Why Silverstein, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Pearl and Guilliani still not are convicted for mass murder is the sign of the total corruption of the complete US society. ponerology,com
when a bigoted, retarded jerkoff truthtard like you calls me a dickhead, that's like getting a wonderful compliment from an intelligent and thoughtful friend.
WTC-7 is what make me change my mind, It is impossible for 48 story building to fall like that , reason FIRE.
29 Story building in Belgrade was hit by multiple missiles during USA government criminal actions in Serbia 1999 and was burning all night did not collapse it was just cleaned and rebuild in 2005. And other big buildings walls collapse but whole building to fall like that as WTC-7 simply not possible with FIRE.
@redsox9890 'PULL IT' IN WEBSTERS DICTIONARY: demolition: tear down, knock down, pull down why are americans so brainwashed?? it's crazy to think the govt would attack itself to justify war? yet history proves it over and over! ever heard of the gulf of tonkin? USS Lusitania? USS Liberty? FDR allowing the attack on PH? watch?v=r4Y0A7-1ykA Cheney allowing the attack on 911? /watch?v=THlZ-Rd-lig NIST ADMITS FREE FALL of WTC7 = EXPLOSIVES ONLY POSSIBILITY! 911 = INSIDE JOB!
@American2Revolution but not one demolition company uses the term pull it to demolish a building. Also do you think that larry slverstein would be stupid enough to announce to the whole world that it was demolished. he was reffering to pulling the firefighters out of the area because there was a giant whole at the bottom of wtc7. and the building had almost no support.
@American2Revolution you have some serious problems. i cannot believe that you could honestly think that pearl harbor, the lusitania, and 9/11 were all done by the government. you think that we're brainwashed? you sound crazy if you honestly believe that these tradgic events were all done to justify war. and again why would larry seilveratein broadcast to the entire world that it was qn inside job. dont you think that would hqve been on some type of news chqnnel?
@American2Revolution also the reason it was the first time that a steel framed building had collapsed was becaus it was the first time a building hqd been hit by a 10 ton jet voing the speed of a bullet with 10,000 gallons of fuel. and the reason wtc7 fell was because ther was a giant hole covefing 25 percent of th base if u hqdnt noticed that.
"pull it" in demo terms means to literally attach steel cables to a building and pull it down with heavy machinery (like bulldozers, tractors, etc)
is that what you think happened? as long as you want to interpret larry silverstein's words literally, can you provide any evidence that wtc7 was pulled down with cables and bulldozers?
or is this, yet again, another truther rant that was not thought through one bit?
This doesn't make sense the reason the mayor newt would collapse was because it was burning for a long time anne there had been a giant explosion after a 20 ton jet hit it and when Larry said to pull out he was ordering the fire fighters to pull out.
he did that while mentioning what was said TO him from someone else.
is this really so complicated? are you this stupid or mentally ill?
if someone related a story to you about another person murdering someone, do you get confused and think the person telling the story committed the murder?
use your common sense and not decide to act stupid metal dont disintegrate into dust have you people gone insane, there should have been piles of rubble many stories high and you fools say all three tower go on strike on 9/11 and its components decide not to follow the rules of nature. All your doing your looking like idiots infront of the ones who done it and they are laughing saying didn't I tell you they would believe anything
when the twin -tower complex was built they used CANDLE-WAX instead of steel - ehem ! .... aparently ...either that or the so called terrorists are way in advance of anything we are caperble of - should not there be a full inquiry on what happened so that we can find out so this shit cannot happen again ...
these where the only 3 towers in history that supposedly came down due to fire. The people who believe this are the most stupid peice of scums on earth, and on the day of judgement they will be a part of this for supporting such crap. Tell you the truth they are no different to the people who planned it they are a part of this, you will hardly find a single person who lost their family supporting this its only the fools the monkeys and donkeys whos got nothing to loose assholes
there is so many stupid people on this planet if i was to tell them it was my fart that made it go down they would belive it. silverstein told people he spoke to a person telling them to pull it but when he was in a press conference he was asked who he spoke to cause no one had knowledge of speaking to him he refused to answer. every morning he has breakfast in the towers but that day he decided not to go he even called his daughter to get out of the second tower before it took place
@guidedfox Odd how the guy debunking this stuff comes off much more intelligent than you or any of the other college potheads running around telling the "sheeple" to "wake up" to some shitty documentary they watched likely made by some other college pothead.
