Added: 4 years ago
From: TylerNull
Views: 1,547
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If supporting the troops is a bad thing, then I must be the worst of the worst.

  • proof liberals hate america they want the fuckin muslim pigs to take over. fuck em. fuck em all

  • fuck hippies and liberals

  • Sending cookies to the troops is not a political action or statement. Despite your belief concerning the conflicts, it is an undeniable fact that our troops are stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are homesick and want something from home. I hate ultra-blue state like MASS and CA.

  • Democrats think NAMBLA is a civil rights groups.

  • K but they don't support it.

  • No its not sod off

  • Then I guess I'm not politically correct! I will support our troops to the end!!! It has always been the soldiers who has given up everything and fought so we can stay here in AMERICA and live like there is no war! God Bless our Troops!!!!!

  • According to the left, the Boy Scouts are a bigger threat than Al Qaeda.

  • This is bullshit. Fuck that guy. I served over in Iraq. I'm a fucking Marine. When I get out this guy better pray I don't run into his stupid ignorant ass. Marines, soldiers, airmen and sailors risk their lives and give up so much so this idiot can sit comfy at home. I am from Massachusetts and I love the state very much but I am pretty ashamed of what happened there.

  • i dont need a goddamn care package, i need the land i defend to not go down the pipes and force tollerance of homosexuality in the schools of our children.

    fuck all you pedophiles and faggots. yeah i said it...i fight for my right to speak. and i fucking earned it.

    and when a soldier, marine, airman or sailor is deployed...none of that political shit matters. you think i give a flying fuck about any of this shit when me and my boys are out there getting shelled or rpg'd???

    fuck this bs

  • this is shameful, liberals suck!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • What's notable is that the US SUPREME COURT already decided on the matter -- agreeing with your point. Yet, the rabid left continue to shut down the Scouts whenever and wherever they can, and with the Democrat Party and Democrat officials supporting them.

    Liberals only pretend to favor democracy and the rule of law, only as long as it goes their way.

  • @acepilot156 Even if they simply didn't want gays in there, it should be their right as a private organization to choose who's part of it. That's just ridiculous. Anti discrimination laws means I'm not allowed to discriminate about whether to use barbed wire or toilet paper to wipe my ass?

  • The fact that the lawyer could get on there and repeat his rhetoric with a straight face is mind bogling in and of itself

  • what the fuck does this have to do with nambla? oh and by the way asshole (the person who posted this video) nambla has absolutely nothing to do with homosexuals, the members of nambla are pedophiles not homosexuals, theres a difference you ignorant piece of shit

  • "what the fuck does this have to do with nambla?" -- see the links in the video "more info" section (above, right).

    "nambla has absolutely nothing to do with homosexuals" -- NAMBLA is an organization of homosexual men who proudly demand America legalize child rape. They work with Democrat groups like ACLU who assist them in their goal. They call those opposing them "homophobic".

    Your hostility to reality doesn't make it go away.

  • So let me get this straight. Support the troops statment is illegal, while other protesters calling bush a liar, and advertisements for osama/obama 08 and hillary 08 at the said place would be ok. Sounds like a double standard to me.

  • BTW: the democraps know that if they attach bullshit amendments [cut armed forces in half, pull out of iraq] that no matter the outcome of the bill they win.

    I mean if the bills passed the troops would withdraw so they would not need to send them funding or supplies anyways. And if it was voted down/vetoed the democraps would still win since no funds went anyways.

    Democraps [not all] hate this country and should get the fuck out or shut the hell up and let the troops do their jobs!

  • +1 there mlao: fuck them is the ass with an iron stick until it breaks off.

    By my understanding is that both libs and conserveitives serve in the armed forces. Besides; anyone who doesnt support the troops needs an eye opening out the asshole of the media.

  • supporting the troops mean supports human beings in a time of need you ass holes, fuck cambridge

  • Simply unbelievable.

  • Well the law is the law... Why didn't they just move the donation box away from the polling booth? And "Tyler", what the hell does that story in the description box have to do with anything? NAMBLA has nothing to do with the Democratic Party, they're their own organization.

  • What law?

    Democrats try to hide their treasonous politics by reciting the claim that they "support the troops". If you're going to maintain that lie, then you can't claim that supporting the troops is political.

    Stop playing dumb, pick a lie, and stick with it.

