Added: 1 year ago
From: iknowwhatiswrong
Views: 1,588
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Just the type of farcical propaganda we've come to expect from the Ambassador Bridge.

  • a new bylaw is needed in Windsor...

    "one the prohibits blight caused to remain in the path of progress"

    maybe the billionaires would think twice before they try to blockbust to save money...

  • Tear them down and then what? Congrats on blocks of empty ghost lots.

  • Way to go with this video! I went to the University in the 1990s. I'm in shock at what has happened to that neighbourhood. The homes were beautiful then but boarded up homes only bring crime. If the neighbourhood can't be restored, then the only alternative is to tear the homes down. Get rid of the unsafe conditions and tear them down now.

  • Is the "helpless" the hymn speaks about the Ambassador Bridge Company???

  • Comment removed

  • 2/ Now he's demanding that the Bridge Company be allowed to tear down 110 or so houses WITHOUT formal proposals, just because the Bridge Company has made itself such a nuisance in the neighborhood. "This is not about the Bridge", his cohort Hilary Payne has constantly stated.

    What planet are these people from???

  • 1/ Mr. Flood sells several rental properties to the Bridge Company.

    He asks for the city's permission to tear down a perfectly good house on the corner of Donnelly and Indian that he owns.

    He complies with the city's requirements about formally stating his intentions as to what he wants to do with the land.

    He builds a huge mega-rental with the city's (and therefore the neighbours) blessing.....

  • Great production values... lousy message.

  • This is about the bridge. The bridge company is up to something, we all know that.

  • Tearing down these derelict homes is a necessity, for the betterment of all no matter what the land is used for in the future. The city shouldn't prevent the demolition or eventual greenspace that has been proposed in the interim of the bridge controversy. Land on both sides of the border, held by both our governments and the buffoon are held hostage while the cards are dealt. Our democracies have allowed and propogated such inactions for decades and shall continue to with corporate influence.

  • I agree with tearing down these homes..I dont know what the next logical step will be, possibly much needed student housing for the University of Windsor or possibly new housing for residents, a shopping mall strip or even a greenway park for the current residents? But for now, as evidenced by the graffiti, broken bottle's and needles lying around, this area has become a breeeding ground for people with bad intentions and must be cleaned up..

  • Tearing down these homes is NOT THE RIGHT ANSWER. We do not need immediate prosperity but LONG TERM success. Mr. Francis is a zealot and I agree he is doing next to nothing to help our great city, but demolition won't solve anything. Does Mr. Flood support the twin expansion that is supposed to destroy that neighbourhood? Because that is an equally blind step toward a sad Windsor.

  • Sad times in Windsor for sure, there is no denying that. We can collectivly change our city's direction if everyone got out to vote in this municiple election. The Edgar regime has done much damage and it's time to getting back to being a productive and pro-active community.

  • Great video showing what happens when Eddie doesn't care about our city.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more