@houshidar558 haha no shit? Just because the engine flamed out does not just mean compressor stall, it could also be FOD. Thanks for taking my comment so seriously though lol
@gypsykingg no, this is a compressor stall a flame out wont have that gush of flames shooting from the back that's obviously a stall, no one can red a damn comment and think there "Joking">
@putman201 airplanes are so technologically advanced that sometimes we tend to overlook what they're designed to do, now the 777, not sure about this 747, but im sure they're some out there like it, have a system on board, where in case of an engine failure on take-off,maintains the course of the aircraft,i.e, centreline, and of course the plane rejects the take-off.
FADEC. Fully Automated Digital Engine Control. Just about all the newer planes have it. You tell the engine how much thrust you want, it does it. However, you cannot change the fact that when an engine blows, you have asymmetrical thrust. ie the left side engine is still producing full thrust and the right is zero. therefore the plane turns in the direction of the inoperative engine. There is no program I know of that overcomes this or physics. And it certainly will not override the pilot.
Think about it... do I want the machine telling when to abort a takeoff when in certain scenarios before v1 I should continue? I know training says cut before v1 for certain malfunctions rather then risking it but I want the choice to be mine. Not a machines. And incase you are wondering, I am a commercial pilot. The only machine up there to maintain centerline and making decisions to abort take off or continue is the lump of meat manipulating the controls, nothing else.
lol, well im just a private, but im relaying info that was explained,by a british airways "lump of meat", what he said, is that once the aircraft loses an engine on the takeoff roll, id guess it's the FADEC, but the aircraft maintains it's heading, so taking into consideration, that the autopilot and flight director, already can calculate and readjust for different speeds in flight,weights,c.g's, winds and any other factor that would alter the balance,would it not be possible for the aircraft to
@putman201 maintain its heading even after an engine loss? if u are able, try to ask around to see what's the possibility of this being true. and with regards to the rejected take-off,i didnt mean to imply that the aircraft stops on its own,this only happens when the pilot retards the throttle on the take-off roll, hence it's the pilot's decision still, if he wants to take-off or abort.
By the way, engine number 1 is the critical engine on a 747, which means that in case of failure during take-off, provokes the greatest drag and "problems" to the pilot... they were lucky that engine blow was so soon, before V1...
Tio joder la mejor aerolinea del mundo ¡ IBERIA tio la virgencita del despegue. No le has puesto florecillas antes de salir al ruedo tio. Ha explotado el motor .
V2 is the minimum safe take off speed. So a pilots call out would be V1. (Commited to take off) - Rotate (effectively pull the conrtol column back to take off) then V2....Hope that helps
V2 is the minimum safe speed to take off ( ie climb) minimum safe speed will incorporate loss of engine failure loss infact loss of anything, hence minimum SAFE speed. Though thanks for correcting me...i knew what i was on about. ;-)...Others have difficulty keeping up.
Cause if engine number 1 fails u get less thrust from the left side in which makes the plane turn to the left. So the rudder counters that problem by moving to the right.
bird strike test - designed to see if the resulting damage from a bird strike will destroy the engine, if so if the casing will contain the damage
bladeoff test - exact same thing but with an intake blade, in both cases the engine is destroyed, the point is to ensure the casing of the engine contains the explosion and doesnt put any risk to the rest of the aircraft
Yes, but pass what? Most likely they have to pass a test which proves they won't blow up and throw shrapnel through the fuselage. I can't imagine a bird of any size much bigger than a hummingbird passing through an engine without so much as bending a blade. I recently read of a fighter jet which had its engine seize when it ingested a horned lark.
Engines are stress tested like if a bird hits a fan blade and the blade comes out it must keep itself together, unbalanced, until the pilot can land it but in this case the pilot didn't even take off
the blade off test on jet engines are designed to proved the blade won't exit the side of the engine, its not designed to prove it won't destroy the rest of the engine in the process, so if a blade did seperate on this engine, the resulting fire and smoke was probly caused by other remnants of the engine passing through the combustion chamber etc.
