NAACP Nelson Linder speaks on Ron Paul and racism

[elfil76]

The 12 dislikes are from writers of addictinginfo and TNR.

[sedj4wd]

you can not Believe in Liberty and be racist !

[jackcass7303]

Next Mr Linder will be "White- washing" for Rick Perry. You are a Linder,. The kind who will Lend a so-called Black voice to whatever the white man needs. House negro, now that you got some white renters.

[jackcass7303]

Negro Please,

Your thinking is reminiscent of a negro with tertiary syphilis. I have watched you flip flop more than a fish out of water. Malcolm X described you best a " A Negro out of his mind". Essentially, you are just looking for another white man to play Jesus. Uncle Tom butt kissin negro.

[thesoulpilots]

Apd is racist on the eastside!

[elnick1000]

Mr. Linder is the kind of person from what I have heard who should lead the NAACP.

[GypsyKing7]

..Ron Paul/Bruno 2012, Getting it on For America!

[rob80nikki]

Important New Support and Videos for RP.......More SC Senators Come Forward to Endorse Ron Paul for President! (especially the beginning :40 or so and 2:17-2:30/ 3:53-4:18)..............Intell­igence Officer: Ron Paul Is Right on Iran (1:20-2:30)..............Super­PAC Endorses Ron Paul, Raises $400,000........NAACP Nelson Linder speaks on Ron Paul and racism.....Why Ron Paul dot com

Remember, like last elections, if you want to be taken seriously, "write in Ron Paul".

[TheColbert2]

I don't have enough knowledge of Ron Paul's character to form an opinion on whether or not he's racist, but Nelson Linder is one of the most ineffective "leaders" I've ever seen. He gets absolutely no results in any situation and is basically worthless to the black people in Austin TX, and they are only aboout 8 percent of the population.

[LIBERTYALONE]

This James B. Powell guy was probably an infiltrator which was common back then in the patriot movement .. interesting how you can't find anything on the guy.

[ShnocolA]

And Princess Diana was a terrorist.

[ToxinalX]

Ron Paul have made lots of both gay and black friends throughout his career.

He is not a racist, nor is he a homophobe.

[MrJivePirate]

Folks that's the president of the NAACP speaking; Ron Paul is not racist. Period.

[subg88]

@MrJivePirate

No, that's the president of the Austin chapter of the NAACP speaking.

[Dano853]

@MrJivePirate "He is the director of thje local Austin Texas office of the NAACP". He is not the president of the whole thing. I believe that as RP supporters, we have a responsibility to report the facts accurately and avoid embelishment.. GO RON PAUL!

[ajmprovidence]

Kucinich is running stupid

[MatthewYook]

...vote Kucinich, not the sideshow



[deepfriedchocobo]

he made 1M off those newsletters, if he disagrees with them, he should return all the profit he made, or donate to charity

[nalejbank]

Ron Paul is being attacked in ways that are designed to divert attention away from the real issues that need talking about. If you view the candidates from the establishment's perspective, you will quickly pick Ron Paul as the man to stop at all costs! He is taking them head-on to expose corrupt financial dealings surrounding Wall Street and international banking and what they are doing to our money. This corrupt system is sucking the lifeblood out of all classes of people & ruining our economy!

[TroySmithforD]

The masses have been poisoned, on many levels...to not want to think, but to stay in a childlike state, and believe in superficial things and ideas..anything that takes nuance, deep thought, is simply too much work for the short attention span, malnurished mind. And most of us did it to ourselves by not taking care of our bodies, and not teaching our children and our neighbors children simple right from wrong and self determination and self sufficiency, good health for mind and body and spirit.

[peerlesslondin]

YOU SEE ALL THIS TALK ABOUT RACISM.. ITS GOVERNMENT SPONSORED. FORGET IT.. LETS JUST BE AMERICANS..EVEN IF YOU DONT LIKE RON PAUL, YOU STILL KNOW HE IS THE ONE!!!!

