Yo I'm a wiki user and don't approve of this. But I have to ask a question why do you faggots even vandalise wiki. I really don't see the point in it. Is it to get users reactions?
So, why are we celebrating the anniversary of the first virus ever created? (Says so in the beginning of the video). Virus writers/spreaders are worthless predators who deserve to die alone, cut to gory chunks and marinating in their own post-mortem bile. They should get bent, get eviscerated alive and strung up like a dead pig for the world to see.
I congratulate you, however this was nothing. Please see the contributions by users such as JarlaxleArtemis, Roitr, Grawp, Willy on Wheels, Wikipedia is Communism, ClaimJumperPete, Bambifan101, and their over 9000 sockpuppets. They are members of our ranks, and they are the true vandals of Wikipedia. You made one small change that was easily reverted. We have vandalized thousands of articles repeatedly, made painful page moves, and used many sockpuppets to evade blocks.
(con't) We are the ones who have spurned the installment of numerous editing restrictions by spreading butthurt among the administrators. We are the real trolls destroying Wikipedia. We do it for the lulz. Why do it for anything else? Our library that documents our wonderfully evil deeds is Encyclopedia Dramatica. Soon, Wikipedia will be but an arm of the lulz empire that is taking over the Internet. Expect us.
@vladthehawk09 This isn't funny because he caused no drama, as the vandalism was small and easily reverted. If you want to see vandalism that is very funny, go to Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse/JarlaxleArtemis or Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse/Bambifan101. These pages document users like us, who vandalize Wikipedia repeatedly and use over 9000 alternate accounts to carry on the disruption for over five years. This has caused many users to leave Wikipedia, exactly our evil goal.
@wiltbloococo Yes, this guy wasted his own time, because his vandalism was simple and one-shot. We, however, waste the administrators' time, as we come back and vandalize time and time again, using over 9000 sockpuppets and open proxies and causing painful page moves. We carry this on for five or six years, causing many headaches on the Wiki. See Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse for examples.
Vandals will be vandals, and as long as this is the "free encyclopedia" that will always be the case. If you wanted to rid the site of vandals, you could ban IP editing and require heavy checks before being admitted as a user, but that goes against the wiki's philosophy. If readers knew more about how the wiki works, they could even revert vandalism on their own, if they see something stupid in the article, just check the history and fix. Then admin's jobs are easier.
@piman314159265358979 True, however, that would not work against long-term abusers such as us. A simple revert wouldn't last for long, as we have over 9000 sockpuppets and sleeper accounts, supported by open proxies and zombie computers, with which to cause many headaches on the world's biggest encyclopedia.
dude don't edit youtube! edit the entry for wikipedia and delete the whole intro, put in big letters saying PENIS, and then link it to some random entry. lol
Vandalism can be funny to read at times, but it's disruptive, and it can get those responsible in a lot of trouble. It's all fun and games until somebody has your internet taken out. I find it amuzing to create chaos for cheerleaders (I have nothing against cheerleaders, I just think it's funny), Charlotte Tarpons (rival school), LBHS Manta Rays (rival school), and liberals/democrats who are vandals. I can imagine the look on their faces when they lose their internet service. :P
People who vandalize Wikipedia have no life and are begging some random person to get their IP and report it. Most ISPs don't find the abuse funny and will turn your service off if they find out about it(ask LBHS Cheerleader who vandalized from Embarq DSL from 2006-2008). There is a rumor that Wikipedia doesn't report to ISPs unless they're blocked five times, but that's not true; anybody can go into the history tab of any article and report every IP vandal they see.
Wikipedia vandalism can be hilarious to read, but probably not so fun for others to have to revert back and forth. I have to admit that I've vandalized it before when I was really bored, though.
Anybody can edit wikipedia, so dumb people dump crap there, so we need to dump so much crap there that you will lock all the articles so nobody will put crap on them any more. Them wikipedia will finally be reliable. So if you love wikipedia please vandalise it.
well, I like to revert vandalism. However, I don't consider vandalism as a hobby, as this affects articles from the encyclopedia. Please don't vandalize Wikipedia.
