Yes but apples and oranges. The 1917 is water cooled. As long as fresh water is kept pumping, the barrel is kept within tolerances and there is less heat soak into the receiver. This means parts expand less, lube lasts longer and there is less galling and swelling of/breakage of parts.
@dopefish93 I don't think you can, unless you can find the archive footage somewhere. John Browning fired it for over 45 minutes in a demonstration for the military at the time.
@shermonruler I cannot say with 100% certainty, but it is DEFINITELY among the top tier guns. HK, and FN also have some newer designs that are exceptional. I would contend that if they could do it, there would be video of it for promotional sales/purposes. I have not seen such videos, but that does not mean they don't exist.
LOL. Nice vid. That is a heck of a lot of money you're blasting away there... Besides, are full auto machine guns legal in America? Must be great fun though.
@fresca9990211 It also keeps the Muslims away! Apparently pork is their kryptonite:P Might be a good idea to wrap your gun with bacon when fighting the Taliban..
if a weapon gets hot, it gets inaccurate and weaker. cuz the barrel expants untill its bigger than the bullet, but how does the heat actually slow down the rof and make the gun actually stop (srry for bad english)
@bask185 The heat from firing causes parts to expand and bind. The bolt will expand and get tight in the rails and bolt lug recesses. Heat can also make various parts of the belt mechanism expand and go out of spec. Then there is the issue of the carbon and powder build up.
Eventually they will expand, bind, and get dirty enough to slow down until it is so bad it stops in it's tracks.
I'm no gun expert, but I think the jamming of the gun has to do with a combination of things. Most likely overheating of the barrel and the moving parts plays a big part in this has heat expansion becomes an issue the longer sustained fire is continued. Not to mention residues from the combustion of the propellants and stuff gumming up the pipes and stuff. Correct me if I'm wrong, as said I'm no expert.
Damn that thing had to be practically glowing red after all that. Would have loved to of be
You can make the belts any size you want from 2 rounds to 15000. Unlike some other guns that run belts where the links are ALWAYS connected in 25, 50, 100 , or 250 round segments, M60 links are individual. That's why you saw them piling up to the side rather than coiling like a continuous belt.
Not only did he waste a perfectly good barrel he wasted a perfectly M60E4. the firing pin has got be flat by the end and the feeder would be destroyed the barrel and gas piston would be melted and that bolt would be shaken loose and all the soot from the burnt powder would be all over the inside whey would have to replace all the parts...
This was a torture test. It was by no means a waste of resources. Every gun ever used by anyone that matters was first subjected to induced failure tests like this, to get an idea of it's durability and limits. These guys just happened to record it and put it on youtube.
Of course he ruined a perfectly good barrel, and chucked over 1000 rounds of .308 into a pile of dirt. But it was necessary to see how much the gun could take before it failed.
The cyclic rate of fire of the M60 is 550 rpm, not 450. As for the poster who sugested taking the human operator out of it and using a stand and chrono, exactly what point would that serve on a durability test? Belted 7.62 ammo is not consistent in terms of bullet weights and charges anyway. This is intentional so the cone of fire is wider, thus allowing for a larger "beaten zone". As for this vs the M240, the M240 is still superior to the M60.
i know with taxes and alot of background checks you can get class 3 weapons like uzi ak47 ect but can you get liight /heavy machine guns like m60 m429 and browning .5 cal
@Last1Left2324 they cost an arm leg and your first born child tho haha. because the civilian clientel is so limited making demand low they are pricey. I looked at getting my dad an automatic weapon he used to tote an M60 as an air force SP but they are like 12k-15k and up.
1) On what round number did it fail? And was this test repeated for statistical significance?
2) What was the actual failure mechanism?
3) What were the effects on rate or fire, muzzle velocity and accuracy? I wish they had used a test stand instead of a human operator and a chronograph and some scoring system to get this data.
Its comforting to know that your gun can continuously fire more rounds that you can physically carry. Why do we need the Mk48 again? Or the M240 for that matter...
Actually, it is still in use, just not as a general issue weapon. It is used for more specialized roles that the M240 cannot fill as well/easily such as MOUT or special forces OPS where a heavier firepower is needed but is a lighter smaller package.
I humped an M60 around for a while, she worked great. The key is that you need to literaly dump CLP in the weapon on all the main components and moving parts. As long as she has a hell load of CLP, she'll work just fine. The link pull weight is remarkable as well, the paws can pull in up to about 150 rounds hanging off the weapon. My favorite part is that the weapon is so balanced that it doesn't feel like it weighs as much as it does, it was made to be carried on the move.
