Added: 1 year ago
From: chotaboy66
Views: 17,991
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (358)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One on becoming a Republic, but not your  carbon tax.

  • This clip is simple but its message is deep and it might make you think. Or not. Either way take care of yourself

    /watch?v=s_VSRH5_KJ4&feature=c­hannel_video_title

    

  • WTF i did'nt even hear anybody say i or no?

  • Bob Brown and Kiss My ass you wanker!

  • WTF! Bob down and kiss my ass! you NWO bigot!

  • Brown is a piece of shit, along with Gillard and Rudd.

  • Wow! 63 dislikes… 63 people liked having there constitutional rights taken from them? Or they just don’t have a fucking clue what just happened in this vid?

    Better wake up Aussie…

  • @i8uNWO Its only evidence we have 63 individuals on youtube who are their own worst enemy ? ,which isn't bad considering out of 17 thousand odd now have the seed planted whether they like it or not ,39 of which admit they have the seed & its growing:) I'm not fussed really because this video & many others I have done are only vindication considering the amount of attacks I got when they first went up . All I can say is here is the evidence & I told you all so, but you mocked me all the same.

  • im all for losing the Monachy but not with the grens in im not

  • @elvinsmatthew You can't leave the Monarchy without putting your self under the Pope. So take your pick, under the wings of the Monarch, or under the reign oft he Pope.

  • @PeekyBooo I cant leave the Monarchy without a fully transparent referendum ? At least currently under the constitution we have the last say , however a plebiscite wont be transparent rather your vote will be a simple yes or no at first & in a second plebiscite you will be given a illusionary choice of 2 republic models that will remove more of our liberties either way & remove the constitution & what we have in sec128 where the people currently hold the balance of power. We cant ignore this?

  • @chotaboy66 I understand the problems. A plebiscite is a Roman show of hands and has been carried out by the likes of Napoleon to give the illusion of a popular vote.

    Bob Brown as you know is a Communist Pervert, so you expect him to do everything that is detrimental to Australia and its purity.

  • @PeekyBooo No doubt , they the banking corporations have something on bob that they hold over him. Currently only those who go to the top of the political chain are hiding some dark twisted secret, thats how they keep these political parasites in check who are continually selling out not only their own family but all the good honest hardworking men, women & foremost the innocent children of Australia. Animals have better scruples than these political parasites acting in evasion thats for sure.

  • Why the hell are the politicians keen on a republic? Past examples should show the interest is for their own benefit or that of corporations. The people will decide when they want the name "republic" & using the constitution with precedents set by common law we will decide how to live in that republic

  • @topgunexcel Why the hell are the politicians keen on a republic?

    --

    Thats easy to cover up their crimes of treason only If its done by referendum it will expose them all really ,thats why brown here is trying to pull this plebiscite trick that would allow then to bypass the procedures of a fully transparent referendum . Its not rocket science they're all crooks trying to cover up their crimes . Its only a matter of time now.

  • @topgunexcel Thats why they want to use a plebiscite because a plebiscite doesn't put everything on the table before we vote where the referendum dose . If they used a referendum it would expose everyone sitting in Parliament for treason. Any plebiscite is evidence they have something to hide which is no longer hidden really , they are just counting on the ignorance of the average Aussie to vote for a non transparent republic which will cover up their treason & remove more of our liberties.

  • The greens are hardly going to define and improve freedoms for us we will be lobotomised for eating meat!

    I see the sense in having our own head of stare but the people pushing for it are not to be trusted so i hope it stays the same for a generation or two.

    Australia is already gone, i can hear its demise outside my door as i type.

  • As far as i'm concerned i am a citizen of The Commonwealth of Australia.

    If this already voted down issue comes up and passes then people who want Australia to remian the same will have to decide whether or not to participate in the new australian order. ( "Oceanic Zone 1 of the Global Council"may be an appropriate name).

    What is wrong with our constitution? What good is a bill of rights when it can be ammended or ignored.

    The greens are hardly going to define and improve freedoms for us we wi

  • fuck bob brown!

  • @DamianFinch Q1: Why arn't we a republic with a bill of rights yet?

    Q2: Do you think we should become a republic?

    Just after your personal opinion.

  • @brendanraymond A1; Because we are both, a monarchist defacto Fabian fascist republic by stealth with no bill of rights.

    A2: Only if we have an open transparent referendum where all the cards are on the table first before we vote but this will never happen because it will expose A1 :)

  • Re the below, what is going on with the tube these days. ""@chotaboy66""

  • Deliberately poorly worded I presume. Such a society is exactly what we live in at the present moment in time, but nonetheless it has gone through (slow?) process of evolution since Roman times

  • People should see that significant moves can be made within modern politics in developed western society. Police should be concerned, but the Legislative should be only mildly bemused.