  • The law I'm talking about is the law mentioned in the video. watch it again. Now, you say Democrats don't support the troops? Who voted against the body armor for the troops? The Republicans. Who says he'll veto the new GI bill so the troops have education? Bush, the Republican. Who forces extentions of tours down their throat? THE REPUBLICANS!!! You sir are the liar, not me...

  • You have yet to address the issue.

    You have yet to defend the absurdity that Boy Scouts showing support for the troops at a polling booth is illegal. There is no law, in or out of the video, against supporting the troops, in or out of a polling booth. Your newest bit of twaddle is as aggressively anti-logical as your original, as I just explained to you, for the second time.

    Who supports the enemy? Democrats. Say hi to Code Pink and Muthanna Al-Hanooti for me.

  • 1:05 in the video, look at it. The lawyer talks about Massachusettes law. As absurd as that law may sound, it is the law. And there is no law against supporting the troops. My question is if they knew the law, why did they go ahead with it? And good point by the way. I provide three clear examples that Democrats support the troops MORE than Republicans, and you just say "Who supports the enemy? Democrats." Real intellegent debate..

  • Oops, you did it again.

    According to the last Democrat fraud, "supporting the troops" is their (Demcorat's) APOLITICAL position; their magical shield against observations of their treasonous, "anti-war" (pro-enemy) politics.

    You can't have it both ways. Pick a lie and stick with it.

  • WHAT ARE THESE TREASONOUS POSITIONS??? You've mentioned them three times, but you've never come through with an example. Bill Clinton and Richard Clarke had a huge plan to get rid of Al Quida 9 months before 9/11, and he gave it to Bush, and Bush scrapped it. Before Iraq, a few far-sighted Democrats said it would distract us from Afganistan. Guess what? Osama is back up to his pre-9/11 numbers, and he's still at large. Don't tell me you're tough on terror until you can find a 7 foot man...

  • with Kidney failure that killed 3000 Americans.

  • Again you avoid the topic, only to spin more unrelated mythology.

    What treasonous positions? Saddam's spy, Muthanna Al-Hanooti, & his three Democrat congressmen, for starters, as I already posted. Further, Democrats have been fighting each and every aspect of the war. Democrats have betrayed our most successful interrogation program. (YT word limit).

  • Unrelated mythology? I don't think proven examples of Democrats supporting the troops and fighting terrorism are unrelated nor mythology. As for Hanooti, they had no idea that he was working for Saddam. That's why they're called SPIES, you aren't supposed to know who they're working for. And what interrogation program? Waterboarding, or as the rest of the world calls it, TORTURE!? There was an Al Quida offical who came out and said that his biggest recruiting tool was the fact that we tortured.

  • Your scattered list of irrelevancies is "proven examples" of your inability to address the topic. You're slippery, yet transparent.

    Again, the Democorat lie that supports their treasonous politics has always been that "everyone" supports the troops; that such is not political.

    Here, through their incessant attack against Boy Scouts, however, we witness their lie being exposed.

  • I don't really know how to put this, so let me try again. Examples of Democrats fighting terrorism are not irrelevant when we're talking about Democrats fighting terrorism. You need to stop attacking valid points by brushing them off. We have supported the troops more than the Republicans have. Bush is Vetoing a brand new GI bill. He doesn't want to give troops education. Bush vetoed the body armor bill. He doesn't want to give troops body armor. He also vetoed legislation to buy armored tanks.

  • Examples of Democrats betraying America are not offset by your irrelevant twaddle.

    Democrat leaders slander the US military soldiers, and most viciously whenever America is at war, e.g., Kerry, Murtha.

    Democrats betray classified programs (waterboarding).

    Democrat politicians are aligned with the enemy, e.g., CAIR, as in the example I gave, which is also tied to Democrats attacking the telephone companies for the "crime" of helping the FBI wiretap Al-Quida.

  • John Kerry never slandered the troops. And Murtha's statement, while regrettable, was no worse than what Rush Limbaugh said. And I already told you how you're on the wrong side of torture. Becuase it was used as an Al-Quida recruiting tool. Plus, CAIR is not a terrorist organization, as much as you'd like to think so, and we aren't attacking the telecom companies. We're attacking the fact that they be given full immunity. If they were only wiretapping al-Quida, let them defend it in court.

  • John Kerry's slander of US troops, and documented high treason, is recorded in the US Congressional Record. Then there's the 264 Swift Boat Vets to debunk his other lies. Your denial of Murtha's slanders is as shameless. Thank Limbaugh for outing phony soldiers like "Jesse MacBeth", another enemy propagandist beloved by Democrats.