[JustPetre]

The more the establishment tells you who not to vote for, the more the right choice becomes clear. This is all they have to smear Paul, aside from trying to con-volute his positions, like telling people he wants to turn us into an isolationist country because we shouldn't have military bases all over the world or entangling alliances and we should instead trade freely with other countries and treat all fairly.

Racist ... the word that makes everyone run and hide, no matter how untrue.

[JustPetre]

to finish my thought ...

If the people of America, black, white brown, red and any other color you need to mention, want to save it ... this is possibly the last chance we'll get. Vote for Ron Paul 2012 and give some real hope back to America. Or vote for who the establishment keeps shoving at us and propping up, and don't be surprised when we get bamboozled again...

[waynotway]

*QUOTING COMMENTER AT YAHOO*: "An endorsement from the NAACP is as good as one from a dirty public toilet. Who are you trying to impress here, yourself?. :LOL" ~Yahoo ID: Republicans are pigs • New York • comment posted at Yahoo news', "Ron Paul Is a Dangerous Tin Man Who Has No Heart" 1 hr 39 mins ago as of 4:20am Central time

[jadedfeelings21]

Why doesnt the media show this?

[jboles633]

Dr. Paul cannot be bought but this Revolution needs our support---Donate to ronpaul2012dotcom

Thanks-you're fellow American

[exposethemall45]

The only thing the federal income tax feeds is the Federal Reserve - w/o the Federal Reserve, there would be no need for a federal income tax. The federal income tax amendment was passed in Jan. of 1913 - which provided the money for the Federal Reserve Act in Dec. of that same year. People need to understand this. The Federal Reserve is a private corp. and needs to be abolished. ------ Also, Ron Paul is NOT a racist.

[TheSigovesos]

Awsome video. Very crucial.

[rollsroyce2000]

Ron Paul will not be tempted to use the power of the one ring!!! But do believe that Obama is more of the Gollum frame of mind when it comes to power!

[americanbandwidth]

In an interview with sports radio 610 WIP in Philly, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said

"the point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn’t. But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know, well there’s a reaction that’s in our experiences that won’t go away and can sometimes come out in the wrong way. And that’s just the nature of race in our society. We have to break through it."

~~Ron Paul 2012~~

[BeantownJim]

It's the liberal's on the attack.they are terrified,thinking they are going to lose entitlements!

[747t]

@BeantownJim No, we know that the Justice Department has just ruled South Carolina's voter ID law unconstitutional. If the JD was not able to do that, poll taxes and literacy tests would return too, as well as "exceptions" for people whose grandparents voted. Do you know shit about history?

[BeantownJim]

@747t Justice dept? This is a constitutional matter!

[747t]

@BeantownJim You're absolutely right. If you look up the definition of entitlement it includes anything that is expected according to tradition and practice, including BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. However, you're entitled to use it incorrectly, according to your tradition.

[BeantownJim]

@747t tradition? you mean that taxes were illegal prior to 1933?and they are based on a non ratified 16th amendment?

[747t]

@BeantownJim Taxes were not illegal. Maybe you mean the income tax. All taxes are not unconstitutional, they are necessary for a government to function.

[BeantownJim]

@747t That's what we are going to try to change! Just like Paul said!

[747t]

@BeantownJim WHAT is what you're going to change?!? You may get rid of the income tax, but there must be some form of tax (and there always HAS been) in order to have ANY form of government, and ANY military, unless u plan to rely on direct democracy to form policy and citizen militias (using your OWN weapons) to defend us.

[LetterToVoltaire]

@747t ummmm there are a million other taxes, fees, licenses, permits that feed the system. Stop being ignorant.

[747t]

@LetterToVoltaire Excuse me? You're responding to the wrong person. All I said is that ALL taxes are not unconstitutional, which is consistent with your remark. Stop being shithead and learn how to read and COMPREHEND.

[747t]

@LetterToVoltaire The person who I was responding to said that "taxes are unconstitutional"....that's it.

[FreeinTX]

@747t The income tax on wages earned in exchange for labor performed by an employee and property taxes on private property are unconstitutional.

