Of what value is it to look for identity, if you have not evolved passed a foul mouthed neanderthal? May the most high free the Black people from ignorance., so sad.
This "Most High" invention is largely why Black people are in the state we're in. Before we adopted the lower theologies of primitive shepherds we were in the forefront of the known world. But not all of us are under the yolk of Jewish fables. And we are not the neanderthals. But we have a bad habit of embracing neanderthals and their myths.
@Iannes33 Get this. I will soon blow your mind. The lie is deeper than you thought. Contact me tonight, as I am saving the evidence. The deceit is great. You are lucky to contact me at this time. I will free you, or rather the most high will. Everyone is wrong. I mean "everyone," and i will prove it.
Black people are slaves of mind and spirit. They are beautiful, but they cannot escape their own slavery. Why waste time listening to some foul mouthed person uttering imbecilities. How hopeless is the black man?
Even the Muslims believe in Moses .. Called MUSA .. so he is a myth? It like 2 groups of different people and believes against your ideology!
If the Jewish people are encouraging to build and use this idols ..why do their laws state to brake them? And why did their ancestors like David destoyed them!
And about your smart question... ain't you showing (in your video of shame) pictures of what the bible state and describe as IDOLS or prostitutes? and aren't you stating that you are following 1!
Islam and Christianity are both Abrahamic religions that grew out of Judaism. So it means nothing when you say "even" Muslims believe in Moses trying to suggest that this was some kind of independent conclusion. Of course they believe in Moses. They're all based on the same Abrahamic myths. And like I already said, the stance on idols is different at different times. That's why Jewsih law says break them...except when they don't.
Dear friend i can see your really smart, so smart that you where not thinking out of the box! Soo i have a question for you.. What happen to the golden calf in the time of Moses? Wasn't it destroyed? ANd like you read THE BIBLE so good! Ain't it forbidded to worship Idols .. man made dolls from stone or whats eva they call saints or gods? And doesn't the bible state in the new and old testament ... that they were destroyed!!!!
Even whole cities burned down and everybody killed!!! BUT after all people like you and your followers went back to build them and follow this stone and man made prostitutes .... so they can keep earning money and sell their souls!
If you draw something or mold something out of earth.. and later you decide to destroy it.. can someone tell you not to destroy it? I think not because its your creation! not even the creation can speak up to you and say something! SOO Who are you to speak up and open your month and tell THE ALMIGTHY what to do! Even calling HIM names!
Moral friend their is no morality cause your nothing else then a puppet .. a slave! And yes they feel but who cares, if He can replace it by a 1000 whenever He wants! Like a prisoner in the joint that thinks he's the big man but at the same time the state controls him and if he misbehave he gets electrocuted... and that happens daily in your moral world! And Yeah real intelligent, like a fool screaming to a officer or executioner and calling him names, not knowing the hell thats waiting him.
The sentient person being killed by your psychotic god, for one.
+"And Yeah real intelligent, like a fool screaming to a officer or executioner and calling him names, not knowing the hell thats waiting him."+
Fortunately, your god doesn't actually exist so I can call him whatever names I want without consequence. But if he did exist, he would be an indefensibly evil man unworthy of praise or worship.
The Exodus is a mythical event and Moses is a fictional character. So no, there was no golden calf of Yahweh that was destroyed. And if you read your Bible you'll see that whether idols are forbidden depends on which book you read. At various periods of Jewish mythology the making of idols is encouraged(see Judges 17:3 in particular). But help me out here. What do idols have to do with this video?
isnt that horus he ain't my god! how is horus ur god and the elites worships horus and other gods. beside i think here's where we got confused we worshipped their gods thats why we went into slavery. fuk egeyption worship when egyption worship got us in this mess. when we dicover our history then we may find that we are of him and we must put the other manipulated images away. he's in us! when we wake up we will finally begin to see this.
Are you a Hebrew Israelite? Ignore that earlier comment if you're not. Anyway, the elites "worship" Horus because they took him from you. Some of us are conscious enough to take him back, and some of us don't know any better so we worship the mentally insane god of the Bible the elites gave us instead to destroy us. Who is the "him" you're speaking of when you say "we are of him"?
A lot of the research done is actually pretty well rounded. I don't know where the hell you are getting yours from. But if you were honestly wanting to find answers and not trouble you would know this already. Do some research and stop playing around.
The way some of these brothers are acting proves they are Israel, they find out who they are and go right back to doing the same crap that got them into slavery to begin with.
Jesus serves 2 purposes in the system of white supremacy. The first purpose is to make you a person that will not fight for your rights. The second is to make you ashamed to ask whites to help you fight for your right, because you see the crucifixion of Jesus in their intervention. So, we can go on and on about this, it also serves as a illustration to whites, not to be soft hearted or you will get crucified.
This how unlearn you are you don't even know Hebrew , LOL for you to even say the name Yahawashi looks Chinese is funny in your ignorance. Egyptology makes a nigger stupid. ROFL.
Second of all it was Abraham who taught these heathen Hamites arithmetic and astrology.
If you think "Yahawashi" is Hebrew, then it's safe to say that you don't know Hebrew either. And if you don't think "Yahawashi" looks Japanese, then you must not know what Japanese words look like. That's not surprising, since judging by that ridiculous Abraham comment you probably don't know much of anything other than what your cult leader mistaught you.
So I guess you believe the Egyptians were the first with everything although other kingdoms pre-dates Egyptian kingdom. Astrology came from the Chaldean which Abraham left from.
It doesn't matter whether there were other kingdoms that came before Egypt or not. What matters is that Egypt had already developed their math and sciences before your Jewish folk hero Abraham would have even been born. Aside from that obvious flaw in your claim, the Black civilizations were much more advanced than the lowly Hebrews. You can't teach your superiors.
Iannes33, so I guess according to you comment above the so called Negroes and Hispanics will never be able to teach or rule over white people because white people civilization was the first to come up with nuclear power and the first to come up with aircrafts that can go the speed of sound, LOL.
How is Moses lying ?, LOL when he was the one who written the first five books, It's like saying If I saying King Tut believe in Monotheism and then you write what I said in his full name Nebkheperure Tutankhamun does that make it a lie or make you a liar because you spell his name in his original form.
They say King Tut all the time but there is a full name written in many books. God meaning Power, Elohiem meaning The power and the Lord means the Power but in full it's YAHAWAH.
If you were quoting a conversation about King Tutankhamen and wherever his name was used you replaced it with "Bob", you'd be misquoting this conversation. And if someone named a city "Tutankhamenu" after Tutankhamen, and you write that the name of the city was "Bobville", you'd be lying. That is not the name of the city. It's not even a transliterary equivalent.
Bob is not a sir name of Tutanhamen but king Tut is and term widely used. Unless if his name was Robert and I used the name Bob or Rob for sure it doesnot differ from the name Robert.
If I use the name almighty or Creator or The Lord then how is that misquoting something when even in your ignorance you would know who I'm talking about and referring to.
Same as Cassius Clay is on record at one time but now the name on record is Muhammed Ali. CHECK MATE!!!!! :D
@shaparnapash Saying Almighty or Creator is not the same as saying Yahweh. Creator and Almighty are titles that can refer to many gods. If you said Creator, I would associate that with Amun long before a desert god like Yahweh. Nor is Elohim the same word function as Yahweh. There were many Elohim/gods. That's why Moses had to ask Yahweh for his name. To know which of the Elohim he was talking to. (cont'd)
I'm going to explain this one last time. Changing a proper name with an entirely different word is a misquote and false. If you name a city Clayville after Cassius, Cassius later changing his name to Ali doesn't change the name of the city. Abraham named the city Yahweh-yireh because he knew Yahweh's name. It's not a name Moses wrote in later because places names don't change like that. So if you're saying Moses made that name up himself, you're making him and the Bible false.
Yes, Moses change it because it was referred to as Yahawah.
No one said Moses made the name up that's what you are implying. What I'm saying is that Moses and the elder wrote the first five books according to how the Lord wanted it written. The first five books was not written by Abraham, whom he did not know the name of Yahawah but the writers of the first five books at the time of the construction of the first books did know the name of Yahawah. It's so simple to understand this.
Genesis 22:14 - And Abraham called the name of that place Yahweh-yireh: AS IT IS SAID TO THIS DAY, In the mount of Yahweh it shall be seen.
--
The verse says that Yahweh-yireh is the same name today as what Abraham originally named it. After the name of "Yahweh". Like I said, I'm not going to keep explaining this to you. You've just been exposed to a Bible mistake and obviously you're a little distraught about it. Come back later after you've had time to process this new information.
Hold up you said putting idols on you page is just the same as putting your child's picture in your wallet. Negroes please , an IDOL doesn't have life and breath in them contrary to a child does.
1st Cor12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. 12:2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, Carried (like a sucker) away unto these DUMB idols, even as ye were led,
LOL, I saw your gods on your page, animal heads with a man's body , LMAO. You so carnal that you need something tangible to believe in.
Tell me one thing that the Africans did for Negroes in America besides the Africans rounding us up and selling us to the white man. Tell the people what have these Africa done for us , at least the Hebrew Israelites are the only group of men that is down for us. The Arabs , the Africans , the Asians can care less about us .
You're so carnal you actually think that's a literal man with the literal head of a literal animal. Damn. That White man's religion has beat the spirituality right out of you and left you "dead".
An Idol doesnot have life in it nor can it speak but a child is a life breathing human being . Do you see the difference? An Idol is something which a man makes which is nothing but an molten image of a four legged beast which has no life and child is something the creator has created which has life
An Idol has no life in it , its a molten image of a four legged beast , just as crackers have the dumb cross of a white jesus still both is an idol of foolishness. A child has a life and was created by the creator and an idol is created by a fool to be admired.
And you whole concept of Egyptology comes out from a cracker by the name of Gerald Massey from England. Not to mention Manetho who was a Greek which is another cracker by race.
Rather than going every which way and posting 16 different messages, try sticking to your original point which I've corrected you on: the prophets knowing Yahweh's name. I'm not going to bother with the other foolishness you're typing like Massey and whatnot. You don't even know your own Bible, so you're certainly not fit to argue about higher concepts like African spirituality or Egyptian history.