  • @cliptwingz A society of an individual who robs another of the productivity of his effort or enslaves him or attempts to limit the freedom of his mind or compels him to act against his own rational judgment is not a society but a mob held together by institutionalized gang rule, such a society destroys the values of all human co existence ,has no possible justification & represents not a source of benefits but the deadliest threat to mans survival which is the removal of individual rights.

  • In order to fix the boat people problem a start would be to get rid of United Nations the army that creates instability & war as its the New World Order Army of death & destruction. After all they murdered much of Haiti's adult population. Go google free view documentaries & watch movies to get educated on the world Global Elite Government takeover by the ritchest of the ritch the billionairs/trillionairs club of scumbags to create an enslaved prison planet.

  • Comment removed

  • Fuck Browns a deadset turd

  • 1. Patriotism is the last refuge of a Scoundrel - Samuel Johnson. 2. Um, all your precious rights don't technically exist, they are all at the mercy of power hungry wankers in all those seats in all the Parliament Houses in all the world. 3. If you think socialism is communism, you are clearly a greedy idiot who was brain-washed successfully by those McCarthy-ists. Nothing wrong with socialism combined with capitalism, eg, Norway, Finland, Sweden.

  • What did he just do to commit treason?

  • @bushpigification Read section 44 of the Australian constitution , adhering to a foreign power ? His actions are a result of others & quite possibly himself adhering to foreign powers , anyone that conceals treason is an act of treason & the plebiscite he is introducing is clearly an attempt to conceal treason for a referendum would expose treason by demonstrating the implications to us by the many purposed omissions of public referendums in the past . Read more info under the video?

  • @chotaboy66: s 44 (i) just means 1. citizens of other countries need to give up their citizenship before becoming an MP; and 2. substitute the decisions of a foreign power for that of their own.

    (ii) would require a treason conviction. This would be impossible to sustain in court on the basis of what appears in this video, since parliamentary actions are non-justiciable.

  • @Bertrandization  Sorry Sec 44 Any person who Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance,

    obedience, or adherence to a foreign power,?

    Julia Gillard has been (ii) Is attainted of treason therefor shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting House of Reps., Julia Gillard did not swore the correct oath of allegiance when she was sworn in . Sadly everyone sitting in Parliament are sitting in treason for they conceal treason & brown is trying to cover it all up with a phony plebiscite .

  • @Bertrandization then why does is it say clearly in section 44 ''or is entitled to the privilages of a foriegn power'' meaning gillard and abbott can get entitlments and live in the UK because they were born there and australians that cant are allowed to sit ,,remember the most important bit " or is entitled to '' it clearly means if you are a citizen here but have some where to run you dont get to sit ever

  • @chotaboy66 So Queen Elizabeth isn't a foreign power to you? Goodness gracious me. The plebiscite is to determine whether or not there should be a republic. Then the referendum comes on what the actual change to head of state formation should be. Of course other changes to the constitution can be voted on also.

  • @fishardansin I don't believe I said queen Elisabeth is a foreign power ?

    Please I have discussed this too many times to remember now , read the comments on this video & maybe read whats under the video in show more. The plebiscite is a trick , why not use a advisory referendum? There are already provisions in law for a transparent referendum NOW, not any non transparent plebiscite & rightly so. As soon as they write legislation for plebiscites you can kiss the last of your freedoms GOODBYE

  • @chotaboy66

    So why did he not get assasinated?

    With the Barret 50 cal these days it should be prett easy for you girls to organise an actual "I" and get things done. You have to realise at this hour that there has to be blood spilt right? You have to go and shoot these people. And when it starts it has to be fast, like 20 in one month and then the entire world of jews will be nervous.

    Now, one man could kill 20 traitors in 20 days. If he was intelligent he could avoid trace.

  • @KombiPode I don't incite ,condone or promote violence other than a last resort in self defense .

    Having said that one has to work smart to win this game . Assassination is NOT working smart ? sure it can save time but cutting corners to save time often always results in mistakes & it takes even longer to get the right outcome.

    Unity without competition & division implementing solution in non compliance is working smart . And not even one drop of blood has to be spilled

  • @chotaboy66

    Yeh whop knows. I am tired of it. It will never get solved because everyone had been brainwashed by hollywood holohoax snuff films and so everyone is blinded by who is the elephant in the room. "The jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them".

  • @KombiPode DAMN THOSE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS.

    Here's something to think about. If the JOOOOOOOOOOOOOS have it so good, have you ever considered actually becoming JOOOOOOOOO-ISH? If I convert to Judaism, will I suddenly find a nugget of gold in my mailbox? Will the Fabian UN Commie-Capitalists suddenly invite me to NWO meetings? Why don't you join the winning side? Or are you a loser?

  • @KombiPode Fucking terrorist.

  • @chotaboy66

    "Read section 44 of the Australian constitution , adhering to a foreign power ? ":

    Thats great. I would rather recommend reading the manual on how to use the Barret fully automatic sniper 50 cal rifle for example.

