I think this disk would date to around 1908 or so - clues: check the banner on the label for the exposition dates, and also Madame Butterfly wasn't premiered until 1904. Nice performance!
blackpool, the Columbia Viva-Tonals weren't surfaced with shellac. They were a combo of plaster and shellac for the core, covered with onionskin paper, with a thin layer of celluloid on the outside (like Amberol cylinders), giving a much smoother and quieter surface with a more durable core. That's why we (thankfully) have so many of them left today.
I use the 'Magix Audio Cleaning Lab 12 Deluxe' system for removing unwanted noise and adding tonal quality to my fairly large "78's" collection, before transfering them to 'CD'
If this is done with great care, the results can be quite impressive.
Please note:- I have no financial or other interests in 'Magix' Company and believe there are other equally good products that do the same job as mentioned, on the market.
About processing.... Well I look at it this way, it wasn't recorded with 'crackles & plops' these are purely generated from impurities in the shellac. Some of the 'budget' labels were particularly bad in this respect. Black labelled Columbia records had very refined high quality shellac surfaces and, when new, were all most silent (they were also laminated). So I think any system that can reduce unwanted noise with little or no effect to the actual recording, must be a very positive step forward
=D I have an Brunswick Phonograph like yours!!!. These recordplayer are dated from 1925. I had since I was 14 years old, and I buy this with no string (therefore, the cost was so cheap) but even so I like my first old phonograph!... (^_^)
This aria is called "Un bel di vedremo." I have a couple of those real old Columbia "Ribbon" records (even posted 2 Barbara Maurel videos) and the sound is very good. Those were apparently some of the best records that could be bought in those days.
I think this disk would date to around 1908 or so - clues: check the banner on the label for the exposition dates, and also Madame Butterfly wasn't premiered until 1904. Nice performance!
hammondmania 1 year ago
@hammondmania Discographies list as second half of 1910
beautman1 1 year ago
many thanks
ORTIZ304 1 year ago
I use W.D. 40 on the record if I am going to copy it.
TheJECAT 1 year ago
Are you using a stylus made for 78rpm groove spacing?
1926VictorCredenza 2 years ago
blackpool, the Columbia Viva-Tonals weren't surfaced with shellac. They were a combo of plaster and shellac for the core, covered with onionskin paper, with a thin layer of celluloid on the outside (like Amberol cylinders), giving a much smoother and quieter surface with a more durable core. That's why we (thankfully) have so many of them left today.
esroberto1 2 years ago
Keep up the good work. also a a Mac lover. Thanks
roskruge 2 years ago
I use the 'Magix Audio Cleaning Lab 12 Deluxe' system for removing unwanted noise and adding tonal quality to my fairly large "78's" collection, before transfering them to 'CD'
If this is done with great care, the results can be quite impressive.
Please note:- I have no financial or other interests in 'Magix' Company and believe there are other equally good products that do the same job as mentioned, on the market.
blackpoolbarmpot 3 years ago
About processing.... Well I look at it this way, it wasn't recorded with 'crackles & plops' these are purely generated from impurities in the shellac. Some of the 'budget' labels were particularly bad in this respect. Black labelled Columbia records had very refined high quality shellac surfaces and, when new, were all most silent (they were also laminated). So I think any system that can reduce unwanted noise with little or no effect to the actual recording, must be a very positive step forward
blackpoolbarmpot 3 years ago
you are aware that you remove all the "life" from the sound when you process the records like this....
me, personaly I like the Hiss and pops....
bugsycline 3 years ago
The composer/artist did not write the noises you love into his compositions. You simply have poor taste in audio sound quality.
4925pine 2 years ago 3
this 78 really went for 6 mins? wow
NESHero 3 years ago
=D I have an Brunswick Phonograph like yours!!!. These recordplayer are dated from 1925. I had since I was 14 years old, and I buy this with no string (therefore, the cost was so cheap) but even so I like my first old phonograph!... (^_^)
osdelced 3 years ago
This aria is called "Un bel di vedremo." I have a couple of those real old Columbia "Ribbon" records (even posted 2 Barbara Maurel videos) and the sound is very good. Those were apparently some of the best records that could be bought in those days.
VinylToVideo 4 years ago 2