Reese Erlich - What Happens if the U.S. Invades Iran?

[royalnaz1]

i dont know about you all but when you have kids or younger brothers or sisters you want to see peace but it will never happen.

[geoff281069]

The US Court Judgement on 911 is a complete fabrication to justify attacking any country the US pleased. Alkeida is a CIA Database NOT a terrorist organisation. Also used after 9/11 as the imaginary enemy to go to War with. These excuses for attacking Afganistan - trained by the CIA , Iraq's Sadam - Installed by the CIA and now Iran , who have not attacked anyone in 300 years and need a deterant against MAD US, UN and Isreal politicians, are as MAGIC ROUNDABOUT !

[franksinbeans]

"Uploaded by RussiaToday on Dec 16, 2011

A US court has won a default judgement that Iranian officials, including its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, provided help to the 9/11 hijackers behind the worst terror attack on American soil. The lawsuit was filed by the families of the atrocity's victims. There was no Iranian representation in court."

[franksinbeans]

@franksinbeans just a little update for everybody

[eerginer]

WHY DOESN'T THE PEOPLE WHO UPLOAD THESE VIDEOS CHECK THE AUDIO OF THEM? PEOPLE ARE HAVING DIFFICULTY IN CLEARLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE WONDERFUL PERSON IS SAYING.

[Verradonairun]

This guy clearly has no grasp of the geopolitics of the Middle East. He is too use to American culture and can't think in another manner.

[shaheen1990]

im not Iranian and Im not American But this was SOOO stupid and im not gonna say who's better and Etc but Why does USA think they could defeat IRAN seriously ?

[snakeyuk]

USA = BABYLON , in my opinion... i just feel sorry for the american people , they have such a shitty government. they want want want all the time they think they have the right to run the world and make a new world order. THATS WHAT ALL THIS IS ABOUT AT THE END OF THE DAY "THEY WANT A NEW WORLD ORDER" its all bullshit people truely bullshit. they are all decieving us man...... , the lord shall reign when the time comes. i think some people better start repenting. and fast..

[agent1up]

@snakeyuk oh lord.......

[sweettooth37]

@snakeyuk american people will fight the nwo until there is absolutely no hope for the old america to be brought back, we still have militias in the usa just as we did in the late 1700's early 1800's when we defeated the 2 most powerful militaries in the world first britain, then spain the britian again, the second american revolution will spark the world revolution!!!

[Shahin2102]

Beautiful speech, glad to see one American who has enough brains.

[antekification]

US SHOULD BE PUNNISHED FOR ITS UNLAWFUL ACTS! GO IRAN! DOWN WITH ISRAHELL AND USA!

[rapehitler]

@antekification gtfo faggot

[47saeed]

No Iranian wants USA to attack Iran. We will sort our own problems.

[obfball74]

Yeah your right the Chinese did drive the US down to 20 miles away from the coast, but America fought its way back.

Plus, guess how the Korean War ended? It ended when Truman told China to sign the cease fire, or we will nuke you. And it was done.

[azkodagama]

Nope. United States only retook the Seoul and was back at the 38th parallel, and from that point it was a stalemate. US would have never nuked China, because Soviet Union at the time was an ally of China and would have intervened which would have started the 3rd world war. And by they way, the ceasefire was signed because neither side was making any progress. Just so you know...

[iHelptheNeeded]

Now shut your chinese dumb piece of shit up

[aviomaster]

-- HEY WHat about Saudi Arabia , where woman are threated like dogs ,,,

Why don't you talk about Saud Arabia old asshole ,

IRAQ was acctually modest muslim country in the region , where terrorists were not present , ALL people who attack USA forces are IRAQI people . I hope Russian Federation and China get involved IF USA attacks IRAN .

Aleksei Miller(Gasprom) went to IRAN to sign deals for Export of Iranian gas and OIL. hahahahaha IRANIAN OIL and GAS are Russian

[Hesam0000]

CrazyHoe31,

Who lifted the rock and let you worm outa dirt ?

Dumb ignorant trailertrash. Go read a book, don't waste time expressing crapinions.

[Wrldleader1]

Listen to this lying dog. The women in the united states are more oppressed. Remove men from power.

