I know this may be a very early production model, but I thought the 455 equipped Centurions had the "455" numbers below the word Centurion on the side? I think the 455 was standard in '71 and '72, then became an option in '73.
@citrusparkguy Those are the beautiful Buick road wheels which the division began using with very slight alterations to the hub design each year since 1963.
@MNBluestater Same on the right side, too! '71 was the beginning of GM's poor quality. This generation of GM cars rusted where the "C" pillars joined the body, across the front of the hood and around the rear window. In '74, all GM models except for Cadillacs had side trim that was stuck on with glue and within about six months pieces would start falling off both sides, leaving ugly black marks where they had been.
although i love my lesabre t-type coupe,and super charged regal gs sedan, i would have loved to drive a big burly 455 powered brute like that. to see these cars perform that good back then makes me wish i could go back in time.
@redbuick I owned a base-trim level '73 LeSabre from '93 to about '98 that had the optional 455 and 2.75 axle instead of the 3.08 that came with the 350. It ran effortlessly but in the summer when I'd stop after being on the highway, the water would surge out of the overflow jug--it may have had a bad radiator cap I'm think after all these years.
In 1999 I had the opportunity to buy a 1973 225 Limited, 4 door, with all options. It needed a new top and hood, but everything else was great, even plastic still on the seats. I wanted that car (back when gas was .85 cents/gallon) but had no place to store it. Oh well...
Holy cow, my dad had one of these. I remember it was brown, and while the paint wasn't holding up the greatest, it definitely hauled ass. My old man loved the passing power and loved to show it off when I'd ask him "let's see what she can do".
hehe, the slalom in slo-mo. great vid, fantastic american car. love the centurion, more than say the pontiac GTO. The decals in itself are museum pieces LOL
We had a Centurion when I was growing up in the late 80's/early 90's, it was a beast, it handed Camaros and Mustangs their asses on numerous occasions, it's a shame some gook totalled it.
I had the Really big brother of this car, a 72 4 door lesaber. when I pulled the motor and trans out of the Lesaber, It still tipped the scales at 5700 lbs when I sent it to the crusher. I still have the 455 in a Nova and that motor (Even with the 8-1 compression) is still a stump puller. may have only had 250 HP but it turned a whopping 380 lbft of toqure.
I had the Really big brother of this car, a 72 4 door lesaber. when I pulled the motor and trans out of the Lesaber, It still tipped the scales at 5700 lbs when I sent it to the crusher. I still have the 455 in a Nova and that motor (Even with the 8-1 compression) is still a stump puller. may have only had 250 HP but it turned a whopping 480 lbft of toqure.
I find the performance of this Buick Centurion to be quite impressive considering that the car weighs over 4,000lbs and that emissions requirements reduced horsepower considerably. It's a vintage American car I would love to have.
Like a lot of people, I like comfortable ride. At the same time, though I also like being able to take a corner at moderate speeds without feeling like I'm going to slide off the pavement.
Brings back memories. These types of rides were my teenage rides. I had one of these, a 72 Electra 2 door, a 72 Impala 2 door, and a 74 Cutlass... Drifting these big boats was a blast and I didn't have a closed course LOL
Very well built and could go like a bat out of HELL considering the weight. Remember these types of cars well in the mid 80's as high school cruisers, usually hand me downs from dad or grandpa.
@MaximusRelaximus - That was par for the course back then. Most cars were rather softly sprung. @Monk543 - It's partly bias-ply tires and the rest is basic Newtonian physics - Large mass = big momentum. @snowman4839 - 4,500 lbs was average for this size car at the time. The four door version probably had a few extra pounds added on.
bought one of these when I was 16yrs old,,,back in 1982,,,for about $400,,,,yes,,,the good old days?? when a 16yr old started with a 455 engine in his first car
Even luxury cars need not be so soft in ride. To be able to stop is every bit as important as the ability to go. Why it took so damn long for Detroit to realise that is beyond me.
