@myspacedrummer Free in the sense that you do not have to pay for it. Energy is still spent to fill it with water even if that energy is generated through natural processes. Like the rain water that filled the lake or stream.
NIce. How efficient is this design? Obviously there is going to be some torque in that size vortex, but doesn't look like a lot of speed. Do you know results from this?
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
@Odziz It is not free energy. It is simply a different way to do hydroelectric power. It is drawing energy off of the motion of the water. If it runs out of water it will stop and it does not put out enough energy to move the water back up to the top faster then if falls through. So the only way to keep it running is to have it be fed by a lake or stream.
@Odziz Unfortunately I am not the one who decided to mix up the words free energy with perpetual motion. 90% of the perpetual motion believers did that. A word means what the majority of people believe it to mean reguadless of what the dictionary has to say about it. Why not just call it a hydroelectric generator?
@MrAwsome514 yes, it is a different way to do hydroelectric power. There is no such thing as perpetual motion and you know this because you realize that "looping" this system would not work. It seems you want to dismiss this machine because it does not realize your impossible fantasy. Grow up, nothing is free in this world. You only build a hydroelectric power plant where there is water traveling down hill. It costs money to build and maintain but the power source costs nothing.
@Indygoguy Idiot... Don't jump into some one else's coversation with out knowing what the context of that conversation is. I do not believe overunity is possible nor do I believe perpetual motion is. Hell I often go on to the channels of those who claim to have produced such machines to expose them for the con artists they are... What I was trying to point out to the man is that there are still maintenance costs on this thing which can be quite expensive.
@Indygoguy In short... grow the fuck up and don't jump in to troll when you have not seen the entire conversation. It will only lead to you putting your foot in your mouth.
@MrAwsome514 why don't YOU grow the fuck up and stop thinking your posts are so brilliant that people are going to go back and read every single obnoxiously boring one you posted. The post I commented on was of you saying something incredibly juvenile and your response just confirms my assessment of you.
@Indygoguy I didn't ask you to go back and read my comments... Meerly to understand the fact that only a small portion of the conversation could be viewed from the front page, and that you don't know the context of the conversation. Why are you responding to year old comments any way?
A project like this needs initial funds to build it, resources to build it, then work to keep it going and eventually, more money and resources to repair it when it eventually breaks down, thus it is not free.
That said, there is expensive energy, and inexpensive energy - And this does look like the inexpensive variant. :)
are you aware that black holes also emit radiation from their poles, and are composed of pure light? Even stranger what if we are in a black hole that is rotating and dragging its interior, giving rise to spiral and helical characteristics to its interior (spin).
A normal hydroelectric power station uses only the fall and hight of the water to generate power, or in a few occasions also the speed of water (as in a river).
A whirlpool however is not powered directly by the fall or height of the water, but actually by the spin of the earth.
This can be proven by letting water flow trough a pipe on the two different hemispheres, as it will reverse its direction.
actually, the power does come from the gravitational potential energy of the falling water. the spin is determined by local factors and the factor of which hemisphere the vortex is being created in has very little effect. however, the law of averages dictates that yes. in two perfect experiments on differing hemisphers would result in opposite spin.
Okey then. But lets just theoretically say that the earth suddenly stopped its spinning, would it still continue to act like a whirlpool, or would it turn into a weird form of straight down-flowing water stream?
fraid not. it would still continue to spin as long as there was a gravitational force. it would just be the local stimulants that would dictate the spin eg, imperfections in the container, random heat caused discriminations etc. in fluid dynamics when enough force is applied to a fluid the reaction is for it to conserve the energy in a vortex as it has no ready way of transforming that energy. this is seen everywhere from wing tip turbulance to tornados to galaxy's
Thats entirely correct. The Coriolis effect which is hemisphere-dependant only affects water bodies of significant mass, such as oceans. Water flowing through a pipe is far more likely to be directed according to how clean the pipe is!
@Nabo00o wow, if that's true, it's amazing, i never knew that, i thought that gravity made everything appear to stand still and that it can't effect motion, is there a video i should watch on this?
@Nabo00o well i don't know the physiology of the transition from liquid to gas, but that's all i know, so i can't know "directly" how the sun lifts the water, but i'm sure it has something to do with gas being lighter than water and air.
Yes, the sun heats the water so that it evaporates and makes it lighter.
What is interesting is that the water can reach a very large height before it again turns into liquid, and then it will also release the same heat that it got from the sun.
The force of gravity is what both makes it fly up and fall down, but the heat from our sun excites that water into a phase change, completely altering the effect of gravity.
Viktor Schauberger isn't widely known for good reason , they don't want to world to know the truth!
That guy became my hero when I learned me and him were very alike , in ways that we looked to nature for our theories on how our universe micro to macro works , along with other things..he also answers many questions that I had on why the ancients "worshiped" certain animals and their structures
This is a great video
TheSpikeystuff 1 week ago
-looking below- damn. some angry people here. -moves along-
DJMC5ive 3 months ago
@DJMC5ive Na... it was just some little punk trying to makje himself feel superior to some one. Ofcourse he failed miserably.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
350MW
37zeus37 4 months ago
has anyone in these comments thought to add this to existing hydroelectric setups? It would make them more efficient probably.
tech5353 5 months ago
@myspacedrummer Free in the sense that you do not have to pay for it. Energy is still spent to fill it with water even if that energy is generated through natural processes. Like the rain water that filled the lake or stream.