On "Modern Marvels" on the History channel. They did a segment on bird strike testing of jet engines. It said in order for the engine to pass, they would run the engine up to speed, then fire a turkey at it. In order to pass it had to both remain intact, running, and have atleast 50% power left, for several mins (I forget exactly how long, but it was a mesured amount of time) before the engine quit all together (stoped running).
Ladies and gentlement we are going .to puntaCana Boom!
Or maybe not... must be air france hahaha
But all kidding aside lucky it was on the ground not in the air.,
Dorisequador 4 months ago
"That must be number one....
I got it on film.
cool."
:D
ThyBiding 9 months ago
ur an idiot its not after burners
Socialactionprojectb 11 months ago
compressor stall...
Corey497 1 year ago
@HeilHitPRO yes the plane abording the take!!
HamburgAirport 1 year ago
"I got on film... ....coOL!" xD
H0rrid0 1 year ago 2
afterburners dumass
gypsykingg 1 year ago
@gypsykingg never in my years of flying have ive seen a dumbass like you not passanger or cargo jet have afterburners this is a compressor stall.
houshidar558 8 months ago
@houshidar558 haha no shit? Just because the engine flamed out does not just mean compressor stall, it could also be FOD. Thanks for taking my comment so seriously though lol
gypsykingg 6 months ago
@gypsykingg no, this is a compressor stall a flame out wont have that gush of flames shooting from the back that's obviously a stall, no one can red a damn comment and think there "Joking">
houshidar558 6 months ago
"im gonna drive this with 3 engines"...... "zomg i have 4 engines!"
MrRoflolmaos 1 year ago
Lol how did the second guy not see the engine almost explode?
TheIndoorFllyer1 1 year ago
"i got it on film"
"COOL!"
thefsxandREALpilot 1 year ago
You got it on film? NO SHIT? LOL
AirForceRabbits 1 year ago
hey
ShermanM36 1 year ago
@ShermanM36 SPAM!!!!! lol
AirForceRabbits 1 year ago
did he abort landing?
badboiant29 1 year ago
@badboiant29 lol why would he take off again if he already on the ground, this is take off
featheredmusic 1 year ago
@badboiant29 Takeoff you mean? If it was an aborted LANDING he would jumped back into the air.
AirForceRabbits 1 year ago
Iberia sucks.....they board service is very very bad and u save only $150 or less flying iberia.....DONT FLY IBERIA
ejzen11 2 years ago
The one thing you never want to hear in an aircraft:
V1 followed by the words "Oh shit"
Excellent reaction by the pilots I may add. seems like they maintained centerline (or damn close to it) the entire time.
putman201 2 years ago
@putman201 airplanes are so technologically advanced that sometimes we tend to overlook what they're designed to do, now the 777, not sure about this 747, but im sure they're some out there like it, have a system on board, where in case of an engine failure on take-off,maintains the course of the aircraft,i.e, centreline, and of course the plane rejects the take-off.
siograeme21 2 years ago
FADEC. Fully Automated Digital Engine Control. Just about all the newer planes have it. You tell the engine how much thrust you want, it does it. However, you cannot change the fact that when an engine blows, you have asymmetrical thrust. ie the left side engine is still producing full thrust and the right is zero. therefore the plane turns in the direction of the inoperative engine. There is no program I know of that overcomes this or physics. And it certainly will not override the pilot.
putman201 2 years ago
Think about it... do I want the machine telling when to abort a takeoff when in certain scenarios before v1 I should continue? I know training says cut before v1 for certain malfunctions rather then risking it but I want the choice to be mine. Not a machines. And incase you are wondering, I am a commercial pilot. The only machine up there to maintain centerline and making decisions to abort take off or continue is the lump of meat manipulating the controls, nothing else.
putman201 2 years ago
lol, well im just a private, but im relaying info that was explained,by a british airways "lump of meat", what he said, is that once the aircraft loses an engine on the takeoff roll, id guess it's the FADEC, but the aircraft maintains it's heading, so taking into consideration, that the autopilot and flight director, already can calculate and readjust for different speeds in flight,weights,c.g's, winds and any other factor that would alter the balance,would it not be possible for the aircraft to
siograeme21 2 years ago
Comment removed
siograeme21 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@putman201 maintain its heading even after an engine loss? if u are able, try to ask around to see what's the possibility of this being true. and with regards to the rejected take-off,i didnt mean to imply that the aircraft stops on its own,this only happens when the pilot retards the throttle on the take-off roll, hence it's the pilot's decision still, if he wants to take-off or abort.