@iluvbuickgnx I like the brand new Buicks, the ones from 1992-2008 can go straight to the scrapyard as far as I'm concerned. The 455 wasn't prone to chronic intake manifold gasket failure followed by engine destruction like the motor in your '95. My 1985 Le Sabre is slower than this '72 and almost twice as slow as your '95, but the interior and body aren't falling apart like almost all cars from the late 1980's until recently. There's more to a car's quality than acceleration.
@85buickV8 my 1995 has no rust, the interior is in great shape, (could use vacuuming though) the 3800 series 1 doesn't leak anything, the tranny shifts great. not bad considering its got 284000 miles on the odometer. as for that gasket failure, if you avoid the orange dexcool antifreeze, you'll never have that problem. Its a great car if you can live with ugly.
@gitrdone1975 I'd like to see today's average teenage suburban yuppie kid do driver's ed in one of this things! they'd be lost in the sauce. I'm only 31, but I grew up on cars like this and learned to drive in cars that actually took some skill to drive.
@Seattlecarnut this was the same car as the LeSabre with a nicer interior. Was basically lined up like the Olds models - delta 88 and delta royale. Centurion competed against the Olds 88 Royale
Something is wrong with that difference between 50 and 60 mph. I do know the 455 was a huge torque monster because that engine warped the body on my Trans Am. I can also attest for the Buick brakes.
My first car was a 68 LeSabre and it could lock up the front brakes and make smoke. Thing stopped on a dime!
@CSXRockford Why would you want to flog the piss out of this car? If you spent 10 hours behind the wheel of this car, you would BURN the car your driving now. In this car, a passenger could actually sleep at 70 M.P.H. while rolling down the highway. Many people did just that while on long trips. It was not an unusual sight back in this car's day. On day long trips, people brought pillows and slept well. Cup holders? People put there drinks on the dashboards. They were safe there most of the time
@CSXRockford Do I have a problem reading? When did the term "flogging" suddenly take on the new meaning: to drive a car in a rough manner? If you are going to make up words, you can not possibly expect people to know what you are writing. Does that make sense to you? The word "flog" means: "1. To beat severely with a whip or rod." So, when I questioned why you would want to beat this car with a whip or a rod, I had good reason. I think the word you should've used, in your case, would be "drift".
There is something wrong with the numbers: 0-50 in 5.2 seconds, 0-60 in 9.4 seconds. It could not take 4.2 seconds to go from 50 to 60 which is sllloww. Same with the brakes: 93 feet to stop from 50 and 204 feet to stop from 60.
Body lean was NOT excessive?!!! WTH? Too funny....my parents had one of these and it was like driving a mattress. I loved that car though...hilarious!
@F150MikeFX4 The more the body leaned, the better the ride on the straight-a-ways. It's a shame that the new cars are designed as if everyone took corners at break-neck speeds.
@cadrolls1 Most people do take corners at break neck speeds. That's why today with all the modern innovations like ABS, traction control and stability control people still need to push their vehicle beyond its designed limits. Today in rainy, snowy and icy conditions, you still see as many people in the ditch smashed up or dead as you did in 1972.
@85buickV8 You could take corners fast with this Centurion too. The only difference is that you floated around them without the whiplash affect that the new cars give. The highway ride was supreme. Many families back then slept well while the Father drove them on vacation. Name one car where anyone can sleep anymore while going down the highway.
@85buickV8 Ain't that the truth! I have never owned a FWD or AWD car..always RWD And I have never had anti-lock brakes until my 2010 Mercury and I never get stuck in snow or spin out of control? Why? because I know how to drive. I love passing SUVs off the side of the road on snowy days because they think they are invincible. Or FWDs that spin the front wheels when accelerating because they don't have enough sense to downshift.
"Although we did find that the power steering unit would hesitate and cut out halfway thru the run".....Uhhh what?...Isn't this suppoed to be a NEW CAR!..LOL
@StoneCold75 : We used one of these for driver's ed in high school. That must have been why we kept running it over the curb on a winding road near our school. If the dealer who loaned it to us planning to resell it had known...
