Wish the clerk had killed the SOB. Should be a law that store owners allow clerks to carry a gun OR provide them with a bulletproof, safe room.
And yes, it is amazing how quickly these robbers can jump even the highest counter. Hundreds have been murdered when several solutions are at hand..very sad.
He didn't lose his permit over this incident, some time later during a separate incident he brandished his gun WITHOUT being provoked. That is a crime. If he really did it then he deserves to lose his permit.
Australia huh well fuk that law, say a boxer breaks in ur house an jus starts beatin ur ass ? does the Australian goverment want u 2 try an fight bak ? lmao fuk em if they try an rob what u wrk 4 kill em
here in Australia a citizen is only allowed to use 'equal force' to defend themselves. not many guns in society here so you're not allowed to use one to defend yourself in these instances, even if the criminal has a gun. it's not good but the likelyhood of a crim holding you up with a gun is not common. now it's knives, bats, screwdrivers, and just sheer violence.
psychology says that a criminal will bring with them whatever they deem is necessary to complete the crime successfully.
Just because the bad guy is running from you doesn't mean he's no longer a threat. That bad guy could get out to the parking lot, turn around, and start blasting at the store. That's why armed citizens are instructed to "shoot to stop the threat". You aren't shooting to murder, shooting to scare, shooting to injure, or shooting to drop the person. You are shooting simply to stop the threat, nothing more, nothing less.
Reading all those comments from the States cracks me up ... XD
Isn't there a state where it's legal for the clerk to shoot at the customer as they enter the shop, even if the customer doesn't "seem" to be carrying any weapons? I'm mean ... procaution-wise?
@fenriz218 no, but had the clerk been alert to the perp's entrance, he would have had the right to brandish his weapon based on a reasonable suspicion he was about to be robbed (by a hooded suspect).
I saw the same video but longer: after all this the clerk returns with gun in one hand and cell phone in another apparently making 911 call about the incident...
POSTERS: when posting someone's else videos, don't cripple them, post the whole thing!
Here in AZ you can pretty much shoot the assailant anytime after they have threatened or tried to harm you physically. You can't, lets say, go to his house the following Monday and open fire, but we don't play around with silly technicalities here. Happens A LOT. Some guy about a month ago was being attacked and robbed of his beer, he ran to his vehicle got his gun, chased the guy down and shot him. He wasn't charged with a thing either. God I love Arizona!
@HerdoRalden yep, i know the one your talking about, it was at the circle k on power south of elliot, i live about 5 miles from it and wife works 1/4 mile from it. the shooter walked out with his case of beer and got mugged in the parking lot and hit in the head with a wrench, ran to his truck got his gun and fallowed BG around back, BG hit him again with wrench while man was trying to retrieve his property... needless to say, BG lost and shooter wasnt charged. =) Arizona is a fine state
pause at 00:28...he almost hit him in the back of the head! missed by 6-8", awesome. Talk about a bad shift, as if working Christmas wasn't bad enough.
@cheech85086 i work at a conv store and for some reason hollidays have more robbers looters and vandals than normal days. with the exception of mothers day. where cig beer and lottery ticket sales plummet. holloween you got to be on your A game and confront everybody in a costume.
kk so was the robber armed? and the clerk took his gun away? or did the robber just jump the counter hoping to overpower the clerk but the clerk was armed so he ran off? or were they both armed and the cowardly robber ran like a bitch when he saw it was a fair fight?
@markbotv3 The robber was armed with a knife, the clerk was armed with a pistol. The clerk did hit the robber once, but missed once as well, which is what you see breaking the glass of the door.
@khouaxiong the police ALWAYS have the power to charge or not. Typically, they consult with the DA's office. If a DA becomes aware and feels they acted in error, he may charge later. One does not have to be charged on day 1.
good fight but CC people when the suspect is running away please don't keep shooting especially in the dark! there are innocent people that could be walking are sleeping in their homes that could get hit by your strays. its not worth getting charged with man slaughter just to teach the suspect a lesson
the law here in NY states that you cannot shoot some one who is running, even if he or she has severly hurt you or an officer. Its complete bullshit... thats why i dont use a 9mm you dotn worry aboutthem running. they just fuckin drop on the first shot!
@DXsukIT I'm not sure you are correct. I am pretty sure if the person has attempted a violent crime with a weapon, and is deemed an ongoing danger to others immediately, they can be shot. In almost all situations, the correct thing is to NOT shoot a fleeing suspect. Hopefully, they are put down on the scene and the police see it as a justifiable shooting. I would not want to be judged by a jury of my "peers", as I think most people today are weak and characterless.
@peicemakerSS22 ya but then a few weeks later he went around pulling his gun out unprovoked like a fool. In a split second he went from a legal gun owning citizen to another punk. I am a gun owner, but i know when to show it and when not to show it. This video is a perfect example of when to use it, but the description of later events is a perfect example of stupidity.
@mtz313 I firmly believe two things, relative to the subject. 1. almost no one should know you carry....keeps people from falsely claiming you "brandished" or ambushing you. 2. You should ONLY draw your weapon when legal to fire. What if you pull it and have an accidental discharge and it WASN'T legal to shoot? Draw, shoot, call 911. Anything else, to me, is hollywood nonsense and dangerous.
My favorite part was at 0:16 That guy was just like.. doot de doot de doooo, I'm just strolling into the store with a pillow case on my head.. nothing out of the ordinary
the video is clear the robber was already fleeing before the clerk started firing the gun. The clerk was firing at a fleeing man. The clerk was not using reasonable force as at that point he was not defending himself but was a revenge shooting. I don't disagree with that morally I would have done the same thing but legally he was incorrect that is why he got the gun removed
And in Pennsylvania, where this took place, you do not need any sort of license. There is no licensing process for gun ownership to begin with and in PA you can openly carry a firearm with no training or license completely legally, you can use a gun to defend your home, car or place of employment without a license.
PA's "license to carry" only applies for CONCEALING A WEAPON under your clothing. You don't actually need a license to carry openly.
@metalfaust19 "...don't need a license to carry openly..". Which is absurd in that if one carries openly, there is a greater chance of being ambushed to get the gun. When concealed, no one is nervous, except the criminals who can't tell who is packing. There should be no requirement for carrying any weapon concealed. USING a weapon during commission of a crime should draw a SEVERE penalty.
something thats fucking bull shit....The clerk, however, lost his handgun license in a subsequent incident of unprovoked brandishing of his weapon.
How is that fucking justice?!?!? if he didnt have that gun he would be dead! how can they take his licence to carry it away!? Fuck america and their injustices!
You're clearly not thinking straight. You can have a justified shoot, but if you do something stupid with your gun on another occasion, then it's your fault.
Here in Nevada there are not many robberies of individuals, home invasions or car jackings because most of us are ARMED. Not that many blacks or slime bag type Mexicans up here neither, they don't like the cold AND the fact they'd get their fucking asses shot off if they tried anything.
