Lots of people were inventing cameras around this time, but history teach us that we can only give credit to one person. Rarely is one person responsible for great inventions. (althoug it happens)
I'm kind of impressed with how judgmental and dismissive people are being about this picture - this guy helped to invent photography, for crying out loud; it's an invention that has had an incalculably huge effect on the modern world. Have you invented anything that will profoundly influence society for hundreds of years? No? Then maybe you're not really in a place to judge...
It is pretty hard to believe that this is the farthest back that we can go to seeing what things actually looked like. It is also pretty hard to believe that everything prior to this exact date in 1826 was purely in the hands of a painter. Just amazing I think.
I think this man is the human being the largest in the history of mankind. Because without him there would be no film, television, internet, camera, and all inventions related to such inventions. respect Mr Nicephore Niepce
the photographer called Nicephore Niepce. it is a French. He took this photo through the window on the first floor of his house in Burgundy, but it seems he took a picture of a table in 1822
The first photograph was in COLOR, taken about 1800 (!!) and was the spectrum of a star, taken at the Grenwich Observatory, a prism played the light on a specially prepared silver nitrate plate, and the way the chemical decomposed preserved the bright colors in chemical developing. (difraction grating etched into the emulsion by the light and developing).The plate is carefully preserved to this day.
It kinda looks like a picture from inside a small town. I bet they were taking boatload of pictures just out of being excited. I'd get just as excited getting a BLT. lol
8 hours exposure would have muddied the shadows but the basid forms are retained. I would give this inventor a B- . It could have been an A with a better lens and exposing one hour - same time of day over the course of 8 days.
Where EXACTLY is it . It would be great to see a duplicate of the location today. I am guessing the solid structure was thought out as a subject for the stillness required in the camera as well as the subject to expose the silver - or whatever.
Dam shame these c*nts couldnt of invented it about 50 years earlier. I always wanted to see what Marie Antoinette really looked like. Would of been better in colour too!
Wrong Film scientist Vincenzo Ruello has discovered an photographic image of Jesus Christ 3 days before the Shroud of Turin see main clip in channel First Photograph Ever Taken Historical Discovery
Did some searching on the Inet, and this really seems to be in 1826 THE first Photo ever taken. The object was irrelevant for taking the picture, ofcourse: first picture taken, ever, in history of mankind. If i try realizing, to me the object might as well be just a boring brick.
Required eight hrs. of exposure? So you're saying that person in the picture stood there for eight hours, maybe walked away for a few minutes, and then back again? He only could of done it that way, and remembered his pose upon his return. That is the main reason you cannot believe everything you read!!!
@TheBlizzardcat photography was invented in 1826, not everything you read or research in text books is true Thomas edison is credited for creating the motion picture camera, however several artists before him such as the Lumiere brothers and Georges Melies were tinkering with cinema long before him
What in god's name did the photographer think? "Hey I'm just taking the first picture ever, making it one of the most important photographs in the history of mankind. Okay I'll fotograph some guys that randomly hang around."
@KingsPowerSteel That might be exactly what the photographer was thinking. Do you think that the photographer was trying to find the ultimate place or best pose or the perfect lighting etc. to take the first picture ever? Just curious
@JumpOffACliff100 Wtf this is... -_-'. Well you got to be stupid or completly brainless you fkin t-shirt... It's the first PICTURE EVER. That's it! Blacony or not, this guy have made more than you'll ever do in your life so respect THAT for what it is you little superficial teen... Not only this guy invented the camera, but we almost own him the invention of the movie because it all started with the photography...
