Everyone accepts there is genetic difference retards. The point is that you racists assume that the differences makes us (whites) superiour to other races. Espesially because of out intelligence level. No, fuck that. There are plenty of black people that are way smarter then white people, and its like that for every "race".
Bottom line of this whole race iq stuff is that is the moral aspect that, weither genetic drift in colder climates tend to intelligent speciation or not, it still does not justify discrimination in multi-cultural societies/countries, at least I don't see how it does.
I mean Russia is a very large, white, unicultural, country, and they do not have an immigration problem, yet they are still racist to the handful of foreigners. White nationalists could just immigrate to Russia, problem solved.
@iobroful thats the whole point, if you actually listen to the video, claiming that all people are innately equal justifies discrimination against more successful groups, and hereditarianism isnt the same as white nationalism
@iobroful You are very wrong. Growing tension is caused by immigration from the Caucasus and the far east. Russians and ukranians only account for about 80% of the total population, the rest are muslims and far east asians. militant nationalism always has a source, and the source is usually immigration or other issues related to ethnicity or religion.
@dringles if moving from one place inside of a country to another city trying to find a job is considered immigration then.... you finish the sentence. Newsflash: Russian population is actually declining/aging. migration rate over past 5 years is below 0.1 %. You are really the worst kind (of racist): not even a little bit of factual accuracy, or creativity, or humor.
@iobroful Why dont you look up the demographics yourself. Even left wing biased wikipedia states that Russians and ukranians make up about 82% of the population combined. I have never stated that the russian population is not declining, you are strawmanning.
The fact is that Russia has experienced a lot of immigration, legal and illegal, in the last 10 or so years. So where is your factual accuracy, or are you just a humourless racist?
Also, I will interject ONE serious point. People talk about the Neanderthal equation but they do NOT talk about the Cro-Magnon equation. I firmly believe they play a role in the Genetics of Modern Human also.
@fringeelements Mainstream sources say Neanderthals conferred some important traits on humans (ex-Africans). That's a dangerous linkage to draw, because Neanderthals had large brains. Hybridization may have given us more intelligence. If so, Africans missed out on this beneficial genetic infusion. At the very least, Neanderthal DNA establishes a clear genetic line between Africans and non-Africans for purposes of racial classification based not on social construction.
@LibertarianRealist what about the asian-white bell curve gap? Did asians have more fertile offspring with neanderthals? That would be interesting because according to Rushton caucasoids are sexually more active than are mongoloids. Moreover, the classic neanderthal range is from europe to iran, that is where they primarily were. Whites should have higher iq's than do asians if neanderthal interbreeding had significant effect on iq.
@iobroful there was also selection for intelligence from the environment that people lived in, which probably explains how northeast asians are smarter than southeast asians and europeans are smarter than arabs and south asians
@hobosmurf according to Rushton youtube.com/watch?v=YKAYodwVAcQ&feature=related @ 6:43 South east asians are 105 and higher than europe.
But anyway, it is environment and not Neanderthal influence, because Africans are smarter than australian natives (according to Rushton's map) and people migrated out of africa (as most of us agree).
@iobroful oh yeah, is it this link? /watch?v=1QOtsSj1chg
the link doesnt work.
although australoids also have admixture from a type of humans called denisovans, whether thats significant or not we probably wont be allowed to know, just like with neanderthals
IIRC, the Asian bell-curve is narrower than both Caucasoid and Negroid curves, so it would make sense for their being more intelligent on average to be a result of a genetic bottleneck wrt intelligence.
@bombkangaroo Actually there's no evidence for differently sized bell-curves among any of the races. It's important to note that East Asians shows a different pattern of intelligence, that is East Asians scores higher on visuo-spatial test but lower on verbal test compared to Whites.
Yes there is. That's what the available data on IQ tests tells us. If we plot it on a graph we see a wider distribution of IQ scores for Whites than Asians.
@bombkangaroo No there isn't, at least none that Steve Hsu or I can: tinyurl*.*com/7vfsy5p
I know LibertarianRealist and others have claimed there are or at least the possibility of differences in IQ variance, but there's just no evidence for it.
Yes there is. Ignoring actual psychometrics in favour of much more abstract measures that are influenced by an even greater number of variables does nothing to falsify the psychometric tests.