1896 SCOTUS ruled that taxes on labor performed as an employee is unconstitutional, and the SCOTUS has also ruled that the 16th Amendment created NO NEW TAX! Prior to 1896,there was no authority to tax wages, the 16th created "NO NEW TAXES" so there is still no authority to tax wages. And we have a RIGHT to private property, so you CAN'T tax it.

[747t]

@FreeinTX That's fine and dandy, but it doesn't cover all taxes. I was addressing a specific statement that simply said taxes are illegal. But thanks for the info anyway.

[BeantownJim]

@747t ops 1913 sorry

[ponchato]

Ron Paul was never a racist. The media is afraid.

[PeaceProsperityPrtns]

Ron Paul has 5 children and he paid for all 5 through college. He turned his name (newsletter) over to another person to publish in return he received Money. Dr.Paul is guilty of not checking the newsletter's content monthly NOT of racism.

Anyone want a scoop? Ask Lew Rockwell who wrote the newsletter !.

[NYDASH28]

I tell you, the NAACP and other organizations like that are just worthless.

[soundgarden21]

I've closely followed Ron Paul since 2007, watching many of his speeches, interviews etc etc. I literally have never seen any inclination that he is racist. MLK and Rosa Parks are two of his personal heroes, along with Ghandi for god sakes. If he was truly racist, it would have shown through somehow through his actions, or words, like if he cringed during an interview with a black man or something- its just not true.

[747t]

@soundgarden21 You need to look at the comment right below your speech about Ron loving Ghandi, MLK and Rosa parks.

[enermaster123]

pass this video on to all so that the MSM can STFU!

[Coolins335]

Racism is a collectivist ideology, Ron Paul HATES collectivism. He believes in individualism, which is incompatible with racism.

[747t]

@Coolins335 Too bad we naturally collect in groups.

[Sunny14ever]

@Coolins335 well said!

[lozoft9]

And really that newsletter is not the worst I've heard. Ever heard of Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, friggin Andrew Breitbart? Those bastards are the real loons people need to watch for and they are out there right now baking serious bread by making ludicrous assertions. Have I laboured my point enough?

[lozoft9]

I don't think Paul can be made accountable for a newsletter published in his name more than a thousand miles from his district in coastal Texas. Should he have been a little more careful? Of course, but we're talking about the days when DARPA was still working on the internet. Any published media that was not distributed in your area, you had to call up the publisher to get it through snail mail. He obviously had other things to worry about.

[peterscottfrost]

@lozoft9 That's an excellent point. It is easy to forget how much technology has advanced in such a short time.

[nrshaffer21]

@lozoft9 So far you have given the best explanation for the newsletters. I'm still pretty upset though that Ron couldn't have done something about them at the time. The last racial thing written in the report was in 94 and he endorsed the letters in 95 saying they were investment advice, so I think he took care of whoever it was writing them after 94

[nrshaffer21]

@lozoft9 another problem is that the campaign in 96 for the House seat said that the newsletters were taken out of context, but even in context they are racist. They made a huge mistake by not just denying them during that campaign.

[schillerblvd]

@lozoft9 That would fly if we were talking about one instance, but it was a pattern. Somebody was responsible for including those articles and don't you think that, if it was not Paul, that whoever exercised editorship would have been smart enough NOT TO PRINT IT? Or, at least run it by Paul? And, why were they written in the first person? Why call yourself the editor if you do not do the editing? So, some mysterious person, who nobody knows, wrote them?

[BrandonToddCarr]

Ron Paul 2012!!!

[coach107]

Something tells me that given the current media attacks on Dr. Paul for being a racist this video is going to get a lot more views......LOL

[yo6pk2go]

When is CNN going to play this piece?

[pseudonominous]

When I grow up, I wanna be black.... :|

[MacKid69]

@747t To add to my comment, I suppose you are also rightous enough to determine the penalty and the protection as well...the arguement for grand legislation ultimately fails.

[MacKid69]

@747t A protection or penalty is in fact legislation, and is subject to the morality of it's creator, therefore legislation ultimately doesn't work - goes back to Greek phils. The libertarian view is that minimal legislation is indeed more equal and moral to the individual than legislation created by individuals with a motive or immoral source. You proved my point. I suppose you are morally rightous enough to judge our legislation ?