Sorry, but that is not funny. Please do not vandalize Wikipedia articles, as hundreds of editors have to constantly revert vandalism like this. - Chetblong (Administrator on Wikipedia)
I find reverting vandalism fun. But seeing it is not. Sometimes I can get a good laugh or two with it, but it's serious. Real vandals, real editors, real readers who criticize Wikipedia for seeing vandalism. Not a good thing. I have a user by my name on Wikipedia.
You are sad and pathetic. Instead of investing your time in making a constructive contribution to humanity, you prefer to destruct other people's work. And then make a video about it like it's something cool to brag about.
I've seen a similar intellectual level... on a rock. You are nothing but a waste of Earth's natural resources.
Listen you little cunt, I'm an admin on wiki and any vandalism can be reverted instantly, as we have special tools that record recent changes. By the way you little cunt, Wiki can trace your i.p address, they do it so other members know when they warn someone for vandalism if it is a private I.p or a shared one. Well done on posting this on youtube, as Im going to file a report, and get wiki to ask for your details so they can contact your parents/school.
do you spend all your time "vandalizing" (what kind of word is that?) wikipedia? what a waste of time... find something else to do, go outside or something
and even more use wikipedia on occasion to find information. Vandalizing wikipedia, uncyclopedia, or any other wiki is a pointless waste of time for both you and whoever has to clean up after you. Vandalizing wikis is quite pathetic. Why not put your time towards writing some new articles or doing something constructive?
i'm blocked indefinitely
phanuruch8555 4 months ago 2
@phanuruch8555 same here
jrussellawesome 3 months ago
Are you (sorry) stupid?
aqaqwaaa 4 months ago
there should be a Wikipedia port where you can edit and not get in trouble because it'd be intended to be humorous
jrussellawesome 6 months ago
@jrussellawesome that's called Wikipedia Sandbox. Look it up.
asterick6 3 months ago
i dont believe this video... youtube also one of the unreliable sources on internet...
ImperialEarthEmpire 9 months ago
If anymore people decide to go against chetblong then they've got nothing to do but to criticize while chetblong is making wikipedia better.
Guitarist500 10 months ago
dan, chill dude. At least show some respect to authority when it shows up.
Thorovain 10 months ago
Yo I'm a wiki user and don't approve of this. But I have to ask a question why do you faggots even vandalise wiki. I really don't see the point in it. Is it to get users reactions?
BlackhawksRBallin 1 year ago
@BlackhawksRBallin Because its humorous,if you can't see any humor in vandalizing wikipedia and other wikis you have no life!
deividas56 9 months ago
@deividas56 so life is actually about making fun of others... interesting...
ImperialEarthEmpire 9 months ago
So, why are we celebrating the anniversary of the first virus ever created? (Says so in the beginning of the video). Virus writers/spreaders are worthless predators who deserve to die alone, cut to gory chunks and marinating in their own post-mortem bile. They should get bent, get eviscerated alive and strung up like a dead pig for the world to see.
reaperman2010 1 year ago
I would like to flag this video as inappropratie but I cannot select the right reason.
Myrtone 1 year ago
this is so cool, precisely because so many douchebags are angry because you did this! please keep vandalizing!!!1
iaysen 1 year ago
@iaysen Exactly.
HardcoreGamer4Ever 1 year ago
@iaysen I mean, they deserve it if they expect accurate information from any Wiki.
HardcoreGamer4Ever 1 year ago
@iaysen do you have a conscience? or a brain?
sp33dyphil 1 year ago
@sp33dyphil you don't see any humor in this?
iaysen 1 year ago
Comment removed
WonderN123 1 year ago
I hate Vandalism!
WonderN123 1 year ago 2
@WonderN123 I agree :(
sp33dyphil 1 year ago
NOT FUNNY! 0/5!