@bombkangaroo I'm not ignoring psychometics, the point is Steve Hsu did his own analysis and couldn't find any differences in variances only means. I'm just saying I have never seen any evidence for differences of SD for East Asian and Whites. If you can point to to some, that will be nice.
@LibertarianRealist for the best counter-argument to the out of africa theory read the excellent 2008 book 'Erectus Walks Amongst Us' by Richard D Fuerle which is free to read online. The book also details many interesting differences between the world's races. There are more people questioning the line about us evolving from chimps in Africa, with a link to orangutans in south east asia once again looking credible.
@LibertarianRealist about the big brains of neanderthals - bear in mind that the europeans who co-existed with neanderthals (the cro-magnons) had brains larger than both neanderthals and any of today's ethnic groups. The average European brain has been shrinking steadily since the ice age ended 10,000 years ago - probably because only the smartest could thrive in such harsh conditions, a selective pressure which has gone.
This Bolshevik blimp, culture destroyer sounds like the Lucky Charms leprechaun, looks like General Burkhalter and has the petty Marxist anger of Keith Olbermann. Not a good combination.
@mantle64 Hahaha...please, everyone, stop with the fat insults! Even though yours was good, there are fat and ugly people on our side, too, whose ideas should be judged on their own merits.
At the end when he folds back and holds his head, it looks as if he is emotionally exhausted by it all. He may be genuinely angered at it all, but he gave no logical arguments, so it wasn't that, so it must be that he is actually exhausted with all the BS he just spouted. It hurt me just to listen to him.
"It does not matter if there are differences in intelligence." It does not matter to you. Presumably because you don't have any.
"What matters is what would you do with this information IF it was proven."
The variance in abilities of differing ethnic and racial groups when it comes to performance in IQ tests has been proven to be beyond question. How closely one correlates this with the concept of "intelligence" remains somewhat subjective.
"What matters is what would you do with this information"
No, what matters to YOU is what is done with this with this information, which is proven.
I can choose to ignore it, I can choose to attempt incorporate it in any number of proposals or arguments. What a race realist is unlikely to EVER do, however, is to employ it to the nefarious purposes which underpin your own cloistered bigotry.
LibReal has fatty pegged. Hook, line and fucking sinker.
I don't see any point for people, such as the guy to whom you responded, to make videos of that nature. It's not like they're going to make us exceptionally angry or change our minds by calling us stupid or racist or psychoanalyzing us (something that Hannibal did already). Perhaps it's just jerk-off material for egalitarians.
I'm not really a white supremacist. I think that the white race is the best race, FOR ME. But I think a black person could probably make a good case for why the black race is the best race FOR HIM. I'd like egalitarians to acknowledge this distinction, I suppose you might call it "white preferentialism" rather than "white supremacism". Seriously though, if you value the things we value (knowledge, progression, civilisation), how could you NOT think the white race is the best?
Does the polar bear or the bald-headed Eagle worry about the "supremacy" of European man? Only when European man impinges on his environment. And so only when peoples are afforded a real sense of an ability to self-determine will this nonsense end.
Nature made races different. He who refuses to acknowledge the will of nature deserves no place within it.
One thing that always amuses me is that the kind of people who most loudly sing the praises of racial diversity just happen to be the very same people who splutter with indignation at any suggestion of racial differences. The irony inherent in their position completely eludes them.
Native americans from north america have similar genetic markers to north eastern asians than any other ethnic population and yet their IQ as a group is more similar to that of african americans than it is to people of asian descent. As far as africans supposedly being more aggressive than whites and asians because of genetics, provide a source that confirms this claim that isn't by Rushton or Lynn.
@Pentazoid111 "provide a source that confirms this claim that isn't by Rushton or Lynn." Even if we did, what's to stop you from just calling those researchers "racist"?
@DKshad0w You have me confuse for someone else. I care about facts, I am not swayed by political ideology when it comes to science , unlike many of the so called race realists on youtube , who make assertions that are not backed by science. The majority of the race realist proponents are affiliated with a political ideology, usually ethnic nationalism, most race realists aren't scientists. You won't see scientists advocate race realism like they advocate the theory of natural selection
@Pentazoid111 If you care about facts, then it shouldn't matter where the facts come from. And no, claiming that Ruston, Lynn or anyone else that by having a political ideology their sources can't be trusted is a genetic fallacy. It's also an ad-hominem fallacy.
