Graphical sensationalism fails Journalism. What journalists need are raw records raw data and overall raw images to back objectivity of their reports and they should be referenced easily. Investigative are more important than controversial therefore we need graphical investigation and recording instead of graphical sensationalism.
Graphical sensationalism fails Journalism. What journalists need are raw records raw data and overall raw images to back objectivity of their reports and they should be referenced easily. Investigative are more important than controversial therefore we need graphical investigation and recording instead of graphical sensationalism.
beancube2010 5 days ago
冇影像睇鬼咩
ericchow74123 1 year ago
收左幾多錢呀
hollesony 1 year ago
蔡瀾爆粗
ghuhk1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9 up
MrPraybrethrenz 2 years ago
2位果然係香港才子..
講既野一針見血!!
wongyion2001 2 years ago 12
0:29 it's "Harry Potter" not "Harry Porter"~
siusiu143 2 years ago 2
x2 蘋果錯字多!
friggingbomb88 2 years ago 3
蘋果錯字多??
BafflinBook 2 years ago
十卜十卜~
arnoldpoon24 2 years ago 2
2位果然夠堅!!!
milksweets 2 years ago 9
快人快語 將好多偽人比下去 好野
hhadult 2 years ago 35
LMAO
chineserapper 2 years ago 5