Here's Camille Paglia on the scene from The Birds:
"Like Furies, the crows harass the children from behind, nipping their necks and cheeks, as we seem to slide helplessly backward downhill, with the mob about to trample us. There's a tremendous noise of mingled screams and raucous bird cries. After the first flash of real horror, I generally settle down to laughing and applauding the crows, whom I regard as Coleridgean emissaries vandalizing sentimental Wordsworthian notions of childhood."
Thanks so much for posting these clips. DIck Cavet is who he is. He managed to get some good responses to the questions. You can tell Mr. Hitchcock enjoys revealing his little trade secrets. well done.
The interviewer talks to Hitchcock like if he's an idiot although he's one of the best filmmakers of all history. If i was interviewing Hitchcock I wouldn't ask him about they trained some freaking birds
He's the greatest director of all history and for some reason he's also hilarious. Everytime he talks I crack up, I'm not making fun of him... I'm just saying
I remember watching "The Birds" in Media class at school ,then later after I got of the bus at home there were about 30-40 crows sitting on the power lines.That freaked me out a bit.
@ptboat67 Yeah but what generation are we talking about? I think that's the problem. There was an enormous generation gap problem during that time. There were squares and hip people. The kids were all hip. The old people were all square. The problem was for people like him, I think, who _wanted_ to be hip, but couldn't do it, or worse, and this is what I think, they wanted to be hip but were AFRAID TO because they were too scared: Mike Douglas, Dick Cavett. (cont'd)
@greg5566 Cavett is something here and trying to maintain a line between erudition and the casual establishment wariness that shows he's still hip and young, which is pretty typical at that age. The show format was sophisticated, even in this period, and he wants to maintain that level even though he's of an age where he appreciates and is even star struck by his guests. This is obvious with Betty Davis, but he tries to maintain a sang froid in order to mask it and shift the focus.
@greg5566@greg5566 Cavett is something here and trying to maintain a line between erudition and the casual establishment wariness that shows he's still hip and young, which is pretty typical at that age. The show format was sophisticated, even in this period, and he wants to maintain that level even though he's of an age where he appreciates and is even star struck by his guests. This is obvious with Betty Davis, but he tries to maintain a sang froid in order to mask it and shift the focus.
@ptboat67 Compare him to Dan Rowan and Dick Martin. Those two were cool through and through, even though they were 20 years older than the cast of the show. I think Rowan and Martin were fashionable cool-but-square for their time. Cavett I'm not so sure about.
@greg5566 Rowan and Martin were working in a completely different genre, plus they're 12 years older than Cavett which gives them a whole different perspective on life. It also gives them a daddy like appearance when dealing with the "kids" on the show. The format, here, is that they are part of the older set, but let the cool, hip kids take over to let the silliness ensue. Honestly, though, I think Laugh In was completely safe and gives us far less now than the Cavett interviews.
@ptboat67 Where did "safe" come from? Laugh-in was on national TV, just like this show (and Mike Douglas). It gives them a daddy-like appearance, yes--you're saying things that are true as though they are relevant, but they're not. The much simpler point is that Rown and Martin, e.g., were ENTERTAINING while this guy is unbearable.
@greg5566 That's where you and I are of opposite opinion. I find Laugh in to be unbearably jejune and juvenile. Cavett used an interview style that, especially in the longer format, allowed the subject to reveal themselves in a casual conversation that removed the person from the persona. It's a rare talent and these are the best interviews that we have of some of these "golden age" celebrities. Certainly, Cavett has some annoying traits, which I outlined, but I cannot deny his contribution
@ptboat67 If that's what Cavett did, I accept that. I've never seen the show, I only know that every clip I've ever seen, like this one, is utterly humorless even when he's talking to a comedian. I would also question the validity of praising his because these are the "best" interviews we have of these people. They are the ONLY interviews. (I mean there were not more than a handful of talk shows then--"best" is very faint praise.)
Laugh in is hilarious. Jejune and juvenile are not criticisms.