WonderN123 1 year ago
It would be good if you advertised your account.
DanielMedcalf 1 year ago
shit video. i want 30 seconds of my life back
ciarogciarogeile 1 year ago
I congratulate you, however this was nothing. Please see the contributions by users such as JarlaxleArtemis, Roitr, Grawp, Willy on Wheels, Wikipedia is Communism, ClaimJumperPete, Bambifan101, and their over 9000 sockpuppets. They are members of our ranks, and they are the true vandals of Wikipedia. You made one small change that was easily reverted. We have vandalized thousands of articles repeatedly, made painful page moves, and used many sockpuppets to evade blocks.
EpicWikiTroll 1 year ago
(con't) We are the ones who have spurned the installment of numerous editing restrictions by spreading butthurt among the administrators. We are the real trolls destroying Wikipedia. We do it for the lulz. Why do it for anything else? Our library that documents our wonderfully evil deeds is Encyclopedia Dramatica. Soon, Wikipedia will be but an arm of the lulz empire that is taking over the Internet. Expect us.
EpicWikiTroll 1 year ago
Your Gaytarded this isnt funny dont vandalize wikipedia i might edit articles but i put extra info on it no vadalism like this
vladthehawk09 1 year ago
@vladthehawk09 This isn't funny because he caused no drama, as the vandalism was small and easily reverted. If you want to see vandalism that is very funny, go to Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse/JarlaxleArtemis or Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse/Bambifan101. These pages document users like us, who vandalize Wikipedia repeatedly and use over 9000 alternate accounts to carry on the disruption for over five years. This has caused many users to leave Wikipedia, exactly our evil goal.
EpicWikiTroll 1 year ago
So you took a couple of minutes and vandalised the page 'YouTube'? That's a waste of time, they probably reverted that with a click of a button.
wiltbloococo 1 year ago
@wiltbloococo Yes, this guy wasted his own time, because his vandalism was simple and one-shot. We, however, waste the administrators' time, as we come back and vandalize time and time again, using over 9000 sockpuppets and open proxies and causing painful page moves. We carry this on for five or six years, causing many headaches on the Wiki. See Wikipedia:Long-Term Abuse for examples.
EpicWikiTroll 1 year ago
Vandals will be vandals, and as long as this is the "free encyclopedia" that will always be the case. If you wanted to rid the site of vandals, you could ban IP editing and require heavy checks before being admitted as a user, but that goes against the wiki's philosophy. If readers knew more about how the wiki works, they could even revert vandalism on their own, if they see something stupid in the article, just check the history and fix. Then admin's jobs are easier.
piman314159265358979 2 years ago
@piman314159265358979 True, however, that would not work against long-term abusers such as us. A simple revert wouldn't last for long, as we have over 9000 sockpuppets and sleeper accounts, supported by open proxies and zombie computers, with which to cause many headaches on the world's biggest encyclopedia.
EpicWikiTroll 1 year ago
I have been working on Wikipedia for almost 2 years, and to all you vandals: FUCK YOU! You have no idea how much work we put into it.
warpedcomedy 2 years ago
@warpedcomedy
BLAH BLAH BLAH
SuperResound 1 year ago
Do this type of stuff on Uncyclopedia. That stuff is a lot funnier on there.
DJMixerrTube 2 years ago
idiot!
EvanJuggle 2 years ago
Useless --_--
I can't see sh!t
pashaahsj 2 years ago
dude don't edit youtube! edit the entry for wikipedia and delete the whole intro, put in big letters saying PENIS, and then link it to some random entry. lol
dazzitboy 2 years ago
Vandalism can be funny to read at times, but it's disruptive, and it can get those responsible in a lot of trouble. It's all fun and games until somebody has your internet taken out. I find it amuzing to create chaos for cheerleaders (I have nothing against cheerleaders, I just think it's funny), Charlotte Tarpons (rival school), LBHS Manta Rays (rival school), and liberals/democrats who are vandals. I can imagine the look on their faces when they lose their internet service. :P
bnefriends 2 years ago
It is true. Same here.