[1GodOnlyOne]

The words that the guy being interviewed is saying are incomprehensible -- it's all pops and whistles.

Can anyone decipher it and tell me if this guy is for or against Ron Paul, please?

[SecretAgent194]

@1GodOnlyOne LMAO fix your ears. He is definitely for Ron Paul

[1GodOnlyOne]

@SecretAgent194 Okay, cool, thanks for letting me know.

I don't think that an individual who either can't speak clearly, or doesn't know how to properly work a microphone, or both, is a good endorsement, but I love Ron Paul -- thumbs up!

=)

[SecretAgent194]

@1GodOnlyOne lol you just gotta hang out with black people more. But np man

[1GodOnlyOne]

@SecretAgent194 You have no evidence that I don't hang with black people, or even that I'm not black myself.

Also, how could my hanging with black people more possibly change the fact that this man's words are incomprehensible?

[johndillinger1932]

@1GodOnlyOne Nelson called into the show on his phone...

[MrChris7582]

As a black person I support Ron Paul I dont think he wrote these news letters at all Ialso have a question if they are going to attack Ron Paul for something from almost 30 years ago why not attack all the canidates for thier whole past. Gingriches personal life.Or even how the Morman faith was force to remove several racist passages in thier bible in the 70s.saying cain was burned by god for killing able and all his desendance bear the skin of his sin.Mitt wastought to be racist since birth.

[CoralChains]

/watch?v=eMQmInReYlI&feature=y­outu.be

Anytime you see blatant smearing going on about the newsletters in the MSM please post these two links.

[MacKid69]

@747t. You cannot legislate morality at the corporate or individual level. Since individuals and groups of individuals create legislation, the risk of immoral or corrupt legislation is indeed high and creates greater imbalance than the lack of legislation at all. This is the horrible position we face today, bad legislation that is enforced with force. Given the foundation of the constitution, power to the individual, Ron Paul's and libertarian positions to rstand up to scrutiny.

[747t]

@MacKid69 Of course you can't legislate morality. You can legislate protections and penalties for people who infringe on the rights of others. Libertarians refuse to do so.

[Rootsdowntv]

Ron Paul Kicks ass

[BeantownJim]

THe U.S. constitution is self explanatory! The only problem is that the public schools and colleges do not teach the truth.They teach corriculum and political or philisophical veiws based on itinerary! (pardon the spelling)

[747t]

@eatganj You're right, he's not racist. He's a Libertarian. Libertarian's guarantee no protections to any group, because they "See people as individuals". All civil rights laws would go out the door. Ron Paul himself even said (and his son) that he would never have voted for the 14th amendment. White supremacists don't vote for him because he's racist, they vote for him because of the latent effects of his policies!

[Corvus133]

@747t They vote for him because he promotes freedom and what you don't understand is that "negative things" come with that. Gun ownership can be said to be a "negative freedom" - Ask Canadian's, they hate guns. Yet, America has it as a right. Is it fair for Canadian's to assume all Yanks are murderers? Nope. Yet, here you are assuming all Libertarians are racist for promoting freedom. You may not agree with their (KKK) racial beliefs but freedom never guaranteed you that.

[Corvus133]

@747t Hey sport, here you go: watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY

There is your proof - join the debate on that link, let's have at it. Let's see you use your failed idea of what you think Libertarian philosophy and Ron Paul are.

[747t]

@Corvus133 You miss my entire point. I never said Ron Paul is racist. I never said Libertarianism = racism. I said it ignores the fact that this society naturally groups itself according to race. Go to any school or workplace at lunch and you'll see people grouped by colors by their own choice. Libertarian policies do not eliminate race or culture. They allow the strongest to flourish because WE CANT LIVE WITHOUT ONE ANOTHER. HUMANS NATURALLY GROUP THEMSELVES AND COMPETE.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Let's make it real simple, so you can understand. White supremacists like Ron Paul because he advocates Every. Single. Thing. They stood for MINUS the open racism. He ran a racist newsletter and then distanced himself from it. He didn't have to write it. He didn't have to claim it. It's associated with him. Secession from the Union and sympathy for the Confederacy. Opposition for the 14th Amendment. Employment of and frequent association with identified racists.