siograeme21 2 years ago
that a scenery you dont want to see if you're on that plane and your seat is next to the left window after the wing..
blackuzco 2 years ago
By the way, engine number 1 is the critical engine on a 747, which means that in case of failure during take-off, provokes the greatest drag and "problems" to the pilot... they were lucky that engine blow was so soon, before V1...
Bird ingestion?
SoulMaker 2 years ago
Aircraft would not have reached V-1 speed which is the point at which pilot much commit to the takeoff rather than abort.
Kentuckyhorse1 2 years ago
yeah, that's the strobe. nothing out of the ordinary.
what is interesting to see is the rudder full deflection to the right to compensate the greater power on the left wing after the blow.
teachermax 2 years ago
any one notice the flash at the back of the plane right before the engine blow out?
spikeymikey1123 2 years ago
wow, look at him kick hard right rudder when that engine went out. That musta yanked so hard left... great reaction time by the pilot
vonjager 2 years ago 31
I think loss of thrust from left side made the plane try to turn left. Had to correct with rudder.
joopasenjoo2 2 years ago
Aborted Take Off
CALanceGokongwei 2 years ago
cool
LOLstoplying 2 years ago
I like how the guy says "cool" right at the end
JeighEigh 2 years ago 7
Pedro let loose his donkey on the runway
peanuts2105 2 years ago 3
Tio joder la mejor aerolinea del mundo ¡ IBERIA tio la virgencita del despegue. No le has puesto florecillas antes de salir al ruedo tio. Ha explotado el motor .
IBERIA shit.
faboledesma 2 years ago
lucky catch nice one!
boeingace1618 2 years ago
wow great shot!
airplanecrazy 2 years ago
bird i think
SoloNetherlands 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG! Did they all die?
doodydude234 2 years ago
No. I saved all of them.
vascularcylinder 2 years ago 2
good thing that happened before v2..
gren240 3 years ago 9
Don't mean to sound silly but what is V2? I know what V1 is
AyDavey21 2 years ago
V2 is the minimum safe take off speed. So a pilots call out would be V1. (Commited to take off) - Rotate (effectively pull the conrtol column back to take off) then V2....Hope that helps
cutekev1 2 years ago
Aaaahhhhh I see thanks for the info,
You learn something new everyday :D
AyDavey21 2 years ago
V2 is the safe climb out speed with engine power loss
bobbj77 2 years ago
V2 is the minimum safe speed to take off ( ie climb) minimum safe speed will incorporate loss of engine failure loss infact loss of anything, hence minimum SAFE speed. Though thanks for correcting me...i knew what i was on about. ;-)...Others have difficulty keeping up.
cutekev1 2 years ago
I know exactly what you mean : - )
bobbj77 2 years ago
Takeoff safety speed. The speed at which the aircraft may safely become airborne with one engine inoperative.
cruxader27 2 years ago
"WAH he blew fire! numbe- number 1. WAT oh yeah he's aborting he's aborting number 1...I got it on film COOOOOOL"
BrendanIsCool 3 years ago 7
auto trim
SgtRaaaa 3 years ago
the rudder turns right automatic
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 3 years ago
No?
dannepanne87 3 years ago
the rudder turns automatic when the engin falls!
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 3 years ago
Of which reasons?
dannepanne87 3 years ago
Cause if engine number 1 fails u get less thrust from the left side in which makes the plane turn to the left. So the rudder counters that problem by moving to the right.
musashi606 3 years ago
This system is called TAC (Thrust Asymmetry Compensation) ?
dannepanne87 3 years ago
yeap correct
musashi606 3 years ago
yes!
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 3 years ago
auto trim
SgtRaaaa 3 years ago
yea
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 3 years ago
What is that called?! Backthrust, no? I mean if the engine is not striked by any FOD.
dannepanne87 3 years ago
Called a surge!
