Added: 3 years ago
From: rajshri
Views: 192,936
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (105)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks for the videos

  • I love the way Bhishma looks in front of the setting sun. It illuminates him so well while he is talking to his mother.

  • imagine every hastinapur citizen protesting..."EKTA KAPOOR, HAI HAI"

  • THE ONLY CRAPPY THING ABOUT THIS WHOLE SERIES ARE THE SETS DAYUM  WAT KINDA SETS ARE THESE ITS ONLY THANKS TO THE CHARACHTERS DAT THIS SERIAL GOT WHER IT IS OTHERWISE THE SETS WERE ABOLOUTE JUNK..

  • @REXXBAILEY hey, this was back then! they didn't have such awesome or modern technology to get better sets, and besides i love these sets, they look awesome despite being old (look at the new ramayan......i hate it!)

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan OHH PLZZ DO U EVEN AVE ANY IDEA WAT U TALKING ABOUT .. DIS SERIAL WAS COMMISSIONED BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT ITSELF FOR THE PPL OF INDIA IT WAS THE BIGGEST PROJECT FOR TV AT DAT TIME EVERYONE INVOLVED KNEW JUS HOW BIG DIS SERIAL WAS GONNA BE .. AND THEY STARTED FILMING IT IN ONLY 1986 .. EVEN THEY THEY VERY MUCH HAD THE CAPACITY TO MAKE BETTER SETS THEN THEY DID HAD THEY NOT USED DAT SHAKUNI AS A SET DESIGNER AS WELL TO SAVE SOME MONEY ..

  • @REXXBAILEY oh yes i know very well what i'm talking about the next serial a few years after, om namah shivay, didn't have any better sets, and the effects were once again GOD AWFUL, besides these sets aren't bad looking at all, do they look worse than the sets on the old ramayan? this was in the same decade/era, they weren't intent on bringing fancyy shiny BLING onto every set (like the new ramayan)

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan AINT EVEN GONNA TALK ABOUT THE SETS OF OLD RAMAYAN. BUT FOR A PRODUCTION HOUSE LIKE BR FILMS THEYVERY MUCH CUD AVE DONE BETTER THEN HIRING SHAKUNI TO DO THE SETS.. THER WERE A HUNDRED TIMES BETTER SET DESIGNERS THEN DAT GUY FOR DOING SETS FOR A SERIAL OF SUCH CALIBRE..  HATE SEEING SO MUCH OF PLASTER OF PARIS EVRYWHERE SO GODDAMN TACKY AND ILLITERATE DAT LOOKS.

  • @REXXBAILEY ugh yea but at least they're not using fake wallpaper inside a big studio and then pretend it's a hut/forest.............but if you look at later b.r.c. works they had much better sets....but i still think it looks so much better than the newest sets on the newest serials.....these ones have 'charm' compared to the new awful ones :)

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan WELL I M TALKING MORE IN TERMS OF CRITICAL EXXELLENCE THEN JUS OLD WORLD CHARM THOUGH.. ACTUALLY AMONG THE NEW SERIALS LIKE THE RAMAYAN THE SETS WERE THE ONLY GOOD THING IN DAT SERIAL LOLS. THE SET GUYS SEEM TO AVE DONE ATLEAST SOME RESEARCH WHILE BUILDING THOSE SETS AS OPPOSED TO JUS USING POTS AND VICTORIAN ERA DESIGNS IN THE NAME OF TRADITIONAL HINDU ART MOTIFS THE WAY IT WAS IN MAHABHARAT ..

  • @REXXBAILEY goodness do you HAVE to WRITE IN CAPS ALL THE TIME??? I GET IT!!! oh well, the new ramayan's fancy shiny bling drove me nuts, the mahabharat is not that shiny, but more like a chalky shinyness whic i love so much better :)

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan WELL YEAH I UNDERSTAND UR POINT THERE .. AND THE REASON FOR U TO FEEL DAT CHALKY SHINY NESS IN THESE OLD EPICS IS BECUASE THEY AVE DONE THOROUGH RESEARCH ON THE SUBJECT TRYING THEIR BEST DO JUSTICE TO THE STORY FOR WHICH THEY USED THE MOST PERFECT ACTORS TO GIVE A FEELING OF HOW THE REAL ONES MIGHT AVE BEEN IN REALITY BACK THEN.. CAPTURING THEIR TRUE AURA DATS WHY AND YES I WRITE IN CAPITALS.. AKASHVAANI HAMESHA 'CAPITALS' MAIN HEE HOTI HAI !!!!!!!! :D

  • @REXXBAILEY yea the 'chalky shiny-ness' makes it look like it is actually ancient india, not 20th century gold furniture........ looked quite........well idk....... it just looked to modern and new for me. hahaha ;)

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan ALL DAT COMES ONLY BECUASE OF PPL WHO DONT HAVE THEIR HEARTS AND MIND IN THE RIGHT PLACE TO MAKE ASERIAL LIKE DAT.. AND IN ANY CASE THEY USED TO AVE ALL DAT GOLD IN EVRYTHING DUDE.. DAT WAS WAT INDIA HAS ALWAYS BEEN KNOWN FOR . ALL THE GOLD AND  JEWELS ERVYWHERE THE EYE CAN SEE..