    You attempted to absolve 3 Democrat congressmen by suggesting CAIR is a spy org', yet now attempt to defend Dem's other treason by suggesting they're not.

  • DON'T YOU DARE INVOKE THOSE SWIFT BOAT LYING BASTARDS! They lied about John Kerry's service to this country. So why do you hate the troops, Tyler? And so any solider who disagrees with you is a phony solider. Great. Finally, there was one spy in the CAIR organization. There have been spies in the CIA too, does that mean the CIA is anti-American?

  • * 264 Vietnam combat veterans vs. ONE treasonous Democrat politician, and yet you side with the politician to further slander the veterans.

    * No, PHONY soldiers are phony soldiers, e.g, "Jesse MacBeth".

    * One spy? How the hell would you know, and what are your Democrat leaders doing to find out? Of course, an investigation might jeopardize Dem/CAIR's attack on US telecom's for helping the FBI after 9/11.

    You really ARE a devout Democrat.

  • Liberals haven't an intellectually honest brain cell in their skull.

    Expose one bit of their propaganda, and they respond by proselytizing several new bits; always in defense of the depraved; always taking whatever side can maximally damage our nation in any given context.

  • He vetoed that bill because of the attachments the democratic party added to the bill. The bill would allow the the funding Bush needed, But he would have to totally withdraw the troops withing 6 months. And would require a major downsize of the military forces. And most of the things the democrates do are not patriotic. One example was a U.S. flag burning around here. They claimed freedom of speech. But if A republican would burn a flag it would be treason. They are Weasles one and all.

  • Well, NAMBLA is given protection by the same liberals in the ACLU that slander the Boy Scouts.

  • Insanse and stupid policy, as Cambridge has a history of being. Equally stupid the town leadership of Berkeley CA.

    But I recall you saying this:

    "... calls all democrats treasonous ..."

    -- keenly aware of Democrat treason, you invoked the mythical "all" qualifier in an attempt to dismiss the charge."

    You did just this in your video Tyler. Hard to escape your own set of lies isn't it?

  • Fuck america.

  • Behold scum of the Canadian mufsid type.

  • that guy is fucking stupid support the troops they deserve more then anyone

  • The reason why I could say that they would not be allowed to do so because a lot of people try to say that if you don't support the mission you do not support the troops. And now I guess you stand by the statement that the democratic party is the traitor party, OOO for good god.

  • No, we call Democrats traitors because they side with the enemy during war.

    They slander US Combat soldiers while in Congress (Murtha, Kerry). They reward those who assist the enemy in torturing US POWs (Fonda). They make movies depicting the US Military as rapists and murderers (Mark Cuban).

  • They have never done such a thing in congress, quit lieing. The other two people are private citizens so I really have no relation to them neither does anybody else unless they support them.

  • You deny well documented betrayals by two prominent Democrat politicians, and you go on to distance yourself from Democrats who are private citizens who've betrayed their nation.

    Aside from denying reality and distancing yourself from Democrat politics, is there anything else in your tactical arsenal?

  • Well I'm sure if Kerry and Murtha said such a thing it would be documented in a youtube video. Give me a video or something so that I may see it. And why wouldn't I distance myself from them if I don't share the same beliefs as them. I'm guessing you distance yourself from President Bush, or some other conservatives.

  • Your ignorance does not disprove the historical record. You obviously have access to a keyboard.

    Regarding distancing your self from your politics, you deny Democrat treachery, defend it and SIMULTANEOUSLY distance yourself with those who actively further it.

  • Watching that clip made me feel only despair. I am sure I will go to my grave wondering why Americans no longer cared about even the most vile assaults on their own heritage. Hating the Boy Scouts has become common among th left--no liberal parent would dream of putting their son in the Scouts--while the far-left Girl Scouts are filled with the daughters of liberals...

  • what the hell does this have to do with homosexual rape... and where is the rest of the video?

  • blind one,

    The Frenetic Crotch Sect of the Democrat party, headquartered in San Francisco, demanded that Boy Scouts submit to homosexual rapist troop leaders. The Boy Scouts refused, and the Democrats have been attacking and punishing them ever since.

    Here, the Democrats hatred is so intense that they forgot about their other lie -- that they're supposed to at least pretend they support US troops.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more