clattery, noisy, rushed, monochromatic, played without love or a sense of fun, doesn't have an 'inner metronome', music doesn't have a regular pulse and is doesn't breathe (ergo, it's dead).
This is Glenn Gould tempo. I actually prefer this movement at this speed, and he does an adequate job of exposing the polyphonic texture of the movement at this fast pace. Bravo!
lil bit too fast, although it is "presto". and he is accelerating, especially at the beginning. but it seems his fingers can handle it, not bad at all
hahaha, you can see the page turner shaking his head in the beginning because he was rushing a bit. I still liked it despite the rush. It's always good to hear a piece made to be played in presto played in presto.
These comments are totally ridiculous. What justifies calling this performance 'shit'? Like some of the other offensively negative comments below, this must come from someone who has no musical intelligence or understanding of criticism. Your remark shows more about you than it does about the artist: it demonstrates your inferior knowledge of music, performance, and even of the English language. Perhaps the only shit here is you.
What are you, some sworn defender of incompetent musicians? And please, do not judge me because it seems that I lack vocabulary by using vulgate words. To me it seems you are one who dreams of eloquence and grandeur but is so dissilusioned that you must be hyper critical of the layman to make yourself feel better. And also, what qualifications do you have to judge my knowledge on music and performance? By writing my previous comment, did i really make it apparent?
You are avoiding the issue at hand: on what grounds are you criticizing this performance? The only thing apparent by both this and your old comment is that you have no vocabulary and thus no reasoning, at least none on display, to justify your assessment. Labeling a performance shit, being called on it, and STILL avoiding an explanation by writing rhetorical drivel makes your own incompetence all too clear.
first of all why must you attack my ability to speak english? just becasue of one use of the word "shit".
ok, let us not argue, you have made apparent that you wish to know why i label this performance as "shit". well he does have good physical skill i believe he lacks dynamic variety and could play in such a way that is more appealing to my taste (i.e playing it more in a musical fashion)i am not saying that the person is "shit", but yes, the performance was.
In your initial comment, you diminish this artist by stating that his playing is unlike his appearance: i.e., he looks professional but his playing is not. Now you admit that his interpretation does not conform to your understanding of what is musical. So a person's skill is not an objective standard, but rather a reflection of how closely it matches your taste. Heaven forbid that any performance be too far from your rock solid criteria!
i propose this to you, post a video of yourself (if possible) playing a piece of music (any, preferably classical piano)to your criteria of a good performance and i shall do the same. from this may we then maybe get a better understanding of eachothers standards
but why do you insit to makes personal attacks? are you that insecure? and dynamics is an obtuse part of music if thats what you are implying. especially for a piece that was written for an insrtument without great dynamic variety to be played on a modern piano. to be able to use dynamic effectively to give the piece "colour" is quite a skill
All you offer as justification is an obtuse comment about dynamic variety. What else defines playing "more in a musical fashion"? Have you heard many recordings of this movement? If the fast tempo disturbs you, what do you make of Gould's interpretations? His 1957 recording is 2 seconds faster than the above, while the 1981 version is considerably slower. How do you evaluate those? Is Gould, an obvious professional, less of an artist because you would disagree with his performance decisions?
Nicely done, although I personally feel as though the 3rd mvt was played a little too fast (I acknowledge that the tempo indication is presto). The phrases all semmed to blur together and there was little clarity.
PULL OVER BOY!
License and registration please....
Where do you think you're goin' like that presto boy?
;-)
lohphat 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This sucks cause you don't enjoy it and you rush!
connie3112 5 months ago
But you're chasing ...
Muzyk005 10 months ago
clattery, noisy, rushed, monochromatic, played without love or a sense of fun, doesn't have an 'inner metronome', music doesn't have a regular pulse and is doesn't breathe (ergo, it's dead).
spikehofmann 1 year ago 2
@spikehofmann Exactly.
anoncae 8 months ago
terrible
220392123 1 year ago
This is Glenn Gould tempo. I actually prefer this movement at this speed, and he does an adequate job of exposing the polyphonic texture of the movement at this fast pace. Bravo!
meats0 1 year ago
lil bit too fast, although it is "presto". and he is accelerating, especially at the beginning. but it seems his fingers can handle it, not bad at all
HanspeterHampelmann 1 year ago
GREAAAAAAT!!!!!
bachkwt 1 year ago
Maybe it is nerves disturbing him. He certainly is good, but he is running awfully fast, - accelerating all the way.
Still it´s better than the opposite, I suppose.
metteholm75 2 years ago
stop hatin....i bet half of u fools can't even play this piece
nehpets1000 2 years ago
looks like the guy would rather be happier at a bar drinking beer with buddies.
nevertheless123 2 years ago
horrible horrible, bad playing and no emotion at all !
nevertheless123 2 years ago
ich kann gar nicht so schnell hören wie der spielt- der spielt schneller als ich hören kann
markoffchaynie 2 years ago
hahaha, you can see the page turner shaking his head in the beginning because he was rushing a bit. I still liked it despite the rush. It's always good to hear a piece made to be played in presto played in presto.
dacrazyhyperboi 3 years ago 2
he is on coke
tommyIglesias 3 years ago
Oh my god! There's a terrible accelerando there!
