Added: 4 years ago
From: tommarques
Views: 166,305
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (570)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • im not a fan of the dudes singing but the background vocals and of course the instruments are perfect!

  • definitivamente no tiene voz para cantar una cancion de the beatles como corresponde!!!

  • I adore this

  • "She's leaving comb." - John Lennon wrote this song about a girl enduring chemo treatments. It is not about a runaway. I am a Beatles Historian in my spare time. I am the Director of Beatles Acquisitions at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California. Please learn the truth.

  • The famous Fat Gay (it isn't guy, it's gay) and his Fat Backing Vocals... too bad

  • @erickmdm id pork both girls just for the hell of it

  • singing is terrible.

  • I really like this song, and of course no one can live up to the beatles, but these guys are amazing.

  • Simple horrible!

  • The orchestrations were absolutely perfected! The lead singer on the other hand was kind of hurting it for me though, Needs a bolder voice, Was a little flat on many notes and also doesn't hold his notes long enough on some parts.

  • Adoro a los Magic Numbers, y esta canción más... Pero aún más a los Beatles

  • I think the people knocking this must have a dislike for the band. It's just a great performance. Don't be so bitter.

  • I don't really know why people would dislike this :S Maybe the beatle's version is better because.. well, you know, they were terrific, and they made the song, so obviously the cover won't be better than the original. But, it's ok, every point of view is welcome.

  • I think this is a stunning rendition, beautiful and haunting. I think the others are all good versions - this is my favourite, sung just how I think it should be. Thank you guys.

  • Not to be rude or anything, but I really did not like this version. Lovely Rita from Travis was a lot better, Sgt. Peppers Reprise from Stereophonics, even Razorlight's W/ a little help from my friends, but this version lacks the feeling Paul had with the lead vocals and the rest with the chorus. That's my opinion.

  • why cant people just respect everyone's music even if it isn't to there taste. i for one think that this version is amazing, imagine how hard it must be to cover a song from the most famous bands in the world. you haters don't like it doesn't sound like the original, that's all.

  • Diarrhea squirting out of my ass sounds better than this guy...

  • @silentyp3 Lovely!!

  • Nice :) the instrument are again spot on.

  • This fat pokemon voice makes me laugh...

  • It might not be the best cover (obviously), but it still gave me chills. It'll take more than this to do damage to a song as amazing this. All in all, though, I thought it was actually a quite good cover. I only miss Paul and John's voice.

  • this can't be real!! :-D

  • Not to be a dick but this shit sucked! I'd rather listen to a dying dog!

  • c'mon guys im a huge beatles fan and i think its good after all its a "cover"

  • hicieron pedazos la cancion ....

  • i'll compere this to buying a can of strong larger only to find the contents has been replaced with piss

  • ?????....What da f@@k......

  • i think the voice quite ok, if its add some fuckin echoes..not too bad mate.

  • he sings like a girl xD

    

  • Ok. Who the hell let them ruin such an awesome song?

  • Not very good, but I kinda like it

  • this is a really funny joke guys. hahahahah!

  • I think this is a pile of shit.

  • why couldn't one of the girls do the main voice. God I hope I never allow myself to destroy a Bealtes tune like this.

  • the magic numbers are english, how?

  • Not the worst cover, not the best...

  • Sounds a little limp in the wrist.

  • B4 you criticise - let's hear your version...

  • It's weird but... I read the bad comments as I listen to this and... Nope, I can't hate it! I really like it... =/

  • Excelent

  • this is the shittest version of the song.

  • @edobb001 couldnt have said it better myself

  • At first I was like "Woman's a Great singer" Then....

    I found out it was a man

  • hurley!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • ahhahaaahhaahahha voice shit

  • I so thought that was a woman singing.

  • voce maschile flaccida, povera e SPESSO CALANTE!

  • fuck you guys i think its cool and unique

  • it's moments like these you see why the beatles were so good

  • It is really awful. I keep asking to myself why these guys have been given the honor to do this.

  • It is really awful.

  • that is awful.

  • It's a good try at a classic. Think you can do better? Well do it then!

    D~

  • @Dunwyche it's not the instrumentalists or even the back vocalists... it's the MAIN vocalist. i honestly hoped that he was she. smh.

  • this sucks WTF

  • well i like it .......

  • i managed to grit my teeth through the damn thing, lost at 3:20 damnit!!!