@albertocorrales1 I think you have it wrong. Everyone would agree that it is the mexispics that bang their own daughters/sisters/ chiwawas/ whatever. Plus, if you really are mexican, how can you afford a computer? Let alone have the brains to run it??? Gee wiz
Simple hypothetical here. Guy and girl walking on street. Some dude tries to rob them. The guy shoots the dude in his nasty pus-dripping face and he dies like a dog. Take away the gun and what do you have? Guy and girl beaten to death because dude was worried they might ID him. 2 innocents dead vs. one d-bag killed the hell out of. Which outcome is better? I should point out that most of this anti gun shit comes from people with Secret Service protective details.
@sadohenker666 That's B.S. - What if that "person" (and I use that term loosley) just burst into your home and killed all of your family members ? and you come running out with a gun in your hand just in time to see them spinning and heading for the front door, what would you do ? shoot , or no shoot ? me personanly that S.O.B. is a dead man !
@docjohnson92 - You don't know SHIT Doc. The avarage rounds fired at a suspect by US Police was 20 in 2009. Less than 16% of those 20 hit the targets. Eat a bowl of dicks cops can't shoot for shit including yourself.
@docjohnson92 - You don't know SHIT Doc. The average rounds fired at a suspect by US Police was 20 in 2009. Less than 16% of those 20 hit the targets. Eat a bowl of dicks cops can't shoot for shit including yourself.
@BlackRainClothing You are truely an idot. There's a big fucking difference between what cops do and target shooting. It's a whole different ballgame when what your shooting at is shooting back at you.
@BlackRainClothing your comment shows you to be ignorant, in more ways than one. First, I'd like the source of your stats. They may be 100% accurate, but no one could possibly know until you provide the source. Next, a firefight has many factors. In war, many more shots are fired with a lower hit count. Not because people can't shoot, but because of the myriad of factors involved (lighting, stress, cover, distance, etc.). Lastly, you can't possibly know if "doc" is a good shot.
@docjohnson92 wow, I live in Canada and what you just said would make the politicians and lawmakers (same shit) here have a heart attack! protect your property? your life? what? my goodness the faster I can come to America the happier i'll be! there was recently a grocer who apprehended a thug after he stole something from his store, he held him for police. police charged him with kidnapping and some other bogus charges. he did get off, but what a fight! stupid Canadian laws. god bless America
@fcarabat I wouldnt go saying that. The democrat politicians here want anyone who used a gun in self defense to burn at the stake. In america, criminals have more rights than law abiding citizens. Besides, America is going down the tubes. I've been thinking of moving to canada. I just dont know how well canada will fare once america falls.
I dont know why I even commented; most of the comments on here are probobaly done by adolescent children. Anyway when you turn 21get a gun shoot someone in the back and tell me how that goes. There are Law enforcement officers that go down for shooting unarmed suspects in the back. Do you feel you are above them? Better yet just ask a LEO " Is it ok if someone beats me up and robs me , and while there running away I shoot them in the back?". I can imagine the look you will get.
Here in this free state, you have the right to use lethal force in the immediate pursuit of the commission of a violent felony.
You don't know that he won't just turn around and start shooting when he gets a little distance between you, i would still be fearing for my life in that situation, i would be defending mine and anybodies life around as i shot him in the back until he went down.
@payphonebone The Texas legal term (if im correct) is "Fresh Pursuit" and you are correct sir. Thats a real tough decision to make to shoot someone runnning away from you but you are correct that he could just be trying to get some distance to come right back.
@TehHonda That is a terrifically dangerous proposition. If a person is running away, it is best to take cover and call 911. THE REASON is not "cowardice" but your liability. Let's say you shoot the guy (or miss) and the bullet hits someone else. You WILL be in court, whether criminal or civil. Should the perp come back, you can always shoot them then. Hopefully you put them down.
@payphonebone you made a joke, and i lol'd, thank you. I dont know your defense laws, but i do know a bit about your carry laws, you said "free state" that was the funny part, you cant even OC for the most part... free... lol. if you want free, move to AZ or new hampshire...
@payphonebone it's like a twilight zone in the US compared to up here in Canada. you guys down there seem to appreciate LOGIC more than many people up here. we rely on the police to keep us safe at ALL times. if they're not around, then we just pray for our lives. i'm really sick of it here. not worthy of a flag.
@Armoredlamb you don't shoot him in the back. You shoot him several times in the chest and head as he was hopping the counter. He was threat to you and you feared for your life. Good Shoot says the DA. You go home. He goes to the morgue.
@payphonebone Not to tarnish your argument too much here, but the text reads that the robber had a knife. If he had both a knife and a handgun, why would he use his knife when performing the robbery?
These are the sorts of things that would be considered in court, and adding that he was fleeing the scene with his back to you, and you had seen he only had a knife, it would be hard to maintain your life was in immediate danger, especially if you're pursuing and continuing shooting.
Too many variables to think about in a split second when you're trying to defend your life. The court will throw all that nit picky shit out and just focus on the fact that your life was threatened and you defended yourself.
@payphonebone You're not defending your life when you're chasing the guy and trying to shoot him. The guy is running away from you - your primary job is then to call the cops.
If you had chased the thief, shot him while his back was to you and killed him, and then called the cops, you'd be in a huge predicament when explaining to the judge why it was necessary to shoot a fleeing person to defend your own body from harm. The law is definitely not on your side, I'm afraid.
@payphonebone Look, the issue is that the only instance when you're justified in killing another person is when your life is in immediate danger. It isn't when the person is already out of the store, and YOU pursue HIM. (If anything putting yourself in harms way voluntarily, not self-defense)
The law needs to be very strict on when one citizen may legally kill another. The instance you're talking about where you shoot a person who's got his back to you, you're not justified.
@Norwification You have genevese syndrome, you're suffering from the bystander effect.
I don't really care about your opinions on morals. I'm only arguing the LAW.
Where I live, the law would cover me if the situation i describe.
That's all there is to it. I would definitely not hire you for my lawyer, and i would definitely not be doing any jail time. This is what they call a "no bill"
God bless a free Texas and all the free people in it!
@Norwification You have genevese syndrome, you're suffering from the bystander effect.
I don't really care about your opinions on morals. I'm only arguing the LAW.
Where I live, the law would cover me if the situation i describe.
That's all there is to it. I would definitely not hire you for my lawyer, and i would definitely not be doing any jail time. This is what they call a "no bill"
God bless a free Texas and all the free people in it!
@payphonebone It's a case of imperfect-self defense. In other words, you think you need to act the way you do in order to protect yourself, but it isn't the reality of the situation.
In Texas, the only justified way of shooting a thief with stolen property (which this guy doesn't have) is to prove it is the only way to recover the property. If he is running away from you, Texas does not recognize it as self defense from bodily harm to kill him. It's manslaughter. It just is...