  • @REXXBAILEY ah yes! very true, why else would all the foreigners go gaga over india hahahaha yep true very true............

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan YUP.. AND WAT MADE THEM GO EVEN MORE CRAZY WAS BECUASE .. THE KINGS WERE NOT ONLY GIVING AWAY PLATE FULL OFF JEWELS TO ANYONE WHO WUD STAND IN FRONT OF THEM BUT MORE BECUASE OF THE FACT DAT THEY SAW THE KINGS WERE GIVING AWAY THE KINDA JEWELS OTHERS WUD AVE KEPT UNDR LOCK AND KEY AND REGARDED AS THEIR KINGDOMS MOST PRECIOUS BELONGINGS AS OPPOSED TO SOMETHING MEDIOCRE ENOUGH TO BE GIVEN AWAY. LOLS

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan AND DATS WAT GOT THEM THINKIN DAT IF THESE GUYS ARE GIVING AWAY STUFF LIKE DAT THEN IMAGINE HOW THE STUFF THEY WUDNT GIVE AWAY BE LIKE.. WELL DATS WEN INDIA KE WEALTH KO IN PAAPIYON KI NAZAR LAG GAYEE.. LOLS.. THEN THEY DIDNT JUS STOP AT THE KINGS TREASURE BUT ALSO WENT ON TO TAKE MOST OF THE IDOLS IN THE TEMPLE AS WELL SINCE THEY ALSO MOST OF WUD BE MADE OF GOLD AND PRECIOUS STONES .. ALL IN ALL FUCKED UP THE COUNTRY LIKE NO OTHER LOLS.

  • @REXXBAILEY yep generosity became a backfire

  • ONLY THE GUY WITH SUPERHUMAN OR DEMONS STRENGTH COULD KILL JARASANDHA COZ HE HIMSELF WAS JOINT BY A RAAKSHASI CALLED JARA TATS Y KRISHNA HADNT KILLED HIM JUST FOR THE SAKE OF AAKAASHVANI HE IS GOD HE CAN DO ANYTHING

  • THE MAHABHARAT ALSO SHOWS THE DECLINE OF THE SO CALLED "RAKSHAS" JAAT .. DURING THE RAMAYAN PERIOD THEY USED TO AVE THEIR OWN KINGDOMS OFTEN MORE POWERFUL AND SIGNIFICANT THEN THE ARYAN ONES..AND WERE IN CONSTANT WAR WID THEM. AND BY THE TIME OF THE MAHABHARAT THEY WERE REDUCED TO LIVING IN THE FOREST WID JUST ANIMAL SKINS TO COVER THEMSELVES AND EATING HUMAN AND ANIMAL FLESH PROBABLY RAW. GETTING HATE EVEN MORE FOR DAT DATS A REALLY TRAGIC WAY OF THINGS TO GO FOR THESE PPL.

  • @REXXBAILEY ya know i was just rewatching ramayan and i realized ram may have actually vanquished the asur jaat, because there were very few mentioned in the mahabharat period!

  • @ADMJCXNK97fan WELL MANY PPL DO SAY DAT THE RAM RAVAN WAR IS BASICALLY A STORY OF THE ARYAN CIVILIZATION TAKING OVER THE CONTINENT FROM THE EARLIER DRAVIDIANS ANYWAYS.. AND RAM IS SAID TO AVE RULED FOR 13,000 YERS BEFORE HE WENT BACK SO.. NOT MUCH CAN BE DONE IF A SINGLE AGENDA WERE TO BE ENFORCED FOR 13,000 YERS NOW IS IT..LOLS GOOD ENOUGH TIME TO DESTROY A CIVILISATION AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED

  • in this episode i notice 1 thign-

    the guy who is here acting as Sudhama is the same who acted as Shikhandi in this Mahabharat

  • y???why did krishna change his capital???y...dis isn't cleary intepreted in this episode....'ll have to chk some texts !!!

    dis really isn't d real or i vd say a clear implication....if krishna is also d main 'hero' in mahabharat...he vd have defended his own capital.....dis shows he was human with limitations !!!