  • Bob Brown is a loon, half of his party are communists, the other half hell-bent Greenies and all are set in removing all our rights. Well, the ones we have left, that is.

  • @LewisTL95 politicalcompass (dot) org/aus2010

    

  • @DamianFinch the laws preventing freedom of speech - such as those targeting offence etc were specifically put in place by politicians. what makes you think the bill of rights they draft will remove this?

  • Gillard and this slimebag liar have duped the sheeple again.THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN REFERENDUM.The court of the people await you barstards.The truth of this scam will expose what criminal scum they really are, the climate cult of deception.The game is over you will no where to hide not even in your chemtrails!!!!!!!!!!!

  • next time a Greene comes over to my place trying to raise membership they are going to get a big fat smack on the head. Introducing Carbon tax is going to kill the green trees you cock sucker.

  • hes a gobshite

  • tool

  • What a wanker he is!!

  • Australia is a corporation, along all the other so called commonwealth 'countries'. This is all just a show, it means absolutely jack shit. Do not underestimate the powers of the ELITE and there coming plans, we must be vigilante.

  • Fuck the greens.

    All they want to do is further disintegrate the already near non-existent rights of us Australians.

  • Brown is criminal, a terrorist against the Australian Commonwealth.

    Its time to torment the greenies in your street, tell them their no good, put a bar of soap in their letter box, smash their solar panels, scratch their new green car!!!

  • Brown is criminal, a terrorist against the Australian Commonwealth.

    Its time to torment that greenie in your street, tell them their no good, put a bar of soap in their letter box, smash their solar panels, scratch their new green car!!!

  • Go and kiss a TREE SENATOR BOB BROWN . GOD SAVE THE QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA AND THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH

  • what a creep

  • i want him to die of AIDS slowly and as painfully as possible

  • @chklitttle Homophobe.

  • I really want to see Bob Brown smile.... Naaa that will be creepy

  • @chotaboy66 uggh CO2 has little or no effect? This has been well and truly put to bed in the scientific community. The blogosphere of course will continue with their scientific illiteracy.

  • @uknowispeaksense I'm sorry your scientific community is divided actually you have been duped into thinking there is majority consensus . If you want to read your precious peer reviewed papers I can qualify literally hundreds & hundreds & hundreds of Peer-Review Papers Skeptical of "Man-Made" Global Warming please by all means see my channel, links on the side & suck it up mate.

  • @chotaboy66 andrew bolt, alex jones, lord monkton? Tell you what. How about you send me the citations to just 5 of your hundreds & hundreds & hundreds of peer reviewed papers. Pick your best 5 and I will teach you about peer review.

  • @uknowispeaksense Oh please you claim ignorantly thinking there are no peer review papers to the contrary of man made climate change I thus give you plenty of peer review papers to read & you only want 5 NOW?. Your kidding me ,read the heading on my channel " Peer-Review Papers Skeptical of "Man-Made" Global Warming " Then click on the links there are literally over a thousand there take your pick .These are REAL climate scientists skeptical of man made climate change, Not bloody Alex Jones

  • @chotaboy66 ok. either you haven't actually read any of those papers in their entirety or you did but didn't understand them. I have a subsribtion to AAAS so can access the Science papers. I have read them. I'm sure you can cherrypick and quote mine as well as any of the bloggers and scientific illiterates you favour but here is my challenge to you. Pick your best peer reviewed paper...your smoking gun...and I will review it for you.

  • @uknowispeaksense I'm sorry Ignorance is the ego's defense against pure fear of reality. Reality is not to be looked upon with fear rather looked upon as just information. Remember Believing Is Not Necessarily Knowing & knowing only comes from conscious observation of all information new & old. Passion can be a strength but too much passion can sometimes blind ones own outlook when ones own ego creates the obsession where the observer is really in a state of open weakness & mistakes are made.

  • @chotaboy66 As a scientist, I have a fair handle on how to be dispassionate. I also know how to read a paper in its entirety and seek more information to clarify any points that I need clarification with. Personally, I wish like hell the evidence for climate change is wrong but it isn't.

  • @uknowispeaksense So you mean to tell me that we are to trust the IPCC literature who merely predicts with computer models that use manipulated input data which in fact DON'T do cloud, which I might add IS water vapor that makes up in the order of 97% Greenhouse gas .Tell me you claim to be a scientist but you use the word carbon broadly which makes me doubt your credibility .Maybe you could START with the vostock ice core literature that clearly show us Co2 follows temperatures ?

  • @chotaboy66 have you been watching climate denial videos? What you are presenting is a strawman. Yes, CO2 followed temperatures but I must ask you to watch this video..... watch?v=8nrvrkVBt24 this will give you the whole picture on that. I just reread the Bond Science paper from 2001 in your list. Nothing in there suggesting global warming isn't happening. Also if you plot there data against actual temperatures there is a divertgence in the last 30 years while the sun has actually weakened.