Who wrote the first five books Abraham or Moses? like is said before it was Moses who put the original name in the bible. If you did your homework you would understand that it's called the first five books of Moses but each book is written under different name , gotcha!:D
The Nile was not the start of the first civilization , how stupid and unlearn can you be the first known civilization was after the flood was the same region that the garden was at which was not the Nile.
Genesis 10:10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.
Africa comes from the name of a white man . Do your research kid.
notice that this video has a Beanie Siegel soundtrack. Motherfucking garbage shit that the white man approves of. Sell your crack, bust yo gat
Fuck you muthafucka-- whoever posted this bullshit. The white man hides and destroys all the fuck'n records. May the most High either "wake u up" or kill yo punKKK ass
BS. The White man has tried for centuries to substanciate his Bible. His archaeologists would even force fit everyone's history into it. But at the end of the day, when nothing is there you have no choice but to admit it. They tried their hardest not to though. When it comes to the Bible, the White man is on your side. Get a new excuse.
tried for centuries? the muthafucka tried to push the LIES about the Bible so Black people could be pushed away further from it. The people described in the Bible including the Christ was BLACK not fuck'n white.
How the fuck is the white man going to be on my side when the Israelites condemn his ass, get arrested for it, harassed, etc. you don't want to deal with the Bible because there is wickedness in your life that you love. you're probably a faggot
"So Black people could be pushed away further from it"? The Bible was forced on Black people at penalty of torture and/or death. There was no pushing away, they specifically institutionalized the spread of it to us, dumbass. Bringing Black slaves "to Christ" was one of the major justifications of the Slave Trade. You don't have the first clue about that slave book's history or your own. No wonder you think you're Jewish.
Part one read Exodus 3:14-15 which was the first time did the Lord speak to a man verbally. The white man has told and taught you a lie. first of all the Lord didn't even speak verbally to Adam and Eve, he communicated to them through the constellations of the stars. Second of all the first five books came during the time of Moses , I keep telling you Egyptology is way off and it is a study of a history which you all have turn it into a foolish religion.
Just to show you lack of understanding of the bible , Adam was even the first man according to the bible nor was the Lord known by name to Adam to Jacob , But then again you lack understanding. For all you negores that wanna be African stick a bone in your nose and put a plate in you big ass lips and prove to us you are Africans. meaningwhile the Hebrew Israelites is going to keep proving the truth and doing ouir mother fucking building one nation of people.
Since you're gullible enough to believe the White man's religion, it's not surprising that you're also gullible enough to believe his African stereotypes. And if you actually knew your Bible, then you'd be aware of the fact that Abraham and Jacob knew Yahweh's name perfectly.
But you don't know your Bible. So of course you're not aware of this.
Let's see if you can back up your claim , Prove that Jacob and Abraham knew his name . Secondly the letter "e" is not in the ancient hebrew letters , man you are so unlearn and easy to devour. Whiteman's religion is Christianity which is all lies and those lies was all adopted by the pagan religions of greeks who adopted it from Egypt who they adopted the same lies of paganism from the babylonian empire under Nimrod. Your out of your league son.
No, Adam didn't know the Lord's name , he spoke to Adam through the constellation of the stars. Even the children of Israel during the time of Moses didn't know his name , they called him Elohiem which only means POWER. He said I am the God (Power) of your fathers.
You have a been following Christianity and not the truth of the Hebrew Israelites which is a nation of people who have recorded a history meanwhile you being unlearn having attach the bible to a religion named Christianity.LOL
You guys really need to get off this idea that it's other people who are unlearned. I'm sure I know your Bible better than you. Prime example being this point here. Be quiet and learn:
Genesis 4:1 - Eve says Yahweh's name
Genesis 13:4 - Abraham calls Yahweh by name
Genesis 18:4 - Yahweh pronounces his name in front of Abraham
Now, since I know you're ignorant of your Bible's history you'll probably not realize that Yahweh's name is being spoken in these verses. Your cult religion doesn't teach you this, but when you see "the LORD" in the King James Bible it means that the name YHWH is what is actually in the Hebrew text. So what Gen 13:14 actually says is:
"Unto the place of the altar, which he had made there at the first: and there Abram called on the name of YHWH."
Simpleton you spell hgis name according to the white fake imposters who spell it Yahweh , so let me teach you and school you and make sure you send tithes to the nearest Hebrew Israelite school of UPK . His name is spell and pronounced Ya-Ha_Wah not ya-way . You owe some tithes.
You can make yourself look foolish with that ridiculous made-up Hebrew of UPK if you want. Whatever imaginary name you use, the facts stay the same. Abraham, Jacob, etc. all knew it long before Moses. Tithes? You actually pay these people for misteaching you? And here I am being a nice guy and schooling you for free.
I tell you what, for 20 bucks I'll even teach you why the Bible contradicts itself about when people learned' Yahweh's name.
The only thing you can teach me about the bible is what you was taught which was the religion of Christianity created by the Roman catholic church, LOL. Which is the worship of Baal resurrected from Nimrod's kingdom.
LOL, the first five books was written during the time of Moses not during the time of Adam and Eve . Moses and the scribes and elder s of Israel were the narrators of the first five books and put Yahawah name in and there's no "e" vowel in the ancient Hebrew .
3:13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. 3:15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers,
So why would you even say Eve called him Yahweh, when his name was not known before Moses ?
Moses and the scribes compiled the first five books of the bible. They were the ones who afterwards knew his name and then wrote the name in the writings. You need to more research before coming out here on a video agasinst the Israelites we study. And to think Christianity is of the bible just shows how unlearn you really are.
Really? So Moses went back and altered their words in his quotes and changed them to say Yahweh? That would make it false. It would also make this verse false and nonsensical.
Genesis 22:14 - And ABRAHAM called the name of that place Yahweh-yireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of Yahweh it shall be seen.
--
Abraham, not Moses, specifically names this place after Yahweh's name. So this never happened? Moses just made that up, huh? Works for me. Either way it shows it false.
Alter what words ? , do you mean put the actual name of Yahawah in his writing. You only can alter something written if it was already written or something already existed. But the writings never existed before Moses, so How could Moses alter something when he wrote the first original writings. You make no sense bring you weak teachers out here you too stupid.
The original word was Ahlahiman (Power) or to you it would be Elohiem (in the Yiddish along with your yahweh yiddish name). LOL
So what, in your imagination, did Abraham actually name the location of YAHWEH-yiireh? What is the actual name that should be there since you claim Moses altered it to say "YAHWEH-yireh". The place was named before Moses was born. Maybe you missed that part.
So your saying Abraham wrote one of the first five books of Moses ? LOL. What you don't actually understand for lack of knowledge what Moses wrote in Genesis was verbally handed and pass down. The Law of Moses were verbally already in existence through Adam to Jacob. What you can't figure out is why the Egyptians and the Israelites had similar laws because Noah taught his three sons the laws verbally.
I'm saying Abraham NAMED Yahweh-yireh before Moses was born. If you think the fictional character of Moses wrote Genesis, you're still left with the fact that this place had already been named by Abraham before Moses was born. Moses is just recounting the event. So since you're claiming that the name "Yahweh" only appears because Moses wrote it in there later, then what did Abraham name that place before Moses altered to say "YAHWEH"-yireh?
No, I didn't miss it but it was Moses who wrote the name of it because because Yahawah name was not known to Abraham. So Abraham only called it a name which he only knew that was known to him but it was Moses who wrote the text . Calling it is one thing but writing it is another thing . Quite simple.
And in Genesis 18:14 when he says "Is any thing too hard for Yahweh?", Yahweh didn't actually say those words. That's just Moses intentionally misquoting the Lord. Very interesting.
lannes33, How is Moses misquoting it , when means the same thing,the difference is that Moses uses the name of the true creator, YHWH.
What you don't understand is that the history of Adam to Jacob and his sons was told orally up until the time of Moses and the scribes, when Israel was a great nation. Even today you teach you own children orally about slavery and the Civil Right Era. How did Noah know to sacrifice a lamb or Abel ? these laws and tradition was past down verbally.
It's misquoting because it's changing the words the person spoke. That's the definition of "misquote". The verse is quoting Yahweh as saying "Is anything to hard for Yahweh?". You're saying this is not what Yahweh said, but something Moses later falsely put into his mouth. You're also saying that when the Bible tells us Abraham named Yahweh-yireh after the specific name "Yahweh", that Moses is lying about that too.
1:26 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, 1:27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgins name was Mary.
In the verses above it is written in narrative form, the narrator tells you that the angel was sent to a virgin name Mary who was espoused but as the story goes on Mary says she was had not even known a man but in the verse above the narrator says she was espouse to Joseph.
Skin packed wit melanin/they try to hold my poeple back but we come back again/ the game is played history done ran out and now we the truth for this fake shit, we out!!
To think we are Africans is a bigger shame. At least we know that we fit the prophecies of the bible, which no other race fits. Second of all, Jewish is a term use by Crackers and unlearn Negroes. The word or suffix "ish means to be like just like the word brownish is to be like.
The Africans hate Black men and rounded our ancestors up along with the arabs and sold us to these crackers and you think I'm going to attach myself to Africans , Nigger you out of you Homotep mind.
These Hebrewlite teachings are so damn silly. -ish also means "belonging to". Like "EnglISH", means belonging to the country of England. "Jewish" means belonging to the class of Jews.
And calling yourself an African like calling yourself a descendant of Leo Skippio Africunus a cracker an Italian who the people of Italy name the continent Africa in honor of him slaughtering the kushites (Ethiopians) .
You out of your league bring you teacher out here so I can smash his ass you too easy.
here is what I learned from the bible and why I love religion..
when you play a game or contest loosing is future winning..
and winning is future loosing..
now take this a step deeper consider all the facts when all seems to go ariy and you will finally reach the conclusion how permanently true this is...
This is an interesting video. It seems your stance would be that there is NO GOD because just like the canaanite EL statue you showed, the Egyptian and early Mesopotamian statue God's are no gods either.Yah is not the EL of canaan's pantheon. One question. Did Nebuchadnezzar destroy and burn to the ground an imaginery temple in jerusalem or did Solomon's temple actually exist as even the babylonian account of the conquest of judea indicates?
I'm not sure why you equate the recognition that mythology isn't to be taken as literal truth or accurate history with there being no god, but no. Atheism isn't my stance at all. As for Solomon's temple, it's mythical so far as I've seen. Though what religious people tend to have a hard time grasping is that myth is sometimes based on an underlying reality. So you might have a real event, but the myths surrounding the event are fabricated.Such as the Trojan war myths claiming gods were fighting.