@FuckingStanz Odd how you dont even have a clue of what you<re talking about and still talk shit, the sheeple NEEDS to wake up, but you probably wont, just go watch tv or something.
@DREwestcoast Yet another cliche psuedo-enlightened pretentious fluff comment from another conspiracy theorist. I don't watch TV. I watch a healthy dose of documentaries, and this conspiracy is almost as lolable as "Project Blue Beam".
@copenhagenlct And your comment of free fall. Yes, the building slowed down from lower collisions, but then it is not free fall. The reason they use freefall as proof of explosion is that the explosions would reduce building into small enough particles to not cause resistance. Even though they'd be wrong cause demolition teams don't place enough explosives to disintegrate all of it.
Watch the fucking videos yourself, don't really on what others say. It did not happen in 9s.
@copenhagenlct First the steel didn't need to be melted to break the structure. Steel loses half of it's strength @~600C , and all strength (the pt we can bend) @1200C. Next jet fuel wasn't the only source of heat. Also,The kinetic energy from impact would increase temperatures (I calc. it to =100tons of dynamite), plus all the shit in the building would burn, plus the large winds would intensify the fire. I
DUMBASSES: This demolition idea is bullcrap. First, there is no real or non-falsifiable evidence for any of your claims. Plus terrorist continued to attack by suicide bombs in the US and other countries.
Now, I hate to help you idiots out, but with all evidence against your claim it would have been easier for you all to claim it was real, but the terrorists were payed offed or encouraged by our gov't. But, even that is false. If a guy is willing to put a bomb on his balls.. he's serious
Pull it - meant to have the firefighter stop trying to put out the fire. It is a coincidence they use pull it demolition stop making false connections, because are too stupid to understand rational thought. This person is so stupid to misrepresent what people are saying.
@drax325 pull it-means drop the building! Take them out/ pull them out/give it up/release them ect means-"have the firefighters stop trying to put out the fire."
@copenhagenlct No it does not mean drop the building in this context. Plus "pull it" is almost an archaic phrase used in demolition. You'll never hear anyone today or just befor 9/11 use that.
Firefighters are not allowed to give up on a fire until given permission. That is why they ask the owner of the building. Who responded with the phrase. Pull it. Means pull "the mission"/ the objective/ or whatever the firefighters call their task. Stop trying to see things that aren't there.
@drax325 Whatever it means the buildings were brought down in a controled demolition. They feel at FREEFALL speed. The buildings were designed to withhold a plane attack because of there height. But yet the buildings fell in a matter of seconds. there has never been a steel structer building that has collasped due to fire the only ones are the trade towers and building 7!
@copenhagenlct The buildings went down after internal fires. So, technically it withstood a plane crash because it did not crash immediately after hit. And it did not fall at free fall speed. I estimate it took the first tower 14(+/- 2)sec. to collapse. And I did the basis calculus: at full height of 1368ft @ free fall speed it would take 9.22sec. The correct free fall speed would from the break height which would be even sooner sqrt(heght of break/1368ft)*9.22sec would give better FF I refer
@drax325 steel melts at 2700 jet fuel fire temp = 1500 there for steel can not melt! Plus majoity of the fuel burnt on impact! the other 70 floors that werent burning the steel would be in perfect condition! plus the buildings fell at freefa!! Yes freefall the building should have slowed downed as it collased in the path of most resistance! but yet as you say it fell in14 sec others say it fell in 9sec. Anyways that is the sign of demolition!
@American2Revolution No not exactly he said "pull it". And because it is a pronoun, it can refer to the mission. The guy who said is the owner of the building, it is state or federal law that firefighters cannot stop putting out the fire unless it out or give permission by the owner. Since the fires were already out of control not much would have been saved. So he agree to pull it, it also could = pull them out.
@American2Revolution You still think any of the building fell at free fall. Give me the height and the time of what you can gather, and I can show you whether or not is free fall.
To "GET" these people, who knew (advanced knowledge) about this but did nothing would take a massive amount of money and legal backing to which the likes have never before been seen. These men have No moral fibre. The world is owned and run by corporations not the government! Live youre life, help people, dont fear change!