  • I raged at 0:00

  • Fire your singer. He is like being ear castrated. HORRIBLE.

  • Terrible vocals. Absolutely terrible.

  • gay ass singer.

  • so many negative comments..... forgot how many off you are perfect!!!!!

  • I'm sure he's a great singer, but he wasn't the right singer for this song. Maybe if he didn't try to sing in his falsetto he would have done better, who knows. The harp and backup singers were great though.

  • blew taht one...WTF!!!!...Let me sing that shit..This guy can't hold a note in a bucket

  • Jesus. Fine until the singing. Paused at 0:16 never to resume

  • fantastic interpretation. A beatles fan, LIVERPOOL

  • All these negative comments! I think that this is an excellent cover. To say that he sounds like an infant is simply not being able to appreciate what I would describe as "an innocence" in his voice. To me this this is a very endearing feature.

  • beautiful voice

  • It isnt that the guys voice isnt suited to the song. It's that HE CANT SING AT ALL!!!!!

  • thought that was a woman who was singing

  • he sounds like an infant

  • this song is very very very dificult to sing¡¡¡

  • Oh my god... that guy's voice..... fucked up the WHOLE SONG

  • This is just amazing!

  • I thought Edith Bunker was singing at firdt

  • this is terrible haha

  • i thought the intro voice was a woman.

  • chorus and instrumentals is amazing, though beatles doesnt really work in thick, american acsents..

  • @brunesmask in no way are any of them american

  • @ROLLBLUNT94 just found out.. but they surtenly have one funky english accent, though!

  • Si solo van a aplaudir los covers que pretenden ser copias identicas de las orginales entonces no hay mas que decir. Entiendan que esta es la INTERPRETACION de una misma cancion con otras personas y por lo tanto otro estilo. Si no les gusta, solo den click en "Atras" y listo.

  • The dude on the mixer is like "oh for fuck sake..."

  • @merrett lmfao

  • @merrett haha

  • @merrett thats geoff emerick. he was the engineer for the beatles. its shameful that he had to deal with this shit

  • @merrett That dude's name is Geoff Emerick. He was the original recording engineer on the original Sgt Pepper. Just a bit of trivia for you :D

  • wow!!! the best instrumental.... because the voice.....  sorry....:(

  • "The string section and back up vocals are heavenly," says Paul Abdul

  • just watched a true classic being murdered… what a horrible start to a wednesday! maybe even worse than the one described in mccartney's song…

    :(

  • superb... just superb

  • This fat bastard sings like a gay.

  • the singer must own the studio

  • very beautiful!

  • The voice is very strange!!!!!!

  • touching

  • the magic numbers are fucking shit

  • excellente cuarteto de cuerdas, great job

  • the singer's man/woman

  • is it a girl with beard?

  • One occasion where auto tune is needed for the vocal - or a real singer

  • Oh God... They're stabbing Paul's back... I agree with the down dude: The instrumental is perfect... It's identical to the Sgt. Peppers...

  • Good song mi canal tiene videos de lo beatles

  • Ah ,real instruments , makes all the difference,

    This aint bad has some of the feel of the original

  • i like it.

  • Fail

  • oooooooooooomg what the fuck

  • i laughed when I heard the singing

  • @Autobot71Ironhide i laughed more when i saw the guy singin'

  • Its the Kevin Smith version!

  • no ...no no no no .......no

  • RUINED BY THIS FUCKING GUY

  • theyre really not very good singers, are they?

  • I would agree with everyone that this is a good cover except for the fact that he's really flat on a lot of notes.

  • This cover is sort of an acquired taste.

    Of course, no one will ever compare to the original.

    But I listened to this a few times, and grew to like it.

    No one beats The Beatles, but hey.

    This is this band's interpretation of a wonderful song, and you guys should respect that. If you don't, then go listen to the original and stop complaining.

  • The debate between the stereo version and the mono version of this song is over. This version is by far the worst interpretation of the song yet.

  • "That fat guy sounds like such a fag" Wow you are not at all ignorant are you???

  • He does sound like a fag. I thought it was a chick at first til i saw him

  • i fckin love this cover

  • this is an immense cover !

  • That fat guy sounds like such a fag ensensuating every "S"

  • I would say you sound ignorant but his "S"s really are annoying.

