The end of the Space Shuttle era - 2.07

[Postie218]

I recommend the book "Riding Rockets" by Mike Mullane, you get the inside dope on what the Astronauts think about the "glass rocket".

[cybermarsactual]

I'm gonna beat you all up at recess!

[northernsurferboy]

that chick cooter must stink

[jamesjamesjac]

I had to stop when she said "Nucular." 7:38

[TheAlfonsz]

Nevěřím ani slovo  tlustý krávě a tomu Nýmandoj jakbysmet :D

[RONANGDD]

Get off the airwave stop wasting peoples time.

[deeryker]

shut the fuck up

[RONANGDD]

never mind spell check or punctuation you guys talk toooooooo much, you guys need to show more video & less gibrish or just get a life period........................­..

[spacevidcast]

@RONANGDD We appreciate your views to our video. Hopefully it's dawning on you that we're here to show the not-so-boring side of spaceflight. We're actually passionate about this stuff.

[deeryker]

@RONANGDD that would be gibberish eh

[TonyW1000]

After watching these guys It proves just how good Patrick Moore actually is.

[RONANGDD]

you guys are idiots wast of time

[spacevidcast]

@RONANGDD It's amusing to see you call someone else an idiot, when you're not even capable of using spell check or punctuation.

[slysupersonic]

i dont want to see the space shuttle go. i still want it to be in service while constellation is in service. but we all have to agree here. the human race NEEDS to return to the MOON! i wasn't born when apollo 13 landed on it. its not fair that my parents have that memory and i don't. so i want my turn at the moon. anybody age 30 and younger would agree with me.

[EpiDemic117]

@slysupersonic you WILL see it in your life time. Hell you might even see the first martian astronaut.

[spacevidcast]

@slysupersonic It's simply too expensive to have two different rocket designs happening at the same time. The only way for it to happen is if NASA got more funding, and that can only happen if people tel congress to give them more. Right now they only get 0.58% of the annual budget. 18 billion dollars. That's it, so please write your congressman and have your friends and family do it too.

[RegsterGuitar]

@slysupersonic Are you trying to be funny with the Apollo 13 thing or are you just misinformed?

[slysupersonic]

@RegsterGuitar i dont know are you? because i am actually.......ASSED OUT SERIOUS!!! i wanna see a lunar landing NOW!!!

[RegsterGuitar]

@slysupersonic What? .guy, you know Apollo 13 didn't land on the moon right? But yeah, a modern lunar landing would be the tits to witness.

[slysupersonic]

@RegsterGuitar maybe it was apollo 11 no matter what module it was, i wanna see it again!

[Baseshocks]

@slysupersonic whats wrong with the space shuttle going, man as time goes on shit changes new tech is developed, with the money it costs to launch the space shuttle they can use that in research for a new launcher. and as for apollo 13, man im 24 i was not here for the landings but comon i was old enough to see the movie with tom hanks lol you should have too if not, then watch it, its a good movie :D.

[slysupersonic]

@Baseshocks i know i know! its just the space shuttle is so cool! I used to build it out of lego's when i was younger! it looked beautiful! constellation looks like a flying piece of shit! the space shuttle looks like a graceful swan!

[Baseshocks]

@slysupersonic agreed :D.

[iorixs]

@slysupersonic no one ever went to the moon the space program is based on falsehood and the desire to promulgate a false "scifi" perception of reality. humanity has been radically bamboozled and brought to its knees to worship evil and commit horror

[irliving]

two retards

[shudyka]

bla bla blaaaa

[lsjd22]

PLEASE research how to use volume dynamic limiters or compressors! and general leveling. good topics

[millo24]

I LIKE TO SEE THE ANIMATIONS BUT THIS TWO IDIOTS JUST SUCK

[LegereBen]

Generations of inbreeding resulted in this.

[spacevidcast]

@LegereBen In what?

[okturus]

@LegereBen lmao

[260KPH]

@LegereBen anti-disgenics? well yes, we like to think that it is our right to breed with whom ever we want to and have as many kids with whom ever we want to; future generations of mankink are being settled on the results of what we do, or don't do.

