When Ivan Lendl was #1 in the world (1987), he talked about his recent practice sets with Rod Laver. Lendl was in his late 20's and his prime. Laver was in his late 40's and retired. Lendl said that their recent match was 6-3,6-3, which is amazingly close for that kind of age discrepancy. This isn't as much of an age difference, but it kinda makes you wonder how it would have went down if Sampras & Federer played in the same era. Fed's the most complete, ever. Pete's the most imposing, ever.
@cain2335 NOBODY had the volley's Pete had in his prime. Like in boxing, here's how I see the "tale of the tape": Backhand: Federer. (By far, especially the variety). Forehand: Draw. (Sampras had a better running forehand. Fed has a better transition forehand). 1st Serve: Sampras. 2nd Serve: Sampras. Volleys: Sampras. Return: Federer Spin & Shot variation: Federer (by far). Touch: Federer Power: Sampras Clay Court: Federer (by far) Hard Court: Draw Grass Court: Sampras (but very close).
@theatlantean3 well some things here are due to different circumstances, like the spin. Federer produces more spin bc he has luxilon rough in his racquet. on today's grass: sampras. on actual grass: sampras by miles. same with hard courts. and federer barely hits returns that pressure the server. he just chips them back or hits them back and starts the rally. and people did have better volleys than pete did back then, like edberg, johnny mac and pat rafter
@cain2335 i don't know, i went back&watched a video of Pete vs. Mac in the 1990 U.S Open, and came to the conclusion that Pete had the best volley, ever. I used to think it was my childhood "heroes", Mac, Edberg, Pat Cash, and Becker who had better volleys. And yes, Rafter had some amazing hands, too. But go back and watch that 1990 U.S Open match between Mac and Pete, or the match between Pete and Roddick in 2002. Those 2 matches sealed my opinion of Sampras being the greatest volleyer, ever.
@cain2335 Good point on the string though. Had Pete used the same string in the same racquet (like he's doing now), he may have had some more "action" on the ball. But I still think Fed's little chip / slice backhand, mixed with how he comes over the ball on that side (the return when he has time) is far better than Sampras ever had on the backhand side. I'm the same age as Pete and grew up playing the same time, so I'm a big Sampras fan, but I put Federer right there with him on the GOAT list.
@theatlantean3 i agree with federer's backhand being better, especially how he comes over the ball. sampras did come over it well, but not with the same spin and power. that's partially bc of how fast the courts were back then, and how the ball skidded low and fast. that doesn't happen in todays game; the ball sits up more
@cain2335 yeah, the courts have been slowed down quite a bit, but the balls are hit harder. The players today simply go after the ball more with faster swing speed, so even though the court is slower today, the ball is coming at you harder than back when i was competing (80's / 90's). Even my childhood role-model Mats Wilander plays a more aggressive game now than he did back in the 80's. I recently saw him workout when he came into town & he spoke about that very thing.
@theatlantean3 yep, i remember that about lendl-laver... there's an old utube vid w/ laver vs. connors, amazing stuff- no question rod "the rocket" laver was a beast...
my fav all time (b4 fed) was mac... sampras' volleys were gr8 but no one can deny edberg's volleys... also, i def would not choose those 2 matches to highlight sampras' volleys: 1990 was b4 his prime and 2002 was after
btw folks, this was an EXHIBITION... DID U C SAMPRAS' TWEENER SHOT??? this "match" is not real
Some just need to calm down. There is no way that you can say Federer is better than Sampras or if Sampras is better than Federer. These two never got to play each other when they were both in their prime. You can speculate, but you will never know who would have beaten who.
pete was right on his comments the other day....part of his retirement from tennis was because he felt he had nothing else to prove...he was right on...pete is a true champion and a legend just like federer is....both of them are amazing !i like nadal very much but he has to prove himself more.
Nadal is very ignorant if he really said that. If he had his way, he would've made the volley shot illegal. He would've made stepping inside the baseline illegal. Heck, any shot that drops twice inside the baseline would've been made illegal :) Yeah right, Clay court tennis is so eye catching. The days of beautiful tennis are over. Look out for "drills" style tennis moving forward.
There are rumours of an exhibition match between Djokovic and Sampras. It would be great to watch my two favourite players. And by the way Smapras was Djokovic idol. Novak has already said he wants to play that match.So would be great to watch. I hope this match will happen and we can watch it on YouTube.
@locyka19 I'm not so sure about that :) Sampras may have won but it was an exhibition. Roger didn't care, he had taken two matches already. I suspect he let up a bit and let Sampras win. Also what makes you think Roger was serving at his best? He wasn't. Only at certain times in these 3 matches he deliberately served well. I'm a fan of both :)
lol and you are spreading hatred about one statement nadal made? not everybody loves the serve and volley play, why don't you respect other people's opinions, this has nothing to do with being arrogant. nadal is a great sportsman and so is roger federer and pete sampras and they all respect each other. so put down you hater glasses, relax and just enjoy the game lol
they r both players with style, check the backhand, just like ivan Lendl's backhand and forehand, these 3 are the best and most stylish players in my opinion : 1)Pete Sampras 2)Roger Federer 3) ivan Lendl ............
who is better?hm,i think it's tough to copare because of different styles.but here are the facts.sampras maybe haded tougher generation '70-72 with andre,goran,chang,krajicek...but generation of '76'77 players like kuerten,moya,norman,p'poussis..weren't that good. federer was maybe too good for jhis own generation:roddick,nalbandian.davydenko...while '86'87 generation with nadal,djokovic,murray,del po is much better than '76'77 gen. so...yeah it's tough altough fed has more variety then sampras.