If atheism isn't your stance then my question would be who do you believe the creator of all life to be and again i ask did the babylonians actually destroy the 1st Israelite temple which Solomon built or are the historical accounts of the Chaldean war campaign against the Jews false?
I believe the Creator is God. Called different names by different people. To answer your question a second time, I do not believe the temple of Solomon as described in the Bible was ever built. As to "historical accounts", you'd have to be more specific as to which accounts you're identifying as "historic".
He cannot answer that because he was not taught properly as Hebrew Israelites are. So you jammed lannes33 up with that history of nubucadnezzar , good post ahch.
Lexical analysis: `Elat ( the feminine form of El) `Elat is directly above the tree and Yah (Yahweh) is directly above the ram; (alt) = a place of suspense, uncertainty; y-h (a short form of Yahweh); g-t () = a place name, Gat.
Translation: The tree [of] `Elath, a place of suspense, the ram Yah of Gat.
[From Ruth Hestrin, "Understanding Asherah" BAR, Sept./Oct. 1991, pp. 50-52-59. The "Yah of Gat" translation by Harris and Hone
They also stated. " We have numerous examples of the seven branched tree used as an icon for Yah (Yahweh) and sometimes in an El/Yah combination with such a tree and/or a ram. Also the "Taw" after the El was an archaic ending for El."The "Yah of Gat" ligatures were recognized and translated by Harris and Hone.
"YAH" and the Menorah was found in various places.
Maybe you should check out the YT channel ancienthebreworg in order to figure out the links between the different ancient, pictographic languages; derived from the one language. Oh, and btw, talking abt copy catting; Nimrod the grandson of Ham, was the famous copy cat after the pre-deluvian ancients. Consequently, the Egyptians copied his copies abt a 1000 years afterwards (mastabah tombs and pyramids by M. Maspero (Secrets of the Lost Races; Renee Noorbergen, ISBN-13:978-1-57258-198-2.
That couldn't be possible since going by the timelines given in the Bible the Egyptians came long before the character of Nimrod would have existed. Egypt pre-dates Babylon by well over a thousand years.
No read the book I put in the previous comment, check the works of Maspero. And did you check the channel ancienthebreworg yet? The cuneiform script is older than the Egyptian hieroglyphics, way older. The Egyptians converted the names of the pre deluvian patriarch into Egyptian godlike names, as to give the impression that they pre-dated the Babel of Nimrod; clever! the mastabah tombs and pyramids tell another story abt the altered timeline of the Egyptians.
Cuneiform isn't dated much older than hieroglyphs and hieroglyphs weren't even the Egyptians' first form of writing. And I'm not sure why you think the egyptians would need to change the names to lie about their age. Their own records, setiment deposits, personal correspondence, etc. all show they're older than Babylon without even going to the king lists.
Also yall 2/3s bunch of ignorant niccas whiteman lovers cant proove or teach NOTHING to the Israelites, we have you niccaz in great dept, you sell outs slave f.traders are gonna pay good wait till we bring the truth nicca...
@Iannes33 Damn man I have no time for ignorant retorics as the title on your video says that you just came to the truth, so just humble tyself nicca and learn man, learn in silence to chew tyself aproved, b4re making phony videos about the truth, this is all a lot of BLASPHEMIES there is only *one GOD* in Israel if you knew any truth you would be way smart to known that...
The title isn't about me coming into the truth. I've never been "in the truth", if you mean believing a descend from mythical Jewish characters. The title is about brainwashed Hebrew Israelites being exposed to the truth about the god the European gave them. You call this truth blasphemy out of nothing but religious fear. You need to get past that shit and learn how to actually think.
Iannes33 Whatever tha hell you out to be we dont give a wink about your phony thesis, we are the children of the God of Israel we fear no deamons like u just to let you known heathen nicca...
You are basing your thesis on the writings of African gods that you don't believe. How can these writings (which i would like to read) be used as justifiable witnesses agains YHWH?
I put the word "god" in quotes because the word "el" is a shemitic word which simply means strength, power, shepherd, etc. A man can be an "el" along with beings from the heavens as well. You seem to use the word only to apply to the canaanite deity named "El".
But you weren't putting my use of "el" in quotes, you put my identification of Yahweh as a "god" in quotes. Yahweh is a god. A deity. But to your point, my belief or unbelief in African gods is irrelevant to Yahweh. It's not African gods that are witnesses against Yahweh, it's history, archaelogy, the contradictions and alterations in Yahweh's supposed word, and the sheer ridiculousness of Yahweh's myths in said word.
You like others accuse Yahweh of being a copy but have not brought forth proof of this.
Are you saying that our Torah/613 Laws is a copy of some other deity.
Please share with us where our Torah came from?
Deu 4:5 Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even asYHWH my God commanded me, that ye should do so in the land whither ye go to possess it.
V. 6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.
V. 7 For what nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them, as the YHWH our God is in all things that we call upon him for?
V. 8 And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this Law, which I set before you this day?
"As well? as the blatant and obvious copying of local gods and mythology to create Yahweh."
You can't have Yahweh without His Torah. This is where He is revealed is he not? Plus you guys accuse the heb. scriptures (the Law & the Prophets) of being plagiarized. This leads us back to the question. Who did Yahweh copy the 613 Commandments contained in Torah from?
Nothing in that statement says anything about those laws you arbitrarily selected. "The Torah" refers to much more than just his laws. It is the whole body of myths in the books. Such as where they copy the myths of the Mesopotamian gods Enlil and Ea and have Yahweh create a Flood then warn one man to build a boat to survive. Or when Elohim forms mankind out of the Earth in "their" own image as the Mesopotamian gods did before the Jewish one(s). And so on. Previous mythology copied by the Jews.
"Nothing in that statement says anything about those laws you arbitrarily selected."
I asked you a simple question. Where did the 613 Laws come from. These are the instructions that Hebrews r to live by. They r the foundation of our beliefs.
What other nation has these Laws?...I want to know. Please answer.
RE: the flood etc. That was part of world history, why wouldn't other nations write about the flood and historical accounts of creation? This was once taught to everyone back then.
iannes33, To the contrary, I did put the word "el" in quotes. As I stated further "el" doesn't always refer to a deity. YHWH is the Most High amongst the elohim (mighty ones or gods, angels).
If ur belief or unbelief in the african gods is irrelevant why would u use them to support your argument?
So now u claim it's history, arechaelogy, contradictions etc. Have u not once thought that others have considered these things & thru extensive study & resarch have come to a different conclusion?
You put the word "god", not "el" in quotes, hence my question. And I mentioned African gods to illustrate how late to the game the Bible's Eurasian sheepherder god is in comparison to the gods of real Black cultures. Whether one believes in those African gods or not doesn't matter as far as that goes.
Let's not play semantics on what was in quotes or not. My posts obviously shows what was. Regardless, your recent statement leads us back to my original point. Because one text is found after another does not mean that these african gods came into existance 1st. Especially when YHWH's text gives their origin.
I asked u before to present text that gives the origin of Mankind and of YHWH. My Heb. scriptures gives this info. I haven't found any African text that does this.
I'm not sure what original point you're referring to here, but when you have a book that claims Yahweh has been worshipped since the first man, but nothing in history or archaelogy shows any sign of anyone even having heard of him until the 1st millennium, it indicates rather strongly that he did not exist since the dawn of mankind. Especially .when we have extensive god lists from the area and Yahweh isn't on eany of them.
The fact is that book tells you why YHWH was suppressed throughout the world and that He would remain with the house of Shem. The hebrews were the caretakers of these records not the other nations. They didn't worship YHWH. They worshiped the gods (fallen malakim). YHWH chose a specific people to teach his ways & to spread His word after the flood.
Why is it that YHWH tells us about the african gods origins and they can't tell us about His? Those gods (watchers) used to work for YHWH.
But YHWH isn't suppressed and he isn't only in the house of Shem. We have his name and remnants of his worship by both the Jewish people and other cultures alike. We just don't have any before a few hundred years BC. There is no cut-off between the Jews and other people or mystical suppression of Yahweh. The oldest known mention of Yahweh is from a non-Jewish people for that matter.
No, my point was that the House of Shem was given the honor of carrying the Word of YHWH to the world. The sons of Ham and Japhet did not spread the knowledge of YHWH. According to scripture all of Noah's sons had knowledge of YHWH but Shem is who held onto and preserved this knowledge. The others sought after the gods. This is where the supression came in. During the ancient time the sons of Ham ruled the world under the authority of their gods. Obviously YHWH would not have been promoted.
It doesn't matter who you feel was honored by spreading the word. If Shem and his descendants worshipped Yahweh and were exposed to other cultures, which the Bible says they were, then we'd have remnants of Yahweh much older than this. Even if they didn't mingle with other people(which they did), the Bible itself shows Egyptian pharaohs speaking Yahweh's name, places being named after him, and temples being made to him. If these stories were true, we should have much, much older evidence.
I'm getting my info from the text. You are using your opinion. This is why that matters. The sons of Shem were to live as a set apart (holy) people. The sharing of YHWH with the world was to come at an appointed time. The sons of Israel had to be set up 1st.
The remnants that we have don't have to line up to your approved dates. You don't even believe the text of the african gods that you claim to be older than the hebrew text so how will this older evidence make u believe anyway?
That's exactly the problem. You're getting your info about the validity of these myths solely from the myths themselves. That's why you can't see the glaring falsehoods in them. If you did the same thing with a comic book you would believe Superman was real as well. Because the comic itself is going to present it's own isolated tale. You don't use something a storyteller to validate his own story.
Secular history validates the history in the Scriptures. Babylon, Medes, persians, Greeks, Romans, herod, pilate, there is evidence for all of this stuff. Are you saying that Flavius Josephus is a liar also?
You are making excuses 4 yourself and using the gods of egypt to back your play...while u have already admitted that u don't believe in them. The fact is that you r refusing to believe anything the witnesses that u r using to discredit Yahweh.
My shock at someone actually using Josephus as a source aside, there is no history that validates the actions of Yahweh in the Bible. If you want to try to present some, I'd love to see it. ALL of Egypt's firstborn being killed in one night? Magic locusts eating ALL the fruits and vegetables of Egypt? Daniel gaining weight while being starved and lions bowing before him? If you can back those historically you'd be a hero.