  • @uknowispeaksense I don't deny the climate change isn't happening but I do deny that man has little to any significance on global temps by his emissions of CO2 . One has to go back more than 30 years to see the big picture which is the problem with all you alarmists, you don't look at all the information sadly .I have seen the video & I know NOW your not who you claim .Because any respectable scientist to the contrary either way would NOT use this video, what papers has Peter Sinclair written?

  • @chotaboy66 lets not play shoot the messenger. your video list has andrew bolt and alan jones ffs. Sinclair's videos summarise thescience accurately. By the way, a large number of your so-called peer reviewed papers are from industry journals and aren't ISI listed journals. In other words they are not legitimate. All the articles from the respected ones like Nature and Science do not discredit AGW at all. It pays to read the things and actually understand what they are saying. I prefer realist

  • @uknowispeaksense Now your Cherry picking ,I just did a quick search. Is the JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY not ISI listed ? I think you will find it is ,GOOD TRY deceiving the reader .So far you haven't qualified any of your preposterous assertions, Please I have given your more than enough evidence & time digressing off video topic & you still deny reality . Ifs people such as your self that propagate lies is the real problem we all face today sadly . you would make a good politician YES?

  • @chotaboy66 It is a respected journal. As is geophysical research Letters and a number of others. There articles don't refute AGW though. You're going to have to do me a favour and link me to the botany paper. You do realise don't you that the oregon petition has been widely discredited due to the fraudulant nature in which it was presented to the "scientists"...not to mention presenting MD's dentists and lawyers as climate scientists is also very dodgy.

  • @uknowispeaksense Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on biomass accumulation and distribution in Eldarica pine trees

    (Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 45, Number 280, pp.1669-1672, 1994)

    - Sherwood B. Idso

    Please go away & take your ignorance,lies & DIGRESSION with you, this video has nothing to do with global warming except for the fact this particular politician is a green representative who promotes a unelectable global government run by banks who currently steal circulation.

  • @chotaboy66 8 seedlings in this entire experiment and they found a correlation between biomass and CO2. Its a shame their sample size wasn't much bigger, the time period much bigger, and its a shame they didn't examine plant pests, diseases, nitirification rates in the soil or altered watering regimes. I have dozens of papers demonstrating the negative impact on 5 of the 6 most important food crops of elevated CO2 in properly designed in situ experiments. By the way, you raised CO2 first.

  • @uknowispeaksense your so-called peer reviewed papers are from industry journals and aren't ISI listed journals.In other words they are not legitimate

    --

    SO YOU ADMIT YOU OUT RIGHT LIED?

    You purport to have some knowledge but you lie in a poor attempt to discredit hundreds & hundreds peer reviewed papers falsely claiming they are not legitimate because they are not in the ISI line up .Now really who do YOU think you are & what authority do YOU have to discredit hundred s of papers. Go away.

  • @chotaboy66 wow and now you cherry pick my post in here. I said ," a number of your so-called peer reviewed......." Why did you leave off the qualifier at the start of my statement? And you accuse me of being dishonest? Wow. I suggest going to university and undertaking a science degree. Maybe you will learn the difference between good science and the blog generated garbage you're peddling. Read the friggin papers you're using as evidence. If you don't understand them, ask someone who does.

  • @uknowispeaksense NO NO its quite clear you were lying or making intentional false assumptions to deceive the reader that none of these peer reviewed papers were legitimate when I proved to the contrary according to your master journals ,its in your writing & any intelligent person reading your words can see this.You failed yourself making false assumptions without qualifying your assumption & you call yourself a scientist? Give me a break please go away & push your lies somewhere else you phony

  • @chotaboy66 and now u r putting words in my mouth. U have plenty of peer reviewed papers. The problem is, unlike you, I have actually read some of them and of those, not one of them supports your claims. In fact most of them categorically state the opposite. Read the bloody things and then point out to me exactly where they prove that AGW isn't occurring. The problem is you've just copied the links to these papers directly from a couple of blogsites and put your faith that the blogger read them.

  • @uknowispeaksense Well i invite anyone to go to my channel click on the links & read what the bloggers have found. I have done enough research to sink a ship . Not even climate change Australia can provide me with physical evidence of man made climate change after several letters requesting so, I even asked what exactly comes out of our coal fire power plant stacks & they couldn't demonstrate any evidence which has adverse effects to health nor the climate. Now please Go away for the last time.

  • @uknowispeaksense your so-called peer reviewed papers are from industry journals and aren't ISI listed journals.In other words they are not legitimate

    --

    SO YOU ADMIT YOU OUT RIGHT LIED?

    You purport to have some knowledge but you lie in a poor attempt to discredit hundreds & hundreds peer reviewed papers falsely claiming they are not legitimate because they are not in the ISI line up .Now really who do YOU think you are & what authority do YOU have to discredit hundred s of papers. Go away

  • Here's a list of things I hate :

    Electric Cars, Speed Camera's, Americans, Light Food, Vegans, Liers and Bob Brown and the Extreme Greens.

