But after the Suez Channel conflict also started, the world shifted their attention to that conflict. That gave the Sovietunion the chance to quickly take Hungary back. They had to be quick about it, because the americans used the hungarian revolution as propaganda against the Sovietunion, showing the world how the communists massacering the people of Hungary, who are fighting for freedom and independence. The red army used as many tanks to crush the revolution as Germany used in all of WW2.
Let set things straight! This was a fight for freedom. Hungary wanted to detach themselfs from the soviet communist block and wanted all of the red army troops leave, that occupied the country. In his radio speech Imre Nagy said "Hungary wishes to live in piece with it's neighbors, including the Sovietunion and all of the countries of the world. Hungary wishes to stay neutral and don't wan't to belong to any world power". At first the russian troops left Hungary.
Anarchist Revolution?? You people are so silly. It was an anti Jewish uprising. The Communist dictators of the time in Hungary all just so happened to be Jews. Check it for your self. I doubt you will because you anarchists are as thick as pig shit .
@whitelawtowers It was anarchist attribute of the 1956 revolution.For examples the trade unions reserved the factories.And they doped out the from the workers.The workers councils was the main authority.It was the direct democracy.
What corporations these were the common people. If you listen to the description it sound 100% anarchist. My question is where are the fascist are they under the bed those sneaky fascist. If anything atleast present a reference that backs your claim.
That the "communists" of the Russian empire would call Revolutions "fascist" is taken for granted. Nevertheless, after 1956, only hardcore fascists remained in "communist" parties, and now nobody remains in them. Let them dream of their precious gulag: their time has passed.
Amazing that there can be so much historical incorrectness in just 3 minuts:P
And sinds when is the word anarchist the same as fascist? hahaha
Never forget or try to hide it, the revolution of 1956 was an fascist uprising. Of course they had also ordinary people behind them, because Hungaria was infact fascist before the soviet occupation. You do not shake off all fascists tendencies in just 15 years. Not even 60years apparently, just look at the country now;s
Hungary was under soviet opression, nobody asked them to come here and stay. it was not fascist uprising. We wanted independence, freedom. russians and their communist helpers, janos kadar take the goverment after 1956 november. soviets commited mass murders here in WW2 and 1956. what about the life on millions? Fight for FREEDOM! Heroes of '56!
@xiivampire But u accepted the help from the Red Army when they liberated you from the Nazis in WW2 and many soviet troops gave their lives for ur country right ??Unless you are a neo-Nazi..You accepted when the USSR supplied you with oil at low prices right??... It started by a bunch of anarchsit students and the remains of the fascists took advantage of it... American and British officers where training ur so called ''freedom fighters'' from 1954..
@TheRiverman85 The Red army was gaining territory not liberatign anything. I sorry for the russian lives, but dont forget most of the hugnarian people didnt wanted them here, who asked them to demolish a whole country, turning into ruins. But at least the hungarian front lasted 6 months to stop that horde. And im not neo nazi never ever call me that.56> at least we had the courage trying to brake out of that soviet system not like the other countries in the east block.
@xiivampire Νο ...they liberated you...The Soviet troops gave their lives to free half Europe from the Nazis and do not try to rewrite history ok??..So did The Communist parties everywhere organised the anti -Nazi resistance and the Partizans in WW2...The former Socialist countries bacame again capitalist and look at them now...Struggling from being bankrupt
@TheRiverman85 i really dont hope you will see or feel what is a libaration by a russian army ;) you would talk differently if ur country would suffer so much in ww2 by soviets, and anfter ww2 also again by the soviets. as i know greece was part of the ottoman turk empire for 4-500years... was it libaration for u? i think no, just an empire gaining territory. and you would say those ppl in hungary or greece who were fighting against the ottoman oppression were anarchists? :)
@xiivampire Well perhaps some guys wanted to stay under the Nazi influence... Greece was under Nazi inlfuence as well..and the peole starved to death...They were people who joined the Nazis to avoid suffering.. Perhaps those people in hungary were thinking the same way so they wanted to take advantage of an upsirisng.. But first define what Revolution means to you then we talk again... When you are saying about suffering in WW2 by soviets,,, I think the Nazis were saying these ...sorry..