"to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve"
Annoying. Overrated. Arrogant. Arrogant fans. sucks Nadal
@AkMachx things always evolve. not limited to sports. the state of the current tennis. All surfaces have slowed. ball became heavy, too. The racket improves, too. This is opposite to Sampras fast surface age. Do you say that you are right based on what? is nadal able to win in fast grass of the Sampras age?
@AkMachx Roger Federer always respects Pete and a past legend player. Novak Djokovic said that he wanted to become Sampras before. Federer's generation players never look down on past players. It is modesty and all respect, for made the history players.
@overratednadal Nadal really said that? Shame if it's right. If Nadal had played Wimbledon in the nineties, it would surely have been more difficult for him. I was really amazed the first time Nadal won Wimbledon. In the nineties, how could a baseline player have been so good on grass?
@wizzie47 If nadal only had the 90's racquets technology to play with he wouldn't even be able to compete back then. His style is very good with the new racquets, but on a very fast surface he drops the ball short and gets pushed back very easily. Wimbledon was slowed down in early 2000's to increase rally length.
@overratednadal I would like to see more volleying today, but I do agree that tennis today overall is more exciting. I think Agassi was the guy who transcended all of that, Federer in his early prime did as well. However, tennis today is classified more as a sport, whereas there was definitely more of a "game," or an "art" in tennis when guys like Laver, Kramer, and Nastase dominated up until Sampras' heyday.
@overratednadal Why u mention Nadal on a Sampras versus Federer vid? Why do people mention any other player when the vid isnt even about them? They all great players why people dont see that. People should just comment about the match thats why youtube made it.
@overratednadal Because of the type of tennis Pete plays, he could still play so well at 37, and could even now. Imagine Nadal running like a yard dog on the baseline at age 37, just imagine. That would be eye catching, no? :)
@overratednadal while i am a big sampras fan...nadal has the right to have an opinion. he grew up in spain, which is all about clay, so it's understandable why he doesn't enjoy serve and volley and why he enjoys rallies
LOL. Arrogant blind asshole fan of Nadal. Say something. Insult to players in the past of Nadal. Arrogant cheaters of Nadal. Time-out of fake always. take time of fake alwys. Nadal's criticism to Djokovic's pleasure. sucks Nadal and Nadal's fan
I love Rafa Nadal. He is the classic greatest. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
young ones these days say that roger has always been and will always be the biggest legend of tennis. none of these people have seen sampras at his prime, this was made about 20 years after his best plays. it is very plain that the greatest tennis player of all time is between borg and sampras.
how is the person looking down on players when he just states his opinions about not enjoying them personally ? as i mentioned, i do not agree with his statements, but he has every right to state them , and he does not mean it in any disrespectful manner. in fact, he has a picture with rafter of all people where he states him to be one of the champion players of his time. most tennis players today ( and definitely the top 3) are very respectful of each other, and past players.
Nadal said. " to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet.
It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve. " Nadal always looks down past players. Arrogant Nadal.
@overratednadal Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)..Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)...
Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@overratednadal ,if you quoted the ENTIRE THING, you'd help others notice he says that they aren't better, but ''In His Opinion' today's matches are more fun to watch cause there are more rallies and longer tighter points than the overpowering short serve and volley games of those mentioned players .Sampras is my favorite player of all time , but Nadal's just speaking his mind and he has every right to do so .tons of people would agree with him , tons would not. he is NOT looking down on anyone
@beastmry quoted entire. Nadal said. " Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve. " Nadal always looks down on past players. arrogant Nadal
Roger Federer's racket is actually 88 sq inches and the one sold in stores is 93 sq inches. Roger also uses a different string pattern. the main strings are spread farther apart for more spin. Look it up if you don't believe me. He's the GOAT at cheating.
@thisislaser How can you cheat at a competitive sport where the same rules apply to everyone. Not to be pedantic but the rules obviously states that you can use these rackets otherwise they wouldn't be using them. The only person who has a problem with this is you and maybe Steve who lives in that insane asylum down that street... you know the street i'm talking about one... how can I describe it... the one where your mum is advertising her who-ha.
@unholyjebus Normal players use store bought shit rackets and top players use their money to build great equipment. You call that fair. Without money from their rich parents they're nothing.
@thisislaser I do semi agree with you that players from a rich background have an advantage but to go as far to say that they cheated, no. If a dad payed for there child's university expenses, dose it mean the kid cheated. The kid still has to work hard to achieve good grades. Besides, ever heard of the Williams sisters who had a rather modest upbringing.
@thisislaser naw equipment is about 1% of the sucess equation. jimmy conners won many majors 10 ithink, with a dime store racket, wilson t 2000. about 30/40/bucks at the time. and tennis shoes are tennis shoes. maybe the rich kids get better training at a young age. thats it ..novak use to play on the bottom of a swimming pool comming up. the williams girls were taught by there dad on the courts of compton. conners grew up in east st. louis ( not a fancy place) petes folks scrapped to get going
lol Why is everyone saying Nadal this, Federer that, Sampras is arrogant, blah-blah-blah. Arrogant or not, these guys are ALL great players. They've all accomplished a lot, even if Fed's won more Grand Slams...