    They don't know how to be australian. They don't know what a BBQ is. They have never gone fishing, hunting or 4wdriving in the outback. And they don't know what camping is either.

    The Extreme Greens are dangerous and UNAUSTRALIAN. They DO NOT represent the majority of Australians. Vote Katter's Australian Party and reclaim Australia for Australians.

  • @ihaveairlockers vote katter an everyone wins a free banjo, a ute with truck mudflaps, a dog cage full of fleabitten mongrel dogs, and thr right to call anyone who thinks shooting anything that moves wrong, unaustrayan.

  • @uknowispeaksense

    Thank you. I rest my case :-)

  • A plebiscite is just a way of measuring public sentiment - nothing more, nothing less.

    It is, as you suggest, a formal opinion poll, used commonly by representative governments.

    It would not remove any requirement for a referendum to actually change our system of government. It would not allow parliament to bypass the constitution.

    It would allow parliament to do a better job of understanding the Australian peoples' position on our structure of government, to better reflect their wishes.

  • @IneptWolf A plebiscite is just a way of measuring public sentiment - nothing more, nothing less.

    It is, as you suggest, a formal opinion poll, used commonly by representative governments

    --

    I'm sorry there is no constitution provision for plebiscites in any law within Australia & rightly so . please read what is under the video mate. I have had this conversation too many times to count now & I'm sick of peoples blind ignorance to be honest. .

  • There is an alternative to the carbon tax which will drastically reduce emissions, create tens of thousands of jobs and cost taxpayers very little. watch?v=qImNRuV4G0Q

  • @uknowispeaksense Thanks for the comment , I think todays renewable energy could not sustain our keep up with usage to be frank. Moreover Co2 emissions are NO danger if one looks at all the natural carbon emissions that are in the order of 97% in total.As for the carbon tax well this is further extortion as a direct result of a theft of our monetary circulation by a purposeful banking obfuscation of our very own promissory obligations to each other.& jobs are created by the people not government

  • @chotaboy66 if you download the link in my video and read the document you will see that not only is it possible but it also accounts for increased population, growth etc.

  • @uknowispeaksense thanks I will have a look at it soon , but can ask a question will this renewable energy solution fix a corrupt monetary system which is the root cause of all this .I would imagine we would have to address the banks that would finance any feasible renewable energy solution first? .For if they the bank indeed did finance this they would only falsify the debt into their possession thus decreasing jobs in the end by terminal falsified indebtedness .Follow the money :)

  • @chotaboy66 probably but banks are banks and will make their money one way or another. the big picture for us with this idea apart from becoming carbon neutral in termsof energy production but the opportunity to drive the technology and manufacturing thereby increasing jobs. who knows? All I know is the carbon tax in its current form will just hit everyone and do nothing in terms of reducing pollution and little to demonstrate to the world what is possible.

  • @uknowispeaksense I advocate , teach & debate a 43 year irrefutable proof of solution which is Mathematically perfected economy that has not yet been disproven, Those who claim they can disprove MPE always evade public debate or even a simple discussion for that matter . Indeed to see the solution one first has to see the root problem in its detail . May I suggest 4 videos or 1 hour of your time please search youtube " Mike Montagne 1/4 (MPE) ONE PROBLEM , ONE SOLUTION 16.07.11 "

    Peace:)

  • @chotaboy66 I'd rather read a peer reviewed paper.

  • @uknowispeaksense I'm sorry banks don't make money they acquire unearned profit which is really a theft of circulation by a purposeful obfuscation of our very own promissory obligations to one another in any purported loan from a bank which ULTIMATELY DESTROYS JOBS .until you see this you we will have NO renewable energy.The big picture is CO2 has little to no effect on climate & all banks are destroying our nation & the world by a systemic manipulation of property & money under everyones nose.

  • @uknowispeaksense I'm sorry banks don't make money they acquire unearned profit which is really a theft of circulation by a purposeful obfuscation of our very own promissory obligations to one another in any purported loan from a bank which ULTIMATELY DESTROYS JOBS .until you see this you we will have NO renewable energy.The big picture is CO2 has little to no effect on climate & all banks are destroying our nation & the world by a systemic manipulation of property & money under everyones nose

  • what happened :/

  • Here we go again! How many times do Australians have to vote NO to a republic? Eventually it will probably pass and then there's going back. Once you remove the crown we have lost all protection we currently have in our law. If you think we won't you better do some research.Unlawful Acts and Bills have already been introduced into the Australian legislation which effect your rights, liberty and nations independence. In essence, becoming a republic will reducing our freedom and sovereignty.

