Added: 3 years ago
From: goViSiONgo
Views: 83,274
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Pft that program u used never works. It just delays the other side a bit.

  • This isn't actual 3d. Real 3d would require two angles, and this two of the same frames side by side.

  • OK I got it but it takes so much concentration to maintain it LOL

  • YES!!! I DID IT!! Finally it's not blurry!

  • DAMMIT I CAN*T DO THIS! AM I STUPID OR WTF!

  • Comment removed

  • stereoscopic 3d requires two different angles, NOT two different time frames

    this is lame

  • its not that much 3D

  • It just kinda looks the same you know?

  • this ain't 3d I did the cross eye thing (don't say that im doing it wrong im pretty good at cross eye)

  • wich video will win the race?

  • I know how 2 make it look 3d and I do it right and it is RLY cool! I cross my eyes and focus on the middle screen it makes when I do.

  • Type MYPRIZE instead of you in youtube then hit enter

  • Its not a real 3d they are same video played like 1-2 frames behind each other. Its fake 3d.

  • @RtGFuSiOn Nope.

  • @Dragonfree97 I might refer you to 0:01 - 0:03. Right side image detonated before the left. O.k? Thanks.

  • @RtGFuSiOn Oh God, they are! I didn't notice that.

  • my fucking eyes keep em away from each other u need to focus the 2 screens to 1 right ... why doesnt this FUCKING WORK!

  • @twinkstance Because you can't FUCKING do it right.

  • Heh, fake, you forgot the momentary fireball flash-torus, and the rising shockwave vapor ring below the fireball (see youtu.be / FfoQsZa8F1c)

    It's the little details that make us go "holy crap, this is original footage."

    Also watch carefully /watch?v=LxD44HO8dNQ&feature=p­layer_detailpage#t=105s

  • Type MYPRIZE instead of YOU in youtube and hit enter

  • @thewakkichewy why?

  • If you didn't notice, there were plants and greenery before the bom, and after there was nothing but scorched flattened dirt.

  • 6 TSAR explosion or Giant Asteroids can produce 10.4 Magnitude Earthquake

  • lol total waste - just one viewport is time-displaced against the other. Definitely not the way to make stereograms ;) As long as you need the source model to get the effect to work - yeah, you fail at it unless you can make any renders instead of ripping off others' works ;)

  • uhh we dont see the bomb actually "dropping"

  • Fail-D

    come on, if this is 3-D we live in a 30-D world....

  • i just visited youtube's channel and i see the 3D's channel at the bottom and i just got addicted to it!!!

  • not 3d!!

  • GUY ITS ONLY 3 INCHES BIG!!!YOUR SCARED OUT OF YOUR FUCKING PANTS!?!?!?

  • you forgot the yt3d

  • when focused try to move your head slowly up and down (but still focus), it feels a bit like your moving high speed up and down in real life

  • take a picture of yourself when you are in 3d cross-eyed mode

  • @superluc1214 LMAO i just did it

  • That's not 3D...

  • I'm glad I can watch this in 3D on my computer so that I won't have to have the experience in real life

  • thats one huge bomb! made me want to run away from cumputer because of 3d

  • That was GREAT :D

  • its work :P

    but is not easy to hold in 3d^^

    training with the magic eyes pics... ;)

  • looks sooo fake

  • Looks fake... but so cool!

  • Didnt work.

  • The world popped a pimple.

  • holy shit!

  • guys I think chuck norris farted.

  • @thenewchance this is why you never give chuck norris tacos

  • Doesn't work - no 3D effect - and the twin images are out of sync. Worst of both worlds. Don't waste my time and vision.

  • @SSegal pretty sure i just saw it in 3D, so i guess its just your eyes.

  • @SSegal So everyone that said they saw it in 3D are just making fun?

  • @thomaskaufi Nah, i didnt think i could do it, although i sorta managed to get a blurry 3d image by doing it, so its trufax

  • @discohunter12 keep practicing, a blurry 3d image means you almost got it!

  • cool my as

  • has anybody ever messed their vision up doing this???? I dont wanna be permanently cross eyed. lol

  • 0:02 day 0:03 till 0:28 red and then again day....Totally facks the earth

  • youtube doubler makes youtube so much better..

    watch the same video at the same time then proceed to 3d!! it works!!

  • pretty realistic ^^

  • fake no 3d still 2d when croseyed i didnt see any thing come out of the demention

  • i do cross-eye but it stiil dont work ??

  • @albanieboy12 Ok First there should be 2 pictures, go ahead and do cross-eye then u will see 3 pics. focus on the middle pic and then its 3-D! note: it may need some practice

  • lol when the camera started shaking i actually thought something was about to happen to me so i got scared :(!! Damn you 3d!!11one!