  • @taurasicon1 well he's not that keen on wars either :)

  • all artist done the awsome justice to their respective characters no one else in this world can repeat the creation like wat b.r chopra did...........hats off

  • History of India presented elegantly. B.R. Chopra's Mahabharat is a CLASS apart ! God bless him and his crew. The whole nation owes a ton to the creator's of this serial

  • what's this about Ekta Kapoor? Who is she?

  • this king is more concern about his rights on the kingdom, he damn care about the kingdom itself.

  • purshuram says:

    "makhan bohot khaliya, murli bohot bajali,leelayeh bohot karli Vasudev...ab woh karya karo jiske liye prithvi par ayeh ho"

    wah guruji.....kya kaha hai.....touched the soul...enlightened the meaning and concept behind krishna janma in this world.....wow!

  • ithink all you guys have to stop that hindu muslim sikh crap. it's time to get over all that rubbish.

  • Dear Blessed Souls, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!

  • aath shree mahabharat kathaa

    kathaa hai purushartha ki ye swarth ki paramarth ki

    sarathi jiske bane shree krishna bharat paarth ki

    shabd dighoshit hua jab satya saarthak sarvtha

    i love it....

  • Love the way the soldiers stand in line just to killed by arrows..like.."Kill us we r pathetic Morons"..bahahaha

  • 28:05 the background is repeated and at 28:07 on the right hand side. its the mirror.

  • hiiiiiiiiiii fr

  • Bhishm Pitamah is the greated Pitamah in the entire world history !!!

    And Mukesh Khanna at par with Amitabh Bachhan..one of the best we have today...

  • I love these series..

    *THumbs up*

  • wow ..jeet ...har gaya .....lol ;)

  • guys wat i am thinking is that u are just fighting like pandav and kaurav.

    by the way i am very much impressed by jambuka1

    good 1 man

  • Comment removed

  • kar di na sardaro vali baat !..:).. being an Indian, i respect sardars, i agree they are known for their bravery, but dont forget they are not the only brave.. what sikh regiment in Indian army could not do, rajputana and gurkha regiment have done, the marathas are no less than sardars.. and they all are hindus.. besides, warfare is not all needed to succeed as a society,.. imagine ur nation without hindus, only surds and think where u wud be.. ..no money, no skill, just arrogance

  • yea.. just arrogance, and few shouts and shrieks.. if you do ur role good in society, there is no need to show others less... besides.. you talk as if u were the sardar who did all that.. each one is known by his deeds and merits.. so dont get arrogant and boast about ur community.. thats a sign of an individuals weakness... aur ek baat, agar him hindu nai hote na.. agar tumara khalistan hota.. bhukhe nange mar rahe hote ab..

  • Comment removed

  • tum rajputo, gurkha, maratha in sab hinduo ko nahi jante kya?.. ye jane hi jate hain apni bahaduri ke liye.. agar haar jeet ki hi baat hoti hain.. to fir indira gandhi ki death ke baad kitne sardar mare gaye... kyo nahi bacha paye vo apne aap ko.. agar tum sardar apne aap main hi jitne ko itne saksham ho... sardaro ne hamari madad ki hain.. hum mante hain. lekin iska matlab ye nahi ke hum tum se kahi bhi kum hain... kisi rajput ke sath bhid ke dekhio.. pata chal jayega..

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • :)).. u made my day.. ive never laughed so much at sum evening.. kaar di na sardaro vaali baat.. tum sardaro main bacho ka bheja hota hain.. ya phir bacho ka bhi nai.. bheja hi nai hota hain... :).. acha thik hain.. kaha milney ke liye aye ye puch raha tha na tu.. thik hain beta.. san diego, california, usa... yaha par main hun.. aja ..and u need to improve your english.. no OUT WAY?.. ye kya hota hain be anpadh gavar... sardar ka girebaab.. sardar ke girebaan main hindu hath dalte hi nai..