@StoneCold75 That was a common problem with all G.M. cars back then. It was like that on my "71" Fleetwood and my "76" Coupe DeVille too. G.M. had another problem with fuel starvation on hard right turns that lasted at least 'till "95" as it was the case on my "95" Brougham. I have read in recent auto magazines that it still effects certain G.M. models. Big Luxury cars of that era were never supposed to be driven the way they did for this test so they saw no reason to change anything at G.M.
(laughs) "Ole softy got some leg muscles." I like that. I'm not against luxury car ride and styling. But drivers also want to be able to avoid trouble without feeling as though you're going to flip over or slide into whatever it is you're trying to avoid.
@Seattlecarnut Believe it or not though, this car has a higher safety rating than either B.M.W. or Mercedes. B.M.W. consistantly is in the top ten cars for having more fatalities per mile driven than any other make of car. The autos with the lowest? They are all softly sprung cars. People tend to drive them differently.
@Doobie1975 I am not sure about the state that you live in but, here in Connecticut, I believe that they don't check after a certain age. I recently sold a "71" Fleetwood and a "76" DeVille and neither had to go through emissions. They did have to pass the regular safety inspection though.
@Doobie1975 They had enormous amounts of torque back then. These big Buicks were able to tow a 7,000 lb. trailer and when "properly equipped" could go as high as 9,000lbs. No car of today can tow even half of that. VERY few people towed with a pickup truck back then so the auto companies had to gear them accordingly.
I had a friend with one of these and a drunk in a 80's Suburban hit him head on. The Suburban crumpled like a tin can the Centurion had minor damage and drove away from the accident.
I also wish they can make cars as big and powerful like they used to back in the 1960s and early 1970s, I would love to own a 1971-72 Buick Centurion with a 455, I wish they didn't make the 350 standard for the 1973 Centurion
@Doobie1975 The Centurion ostensibly replaced the Wildcat that ended in 1970, but nothing could really replace that high compression 455 with 370 HP! The '71 and '72 Centurions were decent cars even with a low-comp 455, but by '73 with the 350 standard, it was just a glorified under-powered LeSabre--performance was dead by that time.
They called it Centurion for a good reason, it is built like a tank. What a shame we don't have nice big comfortable cars like this any more. Thanks for bringing back good memories.
USS Buick
Sail8410 13 hours ago
I know this may be a very early production model, but I thought the 455 equipped Centurions had the "455" numbers below the word Centurion on the side? I think the 455 was standard in '71 and '72, then became an option in '73.
VictrolaJazz 2 weeks ago
love those rims
citrusparkguy 1 month ago
@citrusparkguy Those are the beautiful Buick road wheels which the division began using with very slight alterations to the hub design each year since 1963.
VictrolaJazz 2 weeks ago
Haha 4:36 left driver's door paint doesn't match rest of car....typical GM !!! LOVE IT, HATE IT !
MNBluestater 2 months ago
@MNBluestater Same on the right side, too! '71 was the beginning of GM's poor quality. This generation of GM cars rusted where the "C" pillars joined the body, across the front of the hood and around the rear window. In '74, all GM models except for Cadillacs had side trim that was stuck on with glue and within about six months pieces would start falling off both sides, leaving ugly black marks where they had been.
VictrolaJazz 1 month ago
although i love my lesabre t-type coupe,and super charged regal gs sedan, i would have loved to drive a big burly 455 powered brute like that. to see these cars perform that good back then makes me wish i could go back in time.
redbuick 4 months ago
@redbuick I owned a base-trim level '73 LeSabre from '93 to about '98 that had the optional 455 and 2.75 axle instead of the 3.08 that came with the 350. It ran effortlessly but in the summer when I'd stop after being on the highway, the water would surge out of the overflow jug--it may have had a bad radiator cap I'm think after all these years.