@greg5566 Respectfully, they are not the only interviews of these people. Many lived into the seventies, 80s, and 90s. They were interviewed during the fifties and sixties, according to the style, and the ones who survived were interviewed later. Cavett's style was ground breaking and brilliant. One reason that we cannot get more of this kind of commentary from our more intelligent or modern veteran celebrities is that either the style has changed or he interviewer is too self absorbed.
Guess I stand corrected in my comment. Times were different then and obviously I was unaware of Dick's way of interviewing :-) Having said that, I don't believe that a similar interview could be repeated today with much success...
he's interviewed George Harrison, John lennon and Jimi hendrix. He was one of the only talk show host at that time who was even remotely politically involved,
That's dick cavett and I never really liked him either, he's kind of annoying, but he plays milktoast to make his guests look good which is why guests liked to go on his show.
I hate the way he shuts them off and goes 'We'll be back after the break'.
Well thats a stupid thing to hate really.
I really mean that I would rather the interviewer didnt speak, and just let both Welles and Hitchcock speak , but then of course, there would be no interview....
I think Hitchcock was a superb expert when it came to dealing with talk show hosts and everything else for that matter...I really LOVED his daughters acting and wish she had done more acting...I wonder what she is doing or if she is still around...seems like I remember when he died reading some comments from her that she is living in her home country of Britian?
Rear window, a wonderful movie which can make me fall asleep like a baby... he has a gift of making a film personal, although many today can create an exciting movie, he has a way of making them personal.
Relying on "technology" would have been a detriment not an advantage. He was of his time and I don't share your sentiment at all. It's like wishing Shakespeare was alive today so he could write for Sex in the City. Give me a break. The soul of a time inhabits an artist. Hitchcock would not be Hitchcock if he began his career in the 70s. Besides, he *allowed* for a certain affected quality to his sets - he would not have exactly appreciated the perfect verisimilitude of CGI.
"It's like wishing Shakespeare was alive today so he could write for Sex in the City", um, that's a bit of a stretch. The difference between the two is writing talent, not technology.
When used in the hands of a competent and visionary director, modern film techniques can greatly enhance the experience. There's no doubt to me that Hitchcock would've embraced it in a big way. Don't forget that Hitch always made the most of the 'technology' available to him at the time and tried to push it.
Also, I'm not just referring to cgi. I'm referring also to modern cameras, HD, non-linear editing, as well as new lighting and sound techniques. Hitch would've tried any technique to get his canvas perfect. The industry's come a long way not just for cgi, but the entire medium.
Few of us are in any doubt that he would've been able to create some absolute masterworks if he had the benefits filmmakers enjoy today because of himself and people like Kubrick, John Ford, Kurosawa and others.
The Shakespeare comment was about an artist's placement in time; the arrogant notion that our time is somehow more advanced is ridiculous. Hitch and Shakespeare were of their time and thank goodness for it. And please don't make fallacious remarks like, "few of us are in doubt", as if to marginalize my opinion. HD lowers cost, but it wasn't responsible for the avant- in "Inland Empire". Advanced editing techniques are not new and Hitch employed them. Ideas are the crux not a claim to modernity.
Respectfully disagree about The Birds being a dated film...I watched it at the Fox Theater in Fullerton, CA with a full crowd and the suspense and tension is just as poignant as it was then. At the point when Mrs. Brenner discovers the farmer, you can feel/hear the crowd gasp at the split second image on the screen...just one of many good moments and a good movie to watch for any era.
haha wow i live in la mirada CA : )... but anyways youre probably right. I normally have no problems getting into old film, but i just couldnt get over some of the elements of this film. Although I will say so of the special effects are mind blowing!
at one part, he mentions having a dinner party and dying all of the food blue. and then not acknowledging it at all. he really is one of the few people ever filmed who can intentionally make me laugh.
Holy crap!!! Drew brees!!!!
thearmyofgreatness 3 weeks ago
When is this from?