I wonder what the photo was of. I also wonder what the photographers thought of this. Probably not knowing any better I wonder if they were amazed or impressed?
its a garden from an obsucre angle. i think the white slab is the lawn reflecting sunlight is so bright coz early cameras picked up light better than dark things hence the bright lights used in early cameras
this is actually a failed transmission by the rogue squadron. As you can see they were transmitting a picture of a mark IV imperial star destroyer (triangular shape) but instead there transmission failed and was sent to us. thank you for your time
by the way you Ladies and "too" GENTLEmen of today, if it's a Star Destroyer, then that means George Lucas is a F***ing Copy Cat! :) 1: They had poor quality of image in the beginning, 2: they got better images, 3: the images led to movies, 4: the movies led to horrible poor quality storylines of TODAY!. I wonder what the future will say about us.. and today's seemingly addiction to recreate stuff because of today's inability to be original.
this photo is the reprint of the original, search for the first picture even taken and see the original. Stop calling the past ''stupid or scary'' what's so scary about the past?
I would love to see our forefathers again just so they can put a boot up most these kids A**es in our country today! At least the first pic was taken of some scenery, and not their butt.. haha!
thanks to anybody who preserves anything as best as possible in it's origional, unaltered untouched condition, and thanks for putting it up. Crude renditions like this were the forerunners of your cell phones that have a mini digital camcorder that can record in high definition. Respect your past. Somebody 200 years ago did this for you.
this is a view out of a window onto the surrounding buildings. The big white spot in the middle of the picture is the roof of the building across from the photographer, with the sunlight hitting it. You can also see a tower structure of some sort to the right of this, and on the far left of the photo, some sort of wall with a tower at the end.
It's a good thing that the guy who took this photo picked the right time to take it. At any other time of day: the earth's rotation would have royally messed up the lighting and nothing in this photo would be recognizable so its fortunate that the photographer picked just the right window of time for the camera to get its exposure. Needless to say that it would have been agonizingly boring for a person to stand in front this camera for 8 hours to get a picture of himself.
really hard to explain the picture even if you say this was taken from a window i still can't see 100% if it is or not and can anyone tell me whats that thing on the left? looks liike a cage
fantastic. and also mysterious and creepy. i mean, i know that it's a view from a window over a roof and a chimney to the right, it could very well be a guy looking down at a table or something. first picture and waldo's already in it ;)
Thomas Wedgewood took earlier photographs, but was unable to fix them. They would fade away as you were looking at them. It was Niepce who was first able to fix a photograph. This "first photo" was made with bitumin coating on a pewter plate, and the fixative was oil of lavendar.
is it me, or the center but upper left it looks like 2 people looking down at a map. 8 hours of time exposure? scarey that we're only like 15 years away from that being 200 years old. Possibly even some of our forefathers still lived that year.
@garyhosty When you wake up tomorrow, start making a camera. Don't look at books or anything before hand either. I bet you would end up thinking they were actually pretty smart. Much smarter than you expect.
@garyhosty Back then things were very new to people. You take your throwaway camera for granted, but back then it was still very new technology. It doesnt mean they were dumb but that they just didnt know how to do things like that yet. I'd like you see you try and get a picture to look good at the time period this one was taken. It takes quite a lot of knowledge and skill to take pictures with older cameras.
@garyhosty you are such a fucking retard. if it werent for these people, you wouldnt have your cameras to capture family moments and shit like that. try having some respect for history fucking dumbass.
@garyhosty Hahahaha! All I can do is laugh at that comment. It makes no sense. If it wasn't for all these people 'in the past' as you put it, you wouldn't have any of the things you have today. TVs, cameras, I could go on. You should respect previous generations for giving us the things we have today
Nicéphore Niépce's earliest surviving photograph of a scene from nature taken with a camera obscura,
View from the Window at Le Gras (1826) He began experimenting to set optical images in 1793. Some of his early experiments made images, but they faded very fast. The earliest known, surviving example of a Niépce photograph (or any other photograph) was created in 1825.[14] Niépce called his process heliography, which literally means "sun writing"--Wikipedia
on first time i thouth there are a man crying near of coffin (midle view)...and after a saw there a roof...yeah midle view a part of roof near of that roof a another house.
a think this photo was photographed trough the window
on first time i thouth there are a man crying near of coffin (midle view)...and after a saw there a roof...yeah midle view a part of roof near of that roof a another house.