[747t]

@Corvus133 You don't get it. Do you seriously think even if he was racist he would come out and say it? Do you think he personally would be caught saying something stupid? He has said absolutely NOTHING that shows him to be anti-racist. He takes the route of AVOIDANCE of the issue. He declares it a non-issue. That's not revolutionary! That's the style of the day! That's what white people want to hear, and it's GOOD ENOUGH for black people who are foolish enough to buy it.

[elitephpcoder]

@747t Thats not true at all, Paul voted for MLK day while 90 others voted against it. Paul does not VOTE the way a racist would. You people are so full of crap its unreal, on top of that the newletter being published was 1600 MILES away from where he was located. This WAS the time BEFORE the internet. People were less "communicated". Paul's voting record proves he is not a racist and I believe him because of the way he has voted. Proof is in the pudding.

[747t]

@elitephpcoder MLK wanted a poor people's bill of rights added to the constitution. He knew that poor people would never have any safety or a fair chance at playing this capitalist game until they were guaranteed some basic protections - from poverty, sickness, and discrimination. Voting for a day to enshrine someone separate from their message, and actually embracing the message are two different things. Everybody can love MLK. That doesn't mean they embrace all he stood for.

[747t]

@elitephpcoder MLK's name gets thrown around all the time by the likes of Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, as a way to get people off their back that recognize their racist agendas. We see right through them. MLK has been made into this fluffy family-friendly fairy tale that anyone can invoke. Something that he never was in life.

He was a fighter. He SAW race. He fought racism. White Supremacy to be exact. It still exists, but people stick to code words and hints.

[747t]

@elitephpcoder Once again, I never said Ron Paul was a racist. You can't blame people for thinking he is. I'm not talking about newsletters and don't try to say "you people" when a majority of people realize that States Rights = The Federal Gov stepping aside to allow discrimination. That's historical fact, its consistent, and its going on now with immigration law. When the states get their rights back, we WILL see minority rights decrease in places. Fact.

[747t]

@elitephpcoder Whether Ron Paul is racist or not is a non-issue. I suspect he's not, but it doesnt matter. What matters is he is for the good ol' boy decentralized government that, whether he means it to or not, will be a detriment to everyone but whites. THIS is why white supremacists love him - He just may be able to do what they've wanted to do for 150 years but have failed because people saw through them. Ron Paul is probably not racist, but he is the racists' last hope.

[Mijaseev]

@747t Centralization of power is a dangerous thing, especially when it is done in the name of protecting freedom (we should not need government to have control over our freedoms as they are inalienable rights). States’ rights are a way to decentralize and distribute power so that the federal government does not become tyrannical. In addition, the federal government (and government in general) is not very efficient or prudent in its dealings.

[Mijaseev]

@747t Although it claims to support equal rights, the criminal justice system (as one example) shows a different picture. The “reform” of Federal crack cocaine laws is a more specific example. The government acknowledged these as “racist laws” that target minorities at a disproportionate rate, yet refused to totally fix the law. In other words, a large percent of crack cocaine offenses will continue to go federal and result in mandatory minimums for minorities.

[Mijaseev]

@747t The government can enact as many laws as it wants to, but unless it can also change the way people think and interact, racism will continue. Focusing on changing hearts and minds through peace and dialogue is a point that all of those seeking to counteract racism can agree on. I suggest we work together on that point.

[747t]

@Mijaseev We do not have to wait on everyone to agree that the minority should be protected.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Well learned and careful whites have learned the language of pacification. Don't throw what black people think at me, because there are duped people in every facet of society. Come talk to the people I know, THEY AIN'T FALLIN FOR IT. Talk to ME, IM BLACK, STUPID. Why is it people feel they can preach to blacks about blacks using blacks as an example?!? WTF! LOL. Go eat a dick.