  • Who ever we vote for we are stuffed it is definate that the labour party and greens are nwo, what do you think the carbon tax is about, agenda 21 is already been implemented by our local councils as for the liberal party more of the same just not as obvious, so who do we vote for?Climate skeptics party or katter;s a.p?

  • @deeunitt ALL PARTY'S ARE NWO ,See the red block on the video HOW TO SACK THE AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT AT ELECTION TIME , Click on it ? There is a way sack ALL party's ,getting your name ticked off preserves your right & ability choose who serves you . If you don't think any are worthy WE as a majority can vote them ALL out thus forcing a second election with fresh candidates , The key is to keep doing SO until we have candidates addressing the issues such as you mention in full transparency :)

  • Bob Brown is a traitor, if we become a republic God help us... we voted against it ...Go to Crowhouse. and find out the truth about it and the outcome of the republic..Lose our constitution.. and open door the the New World Order...don't believe me do the research and find out for your selves. Come oh Aussies don't be fooled by these traitors.They are allowing fracking in Australia and Monsanto to bring in GMO wheat... what will that do to our farmers and then us. ..

  • Comment removed

  • @Dxyze How deluded can you people be to think that a plebiscite is treason?

    --

    Think what you will in ignorance of all information available sir ,please read my replies to other comments regarding questions such as yours & read more information under the video THANK YOU..

  • @chotaboy66 You're clearly retarded.

    This is in no way an "illegal plebiscite bill".

  • @Dxyze NO NO NO your delirious ,I wrote if this unconstitutional non transparent plebiscite bill which has no provisions in current law nor any constitution is passed changing current constitutional acts to allow it into law & yes vote is ticked by ignorant individuals such as your self it will conceal all the illegal activity & invalid laws that has transpired & passed over the years which still are in clear breach of the Comwlth Constitution by omitting referendums to the people ,GOT IT MATE?

  • Comment removed

  • @Dxyze We have independence.. read our constitution go to Max Igin site and read it...We don't need NWO for god sake...

  • Keep the monarchy, allow Charles and Camilla to rise to power and institute widespread dictatorial hardships and return to 'civilize' their colonies! Power to the Empire!

    Bob Brown should be managing an obscure/dubious natural health pharmacy or something, not vying for power! Down with the tree huggers! Slay the pissies!

  • Respond to this video... Did you know his was a medical Doctor, Dr kill me quick lol..

  • @AMWORTHY1 PAGING DR FAGGOT

  • This Bob Brown is a fucking worry. A homo socialist bigotted man with no policies; no brains and a pack of dykes surrounding him in his GREEN party. GREEN? They really are a pack of REDS...

  • Wow, you're an idiot

  • To change from a commonwealth to a republic is an expensive and quite possibly a dangerous cross-grade. It won't change a dam thing, expect give politicians a chance to medle with fundamental laws.

    We live in a world in increasing interconectivness, internet, economies, trade. We are starting to see the emergence of world wide culture and problems are now too big for just one country to tackle alone.

    We need a world government not this utterly redundant idea of republic, thats so 1700's.

  • @TheFluffyDuck You of off with the fairies Learn more about new world order for god sake ..Big Brother will be watching you don't you know omg

  • We have filthy, vile traitors in our midst, people with darkness in their hearts who scheme and plot our ruin amoungst the dark places where they skitter like insects, always avoiding the light. We must bring forth the light of truth and drive them from their places of hiding and reveal unto all the vile schemes they so carefully prepare, for they can not tolerae the light and are hurt by it...

  • @FluffyWesties I agree with you ... but do it with noncompliance had have love not free I agree with Max Igin at crowhouse..site.study all you can ... so we Australian can over come the ass wipes.. Already the Labor Government are selling us out...find out about fracking and Monsanto...

  • I was for a Republic, until I realised that the people wil loose the protection of the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights and The Australian Constitution. The greens are dangerous and promoters of the One World Order. We have to through these bastards out and wipe them of the Policitial Map. What we need is the Switz model of Government. CIR - Citizen's Initiated Referendum, allows the poeople the right to have their say. Fight for It, our childern's future will be of slavery to the greedy

  • @selley2005a Thank you , I agree with a swiss model minus the banks intervening on our business & commerce thus stealing & laundering our wealth & monetary circulation by fraud.

  • @selley2005a Good on you..you have a brain..Bob Brow is a weak easily led wimp He has allow the Parliament to pass a bill to allow fracking to happen in Australia and Monsanto to bring in GMO wheat. and the carbon tax is a fraud. Tehy are full of bull shit... these action proves that the labor government.. are in the pockets of the NWO..Go to Max Igin site ..not allowed to type in there tried already many times...He is Aussie and cares about our country..

  • Respond to this video...co to Crow house.com

  • Respond to this video... I applaud you  selley... good on you... you have a brain to think

  • @selley2005a That Bloody Bob Brow Green is a traitor... no republic the Australian people voted NO you traitor The Greenies which i call dirty browns...Carbon tax is bull sit as well . these moron don't study the research ...The government serves the people that is why they are called Public servant...Be ware that they will try to change our constitution... Traitors...no new world order in Australia... go to crow house Max Igin and see the truth. we need more Max Igins support him Aussies... 

