Added: 4 years ago
From: NationalGeographic
Views: 531,582
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6,010)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Not true all lies...

  • Comment removed

  • Is that Alec Baldwin?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • National Geographic why don't you mention that submarine sonar kills many whales, dolphins and many other fish...you know all those beached whales in numbers? Thank our overzealous war machine govt.

  • @muttkat1 I agree. We are destroying the animals and the earth in many ways, not just by heating up the atmosphere with fossil fuels. It's a shame at this point in our history we are still so ignorant.

  • @muttkat1

    Yes ant those birds of prey and the poor bats with ruptured lungs as they fly near them tainted wind turdbines ~ great solution for no pollution.

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..Nature Journal edition:

    (Please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts is allowed to censor it)..

    .

    Thawing permafrost reduces river runoff

    .

    Chinese researchers have revealed that the amount of water entering the Yangtze River near its source on the Tibetan plateau has fallen by 15% over the past four decades, despite a 15% increase in glacial melt and increased rainfall over the same period.

    .

    Nature

    7 January 2012

  • Total fiction like all the IPCC scenarios.

    DRAMA QUEENS!

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (please read article before this denier oil TROLL with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Climate change blamed for decline of tuna catch.

    .

    The decline in tuna catch worldwide for the last three years is attributed to climate change and other environmental factors, a Filipino official said Monday.

    .

    Davao SunStar, Philippines

    3 January 2012

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series

    (please read article before this denier oil TROLL with all the sock puppet accounts censors it).

    .

    A warmer and wetter new 'normal' for Alaska weather. Think Alaska has been warmer than normal?

    .

    You just might be right. But whether that wee simmer offers regional evidence for global warming is a complicated issue, hinging on semantics, starting dates and one somewhat inconvenient question: Warmer than what?

    .

    Anchorage Alaska Dispatch

    2 Jan 2012

  • If the wrold becomes 6 degrees warmer, we'll have to turn up our AC's. Temperatures change up to 50 degrees through out the year.

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..We're already at this point edition:

    (Please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Mild weather redefines winter landscape

    .

    At the National Arboretum, the white petals of snowdrops — normally an early spring flower — have unfurled. In Maine’s Acadia National Park, lakes still have patches of open water instead of being frozen solid.

    .

    Washington Post

    31 December 2011

  • Six Degrees... Like 666?

  • Whatever u do DO NOT press 4 over and over o.o

  • @kirani111 ?

  • really? nothin' happened? :@ tht weird

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series...(please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    The Durban Deal was done, but what next?

    .

    Businesses will have to plan for an increased focus on climate adaptation and resilience over the coming decades. Meanwhile, we will all have to hope that technologists can deliver a breakthrough that can remove carbon emissions from the atmosphere.

    .

    London Business Green, UK

    Opinion, 20 Dec 2011

  • Huhh smh...where should i start? I have received a bachelors in physics and now on my masters in solar physics. Listen guys, you want to know the truth from a 24 year old scientist who's been studying this for the past 7 years and, in $30,000 in debt of college loans, living in a one room apartment in northern California? CO2 is a product of temperature change. Hate to burst your bubble, but it not caused by humans, its sun spots. Call me a "denier", but I've studied this, unlike yourself.

  • ... Do you honestly, seriously think that what studying you have done topples the vast monopoly of study that countless climatologists, chemists, and a variety of scientists have done over decades of experimentation and observation? Some of these scientists have studied this phenomena for their entire lifetime, unlike yourself. And to think people like you go to university...

  • @ObsessedXP

    Are you another DRAMA QUEEN?

    Do you believe in AGW and the IPCC disaster / catastropy /loony left stuff?

    DON'T WORRY cause IT AIN'T REAL!!!!

  • watch?v=Tn_CYPhpBrg

  • Cya in hell ässholes.. We deserve it

  • 0:55 lol probably not the best idea to try to ride your bike through that

  • The height of human arrogance is to think that we can go on living like we do now until forever. The Earth will change, and we must change with it.

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Ever-worsening weather events lead to inescapable verdict on climate change

    .

    After another year of extreme weather events, including October’s flooding in the Dublin area, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has warned global warming will cause even stronger storms, more heatwaves, droughts and wildfires unless steps are taken to curb the current trends.

    .

    Dublin Irish Times, Ireland

    28 November 2011

  • Thank you al gore for getting rich off of stupid sheep

    why havent you been out there lately? Buying another mansion in Santa Barbara?

  • @GWnut1954 congrats, you are a fucking retard.

  • @GWnut1954

    Since when has buying houses in Santa Barbara been a crime?

    What is it you RepubLIE-CONS keep saying about the politics of envy?

  • classic play on emotion... trying to attract believers by using pretty videos... funny how they didnt mention any of the science behind this, did they?

  • @leaualorin Do you even know anything at all about the subject? Have you ever even looked at a single source of information, asshole? Climate change has nothing to do with the sun, it is driven by the temperature changes in the atmosphere caused by greenhouse gases. And it's spelled "liar", not "lier", dumbass.