SirArmengol 3 years ago
Those who insist upon degrading others have created a future of degredation for themselves 100% gauranteed.{ukuswa}
loftymercury 3 years ago
this is played way too fast and coupled with the terrible sound quality of the recording, it makes for one fast blurry musical ride.
violetblue 3 years ago
it s presto, and the "terrible sound quality of the recording" is in fact due to the echoing...
ckatherine19 3 years ago 4
exactly^^(although it's really a little bit fast)
scarecrowJ89 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sound is not good, he plays too fast and the baldy bearded guy is his gay partner. he has a bad haircut too. lol. about useless, insulting posts :P
ukuswa 3 years ago
lmfao
Shadowtech666 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
woah, that was shit i under the false impression that he was good because he looks professional, haha, was a wrong
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
These comments are totally ridiculous. What justifies calling this performance 'shit'? Like some of the other offensively negative comments below, this must come from someone who has no musical intelligence or understanding of criticism. Your remark shows more about you than it does about the artist: it demonstrates your inferior knowledge of music, performance, and even of the English language. Perhaps the only shit here is you.
bedany78 3 years ago
What are you, some sworn defender of incompetent musicians? And please, do not judge me because it seems that I lack vocabulary by using vulgate words. To me it seems you are one who dreams of eloquence and grandeur but is so dissilusioned that you must be hyper critical of the layman to make yourself feel better. And also, what qualifications do you have to judge my knowledge on music and performance? By writing my previous comment, did i really make it apparent?
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
You are avoiding the issue at hand: on what grounds are you criticizing this performance? The only thing apparent by both this and your old comment is that you have no vocabulary and thus no reasoning, at least none on display, to justify your assessment. Labeling a performance shit, being called on it, and STILL avoiding an explanation by writing rhetorical drivel makes your own incompetence all too clear.
bedany78 3 years ago
first of all why must you attack my ability to speak english? just becasue of one use of the word "shit".
ok, let us not argue, you have made apparent that you wish to know why i label this performance as "shit". well he does have good physical skill i believe he lacks dynamic variety and could play in such a way that is more appealing to my taste (i.e playing it more in a musical fashion)i am not saying that the person is "shit", but yes, the performance was.
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
In your initial comment, you diminish this artist by stating that his playing is unlike his appearance: i.e., he looks professional but his playing is not. Now you admit that his interpretation does not conform to your understanding of what is musical. So a person's skill is not an objective standard, but rather a reflection of how closely it matches your taste. Heaven forbid that any performance be too far from your rock solid criteria!
bedany78 3 years ago
here we go again with the personal attacks
i propose this to you, post a video of yourself (if possible) playing a piece of music (any, preferably classical piano)to your criteria of a good performance and i shall do the same. from this may we then maybe get a better understanding of eachothers standards
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
Go ahead and post a video response to this.
bedany78 3 years ago
ok i will, will you
but why do you insit to makes personal attacks? are you that insecure? and dynamics is an obtuse part of music if thats what you are implying. especially for a piece that was written for an insrtument without great dynamic variety to be played on a modern piano. to be able to use dynamic effectively to give the piece "colour" is quite a skill
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
All you offer as justification is an obtuse comment about dynamic variety. What else defines playing "more in a musical fashion"? Have you heard many recordings of this movement? If the fast tempo disturbs you, what do you make of Gould's interpretations? His 1957 recording is 2 seconds faster than the above, while the 1981 version is considerably slower. How do you evaluate those? Is Gould, an obvious professional, less of an artist because you would disagree with his performance decisions?
bedany78 3 years ago
and by the way, not to compete with your or such, but:
1. how old are you
2. what is your profession
3. if you are a musician, what are your qualifications
lazawrcat666 3 years ago
very messy...
BecsteinDude 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG, He ruined the piece, I stopped listening in the middle.
he's not feeling the music at all. he's just a robot and some1 probably told him that fast is good. this is absolutely not his call in life.
there are much better pianists here in youtube without a suit.
Levinger1 3 years ago
well it's a bit unstable but considering the tempo, he's very good already. and his tempo isn't even my allegro.
ryanyee1234567890 3 years ago
no etude
mpppadre 3 years ago 2
well, it is presto, so u should give him credits for playing fast ;]
his tenchiques are wonderful, but i certainly agree with u, its a little too blurry and needs clarity
dacrazyhyperboi 3 years ago
sublime
Jojos4444 4 years ago
Nicely done, although I personally feel as though the 3rd mvt was played a little too fast (I acknowledge that the tempo indication is presto). The phrases all semmed to blur together and there was little clarity.
However, this is only my umble opinion! :@)
The 1st and 2nd mvts were beautifully executed.
044784945 4 years ago