MrAwsome514 6 months ago
The unit looks like it isn't very sturdy. How much watts or joules does it harness?
KanineKruizer 6 months ago
So geht das!
superFLOful 7 months ago
this dude copied my dad
BalconyBro 10 months ago
oh i thought its a nuclear power plant... gosh
MrJhomzrobs 10 months ago
NIce. How efficient is this design? Obviously there is going to be some torque in that size vortex, but doesn't look like a lot of speed. Do you know results from this?
HybridWaterMan2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
violafinishda 1 year ago
I'd like to see some generator output driving some load. How much power does this make?
AlternativePowerMan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
porscheghcje 1 year ago
So it is using gravity to create a vortex so the vortex will spin a turbine? brilliant.
even more brilliant if they can loop the water and make it free energy.
THATW3IRDKID 1 year ago
@THATW3IRDKID
It uses the flow of the water source and gravity. If you cascade these down a hill side that's a lot of hydro power.
Yes it is free energy, after the initial build.
Please don't confuse free energy with perpetual motion.
Odziz 1 year ago 4
@Odziz It is not free energy. It is simply a different way to do hydroelectric power. It is drawing energy off of the motion of the water. If it runs out of water it will stop and it does not put out enough energy to move the water back up to the top faster then if falls through. So the only way to keep it running is to have it be fed by a lake or stream.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago 3
@MrAwsome514
Obviously your definition of free energy is different from mine.
Please don't confuse free energy with perpetual motion.
Odziz 1 year ago 2
@Odziz Unfortunately I am not the one who decided to mix up the words free energy with perpetual motion. 90% of the perpetual motion believers did that. A word means what the majority of people believe it to mean reguadless of what the dictionary has to say about it. Why not just call it a hydroelectric generator?
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@Odziz hmm, so what is your definition of free energy then?
ProofScientific 1 year ago
@MrAwsome514 yes, it is a different way to do hydroelectric power. There is no such thing as perpetual motion and you know this because you realize that "looping" this system would not work. It seems you want to dismiss this machine because it does not realize your impossible fantasy. Grow up, nothing is free in this world. You only build a hydroelectric power plant where there is water traveling down hill. It costs money to build and maintain but the power source costs nothing.
Indygoguy 3 months ago
@Indygoguy Idiot... Don't jump into some one else's coversation with out knowing what the context of that conversation is. I do not believe overunity is possible nor do I believe perpetual motion is. Hell I often go on to the channels of those who claim to have produced such machines to expose them for the con artists they are... What I was trying to point out to the man is that there are still maintenance costs on this thing which can be quite expensive.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@Indygoguy In short... grow the fuck up and don't jump in to troll when you have not seen the entire conversation. It will only lead to you putting your foot in your mouth.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@MrAwsome514 why don't YOU grow the fuck up and stop thinking your posts are so brilliant that people are going to go back and read every single obnoxiously boring one you posted. The post I commented on was of you saying something incredibly juvenile and your response just confirms my assessment of you.
Indygoguy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Indygoguy I didn't ask you to go back and read my comments... Meerly to understand the fact that only a small portion of the conversation could be viewed from the front page, and that you don't know the context of the conversation. Why are you responding to year old comments any way?
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@THATW3IRDKID Ain't any such thing, and no, the water HAS to fall, that's where
the energy comes from. If you lift it back up then you would have to do the same
work it produced in falling, and more because of friction. The only free lunch is the
sun, or fusion, if we ever make it work. There is NO "free energy" that comes from
"nowhere".
rstevewarmorycom 6 months ago
Is it perpetual energy?
Xaxton2 1 year ago
@Xaxton2
It is free energy, after the initial build.
Please don't confuse free energy with perpetual motion.
Odziz 1 year ago 2
@Odziz
No such thing as free energy.
A project like this needs initial funds to build it, resources to build it, then work to keep it going and eventually, more money and resources to repair it when it eventually breaks down, thus it is not free.
That said, there is expensive energy, and inexpensive energy - And this does look like the inexpensive variant. :)
Jesus45U 7 months ago
sir issac newton told us why
an apple falls down from the sky
and from this fact its very plain
all other objects do the same
a brick, a bar, a bolt, a cup
invariably fall down not up
applying this regarding water
it falls down like it ought ta...
sniprzkitty 2 years ago
"Claps" :)
lostinseganet 2 years ago
check
martinus . nu
oletherkelsen . dk
mathildenhoehe . org
MartinusThomsen 2 years ago
does it the propeller bend when increase in a surge of water?
rol6711 2 years ago
nice!
rayofminneapolis 2 years ago
i almost fell into one of these as a kid =\
ikonxp 3 years ago 6
Nice he is trying to reinvent the kaplan and francis turbines. Funny I do not see any water to wire efficiencies numbers?