@DK I read Rushton's papers and I read Race , eVolution and behavior and for both his papers and the book , he references himself a lot and he references old and now outdated sources. Many of the references he uses are not scientific and his methodology where he asked black , whites and asian students about their personal sex life was also flawed. it does matter if you are President of an organization, where past presidents of that org. advocated that all blacks be shipped to africa
@Pentazoid111 This is what I see when people criticizes Rushton's work. They attack the more objectionable parts while ignoring the totality of the evidence. Rushton also cited sources showing differences in: two-egg twinning, maturation rates, head size, number of cortical neurons. Critics conveniently ignore those. Rushton do use old sources, but he does so to show a pattern, he does use newer sources to vindicate old data. Like the correlation between headsize and IQ with MRI data.
@DKshad0w Rushton uses data of the average brain sizes between blacks and whites that confirms his hypothesis, but selectively ignores the other data on brain size. There is data on brain size differences by jerlson that shows africans have a larger brain than whites did in their sample . Most modern studies on brain size and race find little to no noticeable differences between blacks and whites as well as asians. Read papers by tobias, D Cain and lieberman
@Pentazoid111 Can you give me the name of those papers by Tobias, D Cain and Lieberman. You know the charge of cherry picking can go both ways right?
Here's a paper by J. Philippe Rushton and Elizabeth W. Rushton summarizing racial IQ and brain differences and also address some of the critisism from Lieberman, Graves, ect. tinyurl*.*com/889977x
@Pentazoid111 Here, shut up, sit down' listen, don't respond, I don't care what you think, I've already heard it 100x on LR's comment sections anyway, just go to your library and try getting an ILL on "Race" by John Baker and "External Morphology of the Primate Brain" by Cornelius Connolly.
@DeltaNordicAdvance That paper is over 60 years old . Look at the paper from Tobias where he surveys all of the measurement of the brain size of different races from past studies and present studies and he comes to the conclusions that the MAJORITY of measurment samples on the brain size of the individuals show no noticeable differences or no differences at all. Updated studies reach the same conclusion as Tobias. you fail miserably
@Pentazoid111 Which new studies are you talking about? Can I have the names of the updated peer-reviewed papers? Tobias (1970) conclusion that earlier studies were wrong because they ignored factors like “sex, body size, age of death, childhood nutrition, origin of sample, occupation, and cause of death.” has been proven false by Kenneth Ho et al (1980) tinyurl*.*com/bsr4wjn
@DKshad0w There are plenty of scientists who study genetics and intelligence, and genetics and race who write good scientific research papers but all of the race realists cite is either jensen, rushton and lynn , but never any criticism of their papers. No why? Because race realist want to pursue their own political agenda, not engage in scientific inquiry.
@Pentazoid111 " all of the race realists cite is either jensen, rushton and lynn ," Jensen is an renown psychologistst, people not just Race Realist cite him on the matters of psychology and psychometrics. Research on racial differences especially behavioral difference are wildly unpopular, there isn't that many different researchers to choose from.
"but never any criticism of their papers. No why?" It's not the Race Realist's responsibility to bring up criticism.
@DKshad0w "he(Rushton) references himself a lot..." sofiarune also said this, and I have no idea wtf you and she's talking about. Did you read the abridged version of "Race, Evolution and Behavior"? Yes the abridged version cites... the actual book.
@Pentazoid111 Your University Library has a copy? I'm amazed. I read Rushton's book and his papers, I can't see how you can claim "he references himself a lot...". Now Rushton does do original research, so he does cite some of his own work.
@DKshad0w Why would you be amazed? Rushton's book certainly hasn't been one of the top 100 books banned from a library and there has been no systematic impetus to prevent him from publishing his book. Its not good to frequently cite yourself more than other sources
@Pentazoid111 If you can give a specific example, that could help. I just DON'T see it, his book is filled with various sources, his peer-reviewed papers are filled with various sources. This claim sound like a vacuous ad-hominem to me.
