the M3 can eat my 135s nutts my 135 is completely stock with nothing on it out side of what the dealer has on it and i RAPE M3s left and right i havent come across any car that i havent been able to take so far, that is considered an everyday car all you fan boys are just pissed because you have no individuality and didnt think for you selves instead you hopped on the M3 band wagon and got your self an M3 the 135i is better than an M3 in EVERY way get over it your car is no longer top dog.
@vatan1923 are you tarded? The m3 ran exactly what it should have! The 135 has tune+meth+slicks that's why he ran 11.5! Every time I see a an m3 getting beaten all the fan boys come unglued and start ranting about the superiority of the m3. He fucking lost to a car that when new literary cost half as much!
id rather take the M3, its bigger, sounds nice ass hell can't deny that, its fast as well, and in consumer ratings the M3 through out the period of time has way less issues and complaints than the 135i and 335i, BUT! if you like smaller, compact, are going to lease, and primarily just don't give a F*** get the 135i lol, i like them both but if your riding an M3 thats a way more sexier car than both the 1 & 3 series and a Panty-Dropper if i might add.
yeah, i own a 135i and have taken plenty M3's. But down at coast line, i wouldn't try. The advantage of the 135i away from the coast is the twin turbo and hence the air intakes which allows for better air flow.
I don't think people buy a 335i and mod it just to compete with the E9x M3. I think they just want the full potential from a great engine.
I'm sure the M3 is a great car, but I couldn't justify to myself paying an extra £20K, paying 3x more per year to keep the warranty going, more for insurance and double for a service. I want great performance for as little money as poss and drive a top quality car.
I love modding and there's more to be done with a non NA car..
some people are just dumb...stock vs modded...how about a modded 650 hp m3 vs a modded 450 335? I seen it...and the M3 eats it and shits it out. How you going to race a modded car vs a stock car? 335 and 135 owners try to make their cars faster to race THE KING of the track..the m3...remember that. you mod your cars to be faster then the car YOU ALL WISH you can drive. hahahah
@Goguha its all about torque. My 335 made over 400 pound feet of tq through the power band as you well know that's more than 100 lbft more than the m3. Maybe that's why the new m3 is going to be a twin turbo variant of the n54. I now have a 2010 135i with down pipes tune lsd fmic and air filters I have run 12.2@111 with a 1.8 60 ft on street tires. The car in this video has all the modds my car plus drag radials meth and prob race gas. Not to mention the car he is racing is the slower manual
none of this matters on windy roads... what the m3 lacks in straightaway power it makes up on turns(no im not biased i drive a e92 335i)... the n54 engine redlines at 7k rpm while the m3's engine redlines at 8500k combine that with the m suspension,brakes,tranny, and lsd... the m3 kills the 135i. unless off course u give the 135 all those m parts... o right they did its called the 1m lol...
Both v good cars but the 35i does have a good tuning potential. Is it possible to buy a better after-market fuel pump for the 35 to overcome the widespread issues the stock BMW fuel pump suffers? This is the main concern after reading all the problems the 35i suffers with it's fuel pump.
The 135i is a perfect powerplant to play with, the horsepower possibilities seem endless, this is where I think BMW starts to get the numbers right. The1 series in general is a good starting point for whatever somebody wants, its fast, small, lighter then adding 2 turbos to it make it a serious contender...
What the hell? Many pages of speculation about 135i vs M3 power advantages and launching styles? All you have see is the comment from 135i owner to see that it's heavily modified. 11.58 is way faster than a stock 135i, and 13.3s is a basic time for a stock M3.
@rajvosa71000 Well, I'm not a Bimmer guy (I'm a VAG guy). Judging by the name of the car.. the number behind the first number behind the first one is usually the literage.. 1= Series, 35= 3.5
@VolkswagOwned I don't know how you got that information. somehow I ve heard that it is the torque that makes that last two digits. however, it is not 100% precise. put it this way, 325i, 328i, 330i,335i have been running and made better one after each particular model, but neither their torque nor their "literage" or displacement would just remain what they were 5 years ago or 10 years ago. 328i's displacement is not 2.80L. just FYI. peace.
I love the people that are completely oblivious about what an m3 should run at a strip...low 12s or less ROFL. GTFO idiot...m3's were made for the twistys anyways brah...
EIther the M3 missed a shift or the guy wasn't even trying. The 1 is a beautiful car, but even with racing slicks and a cat-back exhaust, an E92 would beat it in a fair fight.
@moselyliver Lol...the M3 didn't missed a stift or anything like that. Running low 13's is very common, in a stock M3. That 135i is my car. I was driving it. It has a tune, intake, FMIC, exhaust, methanol kit and a small shot of nitrous. My best ET was 11.35@125mph.
@MrVinceLang Isn't the video enough to show that the 135i obviously accelerated faster? If both cars were stock the M3 would probably take it on the top end, but the 135 is still lighter and accelerates better in my opinion. Every car is different in real life though and different drivers as well.
@Jesse22H M3 E92 DCT does 0-60 in 3.9 (C&D), same as CTS-V (CTS-V does pull away 60-90 though, as it should). If a car beat another one this bad. it's more than slight tune (heavy tune, or crap vs good driver). i135 DCT does ~4.5 (C&D). I have never lost to any i135 stock or modified (with ~390hp and DCT it will match the M3 DCT). Other outcome is due to better/worse drivers. Newtons laws are still at work ... And to 'slaughter' the M3 u better have 500hp+ (or add $20 to M3 and get 675hp).