[bigdaddy9247]

Remember, cowboysa are better shots than camel riders...... A platoon of Clint Eastwoods, JohnWaynes and Chuck Norrisses would defeat ur whole Army. Lets live in peace becuz i garuntee Iran does not want war with us. maybe with Israel, but not with US.

[Hesam0000]

First of all we Iranians don't ride camels we ride Mercedes, Cadillacs and Lexus and we let Americans, Japanese and Germans build them for us.

Second, Whatever cowboys do, our Turkmen riders do better. You guys study Algebra in school & make D or F, we created the Algebra.

You guys attack this & that country unsuccessfully to build a tiny empire, we owned an empire half the world in size.

Yes if America drops a nuke on Iran we die but Russia will kick America's ass & on the ground we will.

[Hesam0000]

By the way, Eastwood, john wayne and chuck are fake actors not real toughguys.

Let's see one of them volunteer to walk on mines as thousands of Iranian teens did when Saddam attacked us :)

[BroadCastTuber]

Yeah? Russia ganna kick US' ass?

Hey if its a fight they want, you think US ganna back down? I think not.

Hell both countries would just nuke the shit out of each other, taking out surrounding countries also like Canada, Mexico, Part of Europe and Asia.

[Hesam0000]

As far as power, yes Russia can kick US ass while it's own ass gets kicked back nearly as hard buton the ground Russia+China+Korea have 400% more power than the US and Russia has near 15000 nukes compared to US's 9000.

But as you said no one is crazy enough to attempt to test the other side's power. US/Israel don't even test Iran's power for the fear of unknown. Nobody likes surprises.

[BroadCastTuber]

Lady do you even have an idea what would happen if Russia want to fight US?

US + NATO vs. Russia, China, N. Korea

US wins hands down. No way Russia would be able to hold off Europe (Democratic countries support each other) Japan and Australia would be attacking N. Korea and China.

And if it comes to nuclear, the whole entire world would be gone.

[Hesam0000]

I'm a gentleman not a lady :))

That's not my picture.

US ground force can't easily conquer Iraq, just imagine if you add 2,000,000 armed/trained Chinese, add 1,000,000 armed koreans to the 1mil Russians.

UK/Australia/France forces are offset by China, then US is left with Korea plus Russia. Japan has no army and it's against US. That's not even assuming Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Iraq, Turkey joining Russia. On the ground right now Iran alone can compete with US if not better.

[azkodagama]

Are you dumb??? China alone can take US

[iHelptheNeeded]

Are you dumb? America is more trained and experianced fighters. So what if you have more people? We have nukes bro we got a better armor, wait we got BETTER FUCKING EVERYTHING.

[azkodagama]

HAHA lol, is that why Americans almost lost the Korean War?? Yes you did almost lose it. Actually neither side won. When Americans pushed themselves towards China in North Korea, China responded by driving out the Americans from the North Korea and into Seoul again. And to your remark, hell no... Americans do no have the best weapons and better gear. Just so you know China also has nukes, and Russia has more nukes, and its an ally of China. FYI: You lost the Vietnam war, and their army is shit.

[iHelptheNeeded]

LOLOLOOLOL you fucking fail

[azkodagama]

Is that what you always reply when you know that you fucking right?? You dumb shit.

[iHelptheNeeded]

Chinese active combat ready military forces: 1.25 million grunts training quality: very poor Average life expectancy in combat: 5 days tanks: 6,000 tank quality: poor mostly old armour types, no modernizations in the armour sector Air forces ability to establish air superiority: average no major advantages Aircraft quality: poor, mostly fighters from cold war era with little maintainence

[azkodagama]

No you shut the fuck up. You dumb shit. Yes United States does maybe has better TECHNOLOGY, but Chinese soldiers are MUCH MORE disciplined and better trained. yes you dumb shit. And do you really think that China would just advertise its military hardware?? HUH?? Its a communist country after all. Now shut your idiotic stinky pie hole UP!

[iHelptheNeeded]

More disciplined?!?! that's all you can say is more disciplined yeah. Well guess what americans are the meanest motherfuckers. HAHA we got better technology so fuck off you chink fuck. Also better trained?! haha your fucking funny man you should be a comedian.