  • lame... no 3d here. just two identical footages put together. if that wasnt enough they are not synchronized perfectly.... lame

  • @Mikey234432 You have to use the cross-eye technique in order to see it in 3d search cross-eye technique in youtube

  • @tasosdiamantis I know how to do fucking cross eyed... I prefer parallel and this is not 3D its jsut one video put next ot its copy with o.5 second desynch... thats not goddamn 3D... -_- learn to use your brain.

  • Successful 3D is Successful 

  • @International0IDIOT Failurish 3D is Failurish

  • wow

  • After I saw this I started clapping out of reflex, this was amazing.

  • i don't understand how to see this in 3d ? -.-

  • @madahack cross your eyes. you will see four images. You must combine the two center images so that you can view only three. you must concertrate on the center picture only! Try it with a paused video 1st.

  • @madahack you chud google cros eyed free vewing you will undersand 

  • @madahack you chud Google cross eyed free vewing

  • Holy fucking shit-EH

  • omg so amazing... it look like you're near the explosion!

    plz make more like this!

  • spilt screen!

  • @stupidcommentbelow HOW??? thats retarded. and if i did, it would be all blurring and its giving me a stigmatism.

  • and i thought one of those was bad, rofl 2 is OVERKILL

  • this gives me the creeps

  • I heared of a technologie, that you can turn every 2D Video into 3D... how should that work??? or didi you used it on this videoclip, cause I cant imagine, that they filmed this with 3d-cams...

  • it works !

  • you're all on crack, there's no 3d :P or any optical allusions.

  • It actually worked so well that I pulled myself back when the shockwave was comming

  • What´s the right way to see it?

  • @iwannapayback Cross your eyes until the 2 images match up, its called stereoscopic

  • holy shit this 3d effect made me want to turn around and run

  • @Rayden440 Mee tooooooo

    (sarcasm) lol

  • BRILLIANT!!

  • ah i see how this is done. you have to cross your eyes in a certain way to see it

  • jetzt soll man auch noch schielend youtube gucken da wirst ja blöde!!!

  • solltest schon die beschreibung lesen oder wenigstens etwas mitdenken >.>

  • Right picture is way ahead of left. Also, it looked flat.

  • The framerates makes the shaking effect better...

  • 3d??? you want kidding me!!!

  • @xxStryK3xx

    I want kidding me!! ;D

  • oh shiny Light

  • Momma always told me, life was like the cold war. If you tried real hard, you could make a TSAR and no one would fuck with you but if you get cocky and lazed around then you would be fucked by other people.

  • It not explosion of our Russian bomb РДC-202, with a trotyl equivalent of 57 Mt! On it video explosion is unlike real video of tests of hydrogen bomb РДC-202.

    It is a forgery.

    Это не взрыв нашей русской бомбы РДC-202, с тротиловым эквивалентом 57 Мт! На этом видео взрыв непохож на реальное видео испытаний водородной бомбы РДC-202.

    Это фальшивка.

  • there is no true video footage of the tsar bomb and the blast was 50 mt not 57mt its was a united states estamate but russia confermed it was a 50 mt bomb and just to let you know the us had far more nukes then russia did and 17 to 1 advantage russia lost the cold war because your economy is inferior.The United States bankrupt russia

  • You're not using enough eye separation to make this 3D-worthy; it looked flat.

    (It may be accurate. Anything over 1/2 mile distant looks flat due to lack of depth cues. If this is actual human eye separation, 1-2 inches, with the blast at fifty miles off, it would look as depth-flat as clouds in the sky do. However, that means there is no reason to present it in a stereoscopic format.)

  • I couldn't tell if the angles were altered at all, actually. It looked to me like the images were just out of sync with one another. This can produce a 3-d effect, but only if our "camera" is moving left or right around the focal point.

  • what ever method your using for camera shake doesn't match to both angles.

  • This is a recreation!

    Do some fucking research before you go post retarded comments.

    But a recreation is to show what it would have looked like, kinda.

    Just keep this in mind.

    The fireball produced had a diameter of 8km.

    The mushroom cloud had a height of 64km.

    The heat was so intense that it was able to cause 3rd degree burnings at a distance of 100km.

  • stupid ass u would be dead if you were there

  • Yes he was there.... I remember him... he is burned like me lol

  • ... thats a random blender animation... lol

  • tats not Tsar bomba

  • kaboom! teamkiller! headshot! nice shot!

  • GODLIKE!

  • that pressure looks so fucking scary:D

  • Nice.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more