So we've gone from 'vivisection is unscientific' to 'there's a big conspiracy and racket keeping vivisection afloat'. Ok then enjoy your delusions but things never work that way in the real world.
@FatherTime89 They keep it around for money, people think that animals are alot alike them, do you compare yourself to a dog? No. Do you have a dog's coat? No. Do you have a dog's sensitive hearing? No. Sensitive eyes? No. Are you immune to aids like a chimp? No. People THINK it works, because the greed of product owners makes them use deception and evil. The key word is THINK, people do not KNOW it works, which it does not.
@yaymejkok4 If animal testing had no benefits then what possible benefit would the greedy corporate guys have for continuing to do it. And before you give me some huge conspiracy please consider occam's razor.
@FatherTime89 People get the idea that if drugs are tested on simply SOMETHING, it is safe. People are drowned into lies, which earns the drug companies more money than lost. Makes sense once you use your brain more, doesn't it?
@FatherTime89 Well, they can do computer modeling that's 98.9% accurate to humans, rather than 85.5% accurate. The EPA always checks for testing, so there isn't a way around it.
@FatherTime89 I don't know the name of it, but Elisebeth Arden does her cosmetic testing by computer models. They can make a "computer cancer" then test it on artificial cells/artificial body.
Moral dilemma, on one hand, you know that the capitalist system will never allow the common man/men to take down one of its biggest providers, and any action you take against them will be futile. On the other hand, you know that if you do nothing, your no different than the people performing the vivisections. So, what to do?
Why do I conclude that these testers would also take pride in harming people as well...they seem sadistic enough..
Why test cosmetics on animals just so your 15 year old whore can prance around on street, get knocked up, and shit out more people.
peinsama666 1 year ago
So we've gone from 'vivisection is unscientific' to 'there's a big conspiracy and racket keeping vivisection afloat'. Ok then enjoy your delusions but things never work that way in the real world.
FatherTime89 2 years ago
@FatherTime89 This actually answers many of my questions about vivisetcion, I want to get a good solid answer on why it's still around.
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 If a lot of people didn't think it'd work it would go away.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 They keep it around for money, people think that animals are alot alike them, do you compare yourself to a dog? No. Do you have a dog's coat? No. Do you have a dog's sensitive hearing? No. Sensitive eyes? No. Are you immune to aids like a chimp? No. People THINK it works, because the greed of product owners makes them use deception and evil. The key word is THINK, people do not KNOW it works, which it does not.
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 If animal testing had no benefits then what possible benefit would the greedy corporate guys have for continuing to do it. And before you give me some huge conspiracy please consider occam's razor.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 The benefit:money. End of disscussion.
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 Where is the money coming from? The drug companies who would get no benefit if animal testing was useless?
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 People get the idea that if drugs are tested on simply SOMETHING, it is safe. People are drowned into lies, which earns the drug companies more money than lost. Makes sense once you use your brain more, doesn't it?
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 Then why not just do no testing or fake tests, it would save them even more money.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 WEll, would you buy a prodct if it said: no testing done whatsoever. CAUTION: Could be radioactive?
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 Well it would make a great prank. Although they can always do cheaper tests that don't give results or just lie about doing any testing.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 Well, they can do computer modeling that's 98.9% accurate to humans, rather than 85.5% accurate. The EPA always checks for testing, so there isn't a way around it.
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4
Which computer model could they use?
FatherTime89 1 year ago
@FatherTime89 I don't know the name of it, but Elisebeth Arden does her cosmetic testing by computer models. They can make a "computer cancer" then test it on artificial cells/artificial body.
yaymejkok4 1 year ago
@yaymejkok4 People use animal testing for more than just cancer.
FatherTime89 1 year ago
Thank you so much! I am currently writing a paper for Lit. class vivisection and this has been such a helpful video! Thanks again!
LicianDragon 2 years ago
Moral dilemma, on one hand, you know that the capitalist system will never allow the common man/men to take down one of its biggest providers, and any action you take against them will be futile. On the other hand, you know that if you do nothing, your no different than the people performing the vivisections. So, what to do?
Skul1z 2 years ago
great vids!watched them all.
stuudent00 3 years ago 3
This is brilliant! Thanks for posting this. Everybody should see this.
stephjuhler999 3 years ago 3
thank you for posting this above many other videos this is a sane and easy to understand video
that does not try to play on my emotions or show pictures of things that i dont really understand
it has many facts that i will think about for a long time
iwannanothetruth 3 years ago 7
THank you for posting ! It will be forwarded to everyone
worldchaser 3 years ago 6
Thank you so very much for putting this 5 part series on YouTube. It is real ... people out there need to see this.
I have put this in my playlist and i will share this with anyone who will listen.
DianeDi 3 years ago 3