[stophateing]

@LegereBen what the fuck is this watching this shit like wwf.half of american budget is bloown into space for nothing

[spacevidcast]

@stophateing Actually, there's a 7 to 1 return of investment for spaceflight. Heart monitoring machines for the astronaut crew becomes medical commonplace down here. Fireproofing materials are developed, even invisible braces came to be because of spaceflight. Google space spinoffs and see the first link.

[stophateing]

@spacevidcast sure

[fuckystoat]

@LegereBen lol

[ECsponger2]

omg shes sooooo annnnoyyyyying!!!

[aarperry]

A group of professors and PhD students from my university has been asked to work with NASA and the US air force in developing new spacecraft that can "fly" into space rather than using rockets. This is what I hope to work on after postgrad

[MrDeano324]

@aarperry, Virgin Galactic have already done that, NASA are a pile of crap, its up to the private companies to get the human race exploring space.

[spacevidcast]

@MrDeano324 They aren't exploring space. No one is, aside from robotics at this point. Give it a few years, and you'll see NASA get back into the groove of going beyond low earth orbit. Shortly after that (I'll say by 2025), private companies will be back on the moon, near earth objects, or further out.

[DarthCelcius]

Why is it so scary that Korea and such places are launching rockets to space?

USA are the only ones allowed to do that? they own space?

[svirrsvarr]

USA will ride from Russia for a looong time...

[jim6584]

In hindsight, just think if we didn't do the Shuttle and stuck with Apollo technology.

Can you imagine what Apollo would of evolved into with 40 years and the same $170 billion. Can you say, the reusable Saturn X? I can only dream of the capability we would have right now.

I am sure we would have a moon base.

With real heavy lift capability we would have tank sized probes on Mars.

The sad fact is, Constellation only gets us back to 1969. The shuttle cost us about 50 years.

[QuasiRandomViewer]

Re: OCONOES and Antarctica

Landing in the Indian Ocean near Antarctica is not so strange as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory was intended for a near polar orbit and was launched from Vandenberg.

[wiseguygabriel1]

Bshaun2.I hope that the "Bs"in your nickname does not stand for "bull sh*it" because you seem to be it.Put your money where your mouth is and do your research if you think you can handle the truth about the glory of your space exploration.

[lemdixon01]

Her voice is too load and his is too quiet so I keep having to adjust the volume.

[wiseguygabriel]

They are basically saying "space exploration of humanity is a joke".So true.We should really stay on the ground where we bellong untill someone designs and creates something descent.We are just expelling more and more junk into the Earths orbit and more and more radioactive space junk.

[PaulUmbarger]

@wiseguygabriel Should we take all the ships off the ocean until we come up with something better? What if the first guy to figure out that a hollowed out log made a decent canoe would have put it off until we had something better? In short, gotta start somewhere and build on it.

[wiseguygabriel1]

Let me think about that...Yes we should put it off untill we can make something descent.I would but that is just my rationality and dignity talking.Would you sail on the ocean on a log full of holes?I didnt think so.

[PaulUmbarger]

@wiseguygabriel1 Perhaps not. But, we stand on teh shoulders of those that did. And we learned from those mistakes. No one is going to climb down from the sky and give us the answer in one neat little package. We have to do that on our own, one step at a time. We sort of have to enjoy the trip as much as the destination. Can't have one with out the other.

[bshaun2]

@wiseguygabriel

You may want to look into the concept of "Actually knowing what the hell your talking about" I think you may like it

[SuperKipper123]

If it wern't for the people that alloed Challenger to launch and gave Coloumbia the "go" for re-entry the shuttle wouldnt be retireing

[furgee]

i think it is rediculus that it is gonna be, what, five years before the US launches another manned flight after the last shuttle. Come on America, WE ARE BETTER THAN THAT!!!!

[spacevidcast]

Well, we do have COTS and SpaceX... So we'll have a private US company possibly sending humans to the ISS shortly after the shuttles retire.