a think this photo was photographed trough the window
fuck all ignorant douches going like "wow hd" "thats shit" "man its blueray!" seriosly fuck you guys, this is where it all began without a start you wouldnt have your HD cameras and all that stuff, respect that, but i guess im just trying to explain it to 12 or 15 year olds
Well in photography the exposure is the amount of time that the shutter is open and the film/sensor is exposed to light. So basically the camera sat there with it's shutter open for eight hours
This has been flagged as spam show
what is it ? i know its 1826 and first photo but it would be intresting to know what it is ? is it window's down on the right ?
derangedslayer1 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
derangedslayer1 2 weeks ago
Its shit
cymrutroll 3 weeks ago
@cymrutroll So is your comment, troll.
jarjon76 1 week ago
just amazingg
LiveThug21 1 month ago
HD!
TCfoxs 1 month ago
whats doing that DJ on the photo...mixing for some samurai's?
Miroslawsnketr 1 month ago 3
I thought it was a screamer.
imalamboman12 1 month ago
im just curious, what is this?
ericinghammontevista 1 month ago
@ericinghammontevista To answer your question, the picture is of a rooftop, overlooking a courtyard, taken from a 5th floor schoolhouse in France...
GemCan78 1 month ago
Lots of people were inventing cameras around this time, but history teach us that we can only give credit to one person. Rarely is one person responsible for great inventions. (althoug it happens)
EvilPoet85 1 month ago
I'm kind of impressed with how judgmental and dismissive people are being about this picture - this guy helped to invent photography, for crying out loud; it's an invention that has had an incalculably huge effect on the modern world. Have you invented anything that will profoundly influence society for hundreds of years? No? Then maybe you're not really in a place to judge...
plushsnail 1 month ago
So what's the thing in the middle? A giant cheese?
Ronaldinhoo11 2 months ago
that just dissapoints me because i mean WTF is that a cheese in the middle of the arena in harry potter 2 haha
trentoboy260 1 month ago
true
bestinnorway 2 months ago
if i had that kind of picture in my cam, i would simply delete it....
HeyArgh 2 months ago
It is pretty hard to believe that this is the farthest back that we can go to seeing what things actually looked like. It is also pretty hard to believe that everything prior to this exact date in 1826 was purely in the hands of a painter. Just amazing I think.
PoliMeim 2 months ago
"That's bullshit, I'm not paying for this one..."
Overheard at CVS Pharmacy later that day.
CoachG1000 2 months ago
I think this man is the human being the largest in the history of mankind. Because without him there would be no film, television, internet, camera, and all inventions related to such inventions. respect Mr Nicephore Niepce
freoltic 2 months ago
Can you stay 8 hours still, I do not think. so he took the court of his house
freoltic 2 months ago
the photographer called Nicephore Niepce. it is a French. He took this photo through the window on the first floor of his house in Burgundy, but it seems he took a picture of a table in 1822
freoltic 2 months ago
im pretty sure thats an F/A-18 Hornet :/
thecitizenme 2 months ago
doesn't look that old..
SignorThomasino 2 months ago
i wanna say that its a picture of a dam.
humanidt 3 months ago
I think it's a dusty courtyard, but ,...
The first photograph was in COLOR, taken about 1800 (!!) and was the spectrum of a star, taken at the Grenwich Observatory, a prism played the light on a specially prepared silver nitrate plate, and the way the chemical decomposed preserved the bright colors in chemical developing. (difraction grating etched into the emulsion by the light and developing).The plate is carefully preserved to this day.
EmmetEarwax 3 months ago
It kinda looks like a picture from inside a small town. I bet they were taking boatload of pictures just out of being excited. I'd get just as excited getting a BLT. lol
JustComments90 3 months ago
8 hours exposure would have muddied the shadows but the basid forms are retained. I would give this inventor a B- . It could have been an A with a better lens and exposing one hour - same time of day over the course of 8 days.
me3tv 3 months ago
Where EXACTLY is it . It would be great to see a duplicate of the location today. I am guessing the solid structure was thought out as a subject for the stillness required in the camera as well as the subject to expose the silver - or whatever.
me3tv 3 months ago
Dam shame these c*nts couldnt of invented it about 50 years earlier. I always wanted to see what Marie Antoinette really looked like. Would of been better in colour too!