  • @FlyingPotatoChickens you just owned hiim well done haha. if he doesnt understand, global warming is also happening because of the excess amounts of CARS and SMOKE and shet like that being emitted into the atmosphere. these are not natural elements thus it causes an imbalace in the temperature making it harmful for the earth.

  • THANK you Al Gore, for raising awareness about climate change. ;)

  • @Nightversionn do some research before u believe in someone...notice the owner of the weather network is suing al gore

  • Im scared LOL

  • URproductions Yeah..all the world's climate scientists are into "propaganda", not science.. Moron! By the way, what's the point of this world-wide "propaganda", to take american conspiracy freaks' tax-money? Or maybe take their tin-foil hats away or maybe tax the tin-foil hats?

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series…

    .

    When to move species struggling with climate change

    .

    As climate changes make native habitats unlivable to plants and animals, these species have two choices: Leave or go extinct.

    Now, researchers are offering guidance on when conservationists should undertake the last-ditch strategy of transplanting struggling species to new habitats.

    .

    LiveScience

    25 July 2011

  • National Geographic, for all the respect I have for you, I'm disappointed you're buying into the propaganda.

  • doom sayer you. enviro terrorist say i

  • Wait wait wait.. 6 degrees Celsius or Fahrenheit? Because that makes A LOT of difference.

  • This is scary.

  • How old is this program on their flooded NYC you can see the towers clearly...

  • no matter what we do we cannot beat nature... END OF STORY... the earth has survived to much to be influenced by the 3% carbon dioxplantlifeide in the atmosphere where water vapour (clouds) are 95% of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

    do some study on climate sensitivity you fools

  • die, bitches, DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE!!!!

  • @orangon Did you know that one large solar power station in Arizona could power all of USA's mainland? There is only on reason why America hasn't gone green a long time ago, and that's money. For a long time it has been much cheaper to use fossil fuels, so of course America wouldn't suddenly go green. It has to be cheaper for you to use green energy. In Denmark, both a happier and richer country pr cap. than USA, 20% of the energy comes from windmills. We even have whole self-sufficient islands.

  • @taba3000 don't be an idiot.

  • @OUTOFGAS88 You're totally right. I'm an idiot to think that an American could understand.

    In 2008 the USA released 5.46 million tons of Carbon Dioxide, 1.3 million tons more than the whole European Union combined.

    At both COP15 (Copenhagen, Denmark) and COP16 USA ruined the chance of reaching a global climate agreement.

    In Denmark we care about our nature. In the US you care about oil.

    You think the US is the best place to live in the world? Go ahead...

    We care. You call people idiots.

  • @taba3000 the point is it does'nt matter where you live humane activity is destroying life on this planet.

  • @OUTOFGAS88 That's not my point, but yes, it's true.

    Human activity almost kills 5 known species a day.Luckily of these 5, 2 are saved by humans bringing the total extinction a day to "only" 3 animal species. So no, my point is not that it doesn't matter where you live. My point is that some people destroy the world, while others are fighting to save it.

    American as you are, you avoid commenting the fact that Americans releases far more green house gasses than other peoples by capita.

  • @taba3000

    You seem to forget the EU is far more connected than the US. Your cities are very close to one another.

    However, the US is very very large, and spread out. Hence we emit more tons of Carbon Dioxide.

    Our apologies.

  • @smartwarlord You are totally right, but the US has about twice the total area of EU and only 3/5ths of its population. The spreading does make up for a lot of the total energy use, but not enough. If you double the spreading and almost half the population, you should get about the same result. Even when compared to total area spreading America ranks very high in carbon dioxide emissions. It's unnecessary to use 4WD's to drive around your family. Is your kids' school located in a swamp or what?

  • @taba3000

    Why do horticulturalists boost Carbon Dioxide levels in their greenhouses?

    Oh yes its because CO2 is a natural fertiliser and therefore increases the lushness of the biosphere which promotes animal survival including humans.

  • @PrairleDogged Yes... What's your point?

    We are releasing extreme amounts of Carbon Dioxide, and at the same time we are cutting down the rainforests, which, by the way, has been referred to as the lungs of the Earth. Also the increasing temperature both destroys coral reefs and creates extreme droughts and floodings at places where these are very rarely seen, which again destroys natural sites. If your point is that we are helping nature by releasing Carbon Dioxide, I'm gonna have to disagree.

  • @taba3000

    Does life like warmth or cold? think about where the greatest biodiversity is found?

    Coral reefs? don't see many of them in Antarctica do you?

    .

    Rainforest destruction is not CO2 burning issue so do not lump that into your sales pitch.

    .

    So I am gonna have to disagree with you.

  • @PrairleDogged How come rainforest destruction suddenly doesn't have anything to do with CO2 emissions? Didn't you just assure me that CO2 was good for nature? Well, it is... If there are any nature left.

    You seem to think that someday the warming will just stop leaving Antarctica tropical. However, what's threatening nature is the rapid decline in the amount of coral reefs. Do you even know how much of the life in oceans is directly depending on the biodiversity of coral reefs?

  • @taba3000

    Coral reefs like warmth NOT cold !!!