[MrDeano324]

@spacevidcast Screw the ISS, humanity needs to set its sights higher. Its been over half a century since humanities been in space, and what have we got to show for it? a footprint on the moon, a couple of satelites, and a bloody space station. We need to be thinking about a perminant coloney on the Moon and manned space flights to Mars. If all the 50+ years of the space age were done right, we could be thinking about actually exploring outside our solar system by now. But we were far to slow.

[spacevidcast]

@MrDeano324 Part of the delay is because the general public doesn't care. This is why spacevidcast exists. We're here to show that space isn't boring or lame.

Let me explain.

NASA's funded by Congress. Public interest (writing your congressman) provides proof that space is something we care about. This means Congress gives more $ for space exploration, because it's what the voters want. As the saying goes, "No bucks, no Buck Rogers."

Please write your congressman if you care about space!

[Armigo91]

@MrDeano324

the reason obama voted for research in better propulsion systems is because todays propulsion systems fail. Aka solid and chemical propulsion. only 5% of all the weight that makes the shuttle or the rocket, is the part that goes into orbit.

so thats very costly, insufficient, and not financial supportable.

The timeline however in which obama wants to take these steps is way to short.

Nasa cannot do it, i hope a community of private companys can pull of the future space works.

[spacevidcast]

@Armigo91 There's nothing that exists even within reason that is safer in the atmosphere than chemical rockets (chemical propulsion is defined as anything not nuclear, electrical, light based, etc). A liquid or solid rocket is a chemical rocket, regardless of the fuel and oxidizer.

And 18 billion dollars per year for 20 years would still leave NASA short with an efficient non-chemical rocket that's safe in the atmosphere. Private companies would have even more of a hard time doing such a thing.

[UdallIn72]

I hope they at least extend the Space Shuttle program to close the gap until Constellation's ready to fly.

It's a terrible idea to leave the United States without its own assured manned access to space for five years at a time when Putin's clearly getting crazier by the day.

[webboffin]

What the heck is this show about?

[spacevidcast]

Human Space Flight

[Finnlander132]

Thank god for the Ares project, its the greatest set of rockets ever built. I hope they end the shuttle tomorrow so they can focus on both the Ares-1 and the (much cooler and more capable) Ares-V rockets.

[passycot]

i thought this was suposed to be about the end of the space shuttle program.

[thaitanium12]

"it said the meek will take over the world"

The meek said if thats allright by eveyone else?

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

i know nasa is keeping the truth of whats really happening in space.the tax payer suffers by there bs lairsall there doing is slowing up progress of space .on other black projects or 2012 in the bible it said the meek will take over the world or the powerfull we the tax payers will die while they live.nasa employees say too much there either sacked or go missing= fear.

[MrMegaWolfeman]

what the heck are you trying to say, the meek means those who do not wrong, not those who are behind the scenes

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

ok einsten.nasa as we all beleive tells us the truth or info that we want to hear about.they keep all the important info for there selves dig huge underground bases that hold the same lairs=meek we the tax payee suffer. pay for there bases or help to build bases=meek .the less they tell us the better off they are.sinking in yet????those who do no wrong=meek=goverment=nasa.....­....

[MrMegaWolfeman]

well, i kind of find all of that hard to believe, yes of course they build bases, they are either military or military affiliated, it is so they can keep away from russian and european spy satellites, it is what every military does. My mother used to be in the United States Air force, Judge Advocates Generals office, so she was a lawyer in the Forces. She was an officer, and has been to Area 51, she said all she saw was prototype jets (modded F4's) not crazy shit like you say..sorry

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

ok first of all the goverment says area 51 doesnt exist . now your saying coz u have family who works at area 51 it does exist so ....whos lairing? and your mother or what ever has signed papers she wont tell what goes on at area 51 or else .e.g she be out of a job ...or worse.and they do much more then mods on f 4s .your a idiot who knows f all.

[MrMegaWolfeman]

Lol, it exists man, and she went back in the 1970s, and now she lives in canada. Also the F 4 phantoms were fighter jets during the vietnam war. Any noob knows that, secondly, you can barely speak fucking english. Third, you are a pathetic conspiracy theorist who needs to get some balls. Finally, the govt denies bases because they are supposed to be top secret you moron lmao, dont quit your day job

[spacevidcast]

And remember MrMegaWoldeman, don't feed the trolls. Spacevidcast tends to attract a few conspiracy theorists due to the nature of the program. We like to just ignore them. You'll find that when they don't get any attention the start to starve off and die.