@goguhu thats such bullshit! i raced my friends e92 m3 all the time with 08 335i with a jb4 fmic and intakes and walked him every time from a dig or a roll. he jumped 1.5 cars on the launch but by the middle of 3rd i would come around, and from a roll i would quickly begin to pull on him. (thats with stock exhaust) the car in this video is full bolt on+meth(hence the 11.58sec) quit buying magazines and buy a bmw.
@myjeepsbigger3 Well then your friend does not know how to race. I have a E92 M3 myself (as well as a E46 M3, E36 M3, E36 325i M-tech, and a couple of bikes). If you beat a car with better hp/lb it's all due to you, and not the car. With JB4 you have ~380hp or so I guess (unless you have done a lot more). Look at just the torque curve, and you should understand why a turbo engine, even if it generate same peak power, can't keep up with the M3.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have several BMW's (3 are M3's). Anyhow, I'm just a fan of Isaac Newton and even if I try to break the law of physics, I still fail 100% of the time. Even with same peak hp as the M3 (given the weight are even, and at sub 100mph, the wider body of M3 won't really impact the drag/air resistance too much), there is not way with similar drivers the 335 will beat the M3. Just look at the torque curve ... M3 - flat like a table top 1500-8000, fall off the cliff at 5500-6500.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have several BMW's (3 are M3's). Anyhow, I'm just a fan of Isaac Newton and even if I try to break the law of physics, I still fail 100% of the time. Even with same peak hp as the M3 (given the weight are even, and at sub 100mph, the wider body of M3 won't really impact the drag/air resistance too much), there is not way with similar drivers the 335 will beat the M3. Just look at the torque curve ... M3 - flat like a table top 1500-8000, fall off the cliff at 5500-6500.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
@myjeepsbigger3 I do understand you want your car to be fast-er/st, but you need to understand that unless your car is 25% better off, the driver matter much more ... I beat a ZR1 in a Cobalt rental ... does not make the Cobalt faster ... made me faster. I have also beaten 911 Turbo on mountain roads with a Intrepid ... again, not the car, the driver.
@myjeepsbigger3 I have beaten ZR1 with Golf GTI (red light), 911 Turbo with Dodge Intrepid(mountain roads) and Ford F-150 with M3 (gravel road). In neither of these cases it was due to the car ... it was all about the driver (not me being the best, but the other being horrible). I do understand you want your car to beat M3 (why you got 335 and modded it in the first place), but you need 10-20% better hp/lb ratio than the M3 to beat it due to the poor torque curve on TT engines.
@goguhu are you DUMB BRO? poor torque curve on 135???? it's 300lb stock kicks in at 1500rpm and carries on until 6.5k rpm...... DUDE it's n54 the smooth tq engine we're talking about here... everyone knows n54 spanks the m3 on straight lines from a deadstop. it's called jb4 + downpipes
@BeybladeGeeks Everybody having a x35i think so ... reality is reality ... when you wake up perhaps you can come back as well ...
M3 : 92%+ of torque over 70%+ of rev band
35i : 90%+ of torque over 32% of rev band ... that's not flat ... that's pathetic ... or rather ... how turbo works, and why people LOVE NA ... (however you can get more peak torque ... and sooner or later it's hard to compete)
At least spend some time looking at dyno chart before you make a fool out of yourself.
@goguhu "35i : 90%+ of torque over 32% of rev band" I've just been looking at my torque curve for my 335i N54 and your 32% doesn't stack up. It's more like 82% Max: 344 ft/lb 90% = 309 1500rpm-4500rpm = 340ish 5000rpm = 325 5500rpm = 320 6000rpm = 300 6500rpm = 270 7000rpm = 250 doesn't drop to just below 90% at 5750 rpm 5750 / 7000 = 0.82 Therefore 90% power available for 82% of the rev band
@BobBooker123 I bet you do not have 309tq from 0-1500 rpm, but yeah I agree 32% must have been wrong. Looks to be close to 52% (so I think I typed a 3 when I meant a 5, tx for the correction).
So 90% from 1700 - 5500 (5500 - 1700) / 7200 = 52%
@BeybladeGeeks Any I was talking about stock ... yeah JB4/downpipes cost less than VT-775 ... but if you want to go there ... try your 135i JB4+++++/downpipe/+meatballs for dinner against my VT-775 ... but that was beside the point.
35i (and turbo engines in general) drop of fast after ~85% of rev limit. M3 keeps going all the way to the limit.
No at 5600 torque on 35i take a dive down to 170 at 6800 (225 @ 6500),
@goguhu after owning a MK5 GTI and currently a 135i, I'd agree that after 5.5k RPM's you'd better change gear as you torque drops off dramatically. On my dyno charts (stage 1) torque peaks from 3-4k RPM and then drops off, although power has a steady climb to 6k RPM's before dropping off slightly.
@BeybladeGeeks Read up on Dinan 335i vs E92 M3 and perhaps you learn something about hp/torque ...
"Let me just say, the 335 had more torque, less weight, and just a few horsies short of being even to the M3, and it still lost. It was slower in the 1/4 mile and around the track… "
If you want to learn something search for "DYNO results E92 M3 335i BMW Forum" first link show torque curve overlapped from 335i and M3. Notice how flat M3 is vs 335i, nothing to be ashamed of ... it's reality.