ForeverComplaining 3 months ago
can i trade me t2i for that camera ?
westinmcleod 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lasurubens What was that picture supposed to be of and what year was it taken?
67nairb 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is this supposed to be a picture of?
67nairb 3 months ago
Wrong Film scientist Vincenzo Ruello has discovered an photographic image of Jesus Christ 3 days before the Shroud of Turin see main clip in channel First Photograph Ever Taken Historical Discovery
TheRockinvinny 3 months ago
@TheRockinvinny
Take your religious garbage somewhere where people might be stupid enough to believe it. People like you are a disgrace, trying to rewrite history...
piip4 3 months ago
@TheRockinvinny wow you are stupid
rsscsa01 2 months ago
This ain't the first, this is the first picture made in france.
RockForLife02 4 months ago
@RockForLife02 Wich , this is france :o
CrASYmUZIk 3 months ago
Did some searching on the Inet, and this really seems to be in 1826 THE first Photo ever taken. The object was irrelevant for taking the picture, ofcourse: first picture taken, ever, in history of mankind. If i try realizing, to me the object might as well be just a boring brick.
Ullyvean 4 months ago
Required eight hrs. of exposure? So you're saying that person in the picture stood there for eight hours, maybe walked away for a few minutes, and then back again? He only could of done it that way, and remembered his pose upon his return. That is the main reason you cannot believe everything you read!!!
Unique2doU 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't understand what has been used to make it
6DeepKey9 4 months ago
photography invented 1839.
anyone explain how possible before this date?
TheBlizzardcat 4 months ago
@TheBlizzardcat photography was invented in 1826, not everything you read or research in text books is true Thomas edison is credited for creating the motion picture camera, however several artists before him such as the Lumiere brothers and Georges Melies were tinkering with cinema long before him
JESSIEEDSELL21 4 months ago 29
@JESSIEEDSELL21 But, as with many of the earliest photographs, it was too fuzzy due to the long time needed for exposure.
1958debs 3 months ago
@TheBlizzardcat This was probaly the prototype that lead to the advancement which came in 1839
d14d 3 months ago
@TheBlizzardcat Chuck Norris was the photographer.
ericawesomo 3 months ago
What in god's name did the photographer think? "Hey I'm just taking the first picture ever, making it one of the most important photographs in the history of mankind. Okay I'll fotograph some guys that randomly hang around."
KingsPowerSteel 4 months ago
@KingsPowerSteel That might be exactly what the photographer was thinking. Do you think that the photographer was trying to find the ultimate place or best pose or the perfect lighting etc. to take the first picture ever? Just curious
krstnlhjt 4 months ago
Very cool just wish i knew what it was.. mystery.
MelissaTicky 4 months ago
It took 8 hours of exposure ..? Its like the bird in the camera in the flinstones
TheCreator4 4 months ago
1826 Bethoven was still Alive!
pasmoressj2 4 months ago
@pasmoressj2 That's exactly what I thought :O
orphyborphy 4 months ago
its a bloke with a large piece of gouda in his hands
Chubstanley 4 months ago
haha i love the HD Quality 1080p :)
hallzie1nick 4 months ago
I remember seeing this in a good mag years ago (70s) called "Parade"
It is a photo of a roof top.
MrPetewingnut 4 months ago
@jaspertheredn Ahahaha. Ah-... Kids these days.. You're calling the photographer a horrible horrible name because of what he took a photograph of?
2tur 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why couldnt the just taken a normal picture of a face or a plant
JumpOffACliff100 4 months ago
@JumpOffACliff100 why cant you just accept the picture for what it is and realize that its the first photograph ever taken and stop criticizing it.
