GEAR: If it were a President Bush or McCain intervening in Libya or Yemen, there would be hell to pay. Yes, they would go bonkers. I agree with Ron Paul's view on our foreign policy and how we need to do less, not more. That's why I'm going to the caucus next year and voting for him. I know he won't vomit out a bunch of BS just to get into office, as Obama did.
GEAR: The hypocrisy is staggering isn't it? Since this video was uploaded, Obama has reversed his foreign policy even further from his campaign. Obama the Senator just might impeach Obama the President. I wonder if Congress will ever actually have an up-and-down vote on our campaigns in Libya & Yemen? It seems Obama has no interest in even asking them.
LMFAO. I am laughing so hard i have to watch this again. You are so right about mccainisthrough. He does copy and paste and still makes errors big time.
SUSHI: ok, thanks for your answer on peanut oil, it's probably not an economic winner either. Your initial statement on it made it sound as if there was some giant conspiracy against it, despite the fact that it's always been legal. I'd like to see someone drive on hemp ethanol a few thousand miles and see what his gas mileage is and if it is corrosive as say, corn-based ethanol.
SUSHI: Ok, you mentioned peanut oil initially, but it's not illegal and has somehow, if not magically, failed to become the renewable energy source we need. No conspiracy theory backdrop on this item?
SUSHI: Ok, I just wanted to get you on record with allowing Saddam to invade Kuwait & Saudi Arabai and take them over by force. What about peanut oil? I asked you about that some time ago and you started yammering about pot again.
SUSHI: I still want an answer to this question and you will answer it in your next post. I'm the host, you're the guest, that's the way it goes. Would you have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait and then possibly the oil fields in Saudi Arabia back in 1991 under G.H.W. Bush.
@SushiHead20 Can't really blame you for wanting to do that, to be honest. This affects us all. I'm just tired of the blame game and the very real problems it's not solving. Obastard isn't even letting people band together to clean up (so don't light the match until HE is thrown in, too!)
@SushiHead20 You might find this surprising, given that I assisted kookdetector in making this video, but I'm ALSO for the legalization of hemp. (what our glorious Constitution was written upon) Now, whatever applications it can be used in combustion aside, I still don't fault ALL oil drilling for what BP did. They were lazy, cheap, and they screwed up, and they deserve what's coming to them. But recriminations won't solve anything, just like our administration hasn't. I'd like to hear ideas.
LARRY: Good points my friend. Sushi just lets his emotions get control of him and throws the baby out with the bathwater a lot. I don't think I'm going to get an answer from him on my question.
SUSHI: Whatever happened to peanut oil? It's not illegal. I would wager it wasn't an economic winner, ergo, it was shelved. Your point about these renewable fuels is noted, but still doesn't answer my question: Would you have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait (and then possibly Saudi Arabia) and thus have control over a lot of oil? Would you have ignored those events? I hate to beat a dead horse, but G.H.W. Bush's actions were REACTIVE. Answer that in your next post please.
SUSHI: I think drugs should be legal, but I seriously doubt your story concerning engines running on hemp and peanut oil. It's probably as likely a "success story" as ethanol and these other "pie-in-the-sky" renewable energy fads. Oil is used for a lot of things other than transportation. You should ratchet down your rhetoric, you sound like an idiot and someone might report you. I won't report that comment, but someone else might. Long story short, it was good to run Saddam out of Kuwait.
SUSHI: Thanks for the irrelevant info. I'm sure if peanut oil was an economic boon, some rich angel investor would've snagged it by now. So, you would've let Saddam take Kuwait and Saudi Arabia if it played out that way? And don't forget, G.H.W. Bush's actions were reactive to Saddam's actions.
SUSHI: Considering you (and probably Rothbard too, I would wager you repeat him verbatim) didn't know what a "palestinian" was and was utterly confused concerning two-state solution policy under Bush and Obama, we'll take that with a grain of salt. So you would let Saddam take over the oil fields of Kuwait & Saudi Arabia and thus be able to maniuplate a geopolitical spike in oil prices? G.H.W. Bush's actions during his term were REACTIVE, not proactive.
