History sees the age of consent in a context of making ones' first independent choice. in medieval times we have two indicators for when society deemed a person fit for such a choice, the first was canon law wich deemed 12 years to be the earliest viable age for marriage the second coincidently was close to that and marked the end of going to school (sundayschool) and start of learnign a trait. with growing populationdensity and declining need for workforce that age went up and up
Potus will get a 2nd term. Just yesterday he broke the record for campaign donations. "Botchman" will get IOWA but I'll betcha my bottom dollar she won't ever win Minnesota again. Paul and Romney will be head to head but even then it wont be enough. The batshit neoconservative, lying, homophobic, birth er, deather, religitards will only be getting the liked minded batshit crazy sycophants to vote for them. The fox news junkies in other words, Obama isnt perfect but that man works his ass off
@holdontoyourwig Please clarify what you consider as liberal? It seems everyone has their own definition of it. As far as other nations that have already accepted homosexuality marriage equality if you will do not have negative effects. Just like there isn't before they were allowed to lawfully marry. Nothing has changed. Gays have been living as a couple as if they were married since pretty much always. A piece of paper granting it and marriage commitment is the same thing.
@splicedenergy Its impossible to define liberalism. Its has a different meaning from person to person. You might want the legalisation of all drugs for example. You may only want the legalisation of marijuana. Both are seen as liberal thoughts. I guess anything that is not legal being made legal could be described as a liberal move. At some stage you will say....STOP!! Enough is enough. Thats a step too far. If thats the case then you're not as liberal as the next person who wants that next step
Can dpr please stop taking calls from this girl? She really bothers me and I feel like she never brings anything to the conversation, just repeats the same old tired points all the others are making.
concordances point at about 11 minutes:perhaps the lack of competence in the fields of science at the leadership levels of government explain in part why we cannot get our schools proper materials on the subject, nor make science (and as a result maths) requirements ALL through school.they see no need for science, cuz it was good enough for them.also,creationists see absolutely no 'need' for anything beyond "god did it" .americans are so far behind in these subjects its startling.
There are prosecutions of those who are slightly over the age of consent , but it depends on who the Defendant is. Also, individuals who are intended to be protected by a law cannot be prosecuted under that law.
That's the thing with political assholes. It's literally going on Pascal's wager. You vote for the least damaging candidate, rather than the best one.
It's like saying, which bullet do you want to insert into your gun before you pull the trigger? The razer edged one? The ripper round? Or the high explosive round?
You're forced into choosing one of these rounds inevitably.
@JeremyAdshade Shes parroting an argument put forward by another republican that "C02 is plant food, and therefore carbon emissions are just dandy". Again, the premise is correct, plants do use C02, but that doesn't mean its not apocalypticly harmful to pump as much into the atmosphere as we do. There is no getting around the fact they're being intentionally deceitful or just plain stupid.
Georgia, oh yes, Georgia is an entire state full of religiously bigoted, willfully uneducated, intentionally uninformed rednecks. There are exceptions, of course, I am one, but, it's so prevalent that the generalization is fair. Holy fuck, I'm SO glad I'm OUT of that shitty place. Run dude! RUN! While you still can!
Hearing that Michele Bachmann is even fucking dummer than Sarah Palin... and that she's being run by her husbands agendas is extremely disappointing. But fortunately I live in Canada.
In Texas its legal for two 14 year olds to go at it, but no two individuals with more then a 3 year difference of age (and under 18) are allowed to. I'm pretty sure thats more or less how the law works in all places, am I wrong?
@JoesephKatana Dead wrong. Go to the Wiki, it's very accurate and then think about the repercusions. And then look at the differences in conviction rates and sentencing for men and women who commit the crimes. Then, look at the govt figures for the divorce rate and which gender gets the overwhelming amount of money from which gender. After all of that, I've a few websites and books you might be interested in.
@LordSlag What does divorce rate have to do with underage sex, I think you're addressing the wrong topic?
Here's what I found at Minor_(law)#United_States:
The age of consent for sexual activity is often lower than the age of majority, frequently using a graduated scale based on the difference in age between the participants. There is an absolute minimum age, however, varying from state to state, below which a minor may not consent.