Yes Josephus...are u saying that his works are lies?...He was a historian just like others such as Herodetus.
Now you are asking for things which are ridiculous. What proof do we have of washington crossing the deliware?...was it filmed?...no we have records. This is the proof.
The proof we have of these things are from records. Just like with any other records, you can except them or reject them. But the evidence is stacked against you. Babylonian history shows that Israel was in babylon.
No, I'm not saying Josephus' works are lies. I'm saying they're boldfaced lies that I honestly didn't think anyone used this day and age before coming across BHIs. Saying he's as much of an historian as Herodotus seriously doesn't help your case.
And comparing a whoppingly supernatural catastrophe like all of Egypt's firstborn children dying in one night to Washington crossing the Delaware is comical. But to suggest the things of Exodus could pass without mention is utterly ridiculous.
You are simply bringing accusations. You whole angle is simply to deny and accuse. That won't cut it. Josephus' accounts coincide with world history. Did not the Romans invade israel?...Did they not set up Herod as king over Israel?...is this true or false?
Now I used washington as an example of the angle that u r coming from.
Ex: Prove to me that washington crossed the Delaware...
You're proof is what...historical records correct?...cuz u weren't there.
You're not using the same proof. I say give evidence for ALL the firstborn children in Egypt dying in one night. You respond with "Well, the Romans invaded Israel.". SO WHAT? What does that have to do with Yahweh's supposed magical attacks?
What evidence would I like of the Exodus disasters? A single contemporary mention of it for one. Anything. Mass graves for all their firstborn children. Letters of parents mourning. Writings from their enemies that would have taken them over immediately. Some sign of decimation and loss of power. Records of half their population leaving. Records of the rest dying from no vegetation or army to get more. Etc. Pick one.
The fact is that this even didnt destroy egypt. What enemies would have taken them over?...huh. They still had an army and power which extenede itself outside of egypt. Half the population didn't leave.
Please deal with facts and not speculation.
can I get a straight answer for any of my simple questions?
Over half it's population did leave. The 1st chapter says the Jews outnumbered the Egyptians. That's over half the population. And since in the myth they were slaves, that means that was it's workforce leaving too. What power would Egypt have with no fruits, no vegetables, all it's firstborn children dead, it's cattle blighted out and it's army under the Sea(Ex. 14:9-28)? It didn't destroy Egypt, because it obviously didn't happen. And that's why you have no evidence. There should be plenty.
I thought you were trying to say that half of the egyptians died while chasing after Israrel.
The text doesn't say that egypt had no food left. It says that their crops were destroyed. Egypt was greatly weakened but not utterly destroyed. They had a sphere of influence during that time anyway.
Again, this is the same as me asking you to show me graves of people who died in egypt 3500 yrs ago. Can you do it?...No.
Not just crops, cattle too. That'd be their meat. And much if not all of it's army gone too. And all it's firstborn children. You keep skipping over that curiously enough. Yet you can provide no mention of these catastrophes by anyone, no mentions of the god who supposedly caused it, and no period in time where Egypt suffered the loss of power these disasters would demand. And we can go 40 more rounds and you still will never have it.
That can be done. But are you going to try to attempt to falsely compare what would be written about every day events to the volumes of stuff that would certainly be written about these completely fanatstic events if they happened? Like with your George Washington sailing the Delaware/every firstborn child in Egypt dying in one night on command comparison?
280 flood accounts world wide of which approx. 80 are translated. Not to forget the 1000 + artifacts, conveniently hidden in basements of museums all around the world, for they support the story of the global flood as written Scriptures. Cuz those wld mean another serious blow to the theory of evolution.
Josephus is a Common Era writer. I'm not even sure why you're bringing him up for these events which take place hundreds if not thousands of years before Josephus was conceived.
This is how it works. He lived closer to the time of these events and had access to more accurate information that us. This is how it works with historians.
Most history that you believe right now was written by common era writers...hell, You're using Ivan Van Sertima on your video...major contradiction...LOL
Ivan Van Sertima's history is archaelogically and historically verifiable. Yahweh and his magical locusts are not. I cannot believe you don't see the difference.
What on Earth does Rome occupying Israel have to do with substanciating the Bible's claim that Yahweh brought in magic locusts to eat all the vegetation in Egypt? Simple question.
@IANNES33, well you are attempting to discredit Josephus as a historian. He wrote about these things. Rome, Greece, Egypt, Babylon etc. He even wrote about the heathens who lie about our history and try to speak against our Laws...sound familiar?
Why won't you ansswer the question? did Rome Occupy Israel, Did they put Herod on the throne?
...and it's relevant because josephus wrote about the "magic" locust.
You asked a simple question I gave you a simple answer
"Simple" is definitely one way to put it. Josephus is not remotely a contemporary of the magic locusts. He's giving a legend written long before him already. And the fact that I even have to explain this to you tells me it's time to wrap this up. As it's clear you're not going to provide this "evidence of Yahweh before the 1st millennium all over the place" as you claimed.
The evidence has been provided but you purposely refuse to address it nor will you answer any questions.
I'll tell you one more time of one artifact known as the "lachish ewer" from the 13th cent. BC. which has not only the Name of YHWH on it but a menorah as well.
Address this. why was this found in the land of Canaan (Israel)?
I don't see the tetragrammaton here. All i see is El, Asherah, and a god with a "Y" in it's name which he's claiming is Yahweh. Against everyone else's reading apparently. It may possibly say "Yah", as there are Canaanite dieties by that name and may be referring to Yam/Yaw/Yahu. But it doesn't say Yahweh, and the only people I can find who say it's Yahweh are religious sources.
You see the short form "Yah" along with the 7 branch menorah which is the symbol of Israel. This is most definately NOT referring to any pagan dieties. These are artifacts from Israel.
You purposely did not mention all of the information that was contained in the article.
Actually I see what is more likely "Yaw", but "Yah" is the name of a number of gods as I've already told you. I also see the analysis of this artifact and it being yahweh is not what they're saying. You falsely claimed it had the tetragrammaton on it but It does not. And being a copied deity Yahweh shares symbols with other gods. That symbol you link in your mind with Isra-EL is Canaanite and used earlier for other gods. Like Asherah, who, you know, happens to actually be on the artifact.
Comment removed
nowaystired 9 months ago
God is YHWH or God is Elohim
elazar79 11 months ago
@elazar79
El is God. YHWH is "the LORD".
Iannes33 11 months ago
Everyone is wrong. I have been given the truth, but I cannot reveal it at this moment.
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
Of what value is it to look for identity, if you have not evolved passed a foul mouthed neanderthal? May the most high free the Black people from ignorance., so sad.
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
@PHANTOMSLAYER777
This "Most High" invention is largely why Black people are in the state we're in. Before we adopted the lower theologies of primitive shepherds we were in the forefront of the known world. But not all of us are under the yolk of Jewish fables. And we are not the neanderthals. But we have a bad habit of embracing neanderthals and their myths.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@Iannes33 Get this. I will soon blow your mind. The lie is deeper than you thought. Contact me tonight, as I am saving the evidence. The deceit is great. You are lucky to contact me at this time. I will free you, or rather the most high will. Everyone is wrong. I mean "everyone," and i will prove it.
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
++Get this. I will soon blow your mind.++
OK. But that's pretty tough to do.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@Iannes33 Never think yourself smart. Some do and are absolute morons. Just have an open mind, and a willingness to learn.
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
@Iannes33 I'll soon send you data.
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
If we all know that blacks are the oldest race here how can you spit on where you came from
knightme23 7 months ago
Black people are slaves of mind and spirit. They are beautiful, but they cannot escape their own slavery. Why waste time listening to some foul mouthed person uttering imbecilities. How hopeless is the black man?
PHANTOMSLAYER777 1 year ago
Even the Muslims believe in Moses .. Called MUSA .. so he is a myth? It like 2 groups of different people and believes against your ideology!
If the Jewish people are encouraging to build and use this idols ..why do their laws state to brake them? And why did their ancestors like David destoyed them!
And about your smart question... ain't you showing (in your video of shame) pictures of what the bible state and describe as IDOLS or prostitutes? and aren't you stating that you are following 1!
demonsslayer4live 1 year ago
@demonsslayer4live
Islam and Christianity are both Abrahamic religions that grew out of Judaism. So it means nothing when you say "even" Muslims believe in Moses trying to suggest that this was some kind of independent conclusion. Of course they believe in Moses. They're all based on the same Abrahamic myths. And like I already said, the stance on idols is different at different times. That's why Jewsih law says break them...except when they don't.
And what idol am I following exactly?
Iannes33 1 year ago
Dear friend i can see your really smart, so smart that you where not thinking out of the box! Soo i have a question for you.. What happen to the golden calf in the time of Moses? Wasn't it destroyed? ANd like you read THE BIBLE so good! Ain't it forbidded to worship Idols .. man made dolls from stone or whats eva they call saints or gods? And doesn't the bible state in the new and old testament ... that they were destroyed!!!!
demonsslayer4live 1 year ago
Even whole cities burned down and everybody killed!!! BUT after all people like you and your followers went back to build them and follow this stone and man made prostitutes .... so they can keep earning money and sell their souls!
Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh Bless you and have mercy on you
demonsslayer4live 1 year ago
+"Even whole cities burned down and everybody killed!!!"+
And this is your god? A murderous lunatic with super powers? No thanks.
Iannes33 1 year ago
If you draw something or mold something out of earth.. and later you decide to destroy it.. can someone tell you not to destroy it? I think not because its your creation! not even the creation can speak up to you and say something! SOO Who are you to speak up and open your month and tell THE ALMIGTHY what to do! Even calling HIM names!
The One That Is Who He IS BLESS you!
demonsslayer4live 1 year ago
+"If you draw something or mold something out of earth.. and later you decide to destroy it.. can someone tell you not to destroy it?"+
If you give this creation consciousness and the ability to feel suffering, yes. This adds moral obligations to the situation.