  • kyon ki vaha badboo ke alava kuch nai hota.. :)  .... aur kya bakri ki kasam tum kha bhi kaise sakte ho.. tum to khud bakri ko khate ho.. yahi hain tumhare sanskar.. ghode gadhe, kutto, bakri, suvar.. kekde.. sabko pakadkar khate ho.. aj ke yug ke jungli ho tum log... aur ye dhamki kisi aur ko diyo.. kaha tha na ke rajput se bhid ke dekhio.. yaha par bade dinge nai marta main teri tara. lekin bete hath laga na tu agar.. to tere sare vichar badal jayenge.. :)

  • Comment removed

  • @jeet027 -

    If u only knew that Sikhs were descendants of Saini-Yadu clan & Lohana-Raghuvanshi clan.Fool U r only insulting ur own roots.Buddhism,Jainism Sikhism all r branched out from Hinduism.Check wikipedia for details on saini & Lohana.Guru Govind singh is listed as a Lohana

  • Comment removed

  • a gaya na apni aukat pe.. ye sab bakwaas likhna koi badi baat nahi.. 2 saal ka bacha bhi yaha par tere jaise ghatiya chise likh sakta hain.. ha par uski english zarur tujse achi hogi.. ye sab likh kar tune sardaro ka hi naam kharab kiya hain... gali galoch aur aurto ke baare main gandi chize kayar aur kamzoor likhte hain.. tu sardaro ke naam par dhabba hain.. kamzoor hain.. tu to jagde ke layak bhi nahi.. :).. ja bhag ja.. ! .. :)

  • Comment removed

  • @jambuka1 vah vah gr8 reply to jit.

  • Comment removed

  • is jagde ka koi ant hi nahi.. aur yaha par gali galoch karna hi ek kamzori hain... in time you will realize, and i wish i wud be the one who makes you realize.

  • Comment removed

  • @jambuka1 -

    D punjabi muslims of Pakistan r all basically Sikhs forced 2 convert 2 Islam.

  • @jambuka1 -

    Agar padha likha hota toh aisa crap thodi naa likhta jeet.Iss murkh se aur kya apeksha karr saktey hain.Fool does not even know Sikhism buddhism jainism all trace their origins from hinduism.hum hi nahi hotey toh inn k hone ka toh prashna hi nahi tha.All d religious icons r to b respected but isski baatoon se lagta hain yeh Sikh guruoon se nahi Bin Laden aur Mullah Omar se inspired hain.Unnhi se ghatiya bhasha ka prayog karna seekha hain iss ne

  • aur ek baat sun le.. jab Indira Gandhi ki death ke baad ke dango main jab tumko kutto ki tarah mar dalte the na.. tab hinduo ne kai sikho ko bachaya tha.... delhi ki Trilokpuri aur kai jagaho par, hinduo ne sikho ko ghar main asra dekar bachaya tha.. tab tumhari gand mar rahe the hindu aur bacha bhi rahe the hindu... tu akal to zor de aur samaj.. i hate to use such language dude.. par tu un logo main se nai jo pyaar se samje.. tuje teri hi bhasha main samjaya ja sakta hain...

  • @jeet027 -

    Hahahaha i pity u poor soul.U din learn anything from ur gurus n their teachings.Prabhu tumhey sadbuddhi de

  • Comment removed

  • dude.. kehne ko to har koi ke paas bahut si batein hoti hain jo dil main chubh sakti hain.. agar sardar bravery ke liye jane jate hain.. to aur kis baat ke liye jane jate hain.. ye bhi tum jaante ho.. is liye main bolunga nahi. :).. aisa nai ke main manta hun ke vo sach hain.. but moral is think. before u type anything.. without any reason.. u shud not hurt emotions of people.. main bhi sikh dharam ke bare main bahut kuch likh sakhta hun.... but i dont wana hurt people.. i respect their religion

  • hindustan ke prime minister ek sikh hain... ye tum bhul gaye kya.. we should respect each other.. and be united as Indians.. itihaas khod khod kar kuch bhi likh dena thik nahi.. even i can do that.. aur fir iska koi ant hi nahi.. live in present.. and respect people to be respected

  • @jambuka1 yahi to afsos ki baat hai, kuchh sikh baat samjtey hi nahin hain...unhen sikh PM bhi diya, par usne kya kiya? Apne Guru Ji ki di hui seekh bhool kar apni bhoomi aur uskey logon ko firagiyon ke haath bech diya? Apni pagdi goron ke paon taley rond di?

  • @jambuka1 -

    Dude he proves that he lacks brains by talking rubbish about others. he is only disgracing himself and making a laughing stock of himself.