@Norwification not true.. texas state statue pc9.32 you have the right to self defence from an Assault, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, attempted robbery or any thief commitment at night time and you CAN shoot a fleeing suspect in the back......look it up...........we love texas law
@barstoolguru im sorry..i believe that if some one is brave enough to rob you there brave enough to get every thing thats in store for them...but to shoot someone who is running away from a robbery is some pussy shit...BUT if the person did cause physical harm and fleeing by all means empty out your mag...i know it seem like im contradicting my self but shooting some one in the back is like kicking a retard in the balls
@b5150b2012 pussy shit; what if he comes back and caps you ass? is that puss shit? you don't know what his Intentions are, the clirk is a sitting duck for when he comes back and maybe the second time don't want to leave any witnesses. is that pussy shit? by the way your medtifors suck or maybe you are the retard ?
But you gotta look at it from tose who don't have that type of honor, there are people who would gladly shoot you in the back, and many in fact who prefer it, like the drive by shooting for example. You can't live life with this set of morals if your the only one who really respects them, it'll only end up hurting you in the end.
@b5150b2012 "i believe that if some one is brave enough to rob you there brave enough to get every thing thats in store for them" Sense when does it take bravery to commit the cowardly act of robbery. They do it because most clerks are told to give them what they want and not fight back.
@tjsnaps oh i take it you want to argue the use of the word brave huh...its cool...be a dick about it...better yet look up the definition of the word and how it was use...then come back and make the same comment...
@Norwification not true.. texas state statue pc9.32 you have the right to self defence from an Assault, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, attempted robbery or any thief Committed at night time and you CAN shoot a fleeing suspect in the back......look it up...........we love texas law
@payphonebone I'm not arguing my moral stance on the point, either. I'm only concerned with the law too, that's why I use words like "justified," they are part of the legal terminology. I'm sort of astonished you'd think I was arguing from an ethical standpoint - hardly what I've conveyed at all.
I also think it highly unprofessional to accuse me of bystander effect and also wrongly accuse me of a method of arguing I haven't utilized at all. I'm arguing the law - you're making claims about me.
@Norwification The problem is that we obviously don't live under the same laws. In Texas where I live, I am a free person and can handle the situation in exactly the way i described and be covered under the terms of the law.
Just because it's different wherever you are doesn't make the way i handle the situation wrong.
@payphonebone I'm saying your actions wouldn't be legal by Texas law either. If the thief had managed to steal anything- they would be, because it's reclaiming property. But he didn't, and your life is not in danger (by law) if you are chasing someone who has their back turned to you (back turned is a big deal in law).
It becomes a big deal if you kill someone, not if he's injured. But if you do kill him in pursuing him, you can be convicted of manslaughter. Fair? Maybe not. But it is the law.
@Norwification you can still shoot a gun backwards while running ! no such thing as a back turned law here in Florida ! this guy tried to kill him ! I would have done the same thing only I don't miss !
Threat was gone? How do you know? The nigger may be waiting outside or have armed accomplices waiting to bust in and kill you. You have to shoot to kill and get these scum off the streets. Do you want to pay $40K/year to support maggots like these in jail?
If a crim has a gun and is running away, you should fire. A lot of robbers shoot over the shoulder while running away. Or, they could at any time stop, turn around and begin firing, sending bullets in your direction. If they are 200 ft out, they could still pose a lethal threat to you or anyone else in the area for that matter! Just because the criminal maniac seems to be leaving, does not mean that the danger is gone.
One less thief on the streets. If you worked somewhere and somebody comes in and starts stomping you so they can get away with a couple hundred dollars they deserve to be shot, several times. However shooting out the door was not safe. You must always be sure of what you are shooting towards.
You're a moron thedarkallies! You have the right and the responsibility to defend yourself, your property, and your livelihood. That clerk should've killed the robber before the cops get the chance to arrest him because arresting and incarcerating criminals costs a lot of money. Bullets are cheap in comparison.
First problem I have is that the gun was "licensed". You don't need a license to exercise a RIGHT. Proof that this is a bad idea is evidenced by the fact that (supposedly) his "license" / 2nd Amendment RIGHT was "revoked" due to the fact that he attempted to defend himself. If someone threatens MY life, and I manage to get the upper hand, I'll shoot that fucker IN THE BACK as long as it's a continuation of the incident INITIATED by the perp. Why let the dirtbag live to pull the same shit again?
Hey! I'm a democrat and strongly disagree with getting rid of second amendment rights or tampering with them in the slightest bit. I'm curious to know -- as a resident of PA, why did the clerk get his carry license taken away.. because he ran after the assailant?
not even :( if you so much as flash it in public, you could get in trouble. So if you want to show how cool your new glock 40 is to your buddy on the bus, side of street, restaurant etc. (I hate glocks btw) do it somewhere private.
"Unprovoked brandishing of his weapon" means he pulled his gun out for something stupid, like an argument with a neighbor or because a Jehova's witness came to his door. You can't pull a gun just to show people how bad you are.
in certain states you have the my castle law... that states if you are in your place of work, car, or home and feel a justafiable threat to you life you can legal shoot an indavidual dead even if it is in the back.
depends on what state you live in, i know in TX and many others if they are on your property i.e. the jesus freaks woke you up at 7am on sunday if you have a no tresspassing sign up you can indeed pull a weapon on them and tell them to GTFO without fear of being prosicuted, unlike a number of other liberal ass states.
Actually in PA you can Openly Carry your firearm. I Open Carry EVERYWHERE I GO as do tens of thousands of other pennsylvanians. It is 100% legal. No you cant unholster your weapon in public and show it to people, obviously you will get in trouble. However you DO NOT have to conceal carry in PA with your LTCF.
Its a License To Carry Firearms, NOT a concealed carry permit.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
His friend is claiming, Richard Popalowski bought the gun because he "feared" President Obama was going to ban guns; well, loolie, lookie here, this is where ignorance become terminal. I hope he enjoys the future that Rush Limpballs & the crying psycho Glenn Beck. lead him too. Did they check to see if he had planned on attending a "tea party" on April 15th or if he had installed a doom room yet? FAUX news will get you every time. How many mass murderers have they minted so far?
right so four year old children that are killed in cross fire between a gang war aren't innocent? It's fuckers like you that need to be shot, if u wana kill each other fine do the world a favour but dont take others with you
now that bush is gone, USA is awesome.....when the fuckin zombies come, USA citizens are gonna live, canada might as well just bend over.. the government doesnt want us to have guns cause we might just get fed up with their oppression!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
no the government dont want you to have guns becuase they give them to dumbasses like you that think zombies are gunna come to this world and ur are most likely to kill someone innocent with it
I live in Canada. I HAVE TO GET A PERMIT TO TAKE MY GUN (a small 9mm) TO THE GUN RANGE, AND I NEED A PERMIT (takes forever) TO TRANSPORT MY GUN TO ANOTHER HOUSE, and if i stop to piss, i could lose my liscese and get in shit. GO AMERICA.
and did you know that theres less crime where theres more guns, what bergler is gonna bust into a house full of hicks? in CAnada our government penalizes the legal gun owners, even though the criminals dont liscense there guns,the CANADIAN GOVERNMENT areNAZIS
It's cool to see a Canadian who has his head on straight! Once in awhile I talk to an Australian who believes in freedom too. Maybe it's time to leave the homeland; Freedom lovers welcome!
