Moon Rising: "False Horizons"

[viewer821]

I have 3 questions:

1. 11 cameras were allegedly left on the moon. How was it possible to remove the film from the cameras with such glovers like the astronauts wore?

2.I recently that a modern (!) film fritz out at a temperature of -58°C . How can this old film survive temperature differences between -120°C and +120°C?

3. How can the film survive the strong radiation of the Van-Allen-Belt?

[andrefilms]

But why? What is there to hide?

[StargodArbiter]

So, let me get this straight...

You expect to see white crosshairs on a white background, and black ones on an equally black background?

...are you serious? Did you even think this one through?

[rodgymac]

@StargodArbiter

Yup, we like to call this "The eSCAMilla Get-Out Clause". eSCAMilla likes to (inadvertently) use at least 2 logical fallicies per paragraph.

[nightlightabcd]

Any amateur star gazer with enough money for the equipment, any telescope that can be adapted with atachments for a camera, and a camera can supply you with all the pictures you want. A good telescope can put you right into any crater. However, this is on the lighted side and thses craters are much larger than you might think so the resalution is not enough to detect the remnants of manned landings. There are many pictures of the surface of the moon and the universe if you look for them.

[doctorsizzle]

someone made a very interesting point about using telescopes. yes...don't you find it strange that if we had telescopes that can easily let us see the surface of the moon...then why the hell don't we have a shitload of pictures for the public to view. you've got millions of pictures of mount rushmore, grand canyon and other earthly wonders...why not photos of the surface of the moon...i mean the bitch is right there! look up and you see the moon. easy photos to get right? WRONG? AND WHY?

[doctorsizzle]

i mean without being a skeptic or believer...some of the analysis comes down to common sense. if we have telescopes that can catch the vivid colors of a nebula...farther than the moon or an anonymous photo of space with thousands of starts...where the hell did the colors and stars go in the picture of moon and earth...where all you see is BLACK!? i mean what happened to the stars behind the earth? not there? just earth, moon, and blank space?

[clnmyjts]

IF...there was a real moon landing it wasn`t done with the space shuttles we think it was done with.

IF Nasa really did go to the moon and really did take all the photos presented by Nasa from & on the moon. Logics say`s it was done by a different form of space travel.

How black are black projects? How old are black space travel project?

IF we had advanced black space probes & crafts ( in 1960 ) then I would say the photo from the moon are real. IF not? Then it all a lie. EVERYTHING.

[clnmyjts]

Just because it stamped a Nasa photo don`t give creed to it`s truth..Remember in the video moon Rising? He said the old guy that worked at nasa said they where lying about EVERYTHING.

This is a key point to make..What It really is saying to me is ( There is no truth YET..)

In this cause a picture is not as good as a thousand words..when you could have a million fake pictures. Faked by Nasa.

Like I said before ( take the toys away from Nasa and give them to someone honest..)

[DudeHolyCrap69]

so....what DOES it look like from space?

[un4g1v3n1]

watch?v=lMuTiziCszU

So, any idiot that watches amon's bullshit vidoe will see that NASA altered the phots of Buzz Aldrin on the moon to attempt to eliminate the light fall-off, and minimilize the HOT SPOT of light around him that proves the photo was taken with a spot light. Amon is like 777, and Jose Escamilla! All three either intention shills, or completely ignorant fucking dupes!

Enjoy the small prison your mind is being made into by the ignorant and intentionally deceptive!

[un4g1v3n1]

The problems with the photos here Jose is that the moon, being evenly lit by the sun, should provide detail for landscape reaching out for miles, and miles, and miles. Instead we only see for as far as the MOONSET stretched, until it hit the BLACK BACKDROP.

Do you understand they were not on the moon at all?

Or do you need to believe in Apollo Fairy Tales to help sell this propaganda piece for NASA?

[777equals666]

Becareful everybody when reading info present by un4g1v3n1. Other YT users have evidence to suggest that he fraudulently changes the original Apollo photos he presents in his online films to perpetuate a fake Apollo Moon Landing theory:

watch?v=dejJmkYrynE

[un4g1v3n1]

Escamilla is either an ignorant dupe, or purposeful CIA disinformation spewing shill. Either way, he must be completely ignorant of the immense amounts of radiation in space, otherwise he would already understand that Apollo was a complete fraud!!!

watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg

Wake up Jose. You are missing the real story of the Apollo hoax, and helping NASA to deceive humanity. Your efforts to this effect is the act of a TRAITOR!