@BeybladeGeeks N54 does not have a smooth tq curve ... even BMW admit to that (look at the gearing on their turbo engines). Same issue with the new M5 F10 (torque drop off at 6000+). N54 drop at 5500. Search for both, and you can look at the curve yourself - it's easier.
... everyone know S65 spanks the 335i on straight lines from a deadstop. it's called ESS VT-775
@myjeepsbigger3 I have 3 already ... might or might not get the M3 F80 next ... well if you tuned your 335 to have 450+ you should beat him ... jb4+ typically give you ~80hp, which bring you to 380 ... but yes keep midding and sooner or later you get into the 450+ ... but I have seen so many M3 lose to stock 335i that I would still say if you win, it's 90% you (driver). "On average the JB+ gives 40hp to the wheels, while the JB4 gives 70-80hp to the wheels, on an otherwise stock car. "
@MrVinceLang Even if the m3 has better acceleration Stock. With a jb2 or jb3 installed the 135i will mop the flour with the m3. The 135 has alot of potential, chipped and bolt on mods even weight 200 pounds lighter. You can easily bring the hp close to 440 and that doesn't include meth injectors and race gas. The downfall of the 135 is the small little turbos they use. Quick to spool, great for acceleration but don't expect larger numbers. transmission unless its a manual or a smg tranny
"135: 5,2 seconds from 0 to 60 miles" - this is a stock figure, with a simple tune it gets around 30% power gain, and being much lighter than M3 it just gets it ;)
@MrVinceLang Technically speaking, those are the times released for 135i and M3, but on a good track with a good driver, I believe a 135i could do 0-100(km/hr) in 5 s. flat, and same goes for an M3, but really what you have to look at when comparing the two is that in terms of performance, you are paying an extra $80K-$100K for 0.01 seconds, of course there is more to cars than straight line time, but for anybody worried about price, M3 does not have a strong case against 135i, just my opinion
@MrVinceLang even if you wrote this long time ago, the 5,2 secs of the 135i isnt correct (bmw almost always says it accelerates slower on any car) normal 135i ~4,9-5,1
You must be kidding? The 135i is obviously chipped. This is a pretty typical outcome.
You see, the 135i is twin turbo, therefore tuning the ECU will enable one to increase the boost of the turbo very easily. This makes it possible to add roughly 100 crank horsepower to any N54 engine (2007-2009 335i, 135i included) for only $700.
View this: /watch?v=d8yq3spqC84
Or just search "chipped 335i 0-60" for some entertainment
135i is on slicks and launched hard (watch it squat). Also likely it has at least a couple of power mods to crank out 11.58. M3 looks like it's on streets and did not launch hard, if at all. Slicks and good launch should put stock M3 into mid/low 12s.
@Saiko908 So, mr saiko... if it is a BMW 135, it is clear even for an ox that it belongs to 1 Series... And if you surf on BMW website you'll find all the answers to your "amazing" questions. If you can put such questions, it means you're very, very rookie in cars. Are you still using a dray, or what?
That 135i just got up and went!! Yeah I think the M3 looks better but for 60k it damn well better! Al though I think the 135i looks great in it's own way.
That is my car...My best run was an 11.35 @ 125mph. Full bolt-on's plus a little bit of nitrous. (25 HP shot.) Without nitrous, my best is 11.62 @ 120mph.
@titifr21 to run an 11.58 in a 135, you'd have to have a pretty aggressive tune. maybe nitrous, but certainly a ton of boost. and that m3 just had a terrible run.
@yumyumluckycharms You can say "Fuck the m3" only when you tuned the 135i, and the driver of the 135i is experienced while the driver of the m3 needs to race more, because that m3 goes over 12seconds.
the M3 can eat my 135s nutts my 135 is completely stock with nothing on it out side of what the dealer has on it and i RAPE M3s left and right i havent come across any car that i havent been able to take so far, that is considered an everyday car all you fan boys are just pissed because you have no individuality and didnt think for you selves instead you hopped on the M3 band wagon and got your self an M3 the 135i is better than an M3 in EVERY way get over it your car is no longer top dog.
MrGame470 3 weeks ago
@MrGame470 Now my boy come race my 07 c6 z06 and feel the pain!!!!!!!!!!!Hahahaahahaha.......
camirocz 1 week ago
@MrGame470 its cheaper, looks very stuffed and tacky and it actually is no longer than an m3
howerover 1 week ago
@vatan1923 are you tarded? The m3 ran exactly what it should have! The 135 has tune+meth+slicks that's why he ran 11.5! Every time I see a an m3 getting beaten all the fan boys come unglued and start ranting about the superiority of the m3. He fucking lost to a car that when new literary cost half as much!
myjeepsbigger3 1 month ago
o.O is that 135i an automatic? :O
kigen818 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
flyes like a rocket :)
1799cm2 1 month ago
135 running on slicks, m3 not.
rasqo3 2 months ago
What mods does the 135 have?
dgw787 2 months ago
amazing driver in the 135i. a sick launch.
bluenoserflatlander 2 months ago
1 series is for chicks nothing can be compared to the m3
irishfanok 2 months ago
id rather take the M3, its bigger, sounds nice ass hell can't deny that, its fast as well, and in consumer ratings the M3 through out the period of time has way less issues and complaints than the 135i and 335i, BUT! if you like smaller, compact, are going to lease, and primarily just don't give a F*** get the 135i lol, i like them both but if your riding an M3 thats a way more sexier car than both the 1 & 3 series and a Panty-Dropper if i might add.
nameissecret16 2 months ago
yeah, i own a 135i and have taken plenty M3's. But down at coast line, i wouldn't try. The advantage of the 135i away from the coast is the twin turbo and hence the air intakes which allows for better air flow.
bkg031181 2 months ago
fuck 135i, m3 all the way, 135 start early plus e92 driver doesnt know how to use lunch control and he is sleeping
vatan1923 3 months ago
I don't think people buy a 335i and mod it just to compete with the E9x M3. I think they just want the full potential from a great engine.