Guyverman01 1 month ago
Alfred Hitchcock is the man!
poetyaright 2 months ago
Here's Camille Paglia on the scene from The Birds:
"Like Furies, the crows harass the children from behind, nipping their necks and cheeks, as we seem to slide helplessly backward downhill, with the mob about to trample us. There's a tremendous noise of mingled screams and raucous bird cries. After the first flash of real horror, I generally settle down to laughing and applauding the crows, whom I regard as Coleridgean emissaries vandalizing sentimental Wordsworthian notions of childhood."
Paglia444 2 months ago
I object to any lauding of Lucas & Spielberg.
It suggests that they might be artists.
bobbygnosis 6 months ago 9
i love hitchcock :-) booo!
takemeamerica 6 months ago
I totally share his opinion on actors, what a relieve to hear someone I respect say the same thing.
stinabeib 6 months ago 2
'There are no lions in the Scottish Highlands',
should have been replied with, ' You see... It works.'
casusbelli15 8 months ago 8
a class act!
JRodFilms 8 months ago
@ConstantineRobbins maybe it's because he IS Hitchcock? herp derp...
SpeedDemon3870 8 months ago
Good thing he didn't live to see those "erectile dysfunction" commercials!
Clay3613 8 months ago 7
This dude does a great Hitchcock.
ConstantineRobbins 9 months ago
It's a shame his films were so universally popular. He might be more respected then!
aerialkate 9 months ago 4
he should have made a horror film about cows....call it...moo
logmein84 10 months ago
is there any chance you could tell me who this interview is with and what day it was aired?
sashylka333 10 months ago
His mother was Irish.
KenfromDublin 11 months ago
He's a genius and he's hilarious. I want to marry him.
The64v 11 months ago
@The64v Bomp, Kill, Marry... Hitchcock, Orson Welles, Elia Kazan?
ConstantineRobbins 9 months ago
Thanks so much for posting these clips. DIck Cavet is who he is. He managed to get some good responses to the questions. You can tell Mr. Hitchcock enjoys revealing his little trade secrets. well done.
edweibe 1 year ago 3
I love his voice!!!
STON3SL1VEMU5IC 1 year ago
The interviewer talks to Hitchcock like if he's an idiot although he's one of the best filmmakers of all history. If i was interviewing Hitchcock I wouldn't ask him about they trained some freaking birds
SonHouse245 1 year ago
The interviewer talks to Hitchcock like if he's an idiot although he's one of the best filmmakers of all history
SonHouse245 1 year ago
He's the greatest director of all history and for some reason he's also hilarious. Everytime he talks I crack up, I'm not making fun of him... I'm just saying
SonHouse245 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dick Cavett is about as funny as Conan O'Brien...which is to say, not at all.
Sheldonwh 1 year ago
i quoted "All breasts sag eventually" in an essay for school
GhettoBlaster100 1 year ago 6
"All breasts sag eventually!"
WWE09FAN 1 year ago 14
great filmmaker, even greater jowls
jmlbloom 1 year ago 4
@jmlbloom - Ha!
ScotlandMy 1 year ago
every guy movie has a mcgoffen, i just didnt know it had a name.
dgb751 1 year ago
his voice reminds me Winston Churchill
MrPpavlouk 1 year ago
man i saw bird in 3D at Universal......scared the crap outta me lol
invaderpink 1 year ago
4 people were traumatized by Psycho
dynasta34 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mc'Donalds just came out with a new Hamburger called the McJackson,, It's 50 year old meat between to 12 year old Buns
ShananagansOnYou 1 year ago
Man, that scene from "The Birds" still gives me the willies!
racookster 1 year ago
Alfred Hitchcock's real name Alfred Horowitz
ShananagansOnYou 1 year ago
@ShananagansOnYou His last name was not Horowitz.
tbtbtor 1 year ago
@tbtbtor
It was Alfred Rosenberg
ShananagansOnYou 1 year ago
Seeing the clip, I think "my we certainly are spoiled for special effects nowadays!" ...But what I really wanted to see is the laxative commercial!
