is to big to say there is not something...

[Lilarcors]

Excuse me, could you tell me what this program or Episode is called. I would love to know that.

[mutadis1]

The Truth is as simple as Einstein's Formula.

There Was the BigBang.

There Is the evolving development of the BigBang.

That is all!

Think about that, when you try to solve 'the Secrets of Life'.

MMutadis

[uja11]

What if it wasn't a ''Big Bang'', but a

''Big Burst''?

[mutadis1]

IMPORTANT NOTE

We wrote an important note in the video info window. Click on 'more info' beside the video icon.

[DJLoPaTa2005]

excellent, put the whole if you have it

[mutadis1]

Time fails, maybe later.

[Mawyn89]

WTB torrent for this episode!