Nadal said. "Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis. " Arrogant Nadal . sucks.
always cheaters in the game. Illegal coaching, always fake time-outs, always annoying. always exceding time limit between serves, always gamemanship, mindgames, and spitting in the clay. etc. etc. etc.
annoying. arrogant. overrated. arrogant fan. sucks Nadal
@overratednadal Hey i must say , if that's the kinda comment Nadal can honestly say regarding the extraordinary commitment and dedication from tennis players of this level (Sampras, Goran) he will never be in their class! Ok ? its the fact that he says this was not tennis? It was and they didn't have the luxuries of injections etc etc.. If tennis was the xmen Nadal is Angry Eric and Roger fed is Charles. elegant and powerful
@KIWI897 LOL yes. nadal fan = stupid arrogant blind. Nadal always look down past players. " Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis. " sucks arrogant Nadal.Nadal.
always cheaters in the game. Illegal coaching, always fake time-outs, always annoying. always exceding time limit between serves, always ugly gamemanship. always fake injury. annoying. overrated. arrogant. sucks
Pete Sampras was just an incredible serve and volleyer. Skill wise I would give roger the edge. His foot work is still amazing even though he might be slowing down. If roger and pete met in their prime on all 4 surfaces i think it would be a 2-2 tie with pete taking a hard court and a grass court match. and a hard court match and clay match. i love both these guys, genuine, humble and just a pleasure to watch
funny to see al Rogerfanboys voting negatively for any little critic on their "god". If my comments is being hidden due to negative votes, they admit that it's true what I say.
Roger's fanbase is the most indoctrinated mass, which does not accept any other opinon, totally intolerant and disgusting.
@overratednadal I dont think that was meant as an arrogant statement, but rather focused on the duel of "acers". Actually, he is right... to see a match where both players progress with aces only, is not "enjoyable". I rather find it quite common to hear arrogant sentences by Federer...like the one JUST yesterday. He said: "Wimbledon is not going to be won by a new player, but only me or Nadal". And today He got kicked his ass by Tsonga. That was actually ENJOYABLE :D
@PatagonianWarrior nadal said. "Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis." Arrogant comment. If Roger says this? do you write the same thing. Shame. asshole
@PatagonianWarrior Roger's interview was modest. “I think my game was plenty good enough this year to win the tournament, but unfortunately there’s only one who can win it, and the rest go home empty-handed,” “That’s what happened to me today, but Jo played an amazing match. great game to both.” very humble Roger. And, class act, when game end. too
@DoctorDoomsday1 Clay is by far his weakest surface. What on Earth are you talking about? I can guarantee you that even if the Wimbledon courts were significantly slower today (which they're not really)nhe would have still won 7 titles. Absolutely guarantee it.
@DoctorDoomsday1 What? Oh my God... are you being serious? He lost to Tim Henman when he hadn't won any Grand Slam titles before. When he wasn't good enough to win them. This was when he was like 12th in the world or something. Since then, he can defeat anyone on grass. Literally anyone. Between 2003 and 2008, he literally never lost. And you say this is due to him requesting slightly slower courts? Wow. You sir, need to show some respect to Federer because you're talking crap just now.
@DoctorDoomsday1 Are you serious? Federer is the best all round best tennis player and experts agree with that. If he had suggested faster courts, you would be accusing him of giving himself an advantage in another aspect of his game.
@DoctorDoomsday1 What are you speaking? Roger is a 5 time champion of the US open. 5th straight victory.
Moreover, Roger has the successive victories record of the hard court. The following record of Djokovic today. Both are records that are longer than Sampras. Roger is a great player. on the fast court and slow court.
@federerbestclass Roger played in the water down era thats how he got to 16 in the first place.Federer could not even beat a 37 year old Sampras here.
@federerbestclass Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)
@federerbestclass Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
2 Greats. Both at their peaks i think pete would have had the edge on grass. Perhaps Roger would have the edge on clay and perhaps even on hard. Unfortunately we'll never know, bit like Senna vs Schumacher in F1. Both awesome serves, although Sampras i think has the best serve of all time. Not the quickest but he could place the ball anywhere he wanted.
lmao at people thinking this was a ligit match... federer was not playing in full mode. i mean sampras played hewitt recently in an exhibition and hewitt thrased him 6-2,6-2 or something and on the tour federer demolishes hewitt. sampras still plays well but he couldnt compete on tour at his age.
@thisislaser the head to head may suggest that but most of their matches were very competetive, most matches going three sets and many tie breaks.. and rafter beat him where it mattered... us open semi final in 1998
@AceGuitarR7 At the same time Federer would not want to be humiliated to a guy who retired 10 years ago. Federer probably had more trouble returning Sampras' serve than anyone on tour at the moment. As you know 'ace' Guitar - tennis is ALL about holding serve :)
@khale4nia yeh, i actaually think sampras serve now would still be among the best. the thing that would let him down is fitness. being able to back it up and win 8 matches in a row is very demanding.
@superman11978 Yeah, and you would probably not return one single of those serves "Superman"..Sampras would beat you playing from a wheelchair without wheels....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@fedbestclassisgay Get a pseudo, get some friends, get a live. Also, I really don't think Federer is gay.. Or maybe you're wanting him to ? Like Freud said.. You're a real gay so (=
To say Roger didnt try is just silly. If your an athlete in front of an audience you try, its what your born to do. Fed ran after alot of balls hard. If you want to say that Rogers mental game wasnt 100% because it was an exibihtion match, i would agree. In a real match perhaps he could have dug deeper and beaten retired Sampras. He has done it before, he just had an off night. Great play by both!