This is a light machine gun because it is so much more mobile than heavy machine guns: like the .50cal machine gun, you can't carry it at all alone, it could take 2-3 people to carry the weapon itself, and 2-3 more people to carry extra ammunition and the bi or tripod.
MG42 and Browning M1919 would be more classified as GPMG (General Purpose Machine Gun) also called MMG (Medium Machine Gun) as they come between an LMG and an HMG. A GPMG is more of what a M60 would be too. Some people just don't consider GPMG a true category, in which case they should be bumped down to LMG status cause their power, range, and penetration dosen't come close to a real HMG. P.S. the Browning is chambered in .30-06 not .30-30 (with some modern versions in 7.62 NATO)
You're right about the browning being chambered for .30-06. But The MG42 was and still is classified under a WWII weapons catalog as an HMG. Granted their power doesn't even come close to a .50BMG, But none the less they were classified as it. What truly defines a HMG in the U.S. Army Dept. of Intel(according to my AIT handbook) And HMG is any Machine Gun that requires a crew to carry, And handle. Now the M60 is free of this category, But the MG42, And M1919 are not.
Hm. I see what your saying. Weapons like that were categorized differently back then and the Department of Intel has their own way of classifying things. But anyways we were talking about the M60 and now we're off on the weapons of WWII, ha.
Dude it isn't the us government doing this test it is the weapons manufacturer US ordanance...So no non of that is payed for by you unless you have baught somthing from US Ordanance
Nice. When I was about 11, I went to a navy days event and they had some of the equipment on show. I remember picking up an AK-47 (damn it felt heavy), and I think the MP5 Was there. I also cocked and dry-fired a huge gun. I later found out that it was one of our GPMGs (General Purpose Machine Gun), looked a lot like the M604E. I also remember not being able to cock it withoug the help of a Marine.
Not a problem for the PKM...
Lemaure44 1 week ago
This is the best gun in BF3
AlexGMJ92 3 weeks ago
Ready for the zombie apocalypse!
syanide801 1 month ago
hmm 1600 7.62x54 nato(i think). so thats where our tax dollars keep going
morgan123476 1 month ago
@morgan123476 would you rather they not tested their weapons?.....
JAllenAustralia 1 month ago
@morgan123476 It fires 7.62x51. not 7.62x54, that's the rimmed cartridge.
OAXM202 1 month ago
raatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat
TKSparten117 2 months ago
Shooter "I have to pee.."
LambosRBeast 3 months ago
I hope ya'll gave that fellow some ear protection.
11202 3 months ago
The shooter's shoulder must have been in pain after this test
sonnytenedo 3 months ago
That doesn't sound like rambo.
brogin 3 months ago
Impressive. The M60E4/MK43 is my favorite weapon... hell if I could own only one gun it would be that. I'd love to at least fire one.
boredgunner 4 months ago
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatatatatatatatatatatatat lol
omega79009 5 months ago
Anyone want some 7.62 brass for reloads? lol
TheHawkeye20 6 months ago
didja hit it
InevitableResistance 6 months ago
This guy can be my support gunner any day!
LeeJonB 6 months ago
Not quite as amazing as the M1917 45 minute test, but still cool! Looks like they've patched alot of the jamming issues.
TaZ101SAGA 7 months ago
@TaZ101SAGA
Yes but apples and oranges. The 1917 is water cooled. As long as fresh water is kept pumping, the barrel is kept within tolerances and there is less heat soak into the receiver. This means parts expand less, lube lasts longer and there is less galling and swelling of/breakage of parts.
sorryociffer 7 months ago 6
@TaZ101SAGA were can i find a video of the test with the m1917?
dopefish93 4 months ago
@dopefish93 I don't think you can, unless you can find the archive footage somewhere. John Browning fired it for over 45 minutes in a demonstration for the military at the time.
TaZ101SAGA 4 months ago
and now touch the barrel
pascal81768 7 months ago
@pascal81768 Challange accepted...