I'm sure the M3 is a great car, but I couldn't justify to myself paying an extra £20K, paying 3x more per year to keep the warranty going, more for insurance and double for a service. I want great performance for as little money as poss and drive a top quality car.
I love modding and there's more to be done with a non NA car..
BobBooker123 3 months ago
135i... bitches' car...
BadTOYO 3 months ago
goodbye
Kinkywetmommy 3 months ago
Lol hate all you want dollar for dollar you can't beat the 135i
myjeepsbigger3 3 months ago
some people are just dumb...stock vs modded...how about a modded 650 hp m3 vs a modded 450 335? I seen it...and the M3 eats it and shits it out. How you going to race a modded car vs a stock car? 335 and 135 owners try to make their cars faster to race THE KING of the track..the m3...remember that. you mod your cars to be faster then the car YOU ALL WISH you can drive. hahahah
BloxDesign 3 months ago
@BloxDesign so fucking swear of but their is no way of talking to these 335i and 135i owner bunch of faggots
narutovskiba88 3 months ago
@Goguha its all about torque. My 335 made over 400 pound feet of tq through the power band as you well know that's more than 100 lbft more than the m3. Maybe that's why the new m3 is going to be a twin turbo variant of the n54. I now have a 2010 135i with down pipes tune lsd fmic and air filters I have run 12.2@111 with a 1.8 60 ft on street tires. The car in this video has all the modds my car plus drag radials meth and prob race gas. Not to mention the car he is racing is the slower manual
myjeepsbigger3 3 months ago
I think it's not a stock 135i with 11,58 1/4 mile
I suppose the M5 V10 can 12,4
so It's a TRAP
benyacapoeira 3 months ago
at least the guy in the M3 doesn't drive a girl car...
mrbigair1234 3 months ago
:O :O :O WTF look at 0:16 - 0:17 at the front wheel :O :| niceee :X
Smecherul89 5 months ago 6
@Smecherul89 ^^ der geht nit weit hoch, nurn bisschen.. nit berrauschend
Norman631 2 months ago
@Smecherul89 looks like the wheels are off the ground just a tad bit!!!
mistad77 2 months ago
Ahhh the advantage of slicks
LOVESPORTSUPERCARS 5 months ago
BMW 335i,G-Power Hurricane and mercedes e63 amg
eminem1915 5 months ago
auto..
koc0090 6 months ago
not stock lmfaoooo
andrewgsupbrah 6 months ago
m3 i think your lease is up
fergieworld1222 6 months ago
0:04 WHEEEE HAHA HILURIOUS!!
scrokostas 6 months ago
none of this matters on windy roads... what the m3 lacks in straightaway power it makes up on turns(no im not biased i drive a e92 335i)... the n54 engine redlines at 7k rpm while the m3's engine redlines at 8500k combine that with the m suspension,brakes,tranny, and lsd... the m3 kills the 135i. unless off course u give the 135 all those m parts... o right they did its called the 1m lol...
dehkashar 6 months ago
13.35 for the M3...he needs driving lessons!
V35Skyline350GT 6 months ago
@V35Skyline350GT Haha, no kidding. Considering E36 M3 will run low 14's.
Shields686 6 months ago
i hate people that respond to top comments older than a few months .!!!!!
toob247 7 months ago
Both v good cars but the 35i does have a good tuning potential. Is it possible to buy a better after-market fuel pump for the 35 to overcome the widespread issues the stock BMW fuel pump suffers? This is the main concern after reading all the problems the 35i suffers with it's fuel pump.
caseyryeback1913 7 months ago
The 135i is a perfect powerplant to play with, the horsepower possibilities seem endless, this is where I think BMW starts to get the numbers right. The1 series in general is a good starting point for whatever somebody wants, its fast, small, lighter then adding 2 turbos to it make it a serious contender...
6UNLEASHED 7 months ago
The M3 is too big.
UberWagen 7 months ago
So...the 6 people that dislike this video, own a M3.
The135i 7 months ago 28
That a stock 135i? Those nittos made it look BOSS!
TinnInches 7 months ago
What the hell? Many pages of speculation about 135i vs M3 power advantages and launching styles? All you have see is the comment from 135i owner to see that it's heavily modified. 11.58 is way faster than a stock 135i, and 13.3s is a basic time for a stock M3.
rextetron 7 months ago
damn 11.58!
westsiyed 7 months ago
the 135's are sleepers them little shits is fast LMAO
xspade777 8 months ago
that was a NICE launch. good job
KBS604 8 months ago
3.5l 6-cyl in the smallest series car BMW makes... EPICNESS..
