The information in this video has only taught me, that there is only one god. This one just creates plants that hunt, other than that anyone can be Atheist... not bashig, and neither am I taking sides, just joking. Much respect to all beliefs.
Its silly that people act as though somthing as marvalous as a Cp could only be created at the hands god. If we evolved so can a plant. If ants evolve to have as advanced communiites as they do Im sure a plant can do the same. Go ahead and give my comment a thumbs down . Its just food for thought.
And I see everyone arguing about religion. Everyone has their beliefs and they don't need to convince other people something's real. I don't like the Atheist religion, but you don't see me yelling at Atheists IRL or through chat to respect God instead of Satan. So we call Him, or Her whoever is in our religion, the Creator. Or if no religion, we were all little fishies in the beginning. Agreed? No? Well, I tried. Later.
These types of arguments as proof of God are backwards and unconvincing. Saying "prove this can happen without a god. Well you can't? God must have done it and thus must exist" is not the right way to inform people of the power of God. There is no proof of God and that is why religion is based on faith.
ophel u shut up ok the venus fly trap is a very helpful plant it kills things we dont like like flys spiders and stufe keep thos mean commments to yourself
it's called irreducible complexity dude.. it's not promoting religion, it's promoting design. the fact that design implicates religion is irrelevant. i can give you countless examples of irreducible complexity also (which completely breaks darwin's theory down) the reason people refuse to accept what the evidence suggests, however, comes down to faith.. people either have faith in evolution, or faith in design, but the scientific evidence points to design..
Faith being irrelevant when introduced to logic in most cases that is...
In this case, you're right that it's promoting design, but you're wrong about it not promoting religion. During this series of videos it's using an absence of immediate evidence from here, as an attempt to fill a gaping void in another theory, i.e. any given religion, in this case it's the Muslim faith.
So again while you're correct about the theory of design, you're wrong about the purpose of the video.
hehe,yeah,Behe's mousetrap,i think it had 5 parts,similarly,these traps are more complex,but when it is accepting the Creator,it is not so easy to say "yes"
I didn't come here for an R.E. lesson, I came here to watch carnivorous plants.
ChrisLaCIR 8 months ago
allah propaganda.
your god is better than mine game
retards
sashazindel 1 year ago
The information in this video has only taught me, that there is only one god. This one just creates plants that hunt, other than that anyone can be Atheist... not bashig, and neither am I taking sides, just joking. Much respect to all beliefs.
Nyambui 1 year ago
Its silly that people act as though somthing as marvalous as a Cp could only be created at the hands god. If we evolved so can a plant. If ants evolve to have as advanced communiites as they do Im sure a plant can do the same. Go ahead and give my comment a thumbs down . Its just food for thought.
Killerspider762 2 years ago
I gave you a thumbs up...
Nyambui 1 year ago
Superior creator? LOL. It's evolution.
Nexmofo 2 years ago
i like how they got something from quran. do they believe in it...i hope so :)
PokeHacker2008 2 years ago
the first part is not a venus flytrap
peopleguyhumans 3 years ago
1:56 that's one big daddy plant!
And I see everyone arguing about religion. Everyone has their beliefs and they don't need to convince other people something's real. I don't like the Atheist religion, but you don't see me yelling at Atheists IRL or through chat to respect God instead of Satan. So we call Him, or Her whoever is in our religion, the Creator. Or if no religion, we were all little fishies in the beginning. Agreed? No? Well, I tried. Later.
cuddlez54 3 years ago
These types of arguments as proof of God are backwards and unconvincing. Saying "prove this can happen without a god. Well you can't? God must have done it and thus must exist" is not the right way to inform people of the power of God. There is no proof of God and that is why religion is based on faith.
Elsydeonz 3 years ago
ophel u shut up ok the venus fly trap is a very helpful plant it kills things we dont like like flys spiders and stufe keep thos mean commments to yourself
lightwing5000 3 years ago
lol this is a response to Chris Crocker blink LOL
DunemaulFTW 3 years ago
why? lol!
pinsetter1991 3 years ago
im gonna throw sombodys head in the south african soundo plant
--
Sent from my Helio Ocean
freshboy55 3 years ago
Nobody ever asks why God has nothing better to do than make weird plants for no apparent reason. Pointless design, more like.
OpheliaInRed 3 years ago 2
See Allah has created all of this but yet people still ignore him
DamuEmran 4 years ago
The attempt to promote religion like that, I find hilarious, the footage however, is still amazing. Oh and just a tad creepy. x.x
Th3L0n3r 4 years ago 2
actually it is just an attempt to show the facts
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
it's called irreducible complexity dude.. it's not promoting religion, it's promoting design. the fact that design implicates religion is irrelevant. i can give you countless examples of irreducible complexity also (which completely breaks darwin's theory down) the reason people refuse to accept what the evidence suggests, however, comes down to faith.. people either have faith in evolution, or faith in design, but the scientific evidence points to design..
xinbogger 3 years ago
Faith being irrelevant when introduced to logic in most cases that is...
In this case, you're right that it's promoting design, but you're wrong about it not promoting religion. During this series of videos it's using an absence of immediate evidence from here, as an attempt to fill a gaping void in another theory, i.e. any given religion, in this case it's the Muslim faith.
So again while you're correct about the theory of design, you're wrong about the purpose of the video.
Th3L0n3r 3 years ago
I would like to see a detailed, step-by-step, Darwinian explanation of how the natural selection of random
micromutations produced the elaborate traps of carnivorous plants, like the pitcher plant and the Venus flytrap.
But I suspect there are none, because if there were, the Darwinists would not waste there time on peppered
moths and finch beaks! Like Behe's mousetrap, all these parts are needed to be working together
simultaneously as a coordinated system to catch insects.
oneundergod 4 years ago
hehe,yeah,Behe's mousetrap,i think it had 5 parts,similarly,these traps are more complex,but when it is accepting the Creator,it is not so easy to say "yes"
for some people
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 4 years ago
remarkable
WOGI5M 4 years ago