what it dosen't show is the plains tearing themselves apart as parts of them touch the ground causing the emergency landing to be a failure, that first one would have been 100% disaster
Of course. At least the undercarriage would have collapsed on the grass! Something else the folkes at MS overlooked. This needs a total rewrite of the damage profile file.
All the landings are much to fast you should land at at most 160 kias
Wells1955ATC 2 years ago
where did you get the plane at 2:07??
jersonvzor 2 years ago
if i were you i would delete fsx off my pc and throw the disks out. because you cant land for shit. Your a discrase to fs pilots everywhere...
jerseykid565 3 years ago
You are not supposed to bounce on the runway while landing... (if I'm not wrong)
persiforever 4 years ago
I agree the landings are very bad!!
agb610 4 years ago
Terrible landings!!
astrajaseuk 4 years ago
what it dosen't show is the plains tearing themselves apart as parts of them touch the ground causing the emergency landing to be a failure, that first one would have been 100% disaster
joevil2025 4 years ago
Of course. At least the undercarriage would have collapsed on the grass! Something else the folkes at MS overlooked. This needs a total rewrite of the damage profile file.
kitfox2000 4 years ago