@padawangussin1 The 09 film is just an alternate timeline created by the Narada arriving in the past. The comic tie ins even show the Enterprise- E scanning the other side of the rift just after the ships went through, the original is still there with novels still being written that are set in it.
Please support our Facebook group the enterprise needs a doohan we aim to get enough like so abrams will give Christopher doohan a cameo in star trek (2013)
@padawangussin1 True but G.R. is long dead someone gonna have to take his place so later J.A. took over his legacy work and continued the Trek films. Even he didn't screw up the Trek Universe he screw up the time line.
@padawangussin1 I've heard the exact same thing about other films. New Transformers sucks (made 1 billion) Star trek reboot sucks (Sequal in the works) New Nightmare on elmstreet sucks(Well, two out of three ain't bad). My point is that when ever somebody desides to do something original with what's already established, there's always going to be someone who's going to complain about it. Fans were up in arms when they found out Spock was going to die in Wrath of Kahn. Nothing ever changes.
@GESSO217 "Fans were up in arms when they found out Spock was going to die in Wrath of Kahn" True but no one ever knocked the movie unlike this new crap fest. After I saw The Wrath of Kahn I had the same reaction to it like all other Trekkers "It was a great film but it was not Star Trek because the killed Spock." The new Star Trek, Transformers, and the New Nightmare on Elm Street do suck! They are bad movies! But You like them & that’s OK.
@padawangussin1 Technically, the only cadets-to-ship were Uhura, Kirk and Bones. Even with them, Kirk and Bones were much older than usual cadets (Bones was already a doctor and Kirk had degrees before enlistment). Everyone else was at least a bit experienced; Spock taught at the Academy, Chekov was an attached member of the crew, Sulu-while a replacement-was already in, and Scotty was in the remote post for a bad experiment.
@padawangussin1 I don't think Star Trek universe was destroyed. A new universe was created, a parallel universe was created to explain all changes made. And I think it was very good. Star Trek earned a whole new generation of fans. I, for example. I'm not a big fan, but when I watched Star Trek 2009 I started to want to see the original series.
PS: English isn't my first language, so please forgive any mistake.
How the fuck was that a "brilliant" scene? Where's the acting? Where's the dialogue? Anyone who's impressed by visuals alone has a horrible taste in moves.
What you're ignoring is the quality of the direction itself. No, there was nothing special about the acting. Same story with the script..but let nobody say that J.J. Abrams doesn't know how to direct a movie. This scene is beautifully filmed and directed, and the music makes it that much better. I wasn't the biggest fan of "Star Trek," but it wasn't the fault of the man sitting behind the camera.
@Yaoimonk An okay film, yes. So was Terminator Salvation. They both suffer from 'Acute Not Looking At The Original To See What It's Actually Like Syndrome': The worst disease a sequel/prequel could have.
MrMatisito, I agree it was an OK action movie, but it was poor trek. It was standard action heroes in space with a poor plot that relied on so many obscenely contrived devices it was hard to take it seriously. I failed to do so and watched it as popcorn fare instead. Trek should involve the brain as well as the hormones and it's difficult to see how anyone could argue the film did that. Some halfway decent performances though.
@MrMatisito Star Trek was on the verg of growing stale before Abram's came around. Nemisis failed, ST:Enterprise was canned, the only other option was to start fresh. Sure it was almost completely different than what had come before but that was the whole point.
@thegtawizard I must politely disagree as a Trekkie that loves all the generations and the new one too. It was incredible to see this film and to have my brother and sister-in-law see it and love it too. They saw it in the theaters and unfortunately, I didn't. But what I saw later on DVD blew me away. And this reminds me of the very first Trek film. The Enterprise is Jim's "first best destiny" and always shall be.
This is sad to say, but I freely admit it: I almost cried at this scene in theatres. Seeing that ship brought back so many memories. What an awesome reboot.
If you DIDN'T feel like cheering when you saw this scene, Kirk seeint the fully-built Enterprise, the old NCC-1701--no bloody A, B, C, OR D...or E...or NX-01?--Enterprise...!
EPIC music, epic scene, and it's great to have Trek back!
@obiwanobiwan13 That thing isn't the original Enterprise. She was better looking and belonged to a different universe! She was at her prettiest when she was destroyed in Star Trek III.
@finalfrontier1701 Well, she does have a few interesting features... it's like Scotty told Geordi in "Relics", "Every woman has her charm, you just have to know where to find it." And it looks like they took some of the best features from both the TOS and TMP Enterprises and mashed 'em together. I do like the deflector dish on this Enterprise... and her warp nacelles are interesting. Does anyone else like the connecting dorsal mounted torpedo launcher? Is that a nod to the TMP design, I see?
