Added: 4 years ago
From: UTubeTalkRadio
Views: 2,959
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Breaking climate news…

    Global floating ice in 'constant retreat' – study

    The world's floating ice is in "constant retreat," showing an instability which will increase global sea levels, according to a report published in Geophysical Research Letters on Wednesday.

    Floating ice had disappeared at a steady rate over the past 10 years, according to the first measurement of its kind.

    REUTERS

    May 28, 2010

  • Breaking climate news..

    Cameras to monitor melting Everest A technical team from the American organization Extreme Ice Survey recently installed five special time-lapse cameras in the Mount Everest region to monitor the melting of the glaciers.

    HIMALAYAN TIMES

    NEPAL

    May 31, 2010

  • AGW total BS for the weak minded to follow.

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons is the obstruction party of NO ... the meocons are mind controlled mega ditto heads ... rushbo, the defacto leader of the gop was saying not to worry about global warming hurricanes, flooding, drought, polar permafrost thaw, or tornadoes ... but to me ... galveston island looked terrible after the hurricane ... before the hurricane hit ... people were told that if they stayed, they will die .. some didn't listen and used their cell phones to report their mistake

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons is the obstruction party of NO ... the neocons are mind controlled mega ditto heads ... the rushbo meocons, i mean neocons, wish a depression ... but when it comes to global warming, they mainly focus on their temperature measurements that they say is going down ... they know better ... but they do not explain why flowers are blooming a month earlier now than in the 1960's ... and why birds following the blooming flower food sources are dying off like crazy

  • Okay. For you "intellectuals" who insist on pushing this CRAP, a simple explanation via a descriptive example:

    A pot of water (the Earth) just out of a freezer with a frozen surface (polar ice) sitting next to a stove with low heat (low activity sun). Same pot next to the same stove w/ the heat turned up (more active sun). Ice melts, vapor (CO2) forms. Turn stove down, water COOLS and vapor diminishes.

    Now, HOW FREAKING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND?!?!

    Gore=Hack

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons is the obstruction party of NO ... the neocons are mind controlled mega ditto heads ... they have always said real scientists like their weather channel guy who was trained in only journalism was all they needed to lead them in climate science ... but real scientists are already working in the world's first zero carbon emission, 100% renewable energy polar research station in Antarctica .. they're doing it because they see global warming every day in antarctica

  • the rushie herbert hoover neocons are misleading their minions about global warming again ... saying that global warming always means higher temperatures ... they ignore the ice at the poles melting like crazy and that the melting of polar ice is what is keeping temperature constant ... while co2 levels are hockey sticking ... liars ...same for 911, prisoner torture, ken lay's energy crisis, falsifying iraq intelligence, eavesdropping, bank deregulation, palins thanks but no thanks ... on & on

  • I do not understand why this "consensus" is so important, it means nothing. I think common sense easily indicates the global warming is a joke. Some of you hacks would have people believe that CO2 all gathers up in the atmosphere and creates a hurricane! Also, the IPCC claims they understand 20% of the climate system. If Al Gore is right, he has made one of the incredible discoveries of our lifetime. I suggest some of you look into cloud research because they are the key in solving this debate.

  • According to Natl Geo 14 Apr 07, Mars warming due to dust storms uncovering darker surface. The article refers to research from NASA Ames Research Center. I will never understand how anyone can listen to and believe Rush or Fox.

  • the rushie neocons are sooo much like killers charlie manson and jefferie dahmer that i confuse the three ... they don't seem to realize that a higher power is watching them ... take rushie radio ... scoffing micheal moore ... laughing at global warming & hurricanes ... but three hurricanes seem to be headed toward the eib southern command ... cat 4 hanna, ike, josophine ... diabolical ... the neocons spend $400M+ for show biz talk shows to dupe the dopes ... but they had to knock off russert

  • Man-made global warming effects have been demonstrated since the 1950s (see Charles Keeling and Roger Ravelle). Only a tiny handful of crackpots, bobbleheads uninterested in plain, solid facts, and oil industry hacks like Sen. Inhofe (can you believe this guy?) argue otherwise, if you can even call these bloviations "arguments." There has rarely been a more complete scientific consensus about a phenomenon than the virtually unanimous opinions on the human origins of present-day global warming.

  • Wow--(yawn)--what a "tough" call on who deserves more credence on the topic of global warming: the vast majority of the world's academic scientific community, or a draft dodging pill popping fatassed blowhard whose academic credentials consist of lasting one year at Southwest Missouri State University.

  • well lets just say al gore wants big smoke stack companies, that means any company with a giant smoke stack, he is trying to make them buy carbon credits, see in order to pollute the world you have to pay for it by buying credist so they can pay to fix the "damage", note al gore owns one of the biggest carbon credits dealers out there. so as you start worring about the environment, al gore is rolling in money laughing at you.

  • Let's please remember also that the earth has experienced centuries of warmer climate than today - and the world did not end, the cuddly polar bears did not become extinct, and the world cooled again - as it will yet again.