Canadian Customs seized and withheld copies of "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" for nine months while they tried to decide whether to condemn the book as "hate literature" and ban it from entering Canada. A rare occurrence considering that the last time that this had happened before then was in the 1980's.
@Pentazoid111 You are not allowed to exclude sources simply because they disagree with you or you don't like them for personal reasons. However, both authors you mention , if you would bother to look into things instead of just strip mining your own rectum, obtained their information from numerous studies done by others than themselves. So you make a fool of yourself by not even attacking the primary sources themselves. Be gone, thy miserable little sphincter boy.
The only reasons whites like Grafix or whatever his name is spout this bullshit is because he is sitting on top and has been brainwashed to force everyone up to his level. Even when I was the most indoctrinated I could tell our race formed more complex language and deeper thought. Just listen to a black person. Not the ones on TV that are the best of their race and can really compete with whites, go to the ghetto or listen to one on Youtube. We are not all equal everyone isn't as smart as us.
What's the point of hating other races? I harbor no hate for anyone based solely on their race. I want to help all races once we get ours straightened out and healthy again. I believe all races have something to bring to the table.I know I'm a member of the best race what's the point of hate? Why should I hateraces that are mentally below mine on average? People like this guy are stupid beyond belief.Blacks and Mexicans hate us and asians because they cannot accept that on average we are smarter
@LibertarianRealist No, but most afro-americans are as neanderthal as euro-americans are. Since not alot of them have 100% african ancestry. Nice try with the Neanderthal card in an attempt to justify racism against afro-americans.
Neanderthals < Africans. There are still Africans, lots of them. Where are the Neanderthals now? I guess they weren't fit enough. Moreover, their big melon heads couldn't hatch a scheme clever enough to prevent homo sapiens from exterminating them.
So a black child brought up in a white house hold, will still have the IQ of 70?
Shom909 2 weeks ago
Everyone accepts there is genetic difference retards. The point is that you racists assume that the differences makes us (whites) superiour to other races. Espesially because of out intelligence level. No, fuck that. There are plenty of black people that are way smarter then white people, and its like that for every "race".
gulbirk 3 weeks ago
Bottom line of this whole race iq stuff is that is the moral aspect that, weither genetic drift in colder climates tend to intelligent speciation or not, it still does not justify discrimination in multi-cultural societies/countries, at least I don't see how it does.
I mean Russia is a very large, white, unicultural, country, and they do not have an immigration problem, yet they are still racist to the handful of foreigners. White nationalists could just immigrate to Russia, problem solved.
iobroful 2 months ago
@iobroful thats the whole point, if you actually listen to the video, claiming that all people are innately equal justifies discrimination against more successful groups, and hereditarianism isnt the same as white nationalism
hobosmurf 2 months ago
@iobroful You are very wrong. Growing tension is caused by immigration from the Caucasus and the far east. Russians and ukranians only account for about 80% of the total population, the rest are muslims and far east asians. militant nationalism always has a source, and the source is usually immigration or other issues related to ethnicity or religion.
dringles 2 months ago
@dringles if moving from one place inside of a country to another city trying to find a job is considered immigration then.... you finish the sentence. Newsflash: Russian population is actually declining/aging. migration rate over past 5 years is below 0.1 %. You are really the worst kind (of racist): not even a little bit of factual accuracy, or creativity, or humor.
iobroful 2 months ago
@iobroful Why dont you look up the demographics yourself. Even left wing biased wikipedia states that Russians and ukranians make up about 82% of the population combined. I have never stated that the russian population is not declining, you are strawmanning.
The fact is that Russia has experienced a lot of immigration, legal and illegal, in the last 10 or so years. So where is your factual accuracy, or are you just a humourless racist?
dringles 2 months ago
@dringles you are a racist, not me.
iobroful 2 months ago
@iobroful Well it seems you ran out of arguments. Next thing is throwing the nazi card i suspect. :)
dringles 2 months ago
Also, I will interject ONE serious point. People talk about the Neanderthal equation but they do NOT talk about the Cro-Magnon equation. I firmly believe they play a role in the Genetics of Modern Human also.