Alas, there is always a new troll to take their place. In that scenario, starve it too.

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

U ENT GOT A JOB RETARD.anyway if its that top secret. how come we know about some of the bases a retard. it "exists man.and she went back inthe 1970s".no need to tell me twat.its the goverment who are saying area 51 dont exist.why dont u write a memo to the goverment sayng how top secret bases they have . wonder what else the goverment denies.e.g moon landing.they have never meet aliens.and they have underground bases solely for them and the homoured few.fing idiot twat.

[ponybottle]

8 minutes of info an 30 minutes of giggling !

C'mon you guys !

[spacevidcast]

Who wants a show with nothing but info. Come on, lighten up and have some fun!

[spacevidcast]

@ponybottle It's better than NASA....24 hours of blahblahblah and no personality.

[tobigforyou]

@spacevidcast instead of ridiculing your viewers when they complain, I suggest you listen to them.

[ndgreenaway]

@ponybottle put me off

[Postie218]

I recommend the book "Riding Rockets" by Mike Mullane, you get the inside dope on what the Astronauts think about the "glass rocket".

[cybermarsactual]

I'm gonna beat you all up at recess!

[northernsurferboy]

that chick cooter must stink

[jamesjamesjac]

I had to stop when she said "Nucular." 7:38

[TheAlfonsz]

Nevěřím ani slovo tlustý krávě a tomu Nýmandoj jakbysmet :D

[RONANGDD]

Get off the  airwave stop wasting peoples time.

[deeryker]

shut the fuck up

[RONANGDD]

never mind spell check or punctuation you guys talk toooooooo much, you guys need to show more video & less gibrish or just get a life period........................­..

[spacevidcast]

@RONANGDD We appreciate your views to our video. Hopefully it's dawning on you that we're here to show the not-so-boring side of spaceflight. We're actually passionate about this stuff.

[deeryker]

@RONANGDD that would be gibberish eh

[TonyW1000]

After watching these guys It proves just how good Patrick Moore actually is.

[RONANGDD]

you guys are idiots wast of time

[spacevidcast]

@RONANGDD It's amusing to see you call someone else an idiot, when you're not even capable of using spell check or punctuation.

[slysupersonic]

i dont want to see the space shuttle go. i still want it to be in service while constellation is in service. but we all have to agree here. the human race NEEDS to return to the MOON! i wasn't born when apollo 13 landed on it. its not fair that my parents have that memory and i don't. so i want my turn at the moon. anybody age 30 and younger would agree with me.

[EpiDemic117]

@slysupersonic you WILL see it in your life time. Hell you might even see the first martian astronaut.

[spacevidcast]

@slysupersonic It's simply too expensive to have two different rocket designs happening at the same time. The only way for it to happen is if NASA got more funding, and that can only happen if people tel congress to give them more. Right now they only get 0.58% of the annual budget. 18 billion dollars. That's it, so please write your congressman and have your friends and family do it too.

[RegsterGuitar]

@slysupersonic Are you trying to be funny with the Apollo 13 thing or are you just misinformed?

[slysupersonic]

@RegsterGuitar i dont know are you? because i am actually.......ASSED OUT SERIOUS!!! i wanna see a lunar landing NOW!!!

[RegsterGuitar]

@slysupersonic What? .guy, you know Apollo 13 didn't land on the moon right? But yeah, a modern lunar landing would be the tits to witness.

[slysupersonic]

@RegsterGuitar maybe it was apollo 11 no matter what module it was, i wanna see it again!

[Baseshocks]

@slysupersonic whats wrong with the space shuttle going, man as time goes on shit changes new tech is developed, with the money it costs to launch the space shuttle they can use that in research for a new launcher. and as for apollo 13, man im 24 i was not here for the landings but comon i was old enough to see the movie with tom hanks lol you should have too if not, then watch it, its a good movie :D.

