There's more to 9/11 than controlled demolition theories. We need to remember this and focus on other aspects. It's the truth movement, not the controlled demolition movement.
Why no mention of the 9/11 report neglecting to mention the Pakistani ISI's involvement with the attacks? Or how the 9/11 report exonnerated Saudi Arabia? Or how Philip Zelikow had a draft of the report written up before research began? Or how he was a close friend of Condi rice? Google "They Tried to Warn Us", hosted on Historycommons. You will be shocked.
@b07rivera You still believe the Pancake THEORY? It sounds like you are the Conspiracy THEORISTS in this thread. Truthers prefer to subscribe to the LAWS of Physics and Gravity! Start your education here......
watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s
If you can find any Scientific Experiments demonstrating how your THEORY could have possibly happened, quite wasting your time and go argue someone about Obamacare or something else you might have a shot of winning!
in case anyone doesn't know, the rockefellers were behind the construction the the twin towers. i wouldn't be surprised if 9/11 wasn't planned before they were even erected and if so perhaps were designed to fail somehow or were booby trapped in some way.
best video yet i agree with, segrum, its all about the asbestos..... but what do u make of dimitri khalezov who says there were nukes planted under each of the buildings i'm not saying i agree just wondering what other ppl's take is
@GONECRUISING72 I do not follow or believe his theory. It fails scientific observation.It has valid points but it disregards the decending sequence of small explosions we see as each floor blown out. WTC 7 was not blown up in a nuke, it was a good old fashioned implosion. The towers were more technical, explosion and implosion. Why use a mini-nuke when RDX is quieter and much more controlled? I support him because he makes people think about 9/11, and rejects the official story. Nukes? No
@MrWizardWithin Interesting thanks for the heads up. I also want to share something. Look at the way the plane swoops down at 3.58 in this video. Too precise for a big jet with an amateur pilot. That is why they will not show us the plane that hit the pentagon because that plane did something truly unbelievable, swooping down and flying so close to the ground before impact. looking at the precision in this vid, the pentagon strike seems completely feasible. /watch?v=1yA_sf-exvA
@MrWizardWithin I thought that it was only a Mossad operation for a long time. However The US government has to be complicit in the attack. Their air defenses where down on purpose. The US government and the Israeli's have worked together on a false flag operation before= USS Liberty. see the documentary on my channel. The way the second plane swoops down before impact indicates sophisticated remote technology that could not have been sneaked in to the US and installed by undercover mossad alone
the stickin jewish monkeys how can anyone argue this wasnt a inside job? Only the sheeple who blindly follow or there one of these jewish pigs. Peace to all >> but you freakin jewish scum some day the truth will rise and your hides will follow
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
tabletalk33 1 month ago
I just got finished reading the 911 commission report on my kindle, lies, lies lies !
9/11 was an inside job !!!!!!!!!!
MsJoy4ever 2 months ago
I am starting to believe that 911 happened to MASK the taking down of building 7 and the destruction of its content!
DutchsMaria 5 months ago in playlist 911
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was an inside job. it's true..
javabeserk 10 months ago
There's more to 9/11 than controlled demolition theories. We need to remember this and focus on other aspects. It's the truth movement, not the controlled demolition movement.
JonRevere 11 months ago
Why no mention of the 9/11 report neglecting to mention the Pakistani ISI's involvement with the attacks? Or how the 9/11 report exonnerated Saudi Arabia? Or how Philip Zelikow had a draft of the report written up before research began? Or how he was a close friend of Condi rice? Google "They Tried to Warn Us", hosted on Historycommons. You will be shocked.
JonRevere 11 months ago
the debunking 911 dot com website
what do you guys think about this website & its way of debunking your conspiracy theories?
b07rivera 1 year ago
@b07rivera I do not have a conspiracy theory. You think Bin Laden did this? That is a conspiracy theory.
IranContraScumDid911 1 year ago 12
@b07rivera You still believe the Pancake THEORY? It sounds like you are the Conspiracy THEORISTS in this thread. Truthers prefer to subscribe to the LAWS of Physics and Gravity! Start your education here......
watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s
If you can find any Scientific Experiments demonstrating how your THEORY could have possibly happened, quite wasting your time and go argue someone about Obamacare or something else you might have a shot of winning!
Thanks,
Daniel Edd Bland III
bland229 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
in case anyone doesn't know, the rockefellers were behind the construction the the twin towers. i wouldn't be surprised if 9/11 wasn't planned before they were even erected and if so perhaps were designed to fail somehow or were booby trapped in some way.
up2space 1 year ago
Comment removed
up2space 1 year ago
@MrWizardWithin AMDOCs/Odigo for 2.
thechangeling613 1 year ago
best video yet i agree with, segrum, its all about the asbestos..... but what do u make of dimitri khalezov who says there were nukes planted under each of the buildings i'm not saying i agree just wondering what other ppl's take is
GONECRUISING72 1 year ago
@GONECRUISING72 I do not follow or believe his theory. It fails scientific observation.It has valid points but it disregards the decending sequence of small explosions we see as each floor blown out. WTC 7 was not blown up in a nuke, it was a good old fashioned implosion. The towers were more technical, explosion and implosion. Why use a mini-nuke when RDX is quieter and much more controlled? I support him because he makes people think about 9/11, and rejects the official story. Nukes? No
IranContraScumDid911 1 year ago 3
To remove the asbestos up to the 64th floor would have costed Silverstein billions as it only cost 7 million to build the WTC.
segrum 1 year ago 4
Kissinger is scum!
PigMine3 1 year ago 3
Whenever these DC killers & thieves want to hide something they form a comittee then used the manipulated findings as certified evidence.
IceManLikeGervin 1 year ago 2
@MrWizardWithin Interesting thanks for the heads up. I also want to share something. Look at the way the plane swoops down at 3.58 in this video. Too precise for a big jet with an amateur pilot. That is why they will not show us the plane that hit the pentagon because that plane did something truly unbelievable, swooping down and flying so close to the ground before impact. looking at the precision in this vid, the pentagon strike seems completely feasible. /watch?v=1yA_sf-exvA
whereisthejustice1 1 year ago
The Commission needs to be brought up on Charges for:
Conspiracy to Overthrow our Government
Title 18 Section 1918
WulfBand 1 year ago 8
did anyone see the film Executive Decision (1996)?
/watch?v=4Ms91m1bCXQ
CRAPCANNONS 1 year ago
@MrWizardWithin I thought that it was only a Mossad operation for a long time. However The US government has to be complicit in the attack. Their air defenses where down on purpose. The US government and the Israeli's have worked together on a false flag operation before= USS Liberty. see the documentary on my channel. The way the second plane swoops down before impact indicates sophisticated remote technology that could not have been sneaked in to the US and installed by undercover mossad alone
whereisthejustice1 1 year ago 4
the stickin jewish monkeys how can anyone argue this wasnt a inside job? Only the sheeple who blindly follow or there one of these jewish pigs. Peace to all >> but you freakin jewish scum some day the truth will rise and your hides will follow
surfjerr 1 year ago 2