WhiteWeasel420 2 months ago
Wow. If I looked like this sloppy Untermensch I wouldn't believe in anything positive about my race either LOLOLOL Tubby sloppy fat fuck XD
WhiteWeasel420 2 months ago
that fat guy looks like a failed abortion
CragHack86 2 months ago
Comment removed
CragHack86 2 months ago
I don't think they're saying europeans and east asians descend from Neanderthals.
I think they're saying these populations, at one point, interbred with Neanderthals.
fringeelements 2 months ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
@fringeelements Mainstream sources say Neanderthals conferred some important traits on humans (ex-Africans). That's a dangerous linkage to draw, because Neanderthals had large brains. Hybridization may have given us more intelligence. If so, Africans missed out on this beneficial genetic infusion. At the very least, Neanderthal DNA establishes a clear genetic line between Africans and non-Africans for purposes of racial classification based not on social construction.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 6
@LibertarianRealist what about the asian-white bell curve gap? Did asians have more fertile offspring with neanderthals? That would be interesting because according to Rushton caucasoids are sexually more active than are mongoloids. Moreover, the classic neanderthal range is from europe to iran, that is where they primarily were. Whites should have higher iq's than do asians if neanderthal interbreeding had significant effect on iq.
iobroful 2 months ago
@iobroful there was also selection for intelligence from the environment that people lived in, which probably explains how northeast asians are smarter than southeast asians and europeans are smarter than arabs and south asians
hobosmurf 2 months ago
@hobosmurf according to Rushton youtube.com/watch?v=YKAYodwVAcQ&feature=related @ 6:43 South east asians are 105 and higher than europe.
But anyway, it is environment and not Neanderthal influence, because Africans are smarter than australian natives (according to Rushton's map) and people migrated out of africa (as most of us agree).
iobroful 2 months ago
@iobroful oh yeah, is it this link? /watch?v=1QOtsSj1chg
the link doesnt work.
although australoids also have admixture from a type of humans called denisovans, whether thats significant or not we probably wont be allowed to know, just like with neanderthals
hobosmurf 2 months ago
@iobroful
IIRC, the Asian bell-curve is narrower than both Caucasoid and Negroid curves, so it would make sense for their being more intelligent on average to be a result of a genetic bottleneck wrt intelligence.
bombkangaroo 2 months ago
@bombkangaroo Actually there's no evidence for differently sized bell-curves among any of the races. It's important to note that East Asians shows a different pattern of intelligence, that is East Asians scores higher on visuo-spatial test but lower on verbal test compared to Whites.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w
Yes there is. That's what the available data on IQ tests tells us. If we plot it on a graph we see a wider distribution of IQ scores for Whites than Asians.
bombkangaroo 2 months ago
@bombkangaroo No there isn't, at least none that Steve Hsu or I can: tinyurl*.*com/7vfsy5p
I know LibertarianRealist and others have claimed there are or at least the possibility of differences in IQ variance, but there's just no evidence for it.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w
Yes there is. Ignoring actual psychometrics in favour of much more abstract measures that are influenced by an even greater number of variables does nothing to falsify the psychometric tests.
bombkangaroo 2 months ago
@bombkangaroo I'm not ignoring psychometics, the point is Steve Hsu did his own analysis and couldn't find any differences in variances only means. I'm just saying I have never seen any evidence for differences of SD for East Asian and Whites. If you can point to to some, that will be nice.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist for the best counter-argument to the out of africa theory read the excellent 2008 book 'Erectus Walks Amongst Us' by Richard D Fuerle which is free to read online. The book also details many interesting differences between the world's races. There are more people questioning the line about us evolving from chimps in Africa, with a link to orangutans in south east asia once again looking credible.
SmippeHyrst 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist about the big brains of neanderthals - bear in mind that the europeans who co-existed with neanderthals (the cro-magnons) had brains larger than both neanderthals and any of today's ethnic groups. The average European brain has been shrinking steadily since the ice age ended 10,000 years ago - probably because only the smartest could thrive in such harsh conditions, a selective pressure which has gone.