JESSIEEDSELL21 4 months ago 55
@JESSIEEDSELL21 because it was to be a picture we could always remember. and i dont know wat the fuck this is
JumpOffACliff100 4 months ago
@JumpOffACliff100 it was the dudes balcony
multiyapples 4 months ago
@JumpOffACliff100 Wtf this is... -_-'. Well you got to be stupid or completly brainless you fkin t-shirt... It's the first PICTURE EVER. That's it! Blacony or not, this guy have made more than you'll ever do in your life so respect THAT for what it is you little superficial teen... Not only this guy invented the camera, but we almost own him the invention of the movie because it all started with the photography...
JoSeVeNJo 4 months ago
@JoSeVeNJo fag
JumpOffACliff100 4 months ago
@JESSIEEDSELL21 To be fair it is a fucking awful picture.
IVIerkBlitz 4 months ago
@JESSIEEDSELL21 lol oooooooooo... meeeeeooow!
chrisjarram 3 months ago
@JESSIEEDSELL21 What is the picture of, Exactly? I believe i see a man beside what looks like a coffin, But that's just me.
malcolmmorin 2 months ago
@JESSIEEDSELL21 Photographys all about the negatives ;)
probemunky 3 weeks ago
@JumpOffACliff100 Because back in 1839 there were no plants and peoples faces looked alot like spatchulas. I understand your pain.
MrBeautifulba1 2 months ago
1826! That's amazing. Seriously, I wouldn't have a clue how to make a can opener for god's sake.
DanikaJadeee 4 months ago
I wonder what the photo was of. I also wonder what the photographers thought of this. Probably not knowing any better I wonder if they were amazed or impressed?
TheProjectMJ 5 months ago
That was taken during the enlightenment! Before Victoria was even crowned!
BTW: It's hard to make out what's the photo of?
Herbsandspices100 5 months ago
its a garden from an obsucre angle. i think the white slab is the lawn reflecting sunlight is so bright coz early cameras picked up light better than dark things hence the bright lights used in early cameras
adamdd09 5 months ago
this photo is actually better than most things. I want this on a shirt
wordupassholes 5 months ago
wow only 5 years after napoleon died. very interesting thanks for upload..but what is that slab in the middle ? any ideas ?
crazyknight2008 5 months ago
@crazyknight2008 Maybe its water and the reason for the water to be in a a straight line formation is because it might be a dock or a port area.
SchMeisterMi 5 months ago
@crazyknight2008 it is a roof
freoltic 2 months ago
This looks better than my cell phone camera. Why do they put such shitty cameras in cell phones?
xDONTxTREADxONxMEx 5 months ago
wats dat? i dont get it
ultravioletgaia 5 months ago
nikon is better
mazen42007 6 months ago
hahahhahahaha you took this photo with potato? buahahha
kickalion 6 months ago
@kickalion no this is actually the longest existing photo ever taken, from france, circa 1826. . read up
bphatboyjohn123 5 months ago
this is actually a failed transmission by the rogue squadron. As you can see they were transmitting a picture of a mark IV imperial star destroyer (triangular shape) but instead there transmission failed and was sent to us. thank you for your time
TrollReviewer 6 months ago 2
@TrollReviewer No.
BeastlySeth 6 months ago
I'm sure many others have pointed this out but it wasn't the first photograph taken, it was the first in which the image was fixed.
gh30 6 months ago
@gh30 its the first in meaning its only one that lasted, the first were actually destroyed by accident. .
bphatboyjohn123 5 months ago
today i take photos with my telephone...wow...
DjOxymoron 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
by the way you Ladies and "too" GENTLEmen of today, if it's a Star Destroyer, then that means George Lucas is a F***ing Copy Cat! :) 1: They had poor quality of image in the beginning, 2: they got better images, 3: the images led to movies, 4: the movies led to horrible poor quality storylines of TODAY!. I wonder what the future will say about us.. and today's seemingly addiction to recreate stuff because of today's inability to be original.
dationnation 6 months ago
Comment removed
dationnation 6 months ago
this photo is the reprint of the original, search for the first picture even taken and see the original. Stop calling the past ''stupid or scary'' what's so scary about the past?
