Added: 2 years ago
From: NevadaPaleocon
Views: 2,059
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fuc+ you with this crap. I live in Canada and ive never had an issue, England sends doctors to your house for Christ sake. Gimmie a break..The only purpose of these ads in so pharmaceutical companies, congress and it's politicians can profit. Do you Americans really believe this sh+t??

  • what did you guys expect? the liberal media only supports the first amendment when it agrees with them. and being that they're socialist, it's expected.

  • oh yea thats TOTally socialist..

  • it sure is. big gov't does not like critisism. i'm from china. i would know.

  • hah sike all govt does not like critizism...and ur statement about the 1st amendment and agreeing only wen it favors them...thats alot more true for the right wing in the US then the dems

    and im socialist...so i wud know if the dems r or not

  • really? the mainstream media is 90% liberal in the U.S. if the right wing really didn't like free speech, most of the mainstream media would be dead right now. bush had hell thrown his way, and he didn't care. and right now, obama is bickering with fox news (quite possibly the ONLY conservative news station).

    and also, woodrow wilson ( a democrat), made the sedition act, which made it a crime to speak out against ww1. if anything, the democrats hate free speech, not the republicans.

  • hahahahahaaha ur history is WRONG

    90% liberal? ya i wish. the bush administration did complain about msnbc And not only that but they attempted to stump free speech for sum (at least cheney did)

    and woodrow wilson with the sedition act?? LOL that was ADAMS you moron, kinda a century b4

    and no1 *hates* free speech, especially not the democrats. so stop spreading bullshit as if its facts cus its not

  • and the sedition act u were talking about, it wasnt a ban on free speech, it was a warning on anti-american war sentiments (as in pro-german) that it was not allowed to say anything rong about the armed forces of the US

    and btw a truckload of republicans voted for it..since it was "patriotic"

  • so far, i have not seen the bush administation make an official statement against msnbc. however, the obama administration did make an official statement against fox news. the sedition act was a blatant attack on free speech. it was illegal to speak out against the war. if applied today, 90% of the media would be in jail right now.

    why don't you go prove otherwise.

    and from what i heard, none of the republicans voted for the healthcare bill. hell, some dems didn't either.

  • fact is, if bush reacted to critisism the same way obama did, he'd be a very angry person. but, he took that (and worse). and the fact that this commercial was banned is also another proof. so why don't you go take your baseless arguements back to your liberal blogs.

  • i wasnt talking about the healthcare bill... and i dont know if u realize, but CNN, MSNBC, and Fox are privately owned companies, so they have the freedom to do whatever then hell they want; and if its to ban certain ridiculusly stupid (like this one) or competely against their agenda (like the ones fox bans) then they ban them..it isnt the government

    oh and btw, the Patriot Act is the most freedom-killing thing passed by this govt since Adam's sedition act

  • true, true. my point is that msnbc and abc do not seem to like anybody who disagrees with them. fox news is a lot better at this part. i have not seen a conservative on msnbc at all, but i've seen plenty of liberals go onto shows like glenn beck and the o'reilly factor.

    so far, NO ONE has been abused by the patriot act. the ACLU even says so. and besides, obama wants to make the patriot act even MORE intrusive.

  • um yea about that; did u know that on msnbc a conservative has his own show that lasts 3 hours? and that two of the channels most used corespondants are conservatives? did u also know that Fox hasnt had a liberal work for them since last year? or that they interupt/mock any liberal that comes on their show(s) and disagree with them?

    and so far, ALOT of pepl hav been abused by the patriot act, and Obama is agenst it, but cant Do anything about it cus of the CIA and FBI pushing for it to stay

  • true, fox news has not had a liberal WORK for them since last year, but it is still BRINGING liberals onto their shows. sure, it's to make a mockery of them, but hey, i can hear liberal arguements on fox all the time, but never any conservative arguements on msnbc.

    please name me one SPECIFIC example. obama does support extending the patriot act: abcnews go com/Politics/obama-supports-ex­tending-patriot-act/story?id=8­582891

    put dots where the spaces are

  • no i hav definatly seen conservative arguments being laid out and sumtimes agreed with on both MSNBC and CNN; most recent example of this is wen the republican candidate for Cali senate was interveiwed for about 20 minutes by King about 2 hours ago

    and i didnt say that the Obama administration is not backing the renewal of the Patriot Act, im just saying that the president himself is against it BUT has no choice but to support it

  • i've never seen it on msnbc, but you are correct about cnn. cnn is pretty middle, which is why i haven't mentioned them.

    how can he not have a choice? plenty of liberals in high places hate the patriot act. it's not like the CIA or the FBI are above critisism. hell, pelosi critisizes the CIA ALL THE TIME. it's not that he doesn't have a choice, it's that he actually does support the patriot act.

  • oh watch chris matthews and Scarboragh if u want conservative arguments being held fairly

    as for obama; hes the president, he sed himself that he personally is against the Patriot Act, nevertheless his stance

    for example, i am personally strongly against abortion, but i am pro-choice

  • thanks for the recomendation. i'll go check 'em out.

    there's no such thing as "no choice". if obama is truely against the patriot act, then he should try to dismantle it. he's in the best position to do so. it's extremely illogical to say he has no choice. we all have choices. if he really feels that he has "no choice" but to support it, then he doesn't have a spine. that kinda guy is NOT fit to be a leader.

  • nonono u see he's playin it smart...and i restate my example

    i think that abortion is wrong against nature, as most pro-lifers are, but i am pro-choice BECAUSE the consequences of illegalizing it Now are too costly to society then slowly eradicating it thru gradual legislation

  • I think everyone was the right to free speech. I don't think they should have banned this, all though, they had the choice weather or not too. I respect there chose. But I think it's pretty dumb.

  • Not surprised from a baby killer.

  • They want us to know as little about this new healthcare plan as possible.  But hey, it's not THEIR plan is it??? They just want it for us!

  • Pure DISREGARD for Freedom of Speech!  SHAME ON YOU ABC and NBC

  • ABC & NBC are afraid of how much more the people would not want bill HR 3200 if they were to see this. It has been confirmed over and over that it's too costly, it will be rationed.

    And if you want to see some good facts on HR 3200 check out my page, on it I have broke down facts from the bill plus 2 different websites that break down the bill in great detail and will answer anyone's questions.

    Thanks again to NevadaPaleocon

    for posting this video.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more