DJMixerrTube 2 years ago
I love people who add funny content to the site that's vandalism! xD
RaymanRhyanna2190 2 years ago
You're a baaad boy.
Coastergeekperson04 2 years ago
People who vandalize Wikipedia have no life and are begging some random person to get their IP and report it. Most ISPs don't find the abuse funny and will turn your service off if they find out about it(ask LBHS Cheerleader who vandalized from Embarq DSL from 2006-2008). There is a rumor that Wikipedia doesn't report to ISPs unless they're blocked five times, but that's not true; anybody can go into the history tab of any article and report every IP vandal they see.
bnefriends 2 years ago 4
@bnefriends It's quite funny,if you want facts,crack a book;remember that thing you used before typing shit.
randomguy983 4 days ago
Wikipedia vandalism can be hilarious to read, but probably not so fun for others to have to revert back and forth. I have to admit that I've vandalized it before when I was really bored, though.
sciencegenius123 2 years ago 6
I actually really enjoy reverting vandalism and trolling on Wikipedia. I've also done some of both myself.
barichm0 2 years ago
:P not funny.
pianokid54 2 years ago
LOL
redgar2011 3 years ago
I liked it when Wikipedia put up a hall of fame of vandals in the past. If you vandalised alot of pages, you became famous on Wikipedia!
Jonhny2 3 years ago
Willy on Wheels and The Communism Vandal. I remember those two pretty well!
Jonhny2 3 years ago 2
nice job
kirbyman1kanden7pf 3 years ago
Cmon, vandalising Wikipedia articles is fun! I miss the days when it was easier to vandalise Wikipedia articles.
Jonhny2 3 years ago
I feel your pain. They blacklisted Goatse Tables :(
MC0Mijado 3 years ago
Grawp spam = ftl
You know that it can take less than a second to revert your vandalism with applications, right?
Mortal0121 3 years ago
Meant as a reply for MC0, doesn't look like it went where it was supposed to.
Mortal0121 3 years ago
yeah right, as if that would stop us...
Anybody can edit wikipedia, so dumb people dump crap there, so we need to dump so much crap there that you will lock all the articles so nobody will put crap on them any more. Them wikipedia will finally be reliable. So if you love wikipedia please vandalise it.
MC0Mijado 3 years ago
Grawp refers to his Wikipedia vandalism -- which he has been doing for years with literally thousands of accounts -- as "epic vandalism".
barichm0 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing.
DJMixerrTube 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck you n00b!
Haggerstemplates 3 years ago
Gotta love fucking with wikinerds
SevenStringSoldier 3 years ago
enit!
rrtransformers 3 years ago
well, I like to revert vandalism. However, I don't consider vandalism as a hobby, as this affects articles from the encyclopedia. Please don't vandalize Wikipedia.
robinsonsmay 3 years ago 3
so....
Noobssuckass935 3 years ago
this is like my vid bt mine is more positive
namfl 3 years ago
Sorry, but that is not funny. Please do not vandalize Wikipedia articles, as hundreds of editors have to constantly revert vandalism like this. - Chetblong (Administrator on Wikipedia)
Chetblong 3 years ago 27
I find reverting vandalism fun. But seeing it is not. Sometimes I can get a good laugh or two with it, but it's serious. Real vandals, real editors, real readers who criticize Wikipedia for seeing vandalism. Not a good thing. I have a user by my name on Wikipedia.
Coastergeekperson04 3 years ago 2
i'd really like to see Jimbo revert vandalism along with his helpers. After all, he's a wikipedian, just like you.
Raffaello9 3 years ago
@Chetblong :D
stickmedia1 1 year ago
@Chetblong Lol sup fellow Wikipedian?
BlackhawksRBallin 1 year ago
@Chetblong do you just search the internet for people who edit wiki pages?