I would love to see our forefathers again just so they can put a boot up most these kids A**es in our country today! At least the first pic was taken of some scenery, and not their butt.. haha!
dationnation 6 months ago 7
Comment removed
dationnation 6 months ago
esto lo había leído, una ovejita del ganado fue el primer documento fotógráfico, que bonita jeje
fjfjfq 6 months ago
Wow, biggest slice of pizza ever!
4thel0ve 6 months ago
So that settles it.The camera was invented by a guy who kept seeing this ufo and needed a way to prove it to people. yep, case closed.
Nakor420ish 7 months ago
thanks to anybody who preserves anything as best as possible in it's origional, unaltered untouched condition, and thanks for putting it up. Crude renditions like this were the forerunners of your cell phones that have a mini digital camcorder that can record in high definition. Respect your past. Somebody 200 years ago did this for you.
MrNightOwL100 7 months ago 8
looks like you are watching a dream
EdgeRatedR007 7 months ago 2
spaceship!!!
majician782 7 months ago
Napoleon had only been dead for five years!
squamish4244 7 months ago
when I look at this picture, my first thought is always that it looks like a motorboat
PopGracewood 8 months ago
wehn I look at this picture, my first thought is always that it looks like a motorboat
PopGracewood 8 months ago
the first picture every taken! spooky, but amazing :)
20rhubarb 8 months ago
well it would help if we knew what the fuck the picture is of!
whole27 8 months ago
Wow! Whats this in the picture?
To652 8 months ago
It's a Star Destroyer!
CommanderTarkin 8 months ago
these days, we would think the picture is edited. ;p
chichcabob 8 months ago in playlist Art of Photography - Masters II
I found Waldo.
undisputed4life 8 months ago
8 hours for a pic wow
mcdom89 8 months ago
this is a view out of a window onto the surrounding buildings. The big white spot in the middle of the picture is the roof of the building across from the photographer, with the sunlight hitting it. You can also see a tower structure of some sort to the right of this, and on the far left of the photo, some sort of wall with a tower at the end.
LadyOfRawFood 8 months ago
It's a good thing that the guy who took this photo picked the right time to take it. At any other time of day: the earth's rotation would have royally messed up the lighting and nothing in this photo would be recognizable so its fortunate that the photographer picked just the right window of time for the camera to get its exposure. Needless to say that it would have been agonizingly boring for a person to stand in front this camera for 8 hours to get a picture of himself.
Quikquik98 8 months ago
What is on the picture, that triangle thingy. anyone know.......?
APC9040 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@APC9040 View from the Window at Le Gras
ItIsRainingBlood 8 months ago
@APC9040 its a building
enemybowtie 8 months ago
@APC9040 I THINK it's water, not sure though.
Satituite 8 months ago
@APC9040 I don't know but I can't wait until they make a poster of this.
NaziFrocioNigga 8 months ago
@APC9040 Many said that was the illuminati base area.
bluemoonmanchester 8 months ago
what... is it
supermark64 8 months ago
@supermark64 View from the Window at Le Gras :)
ItIsRainingBlood 8 months ago
Wow. That's almost 200 years ago. A little creepy.
mrkrisis 8 months ago
If you look at it the right way, the big triangular thing in the middle kind of looks like an Imperial Star Destroyer lol
AlienBeliever897 9 months ago 76
@AlienBeliever897 You sir, are the biggest geek I have ever seen on the web. "gives medal"
AGIANTWHITEFRAT 8 months ago
@AGIANTWHITEFRAT I am truely honored :D
AlienBeliever897 6 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 That explains: "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away"!!