BountyHunter313 4 months ago 3
naicee
pascal81768 7 months ago
Pig just plain works.
jimhale777 7 months ago
probably felt the recoil in his sleep too.
mandaloin 7 months ago
rambo would love a belt that long
veilsidefun 8 months ago
Whatever he was shooting at...is dead now.
karkos71 8 months ago
a LOT of bulits
juldino 8 months ago
i think whtever was at the other side of tht barrel was dead by now..
megotsawii 8 months ago
hahah look at the stack of links :P
sgcsharvey 8 months ago
1400 rounds of 7.62... thats at least $900 down the drain
babyeatsdingos 8 months ago
how many rounds did it shoot?
shermonruler 9 months ago
@shermonruler 1600 in the belt. It went ABOUT 1400rds straight...
sorryociffer 9 months ago
@sorryociffer thats pretty good do you know if it is the best as of now?(for an lmg)
shermonruler 9 months ago
@shermonruler I cannot say with 100% certainty, but it is DEFINITELY among the top tier guns. HK, and FN also have some newer designs that are exceptional. I would contend that if they could do it, there would be video of it for promotional sales/purposes. I have not seen such videos, but that does not mean they don't exist.
sorryociffer 9 months ago
how many rounds?
shermonruler 9 months ago
holy crap
fenixans 9 months ago
that noise is going to be stuck in my head for a while
GenerationMine 9 months ago 3
@GenerationMine Yes, it is quite monotonousness.
sorryociffer 9 months ago
Now thats a torture test
TheCivilianSoldier 10 months ago
LOL. Nice vid. That is a heck of a lot of money you're blasting away there... Besides, are full auto machine guns legal in America? Must be great fun though.
hgintern 10 months ago
HOOAH!!!!
vasilikosolov 11 months ago
baby its a ALL NIGHT LONG
(shootout)
Flea21xy 1 year ago
1: Overheat Barrel.
2: Wrap Bacon around it.
3: ???
4: Profit!!!
fresca9990211 1 year ago 23
@fresca9990211 It also keeps the Muslims away! Apparently pork is their kryptonite:P Might be a good idea to wrap your gun with bacon when fighting the Taliban..
evildeathmonkey1 2 months ago
@fresca9990211 they already made a gun for that.. its called the m3 grease gun..
ok ok bad joke, =P but so was his =P
178thbattlegroup 4 weeks ago
i want his job!!
himmler251 1 year ago
I have run maybe 200 rds semi through an AK47 and the heat is unbareable
jrod238 1 year ago
wtf didnt you recharge and keep firing
suckyalaterhead 1 year ago
This guy must be deaf...
Soap752 1 year ago
if a weapon gets hot, it gets inaccurate and weaker. cuz the barrel expants untill its bigger than the bullet, but how does the heat actually slow down the rof and make the gun actually stop (srry for bad english)
bask185 1 year ago
@bask185 The heat from firing causes parts to expand and bind. The bolt will expand and get tight in the rails and bolt lug recesses. Heat can also make various parts of the belt mechanism expand and go out of spec. Then there is the issue of the carbon and powder build up.
Eventually they will expand, bind, and get dirty enough to slow down until it is so bad it stops in it's tracks.
sorryociffer 1 year ago
dont leave bad comments i now the owner and mostly every body there that is were my dad works hi rob brown
snoops1997 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dont leave bad comments i know the owner and mostly every bodie there my dad works there hi rob brown
snoops1997 1 year ago
dont leave bad comments i know the owner and mostly every bodie there my dad works there hi rob brown
snoops1997 1 year ago
lol wtf is the barrel ceramic? this is impressive haha! bet his shoulder got a lil tingley
awsomeshot 1 year ago
@awsomeshot
Stellite lined. Good shit.
sorryociffer 1 year ago
@sorryociffer should be the m60-FTW edition
awsomeshot 1 year ago
Hmm.... Somehow, I don't think that M60 is going to pass Marine Corps inspection...
Z0MBIEStheyN0MBIES 1 year ago
33000 viewer!!!!!!!
soverato3 1 year ago
that one belt can move a lot of units forward. lol
baker70romeo 1 year ago
THAT has to be a sore shoulder!
2URBO2 1 year ago
why is the sound of the gun different?
at the beginning it was a totaly different sound to when it was around 3 minutes
SPAZZY1912 1 year ago
I'm no gun expert, but I think the jamming of the gun has to do with a combination of things. Most likely overheating of the barrel and the moving parts plays a big part in this has heat expansion becomes an issue the longer sustained fire is continued. Not to mention residues from the combustion of the propellants and stuff gumming up the pipes and stuff. Correct me if I'm wrong, as said I'm no expert.