  • no its not

  • OK, so there is still a debate about it. How do we really prove it? By doing it. Yes, I mean let's get into hybrids and adopt alternative energy. And when we do that we'll see if it is getting any warmer. As a matter of fact, Rush and all other right-wing host are SUPPOSED to be encouraging this solution, not ridiculing them. After all, how do we reduce the insurgencies in Iraq as well as terrorism, in general? Yes, less dependence on Saudi Arabia, suspected of aiding them.

  • No there is no debate about it. Every big, credible scientific organization agrees, that human-caused global climate change is real, and it's gonna have bad concequenses. RocketManF4, what is your source for saying that the globe isn't warmer. You can't just say "no its not", and expect us to believe you without any credible evidence.

  • Maybe or maybe not. Regardless, we should be getting out of oil anyway.

  • Yes the world has warmed before, but 85% of the Earth's population didn't live on the coast when it did.

  • Really?!? Bush caused 9/11?!? Bush was president for a year before 9/11. One year. You think the attack was orchestrated in one year... Please!!! Why does no one ever mention the eight years that Clinton was in office prior to 9/11? Think!!! Use your heads!!! Don't just succumb to what's being pandered to you by the powers that be.

  • the only thing that bush has done to america was cause 9/11

  • Do you really think he's bright enough to cause 9/11? One would think even THAT diabolical act would require someone capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.

  • omg u americans , i cant believe that you vote in George bush year after year , ur all almost as dum as he is voting in that idiot youve all been scammed by him and his government , doesnt anybody realize that bushes family owns and has positions in oil many companys?????

  • he has been voted in two times once every 4 years not year after year

  • It was so hot today, I saw a dog chase a cat and they're both walking...

  • haha!

  • "that is all the movement has... consensus"

    all we have is a scientific consensus? well then, that sounds like it's not too bad, does it?

  • Science isn't consensus, it's fact.  That's the point of this post.

  • The impeccably free market magazine the Economist wrote recently that action on global warming is analogous to having a military: It is true that Canada is unlikely to be attacked soon, but isn't it a good idea to have an army anyway? The same is true of global warming: even if you are skeptical, why should we not protect ourselves? the only argument you have, it seems to me, is sheer hatred of anyone who criticizes our lifestyle.

  • I have no hatred, just pity. Why waste your time over something you can't control? If there is "global warming" it's because of the sun or the planet - not because of humanity. We didn't create the planet, we can't destroy it and we can't control it. It's complete human arrogance to think we are beyond what we actually are.

  • Scientists disagree with you on this. They think it is man made. Bury your head in the sand if you want, but you don't know more than them.

  • You said it yourself, "They think this is man made." In your own words this means it's not fact, but a theory. This whole thing is about trying to control other people's lives. If you wanna "go completely green," I could give two shits. Do what you want. Just don't try and legislate how I should live when you're intimating that 2 + 2 = 5.

  • We may not be able to stop it but according to the Natural Resources Defense Council, if we don't change at all then by 2050, we'll have produced 2.6 gigatons of carbon emissions; if we do, it might be 0.8. Also, you can't exactly do anything you want or else we'd be driving cars as big as the White House. I do believe in freedom of lifestyle so long as you don't hurt others. BTW, if Rush is so smart why doesn't he interview scientists who SUPPORT the man-made global warming theory?

  • Per the end of your question, "BTW, if Rush is so smart why doesn't he interview scientists who SUPPORT the man-made global warming theory?"

    Because it would be like interviewing a mathematician who argues that 2 + 2 = 5. It's pointless and a complete waste of time.

  • Pointless? He got Roy Spencer, a skeptic, on. What about 60 Minutes who interviewed James Hansen, who claims to have been muzzled for speaking out against the Bush Administration's stance on this issue? I don't think that interview was complicated. I want to see him win debate over one of the scientists just to PROVE Al Gore is an idiot.

  • "Per the end of your question, "BTW, if Rush is so smart why doesn't he interview scientists who SUPPORT the man-made global warming theory?"

    Because it would be like interviewing a mathematician who argues that 2 + 2 = 5. It's pointless and a complete waste of time. "

    And one of your premises in support of Lush Rimjob IS that 2+2=5?

  • aghniyya, please don't be so arogant and ignorant. A great many respected scientists do NOT agree with the whole 'man-made' argument. To say (quote) 'they think it is man-made' is false. SOME do, SOME don't. Listen to the other point of view too - there's good science behind it.

  • Like whom?

  • I really don't understand why people listen to this guy. Please God forgive them.

  • Because he knows what hes talking about dufuse..

  • Global warming is caused by farting cows and CO2 we exhale. Why don't conservatives believe it? It makes so much sense because a drop out like Al Gore says so.

  • For a nice short refutation of manmade global warming, watch my video "Global Warming Sun"

  • Rush has interviewed Roy Spencer. So, yes, he has spoken to real scientists. Many scientists are skeptics. Check out my new video "Global Warming: An Unsettled Science"

  • maryk2112, Do you really think that the climate is going to change that much? Did you notice that there are still a lot of below average temperature days?