[slysupersonic]

@Baseshocks i know i know! its just the space shuttle is so cool! I used to build it out of lego's when i was younger! it looked beautiful! constellation looks like a flying piece of shit! the space shuttle looks like a graceful swan!

[Baseshocks]

@slysupersonic agreed :D.

[iorixs]

@slysupersonic no one ever went to the moon the space program is based on falsehood and the desire to promulgate a false "scifi" perception of reality. humanity has been radically bamboozled and brought to its knees to worship evil and commit horror

[irliving]

two retards

[shudyka]

bla bla blaaaa

[lsjd22]

PLEASE research how to use volume dynamic limiters or compressors! and general leveling. good topics

[millo24]

I LIKE TO SEE THE ANIMATIONS BUT THIS TWO IDIOTS JUST SUCK

[LegereBen]

Generations of inbreeding resulted in this.

[spacevidcast]

@LegereBen In what?

[okturus]

@LegereBen lmao

[260KPH]

@LegereBen anti-disgenics? well yes, we like to think that it is our right to breed with whom ever we want to and have as many kids with whom ever we want to; future generations of mankink are being settled on the results of what we do, or don't do.

[stophateing]

@LegereBen what the fuck is this watching this shit like wwf.half of american budget is bloown into space for nothing

[spacevidcast]

@stophateing Actually, there's a 7 to 1 return of investment for spaceflight. Heart monitoring machines for the astronaut crew becomes medical commonplace down here. Fireproofing materials are developed, even invisible braces came to be because of spaceflight. Google space spinoffs and see the first link.

[stophateing]

@spacevidcast sure

[fuckystoat]

@LegereBen lol

[ECsponger2]

omg shes sooooo annnnoyyyyying!!!

[aarperry]

A group of professors and PhD students from my university has been asked to work with NASA and the US air force in developing new spacecraft that can "fly" into space rather than using rockets. This is what I hope to work on after postgrad

[MrDeano324]

@aarperry, Virgin Galactic have already done that, NASA are a pile of crap, its up to the private companies to get the human race exploring space.

[spacevidcast]

@MrDeano324 They aren't exploring space. No one is, aside from robotics at this point. Give it a few years, and you'll see NASA get back into the groove of going beyond low earth orbit. Shortly after that (I'll say by 2025), private companies will be back on the moon, near earth objects, or further out.

[DarthCelcius]

Why is it so scary that Korea and such places are launching rockets to space?

USA are the only ones allowed to do that? they own space?

[svirrsvarr]

USA will ride from Russia for a looong time...

[jim6584]

In hindsight, just think if we didn't do the Shuttle and stuck with Apollo technology.

Can you imagine what Apollo would of evolved into with 40 years and the same $170 billion. Can you say, the reusable Saturn X? I can only dream of the capability we would have right now.

I am sure we would have a moon base.

With real heavy lift capability we would have tank sized probes on Mars.

The sad fact is, Constellation only gets us back to 1969. The shuttle cost us about 50 years.

[QuasiRandomViewer]

Re: OCONOES and Antarctica

Landing in the Indian Ocean near Antarctica is not so strange as the Orbiting Carbon Observatory was intended for a near polar orbit and was launched from Vandenberg.

[wiseguygabriel1]

Bshaun2.I hope that the "Bs"in your nickname does not stand for "bull sh*it" because you seem to be it.Put your money where your mouth is and do your research if you think you can handle the truth about the glory of your space exploration.

[lemdixon01]

Her voice is too load and his is too quiet so I keep having to adjust the volume.

[wiseguygabriel]

They are basically saying "space exploration of humanity is a joke".So true.We should really stay on the ground where we bellong untill someone designs and creates something descent.We are just expelling more and more junk into the Earths orbit and more and more radioactive space junk.

[PaulUmbarger]

@wiseguygabriel Should we take all the ships off the ocean until we come up with something better? What if the first guy to figure out that a hollowed out log made a decent canoe would have put it off until we had something better? In short, gotta start somewhere and build on it.

[wiseguygabriel1]

Let me think about that...Yes we should put it off untill we can make something descent.I would but that is just my rationality and dignity talking.Would you sail on the ocean on a log full of holes?I didnt think so.