Federer's more than just volleying, even with rafter, lendl, borg, the level of competition from today requires a lot more strenght, physical and foot work, and federer dominates it.
It's interesting.I don't think this match is 100% serious after saw Sampras doing that trick but it shows many things and facts...for example Federer is in a little trouble when he has to play with a serve and volleyer....Sampras is one of the best s&v-er and Federer dominates mostly baseliners.
by watching this vid in this resolution, everone looses with federer.
jro1985 3 weeks ago
federer really doesn't take exos seriously
keili1212 1 month ago
Old man Pete taught Federer a lesson, lol.
oplilium 1 month ago
This is a proof that Pete Sampras is a genius, it doesn't matter which age!
serbianpupil 1 month ago
When Ivan Lendl was #1 in the world (1987), he talked about his recent practice sets with Rod Laver. Lendl was in his late 20's and his prime. Laver was in his late 40's and retired. Lendl said that their recent match was 6-3,6-3, which is amazingly close for that kind of age discrepancy. This isn't as much of an age difference, but it kinda makes you wonder how it would have went down if Sampras & Federer played in the same era. Fed's the most complete, ever. Pete's the most imposing, ever.
theatlantean3 2 months ago
@theatlantean3 i disagree with Federer being the most complete player ever. his volleys are not at the level of sampras in his prime
cain2335 2 months ago
theatlantean3 2 months ago
@theatlantean3 well some things here are due to different circumstances, like the spin. Federer produces more spin bc he has luxilon rough in his racquet. on today's grass: sampras. on actual grass: sampras by miles. same with hard courts. and federer barely hits returns that pressure the server. he just chips them back or hits them back and starts the rally. and people did have better volleys than pete did back then, like edberg, johnny mac and pat rafter
cain2335 2 months ago
@cain2335 i don't know, i went back&watched a video of Pete vs. Mac in the 1990 U.S Open, and came to the conclusion that Pete had the best volley, ever. I used to think it was my childhood "heroes", Mac, Edberg, Pat Cash, and Becker who had better volleys. And yes, Rafter had some amazing hands, too. But go back and watch that 1990 U.S Open match between Mac and Pete, or the match between Pete and Roddick in 2002. Those 2 matches sealed my opinion of Sampras being the greatest volleyer, ever.
theatlantean3 2 months ago
@cain2335 Good point on the string though. Had Pete used the same string in the same racquet (like he's doing now), he may have had some more "action" on the ball. But I still think Fed's little chip / slice backhand, mixed with how he comes over the ball on that side (the return when he has time) is far better than Sampras ever had on the backhand side. I'm the same age as Pete and grew up playing the same time, so I'm a big Sampras fan, but I put Federer right there with him on the GOAT list.
theatlantean3 2 months ago
@theatlantean3 i agree with federer's backhand being better, especially how he comes over the ball. sampras did come over it well, but not with the same spin and power. that's partially bc of how fast the courts were back then, and how the ball skidded low and fast. that doesn't happen in todays game; the ball sits up more
cain2335 2 months ago
@cain2335 yeah, the courts have been slowed down quite a bit, but the balls are hit harder. The players today simply go after the ball more with faster swing speed, so even though the court is slower today, the ball is coming at you harder than back when i was competing (80's / 90's). Even my childhood role-model Mats Wilander plays a more aggressive game now than he did back in the 80's. I recently saw him workout when he came into town & he spoke about that very thing.
theatlantean3 2 months ago
@theatlantean3 yep, i remember that about lendl-laver... there's an old utube vid w/ laver vs. connors, amazing stuff- no question rod "the rocket" laver was a beast...
my fav all time (b4 fed) was mac... sampras' volleys were gr8 but no one can deny edberg's volleys... also, i def would not choose those 2 matches to highlight sampras' volleys: 1990 was b4 his prime and 2002 was after
btw folks, this was an EXHIBITION... DID U C SAMPRAS' TWEENER SHOT??? this "match" is not real
mephatboi 2 months ago
really u think fed playing the best he let sampras win
Marijuana645 2 months ago
@Marijuana645 Fed was trying harder than Sampras, but Sampras was just too good that day.
oplilium 2 months ago
Sampras vs Nadal
The Grass GOAT vs The Clay GOAT
Lmfao. Jk. Unless it's on clay, Sampras would make Nadal his bitch.
JakeGold14 3 months ago
did anyone see sampras hit his own balls
binladencansukmy 4 months ago
I'd love to see an exhibition match between Djokovic and Sampras, the two greatest of all time.
thisislaser 4 months ago
@thisislaser djokovic greatest of all time? i mean he's world no.1 at the moment but i say give him more time to earn that title yeah?
patryklau 3 months ago
@thisislaser Greatest of all time with 4 slams... hahaha you're funny dude
Eternalover78 3 months ago
pete sempras?
dmh091 4 months ago
Some just need to calm down. There is no way that you can say Federer is better than Sampras or if Sampras is better than Federer. These two never got to play each other when they were both in their prime. You can speculate, but you will never know who would have beaten who.