[DesaStables]

DR RON PAUL IS SPEAKING WORDS OF WISDOM...LET IT BE...LET IT BE...RON PAUL 2012 !!!

[Corvus133]

Racism only exists in those pointing the finger and calling others racist.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Shut up, Rush Limbaugh. Go pop some pills.

[Corvus133]

@747t WTF does that even mean? "Shut up Rush Limbaugh, go pop some pills?"

Ya, good one. Waste of time.

[747t]

@Corvus133 You obviously don't know what you're talking about regarding racism. You're spitting the same crap out of your mouth as Limbaugh.

[Corvus133]

@747t Actually I do. "Proud white supremist?" Seriously, buddy, the whole world is watching this election and we're all going "man, are American's THIS fucking stupid? To think Paul is an idiot and none of the others are?"

In Canada, Bachmann wouldn't be fit to teach grade school - go vote for her, you sound as stupid as she does.

[747t]

@Corvus133 But then again, he very well COULD be racist. He shares all of their views: The Civil War is the North's fault and shouldn't have happened, Lincoln was power hungry and instigated it. State's rights and businesses rights come before civil rights. Ask Rand Paul why he said businesses should be able to discriminate against anyone they want. He says "let the market take care of it". The market had over 100 years! The guys are confederates, by the very definition of the word.

[Corvus133]

@747t This is your failed interpretation. This is why YOU'RE saying he is racist when nothing he said has been racist. It's just you assuming everything.

If he says he isn't against outlawing the idea a business can go "no blacks" then you're right.  Society, after that, can now discriminate against that business. He is giving YOU the power. He gave the business the freedom to be stupid and now the public can have at it.

That's not racist, it's giving people the power. Think.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Once again, I never said he's racist. I said he could very well be, and be masking it very well. No interpretation is "failed". You seem to have a lack of respect for opinion, and you're entitled to that. Just understand that it goes both ways. Your ignorance decreases my respect for your views and the degree to which I perceive you to have understanding. You seem also to have a lack of understanding for nuance and detail. I'm sorry if you don't understand.

[Corvus133]

@747t "Very well be." So, here you are sounding some "elder" Wizard (you're not but nice try getting serious) and starting rhetoric about a man on "well, maybe he is racist."

Then you "school" me on "wisdom?" Here's a hot tip about wisdom - it's ageless. Here's another one - only asses assume. Right now, you're just back tracking and it's annoying and quite tiresome.

I come across people like you all the time. You don't respect me? Fine, truth sucks. Least I don't assume and backtrack.

[747t]

@Corvus133 I never back tracked once. Quote me where I contradicted myself. I have stood firm in my stance that Ron Paul's POLICIES AS A PRESIDENT WOULD set back racial policy 100 years. Philosophy doesn't do shit to government. If you're going to philosophize all day, why occupy a seat in government? He clearly doesn't. He votes. As president he would sign bills or veto them and agitate for or against laws like any president does.

[Corvus133]

@747t Oh, P.S., there's another fellow in here who said he was black and sees Ron Paul completely different from you or any other angry, overly emotional, let's make everything racist so we can complain and remain angry, etc. individual like yourself. Maybe you can engage him in a conversation and ask why 2 people of the same race aren't agreeing on something that should be as obvious as 1+1=2. I guess to you, 1+1=4.

[747t]

@Corvus133 You can try to make mathematical equations out of people's point of view all you want, but it doesn't work. You're trying to claim a monopoly on the truth, and for that YOU are the fool. You're trying to deny my claims by providing no evidence and just calling me an idiot. YOU, are willfully blind.

[747t]

@Corvus133 I assume nothing. I do infer based on historical patterns pertaining to his points of view and the people he hangs around and employs, the people that support him. If you believe everything a person says you are a fool. If you believe everything a politician says about themselves you are hopeless. I doubt you've had many elders teach you how to look below the surface and see what a politician is really about. Its a critical skill and takes practice. Better get started.