[PaulUmbarger]

@wiseguygabriel1 Perhaps not. But, we stand on teh shoulders of those that did. And we learned from those mistakes. No one is going to climb down from the sky and give us the answer in one neat little package. We have to do that on our own, one step at a time. We sort of have to enjoy the trip as much as the destination. Can't have one with out the other.

[bshaun2]

@wiseguygabriel

You may want to look into the concept of "Actually knowing what the hell your talking about" I think you may like it

[SuperKipper123]

If it wern't for the people that alloed Challenger to launch and gave Coloumbia the "go" for re-entry the shuttle wouldnt be retireing

[furgee]

i think it is rediculus that it is gonna be, what, five years before the US launches another manned flight after the last shuttle. Come on America, WE ARE BETTER THAN THAT!!!!

[spacevidcast]

Well, we do have COTS and SpaceX... So we'll have a private US company possibly sending humans to the ISS shortly after the shuttles retire.

[MrDeano324]

@spacevidcast Screw the ISS, humanity needs to set its sights higher. Its been over half a century since humanities been in space, and what have we got to show for it? a footprint on the moon, a couple of satelites, and a bloody space station. We need to be thinking about a perminant coloney on the Moon and manned space flights to Mars. If all the 50+ years of the space age were done right, we could be thinking about actually exploring outside our solar system by now. But we were far to slow.

[spacevidcast]

@MrDeano324 Part of the delay is because the general public doesn't care. This is why spacevidcast exists. We're here to show that space isn't boring or lame.

Let me explain.

NASA's funded by Congress. Public interest (writing your congressman) provides proof that space is something we care about. This means Congress gives more $ for space exploration, because it's what the voters want. As the saying goes, "No bucks, no Buck Rogers."

Please write your congressman if you care about space!

[Armigo91]

@MrDeano324

the reason obama voted for research in better propulsion systems is because todays propulsion systems fail. Aka solid and chemical propulsion. only 5% of all the weight that makes the shuttle or the rocket, is the part that goes into orbit.

so thats very costly, insufficient, and not financial supportable.

The timeline however in which obama wants to take these steps is way to short.

Nasa cannot do it, i hope a community of private companys can pull of the future space works.

[spacevidcast]

@Armigo91 There's nothing that exists even within reason that is safer in the atmosphere than chemical rockets (chemical propulsion is defined as anything not nuclear, electrical, light based, etc). A liquid or solid rocket is a chemical rocket, regardless of the fuel and oxidizer.

And 18 billion dollars per year for 20 years would still leave NASA short with an efficient non-chemical rocket that's safe in the atmosphere. Private companies would have even more of a hard time doing such a thing.

[UdallIn72]

I hope they at least extend the Space Shuttle program to close the gap until Constellation's ready to fly.

It's a terrible idea to leave the United States without its own assured manned access to space for five years at a time when Putin's clearly getting crazier by the day.

[webboffin]

What the heck is this show about?

[spacevidcast]

Human Space Flight

[Finnlander132]

Thank god for the Ares project, its the greatest set of rockets ever built. I hope they end the shuttle tomorrow so they can focus on both the Ares-1 and the (much cooler and more capable) Ares-V rockets.

[passycot]

i thought this was suposed to be about the end of the space shuttle program.

[thaitanium12]

"it said the meek will take over the world"

The meek said if thats allright by eveyone else?

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

i know nasa is keeping the truth of whats really happening in space.the tax payer suffers by there bs lairsall there doing is slowing up progress of space .on other black projects or 2012 in the bible it said the meek will take over the world or the powerfull we the tax payers will die while they live.nasa employees say too much there either sacked or go missing= fear.

[MrMegaWolfeman]

what the heck are you trying to say, the meek means those who do not wrong, not those who are behind the scenes

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

ok einsten.nasa as we all beleive tells us the truth or info that we want to hear about.they keep all the important info for there selves dig huge underground bases that hold the same lairs=meek we the tax payee suffer. pay for there bases or help to build bases=meek .the less they tell us the better off they are.sinking in yet????those who do no wrong=meek=goverment=nasa.....­....