SiaWinsi 4 months ago
pete was right on his comments the other day....part of his retirement from tennis was because he felt he had nothing else to prove...he was right on...pete is a true champion and a legend just like federer is....both of them are amazing !i like nadal very much but he has to prove himself more.
cek128 4 months ago
greatest Roger and Pete. love both. this great game of Sampras. Roger was tired. But, Roger is a looking good :)
federerbestclass 4 months ago 13
sampras 90s > federer
andunusblick 4 months ago 2
@andunusblick Roger Federer >>> Sampras
sportstennis1 4 months ago
Nadal is very ignorant if he really said that. If he had his way, he would've made the volley shot illegal. He would've made stepping inside the baseline illegal. Heck, any shot that drops twice inside the baseline would've been made illegal :) Yeah right, Clay court tennis is so eye catching. The days of beautiful tennis are over. Look out for "drills" style tennis moving forward.
qzpmwxonqzpm 4 months ago
There are rumours of an exhibition match between Djokovic and Sampras. It would be great to watch my two favourite players. And by the way Smapras was Djokovic idol. Novak has already said he wants to play that match.So would be great to watch. I hope this match will happen and we can watch it on YouTube.
2millionlightyears 5 months ago
Shows in a nutshell what'd have happened if these two meet at the USO back in 2001. I mean a good serving Sampras beats even prime Federer.
locyka19 5 months ago
@locyka19 I'm not so sure about that :) Sampras may have won but it was an exhibition. Roger didn't care, he had taken two matches already. I suspect he let up a bit and let Sampras win. Also what makes you think Roger was serving at his best? He wasn't. Only at certain times in these 3 matches he deliberately served well. I'm a fan of both :)
qzpmwxonqzpm 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol and you are spreading hatred about one statement nadal made? not everybody loves the serve and volley play, why don't you respect other people's opinions, this has nothing to do with being arrogant. nadal is a great sportsman and so is roger federer and pete sampras and they all respect each other. so put down you hater glasses, relax and just enjoy the game lol
Cairono 6 months ago
Looks like Federer's playing about 65% here...
Chazfazzer 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
they r both players with style, check the backhand, just like ivan Lendl's backhand and forehand, these 3 are the best and most stylish players in my opinion : 1)Pete Sampras 2)Roger Federer 3) ivan Lendl ............
420League 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who is better?hm,i think it's tough to copare because of different styles.but here are the facts.sampras maybe haded tougher generation '70-72 with andre,goran,chang,krajicek...but generation of '76'77 players like kuerten,moya,norman,p'poussis..weren't that good. federer was maybe too good for jhis own generation:roddick,nalbandian.davydenko...while '86'87 generation with nadal,djokovic,murray,del po is much better than '76'77 gen. so...yeah it's tough altough fed has more variety then sampras.
TheDobardecko 7 months ago
Nadal always looks down past players.
"to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve"
Annoying. Overrated. Arrogant. Arrogant fans. sucks Nadal
overratednadal 7 months ago 32
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal He is ABSOLUTELY right.... wtf how can you compare the old tennis with the modern one?
If you watch an old match after a modern djokovic vs federer... you'll think that is a slow motion gameplay too...
come one everyone could play that tennis... to play modern tennis nowadays, you need to be a REAL COMPLETE ATHLETE.
Face it... that's the truth.
If you miss old days... that's a different thing.
AkMachx 7 months ago
@AkMachx things always evolve. not limited to sports. the state of the current tennis. All surfaces have slowed. ball became heavy, too. The racket improves, too. This is opposite to Sampras fast surface age. Do you say that you are right based on what? is nadal able to win in fast grass of the Sampras age?
overratednadal 7 months ago
@AkMachx Roger Federer always respects Pete and a past legend player. Novak Djokovic said that he wanted to become Sampras before. Federer's generation players never look down on past players. It is modesty and all respect, for made the history players.
overratednadal 7 months ago
@AkMachx
You obviously don't know much about tennis!
nicodougy 6 months ago
@overratednadal Who said this? Nadal??
Pundit2k 6 months ago
@overratednadal Nadal really said that? Shame if it's right. If Nadal had played Wimbledon in the nineties, it would surely have been more difficult for him. I was really amazed the first time Nadal won Wimbledon. In the nineties, how could a baseline player have been so good on grass?
wizzie47 5 months ago
@wizzie47 If nadal only had the 90's racquets technology to play with he wouldn't even be able to compete back then. His style is very good with the new racquets, but on a very fast surface he drops the ball short and gets pushed back very easily. Wimbledon was slowed down in early 2000's to increase rally length.
fedex19912000 5 months ago
Comment removed
ox092 5 months ago
@overratednadal I would like to see more volleying today, but I do agree that tennis today overall is more exciting. I think Agassi was the guy who transcended all of that, Federer in his early prime did as well. However, tennis today is classified more as a sport, whereas there was definitely more of a "game," or an "art" in tennis when guys like Laver, Kramer, and Nastase dominated up until Sampras' heyday.
theatlantisrise 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal Why u mention Nadal on a Sampras versus Federer vid? Why do people mention any other player when the vid isnt even about them? They all great players why people dont see that. People should just comment about the match thats why youtube made it.