Sterlingjob 3 years ago
Surge hum, so thats the mechanical name for it? I pretty sure that I´ve heard something with "back..."
dannepanne87 3 years ago
Backfireing?
dannepanne87 3 years ago
no. jet engine move from wing then jet engine blade hit something inside cause of too much of RPM
choppergage 3 years ago
or he says burning?
Fourgett 3 years ago
he says "oh yeah, he's aborting"
torquey88 3 years ago
ok his american
Fourgett 3 years ago
what? o yeah its a boering.
he just didint saw it!
Fourgett 3 years ago
camera guy- ..."yeah i got in on film.."
second guy- ..." cool"
oldskoolchevelle 3 years ago
I'd just have named them Beavis and Butthead.
argh1989 3 years ago
bird strike test - designed to see if the resulting damage from a bird strike will destroy the engine, if so if the casing will contain the damage
bladeoff test - exact same thing but with an intake blade, in both cases the engine is destroyed, the point is to ensure the casing of the engine contains the explosion and doesnt put any risk to the rest of the aircraft
thesquisheee 3 years ago
Oh, that's no problem. Just need to adjust the timing a little.
4wheeldrifting 3 years ago
damn cheap gas. Shoulda filled up with premium.
buggar4466 4 years ago 37
LOL
deadlyfalcon89 3 years ago
Foreign object damage. The engine sucked in something it shouldn't have. Most likely it was a bird.
ccoraxfan 4 years ago
it was probably a bird but the engines are bird strike tested they have to pass for those reasons
Blackbirdboys 4 years ago
Yes, but pass what? Most likely they have to pass a test which proves they won't blow up and throw shrapnel through the fuselage. I can't imagine a bird of any size much bigger than a hummingbird passing through an engine without so much as bending a blade. I recently read of a fighter jet which had its engine seize when it ingested a horned lark.
ccoraxfan 4 years ago
Engines are stress tested like if a bird hits a fan blade and the blade comes out it must keep itself together, unbalanced, until the pilot can land it but in this case the pilot didn't even take off
dietcoke3396 4 years ago
the blade off test on jet engines are designed to proved the blade won't exit the side of the engine, its not designed to prove it won't destroy the rest of the engine in the process, so if a blade did seperate on this engine, the resulting fire and smoke was probly caused by other remnants of the engine passing through the combustion chamber etc.
homer090 4 years ago
On "Modern Marvels" on the History channel. They did a segment on bird strike testing of jet engines. It said in order for the engine to pass, they would run the engine up to speed, then fire a turkey at it. In order to pass it had to both remain intact, running, and have atleast 50% power left, for several mins (I forget exactly how long, but it was a mesured amount of time) before the engine quit all together (stoped running).
salemcripple 4 years ago
it was the carburetor..lol
Ikeepitreelz 4 years ago 2
lol :DDD
tucciotucci 4 years ago
wow, i travel to europ every summer, if that happened to me i woulda shit my pants lol
jparis99 4 years ago
I had that happen in mid-air (I actually saw it happen out my window). Very glad to be alive, lol!
nuthinwrongwithpeace 4 years ago
ive tried it too with klm!! its so damn scary
charlivoo 4 years ago
it sucked somethin that wasn't air
uyesu 4 years ago
Get Ure Sht Right Airports, Your Messing With People Lifes. Good Thing It Happend While It Was Grounded
IXBridgmenXI 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it was a bird you stupid fuck
ConditionCritical403 4 years ago
uhh engine stupid fuck
mrtrippy 4 years ago
ehhhhh BLOWD
browik 4 years ago
Compressor stall mostly likely caused that. Also could have been a surge.
DeltaJet757 4 years ago 2
Best on the ground....
VideoJunkei 4 years ago 2
scary !!!!
jjoy69 4 years ago
Pissed off pilots I guess... Now, they has to explain to the wifes (again), why they will be late for supper - Equals no sex for ten days.
;)
Good to safetyroll the camera.
viggenxfiles 4 years ago 2
wow!
trickshot11 4 years ago
POOF!
SmiertSpionem 4 years ago