@TheRiverman85 well, if u look on the map, Hungarys geographical situation is quite hard between east and west. and let me add, that not the nazis were saying that, i saw with my own eyes what remained after soviets, and u know my elderly family members were telling tories, and none of them were wearing arrow cross. Why cant u accecpt that a the invading red army was CAPTURING the country and the capital, just search a russian medal of CAPTURING budapest. soviet system=death of million in eastEU
@TheRiverman85 well, if u look on the map, Hungarys geographical situation is quite hard between east and west. and let me add, that not the nazis were saying that, i saw with my own eyes what remained after soviets, and u know my elderly family members were telling tories, and none of them were wearing arrow cross. Why cant u accecpt that a the invading red army was CAPTURING the country and the capital, just search a russian medal of CAPTURING budapest. soviet system=death of million in eastEU
@xiivampire Accept the fact that Hungary owes freedom thanks to the Soviet Army.. The history is one and it is written by the People... Officers from the west were traiing troops for the so called revolution from 1954 !!and some of the ''victims'' the Nazi Iron Cross was found on them..??what do you say for this.??
@TheRiverman85 what do i say? nice oviet propaganda. why dont u accpet, that THE PEOPLE wanted to get rid of this tyrannic system, who killed 40million ukrain, thousands of deported hungarians, burnt and looted country, brainwashing, etc. is this liberation in your terms? i dont know why do u want to make me accpet crime against humanity = soviet system. and what about the ottomans in greece from the 14th century till the 19th century.. Thessaloniki gained its freedom around 1820's,am i right?
@xiivampire those facts were not said by the soviets..? Newspapers and sources from the west comfirmed that...The ''France Soir'' and the Allen Dales from the US spy angency said that the ''upsrising'' was led by fasicsts who were emerged by Imre Nagi!! British officers were traiing those idividuals from 1954 so the Americans new for the uprising...
@xiivampire I presume you are a nationalist like the ones we have here ...but u never mention anything about the Nazi occupation in Hungary..??Were they better ??And if you say that u had a teribble era with the soviets why do you have still around 250 Soviets sites of the unknown soldiers around Budapest?
@TheRiverman85 nationalist.. what is nationalist in your means? the main topic was the soviets and 1956, not the nayi occupation, am i right? nazis were no better, they killed many ppl, just like soviets. so who is better?or u think ones sides were better? yes its a shame we have 250 soviet ites, but u know, those innocent and brainwashed ppl who ent to certain death here, needs remembering, even if me personally doesnt like those sites. and u know there are hungarian sited in russia too..
@TheRiverman85 on teh other hand soviet needed those sites, because they lost many battles, and lives here, both in 44-45 and 56... 1 million soviet troop entered hungary in 44 when rumania changed sides... pretty impressive number, but loosing 200.000 of them is also massive... and just to know russia entered hungary in 56 with 200 tanks... pretty big number, and it shows the weight of the situation... not just bunch of anarchists running on the streets...
@xiivampire You do not seem bothered with the Nazi occupation though and their crimes...It seems it was a big mistake for Stalin to let the remains of Fascism live after the war... and Imre Nagi freed them afterwards..fortunately he got excecuted..he made his bed now he sleeps in it..
@TheRiverman85 i finish the argument, i dont need a greek to tell me what was our uprising. probably you will know less anytime, than me about this topic. have a nice day.
@Lycan87 yes ''they'' are compalining about the ''invasion'' by the Soviets and NONE of them compalins about the Nazi parades on the streets nowadays (Jobbik 2010??) They are the same people and they're children..the facists had a leading role encouranged by Imre Nagi..Even the west prees of that time comfirms it but of course they are not that stupid to reveal the truth..Only the remains of the fascists say about the butality of the Red army in WW2.Yes brutality to those who deserved it
Anarchist are idiots. Human Nature will ALWAYS, ALWAYS destroy Anarchism...always. Unless you are heavy handed. To have an Anarchist society you would have to kill millions of your own citizens. You would have to have strict mind control to make sure that NO Capitalist thought would enter. The Anarchist society would be extremely poor and other stronger 'societies' would attack it, like Islamic thought and destroy it. Anarchy is a tool for bored rich 'kids' who live in the Capitalist countries.