Hey pro ccw people....stop scaring of other races! stupidity comes in every color........ as does goodness! Hate the real enemy!
area51sealteam6 2 weeks ago
black again.
i guess slavery made him do it.
gaydanzig 1 month ago
Boy, what a crappy job when you have to go to work with a gun in your holster.....
winrx 2 months ago
why are 95% of these robbers black?
city950 3 months ago
@city950 you are wrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong! it's 99.9999999%
jesse10x 2 months ago
All the robbers on Youtube look alike.....black.
RunThemAll 4 months ago
@RunThemAll Really ?
NB5BHVL 3 months ago
the right to protect yourself what a crazzy idea
MANICISBACK 4 months ago
Wish the clerk had killed the SOB. Should be a law that store owners allow clerks to carry a gun OR provide them with a bulletproof, safe room.
And yes, it is amazing how quickly these robbers can jump even the highest counter. Hundreds have been murdered when several solutions are at hand..very sad.
samthecat07 5 months ago
this happened in south-west Pennsylvania. I know because it was on the local new a long time ago.
a2redneck 6 months ago
its funny how they run away once that victim has a gun. why run now coward?
cougarkllr1 6 months ago
Sucks he lost his permit.
diggingforgold 8 months ago
@diggingforgold
He didn't lose his permit over this incident, some time later during a separate incident he brandished his gun WITHOUT being provoked. That is a crime. If he really did it then he deserves to lose his permit.
tubevideoguy762 7 months ago
His first shot missed his head by like 4 inches, good shooting.
936Juggalos 8 months ago
hey, who's to say the robber didnt go outside and try to rob someone else at gunpoint. its ok to defend the lives of others too.
mryuck22 9 months ago
Was foils a pun? :)
G3org3Master 9 months ago
Australia huh well fuk that law, say a boxer breaks in ur house an jus starts beatin ur ass ? does the Australian goverment want u 2 try an fight bak ? lmao fuk em if they try an rob what u wrk 4 kill em
1985mrchavez 9 months ago
here in Australia a citizen is only allowed to use 'equal force' to defend themselves. not many guns in society here so you're not allowed to use one to defend yourself in these instances, even if the criminal has a gun. it's not good but the likelyhood of a crim holding you up with a gun is not common. now it's knives, bats, screwdrivers, and just sheer violence.
psychology says that a criminal will bring with them whatever they deem is necessary to complete the crime successfully.
1AussieAvenger1 10 months ago
wounded criminals deserve to get left to die, then healed.
toontown544 11 months ago
all scum bags need to be liquidated, heres to a new year where many of them die choking on their own blood
pjicleanair420 1 year ago
isnt it murder when you shoot someone when theyre running from you? even if they tried to rob you?
cardik0808 1 year ago
@cardik0808,
Just because the bad guy is running from you doesn't mean he's no longer a threat. That bad guy could get out to the parking lot, turn around, and start blasting at the store. That's why armed citizens are instructed to "shoot to stop the threat". You aren't shooting to murder, shooting to scare, shooting to injure, or shooting to drop the person. You are shooting simply to stop the threat, nothing more, nothing less.
diggingforgold 1 year ago 11
@cardik0808 In some states it is (unfortunately).
leroy592 1 year ago
@cardik0808
No...police do it all the time. It's called stopping a fleeing felon.
Cowbelltheoneandonly 1 year ago
Reading all those comments from the States cracks me up ... XD
Isn't there a state where it's legal for the clerk to shoot at the customer as they enter the shop, even if the customer doesn't "seem" to be carrying any weapons? I'm mean ... procaution-wise?
Texas?
fenriz218 1 year ago
@fenriz218 no, but had the clerk been alert to the perp's entrance, he would have had the right to brandish his weapon based on a reasonable suspicion he was about to be robbed (by a hooded suspect).
kenfo0 1 year ago
am i the only one who noticed the robber practically flew over the counter like a fucking werewolf or some shit?
BALJIT147 1 year ago 33
I saw the same video but longer: after all this the clerk returns with gun in one hand and cell phone in another apparently making 911 call about the incident...
POSTERS: when posting someone's else videos, don't cripple them, post the whole thing!
yuowatcher 1 year ago
Here in AZ you can pretty much shoot the assailant anytime after they have threatened or tried to harm you physically. You can't, lets say, go to his house the following Monday and open fire, but we don't play around with silly technicalities here. Happens A LOT. Some guy about a month ago was being attacked and robbed of his beer, he ran to his vehicle got his gun, chased the guy down and shot him. He wasn't charged with a thing either. God I love Arizona!
HerdoRalden 1 year ago
@HerdoRalden yep, i know the one your talking about, it was at the circle k on power south of elliot, i live about 5 miles from it and wife works 1/4 mile from it. the shooter walked out with his case of beer and got mugged in the parking lot and hit in the head with a wrench, ran to his truck got his gun and fallowed BG around back, BG hit him again with wrench while man was trying to retrieve his property... needless to say, BG lost and shooter wasnt charged. =) Arizona is a fine state
mrh20082008 1 year ago
pause at 00:28...he almost hit him in the back of the head! missed by 6-8", awesome. Talk about a bad shift, as if working Christmas wasn't bad enough.
cheech85086 1 year ago
@cheech85086 i work at a conv store and for some reason hollidays have more robbers looters and vandals than normal days. with the exception of mothers day. where cig beer and lottery ticket sales plummet. holloween you got to be on your A game and confront everybody in a costume.
markbotv3 1 year ago
I think that one changes from state to state. Once the threat is gone, you cannot continue shooting here in Missouri.
ChrisBeaver24 1 year ago
kk so was the robber armed? and the clerk took his gun away? or did the robber just jump the counter hoping to overpower the clerk but the clerk was armed so he ran off? or were they both armed and the cowardly robber ran like a bitch when he saw it was a fair fight?
markbotv3 1 year ago
@markbotv3 The robber was armed with a knife, the clerk was armed with a pistol. The clerk did hit the robber once, but missed once as well, which is what you see breaking the glass of the door.