[mssnor]

I can't believe they masked out everything...

[un4g1v3n1]

They didn't. They were on a moon set. What the hell is wrong with people?

watch?v=rNEurUZ15zw

[mssnor]

Yeah... who knows if they even went there?

NASA = worst liars ever.

[un4g1v3n1]

Space physicists who can go to the NGDC and see the recorded MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during Apollo missions can say they never went. Or they can repeat the Apollo propaganda supporting mantra, and say they were LUCKY!

The problem with Jose's film, is he doesn't take into account that the forgery going on here was to fake the lunar missions. Instead he tries to support Apollo using the UFO hype.

And some very uneducated UFO people are buying it. Thankfully not many!!!

[disheveleddreams]

lol i dont think some of them were meant to hide stuff.. probably some were just erased to produce a more iconic shot

[Serubis]

Shows you the how low the government will go to keep people of earth Dumped down and stupid so they work like slaves and pay tax

[jbox418prs]

EXACTLY!  Thanks for being one of the few with a brain.

[Synarious]

image compression is party based on redundancy reduction 100% black means almost zero information

dpi has nothing to do with compression

photography means capturing of light, if there is no light, there is no exposure on the sensor medium, and no crosshairs either

the black areas may also be the result of a workflow process developing the film and preparing the image for screens, which inevitably means throwing away exposure information and narrowing highlight and shadow clipping points

[zeepster]

Jose thank you for doing these films.

[Synarious]

why would you be able to see black crosshairs on 100% black background

try painting a black crosshair on your window and taking a picture of it against the night sky

masking out the sky around planets on astro-pictures to pure black helps decreasing the filesize of a compressed image like that up to 75%

the bitmap information in that area is probably not interesting with brightness levels between 0 and 10% showing no visible stars at all

why is this guy giving so much false information?

[dumbnetworks]

@Synarious, you are right!!! I think people should recognize the facts and stop acting like sheeps, stop buying this guys movie. It is clear that he is doing it for fame and money, with zero facts! and FALSE INFORMATION!!

[jbox418prs]

LOL You know nothing. Living your life pretending that your government wouldn't lie to you is acting like a sheep. WAKE UP!

[dumbnetworks]

this is false information!!! you are right!!!

[123backinyerface]

You assuming of course that the horizon is 100% black.

[kiuhy7]

interesting stuff

[thewhiteopsdude]

Awesome job Jose!

:-)

5 stars

[thewhiteopsdude]

Is difficult for many ppl to accept such disturbing facts as Jose point out in his movie.

[GuillaumeTremblay30]

Amen!

[b6gm6n]

Please accept my apologies for my rudeness, reading back i didn't come across too well, I'm sorry for that... lets move on.

Structures on the moon? you gotta be fucking kidding me...

Firstly, i have a few experiments in video concerning the myth of UFOs - it's another channel of mine (7oxicm4n) its for a UFO myth film I'm creating, not a biggy, not for sale, a few minutes of truth in the right direction cannot hurt anyone right?

I have my point of you, you have yours, lets chat later...

[joseescamilla]

Apology accepted. In the end result, we're all in the same boat. I never pretend to know it all because I don't. All I can do is show what has been put on us that keeps us in check. It's a fact that when people finally "see what's up" that their choices will come to a head. Once you know the truth - what are you going to do about it? Some will run and hide, some will sink into their safety zone and not get involved. I didn't like what I found out and made a film about it. That's all!

[777equals666]

Do us all a favor b6gm6n,

When you chat next time with Jose, take into considering that Jose and Millions of others (based on past view numbers alone) all over the planet believe that Man-kind is truly not the TOP of the Food Chain when in retrospect to the entire UNIVERSE. Have you seen the Hubble Telescope pictures that have come out, ever? You would have to think very Arrogant and Egotistical of yourself to believe that all UFO accounts are fake...

[RapaTerntSanga]

aliens are very shy lol..