@padawangussin1 The 09 film is just an alternate timeline created by the Narada arriving in the past. The comic tie ins even show the Enterprise- E scanning the other side of the rift just after the ships went through, the original is still there with novels still being written that are set in it.
danthedoc1 3 days ago
Please support our Facebook group the enterprise needs a doohan we aim to get enough like so abrams will give Christopher doohan a cameo in star trek (2013)
luigi19987 1 month ago
24,000 Euros please.
BillyJimOMFG 1 month ago
Little RICKY !!! MEDIC!
BillyJimOMFG 1 month ago
Oh yes. I've seen that before. They;ve got one of those in Epping Flipton.
BillyJimOMFG 1 month ago
they need to hire nicholas meyer or anyone who can meld a true sci-fi vision with a good story
MrChristmas1976 2 months ago
i do not even consider this the 11th movie of the series
for a movie it was complete bull crap
MrMysticPaladin 2 months ago
I don't think there's enough lens flare in this movie, I hope the next one has more.
pasinurminen2233 2 months ago
0:37 I said the same
AdisloKazdan 2 months ago
The new Star trek completely distroys the Trek Universe
Vulcan gone
Amanda Dead
A ship of cadets getting a ship just out of training
This is what they came up with
padawangussin1 3 months ago 3
@padawangussin1 True but G.R. is long dead someone gonna have to take his place so later J.A. took over his legacy work and continued the Trek films. Even he didn't screw up the Trek Universe he screw up the time line.
SR71ABCD 3 months ago
@padawangussin1 I've heard the exact same thing about other films. New Transformers sucks (made 1 billion) Star trek reboot sucks (Sequal in the works) New Nightmare on elmstreet sucks(Well, two out of three ain't bad). My point is that when ever somebody desides to do something original with what's already established, there's always going to be someone who's going to complain about it. Fans were up in arms when they found out Spock was going to die in Wrath of Kahn. Nothing ever changes.
GESSO217 3 months ago
@GESSO217 "Fans were up in arms when they found out Spock was going to die in Wrath of Kahn" True but no one ever knocked the movie unlike this new crap fest. After I saw The Wrath of Kahn I had the same reaction to it like all other Trekkers "It was a great film but it was not Star Trek because the killed Spock." The new Star Trek, Transformers, and the New Nightmare on Elm Street do suck! They are bad movies! But You like them & that’s OK.
Trekfreek 3 months ago
@padawangussin1 It has merely created an alternate universe. Not destroyed the original.
pupbenny 2 months ago
@pupbenny creating an alternate universe is destroying the original
it is like all we have seen up to now did not really happen in the first place
MrMysticPaladin 2 months ago
@MrMysticPaladin It isn't destroying the other universe because in order for this universe to exist the other universe needs to exist.
pupbenny 2 months ago
@padawangussin1 Technically, the only cadets-to-ship were Uhura, Kirk and Bones. Even with them, Kirk and Bones were much older than usual cadets (Bones was already a doctor and Kirk had degrees before enlistment). Everyone else was at least a bit experienced; Spock taught at the Academy, Chekov was an attached member of the crew, Sulu-while a replacement-was already in, and Scotty was in the remote post for a bad experiment.
ElTee842 2 months ago
@padawangussin1 And in spite of all that.. Kirk's Enterprise remains the biggest and best (albeit totally trashed in this case!)
all13Doctors 1 month ago
@padawangussin1 A life. You need one.
TheRandyChimp 1 month ago
@padawangussin1 Agreed.
Idazmi7 2 weeks ago
@padawangussin1 I don't think Star Trek universe was destroyed. A new universe was created, a parallel universe was created to explain all changes made. And I think it was very good. Star Trek earned a whole new generation of fans. I, for example. I'm not a big fan, but when I watched Star Trek 2009 I started to want to see the original series.
PS: English isn't my first language, so please forgive any mistake.
Maricpia 6 days ago
How the fuck was that a "brilliant" scene? Where's the acting? Where's the dialogue? Anyone who's impressed by visuals alone has a horrible taste in moves.
VitalSigns1 4 months ago
@VitalSigns1
What you're ignoring is the quality of the direction itself. No, there was nothing special about the acting. Same story with the script..but let nobody say that J.J. Abrams doesn't know how to direct a movie. This scene is beautifully filmed and directed, and the music makes it that much better. I wasn't the biggest fan of "Star Trek," but it wasn't the fault of the man sitting behind the camera.
mco119 3 months ago
Whats with the shitty off-screen camera? This isn't 1998.
MrBoBoTom 5 months ago
awful sound quility.
MrBoBoTom 5 months ago
great scene
1701DRAGON 6 months ago
The original shits over this CGI crap. No soul just some fancy camera angles.
Uberdude25 6 months ago
@Uberdude25 I concur completely...stay perceptive and discerning...it works for you.
gandy74 5 months ago
Sure it might not be the best Star Trek ever made in the existance of mankind, but it was an ok movie in my opinion.