Damn that thing had to be practically glowing red after all that. Would have loved to of be
Arphalia 1 year ago
I would clean that gun if i could do this
ANGRYTACP 1 year ago
holy shit...
arizonan800 1 year ago
More like a torture test for the person shooting the weapon.
sypros 1 year ago 15
I'm surprised rounds weren't cooking off as they entered the chamber! Why did it fail? Did it just get too dirty?
sykop8ntballer 1 year ago
one of the best jobs in the world, if not THE best
crbassassin 1 year ago
wow how much ammunition spent XD
599manuel 1 year ago
i want this job
himmler251 1 year ago
get some bacon on that barrel :)
GUNNER0113 1 year ago
SUPPRESSIVE FIRE!!!!!
LilATL94 1 year ago
Pity the poor fella. They should have a mechanized remote trigger control.
blackapple89er 1 year ago
This is how we mow down insurgents.
LilATL94 1 year ago
This is how I hunt deer.
303Jeff 1 year ago
YEAH SUCK ON THAT U DAMN KOREANS!!!!
sguberdude 1 year ago
It seems like the firing rate is getting lower as the barrel disintegrates.
calvinnewspaper 1 year ago
i wonder how hot that barrel must be at the end of the test..
Madsacre92 1 year ago
Ima M60E4. Om nom nom nom all your ammo!
flaktower 1 year ago
shooters probably a little tired after that lol
DDFcash 1 year ago
Mowin down some north koreans :)
Kaos582 1 year ago
oh fuck ! !
trholy25 1 year ago
damn thats bad ass . very nice lmg
isaiahman1234567 1 year ago
sick video man!
fappingfishstick 1 year ago
How much was that ammunition you just wasted?
Blaxot 1 year ago
a lot of money! woooooooooooo
save it for the reLovetion
cyrs1 1 year ago
damn ill bet his shoulder fuckin hurts
bowlofrice8 1 year ago
God I love the M60
cauberallies 2 years ago
dmmmmmmmmmmm is deam good
efren2481 2 years ago
What's the black thing ejecting from the gun?
TheDarkNobleOne 2 years ago
thats the banding thats holding the bullets together on the belt feed
bloodomen81 2 years ago
the links, i was confuzed at first too.
redneckdude4 1 year ago
@TheDarkNobleOne brass links
bladez0rz23 1 year ago
that barrel was probably heating up like a fat man walking up stairs.
coolgun789 2 years ago
didnt no they made belts that big
sebbysam444 2 years ago 2
@sebbysam444
You can make the belts any size you want from 2 rounds to 15000. Unlike some other guns that run belts where the links are ALWAYS connected in 25, 50, 100 , or 250 round segments, M60 links are individual. That's why you saw them piling up to the side rather than coiling like a continuous belt.
sorryociffer 2 years ago 4
@sorryociffer You can get solid links that connect also, you just have to skip a round at the link.
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
Comment removed
CoreitoTheGreat 1 year ago
wow there is a block of led in the hillside somewhere
shock312 2 years ago 3
tatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatata......................
MrKukkeliskuu 2 years ago
I want to see the Target.
Barrett50caliber 2 years ago
He's using the Bandolier perk :)
Luckymongoose27 2 years ago
Great! That's a real test. That's a fact. No bla bla...
2002nickname 2 years ago
Not only did he waste a perfectly good barrel he wasted a perfectly M60E4. the firing pin has got be flat by the end and the feeder would be destroyed the barrel and gas piston would be melted and that bolt would be shaken loose and all the soot from the burnt powder would be all over the inside whey would have to replace all the parts...
sergeant505 2 years ago
@sergeant505 Its called a torture test for a reason bud.
plcains 2 years ago 8
Its like crashing a new car with dummies in it....to see how it holds up.
facmptr 1 year ago
He just ruined a perfectly good barrel by doing this. What a waste of resources !
1962SatanTookOver2 2 years ago
One c130 going to Iraq carries 25 million rounds of 5.56. This guy really didn't use that many resources at all.
ken702 2 years ago
This is not a 5.56x45mm, but a 7.62x51mm NATO 147 grains Full-metal jacket instead of the puny 55 grains or 62 grains.
1962SatanTookOver2 2 years ago
I'm perfectly aware of all of that. I was just trying to give you a basic idea of how much bullets/resources that are really used in the world.
ken702 2 years ago
@1962SatanTookOver2
This was a torture test. It was by no means a waste of resources. Every gun ever used by anyone that matters was first subjected to induced failure tests like this, to get an idea of it's durability and limits. These guys just happened to record it and put it on youtube.