[azkodagama]

First of all, you fucking asshole, Im not chinese, im russian. And yes Chinese and Russian soldiers are much more better trained and disciplined. By the way, if chinese technology is not that advanced even though it still can fuck up U.S., Russian technology is even better than U.S. Modern Russia is not Soviet anymore. You're just ignorant fuck nationalist. I know the facts. So STFU and eat dick.

[iHelptheNeeded]

Not really bro... Check the facts seems like you don't know anything. US is the best I don't care wtf you have to say. Russia can blow me. Patton wanted to invade russia but we said no so stfu and be happy that we didnt u russian son a bitch.

[azkodagama]

Patton is a wise man. You should've invaded Russia, but you would suffer the consequences. Russia has been a world power way before United States was, you need to check the facts. I kow my facts thats why im telling you. FYI: If you invaded Russia during Patton, you would be blown to pits. Same story today.

[iHelptheNeeded]

Not really we wouldnt have been blown to pits... Also the chinese soldiers are horribly trained. Most chinese commanders today perfer human wave tactics to anything else. The most elite chinese unties have as much experience as a green marine...

[azkodagama]

Not really.... Those "untrained" Chinese soldiers drove your ass out of North Korean peninsula, with one big push, and you couldn't do anything about it.

[seon126]

if the us invaded russia right after ww2 both would have lost both took many losses beating the germans but the us would have a slight edge becouse it had the nuke first.

[ProjectGreyX]

@seon126 don't you find it funny that we are failing hard in science and math and other countries are surpassing us yet somehow we are more technologically advanced than them ? hmmm ??

you heard it here first aliens are working with our government and giving us tech in return for using americans as their hamster pets for testing just a hunch

[seon126]

you know iraq had more experience during desert storm but a few tanks and 2000 pound bombs did the trick there

[iHelptheNeeded]

U.S active combat ready military forces: 1.5 million grunts Training quality: very good, marines go through more training than any nonspecial operations force in thw world Average Life expectancy in combat: 3 months Tanks: 4,500 tank quality: argueably the best main battle tank in the world Air forces ability to establish air superiority: very high, has established air superiority in almost all wars Aircraft quality: best in the world

[dacc69]

ok i got one take out all troups and send 10 yes i said 10 nucke and kill al iran and all people there nuke them

[AMIRsarkari]

fuck this zionist talking.Iran is a free country

[wenkz180]

The United States will only destroy and obliterate the Islamic Republic of Iran if this stooge and Holocaust denier in Tehran (Ahmadinejad) declares an all out attack against Israel. Enough said...

[oldjoe5]

Wow. That is the stupidest thing I have ever read.

[QuiksilverYo]

.. you don't know anything about this topic then...?

[DangerMouse232]

Us Will Not attack Iran..That What They Want us To Think

we will use iran against russia and china

[Persia31415926]

If USA dare to attack Iran, Iran will destroy US economy, US army in the whole world.

The USA cant even enter in the Iran air space as much Iran as the technology to destroy US planes. USA is just mighthy in illusion. the real US army is composed of cryer and soft men. Copared to the iranian army, the US is unable to do a thing.

[440sixpack1]

hey sand nigger wake up the USA can DESTROY iran via ICBMs from typhoon class subs outside their boundary, Secondly with high alt. aircraft i.e. SR-71Blackbird and the Stealth B-2, Night Hawk, and F-22 Raptor and what ever else is Stealth and Classified. Go back to school you need it.... P.S. look up the SR-76 Penitrator and the Aurora.

[Persia31415926]

lol, if usa is so mighty why do they never dare to attack Iran during this last 30 years? Because they know that they would lose this kind of war; because american governement know what Iran is able to provok; because Iran has the ability to disable american force to re-act if attacked; because Iran has the technology, the power to fight the illusion of a mighty usa... usa is every thing except mighty and your governement knows that !!! I have mercy for you poor american.

[440sixpack1]

go sit in the corner and read your useless koran and all the bullshit mohamed has lead you into a dark world of stupidity and funny cartoons. You have no idea what military might the USA has, So again go in the corner with with your koran and your race of camel shit thinking mohabs. end of story

[Persia31415926]

go sit in the corner and read your useless bible and all the bullshit jesus has lead you into a dark world of stupidity and funny cartoons. You have no idea what military might Iran has, So again go in the corner with with your bible and your race of homosexual shit thinking mohabs. end of story

[corleone1820]

you go man!!