Organizing worker counicls and demanding social and economical equality sounds socialist to me. The uprising was against soviet imperialism and state-capitalismen, not against communism itself.
I can imagine there wasn't a single anarchist anywhere in Hungary in 1956, yet anarchists still claim the revolution was anarchist? How could you have an anarchist revolution without any anarchists? What does that say about anarchism? I liked anarchism until I realized how empty it was. Anarchists seem content to do nothing but cry oppression. Where is your theory? You don't have one. It's a shame, anarchism has potential, but all it's produced is a dull moralism and phraseology.
I clearly stated that this revolution was NOT organized by anarchists in the most part, i just all it anarchist because it has alot of anarchist characteristics. Next time you watch a video try and watch it through the end
youu said you like anarchism untill you realised how empty it was. Well it is not empty, there is an anarchist theory. If someone doesnt like reading though i admit that will have false impressions upon anarchism mainly because most countries dont have anarchist movements or at least serious anarchists. WE do not cry oppressions we have proposals and solutions. Actually my next project is going to be about the anarchist theory
these democrats will never be as savage as the soviets who repressed anarchists in ukraine and russia killing and purging makhno and his comrades . Not that the savage soviets are worse than the USa government who represed anarchists during the beggining of the 20th century
Hmmmm I wonder why the west so strongly supported "this government of workers councils" (Soviets in other words) if that is in fact what they were as you say? And why would workers fighting for such a government place Lenins picture next to a head bayoneted to the ground? Those Hungarians were fighting for Marxism-Leninism but hated Lenin?????
According to your movie, Western countries were supporting Marxism-Leninism and workers fighting for a government of Hungarian Soviets but who actually hated Lenin....
Frankly speaking, I think you have lost your mind!
I did not say that the workers were fighting for marxism-leninism. The revolution was a reaction to Soviet oppression. Maybe thats why t failed to succede(apart from the soviet repression). The fact that this revolution could not be a wester cospiracy derives from the numbers of the revolutionaries. We are talking about hunderds of thousants of people.
Hmmm so it was "a government of workers councils" (Hungarian Soviets in other words) but they werent fighting for Marxism-Leninism? Hundreds of thousands of workers took uop arms against the Soviets, fought off one Soviet Army and then fought another to a standstill yet, even the fascists themselves admit only about 4000 people were killled??? I think you are a deluded idiot!
Of course they weren't! Marxist Leninism is hostile to worker councils, they interfere with the command and control economy, and often place the needs of local workers above the Vanguards long term plans for geopolitical empire building and Marxist modernisation. Marxist-Leninists destroyed communes in Spain, and had the original soviets marginalised.
the west did not support the revolution. It rather used it as propaganda against the Soviet union. There were not any western agents involved. Only common people struggling for freedom ,democracy and prosperity
if one day those democrats nail your democratic head with a democratic bayonette on the democratic ground, maybe that day you will learn appreciate "soviet tyranny"
But after the Suez Channel conflict also started, the world shifted their attention to that conflict. That gave the Sovietunion the chance to quickly take Hungary back. They had to be quick about it, because the americans used the hungarian revolution as propaganda against the Sovietunion, showing the world how the communists massacering the people of Hungary, who are fighting for freedom and independence. The red army used as many tanks to crush the revolution as Germany used in all of WW2.
Metallion69 1 year ago
Let set things straight! This was a fight for freedom. Hungary wanted to detach themselfs from the soviet communist block and wanted all of the red army troops leave, that occupied the country. In his radio speech Imre Nagy said "Hungary wishes to live in piece with it's neighbors, including the Sovietunion and all of the countries of the world. Hungary wishes to stay neutral and don't wan't to belong to any world power". At first the russian troops left Hungary.