  • Comment removed

  • :).. tere jaise log sirf aisi gandi batein hi kar sakte hain.. andar to dum hota nahi.. galiya dekar aur aurto ke baare main kuch bhi likh kar tu apne aap ko hi bharosa dilana chahta hain ki tu jeeta hain.. :).. thats a sign of weakness.. u dont have any self esteem.. dum hain to apni baat se lad... teri batein hi 2 saal ke bache jaisi hain.. tujse vaad vivad hi kya karna.. jhopdi main rehne valo se badtar tere sanskar hain.. aur bacho jaisi baatein.. tujse to ladna bhi bekar hain :)

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @ABHISHEKMHT4 Kaun tu ya phir yeh Gandu Raja

  • Comment removed

  • @ABHISHEKMHT4 Oh teri ma ki Chut Saley Ckley wali Randi Ki Gandu Hindu Cow piss drinker Nasal.Matterchod Apni Mami ko Julab ki Goli laa kar khila aur Phir dekhna Kitney Rang Virange Laudey Nikleygey uss key Bosdey sey jo uss ney ab "taQ" khaye hain Yunkey tu yeh Soch un sab ki Stemp teyrey par lagee huyee hai tho tu kayaa huaaa ??? Ek Mix vegetable ki tra Mix Hrami "Bastard"

  • Comment removed

  • @jeet027 sale marne kop to teri gannd maar lo par main tere jaisa neech pig nahin hoon...

  • @ABHISHEKMHT4 teri Maa ko Kujlee waley Kutey sey Chudwaoun Tankey Din Ratt Apni Chut Kujlati rahey,Saley Maaterchot Thigney Jaa DNA Karwaa saley Suar Tumari Aurtey 1000 Sall takk Muslman piggy race Chod kaar karr tum jaisey ko Chodd gayee,Sharam ki Baat hai key tum Apni Aurton ki Bhi Raksha nahi kar sakey.Saley Namard Gandu Cow piss drinker.

  • this jeet027 is the biggest idiot ive ever seen. im glad you are teaching him a lesson.

  • @str8desi -

    He does not know that All his gurus were Hindus actually.They established their own philosophy just like Bhagwaan Buddha.Problem is this dick measuring & arrogance is the prime reason of downfall of many great warriors.Duryodhan,Karna,Raava­n.History is full of it.yet this fool has not learnt anything yet.The gurus also teach about tolerance respect & humility.But he picked up nothing from it

  • @jambuka1 Hello, I see that you are very passionate about Mahabharat & your identity. Let me share with you something. Even if we take out the "Hindu religion" factor from Mahabharat, & study it as a case study in social sciences, politics, diplomacy, governance, administration, science & technology, economics, whatever, we will find that nothing has changed even today...only outward appearances have changed...think about it, you will understand what I'm saying.

  • Comment removed

  • Ranchor! :) Whether it be Krishna's parents or King or guru or any one...only that thing happens what Krishna decides!...such a rebel!

     Krishna and Balaram combination in this series is so nice to watch.

  • AWESOME!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Krishna is my favorite part of Mahabharat. He makes everything so interesting to watch and to learn.

  • Vidhur said that a son only has rights to the property which belongs to his Father and Hastinapur does not belong to Dhritrashtra... If someone is to be appointed Yuvraaj not based on his ability but based on inheritance then also Yudhishtar should be appointed Yuvraaj as Pandu was the real king and Dhritrastra is merely his representative in his absence...Based on ability, Yudhishtar wins hands down over Duryodhan..So in both the cases he is the correct choice...YAHI DHARMA HAI... :-)

  • A very significant question was answered at 42.15 minute...can anyone explain wat exacly it means...

  • Comment removed

  • Vidur: "Aap to pratinidhi ke bhi pratinidhi hain"

    Explanation: Dhritrashtra is -

    (a) representing Pandu on the throne. Pandu left kingdom on a self-imposed exile after he killed a sage by mistake and Dhritrashtra was asked to take his place.

    (b) Pandu is representing son of Vichitravirya. Vichitravirya died before leaving any children. So Sage Vyasa fathered Vichitra's wives and Pandu and Dhritrashtra were born.

  • yaar mahabharat kab hui thi , i mean how many years before

  • scholars who agree that mahabharat was a factual happening and not just a work of fiction date it back to 3000 BCE. This is based on astronomical, geographical, literary and archeological finds.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • LOL at Vasudeva's suggestion 16:00!

  • the great video of all time baby!

  • i am mad about mahabharat epic as its so nicely made spl. the dialogues r amazing!! its so much to learn frm every episode...

  • I have no words to express my feelings

  • awesome... ishud say.... they must stop the ekta kapoors MAHABHARAT... ITS A DISGRACE AND NOT AT ALL DIGNIFIED....

  • @giricharya I agree with you. I have not watched all of Ekta kapoor's serial, but there were a few things in that which I found very interesting. These were not mentioned in B.R. Chopra's Mahabharat. But then, This epic is so vast in its expanse & depth, time frame invilved, it is not possible for any one person to depict it. I believe even if it goes on for 40 years, like some of the American soap operas, we will not be able to get it in its entirety.

  • fantastic dialogues on polity, governance and of rule and reign

  • very good

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more