Comment removed
unclesamsnephew666 4 weeks ago
@ShaneWilliamsHitler
I dont have to try, especially with a truthtard. The intelligence of a tree in my backyard dwarfs you idiots.
unclesamsnephew666 4 weeks ago
Why Silverstein, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Pearl and Guilliani still not are convicted for mass murder is the sign of the total corruption of the complete US society. ponerology,com
hansvisie 1 month ago
@hansvisie
the reason is there is no evidence. none. ZERO.
the truth movement has failed to prove anything remotely close to inside job on 9/11.
unclesamsnephew666 1 month ago
@unclesamsnephew666 dickhead
ShaneWilliamsHitler 1 month ago
@ShaneWilliamsHitler
when a bigoted, retarded jerkoff truthtard like you calls me a dickhead, that's like getting a wonderful compliment from an intelligent and thoughtful friend.
unclesamsnephew666 1 month ago
@hansvisie
no, it is the sign that there is ZERO evidence of inside job, no matter how much you WANT it to be an inside job.
ever consider that? ever wonder why you want 9/11 to be an inside job so much?
what void does it fill in your pathetic life?
unclesamsnephew666 1 month ago
Just a terrible terrible video no supporting facts
redsox9890 6 months ago
WTC-7 is what make me change my mind, It is impossible for 48 story building to fall like that , reason FIRE.
29 Story building in Belgrade was hit by multiple missiles during USA government criminal actions in Serbia 1999 and was burning all night did not collapse it was just cleaned and rebuild in 2005. And other big buildings walls collapse but whole building to fall like that as WTC-7 simply not possible with FIRE.
aviomaster 7 months ago
And pull is not a demolition term
redsox9890 9 months ago
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@American2Revolution but not one demolition company uses the term pull it to demolish a building. Also do you think that larry slverstein would be stupid enough to announce to the whole world that it was demolished. he was reffering to pulling the firefighters out of the area because there was a giant whole at the bottom of wtc7. and the building had almost no support.
redsox9890 8 months ago
@redsox9890 sure they do... I have heard a guy call several demo co's and ask this question... they all knew what pull it meant.
you haven't seen the video of the firefighters telling people to get away as the building is coming down?
what great instinct considering it's the first time in history fire has melted steel, causing the collapse! 3 times in one day!
what, did the so-called terrorists use 'jihad juice' to melt the steel?
cheney authorized attack on pentagon: /watch?v=THlZ-Rd-lig
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@American2Revolution i actually feel bad for you. you think im brainwashed? you are the brainwashed one
redsox9890 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@American2Revolution you have some serious problems. i cannot believe that you could honestly think that pearl harbor, the lusitania, and 9/11 were all done by the government. you think that we're brainwashed? you sound crazy if you honestly believe that these tradgic events were all done to justify war. and again why would larry seilveratein broadcast to the entire world that it was qn inside job. dont you think that would hqve been on some type of news chqnnel?
redsox9890 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@American2Revolution also the reason it was the first time that a steel framed building had collapsed was becaus it was the first time a building hqd been hit by a 10 ton jet voing the speed of a bullet with 10,000 gallons of fuel. and the reason wtc7 fell was because ther was a giant hole covefing 25 percent of th base if u hqdnt noticed that.
redsox9890 7 months ago
@American2Revolution
"pull it" in demo terms means to literally attach steel cables to a building and pull it down with heavy machinery (like bulldozers, tractors, etc)
is that what you think happened? as long as you want to interpret larry silverstein's words literally, can you provide any evidence that wtc7 was pulled down with cables and bulldozers?
or is this, yet again, another truther rant that was not thought through one bit?
unclesamsnephew666 1 month ago
This doesn't make sense the reason the mayor newt would collapse was because it was burning for a long time anne there had been a giant explosion after a 20 ton jet hit it and when Larry said to pull out he was ordering the fire fighters to pull out.
redsox9890 9 months ago
@redsox9890
pull it... larry said 'pull it'
youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
duh!
NIST ADMITS FREE FALL of WTC7 = EXPLOSIVES ONLY POSSIBILITY!
911 = INSIDE JOB!
'PULL IT' IN WEBSTERS DICTIONARY: demolition: tear down, knock down, pull down
why are americans so brainwashed??