  • @selley2005a That Bloody Bob Brow Green is a traitor... no republic the Australian people voted NO you traitor The Greenies which i call dirty browns...Carbon tax is bull sit as well . these moron don't study the research ...The government serves the people that is why they are called Public servant...Be ware that they will try to change our constitution... Traitors...no new world order in Australia... go to Max Igins siter and see the truth. we need more Max Igins support him Aussies...

  • Respond to this video... Max Igin is a true blue Aussie bless with youtube wont let me post his site but you people and get around that Think of crow who lives in a house. lol...all you need to know is in that site..the law of trust as well study it..  Gillard is traitor as well do you know she lives with a Zionist Lobbyist check them out as well NWO Australian need to get to gether and make these thing know..

  • Respond to this video... together we stand divided we fall.. Divine bless Austgralia 

  • @selley2005a Australia isn't protected by the Bill of Rights you fuckclump.

  • @apuppetstate Too bad its ignored hey :)

  • @chotaboy66 The reason it's "ignored," is that it's not a legal document applicable to Australia. It's a series of amendments to the US Constitution, pertaining to the rights of US citizens, and it has no significane or reference whatsoever to Australia or its people. If you do not understand this basic idea then you're a complete degenerate.

  • @apuppetstate Indeed you are correct there is no constitutional or statutory protection of our human rights here in Australia & for the record your assumptions claiming I'm some degenerate is coming from a place of ignorance I'm sorry. If memory serves me correct there has been times where our government has fallen upon the UK bill of rights1689.

  • @apuppetstate Indeed you are correct there is no constitutional or statutory protection of our human rights here in Australia & for the record your assumptions claiming I'm some degenerate is coming from a place of ignorance I'm sorry. If memory serves me correct there has been times where our government has fallen upon the UK bill of rights1689

  • @chotaboy66 So you admit there is no statutory protection of most human rights in Australia, good, by that logic becoming a republic would not "remove," any of those protections as there are none in place at the moment. I'm aware of no precedent set in our system by the UK bill of rights but if there was it would have com from a time when we still had in place at least a theoretical staturory link to the UK justice system, we no longer have that connection thanks to the Australia act.

  • @apuppetstate we no longer have that connection thanks to the Australia act -

    Im sorry one only has to look at the omissions of referendum according to our constitution 128 ,parliament are in clear breach of trust by omitting referendum on several counts & the Australia act is just one count thats the very evidence of this breach of trust. Im sorry you come across claiming some knowledge but Im afraid you have just demonstrated clear ignorance of the law & you can only thank yourself for that

  • @apuppetstate So you admit there is no statutory protection of most human rights in Australia.

    --

    NO I don't ,A Statutory Instrument in law is a form of delegated or secondary legislation SO I'm saying we have no bill of rights thats accompanying our constitution which you clearly haven't cited or fail to comprehend.Its not a republic I'm concerned about its the breach of trust by purposeful non transparency evident by omission of referendum by preempt deception & the Australia act is just one

  • @apuppetstate If you think the Australia act has some importance protecting your rights bud YOU WOULD BE WRONG , may I suggest you search Youtube " Brigalow Corp and The Loss of Ownership Rights in Australia 1/4 " Your beloved Australia act you ignorantly cite & thank has paved a way for the bastards in removing our bloody ownership rights by changing state constitutions in Australia, well at lest they are using it in a attempt to do so by omitting state referendums also .

  • the uk bill of rights is now influential only insofar as it is a globally influential document as it is a very early espousal of the philosophies of human rights. not even the UK has a legal connection in any way to it. similar with the magna carta; it has no legal significance here or anywhere else in the world, its significance is purely because of the ideas and influence it exerts. claiming we would lose the "protection," of these documents were we to become a republic is just bizarre.

  • @apuppetstate Bizarre indeed for I myself did not make such a claim but I will write that the magna carter had some contribution to constitutional development & it would be fair to conclude certain rights contained in the bill of rights are already recognized in common law itself.

  • @selley2005a We have no bill of rights in Aus. and the constitution has no legal binding rights, simply a 'gentlemen's agreement'.

  • @selley2005a no such thing as a one world order. If/when we do become a republic, we'll just replace the Queen with someone else, (probably unelected). Anyway: fundamental constitutional changes will not be implemented: 1. they're bloody expensive, 2. they're not needed, 3. fucking effort.

    The Swiss model only allows for citizens to put forth bills; nothing more. Pretty useless; just write to your representative. Also, the Magna Carta is legislatively outdated, and there is no bill of rights.

  • the rare video of bob brown talking openly about his plans. normally he goes through Julia

  • That hanson young rat sitting in the background. Makes me sick.