[corleone1820]

TSK TSK.. arrogance..

[jmyelz]

Iran couldnt destroy iraq so what makes you think we couldnt destroy iran. After seeing how fast we destroyed iraq. As far as Iran technology its a joke. Iran is now tring to become nuclear what 70 years after we already did. 70 years understand. your just getting this technology now we have had it for 70 years or so. So your technology is no where near us not even close. We could destroy iran with a push of a button. Can I Iran do that to u.s.a.? Didnt think so

[corleone1820]

again, arrogance..

[tigger1972]

I agree warequals I tghink the economy is at least delaying and Iran invasion

[warequalsnofuture]

If they attack IRAN i hope the responsible people and those who kill people will suffer forever and ever in hell!

I dont believe in hell but its kind of a nice thought where i would like to see them...

[6925319]

i hope they don;t kind of thought of going there on a trip someday

[carlosdavids777]

IF USA INVADES IRAN ????

sIMPLY LOSE!

[newyorkbushi]

Idiot alert!!!!! Almost every country in the west uses nuclear power in some shape or form. The problem with Iran has nothing to do with nuclear power but all to do with money. Research it out sheeple.

[ChelNam]

The US is still salty for what Khomeini did.

[newyorkbushi]

yeah Chel you are right lol

[SaddKidd]

But what did america to Iran before Khomeini?

They brought down a legaly elected President and installed the shah. Thousands died, killed in this regime. If america would have respected the vote of the iranian people 1953 there would have been no revolution 1979.

Wer den Wind säht wird den Sturm ernten.

[FATGIRLSRHOT]

Money, giggles, Our Country can print as much money as we want to. It aint about money, its about depopulation, conglomeration, and power. Iran and U.S. are working their played game and we are the pawns. Iran and US are both in on this scheme.

I think its time to clear the chess board and stop playing their damned games. Don't fall for war unless you're willing to fall in the field of combat.

[GodwinCarpenter]

Nothing to do with money mate it's all about Israel

[maglaj1]

this guy has now idea what he is talking about stupid donkey

[Leny1777]

Aggression will only lead to more disaster not only to the Middle East but US will have problems on economic and more Terror attacks not only that China is Rising to beat the US because of the same results.

[Leny1777]

Aggression will only lead to more disaster not only to the Middle East but US will have problems on economic and more Terror attacks not only that China is Rising to beat the US because of the same results.

[theRebelBull]

The question here is why cant many of you believe in the possibility that maybe Iran wants nuclear for peace purposes? Theres no proof that Iran will be developing nuclear weapons. President Bush was the one who started this story of Iran with WMD`s. He said Iraq had WMDs and that went well didnt it?

[richter75]

The iranian dictatorship believes in the return of the 12th prophet and the end of all days, the iranian crackpot has said he want to erase israel. I rarely use inappropriate descriptions of ppl, but i think ppl like you are the most dangerous enemy of the free world; not the fanatics.

[theRebelBull]

No, Its people like you who seek out reason for war that endangers the free world. I think its obvious from your post that you dont want to prevent this war from happening.

[theRebelBull]

No, I think its people like you who seek out war that endangers the free world. There is a diplomatic alternative to the Iranian situation but its "crackpot" neocons like yourself who want war to feed your arrogance.

[hiroguam]

Richter is spot on..forget Iran...try to consider the radical islamic movement that is scattered over many parts of the globe.THEY WANT SHARIA! For you,me and everyone.Those who resist they will slaughter by SHARIA law. They are the new Nazis.

[YadaYadaguy]

im tired of you people saying your free..your not free ..your labor is taxed your land is taxed your dead is taxed everything is owed and if you dont pay they come and take your stuff and throw you in jail ...so are you free?

[richter75]

Indeed i'm free and i live in a free country, taxes is a tool, should be less could have been more its not the big deal. If you cant pay you get an apartment for free and you live on welfare. You will always have misfits that choose to stay out of the system who think they are so smart even when all the evidence points the other direction. So wake up!.