+"SOO Who are you to speak up and open your month and tell THE ALMIGTHY what to do!"+
A being of intelligence that grants me the ability to do so, that's who.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Moral friend their is no morality cause your nothing else then a puppet .. a slave! And yes they feel but who cares, if He can replace it by a 1000 whenever He wants! Like a prisoner in the joint that thinks he's the big man but at the same time the state controls him and if he misbehave he gets electrocuted... and that happens daily in your moral world! And Yeah real intelligent, like a fool screaming to a officer or executioner and calling him names, not knowing the hell thats waiting him.
demonsslayer4live 1 year ago
+".. a slave! And yes they feel but who cares"+
The sentient person being killed by your psychotic god, for one.
+"And Yeah real intelligent, like a fool screaming to a officer or executioner and calling him names, not knowing the hell thats waiting him."+
Fortunately, your god doesn't actually exist so I can call him whatever names I want without consequence. But if he did exist, he would be an indefensibly evil man unworthy of praise or worship.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@demonsslayer4live
The Exodus is a mythical event and Moses is a fictional character. So no, there was no golden calf of Yahweh that was destroyed. And if you read your Bible you'll see that whether idols are forbidden depends on which book you read. At various periods of Jewish mythology the making of idols is encouraged(see Judges 17:3 in particular). But help me out here. What do idols have to do with this video?
Iannes33 1 year ago
isnt that horus he ain't my god! how is horus ur god and the elites worships horus and other gods. beside i think here's where we got confused we worshipped their gods thats why we went into slavery. fuk egeyption worship when egyption worship got us in this mess. when we dicover our history then we may find that we are of him and we must put the other manipulated images away. he's in us! when we wake up we will finally begin to see this.
mbclab60 1 year ago
@mbclab60
Are you a Hebrew Israelite? Ignore that earlier comment if you're not. Anyway, the elites "worship" Horus because they took him from you. Some of us are conscious enough to take him back, and some of us don't know any better so we worship the mentally insane god of the Bible the elites gave us instead to destroy us. Who is the "him" you're speaking of when you say "we are of him"?
Iannes33 1 year ago
A lot of the research done is actually pretty well rounded. I don't know where the hell you are getting yours from. But if you were honestly wanting to find answers and not trouble you would know this already. Do some research and stop playing around.
The way some of these brothers are acting proves they are Israel, they find out who they are and go right back to doing the same crap that got them into slavery to begin with.
r3tr0m4n 1 year ago
Jesus serves 2 purposes in the system of white supremacy. The first purpose is to make you a person that will not fight for your rights. The second is to make you ashamed to ask whites to help you fight for your right, because you see the crucifixion of Jesus in their intervention. So, we can go on and on about this, it also serves as a illustration to whites, not to be soft hearted or you will get crucified.
Katelnine 1 year ago
@Katelnine
I definitely agree about reason #1.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@Iannes33 In all respect, most whites that I speak with even those that are church bound..say Jesus has already paid the price! Get It!
Katelnine 1 year ago
lannes33,
The Bible is written in narrative form:
The Narrative Form Index (NFI) is a reference
guide for understanding, formulating, and validating
the experiences of research participants as they are told
and/or co-facilitated in telling. Several studies have
demonstrated the promise of narrative methods,
including applications of histroytelling and narratology.Abraham didnot write the book of Genesis Moses and the scribes did, LOL
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
This how unlearn you are you don't even know Hebrew , LOL for you to even say the name Yahawashi looks Chinese is funny in your ignorance. Egyptology makes a nigger stupid. ROFL.
Second of all it was Abraham who taught these heathen Hamites arithmetic and astrology.
shaparnapash 1 year ago
@shaparnapash
If you think "Yahawashi" is Hebrew, then it's safe to say that you don't know Hebrew either. And if you don't think "Yahawashi" looks Japanese, then you must not know what Japanese words look like. That's not surprising, since judging by that ridiculous Abraham comment you probably don't know much of anything other than what your cult leader mistaught you.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@lannes33,
So I guess you believe the Egyptians were the first with everything although other kingdoms pre-dates Egyptian kingdom. Astrology came from the Chaldean which Abraham left from.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
@Isaiahpriest
It doesn't matter whether there were other kingdoms that came before Egypt or not. What matters is that Egypt had already developed their math and sciences before your Jewish folk hero Abraham would have even been born. Aside from that obvious flaw in your claim, the Black civilizations were much more advanced than the lowly Hebrews. You can't teach your superiors.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Iannes33, so I guess according to you comment above the so called Negroes and Hispanics will never be able to teach or rule over white people because white people civilization was the first to come up with nuclear power and the first to come up with aircrafts that can go the speed of sound, LOL.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
America isn't a "White people civilization". And we've already taught White civilizations already.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Iannes33,
How is Moses lying ?, LOL when he was the one who written the first five books, It's like saying If I saying King Tut believe in Monotheism and then you write what I said in his full name Nebkheperure Tutankhamun does that make it a lie or make you a liar because you spell his name in his original form.
They say King Tut all the time but there is a full name written in many books. God meaning Power, Elohiem meaning The power and the Lord means the Power but in full it's YAHAWAH.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
@Isaiahpriest
If you were quoting a conversation about King Tutankhamen and wherever his name was used you replaced it with "Bob", you'd be misquoting this conversation. And if someone named a city "Tutankhamenu" after Tutankhamen, and you write that the name of the city was "Bobville", you'd be lying. That is not the name of the city. It's not even a transliterary equivalent.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Bob is not a sir name of Tutanhamen but king Tut is and term widely used. Unless if his name was Robert and I used the name Bob or Rob for sure it doesnot differ from the name Robert.
If I use the name almighty or Creator or The Lord then how is that misquoting something when even in your ignorance you would know who I'm talking about and referring to.
Same as Cassius Clay is on record at one time but now the name on record is Muhammed Ali. CHECK MATE!!!!! :D
shaparnapash 1 year ago
@shaparnapash Saying Almighty or Creator is not the same as saying Yahweh. Creator and Almighty are titles that can refer to many gods. If you said Creator, I would associate that with Amun long before a desert god like Yahweh. Nor is Elohim the same word function as Yahweh. There were many Elohim/gods. That's why Moses had to ask Yahweh for his name. To know which of the Elohim he was talking to. (cont'd)
Iannes33 1 year ago
I'm going to explain this one last time. Changing a proper name with an entirely different word is a misquote and false. If you name a city Clayville after Cassius, Cassius later changing his name to Ali doesn't change the name of the city. Abraham named the city Yahweh-yireh because he knew Yahweh's name. It's not a name Moses wrote in later because places names don't change like that. So if you're saying Moses made that name up himself, you're making him and the Bible false.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Yes, Moses change it because it was referred to as Yahawah.
No one said Moses made the name up that's what you are implying. What I'm saying is that Moses and the elder wrote the first five books according to how the Lord wanted it written. The first five books was not written by Abraham, whom he did not know the name of Yahawah but the writers of the first five books at the time of the construction of the first books did know the name of Yahawah. It's so simple to understand this.
:D
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Genesis 22:14 - And Abraham called the name of that place Yahweh-yireh: AS IT IS SAID TO THIS DAY, In the mount of Yahweh it shall be seen.
--
The verse says that Yahweh-yireh is the same name today as what Abraham originally named it. After the name of "Yahweh". Like I said, I'm not going to keep explaining this to you. You've just been exposed to a Bible mistake and obviously you're a little distraught about it. Come back later after you've had time to process this new information.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Hold up you said putting idols on you page is just the same as putting your child's picture in your wallet. Negroes please , an IDOL doesn't have life and breath in them contrary to a child does.
1st Cor12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. 12:2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, Carried (like a sucker) away unto these DUMB idols, even as ye were led,
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
"an IDOL doesn't have life and breath in them contrary to a child does."
Neither does the picture of a child.
Iannes33 1 year ago
LOL, I saw your gods on your page, animal heads with a man's body , LMAO. You so carnal that you need something tangible to believe in.
Tell me one thing that the Africans did for Negroes in America besides the Africans rounding us up and selling us to the white man. Tell the people what have these Africa done for us , at least the Hebrew Israelites are the only group of men that is down for us. The Arabs , the Africans , the Asians can care less about us .
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
You're so carnal you actually think that's a literal man with the literal head of a literal animal. Damn. That White man's religion has beat the spirituality right out of you and left you "dead".
Iannes33 1 year ago
What do you need a statue for anyhow , what purpose does it serve?
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
The same purpose keeping a picture of your child in your wallet serves.
Iannes33 1 year ago
An Idol doesnot have life in it nor can it speak but a child is a life breathing human being . Do you see the difference? An Idol is something which a man makes which is nothing but an molten image of a four legged beast which has no life and child is something the creator has created which has life
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
An Idol has no life in it , its a molten image of a four legged beast , just as crackers have the dumb cross of a white jesus still both is an idol of foolishness. A child has a life and was created by the creator and an idol is created by a fool to be admired.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
And you whole concept of Egyptology comes out from a cracker by the name of Gerald Massey from England. Not to mention Manetho who was a Greek which is another cracker by race.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Rather than going every which way and posting 16 different messages, try sticking to your original point which I've corrected you on: the prophets knowing Yahweh's name. I'm not going to bother with the other foolishness you're typing like Massey and whatnot. You don't even know your own Bible, so you're certainly not fit to argue about higher concepts like African spirituality or Egyptian history.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Who wrote the first five books Abraham or Moses? like is said before it was Moses who put the original name in the bible. If you did your homework you would understand that it's called the first five books of Moses but each book is written under different name , gotcha!:D
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
The Nile was not the start of the first civilization , how stupid and unlearn can you be the first known civilization was after the flood was the same region that the garden was at which was not the Nile.
Genesis 10:10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.
Africa comes from the name of a white man . Do your research kid.
Genesis
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
notice that this video has a Beanie Siegel soundtrack. Motherfucking garbage shit that the white man approves of. Sell your crack, bust yo gat
Fuck you muthafucka-- whoever posted this bullshit. The white man hides and destroys all the fuck'n records. May the most High either "wake u up" or kill yo punKKK ass
2HELLwitESAUnD2third 1 year ago
BS. The White man has tried for centuries to substanciate his Bible. His archaeologists would even force fit everyone's history into it. But at the end of the day, when nothing is there you have no choice but to admit it. They tried their hardest not to though. When it comes to the Bible, the White man is on your side. Get a new excuse.
Iannes33 1 year ago
tried for centuries? the muthafucka tried to push the LIES about the Bible so Black people could be pushed away further from it. The people described in the Bible including the Christ was BLACK not fuck'n white.