Aeschylus 1 year ago
What's the box of tissues for? Spontaneous weeping about the carpet? :)
strangersound 1 year ago
to the 4 who disliked it... go to hell.
johnhamilton08 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how dare churchill talk about christian civilization? what a racist.
britain is a multicultural nation.
bigscolari 1 year ago
I remember watching "The Birds" in Media class at school ,then later after I got of the bus at home there were about 30-40 crows sitting on the power lines.That freaked me out a bit.
QwertnotQuark 1 year ago
It's impossible to watch this man with a strait face! I was laughing the whole time!
Nergaladdictchic 1 year ago
hitchcock never laugh at his jokes, only makes a slight smile
riffbaama 1 year ago
What a fucking douchebag Dick Cavett is. I fucking hate it when the interviewer has utterly no sense of humor.
greg5566 1 year ago 4
@greg5566 To me, he's absolutely represents the fashionable behavior of his generation at the time.
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 Yeah but what generation are we talking about? I think that's the problem. There was an enormous generation gap problem during that time. There were squares and hip people. The kids were all hip. The old people were all square. The problem was for people like him, I think, who _wanted_ to be hip, but couldn't do it, or worse, and this is what I think, they wanted to be hip but were AFRAID TO because they were too scared: Mike Douglas, Dick Cavett. (cont'd)
greg5566 1 year ago
@greg5566 Cavett is something here and trying to maintain a line between erudition and the casual establishment wariness that shows he's still hip and young, which is pretty typical at that age. The show format was sophisticated, even in this period, and he wants to maintain that level even though he's of an age where he appreciates and is even star struck by his guests. This is obvious with Betty Davis, but he tries to maintain a sang froid in order to mask it and shift the focus.
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 *30-something
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 Maybe, or maybe he just sucks. It's such a fine line between being completely unentertaining, and being brilliant but masking it.
greg5566 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greg5566 @greg5566 Cavett is something here and trying to maintain a line between erudition and the casual establishment wariness that shows he's still hip and young, which is pretty typical at that age. The show format was sophisticated, even in this period, and he wants to maintain that level even though he's of an age where he appreciates and is even star struck by his guests. This is obvious with Betty Davis, but he tries to maintain a sang froid in order to mask it and shift the focus.
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 Compare him to Dan Rowan and Dick Martin. Those two were cool through and through, even though they were 20 years older than the cast of the show. I think Rowan and Martin were fashionable cool-but-square for their time. Cavett I'm not so sure about.
greg5566 1 year ago
@greg5566 Rowan and Martin were working in a completely different genre, plus they're 12 years older than Cavett which gives them a whole different perspective on life. It also gives them a daddy like appearance when dealing with the "kids" on the show. The format, here, is that they are part of the older set, but let the cool, hip kids take over to let the silliness ensue. Honestly, though, I think Laugh In was completely safe and gives us far less now than the Cavett interviews.
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 Where did "safe" come from? Laugh-in was on national TV, just like this show (and Mike Douglas). It gives them a daddy-like appearance, yes--you're saying things that are true as though they are relevant, but they're not. The much simpler point is that Rown and Martin, e.g., were ENTERTAINING while this guy is unbearable.
greg5566 1 year ago
@greg5566 That's where you and I are of opposite opinion. I find Laugh in to be unbearably jejune and juvenile. Cavett used an interview style that, especially in the longer format, allowed the subject to reveal themselves in a casual conversation that removed the person from the persona. It's a rare talent and these are the best interviews that we have of some of these "golden age" celebrities. Certainly, Cavett has some annoying traits, which I outlined, but I cannot deny his contribution
ptboat67 1 year ago
@ptboat67 If that's what Cavett did, I accept that. I've never seen the show, I only know that every clip I've ever seen, like this one, is utterly humorless even when he's talking to a comedian. I would also question the validity of praising his because these are the "best" interviews we have of these people. They are the ONLY interviews. (I mean there were not more than a handful of talk shows then--"best" is very faint praise.)