[YadaYadaguy]

my point is his ..a man and woman ..work and live life fall in love get married buy a house raise some kids and then try to retire..in todays United States they are forced to sell thier house and land cause they cant pay taxes and move to some retirement home were they wish they was young again.taxing land and labor is what we fought to break away from.sales tax.import taxes ..those are legal .labor tax and land tax(after the property is payed in full) is slavery ..just in the "law"

[stargate669]

richter you're $123 trillion dollars in debt and the only reason at present you're talking here is because China/Japan have been buoying your currency. You've lost the oil fields in the middle east, the whole world hates you and won't do business with the dollar, the petro-dollar is ending, your continual wars have bankrupted you. Your constitution has been replaced with the patriot act and HSA 1955 reduces you to a fascist country! What freedom do you have?!! You are asleep.

[richter75]

Lol, Im no american and the parrot speeches we have heard before. The EU is the one loosing against a low valued dollar..

[gnomit]

in times of globalization, when an economic superpower like the US collapses (it's happening!) it will affect everyone, not just americans, but people in all countries.

[RedPower012]

That is true but who do you think it will affect most?

[gnomit]

Who else, the poorest people in all countries. And since the richest 1% own 40% of this planet, that's a lot of people. The middle class and lower class will suffer the most, the elite will be taken care of.

[RedPower012]

What? there will be no change for the poorest people of the world. DO you think the people in Africa will feal much? Its the middle class american that has most to fear.

[newyorkbushi]

stargate is right =( and it makes me a sad panda

[lyden2006]

Hey were workin on that 'free' part. We'll get it back, by force or will.

[weslincs]

One reason why many of us "can't believe Iran wants nuclear energy for peaceful purposes" is that such an assertion is not credulous.

Why would the 2nd greatest oil producer in the world require such a source of energy? Why, moreover, would they be placing such a facility in far underground?

[Theologist]

When the Shah was in power, why did YOUR GOVERNMENT build a nuclear reactor in Iran? It's because Nuclear energy is cheaper. You can produce more, for less cost, and profit more from sales of gasoline. Your own government suggested iran do this back in the 70's.

Why place it underground? To prevent you from bombing it..since you're crazy cowboys with a hard-on for blowing stuff up. They thought ahead. :)

[EasyEs]

Look the facts are in that the types of centrifuges that are being built are used for creating a fuel that is almost exclusively used for weapons. Also when are they going to start building their nuclear plant?

[lyden2006]

I hope soon, it's about time they just slug it out and get it over with!

[Batavian188]

There is a serious problem which i do not hear this man talk about.

That is what will happen when the Iranian regime gets nuclear weapons?

Such a thing would have far reaching consequences that go far beyond Iran.

To be honest what happens to Iran and it's political situation if bombings do take place, are quite irrelevant compared to the consequences of Iran deploying nuclear weapons, for the region and the world.

[Hesam0000]

Batavian188, if Iran wants Nukes it'll get nukes, and what will happen? This will happen: US. and Israel will no longer bully Middle-east specially Iran. Iran will not attack anyone as it hasn't for centuries. Nukes will only be for defensive purposes.

[hiroguam]

Riiiight......sure.....

[Batavian188]

Hesam and Iran has a lot of friends in the world and in the region doesn't it?

What will happen is that everyone in the Middle East will start to build and deploy nuclear weapons.

Then all it takes is one screw up to unleash a nuclear armegeddon.

A nice scenario don't you think?

Also the world will still boycot and impose sanctions on Iran even if they have nukes, it does not mean your all of a sudden a friend.Quite the contrary.

[DHSNAKE]

Batavian188, WHAT HAPPENED IN CUBA UNDER KENNEDYS TIME?! IT WAS THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, THE SOVIET WAS BUILDING MISSILE SILOS THERE BUT THEY STOPPED. WHY DIDN`T THEY PROCEED? BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE STRATEGIC NUCLEAR MISSILES ARE USELESS! WHY? SINCE IT DOES SOW MUTCH DAMAGE, IF THEY ATTACK THE RESPONSE TO IT WOULD BE WITH THE SAME! SOW, HAD THEY WON ANYTHING IN THAT CASE?! LET ME DO IT EASY FOR YOU: "NNNOOO"!