Of course he ruined a perfectly good barrel, and chucked over 1000 rounds of .308 into a pile of dirt. But it was necessary to see how much the gun could take before it failed.
cauberallies 2 years ago 2
damn thats alot of 7.62 cost too much for that shit lol
BHARMS2 2 years ago 4
sounded like a broken cd
dumfart21 2 years ago
two things, whats the target look like when he's done firing, and who's the poor bastard that's going to clean that gun.
shem1911 2 years ago 14
@shem1911 what target?lol and it sucks to be the guy that cleans it
branflakes55 1 year ago
@shem1911 Thats why they put steel wire brushes in cleaning kits lol
polishpio0neer1 8 months ago
holy crap its going to over heat and turn red lol
mrjohnny97 2 years ago
The cyclic rate of fire of the M60 is 550 rpm, not 450. As for the poster who sugested taking the human operator out of it and using a stand and chrono, exactly what point would that serve on a durability test? Belted 7.62 ammo is not consistent in terms of bullet weights and charges anyway. This is intentional so the cone of fire is wider, thus allowing for a larger "beaten zone". As for this vs the M240, the M240 is still superior to the M60.
runawaygun762 2 years ago
As long as the 240 is mounted. The M240B is heavy, even for a 7.62 machine gun. The M60 is lighter at least.
mastertanker001 2 years ago
dam with all that ammo to waste i would of at least tried to have some fun
aszilagyi4292 2 years ago 2
you dont think that would be fun??
GRIZZLYMINTALLDAY 2 years ago
yea true but i think all its ammo would have blew up a tank
Gertibug 2 years ago
dude your noot even shooting it
iamcoldsodmg 2 years ago
all this needs is some door gunner music
BurroBurrito1 2 years ago
It fired about 1050 rounds before failing.
lwilde 2 years ago
how can you tell? or your just makin a number up for jokes?
ChuckAllaway 2 years ago
I never joke about MGs I have used.
That MG fires at a nominal rate of about 450rpm. It fired for 2 minutes and 39 seconds. Do the math. You do know how...right?
My rough estimate also correlates pretty well with the number of rounds he has remaining.
lwilde 2 years ago
come on who fires that many rounds at once...
BurroBurrito1 2 years ago
yes but did you take into consideration the slowdown from heat?
siralexu 2 years ago
i know with taxes and alot of background checks you can get class 3 weapons like uzi ak47 ect but can you get liight /heavy machine guns like m60 m429 and browning .5 cal
Last1Left2324 2 years ago
Yes. You can buy a howitzer if you have the money and it is a pre-86.
sorryociffer 2 years ago
can you buy the ammo (artillarary shells)
Last1Left2324 2 years ago
@Last1Left2324 they cost an arm leg and your first born child tho haha. because the civilian clientel is so limited making demand low they are pricey. I looked at getting my dad an automatic weapon he used to tote an M60 as an air force SP but they are like 12k-15k and up.
awsomeshot 1 year ago
You could hear its rhythm change towards the end. Impressive though.
Egg573 2 years ago
i like this thing but the iron sights are horrible
tecna64 2 years ago
I'd like to know:
1) On what round number did it fail? And was this test repeated for statistical significance?
2) What was the actual failure mechanism?
3) What were the effects on rate or fire, muzzle velocity and accuracy? I wish they had used a test stand instead of a human operator and a chronograph and some scoring system to get this data.
rocket881 2 years ago
thats a hell of a lot of rounds. damn !!!!
MrFeliu 2 years ago
"Hey Billy, wanna earn a buck? Go over touch that barrel, just for a second."
*Gets popcorn*
slugger449 2 years ago
That's still very good.
tiecuando 2 years ago
that is a great suppressed fire.
Soap752 2 years ago
Its comforting to know that your gun can continuously fire more rounds that you can physically carry. Why do we need the Mk48 again? Or the M240 for that matter...
CoreitoTheGreat 2 years ago
the navy still uses it..i just qual'd with em last week
munch11111 2 years ago
They need to bring this thing back.
D0ublezer0x 2 years ago
Actually, it is still in use, just not as a general issue weapon. It is used for more specialized roles that the M240 cannot fill as well/easily such as MOUT or special forces OPS where a heavier firepower is needed but is a lighter smaller package.
sorryociffer 2 years ago 5
@sorryociffer do you mean the m249, or do you really mean the m240?
jtrebuchon57 1 year ago
@jtrebuchon57
In regards to what?
sorryociffer 1 year ago
@sorryociffer you said specialized roles that the m240 cannot fill. I was wondering wether u meant m249 or m240.
jtrebuchon57 1 year ago
@D0ublezer0x
I humped an M60 around for a while, she worked great. The key is that you need to literaly dump CLP in the weapon on all the main components and moving parts. As long as she has a hell load of CLP, she'll work just fine. The link pull weight is remarkable as well, the paws can pull in up to about 150 rounds hanging off the weapon. My favorite part is that the weapon is so balanced that it doesn't feel like it weighs as much as it does, it was made to be carried on the move.