Hornj21 3 years ago 3
@Hornj21 "Funny I do not see any water to wire efficiencies numbers?" i think we have a winning question here
lexichronicle 1 year ago
Sweet.
Now build 50 more! Go!
Flyborg 3 years ago
I wonder if this tech could be used to work with rising hot air?
macrumpton 3 years ago
Yes it can, Google: Solar Tower
cheers
Lindenlc 3 years ago 2
Perhaps it is no surprise that this model resembles one of the most powerful forces in the universe...a black hole.
Black holes don't just suck things directly toward it in all directions, Things spiral into it pretty much as you see here.
I wonder what the flow rate is compared to your typical hydro generator.
ericsinvention 3 years ago
are you aware that black holes also emit radiation from their poles, and are composed of pure light? Even stranger what if we are in a black hole that is rotating and dragging its interior, giving rise to spiral and helical characteristics to its interior (spin).
UFOMAN618 3 years ago
Its weird and mindboggeling ;)
But its very interesting and here is why:
A normal hydroelectric power station uses only the fall and hight of the water to generate power, or in a few occasions also the speed of water (as in a river).
A whirlpool however is not powered directly by the fall or height of the water, but actually by the spin of the earth.
This can be proven by letting water flow trough a pipe on the two different hemispheres, as it will reverse its direction.
Nabo00o 3 years ago
actually, the power does come from the gravitational potential energy of the falling water. the spin is determined by local factors and the factor of which hemisphere the vortex is being created in has very little effect. however, the law of averages dictates that yes. in two perfect experiments on differing hemisphers would result in opposite spin.
lilbenji25 2 years ago
Okey then. But lets just theoretically say that the earth suddenly stopped its spinning, would it still continue to act like a whirlpool, or would it turn into a weird form of straight down-flowing water stream?
Nabo00o 2 years ago
fraid not. it would still continue to spin as long as there was a gravitational force. it would just be the local stimulants that would dictate the spin eg, imperfections in the container, random heat caused discriminations etc. in fluid dynamics when enough force is applied to a fluid the reaction is for it to conserve the energy in a vortex as it has no ready way of transforming that energy. this is seen everywhere from wing tip turbulance to tornados to galaxy's
lilbenji25 2 years ago
Thats entirely correct. The Coriolis effect which is hemisphere-dependant only affects water bodies of significant mass, such as oceans. Water flowing through a pipe is far more likely to be directed according to how clean the pipe is!
spartancroft 2 years ago
@Nabo00o wow, if that's true, it's amazing, i never knew that, i thought that gravity made everything appear to stand still and that it can't effect motion, is there a video i should watch on this?
xxxslayerxxx666 1 year ago
@xxxslayerxxx666
Its a long time since I wrote that and things have changed for me.
I guess you would have liked to read some books about Schauberger, you can easily get them as torrents....
One other thing, a friend one time asked me where the energy to drive our hydroelectric powerstations comes from. It was a riddle....
Nabo00o 1 year ago
@Nabo00o a riddle with no answer? lol.
xxxslayerxxx666 1 year ago
@xxxslayerxxx666
Well yes I answered, but where do you think it comes from?
How directly is the sun actually lifting the water to the top of our hills?
Nabo00o 1 year ago
@Nabo00o well i don't know the physiology of the transition from liquid to gas, but that's all i know, so i can't know "directly" how the sun lifts the water, but i'm sure it has something to do with gas being lighter than water and air.
xxxslayerxxx666 1 year ago
@xxxslayerxxx666
Yes, the sun heats the water so that it evaporates and makes it lighter.
What is interesting is that the water can reach a very large height before it again turns into liquid, and then it will also release the same heat that it got from the sun.
The force of gravity is what both makes it fly up and fall down, but the heat from our sun excites that water into a phase change, completely altering the effect of gravity.
Nabo00o 1 year ago
Viktor Schauberger isn't widely known for good reason , they don't want to world to know the truth!
That guy became my hero when I learned me and him were very alike , in ways that we looked to nature for our theories on how our universe micro to macro works , along with other things..he also answers many questions that I had on why the ancients "worshiped" certain animals and their structures
thanks for the post
sn1pe352 3 years ago
It's really good to see useful application of old technique!
Zotloeterer should reference Viktor Schauberger (1885-1958, Austria ;-), because he was a pioneer in water/vortex technique.
solidarityONE 3 years ago 2
Yes its about time Viktor Schauberger was recognised for the genius he was. Like Thomas Townsend Brown, Nikola Tesla et al.
Odziz 3 years ago
Can you get higher velocities if the blades were smaller in size and held deeper into the vortex's portion that spins faster and narrower?
robfromorlando 3 years ago
WOW, THAT IS AMAZING
MyiahFord 3 years ago
could we get this in english? the zotloterer website is only in the german language..
youarelackluster 4 years ago
If your using Firefox, use the foxlingo extension to translate the webpage
Odziz 4 years ago
GREAT IDEA. SIMPLE AND BRILLIANT!
GREENPOWERSCIENCE 4 years ago
to see a tv report on this technology look at watch?v=3J87lzqMEnI&feature=related on YouTube
Odziz 4 years ago
Awesome!
tribluered 4 years ago