Laugh in is hilarious. Jejune and juvenile are not criticisms.
greg5566 1 year ago
@greg5566 Respectfully, they are not the only interviews of these people. Many lived into the seventies, 80s, and 90s. They were interviewed during the fifties and sixties, according to the style, and the ones who survived were interviewed later. Cavett's style was ground breaking and brilliant. One reason that we cannot get more of this kind of commentary from our more intelligent or modern veteran celebrities is that either the style has changed or he interviewer is too self absorbed.
ptboat67 1 year ago
The greatest of them all!
anniechristien 1 year ago
Most of the children who were running away from the birds were laughing (not a very good thing when they are supposed to be afraid).
globe255 1 year ago
Is it me or does Alfred Hitchcock'c hands look ghostly white?
DessertDivaFL 1 year ago
Warning: probably bad English: What year is this from?
Banatterie 1 year ago
@Banatterie
June 8 1972
sky0725 1 year ago
Mac Guffin is a trick . . . the think is very important for the people in the film... its an element only for the story in the film...
andreasjacke 1 year ago
Hitchcock never fails to amuse me. A very clever man and a one of a kind filmmaker.
vittoriostoraro 1 year ago 5
just realised that the birds had a big influence on the zombie genre
MadCircle01 1 year ago 4
Hitch liked blondes and used them in his movies; heard he thought blondes made the best victims.
calalilygirl 1 year ago
It's akin to a magician's misdirection(uranium was one of them in Hitch's macguffins) LOL!
damone77 1 year ago
Has he ever done an audiobook? It would make me very happy.
LucyLizard87 1 year ago 7
Mr. Hitchcock could recite the alphabet and have everyone in attendance wondering how it's going to end.
garciare1 1 year ago 279
@garciare1 ... Great quote!
tomandsuehunter1 1 year ago
@garciare1 perfectly put!!!
looloorex 1 year ago
@garciare1 LOL I love that! and its true!!!!
RatGirl1987 1 year ago
@garciare1 lol
creepyfreak88 4 months ago
Guess I stand corrected in my comment. Times were different then and obviously I was unaware of Dick's way of interviewing :-) Having said that, I don't believe that a similar interview could be repeated today with much success...
Havhestur 1 year ago
Cavett's a genius...
johnsmdm 1 year ago
His voice. Unmisstakable.
anton1990 2 years ago 6
who is this host? He is clearly not in Alfred's league. Saw his interview with Orson and there, too, the host is so inferior to the brilliant guest.
Havhestur 2 years ago
he's interviewed George Harrison, John lennon and Jimi hendrix. He was one of the only talk show host at that time who was even remotely politically involved,
ledZeppelin7680 2 years ago 6
Really? It's Dick Cavett, and he feigns inferiority in order to give his guests room to maneuver.
infinitefathom 1 year ago 8
That's dick cavett and I never really liked him either, he's kind of annoying, but he plays milktoast to make his guests look good which is why guests liked to go on his show.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
I hate the way he shuts them off and goes 'We'll be back after the break'.
Well thats a stupid thing to hate really.
I really mean that I would rather the interviewer didnt speak, and just let both Welles and Hitchcock speak , but then of course, there would be no interview....
pant1979 1 year ago
He fell out with Tippi after Marnie, which is why he refers to her scornfully here as "the girl".
SNKTHX2000 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this dick cavett is a rubbish talk show host.
dargay 2 years ago
He is such a cutie lol
trosman5 2 years ago 4
Tippi was my fav Alfred girl ~
markmustb1 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
GEVMM 2 years ago
if the link is on your petition, where the hell do i find the petition to click on the link?
taleofrevenge 2 years ago
I meant to say 'profile', sorry. The link is on my profile, not 'petition'.
GEVMM 2 years ago
Hitchcock truly was a brilliant man.
MartinsRulez 2 years ago 8
This demonstrates Hitchcock's influence on directors like Lucas, Spielberg and Tarantino.
jksonny 2 years ago 17
I think Hitchcock was a superb expert when it came to dealing with talk show hosts and everything else for that matter...I really LOVED his daughters acting and wish she had done more acting...I wonder what she is doing or if she is still around...seems like I remember when he died reading some comments from her that she is living in her home country of Britian?
correct me please if I am wrong....
bettypro 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
That yank is a fucking smart ass cunt. What a tit.
bullettoothburrows 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the host always seemed to me like a smartass haha
Arod006enforcer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes, Dick Cavett always struck me that way.