  • TREASON!!!!

    the bastard-GET THEM OUT....

  • The Queens rolling in with the New World Order Just check out (Fall of the Repulic HQ full length version) by Alan Jones Here on youtube.

  • @Stringyheads Please look past these servants acting in breach of trust & look at the banking fraud in detail only then one will see the puppet masters,one will see one is deceived into thinking one has no power on the contrary we the people create all money & all banks intervene on our commerce by fraud,manipulate markets & govs even royalty to they're agendas,Reality is WE have the real power WE are the true creditors & WE ,YES? create money only one is deceived into thinking one has no power.

  • Respond to this video... The Queen is the new world order..with all the other wealthy families....The constitution is the important thing Max Igin has posted on his site but i suggest you go through his site ... great Australian care about his country.. as I do. there are also YouTube from his site...Crowhouse.

  • BTW Gillard and Bob Brown are bed fellows in the Fabian, fascist society where the aim is to destroy the dollar by flooding the market with paper debt that undermines the value of the dollar forcing middle class and working class ppl to sell their private assets back to the banksters and govt making us reliant on the NWO system which in reality is a global fascist regime, its the plan ppl its right before your very eyes, dont say the apple is an orange when it is not

  • Im a republican but not for the NWO a sovereign Australian republic is what I believe in fuck the queen and the useless monarchy who continue to live off our backs, they have no power, they just pompus display puppets to remind us of an era in which many of our ancestors suffered..and stop saying its our heritage if we keep saying that we're gonna keep living in the past, time to move forward ppl, republic where the ppl are the constitutional glue not the pedophile poliies

  • @ValukaX Under our Constitution the people have the last say really read sec 128 , they cant do squat not even the queen without putting it to a referendum first .Only our constitution is being ignored every day by all politicians & the governor general . i Advocate mathematically perfected economy proof of solution, a constitutional mandate amendment we all can use but most people don't really know exactly how banks are screwing us,most are parroting misinformation so no one sees the solution:(

  • @chotaboy66 Thats why I'm gonna do my best to arm myself and others to the core when Martial Law is implemented here or when such a time arises where treasonous acts are becoming too unbearable for the ppl they will have a means and way to enact revenge and hold accountable all those treasonous snakes in parliament and in the banking sectors, its not wishful thinking there are alot of us who didnt hand our guns in after port arthur we all knew what that was about..inside job...

  • @ValukaX Marshall law will only be implemented if the peoples actions in division warrant this path of action ,remember this is a war of the mind ,history teaches one that the peoples compliance with any law makes it law,one only has to look at German people they indeed allowed themselves to be divided neighbor against neighbor granting they're own power over to a psychopath politician,when & if this division happens Marshall law will be ultimately the peoples own choice in my humble opinion .

  • @ValukaX Mass non compliance & very importantly unity is the key in solution which is paramount, we should be focusing on solution & its within my own research there is really one root problem that is the cause of most of the symptoms of division in todays society & there is one POOF of solution,violence is not a primary course of action & it is only to be used in defense after all avenues of solution are exhausted.There is one true avenue of solution in unity , that is MPE .ALL BANKS MUST GO.

  • Get rid of Bob Brown... what an appropriate name....

  • germ

  • This will never be treason. 

  • Hang him for treason.

    Write to the Queen and flood her with msgs, the only reason they get away with treason is simple, the uk and entire commonwealth and western world do not speak out.

    Write, if you havent then you only have yourself to blame, fucking wake up and remmeber that, sitting around and pointing at the problem and shouting like degenerate third world baboons hoping someone else is listening and going to do something for it....is exactly why you deserve tyranny.

  • @CelticAngloPress uh Bob's seeking to change the system of Government using peaceful means which he is allowed to do also no crime in Australia is punishable by death.

  • @irishgodfatherchris Treason & its not punishable by death here in Australia but one has to realize bobs actions are a clear cut consequence of deception by others adhering to foreign powers attempting to undermine the Australian Constitution & the sovereign people of Australia by deception fraud thats evident in the many invalid laws enforced now state & federal . I do remind you SIR Concealing a act of treason IS indeed a crime of treason in its self , POLITICIANS ARE NOT EXEMPT SIR .

  • @chotaboy66 oh of course and you'll use the doctored summons to say that he has been charged which is bullshit, one because its a federal matter and the Federal Courts would deal with it not State Courts and two any court higher than Magistrates do not have summons.

  • @irishgodfatherchris I'm sorry your assumption is incorrect & your apparent ignorance prevails , If you knew the Constitution WHICH YOU DON'T any indictment can only be heard by a jury sir .The high courts DON'T DO JURY'S I'm afraid the indictment still sits & waiting in the supreme court or Victoria only being withheld for a reason. Please by all means refer to so called fraudulent document you falsely claim as reference & give the supreme court of Victoria a call for verification..