GO BACK TO IRAN, IF THEY WOULD BUILD THAT MISSILE, WHAT WOULD THEY DO WITH IT?

[RedPower012]

What? You clearly dont understand the huge difference here. During the cold war USSR and USA were the two super powers. If one nuked the other it would get the same treatment back. Do you think USA will nuke Iran if Iran nukes Israel? Hell no because then EU will rip up USA if it does. Your comparison was shit. And the Russian brought in the nukes for influence.

[gnomit]

What?? First of all, Israel has nukes. If Iran nuked Israel, Israel would nuke Iran. Israel is a big place and it would take a lot of nukes to destroy all their nuclear facilities.

And even if America had to do it, the entire world would be on their side. Nuking another country is grounds for being nuked yourself, that is agreed upon by everyone, including the member countries in the EU. It doesn't matter if you are small or large.

[DHSNAKE]

i agree with "gnomit"! if any country use WMD on any other country, it will end bad! that`s why iran doesn`t wanna have strategical nukes but tactical is somthing else since it`s used for defence/attack on attacking enemy troops because of it`s minor arial impapct & much lower radioactive radiation. and iran as israel, russia or china have the right to defend it self with the best weapons available right?! eu would never attack usa since they are in the military allience nato! but russia/china?!

[bigdaddy9247]

There is no useful Nuclear program. Like saying bullets are peaceful Bullets are there to kill people. I dont care about Israel, nor Iran. But you wouldnt give a carzy kid a grenade right? I wish they would make peace but if ur gonna make war, strike the first critical blow. And Irans President even said he would "wipe Israel of the face of the map" he is lucky Israel doesnt just do them in now..

[Hesam0000]

No one said "Nuclear bombs are useful". Nuclear power generators are clean, powerful and efficient source of electricity for Iran's future.

"You wouldn't give a crazy kid a grenade?"

What would you call Bush-father giving little Bush the control of American army?!

Don't tell me you believed that translation of ahmadinejad "wipe israel" comment!

Even wikipedia cleared that lie.

But they have been open and clear about it, that they're against "cruel zionist regime" and their arab genocide.

[rv4lif]

what happens? all hell breaks lose.

ps: please subcribe to me.

[grayboy61]

Is Reese Erlich working for the Ron Paul presidential campaign now?

[hiroguam]

Monkeyfire is very astute. Iran is a theocracy run by Mullahs,and they control the military. Iran is nearly like Japan 65 years ago when everyone beleived the Emperor was a god.The difference is that Iran has not begun to expand its might by invasion,but by covert action and financial support of Muslim fanatics.

[YadaYadaguy]

iran is doing nothing to the United States and Israel isn't part of our country yet AIPAC is all off in our goverment..CFR would love to get us into none stop warfare as well..what about comeing home is such a bad idea..why do we still have bases in germany..bolivia.why !its time to come home and rebuild the United States..

[Rickdeckard2020]

Exactly instead of spending billions in Bagdad, the US should build digs worthy of the name and rebuild New Orleans. The last I heard, there are still digs that wont even hold against the next large huricane that hits New O.

[YadaYadaguy]

yeah thats what im talking about why do we send billions of dollars to places that dont even pay taxes while people taht do pay taxes suffer...we could get more education for our citzens provide better healthcare for our citzens.

[hiroguam]

Yeah fine lets try it ! Then after you will see how Jihadis around the world will just pack up their camels and return to their peaceful Sharia ways. Keep on smokin' your shit....until they cut your throat.Don't worry...BE HAPPY !

[Rickdeckard2020]

No, the Iran hysteria is the exact same propaganda used to grease up the haliburton gravy train and war bandwagon express to Iraq. I had a hard time beleiving people could be fooled by Bush's lies the first time around, but anyone fooled twice should be ashamed(and offered lithium) and have their folly challenged.

[monkeyfire087]

This is where you go from being a ration adversary to being a crazy person who is no fun to talk to, I am tired of this Bush is satan crap, this is like the millionth time I have heard it and it is just as crazy as the first time.

[skatebawd]

platitude after platitude. i agree

[wingedlightning]

U.S. must prevent other powers from becoming super powers...perhaps the question should be do you want another country to become the superpower that is a part of our destiny < what would they do to the rest of the world including us americans?