[Corvus133]

@747t I don't believe everything a politician says, However, the idiot thing about us Libertarian's is it's not us dictating policy. It's a philosophy. I can say all sorts of shit and control a Government a certain way but then it's not Libertarian, it's what you have now.

I like your continued attempts to get me to see the deep end but it's you who can't. You, by contrasting Paul, are for lobbying, corruption, and missing rights and freedoms. You're against the constitution. No respect eh?

[747t]

@Corvus133 Tell me where it is that you see Ron Paul being a racial activist? People are going around treating him like he's some sort of revolutionary. The only people he's going to help with regards to race relations are white people who feel like the government is on their back about race. Who feel like THEY'RE discriminated against. Like THEY don't have opportunities, because of Uncle Sam. Racism is the standard mode of operation of this country. Take off the reins and BLACKS LOSE

[RMT87]

@747t wow so much crap. if you really want to learn, go watch/read some Thomas Sowell and Walter E. Williams (who are both black). every argument you can possibly make can be refuted in their writings.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Stop telling people to THINK. People can think themselves into a hole. Discernment is a skill that takes a long time to develop, and I am seeing many young people that do not have that skill yet telling others to just "think" when they don't have the ability to see what is being spoon fed to them. Calling people "sheeple" and thinking you have all the answers is just going to guide you off an intellectual cliff. You're narrowing your mind by thinking only you know it all.

[Corvus133]

@747t Does it hurt when you think? You take me for some idiot fool but the fact you've interpreted Libertarian philosophy as racist, when even black people don't agree with you, is ridiculous.

All this deep insight, it's in vein. You're not deep. You're talking to a Zen Buddhist, you're going to have to dive way deeper than you are.

You've assumed, you've assumed wrong, and now you're clinging to "well he maybe is racist" as some kind of fact.

Deal with it. You're in denial. Wake up.

[747t]

@Corvus13 Maybe is never a fact. If you're not suspicious of a man who has known white supremacists working directly under him to this day and accepts their contributions, comes from the Great State of Texas, is a secessionist and "state's rights above individual rights" hard-liner, you're an idiot.

[Corvus133]

@747t As for the rest of your replies - waking up to 7 comments all insisting the same wrong perspective's, there is only one last reply to this. I chalk you up to a lost cause. You're misguided, you misinterpret, you assume, you do everything but actually look at facts. White supremest supporting Paul means nothing. They may also like Cadbury chocolate but do you condemn Cadbury company? Nope. You just condemn when it fits your perspective.

So, don't respond, you're too lost.

[747t]

@Corvus133 White supremacists support Paul because he loves everything they love. If you can't do the simple math on that, I'm sorry for you. Once again, I never said Paul was a racist. You guys are making THAT the issue, its NOT. What is the the issue is that white supremacists know the end result of Ron Paul's type of government. You can twist my words and call me racist (laughable) all you want. White supremacy is the original and only true racism. Anything else is backlash.

[KlingonSpider]

@747t did you just seriously say in your comment that only white people can be racist? lol

[747t]

@KlingonSpider No. "I said that white supremacy is the original racism." I should clarify that I mean in our modern view of race. Of course people have always viewed race differently at different points in history, and even now it is evolving. When you are marginalized by someone, you will fight back. Backlash is not racism. Black people don't go around measuring people's heads to prove their inferiority by brain size or drumming up crime rate statistics to show criminality.

[747t]

@KlingonSpider Demanding a seat at the table is not racism. Deciding to build up your community's self esteem is not racism. "Black Power" is not racism. What remains after eliminating those as "racism" is the latent anger and resentment that remains in the black community. Black supremacy ideology is EXTREMELY rare. What black people want is equality. What (some) white people want is for us to stop using the government to achieve it. Yet, without the govt, they screw us!

[747t]

@Corvus133 O wow, a guy who brags about being a Zen Buddhist. The same "Zen Buddhist" meanwhile has been calling me names and trying to debase me and my intelligence. Go fuck yourself, hypocrite.