How the fuck is the white man going to be on my side when the Israelites condemn his ass, get arrested for it, harassed, etc. you don't want to deal with the Bible because there is wickedness in your life that you love. you're probably a faggot
2HELLwitESAUnD2third 1 year ago
"So Black people could be pushed away further from it"? The Bible was forced on Black people at penalty of torture and/or death. There was no pushing away, they specifically institutionalized the spread of it to us, dumbass. Bringing Black slaves "to Christ" was one of the major justifications of the Slave Trade. You don't have the first clue about that slave book's history or your own. No wonder you think you're Jewish.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Part one read Exodus 3:14-15 which was the first time did the Lord speak to a man verbally. The white man has told and taught you a lie. first of all the Lord didn't even speak verbally to Adam and Eve, he communicated to them through the constellations of the stars. Second of all the first five books came during the time of Moses , I keep telling you Egyptology is way off and it is a study of a history which you all have turn it into a foolish religion.
The first black men were in Sumer.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
@ Iannes33m
Just to show you lack of understanding of the bible , Adam was even the first man according to the bible nor was the Lord known by name to Adam to Jacob , But then again you lack understanding. For all you negores that wanna be African stick a bone in your nose and put a plate in you big ass lips and prove to us you are Africans. meaningwhile the Hebrew Israelites is going to keep proving the truth and doing ouir mother fucking building one nation of people.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Since you're gullible enough to believe the White man's religion, it's not surprising that you're also gullible enough to believe his African stereotypes. And if you actually knew your Bible, then you'd be aware of the fact that Abraham and Jacob knew Yahweh's name perfectly.
But you don't know your Bible. So of course you're not aware of this.
Iannes33 1 year ago
@ Iannes33,
Let's see if you can back up your claim , Prove that Jacob and Abraham knew his name . Secondly the letter "e" is not in the ancient hebrew letters , man you are so unlearn and easy to devour. Whiteman's religion is Christianity which is all lies and those lies was all adopted by the pagan religions of greeks who adopted it from Egypt who they adopted the same lies of paganism from the babylonian empire under Nimrod. Your out of your league son.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Damn. Now that I've checked again, it looks like even Adam knew "the Lord's" name too.
Iannes33 1 year ago
No, Adam didn't know the Lord's name , he spoke to Adam through the constellation of the stars. Even the children of Israel during the time of Moses didn't know his name , they called him Elohiem which only means POWER. He said I am the God (Power) of your fathers.
You have a been following Christianity and not the truth of the Hebrew Israelites which is a nation of people who have recorded a history meanwhile you being unlearn having attach the bible to a religion named Christianity.LOL
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
You guys really need to get off this idea that it's other people who are unlearned. I'm sure I know your Bible better than you. Prime example being this point here. Be quiet and learn:
Genesis 4:1 - Eve says Yahweh's name
Genesis 13:4 - Abraham calls Yahweh by name
Genesis 18:4 - Yahweh pronounces his name in front of Abraham
Genesis 28:16 - Jacob says Yahweh's name
(cont'd)
Iannes33 1 year ago
Now, since I know you're ignorant of your Bible's history you'll probably not realize that Yahweh's name is being spoken in these verses. Your cult religion doesn't teach you this, but when you see "the LORD" in the King James Bible it means that the name YHWH is what is actually in the Hebrew text. So what Gen 13:14 actually says is:
"Unto the place of the altar, which he had made there at the first: and there Abram called on the name of YHWH."
Iannes33 1 year ago
Simpleton you spell hgis name according to the white fake imposters who spell it Yahweh , so let me teach you and school you and make sure you send tithes to the nearest Hebrew Israelite school of UPK . His name is spell and pronounced Ya-Ha_Wah not ya-way . You owe some tithes.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
You can make yourself look foolish with that ridiculous made-up Hebrew of UPK if you want. Whatever imaginary name you use, the facts stay the same. Abraham, Jacob, etc. all knew it long before Moses. Tithes? You actually pay these people for misteaching you? And here I am being a nice guy and schooling you for free.
I tell you what, for 20 bucks I'll even teach you why the Bible contradicts itself about when people learned' Yahweh's name.
Iannes33 1 year ago
The only thing you can teach me about the bible is what you was taught which was the religion of Christianity created by the Roman catholic church, LOL. Which is the worship of Baal resurrected from Nimrod's kingdom.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
LOL, the first five books was written during the time of Moses not during the time of Adam and Eve . Moses and the scribes and elder s of Israel were the narrators of the first five books and put Yahawah name in and there's no "e" vowel in the ancient Hebrew .
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
3:13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. 3:15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers,
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Exodus 6-3: And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name YAHWEH was I not known to them.
Iannes33 1 year ago
So why would you even say Eve called him Yahweh, when his name was not known before Moses ?
Moses and the scribes compiled the first five books of the bible. They were the ones who afterwards knew his name and then wrote the name in the writings. You need to more research before coming out here on a video agasinst the Israelites we study. And to think Christianity is of the bible just shows how unlearn you really are.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Really? So Moses went back and altered their words in his quotes and changed them to say Yahweh? That would make it false. It would also make this verse false and nonsensical.
Genesis 22:14 - And ABRAHAM called the name of that place Yahweh-yireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of Yahweh it shall be seen.
--
Abraham, not Moses, specifically names this place after Yahweh's name. So this never happened? Moses just made that up, huh? Works for me. Either way it shows it false.
Iannes33 1 year ago
Alter what words ? , do you mean put the actual name of Yahawah in his writing. You only can alter something written if it was already written or something already existed. But the writings never existed before Moses, so How could Moses alter something when he wrote the first original writings. You make no sense bring you weak teachers out here you too stupid.
The original word was Ahlahiman (Power) or to you it would be Elohiem (in the Yiddish along with your yahweh yiddish name). LOL
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
So what, in your imagination, did Abraham actually name the location of YAHWEH-yiireh? What is the actual name that should be there since you claim Moses altered it to say "YAHWEH-yireh". The place was named before Moses was born. Maybe you missed that part.
Iannes33 1 year ago
So your saying Abraham wrote one of the first five books of Moses ? LOL. What you don't actually understand for lack of knowledge what Moses wrote in Genesis was verbally handed and pass down. The Law of Moses were verbally already in existence through Adam to Jacob. What you can't figure out is why the Egyptians and the Israelites had similar laws because Noah taught his three sons the laws verbally.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
I'm saying Abraham NAMED Yahweh-yireh before Moses was born. If you think the fictional character of Moses wrote Genesis, you're still left with the fact that this place had already been named by Abraham before Moses was born. Moses is just recounting the event. So since you're claiming that the name "Yahweh" only appears because Moses wrote it in there later, then what did Abraham name that place before Moses altered to say "YAHWEH"-yireh?
Iannes33 1 year ago
No, I didn't miss it but it was Moses who wrote the name of it because because Yahawah name was not known to Abraham. So Abraham only called it a name which he only knew that was known to him but it was Moses who wrote the text . Calling it is one thing but writing it is another thing . Quite simple.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
OK. So when the Bible clearly says Abraham named the place "Yahweh-yireh" after YAHWEH, that's just Moses making the shit up. Falsehood. Gotcha.
Iannes33 1 year ago
And in Genesis 18:14 when he says "Is any thing too hard for Yahweh?", Yahweh didn't actually say those words. That's just Moses intentionally misquoting the Lord. Very interesting.
Iannes33 1 year ago
lannes33, How is Moses misquoting it , when means the same thing,the difference is that Moses uses the name of the true creator, YHWH.
What you don't understand is that the history of Adam to Jacob and his sons was told orally up until the time of Moses and the scribes, when Israel was a great nation. Even today you teach you own children orally about slavery and the Civil Right Era. How did Noah know to sacrifice a lamb or Abel ? these laws and tradition was past down verbally.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
It's misquoting because it's changing the words the person spoke. That's the definition of "misquote". The verse is quoting Yahweh as saying "Is anything to hard for Yahweh?". You're saying this is not what Yahweh said, but something Moses later falsely put into his mouth. You're also saying that when the Bible tells us Abraham named Yahweh-yireh after the specific name "Yahweh", that Moses is lying about that too.
Iannes33 1 year ago
1:26 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, 1:27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgins name was Mary.
In the verses above it is written in narrative form, the narrator tells you that the angel was sent to a virgin name Mary who was espoused but as the story goes on Mary says she was had not even known a man but in the verse above the narrator says she was espouse to Joseph.
:D
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Skin packed wit melanin/they try to hold my poeple back but we come back again/ the game is played history done ran out and now we the truth for this fake shit, we out!!
Great Video!
TheDonSante 2 years ago
Thanks. Black people thinking "the truth" is that they're Jewish is a damn shame.
Iannes33 2 years ago
To think we are Africans is a bigger shame. At least we know that we fit the prophecies of the bible, which no other race fits. Second of all, Jewish is a term use by Crackers and unlearn Negroes. The word or suffix "ish means to be like just like the word brownish is to be like.
The Africans hate Black men and rounded our ancestors up along with the arabs and sold us to these crackers and you think I'm going to attach myself to Africans , Nigger you out of you Homotep mind.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
These Hebrewlite teachings are so damn silly. -ish also means "belonging to". Like "EnglISH", means belonging to the country of England. "Jewish" means belonging to the class of Jews.
Look up Titus 1:14.
Iannes33 1 year ago
There is no such word as Hebrewite And the word Hebrew I guess to you means crossed over which is a christianity doctrine lie , lol.
Before make another silly video you better first get taught about hebrew Israelites
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
"Hebrewlite" is a contraction of your silly title "Hebrew Israelite". Which is like calliing yourself a "British Englishman".
Iannes33 1 year ago
And calling yourself an African like calling yourself a descendant of Leo Skippio Africunus a cracker an Italian who the people of Italy name the continent Africa in honor of him slaughtering the kushites (Ethiopians) .
You out of your league bring you teacher out here so I can smash his ass you too easy.
Hebrew Israelites still stopping out lies.
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
Your misunderstanding of words and their origins aside, "Jewish" still means being a Jew. You can go from there wherever you want.