229095 2 years ago
Comment removed
sjpc33 2 years ago
Irony: being an asshole as you show your ignorance by generalizing an ENTIRE NATION for being assholes.
GozerGozarian 2 years ago 7
it's funny cause it's true
sjpc33 2 years ago
Well, we can almost certainly say it is a majority.
goodtaxidriver 2 years ago
Got your dig in, didn't you?
Way to generalize about a multi-million population to one example...which is false anyway.
You are mistaking wit for manners.
METROGNOME57 2 years ago 3
Rear window, a wonderful movie which can make me fall asleep like a baby... he has a gift of making a film personal, although many today can create an exciting movie, he has a way of making them personal.
fck2342 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cavett is the worst.
billheartyface 2 years ago
he's the father of cinema
speechpessi 2 years ago 10
He's the father of storytelling, not cinema.
Alkhir69 2 years ago 7
Hitchcock must have thought that interviewer was such an arse.
gnamp 2 years ago 4
"What psychology do you use on a seagull?"
"...birdseed."
iamqqqqqqq 2 years ago 94
Loads of thumpsups I mean
for yr comment
Rightfully so
ausendundeinenacht 2 years ago 2
@iamqqqqqqq lmfao
looloorex 1 year ago
all breasts sag, aww hitch.
80stimeagain 2 years ago 3
long live the master of suspense!!!
sks409 3 years ago 3
We can only wonder the sorts of films Hitch would've been able to produce with today's technology. Like Kubrick, we'll sadly never know.
(And Tippi Hedren was smokin' in The Birds)
donstuie 3 years ago 12
too true
OmegaGraham 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
OrphanSeasun 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Relying on "technology" would have been a detriment not an advantage. He was of his time and I don't share your sentiment at all. It's like wishing Shakespeare was alive today so he could write for Sex in the City. Give me a break. The soul of a time inhabits an artist. Hitchcock would not be Hitchcock if he began his career in the 70s. Besides, he *allowed* for a certain affected quality to his sets - he would not have exactly appreciated the perfect verisimilitude of CGI.
OrphanSeasun 2 years ago
"It's like wishing Shakespeare was alive today so he could write for Sex in the City", um, that's a bit of a stretch. The difference between the two is writing talent, not technology.
When used in the hands of a competent and visionary director, modern film techniques can greatly enhance the experience. There's no doubt to me that Hitchcock would've embraced it in a big way. Don't forget that Hitch always made the most of the 'technology' available to him at the time and tried to push it.
donstuie 2 years ago
Also, I'm not just referring to cgi. I'm referring also to modern cameras, HD, non-linear editing, as well as new lighting and sound techniques. Hitch would've tried any technique to get his canvas perfect. The industry's come a long way not just for cgi, but the entire medium.
Few of us are in any doubt that he would've been able to create some absolute masterworks if he had the benefits filmmakers enjoy today because of himself and people like Kubrick, John Ford, Kurosawa and others.
donstuie 2 years ago
The Shakespeare comment was about an artist's placement in time; the arrogant notion that our time is somehow more advanced is ridiculous. Hitch and Shakespeare were of their time and thank goodness for it. And please don't make fallacious remarks like, "few of us are in doubt", as if to marginalize my opinion. HD lowers cost, but it wasn't responsible for the avant- in "Inland Empire". Advanced editing techniques are not new and Hitch employed them. Ideas are the crux not a claim to modernity.
OrphanSeasun 2 years ago
My mistake - I meant digital video not HD. Anyway, you're certainly allowed your opinion and believe it or not I share some of it. Peace.
OrphanSeasun 2 years ago
The fact that there was not very much technology is what makes it so great.