Metallion69 1 year ago
Anarchist Revolution?? You people are so silly. It was an anti Jewish uprising. The Communist dictators of the time in Hungary all just so happened to be Jews. Check it for your self. I doubt you will because you anarchists are as thick as pig shit .
whitelawtowers 1 year ago
@whitelawtowers It was anarchist attribute of the 1956 revolution.For examples the trade unions reserved the factories.And they doped out the from the workers.The workers councils was the main authority.It was the direct democracy.
hunbagira 9 months ago
you fucking comunist who put this fucking video on YouTube and glory great romanian
fotbalistulful 2 years ago
fascist uprising...
alienwatcher93 2 years ago
Anarchism is not Fascism
TauBroadside 2 years ago
this uprising wasn't anarchist, but fascism is often helped (unconsciously?) by anarchists
alienwatcher93 2 years ago
What corporations these were the common people. If you listen to the description it sound 100% anarchist. My question is where are the fascist are they under the bed those sneaky fascist. If anything atleast present a reference that backs your claim.
TauBroadside 2 years ago
That the "communists" of the Russian empire would call Revolutions "fascist" is taken for granted. Nevertheless, after 1956, only hardcore fascists remained in "communist" parties, and now nobody remains in them. Let them dream of their precious gulag: their time has passed.
CornetJoyce 2 years ago
Sound have used a neon green. The red is hard to read.
MurderSoul216 3 years ago
Agg...were to start...
1. Anarchists don't support Stalin.
2. It was anti-USSR revolution, not antifa, fascist, communist, or anything else!
AnarchistSin 3 years ago 5
Ναι lol την ουγγρικη επανασταση την εκαναν εθνικιστες κι οχι μαλακες αναρχικοι.
GBHASGDF 4 years ago
Amazing that there can be so much historical incorrectness in just 3 minuts:P
And sinds when is the word anarchist the same as fascist? hahaha
Never forget or try to hide it, the revolution of 1956 was an fascist uprising. Of course they had also ordinary people behind them, because Hungaria was infact fascist before the soviet occupation. You do not shake off all fascists tendencies in just 15 years. Not even 60years apparently, just look at the country now;s
Lycan87 4 years ago
Hungary was under soviet opression, nobody asked them to come here and stay. it was not fascist uprising. We wanted independence, freedom. russians and their communist helpers, janos kadar take the goverment after 1956 november. soviets commited mass murders here in WW2 and 1956. what about the life on millions? Fight for FREEDOM! Heroes of '56!
xiivampire 3 years ago
@xiivampire But u accepted the help from the Red Army when they liberated you from the Nazis in WW2 and many soviet troops gave their lives for ur country right ??Unless you are a neo-Nazi..You accepted when the USSR supplied you with oil at low prices right??... It started by a bunch of anarchsit students and the remains of the fascists took advantage of it... American and British officers where training ur so called ''freedom fighters'' from 1954..
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 The Red army was gaining territory not liberatign anything. I sorry for the russian lives, but dont forget most of the hugnarian people didnt wanted them here, who asked them to demolish a whole country, turning into ruins. But at least the hungarian front lasted 6 months to stop that horde. And im not neo nazi never ever call me that.56> at least we had the courage trying to brake out of that soviet system not like the other countries in the east block.
xiivampire 1 year ago
@xiivampire Νο ...they liberated you...The Soviet troops gave their lives to free half Europe from the Nazis and do not try to rewrite history ok??..So did The Communist parties everywhere organised the anti -Nazi resistance and the Partizans in WW2...The former Socialist countries bacame again capitalist and look at them now...Struggling from being bankrupt
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 i really dont hope you will see or feel what is a libaration by a russian army ;) you would talk differently if ur country would suffer so much in ww2 by soviets, and anfter ww2 also again by the soviets. as i know greece was part of the ottoman turk empire for 4-500years... was it libaration for u? i think no, just an empire gaining territory. and you would say those ppl in hungary or greece who were fighting against the ottoman oppression were anarchists? :)
xiivampire 1 year ago
@xiivampire Well perhaps some guys wanted to stay under the Nazi influence... Greece was under Nazi inlfuence as well..and the peole starved to death...They were people who joined the Nazis to avoid suffering.. Perhaps those people in hungary were thinking the same way so they wanted to take advantage of an upsirisng.. But first define what Revolution means to you then we talk again... When you are saying about suffering in WW2 by soviets,,, I think the Nazis were saying these ...sorry..