MaestroFire 7 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 The ALIENS ARE COMING!
dragon71422 7 months ago
@dragon71422 Holy Shit, I better get to my bomb shelter! :D
AlienBeliever897 7 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 Well, this picture was taken a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....
TheBadShaman 6 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 It just looks like a house to me.
SmilingProtoss 6 months ago
@SmilingProtoss I learned about this in my photography class. It was taken from a bedroom window.
HelloZombie1 6 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 SO STAR WARS HAPPENED IN 1826!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Herodude892 4 months ago
@AlienBeliever897 Wow, that's exactly what I was just thinking!
toxie95 4 months ago
everytime I see this it always looks like a painting or something drawn in charcoal but it's still fascinating nonetheless
Anglynn74 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I bet that guy posted that on his facebook.
undisputed4life 9 months ago
really hard to explain the picture even if you say this was taken from a window i still can't see 100% if it is or not and can anyone tell me whats that thing on the left? looks liike a cage
VivienForum 9 months ago
HD!
RafaelD1994 9 months ago
fantastic. and also mysterious and creepy. i mean, i know that it's a view from a window over a roof and a chimney to the right, it could very well be a guy looking down at a table or something. first picture and waldo's already in it ;)
dancress 9 months ago
Thomas Wedgewood took earlier photographs, but was unable to fix them. They would fade away as you were looking at them. It was Niepce who was first able to fix a photograph. This "first photo" was made with bitumin coating on a pewter plate, and the fixative was oil of lavendar.
kinbotest 9 months ago 2
Most cell phone pics look like that, has technology really improved that much?
toucansam3 9 months ago
what is it?
normandyangel 9 months ago
what is the pic of?
normandyangel 9 months ago
is it me, or the center but upper left it looks like 2 people looking down at a map. 8 hours of time exposure? scarey that we're only like 15 years away from that being 200 years old. Possibly even some of our forefathers still lived that year.
coptersoisoi 10 months ago
great quality, lol
100irissa 10 months ago 2
They are dead now. Hmmm, not only that, but they are REALLY dead. Like decomposed and forgotten dead. Creepy. O_o
ExesAndOwes 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its rubbish - my throaway takes much better pictures, the past was really rubbish wasn't it ? they must have been real dumb.
garyhosty 11 months ago
@garyhosty oh yeah they were soo dumb, they invented the camera you dumb ass! if it wasn't for them, you wouldn't have your precious throwaway
unofficialdear 10 months ago 57
@unofficialdear Sarcasm
GilucZ 8 months ago
@garyhosty
Your a retard!
beatsanctuary 9 months ago
@beatsanctuary Sarcasm
GilucZ 8 months ago
@garyhosty When you wake up tomorrow, start making a camera. Don't look at books or anything before hand either. I bet you would end up thinking they were actually pretty smart. Much smarter than you expect.
justbeentowashington 9 months ago 3
@garyhosty Back then things were very new to people. You take your throwaway camera for granted, but back then it was still very new technology. It doesnt mean they were dumb but that they just didnt know how to do things like that yet. I'd like you see you try and get a picture to look good at the time period this one was taken. It takes quite a lot of knowledge and skill to take pictures with older cameras.
Utzuki 8 months ago 2
@Utzuki Sarcasm
GilucZ 8 months ago
@garyhosty you are such a fucking retard. if it werent for these people, you wouldnt have your cameras to capture family moments and shit like that. try having some respect for history fucking dumbass.
deathknigt3000 8 months ago
@garyhosty Hahahaha! All I can do is laugh at that comment. It makes no sense. If it wasn't for all these people 'in the past' as you put it, you wouldn't have any of the things you have today. TVs, cameras, I could go on. You should respect previous generations for giving us the things we have today
BethanM190 7 months ago 5
@garyhosty LOL. I think people today are dumber... you for example!