Yaoimonk 6 months ago
@Yaoimonk An okay film, yes. So was Terminator Salvation. They both suffer from 'Acute Not Looking At The Original To See What It's Actually Like Syndrome': The worst disease a sequel/prequel could have.
Idazmi7 6 months ago
MrMatisito, I agree it was an OK action movie, but it was poor trek. It was standard action heroes in space with a poor plot that relied on so many obscenely contrived devices it was hard to take it seriously. I failed to do so and watched it as popcorn fare instead. Trek should involve the brain as well as the hormones and it's difficult to see how anyone could argue the film did that. Some halfway decent performances though.
spot261 6 months ago
They should have made the shuttle so much smaller, the ship looks tiny when the shuttle goes into the shuttlebay
Chewy2nd 7 months ago
You can actually see the Enterprise as the shuttles first approach spacedock. It is in the top right corner, closest to the glare from the sun.
supernin10do 7 months ago
I almos crap my pants when i see the New Enterprise.... XD
Pandawan316 7 months ago
"I felt that they should've kept the props more in synch with the TV series: same clothes, same model ship, ect. to make it more authentic!"
MrWINNSLAW 8 months ago
Anyone who doesn't get goosebumbs when the Enterprise appears can't possibly have a heart.
However, I'd still like to see this film made with the TMP era Enterprise... just imagine how they would be with modern special effects.
WilfredIvanhoe 8 months ago
0:30 thats one beautiful lady.
thisisrumorcontrol 8 months ago
"JJ abrams ruined Star Trek?" wow..people really LOVE to complaint!! This was a great fucking epic movie!
MrMatisito 8 months ago
@MrMatisito Star Trek was on the verg of growing stale before Abram's came around. Nemisis failed, ST:Enterprise was canned, the only other option was to start fresh. Sure it was almost completely different than what had come before but that was the whole point.
GESSO217 7 months ago
this movie shoulf be tarred, feathered, and burned! Worst star trek movie ive ever seen!
thegtawizard 9 months ago
@thegtawizard I must politely disagree as a Trekkie that loves all the generations and the new one too. It was incredible to see this film and to have my brother and sister-in-law see it and love it too. They saw it in the theaters and unfortunately, I didn't. But what I saw later on DVD blew me away. And this reminds me of the very first Trek film. The Enterprise is Jim's "first best destiny" and always shall be.
PeachWookiee 5 months ago
JJ Abrams should be killed to death for ruining Star Trek.
TomatoeAssassin 9 months ago
Nothing beats the Enterprise E. She's the Milf of all Starfleet ships.
spoonmonkey14 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Still get chills.
Scorptilicus 9 months ago
This is sad to say, but I freely admit it: I almost cried at this scene in theatres. Seeing that ship brought back so many memories. What an awesome reboot.
GoldenFlither15 9 months ago
......Wow!
smashupdriver 10 months ago
If you DIDN'T feel like cheering when you saw this scene, Kirk seeint the fully-built Enterprise, the old NCC-1701--no bloody A, B, C, OR D...or E...or NX-01?--Enterprise...!
EPIC music, epic scene, and it's great to have Trek back!
obiwanobiwan13 11 months ago 18
@obiwanobiwan13 That thing isn't the original Enterprise. She was better looking and belonged to a different universe! She was at her prettiest when she was destroyed in Star Trek III.
terrywest111 10 months ago
@terrywest111 Agreed...but IMHO, this Enterprise is beautiful as well...in her own way.
finalfrontier1701 9 months ago
@finalfrontier1701 Well, she does have a few interesting features... it's like Scotty told Geordi in "Relics", "Every woman has her charm, you just have to know where to find it." And it looks like they took some of the best features from both the TOS and TMP Enterprises and mashed 'em together. I do like the deflector dish on this Enterprise... and her warp nacelles are interesting. Does anyone else like the connecting dorsal mounted torpedo launcher? Is that a nod to the TMP design, I see?
terrywest111 9 months ago
@terrywest111 Yeah, agree on all counts there. The only thing I wish were different is the space between the nacelles. I'm pleased otherwise.
I did like seeing that the put the torpedo bay at the base of the neck like the TMP refit instead of firing from the saucer somewhere.
finalfrontier1701 9 months ago
Bleah! The original Enterprise (refit in Star trek II) is better!
TheFazza64 11 months ago
@TheFazza64 Don't like the original Enterprise refit in Star Trek 1?
finalfrontier1701 9 months ago
the music is EPIC!
zhengkaizhong 11 months ago 2
@zhengkaizhong Enterprising Young Men is the score playing.
Treize132 10 months ago
if you pause at 0:21, you can see the Enterprise at the top right of your screen :)
MarblesStudios 1 year ago
is there ANYONE else who can put a better vid of this scene on YouTube?
neoanakinpotter 1 year ago 29
@neoanakinpotter
Maybe you?
shop99er 1 year ago
@neoanakinpotter No too many flares. XD
Idazmi7 6 months ago