[MrMegaWolfeman]

well, i kind of find all of that hard to believe, yes of course they build bases, they are either military or military affiliated, it is so they can keep away from russian and european spy satellites, it is what every military does. My mother used to be in the United States Air force, Judge Advocates Generals office, so she was a lawyer in the Forces. She was an officer, and has been to Area 51, she said all she saw was prototype jets (modded F4's) not crazy shit like you say..sorry

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

ok first of all the goverment says area 51 doesnt exist . now your saying coz u have family who works at area 51 it does exist so ....whos lairing? and your mother or what ever has signed papers she wont tell what goes on at area 51 or else .e.g she be out of a job ...or worse.and they do much more then mods on f 4s .your a idiot who knows f all.

[MrMegaWolfeman]

Lol, it exists man, and she went back in the 1970s, and now she lives in canada. Also the F 4 phantoms were fighter jets during the vietnam war. Any noob knows that, secondly, you can barely speak fucking english. Third, you are a pathetic conspiracy theorist who needs to get some balls. Finally, the govt denies bases because they are supposed to be top secret you moron lmao, dont quit your day job

[spacevidcast]

And remember MrMegaWoldeman, don't feed the trolls. Spacevidcast tends to attract a few conspiracy theorists due to the nature of the program. We like to just ignore them. You'll find that when they don't get any attention the start to starve off and die.

Alas, there is always a new troll to take their place. In that scenario, starve it too.

[TONYPARAMOTOR]

U ENT GOT A JOB RETARD.anyway if its that top secret. how come we know about some of the bases a retard. it "exists man.and she went back inthe 1970s".no need to tell me twat.its the goverment who are saying area 51 dont exist.why dont u write a memo to the goverment sayng how top secret bases they have . wonder what else the goverment denies.e.g moon landing.they have never meet aliens.and they have underground bases solely for them and the homoured few.fing idiot twat.

[ponybottle]

8 minutes of info an 30 minutes of giggling !

C'mon you guys !

[spacevidcast]

Who wants a show with nothing but info.  Come on, lighten up and have some fun!

[spacevidcast]

@ponybottle It's better than NASA....24 hours of blahblahblah and no personality.

[tobigforyou]

@spacevidcast instead of ridiculing your viewers when they complain, I suggest you listen to them.

[ndgreenaway]

@ponybottle put me off

[Nasiar99]

It'd be nice to keep the shuttles flyin tell 2015 but they are already so old and rickidy. If we pushem to hard It'd be like OCONOES all over agian!

[lostintimeBC]

i do enjoy the improv.

it is intresting that we went from

strapping a guy to the nose of a rocket

to a reusable space plane. now going back to strapping a guy to the nose of a

rocket. will look forward to your next transmission

[spacevidcast]

It is, and frankly a bit disappointing. Maybe we need to stop looking to NASA and start looking to private space for innovation? Although $20 billion in funding will certainly help get them innovation one way or another!

[hendrikharryg]

Well, sometimes innovation is more dangerous than old school (and more expensive). Thats what shuttle finally was. It was a total miscalculation for you pay 16,000$/kg, planned was 200$/kg. Shuttle is also the only System, that took american lives in flight. You can't say this 'bout Apollo - tough they had their own losses and problems. But you're right in saying that privat comps. will have a big influence in future spacetravel and launch-ops. Still NASA will be the US-Space Cience "channel".

[spacevidcast]

Well I don't think that this is a really fair comparison. While Apollo never took any lives in flight, it also didn't fly nearly as long as the shuttle did. Stretch the Apollo program out over 30 to 40 years and I'm pretty sure they would have had accidents there too.

[hendrikharryg]

...good point

[hendrikharryg]

...good point

[hendrikharryg]

Tecnically thus vid is ok, though terer are one or two jumps within the last 8 miunts.

[spacevidcast]

Yeah, CamTwist crashed twice in the show (beta software, so expected) and we had to rough cut it back together. Nice catch though.

[nilbud]

Nukular?!

[U5K0]

great show guys... sorry I missed the live cast but I got a massive amount of school stuff on my plate right now. hope that changes soon. see ya