Global warming proof

[Bristow42]

Gee the north pole has a forest fire, where trees grow, so that is your proof of global warming. That it was summer and the snow has melted. Lots of dry grass around. I bet they don't have car crashes in the North Pole either. It was Alaska not the north pole, but I guess it makes your arguement sound better.

[spreckt]

I'm convince! The hottness is incredible! Your right the cold is very warm errrr.... the warm is very cold I mean like you know . warmcold right? uh? yea.... praise be to Al.

[danetrain0101]

We need to spread this news around to the masses!!! I'm so shocked that the conservative media is not showing this. The liberals where right all along. Praise Al Gore, our Lord and savior.

[Bristow42]

@danetrain0101 Your right, forest fire in Alaska, all those trees burning in the middle of spring. With all the dry grass and fuel around to burn. It must be global warming. Because forest fires only happen South of the Canadian boarder. Global warming is so bad in the north pole its causing the curtains to fad. Its even getting in the water supply. In fact you can send me the money you will be paying the Rothschilds in carbon taxes.

[LetTheChaosRayne]

there is no such thing as global warming, just cuz some fucking american hick motha fucker, drew a chart showing "PROOF" of global warming, i can draw charts to, they proove nothing, that is just a cow in the dessert, and those Asians at the NORTH POLE, just in there back yard burning the grass if u belieave in this or in god you are fucking retarded!!! think for a minute..... or if your american for a day. oh yeah 9/11 was an inside job stupid hicks watch zeitgeist on google videos dumb hicks

[hanzie113]

YAY someone with common sense

[hanzie113]

ok this isn't any sort of proof, I want to see solid proof that CO^2 causes Global warming. Here is a way: take 2 aquariums, and seal them, but before you do, put CO^2 in one by placing a burning candle in it and a thermometer in each. the candle will eat away at the O^2 and then we have CO^2. now put them in sunlight and one should warm up ALOT faster (because technichally, the amount of CO^2 in one is extreme)

PS: it doesn't

[Jugheadr2]

Do you deny that the 1965 Mustang was built in 1965?

[simpsonman100]

lol are you actually arrogant enough to challenge a community of thousands of scientists, decades of research, and a theory that still hasn't been debunked with your little at home school experiment. all you've proved is the size of your ego!

[feedmytube]

in what way is a glass box the same as the earth?

[hanzie113]

it is the same as the atmosphere

[feedmytube]

no it just isn't

[hanzie113]

even though global warming is real

it is, and "just" isn't a very good reference

[feedmytube]

do you have any concept of the english language?

in what way is "just" a reference to anything?

it's pretty simple to understand if you stop being so ignorant, THE EARTH IS NOT LIKE A GLASS BOX.

[hanzie113]

a segment of the earths atmosphere demonstrated on a small scale is a contained isolating area with access to sunlight, so its a glass box, and if you consider English to be too inefficient we could continue this discussion in french or german, your choice

[feedmytube]

it is not a segment of the earths atmosphere if you completely fill it with

co2 and there are other things you need to think about like the actuall earth wich absorbs heat and reflects heat back into the atmosphere.

and are you trying to show off by saying you can speek french and german??

[hanzie113]

other things to think about? no, here people are worried about CO^2 and that's it, Al Gore was only concerned with CO^2 and the political debates are about CO^2 footprints

PS: I do not speak french or german, only that I know 2 good translators, btw why do you insist on insulting people? I have yet to call you anything evem though you insist on pushing arrogance upon me, I'm not challenging anyone I'm just saying I want practical proof, not proof made by people hired to make it true

[feedmytube]

when did i insult you?

and what are you talking about with the heat reflecting substances

[hanzie113]

to quote the great thinker, you, here it is "absorbs heat and reflects heat back into the atmosphere." reflecting is something I'd like to see.

You insult me by assuming I'm too stupid to understand english, I'm sorry but that's the language we are speaking, ya I get it, I understand english. but you seem to not want to communicate in that form so you call me arrogant. it is an enigmatic situation

PS (this is unrelated) how fast does an electron move in the electron clouds of atoms?

[hanzie113]

heat reflecting substances? those look interesting, could you tell me more about those things, with that I could cook an egg across a room by projecting the heat of my stove! this seams very interesting

[feedmytube]

are you saying that nothing reflects heat?

[hanzie113]

you have an example? because as far as I know there are no substances that magically reflect heat without warming up.

