Head over to the UK facebook page for Tabloid and you can post a question to ask Errol at a London preview screening of the film. The five best questions will be picked and the winners invited along to watch the film and then hear Errol's answers
Facts exist, separate from understanding or even belief. What is, is. Or, in terms Spock said so well, "Nothing unreal exists."
.
The search for truth happens because there are opinions, beliefs, faith. No one can know everything about everything, or even everything about a specific subject. So our shared knowledge is not always the truth we think it is.
.
It's amazed me in my life the people who have objected to the concept that facts exist whether we recognize them or not. Really amazing.
@CurtHowland I agree and disagree. Nothing unreal exists, yes; but not everything that exists is real. Is a story "real"? Sure, you've read words on a page, but that's not the story--you can recount it to your friend in different words. You've pictured images in your head, but those are subjective for each individual--just look at the results of bad casting for book-to-film adaptations. There are real things, tangible items that have depth, breadth, and height; but they aren't everything.
@milesbennettdyson Ideas are real, because they are real ideas. They can be right or wrong, if the idea professes to describe reality.
.
Once an idea is rendered, it becomes non-scarce. That's how I can recount a story to friends, yet the story that I heard remains exactly what it was. Can't do that with a physical object.
@CurtHowland You're using circular logic to describe the concept of "real" and "reality" here... I assume that "reality" has some measurable quantity--an objective mass, density, or some external proof of existence. Ideas cannot be measured, because they are solely the province of the perceiving individual--your idea about something can never be exactly the same as my idea. Similarly, if you lose or alter your memory about a past event, the event you perceive is never the same afterwards.
@milesbennettdyson So are you trying to tell people that ideas are not real?
.
I'm willing to accept that there is an irreducible axiom: What is is. You can call that circular logic if you want, and I'll even agree with you. I'm not going to take a hundred pages of dense logic to prove that 1=1.
@CurtHowland Of course ideas aren't real! But that doesn't mean they don't exist. You can't "measure" an idea--you can't feel the weight of it, the amplitude of the neurons firing in your brain, the body temperature you have when you think an idea--ideas are completely ungovernable by the laws of physical reality, which is why such strange things as minotaurs and Rainbow Brite have been unleashed onto the earth. But also why they remain so useful and eminently copiable!
@CurtHowland No wonder you think you're pointing out some logical flaw in my argument--you're applying a physical concept of "real" to something that can't even be measured. Was what I said my idea, or just my limited brain's way of interpreting that idea? What if you come up with better words for that idea than I did--would that then make it 'your' idea? Like i said, there are many things that aren't "real" that nonetheless exist--the fictional "Vulcan" that you quote proves my point.
@CurtHowland Uh-uh--not all reality is tangible. Otherwise, I wouldn't be able to prove the existence of anything I could not see or measure. We can't "see" inside stars or planets, but what is in there is no less real. We can't measure the electromagnetism of whole galaxies, but we can infer from small-scale elecromagnetic properties how galaxies work. You keep trying to infer that I haven't got a clue as to what I'm talking about--why is that?
Yes, I just said that. I even provided a new word for you, "intangible".
.
What I find incomprehensible is why you seem to feel the need to prove to me that things that are unmeasurable can still be real. The entire thrust of my point from the beginning is that reality exists whether anyone knows it or not.
.
"You keep trying to infer that I haven't got a clue"
Of our time? Common, it uesd to be you had to do something really stupid like go to war on false pretenses to be compared to other great douchebags like Napoleon, Ariel Sharon, the family that owned Enron,Jim Rome and Terrel Owens. But now a guy says a youtube onliner and qualifies? Im not angry, just dissapointed :)
He is just so original! I love the way he can see things from completely different angles to the vast majority of people. Whenever he talks you just can't help listening to him. Makes me wonder though if some people just don't get him...Keep up the good work Errol!
I love how you can see him pausing and choosing his words carefully instead of blathering on imprecisely.
GreeenBaron 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Head over to the UK facebook page for Tabloid and you can post a question to ask Errol at a London preview screening of the film. The five best questions will be picked and the winners invited along to watch the film and then hear Errol's answers
facebook(dot)com/TabloidMovie
phunkygal86 3 months ago
he has an amazing, almost comforting voice. you can see how he convinces people to divulge some pretty heavy secrets to him
thebleakaffinity 7 months ago
I like that monkey head in a jar at 4:00.
ebachtiar81 10 months ago
yes!
Rebeber 1 year ago
great documentarist
foa1406 1 year ago
Facts exist, separate from understanding or even belief. What is, is. Or, in terms Spock said so well, "Nothing unreal exists."
.
The search for truth happens because there are opinions, beliefs, faith. No one can know everything about everything, or even everything about a specific subject. So our shared knowledge is not always the truth we think it is.
.