VolkswagOwned 8 months ago
@VolkswagOwned Uhm last time I checked it had 3.0L lol
rajvosa71000 8 months ago
@rajvosa71000 Well, I'm not a Bimmer guy (I'm a VAG guy). Judging by the name of the car.. the number behind the first number behind the first one is usually the literage.. 1= Series, 35= 3.5
VolkswagOwned 8 months ago
@VolkswagOwned I don't know how you got that information. somehow I ve heard that it is the torque that makes that last two digits. however, it is not 100% precise. put it this way, 325i, 328i, 330i,335i have been running and made better one after each particular model, but neither their torque nor their "literage" or displacement would just remain what they were 5 years ago or 10 years ago. 328i's displacement is not 2.80L. just FYI. peace.
kickyadick 8 months ago
@kickyadick Well, I stand Corrected
VolkswagOwned 8 months ago
@VolkswagOwned I see what you're saying, but its not that way in a BMW, 135i is a 3.0L, even the 128i is a 3.0L.
rajvosa71000 8 months ago
@rajvosa71000 Yahhh, I'm not really a Bimmer guy :P VW/Audi all tha way!!! lol
VolkswagOwned 8 months ago
@VolkswagOwned same here :P
rajvosa71000 8 months ago
@rajvosa71000 They used to indicate engine volume, but that's more than 15years ago now ...
335 and 740 is the same engine (just a slight more tuning to the 740) (and yes 3.0L I-6 TT)
goguhu 6 months ago
@VolkswagOwned Technically 35i engines are not 3.5L, but 3.0L Twin Turbo I6 (N54) or 3.0L Twin Scroll Turbo I6 (N55)
nonagon1 8 months ago
do you have ess or jb3? I've got jb3 (2.0) jn mine, love it
rylinx 8 months ago
11's mean he's running in the 400whp vicinity. Dayum.
Bilaltq 9 months ago
I love the people that are completely oblivious about what an m3 should run at a strip...low 12s or less ROFL. GTFO idiot...m3's were made for the twistys anyways brah...
Hyponikz 9 months ago
what a cheat
goldBCFC 9 months ago
And thats why you bring slicks to the track
mudslider20 9 months ago
EIther the M3 missed a shift or the guy wasn't even trying. The 1 is a beautiful car, but even with racing slicks and a cat-back exhaust, an E92 would beat it in a fair fight.
moselyliver 10 months ago
@moselyliver Lol...the M3 didn't missed a stift or anything like that. Running low 13's is very common, in a stock M3. That 135i is my car. I was driving it. It has a tune, intake, FMIC, exhaust, methanol kit and a small shot of nitrous. My best ET was 11.35@125mph.
The135i 10 months ago
@The135i
Oh, well that makes a lot more sense now with those mods. Great looking car too. Keep it up man!
moselyliver 10 months ago
13.35 for an m3? whats the elevation??
carfreak493 10 months ago
i think that 135i is an automatic
TheTauros0427 10 months ago
@TheTauros0427 definitely wouldnt be performing like that as an automatic. who drags an automatic?
SamiDullard10 9 months ago
@SamiDullard10 only anyone who is serious about dragging does.
god084 8 months ago
the 135 was on racetires
gpower88 10 months ago
Second 04.00-06.00 ITS FROM DRAWN TOGETHER
HUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! !
pitbullizer90 10 months ago
that isnt m3 e 92
aTTiLa0061 10 months ago
@aTTiLa0061 yes it is
135iGenyus 10 months ago
wtf is dat 135 on? i want some of it
kayu38 10 months ago
Comment removed
BMWdriver13 11 months ago
shitty m3 driver, but i support the 300hp 135. that thing is a freaking flyer somehow.
Jesse22H 1 year ago
is the 135i stock?
egghorayeb 1 year ago
13.35 sec for the M3? Ive seen stock 335i's match that time....
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
what kind of camera do you have ?
alzym1 1 year ago
Yes, but don't a 135i has a less good acceleration as a M3???
135: 5,2 seconds from 0 to 60 miles
M3: 5,1 seconds from 0 to 60 miles
it's not much, you had slicks on your car, but... i'm not so sure
MrVinceLang 1 year ago 10
@MrVinceLang
diff sources have put the 135i as low as 4.7 (InsideLine) and the M3 down to 4.9 (C&D btw), its all relative.
HBaJ32 1 year ago
@MrVinceLang ur 0-60 times are far off for the m3
flyersyouth12 8 months ago
@MrVinceLang Isn't the video enough to show that the 135i obviously accelerated faster? If both cars were stock the M3 would probably take it on the top end, but the 135 is still lighter and accelerates better in my opinion. Every car is different in real life though and different drivers as well.
LockDots84 8 months ago
@MrVinceLang
these are only numbers. its the same as the consumption. only reference data.
(i hope you understand my bad englisch)
MrFelix7 8 months ago
@MrVinceLang your times were like a second off... an M3's 0-60 is 4.2 seconds. not in the fives.