@JoesephKatana No, it doesn't match what you said at all. The minimum age varies from 14 to 18. Some states have Romeo and Juliet laws and others don't. Some states have gap spans that bridge adults and minors if they're inside the gaps, some don't. You took a cursory glance and didn't actually read it. If you had, then you wouldn't have self confirmed. Whatever, it's your mind.
@LordSlag "using a graduated scale based on the difference in age between the participants." How else am I supposed to interpret that? I wasn't suggesting everyones minimum ages were as low as Texas's, I was just challanging the misconception that its flat out illegal below the "free for all" age. I've looked at about 10 states laws, and 5 have something similar to Texas's laws. Bored with it now.
Age restrictions for anything are ridiculous, baseless, and arbitrary. Look here: a 18 year old can star in a 45 person gangbang for money, but they can't drink a beer.
It is always and only about consent. Tell me of anyone who didn't make mistakes and embarrass themselves in romance. lol. There are certainly issues with manipulation, but age restrictions don't change that, at all. But they DO stop young people from letting others know what and who they are doing. Secrets are dangerous.
When I was at school I knew of a 17 year old dating a 13 year old. I don't think the 20 year old deserves to be charged alongside child molesters.
One has to take in to account that people do age at different rates. In fact, right here on youtube there used to be a very mature (physically) 13 year old dating a 19 year old.
History sees the age of consent in a context of making ones' first independent choice. in medieval times we have two indicators for when society deemed a person fit for such a choice, the first was canon law wich deemed 12 years to be the earliest viable age for marriage the second coincidently was close to that and marked the end of going to school (sundayschool) and start of learnign a trait. with growing populationdensity and declining need for workforce that age went up and up
scharrer1 6 months ago
Potus will get a 2nd term. Just yesterday he broke the record for campaign donations. "Botchman" will get IOWA but I'll betcha my bottom dollar she won't ever win Minnesota again. Paul and Romney will be head to head but even then it wont be enough. The batshit neoconservative, lying, homophobic, birth er, deather, religitards will only be getting the liked minded batshit crazy sycophants to vote for them. The fox news junkies in other words, Obama isnt perfect but that man works his ass off
splicedenergy 7 months ago
Is there an argument against open homosexuality with regard to the negatives involved in a liberal society ? Shoud all things be looked at as equal ?
I believe that the more liberal we get the less moral we become.
holdontoyourwig 7 months ago
@holdontoyourwig Please clarify what you consider as liberal? It seems everyone has their own definition of it. As far as other nations that have already accepted homosexuality marriage equality if you will do not have negative effects. Just like there isn't before they were allowed to lawfully marry. Nothing has changed. Gays have been living as a couple as if they were married since pretty much always. A piece of paper granting it and marriage commitment is the same thing.
splicedenergy 7 months ago
@splicedenergy Its impossible to define liberalism. Its has a different meaning from person to person. You might want the legalisation of all drugs for example. You may only want the legalisation of marijuana. Both are seen as liberal thoughts. I guess anything that is not legal being made legal could be described as a liberal move. At some stage you will say....STOP!! Enough is enough. Thats a step too far. If thats the case then you're not as liberal as the next person who wants that next step
holdontoyourwig 7 months ago
This is not an argument against gay rights. This is a morality question.
holdontoyourwig 7 months ago
@holdontoyourwig Then that would make everyone on the planet liberal
splicedenergy 7 months ago
Can dpr please stop taking calls from this girl? She really bothers me and I feel like she never brings anything to the conversation, just repeats the same old tired points all the others are making.
simsi1616 7 months ago
@simsi1616 I like her. She has a pleasant voice and sounds intelligent.
plus I'm getting sick of the sausage fest that normally is atheist/freethinker forums.
stiimuli 7 months ago 6
@stiimuli Agreed
DraeneirPpl2 7 months ago
Colbert 2012!! colbertsuperpac(dot)com
wristawareness 7 months ago
There should be a basic competency exam for anyone who wants to run for President.
wristawareness 7 months ago
concordances point at about 11 minutes:perhaps the lack of competence in the fields of science at the leadership levels of government explain in part why we cannot get our schools proper materials on the subject, nor make science (and as a result maths) requirements ALL through school.they see no need for science, cuz it was good enough for them.also,creationists see absolutely no 'need' for anything beyond "god did it" .americans are so far behind in these subjects its startling.
practicalmagic9 7 months ago
There are prosecutions of those who are slightly over the age of consent , but it depends on who the Defendant is. Also, individuals who are intended to be protected by a law cannot be prosecuted under that law.
wwickeddogg 7 months ago
That's the thing with political assholes. It's literally going on Pascal's wager. You vote for the least damaging candidate, rather than the best one.