Jesses001 1 year ago
So when did police officer has the power to rule if a shooting is justified?
khouaxiong 1 year ago
@khouaxiong the police ALWAYS have the power to charge or not. Typically, they consult with the DA's office. If a DA becomes aware and feels they acted in error, he may charge later. One does not have to be charged on day 1.
kenfo0 1 year ago
good fight but CC people when the suspect is running away please don't keep shooting especially in the dark! there are innocent people that could be walking are sleeping in their homes that could get hit by your strays. its not worth getting charged with man slaughter just to teach the suspect a lesson
mgonza29 1 year ago
the law here in NY states that you cannot shoot some one who is running, even if he or she has severly hurt you or an officer. Its complete bullshit... thats why i dont use a 9mm you dotn worry aboutthem running. they just fuckin drop on the first shot!
DXsukIT 1 year ago
@DXsukIT I'm not sure you are correct. I am pretty sure if the person has attempted a violent crime with a weapon, and is deemed an ongoing danger to others immediately, they can be shot. In almost all situations, the correct thing is to NOT shoot a fleeing suspect. Hopefully, they are put down on the scene and the police see it as a justifiable shooting. I would not want to be judged by a jury of my "peers", as I think most people today are weak and characterless.
kenfo0 1 year ago
it looked like dude was playing leap frog!
blacksuite1 1 year ago 2
That's why you don't rob people you fucking moron!
PunanyFingerz 1 year ago
"The clerk, however, lost his handgun license in a subsequent incident of unprovoked brandishing of his weapon."
Went to his head imo.
dopemelody 1 year ago
Either way, that clerk would probably be dead today if he didn't have that gun.
booya155 1 year ago
why would they remove his carry permit? did he not do the cops a favor and wound the guy so the cops could get an arrest?
peicemakerSS22 1 year ago
@peicemakerSS22 ya but then a few weeks later he went around pulling his gun out unprovoked like a fool. In a split second he went from a legal gun owning citizen to another punk. I am a gun owner, but i know when to show it and when not to show it. This video is a perfect example of when to use it, but the description of later events is a perfect example of stupidity.
mtz313 1 year ago
@mtz313 oh i didnt read that. what a fool.
peicemakerSS22 1 year ago
@mtz313 I only show mine a split second before I put a tight three center mass. You only get to see my gun once.
cheftell22 1 year ago
@cheftell22 what a rough cunt
Ryanrulz7387 1 year ago
@cheftell22 yes, because you are constantly shooting criminals.....pffft.
kenfo0 1 year ago
@mtz313 I firmly believe two things, relative to the subject. 1. almost no one should know you carry....keeps people from falsely claiming you "brandished" or ambushing you. 2. You should ONLY draw your weapon when legal to fire. What if you pull it and have an accidental discharge and it WASN'T legal to shoot? Draw, shoot, call 911. Anything else, to me, is hollywood nonsense and dangerous.
kenfo0 1 year ago
My favorite part was at 0:16 That guy was just like.. doot de doot de doooo, I'm just strolling into the store with a pillow case on my head.. nothing out of the ordinary
p20 1 year ago
I live 10 seconds away from this 7-11 haha! no idea this happened.
Oikoga1 1 year ago
If everyone had a Gun.... Nobody would attempt a robbery.
Note: Switzerland and Isreal have almost Zero Crime.... Why??
They all have guns, along with 2 years maditory military training on how to use them.
manchen57 1 year ago
@manchen57 and the military there lets them take their military weapon home!
The870Express 1 year ago
wounded criminals should be left to die rather than healed
madman779sn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@madman779sn "wounded criminals should be left to die rather than healed">>
that is indecent and un-Christian.
kenfo0 1 year ago
the video is clear the robber was already fleeing before the clerk started firing the gun. The clerk was firing at a fleeing man. The clerk was not using reasonable force as at that point he was not defending himself but was a revenge shooting. I don't disagree with that morally I would have done the same thing but legally he was incorrect that is why he got the gun removed
beginnersgambling 1 year ago
@beginnersgambling Wrong. Use of DEADLY FORCE is AUTHORIZED in the IMMEDIATE aftermath of a FELONY. ARMED ROBBERY=FELONY
Oikoga1 1 year ago
i dont even get wat happened.......
wienyhutjr 1 year ago
Your 2nd Amendment should be the only document you need to carry a gun.
kornfreak34 1 year ago 36
@kornfreak34 nice comment!!!
lbizzythefire 1 year ago
@kornfreak34
Damn straight, brother!
thenomadboots1 1 year ago
The Bill of Rights makes no mention of need for license.
In fact freedom does not require a license.
License all those who infringe freedom.
Revoloushun 1 year ago 4
And in Pennsylvania, where this took place, you do not need any sort of license. There is no licensing process for gun ownership to begin with and in PA you can openly carry a firearm with no training or license completely legally, you can use a gun to defend your home, car or place of employment without a license.
PA's "license to carry" only applies for CONCEALING A WEAPON under your clothing. You don't actually need a license to carry openly.
metalfaust19 1 year ago
@metalfaust19 Didn't know that. What's the age needed to purchase your own handgun?
MRSAnary 1 year ago
@metalfaust19 Same is true in Michigan
paintengr 1 year ago
@metalfaust19 "...don't need a license to carry openly..". Which is absurd in that if one carries openly, there is a greater chance of being ambushed to get the gun. When concealed, no one is nervous, except the criminals who can't tell who is packing. There should be no requirement for carrying any weapon concealed. USING a weapon during commission of a crime should draw a SEVERE penalty.
kenfo0 1 year ago
something thats fucking bull shit....The clerk, however, lost his handgun license in a subsequent incident of unprovoked brandishing of his weapon.
How is that fucking justice?!?!? if he didnt have that gun he would be dead! how can they take his licence to carry it away!? Fuck america and their injustices!
plagaes 1 year ago 5
You're clearly not thinking straight. You can have a justified shoot, but if you do something stupid with your gun on another occasion, then it's your fault.
kijishiroukasen 1 year ago 5
I think you misunderstand. The clerk, in a DIFFERENT incident after this one, brandished a gun without cause. He didn't lose it for his actions here.
lartrak 1 year ago
alberto:
Why don't you drag yer skanky ass back to Mexico you fucking taco bender?
carlosmurphy4u 1 year ago 2
@carlosmurphy4u I agree 100%
kustomcougar 1 year ago
Here in Nevada there are not many robberies of individuals, home invasions or car jackings because most of us are ARMED. Not that many blacks or slime bag type Mexicans up here neither, they don't like the cold AND the fact they'd get their fucking asses shot off if they tried anything.
carlosmurphy4u 1 year ago
fuck u im mexican so got fuck ur sister/wife u redneck
albertocorrales1 1 year ago
@albertocorrales1 Way to make your fucking beaner people look like fucking retards.
kustomcougar 1 year ago 2
foo its cool to be mad but sayng shit like that dont help it just gives em racist putos something to argue about thats all they do
killosouth 1 year ago
@albertocorrales1 I think you have it wrong. Everyone would agree that it is the mexispics that bang their own daughters/sisters/ chiwawas/ whatever. Plus, if you really are mexican, how can you afford a computer? Let alone have the brains to run it??? Gee wiz
MrChamp51 1 year ago
Simple hypothetical here. Guy and girl walking on street. Some dude tries to rob them. The guy shoots the dude in his nasty pus-dripping face and he dies like a dog. Take away the gun and what do you have? Guy and girl beaten to death because dude was worried they might ID him. 2 innocents dead vs. one d-bag killed the hell out of. Which outcome is better? I should point out that most of this anti gun shit comes from people with Secret Service protective details.