  • This is like saying that because there is a lot of food in America, there can't be starving people in Africa.

  • I wonder what Rush would be saying about global warming if it was a Republican who was making movies and marching around the country making a case for it?

    Did anyone else notice that Limbaugh really kicked up a lot of crap about global warming during the Walter Reed Army Hospital fiaso in order to avoid discussing that problem? Limbaugh bends over for the Bush administration every day and is nothing but a very highly paid propaganameister who thinks he comes across as a comedian.

  • Where will rush be after the climate changes? Will Rush admit he is wrong? Will it matter?

    Who will hold this jackass accountable for the misinformation and BS?

  • Genius. Maybe I should just quit being a scientist and allow this talk radio host, who lacks a college degree, to do all the enlightened hypothesizing. (For those of you who make up a large part of youtube's userbase, I was being sarcastic.)

  • If everybody needs a college degree in every field before we're able to comment on anything in that field, how many college degrees would a typical person need? Think before you speak.

  • I suppose I was being a bit hyperbolic. My point was that 99% of scientists in this field agree that global warming is caused by humans. And Rush bases his disagreement on what? The fact that his stance parallels his political views? That seems a bit selfish, doesn't it? Science seeks fact. Punditry seeks followers.

  • then quit using lies with golbal warming

  • gismotech, please stop being so childish. I'm an environmentalist because I'm working in this field and know what's going on, not the other way around. When you say something like "then quit using lies with golbal warming" it shows that you don't really know anything about the issue. And it's not because you're stupid, it's because you realize that the truth might conflict with your political beliefs.

  • the truth does not conflict with my political beliefs

    The problem, however is this: the Pacific Ocean has not risen in the last decade. "The data does not support any sea-level rise at all," says Wolfgang Scherer, the director of Australia's National Tidal Facility at Flinder's University in Adelaide. The facility, funded by Australian aid, has over the last decade installed tide gauges across the Pacific, including one at Tuvalu's capital atoll, Funafuti.

  • temperatures in Glacial Park today are almost identical to what they were 107 years ago. So where is the 3 and 1/2 degree increase that NBC claimed was melting the glaciers? This change comes by looking at the data beginning in 1950, when for a variety of reasons the temperature was far lower than it was in 1895.

  • the anomaly is not that the glaciers are melting -- they were almost certainly melting as soon as that part of the West emerged from a cold period that ended sometime in the middle of the 19th century. The anomaly is that this melting was temporarily slowed down around 1950. Michaels asks,

  • Why didn't NBC check the regional temperature records for western Montana? Instead of recycling an old story, they could have produced a much better one -- real news -- by showing that Glacier's' glaciers have been melting like this for well over a century and are doing so without any net regional summer warming in the last 100 years.

    Ah, but recycling nonsense is so much easier.

  • without global warming you don't have a job so it benifits to have global warming not me.

  • First off, no my job does not depend on whether there is global warming or not. What made you assume that?

  • Second, you can cherrypick data all you want. All I have to do to support my argument is point out that there are thousands of peer reviewed articles written by REAL scientists that say climate change is real and it has to be addressed. If this is the "controversial issue" that you are making it out to be, where are the thousands real scientists that support your view? They don't exist. And the articles that do support you aren't scientific or peer reviewed.

  • data is data if the temp has not changed in montana for 107 years then why are the glaciers melting, without any warming. that is fact.

  • Australia's National Tidal Facility at Flinder's University in Adelaide I suppose they just make up thier data, or is it you that does all the cherrypicking of data, of which you posted none. I gave you facts you gave me none.

  • And there was global cooling 30 years ago. "The Next Ice Age," was on on the cover of Time Magazine in the mid-70's. Also, how come in all these "models" which predict or "prove" global warming the Sun isn't factored in?

  • am i not a scientist, nor are you. we trust scientists constantly in our lives. why do you choose this moment to decide you understand science better than them?

  • I never said I didn't trust scientists. I said science isn't consensus.

  • And dare I even mention the IPCC, or will this turn into a U.N. trashing session? I've said all I have to. Unlike many conservatives, I know when to pull out of a pointless war- er, I mean youtube debate :)

  • there was no debate you provide no facts I did that means your side was pointless

  • If you wanna waste your time trying to control other people's lives in an effort to control something that is totally out of our control, be my guest. This planet, galaxy, and universe will be here long after humans are gone - regardless of what we do. Realize humanity's place in the whole scheme of things and I promise you, you'll be happier. God bless.

  • You got that right

  • Hilarious. Come on, Rush, you and I both know that you didn't ask a "legitimate scientist" if science is based on consensus, because anyone who is even superficially familiar with how science works know that you reported the opposite of the truth. ALL scientific knowledge is gained through a laborious process of building consensus about the answers to scientific questions. Rush is just makin' stuff up again.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more