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@American2Revolution
"pull it... larry said 'pull it'"
yes, he used the words "pull it"
he did that while mentioning what was said TO him from someone else.
is this really so complicated? are you this stupid or mentally ill?
if someone related a story to you about another person murdering someone, do you get confused and think the person telling the story committed the murder?
how fucking dumb are you?
unclesamsnephew666 1 month ago
Video lasts 9.11
kerlik777 1 year ago 12
@kerlik777 lol
Travmapunk 9 months ago
use your common sense and not decide to act stupid metal dont disintegrate into dust have you people gone insane, there should have been piles of rubble many stories high and you fools say all three tower go on strike on 9/11 and its components decide not to follow the rules of nature. All your doing your looking like idiots infront of the ones who done it and they are laughing saying didn't I tell you they would believe anything
guidedfox 1 year ago
Comment removed
guidedfox 1 year ago
when the twin -tower complex was built they used CANDLE-WAX instead of steel - ehem ! .... aparently ...either that or the so called terrorists are way in advance of anything we are caperble of - should not there be a full inquiry on what happened so that we can find out so this shit cannot happen again ...
55mandreck 1 year ago
How the fuck did he win his insurance case? I want to know who was on that jury.
hmsixsixsix 1 year ago
these where the only 3 towers in history that supposedly came down due to fire. The people who believe this are the most stupid peice of scums on earth, and on the day of judgement they will be a part of this for supporting such crap. Tell you the truth they are no different to the people who planned it they are a part of this, you will hardly find a single person who lost their family supporting this its only the fools the monkeys and donkeys whos got nothing to loose assholes
guidedfox 1 year ago
there is so many stupid people on this planet if i was to tell them it was my fart that made it go down they would belive it. silverstein told people he spoke to a person telling them to pull it but when he was in a press conference he was asked who he spoke to cause no one had knowledge of speaking to him he refused to answer. every morning he has breakfast in the towers but that day he decided not to go he even called his daughter to get out of the second tower before it took place
guidedfox 1 year ago
@guidedfox Odd how the guy debunking this stuff comes off much more intelligent than you or any of the other college potheads running around telling the "sheeple" to "wake up" to some shitty documentary they watched likely made by some other college pothead.
FuckingStanz 1 year ago
@FuckingStanz Odd how you dont even have a clue of what you<re talking about and still talk shit, the sheeple NEEDS to wake up, but you probably wont, just go watch tv or something.
DREwestcoast 1 year ago 3
@DREwestcoast Yet another cliche psuedo-enlightened pretentious fluff comment from another conspiracy theorist. I don't watch TV. I watch a healthy dose of documentaries, and this conspiracy is almost as lolable as "Project Blue Beam".
FuckingStanz 1 year ago
@FuckingStanz
NIST ADMITS FREE FALL of WTC7 = EXPLOSIVES ONLY POSSIBILITY!
911 = INSIDE JOB!
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@FuckingStanz debubk this:
NIST ADMITS FREE FALL of WTC7 = EXPLOSIVES ONLY POSSIBILITY!
Cheney allowing the attack on 911?
/watch?v=THlZ-Rd-lig
911 = INSIDE JOB!
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@copenhagenlct And your comment of free fall. Yes, the building slowed down from lower collisions, but then it is not free fall. The reason they use freefall as proof of explosion is that the explosions would reduce building into small enough particles to not cause resistance. Even though they'd be wrong cause demolition teams don't place enough explosives to disintegrate all of it.
Watch the fucking videos yourself, don't really on what others say. It did not happen in 9s.
drax325 1 year ago
@copenhagenlct First the steel didn't need to be melted to break the structure. Steel loses half of it's strength @~600C , and all strength (the pt we can bend) @1200C. Next jet fuel wasn't the only source of heat. Also,The kinetic energy from impact would increase temperatures (I calc. it to =100tons of dynamite), plus all the shit in the building would burn, plus the large winds would intensify the fire. I
drax325 1 year ago
DUMBASSES: This demolition idea is bullcrap. First, there is no real or non-falsifiable evidence for any of your claims. Plus terrorist continued to attack by suicide bombs in the US and other countries.