Jesse22H 8 months ago
@Jesse22H M3 E92 DCT does 0-60 in 3.9 (C&D), same as CTS-V (CTS-V does pull away 60-90 though, as it should). If a car beat another one this bad. it's more than slight tune (heavy tune, or crap vs good driver). i135 DCT does ~4.5 (C&D). I have never lost to any i135 stock or modified (with ~390hp and DCT it will match the M3 DCT). Other outcome is due to better/worse drivers. Newtons laws are still at work ... And to 'slaughter' the M3 u better have 500hp+ (or add $20 to M3 and get 675hp).
goguhu 6 months ago
@goguhu thats such bullshit! i raced my friends e92 m3 all the time with 08 335i with a jb4 fmic and intakes and walked him every time from a dig or a roll. he jumped 1.5 cars on the launch but by the middle of 3rd i would come around, and from a roll i would quickly begin to pull on him. (thats with stock exhaust) the car in this video is full bolt on+meth(hence the 11.58sec) quit buying magazines and buy a bmw.
myjeepsbigger3 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 Well then your friend does not know how to race. I have a E92 M3 myself (as well as a E46 M3, E36 M3, E36 325i M-tech, and a couple of bikes). If you beat a car with better hp/lb it's all due to you, and not the car. With JB4 you have ~380hp or so I guess (unless you have done a lot more). Look at just the torque curve, and you should understand why a turbo engine, even if it generate same peak power, can't keep up with the M3.
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I have several BMW's (3 are M3's). Anyhow, I'm just a fan of Isaac Newton and even if I try to break the law of physics, I still fail 100% of the time. Even with same peak hp as the M3 (given the weight are even, and at sub 100mph, the wider body of M3 won't really impact the drag/air resistance too much), there is not way with similar drivers the 335 will beat the M3. Just look at the torque curve ... M3 - flat like a table top 1500-8000, fall off the cliff at 5500-6500.
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I have several BMW's (3 are M3's). Anyhow, I'm just a fan of Isaac Newton and even if I try to break the law of physics, I still fail 100% of the time. Even with same peak hp as the M3 (given the weight are even, and at sub 100mph, the wider body of M3 won't really impact the drag/air resistance too much), there is not way with similar drivers the 335 will beat the M3. Just look at the torque curve ... M3 - flat like a table top 1500-8000, fall off the cliff at 5500-6500.
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
goguhu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
goguhu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@myjeepsbigger3 I have owned M3's and fast bikes since 1994. I'm also a fan of Isaac Newton, and so far not been able to beat the law of physics, no matter how much I try. Put the human element into this, and it's no longer perfect. If your 335 have sub 410hp, the only reason you beat your friend, is that you're a better driver than him. The M3 have very flat torque 1500-8000, while 335 fall off at 5500, and have a very spiky curve. You need more than matching hp to beat it.
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I do understand you want your car to be fast-er/st, but you need to understand that unless your car is 25% better off, the driver matter much more ... I beat a ZR1 in a Cobalt rental ... does not make the Cobalt faster ... made me faster. I have also beaten 911 Turbo on mountain roads with a Intrepid ... again, not the car, the driver.
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I have beaten ZR1 with Golf GTI (red light), 911 Turbo with Dodge Intrepid(mountain roads) and Ford F-150 with M3 (gravel road). In neither of these cases it was due to the car ... it was all about the driver (not me being the best, but the other being horrible). I do understand you want your car to beat M3 (why you got 335 and modded it in the first place), but you need 10-20% better hp/lb ratio than the M3 to beat it due to the poor torque curve on TT engines.
goguhu 5 months ago
@goguhu are you DUMB BRO? poor torque curve on 135???? it's 300lb stock kicks in at 1500rpm and carries on until 6.5k rpm...... DUDE it's n54 the smooth tq engine we're talking about here... everyone knows n54 spanks the m3 on straight lines from a deadstop. it's called jb4 + downpipes
BeybladeGeeks 4 months ago
@BeybladeGeeks Everybody having a x35i think so ... reality is reality ... when you wake up perhaps you can come back as well ...
M3 : 92%+ of torque over 70%+ of rev band
35i : 90%+ of torque over 32% of rev band ... that's not flat ... that's pathetic ... or rather ... how turbo works, and why people LOVE NA ... (however you can get more peak torque ... and sooner or later it's hard to compete)
At least spend some time looking at dyno chart before you make a fool out of yourself.
goguhu 4 months ago
BobBooker123 4 months ago
@BobBooker123 I bet you do not have 309tq from 0-1500 rpm, but yeah I agree 32% must have been wrong. Looks to be close to 52% (so I think I typed a 3 when I meant a 5, tx for the correction).
So 90% from 1700 - 5500 (5500 - 1700) / 7200 = 52%
goguhu 3 months ago
@BeybladeGeeks Any I was talking about stock ... yeah JB4/downpipes cost less than VT-775 ... but if you want to go there ... try your 135i JB4+++++/downpipe/+meatballs for dinner against my VT-775 ... but that was beside the point.
35i (and turbo engines in general) drop of fast after ~85% of rev limit. M3 keeps going all the way to the limit.
No at 5600 torque on 35i take a dive down to 170 at 6800 (225 @ 6500),
M3 drop to 270 at 8200 rpm, from 295 at 3900.
goguhu 4 months ago
@goguhu after owning a MK5 GTI and currently a 135i, I'd agree that after 5.5k RPM's you'd better change gear as you torque drops off dramatically. On my dyno charts (stage 1) torque peaks from 3-4k RPM and then drops off, although power has a steady climb to 6k RPM's before dropping off slightly.
fusion01wp 4 months ago
@BeybladeGeeks Read up on Dinan 335i vs E92 M3 and perhaps you learn something about hp/torque ...