VictrolaJazz 1 month ago
From a styling standpoint, it's... OK HAHA
edgarsterling 5 months ago
In 1999 I had the opportunity to buy a 1973 225 Limited, 4 door, with all options. It needed a new top and hood, but everything else was great, even plastic still on the seats. I wanted that car (back when gas was .85 cents/gallon) but had no place to store it. Oh well...
PotatoGunsRule 8 months ago
Holy cow, my dad had one of these. I remember it was brown, and while the paint wasn't holding up the greatest, it definitely hauled ass. My old man loved the passing power and loved to show it off when I'd ask him "let's see what she can do".
KA1040 8 months ago
hehe, the slalom in slo-mo. great vid, fantastic american car. love the centurion, more than say the pontiac GTO. The decals in itself are museum pieces LOL
TheMrBennito 8 months ago
pure gold!!!! what a tank!
durko83 10 months ago
We had a Centurion when I was growing up in the late 80's/early 90's, it was a beast, it handed Camaros and Mustangs their asses on numerous occasions, it's a shame some gook totalled it.
OldCarsAreBest 10 months ago
its a nice car
hamster700 11 months ago
Sorry about the double post, hit the button twice. Stupid double click habbit.
dkamcomie 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I had the Really big brother of this car, a 72 4 door lesaber. when I pulled the motor and trans out of the Lesaber, It still tipped the scales at 5700 lbs when I sent it to the crusher. I still have the 455 in a Nova and that motor (Even with the 8-1 compression) is still a stump puller. may have only had 250 HP but it turned a whopping 380 lbft of toqure.
dkamcomie 11 months ago
I had the Really big brother of this car, a 72 4 door lesaber. when I pulled the motor and trans out of the Lesaber, It still tipped the scales at 5700 lbs when I sent it to the crusher. I still have the 455 in a Nova and that motor (Even with the 8-1 compression) is still a stump puller. may have only had 250 HP but it turned a whopping 480 lbft of toqure.
dkamcomie 11 months ago
I find the performance of this Buick Centurion to be quite impressive considering that the car weighs over 4,000lbs and that emissions requirements reduced horsepower considerably. It's a vintage American car I would love to have.
Seattlecarnut 11 months ago
Like a lot of people, I like comfortable ride. At the same time, though I also like being able to take a corner at moderate speeds without feeling like I'm going to slide off the pavement.
Seattlecarnut 11 months ago
Brings back memories. These types of rides were my teenage rides. I had one of these, a 72 Electra 2 door, a 72 Impala 2 door, and a 74 Cutlass... Drifting these big boats was a blast and I didn't have a closed course LOL
Joe6packAmerican 1 year ago
at 4:29 not too many test drivers can drift a big body car like this guy did excellent driving
isaiah213 1 year ago
Very well built and could go like a bat out of HELL considering the weight. Remember these types of cars well in the mid 80's as high school cruisers, usually hand me downs from dad or grandpa.
rever65 1 year ago
@MaximusRelaximus - That was par for the course back then. Most cars were rather softly sprung. @Monk543 - It's partly bias-ply tires and the rest is basic Newtonian physics - Large mass = big momentum. @snowman4839 - 4,500 lbs was average for this size car at the time. The four door version probably had a few extra pounds added on.
16924fps 1 year ago
"body lean was not excessive" LOL really? Wow, obviously "excessive" had a whole different benchmark 38 years ago, but still...REALLY???
MaximusRelaximus 1 year ago
The Buick 60-0 braking distance: 204 ft.
A 2002 Ford Focus: 118sf. Yow.
Monk543 1 year ago
It would have done even better in the slalom if it had radial tires.
That's got a ton of body roll, but didn't they all.
tommylord 1 year ago
SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4500lbs??!?!?!?
snowman4839 1 year ago
When cars were cars and not generic-looking plastic bubbles on wheels.
bannol 1 year ago
bought one of these when I was 16yrs old,,,back in 1982,,,for about $400,,,,yes,,,the good old days?? when a 16yr old started with a 455 engine in his first car
9lateralus 1 year ago
Beautiful, exciting and elegant from every angle.