Now, I hate to help you idiots out, but with all evidence against your claim it would have been easier for you all to claim it was real, but the terrorists were payed offed or encouraged by our gov't. But, even that is false. If a guy is willing to put a bomb on his balls.. he's serious
drax325 1 year ago
@drax325
Cheney allowing the attack on 911?
/watch?v=THlZ-Rd-lig
NIST ADMITS FREE FALL of WTC7 = EXPLOSIVES ONLY POSSIBILITY!
911 = INSIDE JOB!
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@Kenny123456ish Because larry and all his buddys are in on it.
copenhagenlct 1 year ago
If I lost someone on that day I would be the one who pulled Larry's black soul out of his body.
hmsixsixsix 1 year ago
Pull it - meant to have the firefighter stop trying to put out the fire. It is a coincidence they use pull it demolition stop making false connections, because are too stupid to understand rational thought. This person is so stupid to misrepresent what people are saying.
drax325 1 year ago
@drax325 pull it-means drop the building! Take them out/ pull them out/give it up/release them ect means-"have the firefighters stop trying to put out the fire."
copenhagenlct 1 year ago
@copenhagenlct No it does not mean drop the building in this context. Plus "pull it" is almost an archaic phrase used in demolition. You'll never hear anyone today or just befor 9/11 use that.
Firefighters are not allowed to give up on a fire until given permission. That is why they ask the owner of the building. Who responded with the phrase. Pull it. Means pull "the mission"/ the objective/ or whatever the firefighters call their task. Stop trying to see things that aren't there.
drax325 1 year ago
@drax325 Whatever it means the buildings were brought down in a controled demolition. They feel at FREEFALL speed. The buildings were designed to withhold a plane attack because of there height. But yet the buildings fell in a matter of seconds. there has never been a steel structer building that has collasped due to fire the only ones are the trade towers and building 7!
copenhagenlct 1 year ago
@copenhagenlct The buildings went down after internal fires. So, technically it withstood a plane crash because it did not crash immediately after hit. And it did not fall at free fall speed. I estimate it took the first tower 14(+/- 2)sec. to collapse. And I did the basis calculus: at full height of 1368ft @ free fall speed it would take 9.22sec. The correct free fall speed would from the break height which would be even sooner sqrt(heght of break/1368ft)*9.22sec would give better FF I refer
drax325 1 year ago
@drax325 steel melts at 2700 jet fuel fire temp = 1500 there for steel can not melt! Plus majoity of the fuel burnt on impact! the other 70 floors that werent burning the steel would be in perfect condition! plus the buildings fell at freefa!! Yes freefall the building should have slowed downed as it collased in the path of most resistance! but yet as you say it fell in14 sec others say it fell in 9sec. Anyways that is the sign of demolition!
copenhagenlct 1 year ago
@drax325 I guess webster's dictionary is wrong... demolish; to pull down
you must be hard of hearing... silverstein said, 'pull the mission"?
American2Revolution 8 months ago
@American2Revolution No not exactly he said "pull it". And because it is a pronoun, it can refer to the mission. The guy who said is the owner of the building, it is state or federal law that firefighters cannot stop putting out the fire unless it out or give permission by the owner. Since the fires were already out of control not much would have been saved. So he agree to pull it, it also could = pull them out.
drax325 8 months ago
@American2Revolution You still think any of the building fell at free fall. Give me the height and the time of what you can gather, and I can show you whether or not is free fall.
drax325 8 months ago
@copenhagenlct
yep, just look it up in websters... to pull down; demolish
American2Revolution 8 months ago
To "GET" these people, who knew (advanced knowledge) about this but did nothing would take a massive amount of money and legal backing to which the likes have never before been seen. These men have No moral fibre. The world is owned and run by corporations not the government! Live youre life, help people, dont fear change!
naenaetaylor 1 year ago
EVIL!
naenaetaylor 1 year ago
Compelling evidence, intelligently presented.
Analysticat 1 year ago
America is the breed of terror throughout the world.
Reqrezentin 1 year ago
god bless america LOL
scottcobain27 1 year ago
BuildingWhat org focuses on Building 7.
TonyUnplugged 1 year ago
Silverstein really made a good return on his investment - on the backs of the victims and the American people. Stupid goyem.
mutexnet 1 year ago