[feedmytube]

oh my god i hate talking to you you are so stupid! if you read the original comment i left about this subect of reflecting heat i also said that the earth absorbs heat. the earth does not absorb 100% of all heat obviously it reflects some heat back into the atmosphere. stop argueing with me now, you will not get a reply because you don't deserve one.

[hanzie113]

And that means I won the argument, you could have been a bit more mature about it but all in all this shows I won. Thanks arguing was fun hope to do it again sometime.

[feedmytube]

what did you win dumbest person on youtube award?

[hanzie113]

yup you got beaten in an argument with the dumbest person on youtube (sarcasm, I'm probably like 10thXD), gimme a break I'm in grade 8 and do not wanna take shit from someone who does not understand that there are no "heat reflection" substances, and next time when you finnallly agree to shut your trap, do please shut it.

[LetTheChaosRayne]

were you talking to me?

[hanzie113]

nope, to "feedmytube", sorry if I replied to the wrong person, good comment before!

The reason being that he thinks that reflecting light is the same as reflecting heat, granted there is such a thing as radiated heat, but we are not talking about ice, the argument was about CO^2 and as far as I know, CO^2 (a clear gas) in no way magically inhibits light being reflected

[feedmytube]

when did i say co2 inhibits light being reflected?

[feedmytube]

so you've never heard of a mirror?

[hanzie113]

yes I have! but you are saying that CO^2 is causing this, when it in now way (as you say yourself) inhibits light from being reflected. therefore CO^2 cannot possibly be the cause of global warming with your logic

[feedmytube]

lmao you are terrible at argueing!

i never said co2 does anything...this arguement started when you said a fish tank with a candle will be the perfect example of the earth .

you failed. just accept it.

[hanzie113]

if i failed so bad, prove it, you've been avoiding the issue pulling in the effect of CO^2 and so on, the fact is; air is air, and its always the same. from shang hai to new york, the air is the same! how is a fishtank any different than a section of air? its not. air is air, all air is the same :

76% nitrogen

21% Oxygen

1%argon

and 2%other

and you can change O with CO^2, with that you can prove whether or not this has any effect

[feedmytube]

second of all, not that it matters but many parts of the world have slightly different measurements of nitrogen, co2 and so forth. for example in the 2008 olympics beijing had to introduce new rules to cut back polution because the air was so full of polutants so "air is air" means nothing.

[hanzie113]

the mention in 2008 refers soley to smog, something that exists very very VERY little in the atmosphere and is only in the bottom layer of the atmosphere.

look, all I'm trying to say is that "stop ripping on CO^2" but you seem incapable of saying anything (or anything intelligent) on the subject of CO^2. Everything else, fine! its real! but its not human induced CO^2!

Furthermore, you are probably gonna say something along the lines of "specialized scientists researched..." please see response

[feedmytube]

why would i say "specialized scientists researched"?

i'm bored with you now you just clearly don't understand how the earth and the atmosphere could possibly be connected so for that reason i'm going to ignore you.

[feedmytube]

oh my god you are just coming up with more and more pathetic answers.

first of all taking a test in one square meter of air does not come up with the same results as measuring the tempersture of the atmosphere.

and in this magical fish tank of yours that can mimic the atmosphere where is the earth? without the earth what is the point of this test?

[hanzie113]

Quit changing the subject! again, second time now

you seem to be incapable of understanding! this is what I am testing for, the air's pollution! The point of this experiment is to show that CO^2 does not affect anything at all, furthermore the small volume accounts for the high concentration of CO^2 which in that area would be upwards of 24% of the atmosphere's weight, so many times the amount of CO^2. I have no idea where the earth had any affect! this is only to disprove CO^2 being the cause

[fithdimension]

This guy is just that, looney tunes!!

[Jugheadr2]

Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding, widespread species loss and major disruptions of weather patterns in the near future.

[DarcPrynce]

I hear that global warming is causing Al Gore to retain water at an alarming rate.

[feedmytube]

but isn't most of the ice caps in the north underwater? so if it melts shouldnt the sea levels stay pretty much the same?

[hanzie113]

but the permafrost in the north also accounts for alot of water, that water would also cause the sea levels to change quite a bit, it would sink Shanghai for sure

[feedmytube]

is the the arctic circle likely to get 20C warmer any time soon? no

[rod1575]

This video must be a joke.