FURY1958 1 year ago
i want one so bad
isaiah213 1 year ago
Even luxury cars need not be so soft in ride. To be able to stop is every bit as important as the ability to go. Why it took so damn long for Detroit to realise that is beyond me.
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
9.4 seconds...wow. My 95 LeSabre with a 231 V6 could beat a Wildcat with a 455 big block in it.
and you haters say cars haven't been improved since then.
iluvbuickgnx 1 year ago
@iluvbuickgnx I like the brand new Buicks, the ones from 1992-2008 can go straight to the scrapyard as far as I'm concerned. The 455 wasn't prone to chronic intake manifold gasket failure followed by engine destruction like the motor in your '95. My 1985 Le Sabre is slower than this '72 and almost twice as slow as your '95, but the interior and body aren't falling apart like almost all cars from the late 1980's until recently. There's more to a car's quality than acceleration.
85buickV8 1 year ago
@85buickV8 my 1995 has no rust, the interior is in great shape, (could use vacuuming though) the 3800 series 1 doesn't leak anything, the tranny shifts great. not bad considering its got 284000 miles on the odometer. as for that gasket failure, if you avoid the orange dexcool antifreeze, you'll never have that problem. Its a great car if you can live with ugly.
iluvbuickgnx 1 year ago
@iluvbuickgnx I'd still rather have a 455 though.
iluvbuickgnx 1 year ago
@iluvbuickgnx That's true, but your 231 V6 couldn't pull a 7,500 lb. trailer, either.
VictrolaJazz 1 month ago
What's wrong with a floating ride? I happen to dislike feeling bumps.
iluvbuickgnx 1 year ago
dang with todays cars...! i don't believe to many people that could handle such a big car no car leans like that anymore,great car,
gitrdone1975 1 year ago
@gitrdone1975 I'd like to see today's average teenage suburban yuppie kid do driver's ed in one of this things! they'd be lost in the sauce. I'm only 31, but I grew up on cars like this and learned to drive in cars that actually took some skill to drive.
85buickV8 1 year ago
If only all American cars of the period performed as well as this. I thought the Electra and the LeSabre were better looking than the Centurion.
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
@Seattlecarnut this was the same car as the LeSabre with a nicer interior. Was basically lined up like the Olds models - delta 88 and delta royale. Centurion competed against the Olds 88 Royale
biglinc1 1 year ago
@biglinc1 Nice!
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
@Seattlecarnut yeah... i love old rides, wish i had the money to buy up everyone i saw on ebay... :)
biglinc1 1 year ago
@biglinc1 So do I. My favourites have always been the Buicks and Oldsmobiles of the 1960s up to 1971.
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
I loved this video clip!!!!
DiGreco 1 year ago
@DiGreco Isn't it great?
cadrolls1 1 year ago
Love the anti lock brake j/k LMAO
Tcamp95818 1 year ago
I own a 72 Lesabre Conv..
THESE ARE AWSOME CARS!!!!!!!!!!
maddog24637 1 year ago
@maddog24637 I own a 72 LeSabre 4dr Hardtop custom!
DiGreco 1 year ago
that big mf runs and handles like a 80's Z-28!! Hahaha! I remember these when i was in grammar school.
BNforever2009 1 year ago
NASA doesn't even build anything this powerful.
JET997u 1 year ago
Something is wrong with that difference between 50 and 60 mph. I do know the 455 was a huge torque monster because that engine warped the body on my Trans Am. I can also attest for the Buick brakes.
My first car was a 68 LeSabre and it could lock up the front brakes and make smoke. Thing stopped on a dime!