It's like saying, which bullet do you want to insert into your gun before you pull the trigger? The razer edged one? The ripper round? Or the high explosive round?
You're forced into choosing one of these rounds inevitably.
Domzdream 7 months ago
what about "co2 isnt toxic it the lack of oxygen that is deadly" maybe she is looking at it that way, just a thought
JeremyAdshade 7 months ago
@JeremyAdshade Shes parroting an argument put forward by another republican that "C02 is plant food, and therefore carbon emissions are just dandy". Again, the premise is correct, plants do use C02, but that doesn't mean its not apocalypticly harmful to pump as much into the atmosphere as we do. There is no getting around the fact they're being intentionally deceitful or just plain stupid.
JoesephKatana 7 months ago
Georgia, oh yes, Georgia is an entire state full of religiously bigoted, willfully uneducated, intentionally uninformed rednecks. There are exceptions, of course, I am one, but, it's so prevalent that the generalization is fair. Holy fuck, I'm SO glad I'm OUT of that shitty place. Run dude! RUN! While you still can!
LordSlag 7 months ago 2
Hearing that Michele Bachmann is even fucking dummer than Sarah Palin... and that she's being run by her husbands agendas is extremely disappointing. But fortunately I live in Canada.
TekLok 7 months ago
In Texas its legal for two 14 year olds to go at it, but no two individuals with more then a 3 year difference of age (and under 18) are allowed to. I'm pretty sure thats more or less how the law works in all places, am I wrong?
JoesephKatana 7 months ago
@JoesephKatana Dead wrong. Go to the Wiki, it's very accurate and then think about the repercusions. And then look at the differences in conviction rates and sentencing for men and women who commit the crimes. Then, look at the govt figures for the divorce rate and which gender gets the overwhelming amount of money from which gender. After all of that, I've a few websites and books you might be interested in.
LordSlag 7 months ago
@LordSlag What does divorce rate have to do with underage sex, I think you're addressing the wrong topic?
Here's what I found at Minor_(law)#United_States:
The age of consent for sexual activity is often lower than the age of majority, frequently using a graduated scale based on the difference in age between the participants. There is an absolute minimum age, however, varying from state to state, below which a minor may not consent.
Seems to match what I said, thanks though.
JoesephKatana 7 months ago
@JoesephKatana No, it doesn't match what you said at all. The minimum age varies from 14 to 18. Some states have Romeo and Juliet laws and others don't. Some states have gap spans that bridge adults and minors if they're inside the gaps, some don't. You took a cursory glance and didn't actually read it. If you had, then you wouldn't have self confirmed. Whatever, it's your mind.
LordSlag 7 months ago
@LordSlag "using a graduated scale based on the difference in age between the participants." How else am I supposed to interpret that? I wasn't suggesting everyones minimum ages were as low as Texas's, I was just challanging the misconception that its flat out illegal below the "free for all" age. I've looked at about 10 states laws, and 5 have something similar to Texas's laws. Bored with it now.
Thanks for helping though.
JoesephKatana 7 months ago
Age restrictions for anything are ridiculous, baseless, and arbitrary. Look here: a 18 year old can star in a 45 person gangbang for money, but they can't drink a beer.
It is always and only about consent. Tell me of anyone who didn't make mistakes and embarrass themselves in romance. lol. There are certainly issues with manipulation, but age restrictions don't change that, at all. But they DO stop young people from letting others know what and who they are doing. Secrets are dangerous.
no2religions 7 months ago
When I was at school I knew of a 17 year old dating a 13 year old. I don't think the 20 year old deserves to be charged alongside child molesters.
One has to take in to account that people do age at different rates. In fact, right here on youtube there used to be a very mature (physically) 13 year old dating a 19 year old.
warriorchristian1994 7 months ago