  • why do these girls make these grimaces?

  • You have to listen to some original Magic Numbers to appreciate their style; they're an awesome band and this is a great cover.

  • why does this guy sound like such a bitch

  • that guy... ruins the rest of the cover. just my opinion I guess... I am a crappy singer and I could do better.

  • why the singer is so....

  • it would be better if it was just the band not the fat guy :P

  • this is the best song on the album...and these guys cover it?! Maybe I'm missing something, but me and my friends could do better than this at any karaoke bar

  • wow what a little bitch singing. all the rest is like completely accurate

  • could have put some real singers

  • if you dont like it then go listen to the real thing, people love it and wanna sing it, can't blame them for that

  • A for effort.

  • this is one of the best covers i ever heard ;D

  • wow what an excellent cover sung with real feeling well done you guys .

  • DA FUCK?! That was Gash!

  • What the f*ck was that ??? The only thing that sounds remotely good was the orchestra.

    My farts are more in tune than his voice!!!!

  • ouch!

  • I keep asking to myself how can be this possible. Abbey Road Studios, Sgt Pepper's, BBC, 40 years... and they call this sucker to destroy a song! I am really disappointed.

  • Just amazing.....so sensitive

    sung with more feeling than the origianal

    and Im a huge beatles fan

  • The Beatles Would be so happy to hear this from you guys WOW!

  • If a listener is comparing the singing with Paul McCartney's... then that is absolutely wrong!.

    Romeo Stodart is doing an excellent cover pretty different of the creator.

    OUT OF TUNE???... come on guy!!!

    if you don't have something to say just say you don't like ... but he is not out of tune.

  • The instrumental is just PERFECT... what sacrifices the song is the dude´s voice.

  • Absolutely agree. His voice is just.. unpleasant and strangely femanine.

  • @takingoveragain Too Right! The voice is not worthy of the tune or the arrangement!

  • I like it.

    Its just what a cover should be... you should hear the original in it, but the things that make it belong to the artist doing the tune.

    I like his voice, if I had mixed it I may have taken it down *just a bit* but other then that... I really like this.

  • disgraceful

  • Never heard of them.

  • your loss mate

  • i was surprised that this band is english after hearing the guys voice

  • me too. i could have sworn he was from San Fransisco

  • It sounds absolutely out of key...

  • Beutiful cover, In my opinion they did more than justice to the original...

    Why are people talking about levels? theyre fine.

    Why would you want to swamp that subtle vocal in reverb?

    Echo/Reverb isnt magic dust you know.

    Its perfect as it is, levels and all.

    ...also bare in mind it is a TV recording, NOT a studio recording (you know what I mean), it has passed through the harsh broadcast compression for this wont be an entirely true reproduction of what was recorded to tape.

  • the vocal needs to be more echoed and turned down. it ruins it. i don't think he has the right voice for this song.

  • Out of tune on the major part of the song...

  • Normally he has a good voice but just doesn't fit this awesome song

  • his voice completes my life.

  • Vocal to loud.

  • This a awesome song ... The story behind this is well sad ... Generally good cover though x

  • What song are they listening too my god this is an awesome cover,Take the cotton wool out of your ears and listen properly.Or is it just you dont have 2 brain cells to rub together to make a spark of a thought

  • beautiful, timeless, priceless tune

    killed by lousy vocals.

    good lord.

  • Ghastly vocals.

  • I'm not sure if you were actually trying to say anything, because I got completely lost amidst all your profanity. Talk like an adult.

  • stupid

  • Fucking brilliant, nice job Magic Numbers!

    D~

  • I love the harmonizing of the girls

  • i feel like a demented snuggle bear is lulling me to sleep....so he can rape me. weird effin voice.

  • love the female backing vocals for some reason though

  • That's some of the funniest shit I've ever read LOL

  • Comment removed

  • his voice is SOOOOOOO gayy

  • yeah. absolutely gay

  • I love The magic numbers! They're not as good as the beatles obviously, but it's a really good version. They are truly talented.

  • SCARY SHIT, his voice is not really meant for this song. Just doesn't work for a Beatles' song...

  • fucking clas

  • wow everything was great except him... just butchered the song

  • sooooo weird!

  • His singing is pitch perfect, but he's not a trained vocalist, has no sustain.

  • lol

  • this sucks

  • nice song, nice performance