It's amazed me in my life the people who have objected to the concept that facts exist whether we recognize them or not. Really amazing.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland I agree and disagree. Nothing unreal exists, yes; but not everything that exists is real. Is a story "real"? Sure, you've read words on a page, but that's not the story--you can recount it to your friend in different words. You've pictured images in your head, but those are subjective for each individual--just look at the results of bad casting for book-to-film adaptations. There are real things, tangible items that have depth, breadth, and height; but they aren't everything.
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson Ideas are real, because they are real ideas. They can be right or wrong, if the idea professes to describe reality.
.
Once an idea is rendered, it becomes non-scarce. That's how I can recount a story to friends, yet the story that I heard remains exactly what it was. Can't do that with a physical object.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland You're using circular logic to describe the concept of "real" and "reality" here... I assume that "reality" has some measurable quantity--an objective mass, density, or some external proof of existence. Ideas cannot be measured, because they are solely the province of the perceiving individual--your idea about something can never be exactly the same as my idea. Similarly, if you lose or alter your memory about a past event, the event you perceive is never the same afterwards.
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson So are you trying to tell people that ideas are not real?
.
I'm willing to accept that there is an irreducible axiom: What is is. You can call that circular logic if you want, and I'll even agree with you. I'm not going to take a hundred pages of dense logic to prove that 1=1.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland Of course ideas aren't real! But that doesn't mean they don't exist. You can't "measure" an idea--you can't feel the weight of it, the amplitude of the neurons firing in your brain, the body temperature you have when you think an idea--ideas are completely ungovernable by the laws of physical reality, which is why such strange things as minotaurs and Rainbow Brite have been unleashed onto the earth. But also why they remain so useful and eminently copiable!
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson "Of course ideas aren't real!"
.
That's an interesting idea. Of course, since you say it isn't real then you can't have had it.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland No wonder you think you're pointing out some logical flaw in my argument--you're applying a physical concept of "real" to something that can't even be measured. Was what I said my idea, or just my limited brain's way of interpreting that idea? What if you come up with better words for that idea than I did--would that then make it 'your' idea? Like i said, there are many things that aren't "real" that nonetheless exist--the fictional "Vulcan" that you quote proves my point.
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson "Real" is not a physical concept. It is itself conceptual.
.
What you have done is conflate the word "real" with the word "tangible".
.
Ideas are intangible, and real.
.
A new word for you, that will greatly reduce the confusion people have reading your words.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@CurtHowland Uh-uh--not all reality is tangible. Otherwise, I wouldn't be able to prove the existence of anything I could not see or measure. We can't "see" inside stars or planets, but what is in there is no less real. We can't measure the electromagnetism of whole galaxies, but we can infer from small-scale elecromagnetic properties how galaxies work. You keep trying to infer that I haven't got a clue as to what I'm talking about--why is that?
milesbennettdyson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@milesbennettdyson "not all reality is tangible."
.
Yes, I just said that. I even provided a new word for you, "intangible".
.
What I find incomprehensible is why you seem to feel the need to prove to me that things that are unmeasurable can still be real. The entire thrust of my point from the beginning is that reality exists whether anyone knows it or not.
.
"You keep trying to infer that I haven't got a clue"
.
Not at all. You're just deeply confused.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@milesbennettdyson he is talking about the quantum scale lolol that silly boy
123123sephiroth 11 months ago
Lovely interview with a true genius. Thank you for sharing this eloquent glimpse into what this American treasure is thinking.
gardnerc 1 year ago
wow he looks like hell
time to hit the gym errol
logant44 2 years ago
@logant44 He's almost 70, stupid!
bfthills 2 years ago
Why does he remind me of Harold Bloom?
isselman2000 2 years ago
The jewest (and greatest) of documentary filmmakers. :)
DLock04 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is this guy a jew?...Are you fucking kidding me right now?..
Listen, I don't mind comments like that when they are funny..but are you kidding me?..
If you aren't kidding..you are one of the greatest douchebags of our time!
thejudgeandthejury 3 years ago
Of our time? Common, it uesd to be you had to do something really stupid like go to war on false pretenses to be compared to other great douchebags like Napoleon, Ariel Sharon, the family that owned Enron,Jim Rome and Terrel Owens. But now a guy says a youtube onliner and qualifies? Im not angry, just dissapointed :)
STUDIO79HD 3 years ago
One of the greatest men of our time.
ldl21 3 years ago 10
my guess is; yes! he is a genius, though and should be respected!
mario4prez 3 years ago
Great man!
MattieCooper 3 years ago
Thank you so much for posting this, I am a student doc filmmaker, and I love Morris' work. This is a great study for me. Thanks again!
jcornelius84 3 years ago
He is just so original! I love the way he can see things from completely different angles to the vast majority of people. Whenever he talks you just can't help listening to him. Makes me wonder though if some people just don't get him...Keep up the good work Errol!
Blammo777 3 years ago
this video is great. it sort of renews my faith in internet video. pretty cool how its just a quick glimpse into errol morris' mind.
thirdpointmedia 3 years ago 6
"It may sound horribly grandiloquent..."
ppoppynogood 3 years ago
Great Post!!
super3man1 3 years ago