There's nothing wrong with U.S. leading the world as a superpower...all americans need to come to realistic terms. with this question before anything else.

[monkeyfire087]

I will admit that it is best for the United States if it is the only super power, however that is not what my argument is based on it is based on the fact that fanatics with nuclear weapons leads to a situation that is bad for every one, and preventing that situation may involve war with Iran

[Rickdeckard2020]

The US media is probably not telling you this but most people in the rest of the world see the US/UK/Israel axis as the most dangerous axis that threathen world peace (like Nazi germany in the 30s).

Only people in this axis see Iran as a threat because of the war propaganda, everyone else it totally unafraid since Iran has not carpet bombed or invaded anyone.

[YadaYadaguy]

are you kidding me look at isreal have you heard the words being spoken by those nuts? they had 230nuclear missles in 1981 (last time they let inspectors check) theyhave never sighned any treatys stateing they wont use them either lol wake up tot he real danger..its not the guy with one bomb that will kill us all but the retarded racist religions with hundreds,.

[wingedlightning]

Iran is in fact a threat which like all threats if left unchecked could lead to greater conflicts within the middle east in the next 3-6 years.

While there are vast over spending costs that have arisen due to Iraq and Afgan. operations the war on terror is a fact...it is not a hoax nor a sham/scam...we live in a world that like before ww1 & ww2 is very much at risk of going the way of a new world war conflict...unless we own up to the fact that

[franktremb]

I hope nobody will get fooled by the neocons again.

[monkeyfire087]

Yes lets label and ridicule the people who disagree with us instead of adressing there argument. I mean serously why should I think about the opinions of conservatives I mean it is not like they are Human beings or any thing.

[edbrown100]

Israel would get her "A Clean Break"

The Iran Oil Bourse would no longer sell oil in euros, but petrodollars

Iran's oil would be privatized by United States companies, not to benefit Americans, but only the CEOs & boards of directors.

[Rickdeckard2020]

"Israel would get her "A Clean Break"

The Iran Oil Bourse would no longer sell oil in euros, but petrodollars

Iran's oil would be privatized by United States companies, not to benefit Americans, but only the CEOs & boards of directors.

"

Good points

[yourcamden]

the blood of the world children in your gas tank, a bit like a modern Aztec sacrifice.

[superfisto]

5/5

[monkeyfire087]

No One really wants to Bomb Iran, but it may be something that we may have to do, and The major problem I have with video is that makes it seem that Iran or any other enemy of The United States is invinsable and we can do nothing to hurt them, We could criple them for the next hundred years if half of the country were not cowards and defeatest.

[Rickdeckard2020]

Iran an enemy of the US? Are you kidding, the USSR posed a threat as a superpower but they didnt attack, Iran is hardly even a power on the other side of the earth and they as yourcamden popinted havent invaded anyone.

In fact its the US that supported Saddam. Its the US thats toppled their elected gov for Oil and placed a dictator Shah.

[Rickdeckard2020]

Iran poses no threat, your comments are wanton warmongering, fostering war crimes and almost an accessory to mass murder. People were fooled by the Lies that lead to the Iraq War, dont count on any saberrattling BS to pass this time around

[monkeyfire087]

You don't Think That Extemist muslims who want to kill us and are not afraid to die in the process pocessing nuclear weapons is a threat. Also calling me a warmonger is just dumb, I said that I don't want to attack Iran, but unless something changes there is not a lot of other options.

[monkeyfire087]

We supported The Shah and Saddam because at the time they were the lesser of two evils. The reason we did not attack The Soviet Union is because they were a super power with Nuclear weapons. the reason we would attack Iran is that it would be catistrphic if a Extremest Islamic state were to gain nuclear weapons.

[Rickdeckard2020]

You did not attack USSR or North Korea because they had nukes, no wonder many country want nukes as a deterant to the country that has bombed millions of people since WW2(the US). Iran has not bombed millions of people half-way across the world, they are less extremists than Saudis, 911 was mostly by Saudis, the rethoric about the Iran threat is not credible

[monkeyfire087]

true they are less extreme, but saudis are not trying to develop nukes, their armed forces although well equiped are still some of the worst trained in the world, they do not pose a major threat Iran does. also I find it disturbing that you do not know the difference between conventional millitary force and terrorism.