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 well, if u look on the map, Hungarys geographical situation is quite hard between east and west. and let me add, that not the nazis were saying that, i saw with my own eyes what remained after soviets, and u know my elderly family members were telling tories, and none of them were wearing arrow cross. Why cant u accecpt that a the invading red army was CAPTURING the country and the capital, just search a russian medal of CAPTURING budapest. soviet system=death of million in eastEU
xiivampire 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheRiverman85 well, if u look on the map, Hungarys geographical situation is quite hard between east and west. and let me add, that not the nazis were saying that, i saw with my own eyes what remained after soviets, and u know my elderly family members were telling tories, and none of them were wearing arrow cross. Why cant u accecpt that a the invading red army was CAPTURING the country and the capital, just search a russian medal of CAPTURING budapest. soviet system=death of million in eastEU
xiivampire 1 year ago
@xiivampire Accept the fact that Hungary owes freedom thanks to the Soviet Army.. The history is one and it is written by the People... Officers from the west were traiing troops for the so called revolution from 1954 !!and some of the ''victims'' the Nazi Iron Cross was found on them..??what do you say for this.??
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 what do i say? nice oviet propaganda. why dont u accpet, that THE PEOPLE wanted to get rid of this tyrannic system, who killed 40million ukrain, thousands of deported hungarians, burnt and looted country, brainwashing, etc. is this liberation in your terms? i dont know why do u want to make me accpet crime against humanity = soviet system. and what about the ottomans in greece from the 14th century till the 19th century.. Thessaloniki gained its freedom around 1820's,am i right?
xiivampire 1 year ago
@xiivampire those facts were not said by the soviets..? Newspapers and sources from the west comfirmed that...The ''France Soir'' and the Allen Dales from the US spy angency said that the ''upsrising'' was led by fasicsts who were emerged by Imre Nagi!! British officers were traiing those idividuals from 1954 so the Americans new for the uprising...
.thessaloniki liberated in 28th October 1912
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@xiivampire I presume you are a nationalist like the ones we have here ...but u never mention anything about the Nazi occupation in Hungary..??Were they better ??And if you say that u had a teribble era with the soviets why do you have still around 250 Soviets sites of the unknown soldiers around Budapest?
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 nationalist.. what is nationalist in your means? the main topic was the soviets and 1956, not the nayi occupation, am i right? nazis were no better, they killed many ppl, just like soviets. so who is better?or u think ones sides were better? yes its a shame we have 250 soviet ites, but u know, those innocent and brainwashed ppl who ent to certain death here, needs remembering, even if me personally doesnt like those sites. and u know there are hungarian sited in russia too..
xiivampire 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 on teh other hand soviet needed those sites, because they lost many battles, and lives here, both in 44-45 and 56... 1 million soviet troop entered hungary in 44 when rumania changed sides... pretty impressive number, but loosing 200.000 of them is also massive... and just to know russia entered hungary in 56 with 200 tanks... pretty big number, and it shows the weight of the situation... not just bunch of anarchists running on the streets...
xiivampire 1 year ago
@xiivampire You do not seem bothered with the Nazi occupation though and their crimes...It seems it was a big mistake for Stalin to let the remains of Fascism live after the war... and Imre Nagi freed them afterwards..fortunately he got excecuted..he made his bed now he sleeps in it..
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 You do not seem bothered with the soviet occupation and their crimes.
come on man, you only want to hear your wors, and close your ears when your favorite reds come on topic...
xiivampire 1 year ago
@TheRiverman85 i finish the argument, i dont need a greek to tell me what was our uprising. probably you will know less anytime, than me about this topic. have a nice day.