[un4g1v3n1]

Do b6gm6n and myself a favor. Learn about the space environment in and beyond the Magnetosphere. And then try and convince us again how we are suppose to believe that a bunch of guys were able to survive it all and still run around on Earth 40 years later without their nerves deteriorating. Or EVEN at ALL! Ignorance of space physics, and taking a serious look at raw Apollo footage is what you are guilty of 777. However, if Jose is as smart as he wants us to think he is, he is guilty of more!

[777equals666]

If you are referring to the Van Allen Belt, I dont see how that would apply to what is being presented on Moon Rising. BTW, I look at all footage that NASA stamps their name on...

If you have seen the whole film Moon Rising you would know that it is the real deal, the facts are presented "AS-IS" and your banter for attention has value only to you at the end of the day.

PEACE...

[un4g1v3n1]

I watched Moon Rising...And in it, Jose makes the comment that there can be no doubt that NASA put men on the moon.

I have serious doubts, to the point of knowing there is no way that is possible, even to this VERY DAY!

Peace back at ya!

[777equals666]

You are certainly welcomed to your opinion, I just don't appreciate people who question my intelligence because of their personal doubts on the subject. To each his own...

[un4g1v3n1]

If you keep believing this tripe, more than just your intelligence will be in question!

Get used to it!

[123backinyerface]

Yes, apology accepted, its not your fault really, its just how you have been taught to interpret information from an authority you trust.

No one can hold that against you. Now all you need to work on is your ego, and then you will be well on your way to accepting certain truths.

This information didn't come from from a 16 year old youtuber trying to mess with people, this info is from seriously committed people and many renown scientists, in search of real answers.

[123backinyerface]

Great video btw, 5*

[b6gm6n]

Real answers to what? this is a sci-fi movie for the US ufology dvd market, whatever large group your into, you can sell them stuff... new agers are especially easy to sell BS to... doesn't matter if it's real or based of evidence...its the 'could be's, the maybees' the what ifs... well thats fine, but you gotta dig deep... i don't take BS from authority, i can see through it all usually, there's a secret about 'ufos' so called which you should really try to understand first...

[b6gm6n]

i say 'secret' god...it's bleedin obvious... there's no such thing as ufo's, as we know them, it's all a myth, we the people have made up the rest of the bullshit, layers upon layers of it...for the last 60 years...covering the 'real' truth and at the bottom, the real cover story, the truth/answers your all looking for, but it aint pretty or good and you don't wanna look because the fantasy sells you...the cover story remains buried because of our stupid incredulousness... the truth is out there

[123backinyerface]

Well I guess its a case of those who don't want to see....won't.

10 years ago I would have said what you are saying, but then I actually did my own research and well, here I am.

To each his own, if you didn't want to believe then why would you even post, why not just choose a different video to watch?

Seems a pointless exercise to me.

You don't take BS from authority so why should everyone on this comment section take it from you either?

[southparkresident]

thank you. I've done my research as well.

[b6gm6n]

haha.. just saw your post after posting mine... your right mate, it's a fucking shame, people are so easily hood-winked.. :)

[b6gm6n]

Man didn't go to the moon, so called "ufo" 'investigators' failed to find the truth and so i think yank the public incredulity (for cash) and they know it...the obvious moon-shot fake at 0:25... i should watch some more before commenting :) - ok, had to stop... i see where this is going... good 1 on the cross-hair/false horizons, could be engineered, have you checked the pictures yourself? anyways if this dude says...they faked it because of UFOs/structures... then shoot him, liar c*nt

[b6gm6n]

god...you people are so gullible, cant you all see whats happening here? offer you a truth-nugget (moon photo fakes) then bash you over the head with a myth (UFOS) oh god... wake the fuck up please, these people are SELLING you BS, because you guys suck it all up... jesus, if you want to know the truth about UFOs just ask me... then do your own research, i did, 35 years worth, I'm throwing down the gauntlet...CHALLENGE ME!

[eeasynow]

thanks Jose !

can't wait to see your movie, it looks awesome so far... NASA got some explaining to do....lol

[greenmagoos]

Seconded.

Great stuff Jose.

[Alexlind88]

Great stuff Jose!