SmippeHyrst 2 months ago
This Bolshevik blimp, culture destroyer sounds like the Lucky Charms leprechaun, looks like General Burkhalter and has the petty Marxist anger of Keith Olbermann. Not a good combination.
mantle64 2 months ago 4
@mantle64 Hahaha...please, everyone, stop with the fat insults! Even though yours was good, there are fat and ugly people on our side, too, whose ideas should be judged on their own merits.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 6
At the end when he folds back and holds his head, it looks as if he is emotionally exhausted by it all. He may be genuinely angered at it all, but he gave no logical arguments, so it wasn't that, so it must be that he is actually exhausted with all the BS he just spouted. It hurt me just to listen to him.
Abreodan 2 months ago
@Abreodan LOL!!!!
mantle64 2 months ago
What a fat wimp!
SAEuropeanPatriot 2 months ago
@EuphoricImpact Bunk.
"It does not matter if there are differences in intelligence." It does not matter to you. Presumably because you don't have any.
"What matters is what would you do with this information IF it was proven."
The variance in abilities of differing ethnic and racial groups when it comes to performance in IQ tests has been proven to be beyond question. How closely one correlates this with the concept of "intelligence" remains somewhat subjective.
thespacialone 2 months ago
@EuphoricImpact Continuing...
"What matters is what would you do with this information"
No, what matters to YOU is what is done with this with this information, which is proven.
I can choose to ignore it, I can choose to attempt incorporate it in any number of proposals or arguments. What a race realist is unlikely to EVER do, however, is to employ it to the nefarious purposes which underpin your own cloistered bigotry.
LibReal has fatty pegged. Hook, line and fucking sinker.
thespacialone 2 months ago
@thespacialone lol
EuphoricImpact 2 months ago
@thespacialone I see LR removed my earlier comment. So, I will not respond here. I will place my reply within a future video. What a tool you are.
EuphoricImpact 2 months ago
@EuphoricImpact I do not remove comments, even if they are lies or personal attacks, though I reserve the right to do so in the future.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist Sure you don't.
EuphoricImpact 2 months ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 months ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 2 months ago
Fucking excellent video. Tubs is not a well man
thespacialone 2 months ago
I don't see any point for people, such as the guy to whom you responded, to make videos of that nature. It's not like they're going to make us exceptionally angry or change our minds by calling us stupid or racist or psychoanalyzing us (something that Hannibal did already). Perhaps it's just jerk-off material for egalitarians.
BloodiCheeseCake 2 months ago
I'm not really a white supremacist. I think that the white race is the best race, FOR ME. But I think a black person could probably make a good case for why the black race is the best race FOR HIM. I'd like egalitarians to acknowledge this distinction, I suppose you might call it "white preferentialism" rather than "white supremacism". Seriously though, if you value the things we value (knowledge, progression, civilisation), how could you NOT think the white race is the best?
CitizenOccidens 2 months ago 2
@CitizenOccidens Very nicely said.
Does the polar bear or the bald-headed Eagle worry about the "supremacy" of European man? Only when European man impinges on his environment. And so only when peoples are afforded a real sense of an ability to self-determine will this nonsense end.
Nature made races different. He who refuses to acknowledge the will of nature deserves no place within it.
thespacialone 2 months ago
One thing that always amuses me is that the kind of people who most loudly sing the praises of racial diversity just happen to be the very same people who splutter with indignation at any suggestion of racial differences. The irony inherent in their position completely eludes them.
atticana 2 months ago 4
what I really hate are all those chins..
kubaniski 2 months ago
He reminds me kinda of the cenobite Butterball from Hellraiser.
AkiraHades 2 months ago
Great work as usual. These so called 'anti-racists' need psychological help... I almost feel bad for them.
BootboyJohnny 2 months ago
At the top, right behind Ashkenazim Jews and Asians.
45means45 2 months ago
This guy is fat as well. Why are most antiracists so fat?
darklord220 2 months ago 23
@darklord220 Yes. The disgustingly fat youtubers should stick to using still images of pictures instead of always showing their face.
45means45 2 months ago
@45means45 LOL, was that an allusion to eagleeye1975 by any chance? Not that I despise the guy — in fact, quite the contrary.
But I have disagreements with him on race (and the fact that he's a statist, albeit minarchist).
Tsicar 2 months ago
@Tsicar No. I was taking specifically about Hannibal.