To quote Crowder, WHUAAAAAA????
tru7hmnb 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
take away the gun and hes beaten to death by ONE MAN
the muthafucka must be weak bitch then lmao
Spike00513z 1 year ago
Texas would be free if you could carry a gun without a permit.
Until then... whoops!
marshaul 2 years ago 4
assault w/ deadly weapon = felony
armed robbery = felony
to stop a fleeing felon = authorized use of deadly force
that is the written word of the laws i enforce every day. the clerk needs to become a better shot
docjohnson92 2 years ago 90
Why aren't there more Police Officers like you in this country?
TribalHeadProduction 2 years ago 8
Unfortunately its because society is in a steady down fall and common sense is not a viable resource anymore
docjohnson92 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@docjohnson92 Shooting someone in the back is never self-defence and it is pathetic no matter what.
sadohenker666 1 year ago
@sadohenker666 well, you can think what you want, but it's justified and the court sees it as self-defense
chex22 1 year ago
@chex22 Of course I think what I want. It is called free will.
sadohenker666 1 year ago
@sadohenker666 That's B.S. - What if that "person" (and I use that term loosley) just burst into your home and killed all of your family members ? and you come running out with a gun in your hand just in time to see them spinning and heading for the front door, what would you do ? shoot , or no shoot ? me personanly that S.O.B. is a dead man !
hunter69denys 1 year ago
@docjohnson92 - You don't know SHIT Doc. The avarage rounds fired at a suspect by US Police was 20 in 2009. Less than 16% of those 20 hit the targets. Eat a bowl of dicks cops can't shoot for shit including yourself.
BlackRainClothing 1 year ago
@docjohnson92 - You don't know SHIT Doc. The average rounds fired at a suspect by US Police was 20 in 2009. Less than 16% of those 20 hit the targets. Eat a bowl of dicks cops can't shoot for shit including yourself.
BlackRainClothing 1 year ago
@BlackRainClothing You are truely an idot. There's a big fucking difference between what cops do and target shooting. It's a whole different ballgame when what your shooting at is shooting back at you.
ariel4more 1 year ago
@BlackRainClothing your comment shows you to be ignorant, in more ways than one. First, I'd like the source of your stats. They may be 100% accurate, but no one could possibly know until you provide the source. Next, a firefight has many factors. In war, many more shots are fired with a lower hit count. Not because people can't shoot, but because of the myriad of factors involved (lighting, stress, cover, distance, etc.). Lastly, you can't possibly know if "doc" is a good shot.
kenfo0 1 year ago
@docjohnson92 wow, I live in Canada and what you just said would make the politicians and lawmakers (same shit) here have a heart attack! protect your property? your life? what? my goodness the faster I can come to America the happier i'll be! there was recently a grocer who apprehended a thug after he stole something from his store, he held him for police. police charged him with kidnapping and some other bogus charges. he did get off, but what a fight! stupid Canadian laws. god bless America
fcarabat 1 year ago 3
@fcarabat i love my country.
iloveloosey101 1 year ago
@iloveloosey101 if you're talking about USA, then i love your country too :)
fcarabat 1 year ago
@fcarabat I wouldnt go saying that. The democrat politicians here want anyone who used a gun in self defense to burn at the stake. In america, criminals have more rights than law abiding citizens. Besides, America is going down the tubes. I've been thinking of moving to canada. I just dont know how well canada will fare once america falls.
theLostTruckerDude 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I dont know why I even commented; most of the comments on here are probobaly done by adolescent children. Anyway when you turn 21get a gun shoot someone in the back and tell me how that goes. There are Law enforcement officers that go down for shooting unarmed suspects in the back. Do you feel you are above them? Better yet just ask a LEO " Is it ok if someone beats me up and robs me , and while there running away I shoot them in the back?". I can imagine the look you will get.
starkidd813 2 years ago
Hopefully they shoot high enough in the back to hit the heart star
charlitunaman2002 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Never legal to shoot someone in the back. Because they are no longer a threat. 1st degree murder.
starkidd813 2 years ago
Not in TX
Here in this free state, you have the right to use lethal force in the immediate pursuit of the commission of a violent felony.
You don't know that he won't just turn around and start shooting when he gets a little distance between you, i would still be fearing for my life in that situation, i would be defending mine and anybodies life around as i shot him in the back until he went down.
payphonebone 2 years ago 71
@payphonebone The Texas legal term (if im correct) is "Fresh Pursuit" and you are correct sir. Thats a real tough decision to make to shoot someone runnning away from you but you are correct that he could just be trying to get some distance to come right back.
TehHonda 1 year ago
@TehHonda That is a terrifically dangerous proposition. If a person is running away, it is best to take cover and call 911. THE REASON is not "cowardice" but your liability. Let's say you shoot the guy (or miss) and the bullet hits someone else. You WILL be in court, whether criminal or civil. Should the perp come back, you can always shoot them then. Hopefully you put them down.
kenfo0 1 year ago
@payphonebone you made a joke, and i lol'd, thank you. I dont know your defense laws, but i do know a bit about your carry laws, you said "free state" that was the funny part, you cant even OC for the most part... free... lol. if you want free, move to AZ or new hampshire...
mrh20082008 1 year ago
@payphonebone it's like a twilight zone in the US compared to up here in Canada. you guys down there seem to appreciate LOGIC more than many people up here. we rely on the police to keep us safe at ALL times. if they're not around, then we just pray for our lives. i'm really sick of it here. not worthy of a flag.
fcarabat 1 year ago 2
@payphonebone The robber had a knife, not a gun. Shooting a fleeing man in the back would land you in prison where I live.
bulldogger71 11 months ago
@bulldogger71 And id go to prison knowing that I stopped the same thing from happing to someone else
Armoredlamb 11 months ago
@Armoredlamb you don't shoot him in the back. You shoot him several times in the chest and head as he was hopping the counter. He was threat to you and you feared for your life. Good Shoot says the DA. You go home. He goes to the morgue.
bulldogger71 10 months ago
@payphonebone Not to tarnish your argument too much here, but the text reads that the robber had a knife. If he had both a knife and a handgun, why would he use his knife when performing the robbery?
These are the sorts of things that would be considered in court, and adding that he was fleeing the scene with his back to you, and you had seen he only had a knife, it would be hard to maintain your life was in immediate danger, especially if you're pursuing and continuing shooting.