SUSHI: Remember the last video of mine you commented on? Keep that in mind. I was told you were over here and I don't remember mentioning Israel in this vid, so keep your comments limited to the video. What would you have done when G.H.W Bush was in office and Saddam invaded Kuwait? Would you have stood by then? Most ot the vid that dealt with Iraq and critiqued Obama's hypocrisy on Iraq. During the campaign (and even back in 07) he was adamant that he would end it, yet it goes on.
@QuartuvLarry ROTFLOL air! I need air! God that was a good one! I need you doing what you do right now! hahahaha! mama is having a time of it and has been sooo sad.
BUT this def had a positive affect on me! : D <3333333
We'd like to thank all the McSocks for coming over to mark all comments as spam. It adds a view, so we urge you to come back each and every day to spam them all again. However, we do have veto power to restore those comments. We are judge, jury and exdcutioner. Remember my toilet-cleaning friend, he who laughs last, laughs best. If you don't like our responses, what are you going to do about it? That's right, you will do nothing.
GEAR: If it were a President Bush or McCain intervening in Libya or Yemen, there would be hell to pay. Yes, they would go bonkers. I agree with Ron Paul's view on our foreign policy and how we need to do less, not more. That's why I'm going to the caucus next year and voting for him. I know he won't vomit out a bunch of BS just to get into office, as Obama did.
UTubekookdetector 8 months ago
GEAR: The hypocrisy is staggering isn't it? Since this video was uploaded, Obama has reversed his foreign policy even further from his campaign. Obama the Senator just might impeach Obama the President. I wonder if Congress will ever actually have an up-and-down vote on our campaigns in Libya & Yemen? It seems Obama has no interest in even asking them.
UTubekookdetector 9 months ago
LOL! I can't believe I missed this! Perfect McPoopstain impression. I know it was hard not to laugh.
gworksnell 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Janitorial ineptitude." Hilarious! McStupid is the laughing stock of You-Tube and doesn't even know it!
MrLibsmacker 1 year ago
LMFAO. I am laughing so hard i have to watch this again. You are so right about mccainisthrough. He does copy and paste and still makes errors big time.
3slimdog 1 year ago
SUSHI: ok, thanks for your answer on peanut oil, it's probably not an economic winner either. Your initial statement on it made it sound as if there was some giant conspiracy against it, despite the fact that it's always been legal. I'd like to see someone drive on hemp ethanol a few thousand miles and see what his gas mileage is and if it is corrosive as say, corn-based ethanol.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Ok, you mentioned peanut oil initially, but it's not illegal and has somehow, if not magically, failed to become the renewable energy source we need. No conspiracy theory backdrop on this item?
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Ok, I just wanted to get you on record with allowing Saddam to invade Kuwait & Saudi Arabai and take them over by force. What about peanut oil? I asked you about that some time ago and you started yammering about pot again.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: I still want an answer to this question and you will answer it in your next post. I'm the host, you're the guest, that's the way it goes. Would you have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait and then possibly the oil fields in Saudi Arabia back in 1991 under G.H.W. Bush.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
@SushiHead20 Can't really blame you for wanting to do that, to be honest. This affects us all. I'm just tired of the blame game and the very real problems it's not solving. Obastard isn't even letting people band together to clean up (so don't light the match until HE is thrown in, too!)