"Let me just say, the 335 had more torque, less weight, and just a few horsies short of being even to the M3, and it still lost. It was slower in the 1/4 mile and around the track… "
If you want to learn something search for "DYNO results E92 M3 335i BMW Forum" first link show torque curve overlapped from 335i and M3. Notice how flat M3 is vs 335i, nothing to be ashamed of ... it's reality.
goguhu 4 months ago
@BeybladeGeeks N54 does not have a smooth tq curve ... even BMW admit to that (look at the gearing on their turbo engines). Same issue with the new M5 F10 (torque drop off at 6000+). N54 drop at 5500. Search for both, and you can look at the curve yourself - it's easier.
... everyone know S65 spanks the 335i on straight lines from a deadstop. it's called ESS VT-775
goguhu 3 months ago
Comment removed
goguhu 5 months ago
Comment removed
goguhu 5 months ago
Comment removed
goguhu 5 months ago
@myjeepsbigger3 I have 3 already ... might or might not get the M3 F80 next ... well if you tuned your 335 to have 450+ you should beat him ... jb4+ typically give you ~80hp, which bring you to 380 ... but yes keep midding and sooner or later you get into the 450+ ... but I have seen so many M3 lose to stock 335i that I would still say if you win, it's 90% you (driver). "On average the JB+ gives 40hp to the wheels, while the JB4 gives 70-80hp to the wheels, on an otherwise stock car. "
goguhu 3 months ago
@MrVinceLang Even if the m3 has better acceleration Stock. With a jb2 or jb3 installed the 135i will mop the flour with the m3. The 135 has alot of potential, chipped and bolt on mods even weight 200 pounds lighter. You can easily bring the hp close to 440 and that doesn't include meth injectors and race gas. The downfall of the 135 is the small little turbos they use. Quick to spool, great for acceleration but don't expect larger numbers. transmission unless its a manual or a smg tranny
greddy0513 7 months ago
@greddy0513 That's why you drop in a N55, single turbo, but it's twin-scroll ;)
Orangys280Z 7 months ago
@MrVinceLang
"135: 5,2 seconds from 0 to 60 miles" - this is a stock figure, with a simple tune it gets around 30% power gain, and being much lighter than M3 it just gets it ;)
89263833830 7 months ago
@MrVinceLang Technically speaking, those are the times released for 135i and M3, but on a good track with a good driver, I believe a 135i could do 0-100(km/hr) in 5 s. flat, and same goes for an M3, but really what you have to look at when comparing the two is that in terms of performance, you are paying an extra $80K-$100K for 0.01 seconds, of course there is more to cars than straight line time, but for anybody worried about price, M3 does not have a strong case against 135i, just my opinion
BoyOfSteel101 7 months ago
@MrVinceLang even if you wrote this long time ago, the 5,2 secs of the 135i isnt correct (bmw almost always says it accelerates slower on any car) normal 135i ~4,9-5,1
HeavyStunk1942 6 months ago
@MrVinceLang A tuned 135 will rape a stock M3.
Russell042 6 months ago
@Russell042 and all they have to do is use device they plug into the ecu then BANG MORE POWER
TheThedragonwarrior 6 months ago
Comment removed
911exero 6 months ago
Comment removed
911exero 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Russell042 and dont you think that a tuned m3 will do the same to the tuned 135?
911exero 6 months ago
@MrVinceLang
You must be kidding? The 135i is obviously chipped. This is a pretty typical outcome.
You see, the 135i is twin turbo, therefore tuning the ECU will enable one to increase the boost of the turbo very easily. This makes it possible to add roughly 100 crank horsepower to any N54 engine (2007-2009 335i, 135i included) for only $700.
View this: /watch?v=d8yq3spqC84
Or just search "chipped 335i 0-60" for some entertainment
QuikBMWkid 6 months ago
@MrVinceLang 4.7 on the m3 mate......
juancho939 5 months ago
@MrVinceLang m3 4.8 sec
Comizzle90 4 months ago
@MrVinceLang car and driver magazine clocked 3,9 with DCT trans 2011 model
mmmakeee 4 months ago
more possible... youtube.com/watch?v=s4O4NiJIRZs&feature=related
YamahaRacer210 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can't believe this...
YamahaRacer210 1 year ago
It looks like, that the driver of the M3 wasn't fully on the gaspedal...
it looked like he was breaking!!!
MrVinceLang 1 year ago 2
@MrVinceLang The 135i makes alot of cars look slow.. I own one and its a beast
blklacker 1 year ago 2
Slicksssss on the 135 but not m3
BrotherOfAdood84 1 year ago
That thing is quick!
DZoneMotorsportTV 1 year ago
How much HP was the 135i making? also mods plz
blutterback1234 1 year ago
@blutterback1234 463WHP and 460WTQ. ;-)
The135i 1 year ago
First off E92 M3 with the MDCT Stock and a professional driver claims a 12.4 1/4 mile.
And second that 135i is far from stock
NoRotorNoMotor114 1 year ago
@NoRotorNoMotor114 Your right, but most people CAN'T match the 1/4 mile times, that any car can claim to do. Btw that is my 135i. ;-)
I still have the time slip. The M3 had a 2.3 60ft and I did an 1.7 60ft. with no LSD.
The135i 1 year ago
@The135i Yeah. That guy's time was terrible though. And your 135i is fast as hell. Were you running slicks?