Iannes33 1 year ago
it doesn't mean there is a God but it does mean that the bible has been proven valid in that certain area I read...
woyay 2 years ago
here is what I learned from the bible and why I love religion..
when you play a game or contest loosing is future winning..
and winning is future loosing..
now take this a step deeper consider all the facts when all seems to go ariy and you will finally reach the conclusion how permanently true this is...
by defeat I gain conquering..
woyay 2 years ago
This is an interesting video. It seems your stance would be that there is NO GOD because just like the canaanite EL statue you showed, the Egyptian and early Mesopotamian statue God's are no gods either.Yah is not the EL of canaan's pantheon. One question. Did Nebuchadnezzar destroy and burn to the ground an imaginery temple in jerusalem or did Solomon's temple actually exist as even the babylonian account of the conquest of judea indicates?
ZadokbenIsrael 2 years ago 3
I'm not sure why you equate the recognition that mythology isn't to be taken as literal truth or accurate history with there being no god, but no. Atheism isn't my stance at all. As for Solomon's temple, it's mythical so far as I've seen. Though what religious people tend to have a hard time grasping is that myth is sometimes based on an underlying reality. So you might have a real event, but the myths surrounding the event are fabricated.Such as the Trojan war myths claiming gods were fighting.
Iannes33 2 years ago
If atheism isn't your stance then my question would be who do you believe the creator of all life to be and again i ask did the babylonians actually destroy the 1st Israelite temple which Solomon built or are the historical accounts of the Chaldean war campaign against the Jews false?
ZadokbenIsrael 2 years ago
I believe the Creator is God. Called different names by different people. To answer your question a second time, I do not believe the temple of Solomon as described in the Bible was ever built. As to "historical accounts", you'd have to be more specific as to which accounts you're identifying as "historic".
Iannes33 2 years ago
He cannot answer that because he was not taught properly as Hebrew Israelites are. So you jammed lannes33 up with that history of nubucadnezzar , good post ahch.
These Niggers are on some homotep shit
Isaiahpriest 1 year ago
why dont you worry about who your friends in gangs and crack you sale to the whjte man,you make him slave to the drugs
TheBelovedpureness 2 years ago
Lexical analysis: `Elat ( the feminine form of El) `Elat is directly above the tree and Yah (Yahweh) is directly above the ram; (alt) = a place of suspense, uncertainty; y-h (a short form of Yahweh); g-t () = a place name, Gat.
Translation: The tree [of] `Elath, a place of suspense, the ram Yah of Gat.
[From Ruth Hestrin, "Understanding Asherah" BAR, Sept./Oct. 1991, pp. 50-52-59. The "Yah of Gat" translation by Harris and Hone
FalseProphetKilla 2 years ago 2
They also stated. " We have numerous examples of the seven branched tree used as an icon for Yah (Yahweh) and sometimes in an El/Yah combination with such a tree and/or a ram. Also the "Taw" after the El was an archaic ending for El."The "Yah of Gat" ligatures were recognized and translated by Harris and Hone.
"YAH" and the Menorah was found in various places.
FalseProphetKilla 2 years ago 2
Maybe you should check out the YT channel ancienthebreworg in order to figure out the links between the different ancient, pictographic languages; derived from the one language. Oh, and btw, talking abt copy catting; Nimrod the grandson of Ham, was the famous copy cat after the pre-deluvian ancients. Consequently, the Egyptians copied his copies abt a 1000 years afterwards (mastabah tombs and pyramids by M. Maspero (Secrets of the Lost Races; Renee Noorbergen, ISBN-13:978-1-57258-198-2.
deborahbetty58 2 years ago
sry Rene Noorbergen
deborahbetty58 2 years ago
That couldn't be possible since going by the timelines given in the Bible the Egyptians came long before the character of Nimrod would have existed. Egypt pre-dates Babylon by well over a thousand years.
Iannes33 2 years ago
No read the book I put in the previous comment, check the works of Maspero. And did you check the channel ancienthebreworg yet? The cuneiform script is older than the Egyptian hieroglyphics, way older. The Egyptians converted the names of the pre deluvian patriarch into Egyptian godlike names, as to give the impression that they pre-dated the Babel of Nimrod; clever! the mastabah tombs and pyramids tell another story abt the altered timeline of the Egyptians.
deborahbetty58 2 years ago
Cuneiform isn't dated much older than hieroglyphs and hieroglyphs weren't even the Egyptians' first form of writing. And I'm not sure why you think the egyptians would need to change the names to lie about their age. Their own records, setiment deposits, personal correspondence, etc. all show they're older than Babylon without even going to the king lists.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Unless by "much" you mean only a few couple hundred years or so.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Also yall 2/3s bunch of ignorant niccas whiteman lovers cant proove or teach NOTHING to the Israelites, we have you niccaz in great dept, you sell outs slave f.traders are gonna pay good wait till we bring the truth nicca...
edgarmendex 2 years ago
Tell me Ed. Which god of Israel is your father, El or Yahweh?
Iannes33 2 years ago
@Iannes33 Damn man I have no time for ignorant retorics as the title on your video says that you just came to the truth, so just humble tyself nicca and learn man, learn in silence to chew tyself aproved, b4re making phony videos about the truth, this is all a lot of BLASPHEMIES there is only *one GOD* in Israel if you knew any truth you would be way smart to known that...
edgarmendex 2 years ago
The title isn't about me coming into the truth. I've never been "in the truth", if you mean believing a descend from mythical Jewish characters. The title is about brainwashed Hebrew Israelites being exposed to the truth about the god the European gave them. You call this truth blasphemy out of nothing but religious fear. You need to get past that shit and learn how to actually think.
Iannes33 2 years ago
a desend=I descend
Iannes33 2 years ago
Iannes33 Whatever tha hell you out to be we dont give a wink about your phony thesis, we are the children of the God of Israel we fear no deamons like u just to let you known heathen nicca...
edgarmendex 2 years ago 3
You are basing your thesis on the writings of African gods that you don't believe. How can these writings (which i would like to read) be used as justifiable witnesses agains YHWH?
I put the word "god" in quotes because the word "el" is a shemitic word which simply means strength, power, shepherd, etc. A man can be an "el" along with beings from the heavens as well. You seem to use the word only to apply to the canaanite deity named "El".
Profit613 2 years ago
But you weren't putting my use of "el" in quotes, you put my identification of Yahweh as a "god" in quotes. Yahweh is a god. A deity. But to your point, my belief or unbelief in African gods is irrelevant to Yahweh. It's not African gods that are witnesses against Yahweh, it's history, archaelogy, the contradictions and alterations in Yahweh's supposed word, and the sheer ridiculousness of Yahweh's myths in said word.
Iannes33 2 years ago
As well as the blatant and obvious copying of local gods and mythology to create Yahweh.
Iannes33 2 years ago
You like others accuse Yahweh of being a copy but have not brought forth proof of this.
Are you saying that our Torah/613 Laws is a copy of some other deity.
Please share with us where our Torah came from?
Deu 4:5 Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even asYHWH my God commanded me, that ye should do so in the land whither ye go to possess it.
Cont...
Profit613 2 years ago 2
V. 6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.
V. 7 For what nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them, as the YHWH our God is in all things that we call upon him for?
V. 8 And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this Law, which I set before you this day?
???
Profit613 2 years ago 2
"Are you saying that our Torah/613 Laws is a copy of some other deity. Please share with us where our Torah came from?"
Please show me where I said anything about these random Torah laws you've just posted.
Iannes33 2 years ago
"As well? as the blatant and obvious copying of local gods and mythology to create Yahweh."
You can't have Yahweh without His Torah. This is where He is revealed is he not? Plus you guys accuse the heb. scriptures (the Law & the Prophets) of being plagiarized. This leads us back to the question. Who did Yahweh copy the 613 Commandments contained in Torah from?
Which one of these African gods have it?
Profit613 2 years ago
Nothing in that statement says anything about those laws you arbitrarily selected. "The Torah" refers to much more than just his laws. It is the whole body of myths in the books. Such as where they copy the myths of the Mesopotamian gods Enlil and Ea and have Yahweh create a Flood then warn one man to build a boat to survive. Or when Elohim forms mankind out of the Earth in "their" own image as the Mesopotamian gods did before the Jewish one(s). And so on. Previous mythology copied by the Jews.
Iannes33 2 years ago
"Nothing in that statement says anything about those laws you arbitrarily selected."
I asked you a simple question. Where did the 613 Laws come from. These are the instructions that Hebrews r to live by. They r the foundation of our beliefs.
What other nation has these Laws?...I want to know. Please answer.
RE: the flood etc. That was part of world history, why wouldn't other nations write about the flood and historical accounts of creation? This was once taught to everyone back then.
Profit613 2 years ago
iannes33, To the contrary, I did put the word "el" in quotes. As I stated further "el" doesn't always refer to a deity. YHWH is the Most High amongst the elohim (mighty ones or gods, angels).
If ur belief or unbelief in the african gods is irrelevant why would u use them to support your argument?
So now u claim it's history, arechaelogy, contradictions etc. Have u not once thought that others have considered these things & thru extensive study & resarch have come to a different conclusion?
Profit613 2 years ago
Actually you didn't put "el" in quotes. You said:
"Since you claim that YAHWEH is a new 'god'"
You put the word "god", not "el" in quotes, hence my question. And I mentioned African gods to illustrate how late to the game the Bible's Eurasian sheepherder god is in comparison to the gods of real Black cultures. Whether one believes in those African gods or not doesn't matter as far as that goes.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Let's not play semantics on what was in quotes or not. My posts obviously shows what was. Regardless, your recent statement leads us back to my original point. Because one text is found after another does not mean that these african gods came into existance 1st. Especially when YHWH's text gives their origin.
I asked u before to present text that gives the origin of Mankind and of YHWH. My Heb. scriptures gives this info. I haven't found any African text that does this.
Profit613 2 years ago
I'm not sure what original point you're referring to here, but when you have a book that claims Yahweh has been worshipped since the first man, but nothing in history or archaelogy shows any sign of anyone even having heard of him until the 1st millennium, it indicates rather strongly that he did not exist since the dawn of mankind. Especially .when we have extensive god lists from the area and Yahweh isn't on eany of them.
Iannes33 2 years ago
The fact is that book tells you why YHWH was suppressed throughout the world and that He would remain with the house of Shem. The hebrews were the caretakers of these records not the other nations. They didn't worship YHWH. They worshiped the gods (fallen malakim). YHWH chose a specific people to teach his ways & to spread His word after the flood.