agentyarred 5 months ago
@overratednadal Because of the type of tennis Pete plays, he could still play so well at 37, and could even now. Imagine Nadal running like a yard dog on the baseline at age 37, just imagine. That would be eye catching, no? :)
qzpmwxonqzpm 4 months ago
@overratednadal while i am a big sampras fan...nadal has the right to have an opinion. he grew up in spain, which is all about clay, so it's understandable why he doesn't enjoy serve and volley and why he enjoys rallies
cain2335 3 months ago
@overratednadal
did he really say that ? It makes me hate him even more
69wiwi69 2 months ago
LOL. Arrogant blind asshole fan of Nadal. Say something. Insult to players in the past of Nadal. Arrogant cheaters of Nadal. Time-out of fake always. take time of fake alwys. Nadal's criticism to Djokovic's pleasure. sucks Nadal and Nadal's fan
overratednadal 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal You have terrible grammar, next time learn the language before you use it.
templetonbob 7 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 7 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 7 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 7 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 7 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 7 months ago
I love Rafa Nadal. He is the classic greatest. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
lOoOoOoOvE UUU federer & sampras...the best players ever i saw ^^
zaky092 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
zaky092 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
young ones these days say that roger has always been and will always be the biggest legend of tennis. none of these people have seen sampras at his prime, this was made about 20 years after his best plays. it is very plain that the greatest tennis player of all time is between borg and sampras.
egrilshlavey 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how is the person looking down on players when he just states his opinions about not enjoying them personally ? as i mentioned, i do not agree with his statements, but he has every right to state them , and he does not mean it in any disrespectful manner. in fact, he has a picture with rafter of all people where he states him to be one of the champion players of his time. most tennis players today ( and definitely the top 3) are very respectful of each other, and past players.
beastmry 7 months ago
Nadal said. " to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet.
It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve. " Nadal always looks down past players. Arrogant Nadal.
overratednadal 7 months ago
@overratednadal where did you find that quote?
rmsprowler 7 months ago
@rmsprowler It was on the ATP website a few weeks ago. You can probably find it in the archives.
3timeMVPNash 7 months ago
@overratednadal BAD ENGLISH!
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)..Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)...
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@overratednadal ,if you quoted the ENTIRE THING, you'd help others notice he says that they aren't better, but ''In His Opinion' today's matches are more fun to watch cause there are more rallies and longer tighter points than the overpowering short serve and volley games of those mentioned players .Sampras is my favorite player of all time , but Nadal's just speaking his mind and he has every right to do so .tons of people would agree with him , tons would not. he is NOT looking down on anyone
beastmry 7 months ago
@beastmry quoted entire. Nadal said. " Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match. or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It's not really tennis. it is a few swings of the racquet. It was less eye-catching than what we do now. everyone enjoys the tennis we play much more. I am not saying we are playing better tennis. just more enjoyable tennis. For me in the past it was just serve. serve. serve. " Nadal always looks down on past players. arrogant Nadal
overratednadal 7 months ago
Roger Federer's racket is actually 88 sq inches and the one sold in stores is 93 sq inches. Roger also uses a different string pattern. the main strings are spread farther apart for more spin. Look it up if you don't believe me. He's the GOAT at cheating.
thisislaser 7 months ago
All pro players are over hyped clowns. They have custom built rackets to help them cheat. Oh I'm sooo impressed!!
thisislaser 7 months ago
@thisislaser Can't tell if troll or just stupid
unholyjebus 7 months ago
@unholyjebus You're just another easily manipulated fool. They cheat stupid!
thisislaser 7 months ago
@thisislaser How can you cheat at a competitive sport where the same rules apply to everyone. Not to be pedantic but the rules obviously states that you can use these rackets otherwise they wouldn't be using them. The only person who has a problem with this is you and maybe Steve who lives in that insane asylum down that street... you know the street i'm talking about one... how can I describe it... the one where your mum is advertising her who-ha.
Your argument is invalid.
unholyjebus 7 months ago
@unholyjebus Normal players use store bought shit rackets and top players use their money to build great equipment. You call that fair. Without money from their rich parents they're nothing.
thisislaser 7 months ago
@thisislaser I do semi agree with you that players from a rich background have an advantage but to go as far to say that they cheated, no. If a dad payed for there child's university expenses, dose it mean the kid cheated. The kid still has to work hard to achieve good grades. Besides, ever heard of the Williams sisters who had a rather modest upbringing.
unholyjebus 7 months ago
@unholyjebus True, Williams sisters did earn their achievements.
thisislaser 7 months ago
@thisislaser naw equipment is about 1% of the sucess equation. jimmy conners won many majors 10 ithink, with a dime store racket, wilson t 2000. about 30/40/bucks at the time. and tennis shoes are tennis shoes. maybe the rich kids get better training at a young age. thats it ..novak use to play on the bottom of a swimming pool comming up. the williams girls were taught by there dad on the courts of compton. conners grew up in east st. louis ( not a fancy place) petes folks scrapped to get going
1986billyk 7 months ago
@1986billyk I'm not talking about Connors I mean today's players
thisislaser 7 months ago
And let's not forget the Djoker. xD
Shodai24 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol Why is everyone saying Nadal this, Federer that, Sampras is arrogant, blah-blah-blah. Arrogant or not, these guys are ALL great players. They've all accomplished a lot, even if Fed's won more Grand Slams...