xiivampire 1 year ago
@Lycan87 yes ''they'' are compalining about the ''invasion'' by the Soviets and NONE of them compalins about the Nazi parades on the streets nowadays (Jobbik 2010??) They are the same people and they're children..the facists had a leading role encouranged by Imre Nagi..Even the west prees of that time comfirms it but of course they are not that stupid to reveal the truth..Only the remains of the fascists say about the butality of the Red army in WW2.Yes brutality to those who deserved it
TheRiverman85 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anarchist are idiots. Human Nature will ALWAYS, ALWAYS destroy Anarchism...always. Unless you are heavy handed. To have an Anarchist society you would have to kill millions of your own citizens. You would have to have strict mind control to make sure that NO Capitalist thought would enter. The Anarchist society would be extremely poor and other stronger 'societies' would attack it, like Islamic thought and destroy it. Anarchy is a tool for bored rich 'kids' who live in the Capitalist countries.
tinydancer4u 4 years ago
Organizing worker counicls and demanding social and economical equality sounds socialist to me. The uprising was against soviet imperialism and state-capitalismen, not against communism itself.
Hundpiraten 4 years ago 5
well the soviet union was not state capitalist
it had a socialist planned economy...
it was the politics who were controlled by the bureaucrats the economy WAS socialist
so we see that the workers did not want the economy to be the socialist way but the anarcho-communist way
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
Why the soviet anthem from the Stalin era?????
Please, find other soundtracks people!
Ageoftotalitarianism 4 years ago
haha it is from the stalin era because i could not find anything else on the Net!
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
I can imagine there wasn't a single anarchist anywhere in Hungary in 1956, yet anarchists still claim the revolution was anarchist? How could you have an anarchist revolution without any anarchists? What does that say about anarchism? I liked anarchism until I realized how empty it was. Anarchists seem content to do nothing but cry oppression. Where is your theory? You don't have one. It's a shame, anarchism has potential, but all it's produced is a dull moralism and phraseology.
sweetpotos 4 years ago
I clearly stated that this revolution was NOT organized by anarchists in the most part, i just all it anarchist because it has alot of anarchist characteristics. Next time you watch a video try and watch it through the end
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
youu said you like anarchism untill you realised how empty it was. Well it is not empty, there is an anarchist theory. If someone doesnt like reading though i admit that will have false impressions upon anarchism mainly because most countries dont have anarchist movements or at least serious anarchists. WE do not cry oppressions we have proposals and solutions. Actually my next project is going to be about the anarchist theory
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
these democrats will never be as savage as the soviets who repressed anarchists in ukraine and russia killing and purging makhno and his comrades . Not that the savage soviets are worse than the USa government who represed anarchists during the beggining of the 20th century
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
Hmmmm I wonder why the west so strongly supported "this government of workers councils" (Soviets in other words) if that is in fact what they were as you say? And why would workers fighting for such a government place Lenins picture next to a head bayoneted to the ground? Those Hungarians were fighting for Marxism-Leninism but hated Lenin?????
reyter2007 4 years ago
According to your movie, Western countries were supporting Marxism-Leninism and workers fighting for a government of Hungarian Soviets but who actually hated Lenin....
Frankly speaking, I think you have lost your mind!
reyter2007 4 years ago
I did not say that the workers were fighting for marxism-leninism. The revolution was a reaction to Soviet oppression. Maybe thats why t failed to succede(apart from the soviet repression). The fact that this revolution could not be a wester cospiracy derives from the numbers of the revolutionaries. We are talking about hunderds of thousants of people.
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
Hmmm so it was "a government of workers councils" (Hungarian Soviets in other words) but they werent fighting for Marxism-Leninism? Hundreds of thousands of workers took uop arms against the Soviets, fought off one Soviet Army and then fought another to a standstill yet, even the fascists themselves admit only about 4000 people were killled??? I think you are a deluded idiot!
reyter2007 4 years ago
Of course they weren't! Marxist Leninism is hostile to worker councils, they interfere with the command and control economy, and often place the needs of local workers above the Vanguards long term plans for geopolitical empire building and Marxist modernisation. Marxist-Leninists destroyed communes in Spain, and had the original soviets marginalised.
Ageoftotalitarianism 4 years ago
the west did not support the revolution. It rather used it as propaganda against the Soviet union. There were not any western agents involved. Only common people struggling for freedom ,democracy and prosperity
KropotkinPeter 4 years ago
if one day those democrats nail your democratic head with a democratic bayonette on the democratic ground, maybe that day you will learn appreciate "soviet tyranny"
panosfidis 4 years ago