Why is it that YHWH tells us about the african gods origins and they can't tell us about His? Those gods (watchers) used to work for YHWH.
Profit613 2 years ago
But YHWH isn't suppressed and he isn't only in the house of Shem. We have his name and remnants of his worship by both the Jewish people and other cultures alike. We just don't have any before a few hundred years BC. There is no cut-off between the Jews and other people or mystical suppression of Yahweh. The oldest known mention of Yahweh is from a non-Jewish people for that matter.
Iannes33 2 years ago
No, my point was that the House of Shem was given the honor of carrying the Word of YHWH to the world. The sons of Ham and Japhet did not spread the knowledge of YHWH. According to scripture all of Noah's sons had knowledge of YHWH but Shem is who held onto and preserved this knowledge. The others sought after the gods. This is where the supression came in. During the ancient time the sons of Ham ruled the world under the authority of their gods. Obviously YHWH would not have been promoted.
Profit613 2 years ago
It doesn't matter who you feel was honored by spreading the word. If Shem and his descendants worshipped Yahweh and were exposed to other cultures, which the Bible says they were, then we'd have remnants of Yahweh much older than this. Even if they didn't mingle with other people(which they did), the Bible itself shows Egyptian pharaohs speaking Yahweh's name, places being named after him, and temples being made to him. If these stories were true, we should have much, much older evidence.
Iannes33 2 years ago
I'm getting my info from the text. You are using your opinion. This is why that matters. The sons of Shem were to live as a set apart (holy) people. The sharing of YHWH with the world was to come at an appointed time. The sons of Israel had to be set up 1st.
The remnants that we have don't have to line up to your approved dates. You don't even believe the text of the african gods that you claim to be older than the hebrew text so how will this older evidence make u believe anyway?
Profit613 2 years ago
That's exactly the problem. You're getting your info about the validity of these myths solely from the myths themselves. That's why you can't see the glaring falsehoods in them. If you did the same thing with a comic book you would believe Superman was real as well. Because the comic itself is going to present it's own isolated tale. You don't use something a storyteller to validate his own story.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Secular history validates the history in the Scriptures. Babylon, Medes, persians, Greeks, Romans, herod, pilate, there is evidence for all of this stuff. Are you saying that Flavius Josephus is a liar also?
You are making excuses 4 yourself and using the gods of egypt to back your play...while u have already admitted that u don't believe in them. The fact is that you r refusing to believe anything the witnesses that u r using to discredit Yahweh.
Your own testimony has become unreliable.
Profit613 2 years ago
My shock at someone actually using Josephus as a source aside, there is no history that validates the actions of Yahweh in the Bible. If you want to try to present some, I'd love to see it. ALL of Egypt's firstborn being killed in one night? Magic locusts eating ALL the fruits and vegetables of Egypt? Daniel gaining weight while being starved and lions bowing before him? If you can back those historically you'd be a hero.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Yes Josephus...are u saying that his works are lies?...He was a historian just like others such as Herodetus.
Now you are asking for things which are ridiculous. What proof do we have of washington crossing the deliware?...was it filmed?...no we have records. This is the proof.
The proof we have of these things are from records. Just like with any other records, you can except them or reject them. But the evidence is stacked against you. Babylonian history shows that Israel was in babylon.
Profit613 2 years ago
No, I'm not saying Josephus' works are lies. I'm saying they're boldfaced lies that I honestly didn't think anyone used this day and age before coming across BHIs. Saying he's as much of an historian as Herodotus seriously doesn't help your case.
And comparing a whoppingly supernatural catastrophe like all of Egypt's firstborn children dying in one night to Washington crossing the Delaware is comical. But to suggest the things of Exodus could pass without mention is utterly ridiculous.
Iannes33 2 years ago
You are simply bringing accusations. You whole angle is simply to deny and accuse. That won't cut it. Josephus' accounts coincide with world history. Did not the Romans invade israel?...Did they not set up Herod as king over Israel?...is this true or false?
Now I used washington as an example of the angle that u r coming from.
Ex: Prove to me that washington crossed the Delaware...
You're proof is what...historical records correct?...cuz u weren't there.
I'm using the same proof.
Profit613 2 years ago
You're not using the same proof. I say give evidence for ALL the firstborn children in Egypt dying in one night. You respond with "Well, the Romans invaded Israel.". SO WHAT? What does that have to do with Yahweh's supposed magical attacks?
Iannes33 2 years ago
What evidence would you like for that...pictures?
Give me evidence that this didn't take place.
Profit613 2 years ago
What evidence would I like of the Exodus disasters? A single contemporary mention of it for one. Anything. Mass graves for all their firstborn children. Letters of parents mourning. Writings from their enemies that would have taken them over immediately. Some sign of decimation and loss of power. Records of half their population leaving. Records of the rest dying from no vegetation or army to get more. Etc. Pick one.
Iannes33 2 years ago
The fact is that this even didnt destroy egypt. What enemies would have taken them over?...huh. They still had an army and power which extenede itself outside of egypt. Half the population didn't leave.
Please deal with facts and not speculation.
can I get a straight answer for any of my simple questions?
Profit613 2 years ago
Over half it's population did leave. The 1st chapter says the Jews outnumbered the Egyptians. That's over half the population. And since in the myth they were slaves, that means that was it's workforce leaving too. What power would Egypt have with no fruits, no vegetables, all it's firstborn children dead, it's cattle blighted out and it's army under the Sea(Ex. 14:9-28)? It didn't destroy Egypt, because it obviously didn't happen. And that's why you have no evidence. There should be plenty.
Iannes33 2 years ago
I thought you were trying to say that half of the egyptians died while chasing after Israrel.
The text doesn't say that egypt had no food left. It says that their crops were destroyed. Egypt was greatly weakened but not utterly destroyed. They had a sphere of influence during that time anyway.
Again, this is the same as me asking you to show me graves of people who died in egypt 3500 yrs ago. Can you do it?...No.
You're points are weak.
Profit613 2 years ago
Not just crops, cattle too. That'd be their meat. And much if not all of it's army gone too. And all it's firstborn children. You keep skipping over that curiously enough. Yet you can provide no mention of these catastrophes by anyone, no mentions of the god who supposedly caused it, and no period in time where Egypt suffered the loss of power these disasters would demand. And we can go 40 more rounds and you still will never have it.
This is comic book level fantasy.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Give me sources outside contemporary sources of egyptian history that spoke of their current events including their gods.
Profit613 2 years ago
Give us outside contemprary historical sources of egypt which records the current events of that time.
Profit613 2 years ago
That can be done. But are you going to try to attempt to falsely compare what would be written about every day events to the volumes of stuff that would certainly be written about these completely fanatstic events if they happened? Like with your George Washington sailing the Delaware/every firstborn child in Egypt dying in one night on command comparison?
Iannes33 2 years ago
280 flood accounts world wide of which approx. 80 are translated. Not to forget the 1000 + artifacts, conveniently hidden in basements of museums all around the world, for they support the story of the global flood as written Scriptures. Cuz those wld mean another serious blow to the theory of evolution.
deborahbetty58 2 years ago 3
Josephus is a Common Era writer. I'm not even sure why you're bringing him up for these events which take place hundreds if not thousands of years before Josephus was conceived.
.
Iannes33 2 years ago
This is how it works. He lived closer to the time of these events and had access to more accurate information that us. This is how it works with historians.
Most history that you believe right now was written by common era writers...hell, You're using Ivan Van Sertima on your video...major contradiction...LOL
Profit613 2 years ago
Ivan Van Sertima's history is archaelogically and historically verifiable. Yahweh and his magical locusts are not. I cannot believe you don't see the difference.
Iannes33 2 years ago
So is Josephus', Like I said, did not the romans occupy Israel? was not herod king over israel in the 1st cent. BC...?
Yes or no...simple question.
Profit613 2 years ago
@Profit613
What on Earth does Rome occupying Israel have to do with substanciating the Bible's claim that Yahweh brought in magic locusts to eat all the vegetation in Egypt? Simple question.
Iannes33 2 years ago
@IANNES33, well you are attempting to discredit Josephus as a historian. He wrote about these things. Rome, Greece, Egypt, Babylon etc. He even wrote about the heathens who lie about our history and try to speak against our Laws...sound familiar?
Why won't you ansswer the question? did Rome Occupy Israel, Did they put Herod on the throne?
...and it's relevant because josephus wrote about the "magic" locust.
You asked a simple question I gave you a simple answer
Profit613 2 years ago 2
"Simple" is definitely one way to put it. Josephus is not remotely a contemporary of the magic locusts. He's giving a legend written long before him already. And the fact that I even have to explain this to you tells me it's time to wrap this up. As it's clear you're not going to provide this "evidence of Yahweh before the 1st millennium all over the place" as you claimed.
Iannes33 2 years ago
The evidence has been provided but you purposely refuse to address it nor will you answer any questions.
I'll tell you one more time of one artifact known as the "lachish ewer" from the 13th cent. BC. which has not only the Name of YHWH on it but a menorah as well.
Address this. why was this found in the land of Canaan (Israel)?
Profit613 2 years ago
I've heard of it having the name El, but not having the tetragrammaton of YHWH. Post your source and I'll take a look.
Iannes33 2 years ago
Ok, I'll PM it to u.
Profit613 2 years ago
I don't see the tetragrammaton here. All i see is El, Asherah, and a god with a "Y" in it's name which he's claiming is Yahweh. Against everyone else's reading apparently. It may possibly say "Yah", as there are Canaanite dieties by that name and may be referring to Yam/Yaw/Yahu. But it doesn't say Yahweh, and the only people I can find who say it's Yahweh are religious sources.
Iannes33 2 years ago
You see the short form "Yah" along with the 7 branch menorah which is the symbol of Israel. This is most definately NOT referring to any pagan dieties. These are artifacts from Israel.
You purposely did not mention all of the information that was contained in the article.
Profit613 2 years ago
Actually I see what is more likely "Yaw", but "Yah" is the name of a number of gods as I've already told you. I also see the analysis of this artifact and it being yahweh is not what they're saying. You falsely claimed it had the tetragrammaton on it but It does not. And being a copied deity Yahweh shares symbols with other gods. That symbol you link in your mind with Isra-EL is Canaanite and used earlier for other gods. Like Asherah, who, you know, happens to actually be on the artifact.
Iannes33 2 years ago