45means45 2 months ago
@darklord220 Free blankets!!!
army2k08 2 months ago
@army2k08 I've actually been robbed by black people.
darklord220 2 months ago
@darklord220 Did you crawl up into the fetal position and cry uncontrollably?
army2k08 2 months ago
@army2k08 No, I shot a single leg on him, mounted him, and waited until the police came.
darklord220 2 months ago
@darklord220 And very , very ugly, and even more creepy.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
@darklord220 their flabby bodies match their flabby minds
mantle64 2 months ago
@darklord220 High body fat makes you more feminine and submissive.
fringeelements 2 months ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
@darklord220 if you castrate a cat, he would get obese and slow.
The same with the dogs and other castrated animals (including humanoid males).
"Anti-Racism" is Social/Psychological castration... it has the same effects of physical castration: passivity, irrationality and obesity
DanishGreatDane 2 months ago
@darklord220 They just want sum of dat black cock. lol
SPQRImperator 2 months ago
I like your methodology in this video.
MISTERWONKA7 2 months ago
Well said I completely agree with everything I have heard you say this far well done!
ConservativeAtheist 2 months ago
@ConservativeAtheist Thanks!
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago
I'm glad someone said it. Shit is ridiculous. "everyone who disagrees with me does so because or their pathology."
hozehd 2 months ago
Native americans from north america have similar genetic markers to north eastern asians than any other ethnic population and yet their IQ as a group is more similar to that of african americans than it is to people of asian descent. As far as africans supposedly being more aggressive than whites and asians because of genetics, provide a source that confirms this claim that isn't by Rushton or Lynn.
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 "provide a source that confirms this claim that isn't by Rushton or Lynn." Even if we did, what's to stop you from just calling those researchers "racist"?
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w You have me confuse for someone else. I care about facts, I am not swayed by political ideology when it comes to science , unlike many of the so called race realists on youtube , who make assertions that are not backed by science. The majority of the race realist proponents are affiliated with a political ideology, usually ethnic nationalism, most race realists aren't scientists. You won't see scientists advocate race realism like they advocate the theory of natural selection
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 If you care about facts, then it shouldn't matter where the facts come from. And no, claiming that Ruston, Lynn or anyone else that by having a political ideology their sources can't be trusted is a genetic fallacy. It's also an ad-hominem fallacy.
DKshad0w 2 months ago 2
@DK I read Rushton's papers and I read Race , eVolution and behavior and for both his papers and the book , he references himself a lot and he references old and now outdated sources. Many of the references he uses are not scientific and his methodology where he asked black , whites and asian students about their personal sex life was also flawed. it does matter if you are President of an organization, where past presidents of that org. advocated that all blacks be shipped to africa
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 This is what I see when people criticizes Rushton's work. They attack the more objectionable parts while ignoring the totality of the evidence. Rushton also cited sources showing differences in: two-egg twinning, maturation rates, head size, number of cortical neurons. Critics conveniently ignore those. Rushton do use old sources, but he does so to show a pattern, he does use newer sources to vindicate old data. Like the correlation between headsize and IQ with MRI data.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w Rushton uses data of the average brain sizes between blacks and whites that confirms his hypothesis, but selectively ignores the other data on brain size. There is data on brain size differences by jerlson that shows africans have a larger brain than whites did in their sample . Most modern studies on brain size and race find little to no noticeable differences between blacks and whites as well as asians. Read papers by tobias, D Cain and lieberman
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 Can you give me the name of those papers by Tobias, D Cain and Lieberman. You know the charge of cherry picking can go both ways right?
Here's a paper by J. Philippe Rushton and Elizabeth W. Rushton summarizing racial IQ and brain differences and also address some of the critisism from Lieberman, Graves, ect. tinyurl*.*com/889977x
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 Here, shut up, sit down' listen, don't respond, I don't care what you think, I've already heard it 100x on LR's comment sections anyway, just go to your library and try getting an ILL on "Race" by John Baker and "External Morphology of the Primate Brain" by Cornelius Connolly.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance That paper is over 60 years old . Look at the paper from Tobias where he surveys all of the measurement of the brain size of different races from past studies and present studies and he comes to the conclusions that the MAJORITY of measurment samples on the brain size of the individuals show no noticeable differences or no differences at all. Updated studies reach the same conclusion as Tobias. you fail miserably
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 Which new studies are you talking about? Can I have the names of the updated peer-reviewed papers? Tobias (1970) conclusion that earlier studies were wrong because they ignored factors like “sex, body size, age of death, childhood nutrition, origin of sample, occupation, and cause of death.” has been proven false by Kenneth Ho et al (1980) tinyurl*.*com/bsr4wjn
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w There are plenty of scientists who study genetics and intelligence, and genetics and race who write good scientific research papers but all of the race realists cite is either jensen, rushton and lynn , but never any criticism of their papers. No why? Because race realist want to pursue their own political agenda, not engage in scientific inquiry.
