The Zionists themselves can tell you about their own crimes and their racist project. And about this stupid statement "the destruction of Israel the only Jewish state and only democracy in the middle east". It's only dismantling a racist regime and a "democracy" only for colonial settler Jews! Words like "Destruction" belong to your apartheid and its daily practices in uprooting the natives to build a "Jewish state" in the 21st century! Do you want to have a Muslim or Christian state next door?!
the jews call themselves intellectuals. hahahha. what a joke. Anyone who doesn't rob cheat murder is fowl huh? quoting david frum. hahhahaha. frum is a crapwad.
The only way you managed to silence Dr. Judt is by not posting the second part of the this video in which I am sure he gave a very answer to your rather ridiculous question. In the end, the truth always triumphs, and in the end, Zionism will succumb.
Of course, you're conversant with Benda's 1927 argument. And if you're not and you can't see Judt's hypocrisy, then you're just as obtuse and duplicitous as he is.
I'm a bit confused, hillels. Are these videos an earnest attempt to presuade people that Judt is being censored, or are they intended as bitter sarcasm?
Your argument is basically an "appeal to authority" just like that of the questioner in the video when he trashes Mersheimer's & co. book without explaining what is wrong with it. Just like him, by not explaining Benda's argument, you try to walk around any debate. Anyway, Benda's argument applies to intellectuals who support a state's action, however immoral, betraying their own ideals. So the argument can certainly be used against intellectuals who support the Israeli state.
The Zionists themselves can tell you about their own crimes and their racist project. And about this stupid statement "the destruction of Israel the only Jewish state and only democracy in the middle east". It's only dismantling a racist regime and a "democracy" only for colonial settler Jews! Words like "Destruction" belong to your apartheid and its daily practices in uprooting the natives to build a "Jewish state" in the 21st century! Do you want to have a Muslim or Christian state next door?!
abumiz 1 year ago
the jews call themselves intellectuals. hahahha. what a joke. Anyone who doesn't rob cheat murder is fowl huh? quoting david frum. hahhahaha. frum is a crapwad.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
The only way you managed to silence Dr. Judt is by not posting the second part of the this video in which I am sure he gave a very answer to your rather ridiculous question. In the end, the truth always triumphs, and in the end, Zionism will succumb.
lionofthejungle 2 years ago 11
I decide for myself what is exceptable and respectable no one else.
infokemp 3 years ago
Universities seem to have lost any sense of freedom. They act like toltalitarian states now.
jplumads 3 years ago 4
Where is part 2?
Or is the title a lie?
hussaiz3 3 years ago
answer: title is a lie... and hillels/aipac must be really hard up, lol.
tessler6868 2 years ago 2
What a goofy political rant, and what a shame that Judt has to waste his time with such people.
1legerdemain1 4 years ago 17
Of course, you're conversant with Benda's 1927 argument. And if you're not and you can't see Judt's hypocrisy, then you're just as obtuse and duplicitous as he is.
hillels 4 years ago
I'm a bit confused, hillels. Are these videos an earnest attempt to presuade people that Judt is being censored, or are they intended as bitter sarcasm?
polymath7 3 years ago
Your argument is basically an "appeal to authority" just like that of the questioner in the video when he trashes Mersheimer's & co. book without explaining what is wrong with it. Just like him, by not explaining Benda's argument, you try to walk around any debate. Anyway, Benda's argument applies to intellectuals who support a state's action, however immoral, betraying their own ideals. So the argument can certainly be used against intellectuals who support the Israeli state.
hawkmoon1948 3 years ago
@hillels Seriously. Stop it.
H8UBACKBABY 1 year ago
Are you really as stupid as you sound?
johncocktostan 3 years ago
i'm sorry, john. was that your aipac-style attempt at argument?
tessler6868 2 years ago
Yeah! can't hear the dude.
usergently 4 years ago
He doesn't have a better microphone. This is from a video camera in the audience and the questioner is closer to the camera than Judt.
mb300sl 4 years ago
of course there is no "moral equivalence" - torture is torture.
KentAllard 4 years ago 2
i dont agree, being water borded and sawed in half are as different as night and day
ned262626 3 years ago
Accused of making statements that aide and abet anti-semites. How come the questioner has a better microphone than the guest speaker?
matt605 5 years ago