I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects.
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects.
I Really Like The Video From Your discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects
• Every claim by the IPCC's scientists has been tested using the scientific method by the world's experts in the respective fields and all the IPCCs claims have FAILED MISERABLY. None of the claims are even close to reality. To all reasonable people, the temperature record proves this every day. That should be the end of the scientific story. What is left? Just a political/green coalition who want to tell us all how to live-why should we do that?
Why such resistance? Because we have been lied to time and again. And let's be frank: BOTH sides of the debate have done this. Stop lying to the public, stop lying to other scientists, and restore faith in the scientific process.
A recurrent thread among the opposition blogs, not just anti-AGW but the anti-wind groups as well is a staggering amount of hatred and vitriol.You can easily get your comment posted if you start insulting the establishment; good luck if you try to inject some reasoned debate. There are opponents and then there are haters.
In the U.S. there is a continuing attack on objective reality by corporate forces and their right wing lackeys. At the heart of this is the fact that accurate descriptions of the world suggest courses of action that are in conflict with short-term profits.
These debates aren't really about science. They're about politics and profits.
50:20 this is a great point: if it weren't for all the common people demanding premature answers for unreasonable questions scientists wouldn't be typecast by the media.
@RagnarTheNerd - have you been a professional salesman? i've been a professional salesman for most of my life. it takes one to know one. santer is no salesman.
Fascinating lecture / speech. Maybe the F.I.A. should be amended when applying to the field of scientific research and discovery. Any individual or company contesting any data or conclusion should have to carry out a set, procedural non-partisan overview of the original data used before any counter claim or accusation can be made. Peer review of all procedures and methodology should be mandatory as each stage of the proceedings.
I Love The Video It Can Increase My Knowledge discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects.
indiage 2 weeks ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects.
kelekokerupuk 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Santer posits that this is a dangerous dilemma that will ultimately inhibit scientific research.
fitnesus 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video From Your discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects
lupabuatchannel 3 weeks ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing discusses the recent problems with the use of the freedom of information act for non-US citizens to demand complete records, including emails, on scientific research projects
willamricard 3 weeks ago
Why such resistance? Are you kidding?
• Every claim by the IPCC's scientists has been tested using the scientific method by the world's experts in the respective fields and all the IPCCs claims have FAILED MISERABLY. None of the claims are even close to reality. To all reasonable people, the temperature record proves this every day. That should be the end of the scientific story. What is left? Just a political/green coalition who want to tell us all how to live-why should we do that?
1000frolly 1 month ago
@phreakyprofessor Idiot
MoncktonBunkum 3 months ago
i dont understand
grunder20 3 months ago
Very nice video presentation. Two thumbs up.
agapitoflores001 3 months ago
Why such resistance? Because we have been lied to time and again. And let's be frank: BOTH sides of the debate have done this. Stop lying to the public, stop lying to other scientists, and restore faith in the scientific process.
phreakyprofessor 8 months ago
A recurrent thread among the opposition blogs, not just anti-AGW but the anti-wind groups as well is a staggering amount of hatred and vitriol.You can easily get your comment posted if you start insulting the establishment; good luck if you try to inject some reasoned debate. There are opponents and then there are haters.
bannor99 1 year ago
Inhofe is a terrorist and needs to be prosecuted for criminal interference with government work. Execute him.
deskset24 1 year ago 4
In the U.S. there is a continuing attack on objective reality by corporate forces and their right wing lackeys. At the heart of this is the fact that accurate descriptions of the world suggest courses of action that are in conflict with short-term profits.
These debates aren't really about science. They're about politics and profits.
Pangolinx1 1 year ago 13
50:20 this is a great point: if it weren't for all the common people demanding premature answers for unreasonable questions scientists wouldn't be typecast by the media.
BADSYNE 1 year ago
Those who still think there are "two sides" to the global warming debate should see this video. It is an eye opener!
TheSlowThinker 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This Santer guy talks and acts like a professional salesman.
RagnarTheNerd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RagnarTheNerd
A a professional salesman who talked like that would starve to death. He sounds like my Organic Chem. professor.
n9387d 1 year ago 2
@RagnarTheNerd Santer a salesman? Give me a break. He's the quintessential science nerd.
robhoneycutt 1 year ago 12
@RagnarTheNerd - have you been a professional salesman? i've been a professional salesman for most of my life. it takes one to know one. santer is no salesman.
mwhearn1 1 year ago 3
Fascinating lecture / speech. Maybe the F.I.A. should be amended when applying to the field of scientific research and discovery. Any individual or company contesting any data or conclusion should have to carry out a set, procedural non-partisan overview of the original data used before any counter claim or accusation can be made. Peer review of all procedures and methodology should be mandatory as each stage of the proceedings.
Good luck with your fight.
speedmatters 1 year ago 3
'scientific cleansing'? Lol...
siasabora 1 year ago
Outrage.
metalorg 1 year ago