[Rickdeckard2020]

'that you do not know the difference between conventional millitary force and terrorism.'

can you eloborate on why you perceive that i dont know the difference?

(on the other hand its true one of the difference is buget, give a terrorist an ICBM and I bet hell push the button instead of straping a belt and commit suicide)

[monkeyfire087]

Conventional millitary force is attacking non-civial targets with a millitary or political goal, terrorism targets civilians and the goal is terrify & kill people.

[Rickdeckard2020]

'Conventional millitary force is attacking non-civial targets with a millitary or political goal, terrorism targets civilians and the goal is terrify & kill people.'

that difference is abitrary imo since terrorists also have politival goals without the means of conventional warfare. The IRA started a peace process when they had a political wing with prospects to reach political goals. again imo

[Rickdeckard2020]

Iran? 'A major threat'? oh come on. I hope theyre paying you at least, you cant be serious.

So you buy the whole War on Terror hoax. Its a sham, it replaces the cold war to justify huge expenditures, corporate welfare, war, cracking down on freedom, etc its not even meant to be won, as Smedley Butler would say War is a Racket and war on terror is scam

[monkeyfire087]

You wound me, I am not being paid. and yes I am serious. I am saying this of my own free will, I do not believe that every thing is a hoax and that nothing is as it appears because I am rational not paranoid. some times things are as exactly as they appear.

[Scurvous]

Can somone please enlighten me. I haven't heard anyone of any reputation suggest that invading Iran would be a good idea.

[yourcamden]

Not only would a US terror attack unite Iranians inside of Iran, it would unite many Persians outside. Fact: Iran has not invaded any country for more than three hundred years unlike the US who have invaded more than 72 different countries since the end of World War II.

[monkeyfire087]

A conventional millitary attack that targets Millitary,Ifistructure, and Goverment centers is not a terror attack. A terror attack targets civilians and is ment to cause fear among the general public. and as far as Iran not invading any one for 300 years that is because they have not had the power to do so.

[yourcamden]

Like the US use of the two atomic bombs in Japan?

[monkeyfire087]

Aparently you have never heard of justifed use of Force, The use of the atomic bombs lead to less death than if Japan had been invaded, A conservative estiments places US death toll at one million and japanese at 5 million. only 250,000 Japanese died in the bomings and no americans.

[Hottides]

Civil servants (i.e. CIVILIANS) die in 'conventional military attacks'. Civilians in neighboring areas also perish through 'collateral damage'. I'm no pacifist; I'm a realist. The USA and allies may ultimately have to neutralize Iran through such an attack. However, let's take whatever action's required rationally, no BS. War means murder of civilians, period!

[yourcamden]

Unlike the USA, Iran has never used the atomic bomb nor has it invaded 72 different countries since 'the end' of World War II. If both Pakistan and Israel have this weapon, Iran would every right to own it. Hopefully all three countries will follow the example of South Africa and give them up.

[Hottides]

'Rights' is a legal concept that has no meaning regarding nuclear proliferation. What matters is that unstable regimes driven by religious mania (i.e. Iran) aren't permitted to threaten the world with nuclear annihilation. BTW, maybe S. Africa should have kept its nuclear capacity. For the sake of parity, a stable Black African nuclear power should exist alongside Western and Asian ones.

[Rickdeckard2020]

'What matters is that unstable regimes driven by religious mania (i.e. Iran) aren't permitted to threaten the world with nuclear annihilation.'

Iran is not unstable nor athreat. Its more stable than Pakistan and although elections are imperfect its more democratic as well. In fact the US has no lessons to give when it comes to democratic elections.

its the US that poses the greatest threat of anihilating the human race, weve been a heartbeat away from nuclear war on 3 occasions

[monkeyfire087]

You are right that they are stable, but they are are also Islamic extrremest, so even thought they are stable they are still a threat. I will not even debate the whole election thing because it is a waste of my time.

[YadaYadaguy]

they are only a threat to us if we keep bases in sudia arbia ,Iraq..many other nations 160nations around the world have united states bases...why are we acting like romans...romans went broke and died..is americans really wanting this?

[Rickdeckard2020]

Good video. Im surprised. I agree with pretty much everything he says.