NoRotorNoMotor114 1 year ago
@NoRotorNoMotor114 Thanks! I was using some Mickey Thompson ET Street Radials. 275/40R17.
The135i 1 year ago
@The135i Well done sir well done
NoRotorNoMotor114 1 year ago
so obious that the 135 has a chip and the m3 driver a late and BAD start
m3 much faster
TheCrusader62 1 year ago
135i is on slicks and launched hard (watch it squat). Also likely it has at least a couple of power mods to crank out 11.58. M3 looks like it's on streets and did not launch hard, if at all. Slicks and good launch should put stock M3 into mid/low 12s.
lightnangles 1 year ago
M3 didnt even try?
Daml661 1 year ago
@Daml661 Stock M3 are not very fast. A stock 135i can keep up with a stock M3, from about 0-100mph.
The135i 1 year ago
@The135i hey dude its for the first time i hear of a 135i cs i'm a rookie in cars so can you tell me to what series the 135i belong to in the bmws?
and is it faster then the m3s? one more thing what is it top speed?
Saiko908 1 year ago
@Saiko908 A 135i is a 1 series car. It's just as fast as a 335i. Stock M3's are faster. But cost about $25-35k more then a 135i.
The135i 1 year ago
@Saiko908 A 135i is a 1 series car. It's just as fast as a 335i. Stock M3's are faster. But cost about $25-35k more then a 135i.
The top speed is 155mph.
The135i 1 year ago
@Saiko908 So, mr saiko... if it is a BMW 135, it is clear even for an ox that it belongs to 1 Series... And if you surf on BMW website you'll find all the answers to your "amazing" questions. If you can put such questions, it means you're very, very rookie in cars. Are you still using a dray, or what?
ZangLangVang 1 year ago
i think the m3 just had a bad launch, wouldve been a little closer but 135 faster anyways.
fellows00 1 year ago
negro
krazystang 1 year ago
That 135i just got up and went!! Yeah I think the M3 looks better but for 60k it damn well better! Al though I think the 135i looks great in it's own way.
mrcardio9r 1 year ago 26
@mrcardio9r actually i think it looks a bit like a john deer on the front... :(
jaishammer1 1 year ago
@mrcardio9r that's 175k for all you european fans #fucktaxes
caspernlify 1 year ago
surprised guy in m3 didn't have this vid banned, be prolly asked YT and they refused :)
fusion01wp 1 year ago
holy crap i never noticed how fast those 135i's really are..
nicee cars. but m3 still looks better(my opinion)
323ivsa4 1 year ago
11.58? It must have more than just a tune. What kind of rear tires are those?
sh1znack 1 year ago
Yeah, the 135 is tuned because they normally run mid 13's at 104mph stock.
casualguy393 1 year ago
That is my car...My best run was an 11.35 @ 125mph. Full bolt-on's plus a little bit of nitrous. (25 HP shot.) Without nitrous, my best is 11.62 @ 120mph.
The135i 1 year ago
135i=M3 (acceleration)
this m3 gotta really terrible run, maybe tires not warm or the driver sleeped...
the 135i is easy to tune up a little no need to nitrous, but im not sure if this one was tuned.... this guy did a perfect run....
Shirminator007 1 year ago
ohhh i dont know if the 135 was tuned up but one thing im sure of is that he had slicks on the rear and that help him a lot on the start!!
titifr21 1 year ago
@titifr21 to run an 11.58 in a 135, you'd have to have a pretty aggressive tune. maybe nitrous, but certainly a ton of boost. and that m3 just had a terrible run.
theoreticmusic 1 year ago
Great vid! i wish every clip was this good on youtube ha
twrzenski 1 year ago
yea that 135i must have been tuned or sumthin lol
AtomicCheese92 1 year ago
Sick Fast!!!
06C6Z06 1 year ago
the 135 is an auto, which is spectacular
issabmw 1 year ago
@issabmw you can get it as a 6 speed manual... which is pretty fun ^^
CIKO32123 1 year ago
135i = Porsche-Killer!
FOXDIEPATRIOT 1 year ago
hollyyyy shhiitt
afgzamir 1 year ago
impressive!
peterpan85a 1 year ago
this is why a lot of people do a rolling start, because the winner of the race like this often is determined by driver's skill.
but still, that 135 kicks out of the starting line really fast
nice cars!
hsinhunglin 1 year ago
@hsinhunglin If you look at the MPH's of each car, you will see that the M3 had no chance. Lol...
The135i 1 year ago
Wow... fuck the M3, Im getting this!!!!!
yumyumluckycharms 1 year ago
@yumyumluckycharms You can say "Fuck the m3" only when you tuned the 135i, and the driver of the 135i is experienced while the driver of the m3 needs to race more, because that m3 goes over 12seconds.
Aaendewyy 1 year ago
@Aaendewyy Im glad I said that... cuz I got awsome friends that hook me up with performance parts, and carbon fiber...
yumyumluckycharms 1 year ago
@yumyumluckycharms idiot
mrfuck1990 1 year ago
@mrfuck1990 shut it.
yumyumluckycharms 1 year ago
Very nice.
crooner12 1 year ago
Can you send me a PM with mod details?
woodman650 1 year ago
1addict buddy here, whats the mod list on that e82 man, we want to know...
ridge913 1 year ago
@ridge913 Tune, intakes, exhaust, FMIC, meth, line lock, drag tires and race gas.
The135i 1 year ago