Norwification 9 months ago
@Norwification
Too many variables to think about in a split second when you're trying to defend your life. The court will throw all that nit picky shit out and just focus on the fact that your life was threatened and you defended yourself.
case closed
payphonebone 9 months ago
@payphonebone You're not defending your life when you're chasing the guy and trying to shoot him. The guy is running away from you - your primary job is then to call the cops.
If you had chased the thief, shot him while his back was to you and killed him, and then called the cops, you'd be in a huge predicament when explaining to the judge why it was necessary to shoot a fleeing person to defend your own body from harm. The law is definitely not on your side, I'm afraid.
Norwification 9 months ago
@payphonebone Look, the issue is that the only instance when you're justified in killing another person is when your life is in immediate danger. It isn't when the person is already out of the store, and YOU pursue HIM. (If anything putting yourself in harms way voluntarily, not self-defense)
The law needs to be very strict on when one citizen may legally kill another. The instance you're talking about where you shoot a person who's got his back to you, you're not justified.
Norwification 9 months ago
@Norwification You have genevese syndrome, you're suffering from the bystander effect.
I don't really care about your opinions on morals. I'm only arguing the LAW.
Where I live, the law would cover me if the situation i describe.
That's all there is to it. I would definitely not hire you for my lawyer, and i would definitely not be doing any jail time. This is what they call a "no bill"
God bless a free Texas and all the free people in it!
payphonebone 9 months ago
@Norwification You have genevese syndrome, you're suffering from the bystander effect.
I don't really care about your opinions on morals. I'm only arguing the LAW.
Where I live, the law would cover me if the situation i describe.
That's all there is to it. I would definitely not hire you for my lawyer, and i would definitely not be doing any jail time. This is what they call a "no bill"
God bless a free Texas and all the free people in it!
payphonebone 9 months ago
@payphonebone It's a case of imperfect-self defense. In other words, you think you need to act the way you do in order to protect yourself, but it isn't the reality of the situation.
In Texas, the only justified way of shooting a thief with stolen property (which this guy doesn't have) is to prove it is the only way to recover the property. If he is running away from you, Texas does not recognize it as self defense from bodily harm to kill him. It's manslaughter. It just is...
Norwification 9 months ago
@Norwification It's not manslaughter, it's using the authorized use of lethal force in the immediate pursuit of the commission of a violent felony.
payphonebone 9 months ago
@Norwification not true.. texas state statue pc9.32 you have the right to self defence from an Assault, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, attempted robbery or any thief commitment at night time and you CAN shoot a fleeing suspect in the back......look it up...........we love texas law
barstoolguru 8 months ago 2
@barstoolguru God bless Texas and Joe Horn...
DobermansRock 6 months ago
@barstoolguru im sorry..i believe that if some one is brave enough to rob you there brave enough to get every thing thats in store for them...but to shoot someone who is running away from a robbery is some pussy shit...BUT if the person did cause physical harm and fleeing by all means empty out your mag...i know it seem like im contradicting my self but shooting some one in the back is like kicking a retard in the balls
b5150b2012 6 months ago
@b5150b2012 pussy shit; what if he comes back and caps you ass? is that puss shit? you don't know what his Intentions are, the clirk is a sitting duck for when he comes back and maybe the second time don't want to leave any witnesses. is that pussy shit? by the way your medtifors suck or maybe you are the retard ?
barstoolguru 5 months ago
@b5150b2012
But you gotta look at it from tose who don't have that type of honor, there are people who would gladly shoot you in the back, and many in fact who prefer it, like the drive by shooting for example. You can't live life with this set of morals if your the only one who really respects them, it'll only end up hurting you in the end.
Scamceno 5 months ago
@b5150b2012 "i believe that if some one is brave enough to rob you there brave enough to get every thing thats in store for them" Sense when does it take bravery to commit the cowardly act of robbery. They do it because most clerks are told to give them what they want and not fight back.
tjsnaps 5 months ago
@tjsnaps oh i take it you want to argue the use of the word brave huh...its cool...be a dick about it...better yet look up the definition of the word and how it was use...then come back and make the same comment...
b5150b2012 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Norwification not true.. texas state statue pc9.32 you have the right to self defence from an Assault, assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, attempted robbery or any thief Committed at night time and you CAN shoot a fleeing suspect in the back......look it up...........we love texas law
barstoolguru 8 months ago
@payphonebone I'm not arguing my moral stance on the point, either. I'm only concerned with the law too, that's why I use words like "justified," they are part of the legal terminology. I'm sort of astonished you'd think I was arguing from an ethical standpoint - hardly what I've conveyed at all.
I also think it highly unprofessional to accuse me of bystander effect and also wrongly accuse me of a method of arguing I haven't utilized at all. I'm arguing the law - you're making claims about me.
Norwification 9 months ago
@Norwification The problem is that we obviously don't live under the same laws. In Texas where I live, I am a free person and can handle the situation in exactly the way i described and be covered under the terms of the law.
Just because it's different wherever you are doesn't make the way i handle the situation wrong.
It just makes your states laws assanine!
payphonebone 9 months ago
@payphonebone I'm saying your actions wouldn't be legal by Texas law either. If the thief had managed to steal anything- they would be, because it's reclaiming property. But he didn't, and your life is not in danger (by law) if you are chasing someone who has their back turned to you (back turned is a big deal in law).
It becomes a big deal if you kill someone, not if he's injured. But if you do kill him in pursuing him, you can be convicted of manslaughter. Fair? Maybe not. But it is the law.
Norwification 9 months ago
@Norwification you can still shoot a gun backwards while running ! no such thing as a back turned law here in Florida ! this guy tried to kill him ! I would have done the same thing only I don't miss !
eliedumas 6 months ago
@eliedumas "They call me Mr. Sharpshot!" Yeah, I can see how you'd want to shoot him, mate..
Norwification 6 months ago
Well I know not to trust you with a gun if a guy with a bomb is walking toward us backwards :P haha.
jmtcardinal 2 years ago 5
lol
zerosix1786 2 years ago 2
Threat was gone? How do you know? The nigger may be waiting outside or have armed accomplices waiting to bust in and kill you. You have to shoot to kill and get these scum off the streets. Do you want to pay $40K/year to support maggots like these in jail?
felicity5155 2 years ago 15
She did the world a favor by ridding us of one more violent retarded criminal ape. It wasn't murder, it was pest control.
MongoloidBabyUSA 2 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The clerks problem was chasing after the suspect.
Once the threat was gone, the encounter is over, and he should have called 911.