Kuti210 6 months ago
@garyhosty
wow - just wow... do a little research, fella
df61660a 5 months ago
@garyhosty Omg you are such a fucking retard
xKoruunx 4 months ago
Nicéphore Niépce's earliest surviving photograph of a scene from nature taken with a camera obscura,
View from the Window at Le Gras (1826) He began experimenting to set optical images in 1793. Some of his early experiments made images, but they faded very fast. The earliest known, surviving example of a Niépce photograph (or any other photograph) was created in 1825.[14] Niépce called his process heliography, which literally means "sun writing"--Wikipedia
clintonearlwalker 11 months ago
Google pictures are worse then this XD
whopper1209 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
on first time i thouth there are a man crying near of coffin (midle view)...and after a saw there a roof...yeah midle view a part of roof near of that roof a another house.
a think this photo was photographed trough the window
MyDarknessFall 11 months ago
on first time i thouth there are a man crying near of coffin (midle view)...and after a saw there a roof...yeah midle view a part of roof near of that roof a another house.
a think this photo was photographed trough the window
MyDarknessFall 11 months ago
wow 8 hours, its a good thing none of his slaves knocked the camera over
C0LL1N 11 months ago
what ISO were they using?
BerkeleyBuilt 11 months ago
Also I forgot to add that this is a picture of a watercolor painting that is meant to resemble the photo in question.
Jadama0 11 months ago
I see two men leaning over a table or board of some kind.
Jadama0 11 months ago
Cool
DragonStomp365 11 months ago
lol wth is it supposed to be? To me it looks like a darth vader ship XD
crazynintendoguy 11 months ago
looks like a spaceship in the middle if you look reeeeal close lol
CoreysOldLady 11 months ago
This is fucking creepy as shit (for some reason).
Ghoopty 11 months ago
@Ghoopty i know, just take a couple seconds to think and it'll just wierd ya out wont it?
christhetromboneguy 11 months ago
it could of been possible that there was a human in that photograph, its quite obvious 8 hours was drasticly long in that case.
but in 1826?! I'd wait a few days!...
ProductionsHead 1 year ago
The world's earliest motion picture : Roundhay Garden Scene 1888 (Louis Le Prince)
The first photo : View from the Window at Le Gras 1826 (Nicéphore Niépce)
The first sound ever recorded : Au clair de la lune 1860 (Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville)
All of these inventors were FRENCH.
THANK YOU FRENCH PEOPLE ! YOU MAKE PROGRESS HUMANITY !
Hippoclite 1 year ago
hold on... i think that's my great great grandfather!!!
nimpo46 1 year ago
i need to upscale this and transfer it onto blueray so i can see its full detail
123coxy123 1 year ago
fuck all ignorant douches going like "wow hd" "thats shit" "man its blueray!" seriosly fuck you guys, this is where it all began without a start you wouldnt have your HD cameras and all that stuff, respect that, but i guess im just trying to explain it to 12 or 15 year olds
Sevilou 1 year ago
i still got a fake version of my grand grand parents on a wedding the original is gone
i dont know when the picture is taken it looks pretty old to me.
my grandma told me its taken in the year 1899
TheBadbloke 1 year ago
i still got a fake version of my grand grand parents on a wedding the original is gone (for some reasons).
i dont know when the picture is taken it looks pretty old to me.
my grandma told me its taken in the year 1899
TheBadbloke 1 year ago
What is it??
iluvlasagna22 1 year ago
Lol what does 8 hours exposure mean? Does it mean like the camera was left there for 8 hours to process the whole picture or something?
sengelle 1 year ago
@sengelle
Well in photography the exposure is the amount of time that the shutter is open and the film/sensor is exposed to light. So basically the camera sat there with it's shutter open for eight hours
Videogamehistorian00 5 months ago
@Videogamehistorian00 Oh wow. Can't believe how far photography has gone since then. Nowadays, it's just a flash that captures it all so quickly.
sengelle 5 months ago
star destroyer
WAHT97 1 year ago
star destroyers -_-
WAHT97 1 year ago
*after taken* This is so going on youtube
DanceroidCPTV 1 year ago
Looks like a Cezanne.
BillDFC 1 year ago