I just think we need to be looking for solutions.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
@SushiHead20 You might find this surprising, given that I assisted kookdetector in making this video, but I'm ALSO for the legalization of hemp. (what our glorious Constitution was written upon) Now, whatever applications it can be used in combustion aside, I still don't fault ALL oil drilling for what BP did. They were lazy, cheap, and they screwed up, and they deserve what's coming to them. But recriminations won't solve anything, just like our administration hasn't. I'd like to hear ideas.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
LARRY: Good points my friend. Sushi just lets his emotions get control of him and throws the baby out with the bathwater a lot. I don't think I'm going to get an answer from him on my question.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Whatever happened to peanut oil? It's not illegal. I would wager it wasn't an economic winner, ergo, it was shelved. Your point about these renewable fuels is noted, but still doesn't answer my question: Would you have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait (and then possibly Saudi Arabia) and thus have control over a lot of oil? Would you have ignored those events? I hate to beat a dead horse, but G.H.W. Bush's actions were REACTIVE. Answer that in your next post please.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: I think drugs should be legal, but I seriously doubt your story concerning engines running on hemp and peanut oil. It's probably as likely a "success story" as ethanol and these other "pie-in-the-sky" renewable energy fads. Oil is used for a lot of things other than transportation. You should ratchet down your rhetoric, you sound like an idiot and someone might report you. I won't report that comment, but someone else might. Long story short, it was good to run Saddam out of Kuwait.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Thanks for the irrelevant info. I'm sure if peanut oil was an economic boon, some rich angel investor would've snagged it by now. So, you would've let Saddam take Kuwait and Saudi Arabia if it played out that way? And don't forget, G.H.W. Bush's actions were reactive to Saddam's actions.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Considering you (and probably Rothbard too, I would wager you repeat him verbatim) didn't know what a "palestinian" was and was utterly confused concerning two-state solution policy under Bush and Obama, we'll take that with a grain of salt. So you would let Saddam take over the oil fields of Kuwait & Saudi Arabia and thus be able to maniuplate a geopolitical spike in oil prices? G.H.W. Bush's actions during his term were REACTIVE, not proactive.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
SUSHI: Remember the last video of mine you commented on? Keep that in mind. I was told you were over here and I don't remember mentioning Israel in this vid, so keep your comments limited to the video. What would you have done when G.H.W Bush was in office and Saddam invaded Kuwait? Would you have stood by then? Most ot the vid that dealt with Iraq and critiqued Obama's hypocrisy on Iraq. During the campaign (and even back in 07) he was adamant that he would end it, yet it goes on.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
HILARIOUS Thumbs up
computerpurple 1 year ago
GOOD ONE....hat's off to you, my friend!
Kimcrawley 1 year ago
@QuartuvLarry 5'd faved and shared! Keep um comin!
TuesdayisGone08 1 year ago
@QuartuvLarry ROTFLOL air! I need air! God that was a good one! I need you doing what you do right now! hahahaha! mama is having a time of it and has been sooo sad.
BUT this def had a positive affect on me! : D <3333333
TuesdayisGone08 1 year ago
@DoctorRayBShot Yes! allllll 57!!!!!
TuesdayisGone08 1 year ago
ROTFLOL air! I need air! God that was a good one! I need you doing what you do right now! hahahaha! mama is having a time of it and has been sooo sad.
BUT this def had a positive affect on me! <3333333
TuesdayisGone08 1 year ago
McStupid, the phony doctor from Chicago is the biggest dunce on You-Tube.
MrLibsmacker 1 year ago
We'd like to thank all the McSocks for coming over to mark all comments as spam. It adds a view, so we urge you to come back each and every day to spam them all again. However, we do have veto power to restore those comments. We are judge, jury and exdcutioner. Remember my toilet-cleaning friend, he who laughs last, laughs best. If you don't like our responses, what are you going to do about it? That's right, you will do nothing.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
Yep, 5 big stars!!!!:)
Gunathand5 1 year ago
Fine job!!!!!
Gunathand6 1 year ago
You should not use the Lord's name in vain.
LizzyxDarcy 1 year ago
LIZZY: It's a parody, watch McStupid's videos on atheism and you'll see our point. We're going to respond to those at some point as well.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
@LizzyxDarcy Sorry. I AM a believer. I just couldn't help but laugh when I thought about how vehement McStain is about her atheism.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
lmao. Oh how the tide turns. I'll feature this video.
jeremyoyer1 1 year ago