ZacharyHere 1 year ago 2
@Chetblong more like -Chetblong, wiki nerd with no life who needs to get laid
H1TMANactual 1 year ago
@Chetblong Shut the fuck up.
randomguy983 1 year ago
@Chetblong you suck
Teeheehee093 1 year ago
@Chetblong Wikipedia is serious business. lol. get out.
flipperwhipper 11 months ago
@flipperwhipper microsoft is a serious business... lol, get out...
ImperialEarthEmpire 9 months ago
@Chetblong Why do you guys bother fixing Wikipedia? don't you have anything better to do?
dantherocker1 11 months ago
@dantherocker1 you might need some more brains to understand.
Guitarist500 10 months ago
@dantherocker1 do you have anything better to do?
ImperialEarthEmpire 9 months ago
@Chetblong it is funny you noob
and dont show off that ur a admin
edwintanjunhong 7 months ago
you fail utterly and supremely
dasrik 4 years ago
Seems like a waste of time to make a video about this. Anyone with a finger and enough brains to use it can vandalize Wikipedia.
It also doesn't seem very smart to use you're own account like that.
clpo13 4 years ago 13
Ha, I meant "your own account." I win at grammar...
clpo13 4 years ago
you can't even see what you're typing
besides it would be far better if wikipedia didnt undo vandalism like straight away
mrchief268 4 years ago
I am a vandal hunter, and we will have you.
WikipedianMarlith 4 years ago
Hey can you the HTML code for that?
Sparisi1122 4 years ago
You are sad and pathetic. Instead of investing your time in making a constructive contribution to humanity, you prefer to destruct other people's work. And then make a video about it like it's something cool to brag about.
I've seen a similar intellectual level... on a rock. You are nothing but a waste of Earth's natural resources.
w2bhc 4 years ago 3
But then again, what can anyone expect from a person that uses Internet Explorer 7...
w2bhc 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sometimes I reply to my own comments because I think people care too ;-;
armadilloHD 4 years ago
lol, explorer 7
Sparisi1122 4 years ago
do a search for "porchesia" and "nihilartikel" to see how "smart vandalism" can be problematic in the long shot.
Raffaello9 4 years ago
"Nihilartikel" redirects to a real article now, so try "Frostwave", "The Three Bishes", or "HAGGER?". They are better examples.
randomjunk52 4 years ago
I vandalize wiki too.only a bunch of douches (AKA wiki admins) stick up for the site.
Kodachrome945 4 years ago
Listen you little cunt, I'm an admin on wiki and any vandalism can be reverted instantly, as we have special tools that record recent changes. By the way you little cunt, Wiki can trace your i.p address, they do it so other members know when they warn someone for vandalism if it is a private I.p or a shared one. Well done on posting this on youtube, as Im going to file a report, and get wiki to ask for your details so they can contact your parents/school.
kc1876 4 years ago 2
fuck you kc1876 you are a faggot and a worthless shit.
Kodachrome945 4 years ago
Correction:
"fuck you Kodachrome945 you are a faggot and a worthless shit."
Coastergeekperson04 2 years ago
do you spend all your time "vandalizing" (what kind of word is that?) wikipedia? what a waste of time... find something else to do, go outside or something
cvu91 4 years ago
and even more use wikipedia on occasion to find information. Vandalizing wikipedia, uncyclopedia, or any other wiki is a pointless waste of time for both you and whoever has to clean up after you. Vandalizing wikis is quite pathetic. Why not put your time towards writing some new articles or doing something constructive?
Starater 4 years ago 2
Why the hell do you use Internet Explorer??!!!?!!?!!!
myguineapig 4 years ago
Its the biggest online wiki there is. Of course it would be on it.
Starater 4 years ago 2
You suck. You have nothing to do but to destroy peoples work. Again, you suck.
Starater 4 years ago 2
if their work was important it wouldnt have been on wiki
evilresurected 4 years ago