ClefDeDavid88 1 year ago
I sure would love to know what orchestra is performing the background music for these tests!!!!!!!!!
landyachtfan79 1 year ago
@landyachtfan79
Yea that cracks me up, That music while they flog the piss outta this car..lol
CSXRockford 1 year ago
@CSXRockford Why would you want to flog the piss out of this car? If you spent 10 hours behind the wheel of this car, you would BURN the car your driving now. In this car, a passenger could actually sleep at 70 M.P.H. while rolling down the highway. Many people did just that while on long trips. It was not an unusual sight back in this car's day. On day long trips, people brought pillows and slept well. Cup holders? People put there drinks on the dashboards. They were safe there most of the time
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@cadrolls1
Do you have a problem reading? I said They where flogging it as in DRIVING the wheels off of it, and I would drive it the same way. SIDEWAYS.
CSXRockford 1 year ago
@CSXRockford Do I have a problem reading? When did the term "flogging" suddenly take on the new meaning: to drive a car in a rough manner? If you are going to make up words, you can not possibly expect people to know what you are writing. Does that make sense to you? The word "flog" means: "1. To beat severely with a whip or rod." So, when I questioned why you would want to beat this car with a whip or a rod, I had good reason. I think the word you should've used, in your case, would be "drift".
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@landyachtfan79
Wonder if they seen the testing going on while they played..lol
CSXRockford 1 year ago
does anyone have any idea what group is playing the soundtrack at 1:05 to 1:55?
piper4seeformerly 1 year ago
There is something wrong with the numbers: 0-50 in 5.2 seconds, 0-60 in 9.4 seconds. It could not take 4.2 seconds to go from 50 to 60 which is sllloww. Same with the brakes: 93 feet to stop from 50 and 204 feet to stop from 60.
dynaflow1960 1 year ago
Body lean was NOT excessive?!!! WTH? Too funny....my parents had one of these and it was like driving a mattress. I loved that car though...hilarious!
F150MikeFX4 1 year ago
@F150MikeFX4 the handeling probably got far worse because the suspension is well worn out by now lol
that70sshow89 1 year ago
@F150MikeFX4 The more the body leaned, the better the ride on the straight-a-ways. It's a shame that the new cars are designed as if everyone took corners at break-neck speeds.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@cadrolls1 Most people do take corners at break neck speeds. That's why today with all the modern innovations like ABS, traction control and stability control people still need to push their vehicle beyond its designed limits. Today in rainy, snowy and icy conditions, you still see as many people in the ditch smashed up or dead as you did in 1972.
85buickV8 1 year ago
@85buickV8 You could take corners fast with this Centurion too. The only difference is that you floated around them without the whiplash affect that the new cars give. The highway ride was supreme. Many families back then slept well while the Father drove them on vacation. Name one car where anyone can sleep anymore while going down the highway.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@85buickV8 Ain't that the truth! I have never owned a FWD or AWD car..always RWD And I have never had anti-lock brakes until my 2010 Mercury and I never get stuck in snow or spin out of control? Why? because I know how to drive. I love passing SUVs off the side of the road on snowy days because they think they are invincible. Or FWDs that spin the front wheels when accelerating because they don't have enough sense to downshift.
IstvanN1961 1 year ago
Not to mention the number of people that do not know that an automatic transmission can be shifted!
IstvanN1961 1 year ago
Great car ! Better that the cars today , it has more styling.
marilyn69monroe 1 year ago
"Although we did find that the power steering unit would hesitate and cut out halfway thru the run".....Uhhh what?...Isn't this suppoed to be a NEW CAR!..LOL
StoneCold75 1 year ago
@StoneCold75 : We used one of these for driver's ed in high school. That must have been why we kept running it over the curb on a winding road near our school. If the dealer who loaned it to us planning to resell it had known...
swmdal 1 year ago
@StoneCold75 That was a common problem with all G.M. cars back then. It was like that on my "71" Fleetwood and my "76" Coupe DeVille too. G.M. had another problem with fuel starvation on hard right turns that lasted at least 'till "95" as it was the case on my "95" Brougham. I have read in recent auto magazines that it still effects certain G.M. models. Big Luxury cars of that era were never supposed to be driven the way they did for this test so they saw no reason to change anything at G.M.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
LOL 204 feet to stop from 60. cars now do it in half that distance.
pdennis93 1 year ago
"If youre a bettle driver..you'll be thankful to stretch your legs" lol classic
MajorKoenig2 1 year ago
(laughs) "Ole softy got some leg muscles." I like that. I'm not against luxury car ride and styling. But drivers also want to be able to avoid trouble without feeling as though you're going to flip over or slide into whatever it is you're trying to avoid.