With todays movies, everything is fake and lacking imagination because we can have a computer do it for us.
findjustin 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Gotta love Sir Alfred Hitchprick..!!
camselle 3 years ago
He was Knighted?
patch5129 3 years ago
the birds is my least favorite hitch film.. its sadly become too dated in my opinion : (
bnoon 3 years ago
i love that movie cause its funny of how low tech it is!
grtdthmetal 3 years ago
Respectfully disagree about The Birds being a dated film...I watched it at the Fox Theater in Fullerton, CA with a full crowd and the suspense and tension is just as poignant as it was then. At the point when Mrs. Brenner discovers the farmer, you can feel/hear the crowd gasp at the split second image on the screen...just one of many good moments and a good movie to watch for any era.
maxpower789z 2 years ago 5
haha wow i live in la mirada CA : )... but anyways youre probably right. I normally have no problems getting into old film, but i just couldnt get over some of the elements of this film. Although I will say so of the special effects are mind blowing!
bnoon 2 years ago 2
Birds kinda CHANGES i n Yr perception over the YEARS actually
i intuiyively DISliked it as A Child
Like Van Gogh staring at me fr Reproductions in my CHILDhood
HOWEVER things that IMPACT on you stay LONGER in your mind
Anyone AGREES wiyh me here by any Chance?
ausendundeinenacht 2 years ago
I so agree with you! What a great film. Just re-watched it a few weeks back on TCM! I never tire of it!
SHRINA17 2 years ago 3
"all breasts sag eventually" HAHA Hitchcock homie 4 life! :D
blinkzone1 3 years ago 7
hitchcock was a total pimp. Out takes from his earlier films shows he's got a really perverted sense of humour
MozTS 3 years ago 9
SEEDS!
Sergionewyork 3 years ago
thanks for posting.
when was this recorded?
giardia2 3 years ago
Dick looks like a polite version of willem defore : )
jpsartreny 3 years ago 2
willam dafoe.
CrazyShortsCrew 3 years ago
Willem Dafoe
densomtarhanhar 3 years ago
"All breasts sag eventually" ROFL
Ethaniel82 3 years ago 15
Que tipo grosso. El mas grosso despues de Orson Welles. La persona dig :P
ruloaas 3 years ago
The Master.
NGS712 3 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Fat ass.
3rdhpug 3 years ago
Yeah, but he had more money than you! HAHA
meddetect10 3 years ago 2
nice.
CrazyShortsCrew 3 years ago
Hitchcock was fabulously intelligent and had a wonderful sense of dry humor... it's a joy to get to hear more examples of that humor. :)
HaystackCaldoon 3 years ago 19
at one part, he mentions having a dinner party and dying all of the food blue. and then not acknowledging it at all. he really is one of the few people ever filmed who can intentionally make me laugh.
LTopomcFly 3 years ago 2
BRILLIANT.
illusivep 3 years ago 6
shame he couldnt be alive today , what with the unrestrictive boundries and cgi.
magget16 3 years ago 3
but he could do it without cgi
ThatsGoodTellivision 3 years ago
wtf
ausendundeinenacht 2 years ago
It's such a shame Hitchcock died, he is hilarious despite how he talks and this pwns today's midnight talk shows.
bleachynaruto1 3 years ago 7
"considering the weather over there, I'm surprised" LOL
MRCAB 3 years ago 7
"-or i did 'til you said that..." LOL!
i love this interview!
xravenscroftx 3 years ago
cant believe he was creammated after death
paradeaddict 3 years ago
Listening to him talk is endlessly fascinating.
RespectDiCaprio 3 years ago 13
genuis
bashthebandello 3 years ago 4
man alfreds hands are HUGE!!!!! but so is his genius
noirnoticvibe 4 years ago 14
You know what they say: Big hands, big...talent!
DeanLeonard1 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Bruhahahaha you's stupid...........
noirnoticvibe 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fat guy? Who him? Tarantino?
ArchStantonLives 4 years ago
Please....
pertou 3 years ago 5
hah excellent - good retort by cavett too
djpancake 4 years ago 9