Shodai24 7 months ago
Nadal said. "Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis. " Arrogant Nadal . sucks.
always cheaters in the game. Illegal coaching, always fake time-outs, always annoying. always exceding time limit between serves, always gamemanship, mindgames, and spitting in the clay. etc. etc. etc.
annoying. arrogant. overrated. arrogant fan. sucks Nadal
overratednadal 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal Hey i must say , if that's the kinda comment Nadal can honestly say regarding the extraordinary commitment and dedication from tennis players of this level (Sampras, Goran) he will never be in their class! Ok ? its the fact that he says this was not tennis? It was and they didn't have the luxuries of injections etc etc.. If tennis was the xmen Nadal is Angry Eric and Roger fed is Charles. elegant and powerful
drstew1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@overratednadal Nadal said that? I didn't even know that. I love Nadal but I thought he was humble
KIWI897 7 months ago
@KIWI897 LOL yes. nadal fan = stupid arrogant blind. Nadal always look down past players. " Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis. " sucks arrogant Nadal.Nadal.
always cheaters in the game. Illegal coaching, always fake time-outs, always annoying. always exceding time limit between serves, always ugly gamemanship. always fake injury. annoying. overrated. arrogant. sucks
overratednadal 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pete Sampras was just an incredible serve and volleyer. Skill wise I would give roger the edge. His foot work is still amazing even though he might be slowing down. If roger and pete met in their prime on all 4 surfaces i think it would be a 2-2 tie with pete taking a hard court and a grass court match. and a hard court match and clay match. i love both these guys, genuine, humble and just a pleasure to watch
yucky1336 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
funny to see al Rogerfanboys voting negatively for any little critic on their "god". If my comments is being hidden due to negative votes, they admit that it's true what I say.
Roger's fanbase is the most indoctrinated mass, which does not accept any other opinon, totally intolerant and disgusting.
PatagonianWarrior 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SAMPRAS IS THE KING OF TENNIS! Federer is like the son of Sampras. Anyway everybody knows that Sampras was the best ever tennis player on the planet.
kaviliaidissotiris 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
Greek Pride..
madsouljaz 8 months ago
Comment removed
tennistennisful 8 months ago
Comment removed
tennistennisful 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago 26
@overratednadal I dont think that was meant as an arrogant statement, but rather focused on the duel of "acers". Actually, he is right... to see a match where both players progress with aces only, is not "enjoyable". I rather find it quite common to hear arrogant sentences by Federer...like the one JUST yesterday. He said: "Wimbledon is not going to be won by a new player, but only me or Nadal". And today He got kicked his ass by Tsonga. That was actually ENJOYABLE :D
PatagonianWarrior 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PatagonianWarrior nadal said. "Personally, to watch a Pete Sampras versus Goran Ivanisevic match, or one between those kind of players, is not enjoyable. It is not really tennis." Arrogant comment. If Roger says this? do you write the same thing. Shame. asshole
overratednadal 8 months ago
@PatagonianWarrior Roger's interview was modest. “I think my game was plenty good enough this year to win the tournament, but unfortunately there’s only one who can win it, and the rest go home empty-handed,” “That’s what happened to me today, but Jo played an amazing match. great game to both.” very humble Roger. And, class act, when game end. too
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago
Comment removed
overratednadal 8 months ago 23
@DoctorDoomsday1 Clay is by far his weakest surface. What on Earth are you talking about? I can guarantee you that even if the Wimbledon courts were significantly slower today (which they're not really)nhe would have still won 7 titles. Absolutely guarantee it.
lollerz16 8 months ago
@DoctorDoomsday1 What? Oh my God... are you being serious? He lost to Tim Henman when he hadn't won any Grand Slam titles before. When he wasn't good enough to win them. This was when he was like 12th in the world or something. Since then, he can defeat anyone on grass. Literally anyone. Between 2003 and 2008, he literally never lost. And you say this is due to him requesting slightly slower courts? Wow. You sir, need to show some respect to Federer because you're talking crap just now.
lollerz16 8 months ago
@DoctorDoomsday1 Are you serious? Federer is the best all round best tennis player and experts agree with that. If he had suggested faster courts, you would be accusing him of giving himself an advantage in another aspect of his game.
lollerz16 8 months ago
2:51 best !
creofly 8 months ago
@DoctorDoomsday1 What are you speaking? Roger is a 5 time champion of the US open. 5th straight victory.
Moreover, Roger has the successive victories record of the hard court. The following record of Djokovic today. Both are records that are longer than Sampras. Roger is a great player. on the fast court and slow court.
federerbestclass 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@federerbestclass Roger played in the water down era thats how he got to 16 in the first place.Federer could not even beat a 37 year old Sampras here.
1. Nadal
2. Sampras
LittleVinnyCock 8 months ago
federer vs sampras when both were in there prime at wimbledon = greatest match of all time!!
crombot77 8 months ago
Greatest Roger and Pete. love both. This great game of Pete. Roger is tired. but, Roger looking good :)
federerbestclass 8 months ago 54
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@federerbestclass
Nalbandian love. class.
dmh091 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@federerbestclass You are somehow always top comment!
Denoheatwave 8 months ago
@federerbestclass Nadal was so tired. He was injured and sickness and MONO and SLUMP of head, arm, ankle, stomach, brain, eyes, elbow, celulitis, fingers, liver, bowels, boob implants, nose surgery, wrist, nails, etc. Classy. love Rafa:)
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@federerbestclass Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class. Love Rafa. Class.