Mr2ndAmendment 1 year ago
@Mr2ndAmendment
was this before or after the redesigns?
D0ublezer0x 1 year ago
Respect USA!
BosnaPatriot 2 years ago
Im not sure half these people even know what the 7.62 nato is......Its a .308 everybody...
niko911 2 years ago
that hot barrel would be a dangerous melee weapon lol
1airplane21 2 years ago
This is a light machine gun because it is so much more mobile than heavy machine guns: like the .50cal machine gun, you can't carry it at all alone, it could take 2-3 people to carry the weapon itself, and 2-3 more people to carry extra ammunition and the bi or tripod.
cheesebobjoe 2 years ago
wow,this isn't a LMG(light machines gun),this is a HMG(heavy machines gun),realy increble...
Soap752 2 years ago
No, its an LMG.
AstonMartinFan 2 years ago
No he's right. Light Machine Guns use a lower caliber. The M60 uses the 7.62 NATO. Makes it an HMG.
aphsknight74 2 years ago
HMG's are machine guns that use .50BMG (12.7x99mm) or larger. The M60 isn't an HMG. Just sayin :)
FiveSevenFiveSeven 2 years ago
Actually, The MG42 was clearly classified as an HMG, As was the Browning .30-30. Neither of those fire a .50BMG.
aphsknight74 2 years ago
MG42 and Browning M1919 would be more classified as GPMG (General Purpose Machine Gun) also called MMG (Medium Machine Gun) as they come between an LMG and an HMG. A GPMG is more of what a M60 would be too. Some people just don't consider GPMG a true category, in which case they should be bumped down to LMG status cause their power, range, and penetration dosen't come close to a real HMG. P.S. the Browning is chambered in .30-06 not .30-30 (with some modern versions in 7.62 NATO)
FiveSevenFiveSeven 2 years ago
You're right about the browning being chambered for .30-06. But The MG42 was and still is classified under a WWII weapons catalog as an HMG. Granted their power doesn't even come close to a .50BMG, But none the less they were classified as it. What truly defines a HMG in the U.S. Army Dept. of Intel(according to my AIT handbook) And HMG is any Machine Gun that requires a crew to carry, And handle. Now the M60 is free of this category, But the MG42, And M1919 are not.
aphsknight74 2 years ago
Hm. I see what your saying. Weapons like that were categorized differently back then and the Department of Intel has their own way of classifying things. But anyways we were talking about the M60 and now we're off on the weapons of WWII, ha.
FiveSevenFiveSeven 2 years ago
Well, Even by the Ordnance division classifies the M60 as an LMG because it's man portable, So I guess this conversation was pointless.XD
aphsknight74 2 years ago
Heh, guess so.
FiveSevenFiveSeven 2 years ago
Oh well.
aphsknight74 2 years ago
Is it me or did it slow down?
Zyoher 2 years ago
Yes it did. why is explained in comments further down.
sorryociffer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think i see my taxes being shot uselessly down a range!
disturbedR0x 2 years ago
Dude it isn't the us government doing this test it is the weapons manufacturer US ordanance...So no non of that is payed for by you unless you have baught somthing from US Ordanance
ghdgdgr 2 years ago
thats a good way to get the battalion armourer to sneak into your room at night and cut your throat lol
madmatt454 2 years ago
i noticed the fire rate to slow a little at about 2:15
T3hbassmasta 2 years ago
Nice. When I was about 11, I went to a navy days event and they had some of the equipment on show. I remember picking up an AK-47 (damn it felt heavy), and I think the MP5 Was there. I also cocked and dry-fired a huge gun. I later found out that it was one of our GPMGs (General Purpose Machine Gun), looked a lot like the M604E. I also remember not being able to cock it withoug the help of a Marine.
mastermalpass 2 years ago
A round that entertains someone is a round well spent
xGothimox 2 years ago
why did'nt you touch the barrel
YoungEagle08 2 years ago
lool the costs of the wasted bullets would be pretty high. i guess..
vuurgerben99 2 years ago