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 " all of the race realists cite is either jensen, rushton and lynn ," Jensen is an renown psychologistst, people not just Race Realist cite him on the matters of psychology and psychometrics. Research on racial differences especially behavioral difference are wildly unpopular, there isn't that many different researchers to choose from.
"but never any criticism of their papers. No why?" It's not the Race Realist's responsibility to bring up criticism.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w "he(Rushton) references himself a lot..." sofiarune also said this, and I have no idea wtf you and she's talking about. Did you read the abridged version of "Race, Evolution and Behavior"? Yes the abridged version cites... the actual book.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w Yes , I read the book . checked it out from my university library. Its garbage
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 Your University Library has a copy? I'm amazed. I read Rushton's book and his papers, I can't see how you can claim "he references himself a lot...". Now Rushton does do original research, so he does cite some of his own work.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w Why would you be amazed? Rushton's book certainly hasn't been one of the top 100 books banned from a library and there has been no systematic impetus to prevent him from publishing his book. Its not good to frequently cite yourself more than other sources
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 I don't see Rushton frequently citing himself, just saying.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@DKshad0w Then you are not looking hard enough
Pentazoid111 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 If you can give a specific example, that could help. I just DON'T see it, his book is filled with various sources, his peer-reviewed papers are filled with various sources. This claim sound like a vacuous ad-hominem to me.
DKshad0w 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111
Canadian Customs seized and withheld copies of "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" for nine months while they tried to decide whether to condemn the book as "hate literature" and ban it from entering Canada. A rare occurrence considering that the last time that this had happened before then was in the 1980's.
PseudoAdministrator 2 months ago
@Pentazoid111 You are not allowed to exclude sources simply because they disagree with you or you don't like them for personal reasons. However, both authors you mention , if you would bother to look into things instead of just strip mining your own rectum, obtained their information from numerous studies done by others than themselves. So you make a fool of yourself by not even attacking the primary sources themselves. Be gone, thy miserable little sphincter boy.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@14:43 As you could have, yet you chose to talk about race...
14ByTheSword 2 months ago
LOL, 'some kind of eve' — a pathetic sack of shit indeed.
Tsicar 2 months ago 2
The only reasons whites like Grafix or whatever his name is spout this bullshit is because he is sitting on top and has been brainwashed to force everyone up to his level. Even when I was the most indoctrinated I could tell our race formed more complex language and deeper thought. Just listen to a black person. Not the ones on TV that are the best of their race and can really compete with whites, go to the ghetto or listen to one on Youtube. We are not all equal everyone isn't as smart as us.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
What's the point of hating other races? I harbor no hate for anyone based solely on their race. I want to help all races once we get ours straightened out and healthy again. I believe all races have something to bring to the table.I know I'm a member of the best race what's the point of hate? Why should I hateraces that are mentally below mine on average? People like this guy are stupid beyond belief.Blacks and Mexicans hate us and asians because they cannot accept that on average we are smarter
Luigi84289 2 months ago
Was "Eve" a neanderthal?
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 13
@LibertarianRealist maybe
1000g2g3g4g800999 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist neanderthal is a social construct. Step out of your pathology.
hozehd 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist No, but most afro-americans are as neanderthal as euro-americans are. Since not alot of them have 100% african ancestry. Nice try with the Neanderthal card in an attempt to justify racism against afro-americans.
iobroful 2 months ago
Neanderthals < Africans. There are still Africans, lots of them. Where are the Neanderthals now? I guess they weren't fit enough. Moreover, their big melon heads couldn't hatch a scheme clever enough to prevent homo sapiens from exterminating them.
iobroful 2 months ago