[Corvus133]

@747t Honestly, you sound like the "Black Militant" guy from the show "Balls of Steel." You find racism in everything. Remember how this all started with me saying those calling out racists are normally racists? You're the one calling out white people, stereotyping Buddhists (might surprise you being a super nice pushover isn't in the philosophy or belief but that's the fun of stereotyping and assuming). You're the one misinterpreting full philosophies. The only thing racist here is you.

[747t]

@Corvus133 Go tell that to Stormfront. Proud White Supremacists. That's not racism? Get an education and turn off the Faux News.

[eatganj]

@747t im sure there are black militant sites that support Obama. You can't claim he's a racist because a racist group endorses him. Terrorists use Windows op system, What does that make Bill Gates?

[republicunderground]

sometimes I wonder if the people spreading all these pejoritive attack words like Racist at Ron Paul R a bunch of Neo-cons or confussed Liberals cause so far it seems to me like Ron Paul has a large black following, a large every kind of following for that matter I guess *thats the beauty of individualism*

[sibkiss2009]

If Ron Paul even hinted of being a racist in his voting record, I would not be backing him. I do not believe in races, per say, for my religious reasons, I believe we are all one race. Evolution was embraced to extremes by Hitler and his minions. People who judge a book by it's cover don't know how to read!

[sedj4wd]

Ron Paul is far from racism he lost money to keep all women and kids doctored a man that stands tall for Liberty !

[PillyAndGirl]

Blacks and white supremacists will unite if it is against jews.

[RealNewsAustralia]

@PillyAndGirl tru

[judoflipper98]

Ron Paul is a great man and God bless him. A man of true courage. Unlike Obama, Ron Paul won't lock a Black man up for smoking Marijuana. :)

[MIvarsson99]

Hey met Ron Paul ONE TIME and had one fucking conversation with him and all the sudden, he knows that Ron Paul is not racist.

Linder, you suck fucking balls.

[jstone855]

@MIvarsson99 He has known Ron Paul for over 10 years dummy

[MIvarsson99]

@jstone855 No he has not. He claims in the fucking video that he had ONE conversation with him. That is all.

But even if he had known Ron Paul for years, who cares? Don Black (founder of Stormfront) has known Paul for longer than that!!

[Popinfresh0]

@MIvarsson99 Don Black has only met Paul ONCE. You are wrong on that silly. Ron Paul is NOT a racist, get over this. Libertarians see people as individuals, not as groups.

[MIvarsson99]

@Popinfresh0 How the hell would you know how many times Ron Paul has met with Black. Have you followed these men across the country? Have you wiretapped their phone lines? There is no possible way that you could have access to the information you purport to know.

Stupid fucking Paultard...

[Popinfresh0]

@MIvarsson99 for one sun shine, if you go and do your research, and look on some thing called GOOGLE and type in Ron Paul and Don Black, it states he only met him ONCE when Don Black LIKE MANY OTHER FOLLOWERS REGARDLESS OF THEIR COLOR DONATED TO RON PAUL. :) You sure are one of them smarty pant liberals, huh?

[MIvarsson99]

@Popinfresh0 WOW.....your ignorance is truly "special."

Will a google search also reveal how many times you've fucked your girlfriend?

Obviously, in your world google has Big Brother-like insight into the personal lives of all Americans.

The master-surveillance geniuses at google have tracked Ron Paul for his entire life and they somehow know the exact number of times that he met Don Black. WOW~life is either truly fascinating or you are truly stupid.

Ron Paul and Don Black are good friends.

[Popinfresh0]

@MIvarsson99 Ron Paul is a friend of the people. :) You suck at debates because when I hit you with the facts you are now talking out of your butt. You lose. :)

[MIvarsson99]

@Popinfresh0 You could not verify any of your facts. You're the one who sucks at debates...almost as bad as Ron Paul does.

[theadmiralburns]

The man is a champion of INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY for all people. I saw him at the debate at Morgan State University in Baltimore, a traditionally black university, where the debate focused on minority issues. Ron was an ace in that debate and addressed issues concerning the minority communities in our country including the disproportionate burden on blacks in regard to the death penalty and the war on drugs. It was the debate that several GOP hopefuls decided to skip, but Ron made it.