Seattlecarnut 2 years ago
@Seattlecarnut Believe it or not though, this car has a higher safety rating than either B.M.W. or Mercedes. B.M.W. consistantly is in the top ten cars for having more fatalities per mile driven than any other make of car. The autos with the lowest? They are all softly sprung cars. People tend to drive them differently.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@cadrolls1 Really? I didn't know that. But then I've never driven either a Mercedes-Benz or a B.M.W.
Seattlecarnut 1 year ago
I love the comment from this cornball,the styling is OK! Other then a skylark its the best looking Buick or full size GM car of the 70s
centurion1479 2 years ago
i like a 75 lesabre just as much!
goony2345 1 year ago
Awesome car!I LOVE MY 72!
centurion1479 2 years ago
How much power did the 455 have from the Centurion? Some sources say it has only 225 net hp and others say it has 250 net hp
Doobie1975 2 years ago
The 455 has almost 400 horses after the emissions control equipment is stripped. A 455 can be tuned similar to a stage 1 455.
shibbyman8787 2 years ago
I've never known that removing the emissions control equipment would increase alot more power
Doobie1975 2 years ago
@Doobie1975 Yes, it would but, it would not pass emissions.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@cadrolls1 Would it be able to pass emissions today if they would stripp off the emission controls equipment?
Doobie1975 1 year ago
@Doobie1975 I am not sure about the state that you live in but, here in Connecticut, I believe that they don't check after a certain age. I recently sold a "71" Fleetwood and a "76" DeVille and neither had to go through emissions. They did have to pass the regular safety inspection though.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
@cadrolls1 I'm from Washington State (Pacific Northwest)
Doobie1975 1 year ago
@Doobie1975 They had enormous amounts of torque back then. These big Buicks were able to tow a 7,000 lb. trailer and when "properly equipped" could go as high as 9,000lbs. No car of today can tow even half of that. VERY few people towed with a pickup truck back then so the auto companies had to gear them accordingly.
cadrolls1 1 year ago
i have a 72 lesabre. looks the exact same. small block is the only difference i see. i love my clean ass buick!
laidback72 2 years ago
@laidback72 I actually like '72s better because they don't have those idiotic vent holes in the trunk lid.
VictrolaJazz 1 month ago
I had a friend with one of these and a drunk in a 80's Suburban hit him head on. The Suburban crumpled like a tin can the Centurion had minor damage and drove away from the accident.
Silvertrine 2 years ago
I also wish they can make cars as big and powerful like they used to back in the 1960s and early 1970s, I would love to own a 1971-72 Buick Centurion with a 455, I wish they didn't make the 350 standard for the 1973 Centurion
Doobie1975 2 years ago
@Doobie1975 The Centurion ostensibly replaced the Wildcat that ended in 1970, but nothing could really replace that high compression 455 with 370 HP! The '71 and '72 Centurions were decent cars even with a low-comp 455, but by '73 with the 350 standard, it was just a glorified under-powered LeSabre--performance was dead by that time.
VictrolaJazz 1 month ago
motated by a 455
harley1450000 2 years ago
ah, yes, the 4-barrel Rochester carb
spotbelly 2 years ago
My father bought one new in '72 and it had the Stage 1 option which was available in the Rivera also.
Bag0fRats 2 years ago
They called it Centurion for a good reason, it is built like a tank. What a shame we don't have nice big comfortable cars like this any more. Thanks for bringing back good memories.
storrs19 2 years ago
ah good stuff, the very first car of mommas i drove. what a treasure,.but i was looking for the trade mark buick port holes i dont see them.
mastertung7 2 years ago
The Centurion did not have portholes, all the other Buicks did however.
EagleEyedRanger 2 years ago