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I LOVE RAFA NADAL. HE IS THE CLASSIC GREATEST. END. LOVE. CLASS
federerbestcIass 7 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 8 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 8 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 8 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 8 months ago
@DoctorDoomsday1 Sampras is a really great player. However, he is a bad clay court player. too bad slow court player. sorry.
federerbestclass 8 months ago 4
2 Greats. Both at their peaks i think pete would have had the edge on grass. Perhaps Roger would have the edge on clay and perhaps even on hard. Unfortunately we'll never know, bit like Senna vs Schumacher in F1. Both awesome serves, although Sampras i think has the best serve of all time. Not the quickest but he could place the ball anywhere he wanted.
alanbubb 8 months ago
why do I get the feeling that, the entire chinese audience didn't understand how tennis even worked...
futuramaishot 8 months ago
Since Federer started fucking about with Sampras..he started loosing on the tour...
symba 9 months ago
@symba Yes, I think losing to Sampras on his private court and on having these close matches on tour made him realize he's not that great lol
khale4nia 8 months ago
Sampras will always be my fav.
he would be an awesome coach!
cs512tr 9 months ago
lmao at people thinking this was a ligit match... federer was not playing in full mode. i mean sampras played hewitt recently in an exhibition and hewitt thrased him 6-2,6-2 or something and on the tour federer demolishes hewitt. sampras still plays well but he couldnt compete on tour at his age.
AceGuitarR7 9 months ago
@AceGuitarR7 Rafter dominated Federer and Sampras dominated Rafter!
thisislaser 9 months ago
@thisislaser the head to head may suggest that but most of their matches were very competetive, most matches going three sets and many tie breaks.. and rafter beat him where it mattered... us open semi final in 1998
AceGuitarR7 9 months ago
@AceGuitarR7 At the same time Federer would not want to be humiliated to a guy who retired 10 years ago. Federer probably had more trouble returning Sampras' serve than anyone on tour at the moment. As you know 'ace' Guitar - tennis is ALL about holding serve :)
khale4nia 8 months ago
@khale4nia yeh, i actaually think sampras serve now would still be among the best. the thing that would let him down is fitness. being able to back it up and win 8 matches in a row is very demanding.
AceGuitarR7 8 months ago
Pete and Roger should play now. Roger is an old man now too.
thisislaser 10 months ago
Pete beats Federer? Er, more like Federer lets Sampras win because he feels sorry for the old geezer. Notice how Federer rolls every serve in.
superman11978 10 months ago
@superman11978 Yeah, and you would probably not return one single of those serves "Superman"..Sampras would beat you playing from a wheelchair without wheels....
rorikjunior 9 months ago
@rorikjunior i believe that is just called a chair
MrPhilsd 9 months ago
@MrPhilsd That depends..a "normal" chair I reckon would be more comfortable to use...but you get my point
rorikjunior 9 months ago
sampras my greek boy!
lakis83 11 months ago
Novak Djokovic is the best now :D
mrnixon12311 11 months ago
@mrnixon12311 he may be the best on tour now but federer is definately the best player of all tiem! the most all rounded player
dancingworms001 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@fedbestclassisgay Get a pseudo, get some friends, get a live. Also, I really don't think Federer is gay.. Or maybe you're wanting him to ? Like Freud said.. You're a real gay so (=
MrFedXpress 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 11 months ago
The two greatest players of all time IMO.
sdnm86 1 year ago 65
@sdnm86 Bud its not just your Opinion. You are 100% correct. Records prove it. Not the mention the hearts !!!
spacyfoil 8 months ago
To say Roger didnt try is just silly. If your an athlete in front of an audience you try, its what your born to do. Fed ran after alot of balls hard. If you want to say that Rogers mental game wasnt 100% because it was an exibihtion match, i would agree. In a real match perhaps he could have dug deeper and beaten retired Sampras. He has done it before, he just had an off night. Great play by both!
Kolran 1 year ago
@nielslennartohlsen lol it means that it's an exhibition and it's just for entertainment!
honestyize 1 year ago
Comment removed
tennislife100 1 year ago 23
LOVING 2:50
simpleng22756 1 year ago
Thumbs up or thumps down or both if you think MrFedExpress is a total clown :)
1BGhimire 1 year ago
Federer is serving like Chris Evert in this match XD he's taking sooo much off it lol. still, Pete did play super well so that's nice to see.
Aaronthegreatest 1 year ago
Pete beat Roger with his own racket.
thisislaser 1 year ago
roger did a little nadal move at 1:09 x]
calvinluu333 1 year ago
@calvinluu333 agreed. it appeared to have that nadal swish to it :)
sdn14 1 year ago
pete seems an active player....genious!
pablotjob 1 year ago
They have like the same type of game.
gwfactions2 1 year ago
Federer's more than just volleying, even with rafter, lendl, borg, the level of competition from today requires a lot more strenght, physical and foot work, and federer dominates it.
DEtonadosPKMN 1 year ago
Federer never play 100% guys its only a show match
Sampras would go down with the age of 36
Deeennisteeennis 1 year ago
It's interesting.I don't think this match is 100% serious after saw Sampras doing that trick but it shows many things and facts...for example Federer is in a little trouble when he has to play with a serve and volleyer....Sampras is one of the best s&v-er and Federer dominates mostly baseliners.
Thetennislover19 1 year ago
0:44 - 0:55, Slice it Guys! nice!
no1devendra777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you guys are all idiots for thinking that they both gave 100% in this match. it was predetermined beforehand that sampras would win.
federer would have smoked him if he tried.
brawlaccount 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you are all idiots for thinking that they both gave 100% in this match. it was predetermined beforehand that sampras would win.
if federer tried it wouldnt have been close.
brawlaccount 1 year ago