ROFLpwnedvideos 2 years ago
Thief got owned :)
rjport 2 years ago 9
If a crim has a gun and is running away, you should fire. A lot of robbers shoot over the shoulder while running away. Or, they could at any time stop, turn around and begin firing, sending bullets in your direction. If they are 200 ft out, they could still pose a lethal threat to you or anyone else in the area for that matter! Just because the criminal maniac seems to be leaving, does not mean that the danger is gone.
darklipstikgrrl 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hope that guy who shot at the criminal goes to jail. Just because you get robbed and beat up does not mean u have a right to kill
hope he rots in hell
thedarkallies 2 years ago
lol WRONG, the only reason you say that is because you yourself have never been the victim of a violent crime,
evilEKegg 2 years ago 8
or he is a criminal himself
GRIzzlyKB 2 years ago 3
One less thief on the streets. If you worked somewhere and somebody comes in and starts stomping you so they can get away with a couple hundred dollars they deserve to be shot, several times. However shooting out the door was not safe. You must always be sure of what you are shooting towards.
gREEnGuerillA420 2 years ago 13
I hope one day you are put in the same position. If it were me they would have been dead before they got over the counter...
TheonlyROXDOG 2 years ago 4
You're a moron thedarkallies! You have the right and the responsibility to defend yourself, your property, and your livelihood. That clerk should've killed the robber before the cops get the chance to arrest him because arresting and incarcerating criminals costs a lot of money. Bullets are cheap in comparison.
KlubMarcus 2 years ago 15
First problem I have is that the gun was "licensed". You don't need a license to exercise a RIGHT. Proof that this is a bad idea is evidenced by the fact that (supposedly) his "license" / 2nd Amendment RIGHT was "revoked" due to the fact that he attempted to defend himself. If someone threatens MY life, and I manage to get the upper hand, I'll shoot that fucker IN THE BACK as long as it's a continuation of the incident INITIATED by the perp. Why let the dirtbag live to pull the same shit again?
whitewolf60 2 years ago 4
Hey! I'm a democrat and strongly disagree with getting rid of second amendment rights or tampering with them in the slightest bit. I'm curious to know -- as a resident of PA, why did the clerk get his carry license taken away.. because he ran after the assailant?
cjbirk 2 years ago
The clerk's license was revoked for a completely separate incident.
HuskyKMA 2 years ago
how did he loose his gun liscense? thats cheap
1337blahred 2 years ago
"unprovoked brandishing of his weapon" that shit is serious. They emphasize that during the CCW class too.
demianxss 2 years ago
that means??? :) i think it means
using a weapon when not needed
1337blahred 2 years ago
not even :( if you so much as flash it in public, you could get in trouble. So if you want to show how cool your new glock 40 is to your buddy on the bus, side of street, restaurant etc. (I hate glocks btw) do it somewhere private.
demianxss 2 years ago
so you cant show it unless what?
1337blahred 2 years ago
"Unprovoked brandishing of his weapon" means he pulled his gun out for something stupid, like an argument with a neighbor or because a Jehova's witness came to his door. You can't pull a gun just to show people how bad you are.
warmitt 2 years ago
but he was robbing him :|
1337blahred 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the robber was running away, even in self defense, you shoot someone in the back, pray to god the jury is full of crackheads.
12GaugeLosAngeles 2 years ago
in certain states you have the my castle law... that states if you are in your place of work, car, or home and feel a justafiable threat to you life you can legal shoot an indavidual dead even if it is in the back.
dp665 2 years ago 14
depends on what state you live in, i know in TX and many others if they are on your property i.e. the jesus freaks woke you up at 7am on sunday if you have a no tresspassing sign up you can indeed pull a weapon on them and tell them to GTFO without fear of being prosicuted, unlike a number of other liberal ass states.
evilEKegg 2 years ago 6
Actually in PA you can Openly Carry your firearm. I Open Carry EVERYWHERE I GO as do tens of thousands of other pennsylvanians. It is 100% legal. No you cant unholster your weapon in public and show it to people, obviously you will get in trouble. However you DO NOT have to conceal carry in PA with your LTCF.
Its a License To Carry Firearms, NOT a concealed carry permit.
sandelpop 2 years ago
try me for anything and you'd need a gun, when i hopped counters, i didnt need a gun, just smack the fella FFS...
tyu198 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His friend is claiming, Richard Popalowski bought the gun because he "feared" President Obama was going to ban guns; well, loolie, lookie here, this is where ignorance become terminal. I hope he enjoys the future that Rush Limpballs & the crying psycho Glenn Beck. lead him too. Did they check to see if he had planned on attending a "tea party" on April 15th or if he had installed a doom room yet? FAUX news will get you every time. How many mass murderers have they minted so far?
AhTrini4U 2 years ago
Poplawski was just distressed because his gay lover Jiverly Wong had committed suicide the day before. Cut the guy some slack people.
miguelin97223 2 years ago
Merry Christmas!
fredscolnago 2 years ago
Fuckin A 412shane..... one less pos in the neigborhood.
arentanynamesleft 2 years ago
shoulda killed that motherfucker...
412shane0mack412 2 years ago
pause at 29..he was off by inches,.,. that woulda been a head shot for sure..
SHAGGYSNARF 2 years ago
good call.
odacir64 2 years ago
GO beat the robbery and arrest them then cal 911
dogmusher 2 years ago
right so four year old children that are killed in cross fire between a gang war aren't innocent? It's fuckers like you that need to be shot, if u wana kill each other fine do the world a favour but dont take others with you
cosmocreeper 2 years ago
now that bush is gone, USA is awesome.....when the fuckin zombies come, USA citizens are gonna live, canada might as well just bend over.. the government doesnt want us to have guns cause we might just get fed up with their oppression!
minorpayne23 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no the government dont want you to have guns becuase they give them to dumbasses like you that think zombies are gunna come to this world and ur are most likely to kill someone innocent with it
cosmocreeper 2 years ago
no one is innocent
WhooRah 2 years ago 3
zombies?
haydenfromsydney1989 2 years ago
I live in Canada. I HAVE TO GET A PERMIT TO TAKE MY GUN (a small 9mm) TO THE GUN RANGE, AND I NEED A PERMIT (takes forever) TO TRANSPORT MY GUN TO ANOTHER HOUSE, and if i stop to piss, i could lose my liscese and get in shit. GO AMERICA.
and did you know that theres less crime where theres more guns, what bergler is gonna bust into a house full of hicks? in CAnada our government penalizes the legal gun owners, even though the criminals dont liscense there guns,the CANADIAN GOVERNMENT areNAZIS
minorpayne23 3 years ago 10
It's cool to see a Canadian who has his head on straight! Once in awhile I talk to an Australian who believes in freedom too. Maybe it's time to leave the homeland; Freedom lovers welcome!
GL2330 2 years ago 8
way too go! Too bad he didnt get a clean shot b4 the criminal ran away.
Did any gun control or anti-gunners see what the the criminal did when the good guy had a gun?????
yes, guns save lives in the hands of good people, & by my estimates at least 80% of legal americans should fit that bill.
bottom line, give good people access to guns & crime as well as criminals drop.
ugotpimp 3 years ago 3