    Google cold kills Coral you will see how the recent cold weather bleached Coral reefs a natural occurrence that has happened since the beginning of time ~ Also Google NASA 'Greening Earth' where you will see the Northern Hemisphere has greened up over the last few decades ~ now is that not good for the planet? or does that biomass not constitute "Lungs of the Earth" ???

    . Warmth plus CO2 = Growth

    CO2 depletion + cold = Starvation

  • @PrairleDogged First of all a change of just a few degrees will totally change the coral reefs whether it gets colder or warmer. Second of all a global change in temperature wil totally change the ocean currents leading cold water to coral reefs and stopping warm water from getting to a coral reef in cold regions. That will result in most coral reefs to die instantly, however it takes thousands of years for a new reef to form. We are gradually changing the oceans into underwater deserts.

  • @taba3000

    Do you realise just how little the instrumental record has indicated temperatures and sea levels have risen?

    Do you realise temperatures have been higher in recent history than the present?

    Do you ever question what you are told?

  • @PrairleDogged

    Do you realize that satellite measurements has indicated a sea level rise of 3,2 mm pr. year since 1993? (Well, to be fair, other measurements only indicate an annual rise of 3,1 mm)

    Do you realize that measurements indicate a rise in temperature of 0,8 degrees C since records began?

    Do you realize that sudden temperature rises in history always have been followed by mass extinction?

    Do you realize that maybe those stupid Harvard guys could actually be telling the truth?

  • @taba3000

    Er satellite measured a 5-6mm drop in sea levels in 2010 and 2011 this was due to what?

    .

    Do you think 0.8 Deg C in 150 years is "sudden" ?

    .

    Do you totally ignore Paleo/Empirical evidence that kicks seven shades out of the modern instrumental broken record?

  • @PrairleDogged If you knew your facts, you would know that the temperature rise are compared to the decade 1900-1910. 0.8 degrees C is sudden, as the fastest known global temperature rise was about 10 degrees C in 10.000 years. We now have a temperature rise equal to 8 degrees in 1.000 years, which is eight times as fast. That is sudden.

    By the way all known global temperature rises in history comparable to the recent has been followed by an ice age. As you said, nature likes warmth not cold...

  • @PrairleDogged

    news.yahoo.com/biggest-jump-ev­er-seen-global-warming-gases-1­83955211.html

    You tell me. And those same guys you are telling us not to trust are ALSO the guys who did the climate data to which you are referring to. So you just gave a decent argument, and then completely ruined it by saying we shouldn't trust them.

  • @flavorysoup

    CO2 on the increase? great that will Green our planet as NASA satellite imagery has shown ~ thus giving life and Oxygen for the ever increasing population ~ the flipside less CO2 would be grim.

    I am unsure about you posts intent? do you think that all scientists and their studies are either correct or corrupt?

    I trust no scientists 100% their studies are only surface scratching and any one of them can be overturned at any time ( Einstein for example ) if the CERN test is validated.

  • @PrairleDogged wow, now I see the extent of this conversation. I didn't actually bother to look at the entire thing because it was all scattered. And it is a popular theory that a change of 6 degrees within the course of a century would cause a mass extinction. The evidence for this is found in the past. Ice cylinders/soil cylinders have been recovered showing that at any time that a sudden increase in temperature happened, there is a massive reaction. An example would be an Ice Age.

  • @PrairleDogged That would be true, except this change in CO2 level increases the temperature suddenly. Suddenly as in within a century. The last time that happened there was a ice age, that contributed to a mass extinction across the planet. The 'Cambrian explosion' was introduced within a time span of more than a hundred million years, which allowed organisms time to evolve for the difference in climate. Bit of a difference between 100 years and 100 million.

  • @flavorysoup

    This CO2 level increases temperature suddenly?

    What evidence is there for that? the snow the increase in ice mass in Antarctica? the Glaciers that are growing? ( I know many are receding )

    There is plenty of evidence that recent past temperatures were higher than the present and there was no mass extinction ~ so why the Armageddon scenario now??

  • @taba3000 I am sorry to say that I am an american, but I try to be as eco friendly as I can. I respect Denmark very much for its efforts. Right now I'm living in Holland so I ride bikes everywhere. And don't people see that eco friendly energy saves money in the long run! You don't have to keep building new oil rigs or mining for more coal. Silly people, they can't see a good solution when it's staring them in the face.

  • @flavorysoup

    I applaud your eco friendly existence ~ I am really impressed on the bike ride from America to Holland that must have been an epic journey ~ I salute you ;-)

  • @PrairleDogged I rode on Michael Felps back.

  • If carbon were taxed sufficiently, then carbon free sources of energy would be the cheapest.

  • That's really scary. I wish more people thought about how their littlest action can hugely affect the planet!

  • if the world indeed heats up as much as that, the greenland ice sheets would melt completely, causing the Thermohaline circulation belt that brings warm waters to europe to stop running which would cause a cooling in europe causing another ice age, causing more ice to reflect sunlight and then we are back to the beginning where the ice didnt melt :D

  • During to the possible and logical predictions, if the world rises by six degrees, we should experience a massive climate change, sea level change, habitable areas change, sea poisonous change, agricultural change, ice cap change, tempreture change, landscape change, eco-system change and food chain change. Hopefully, only hopefully we will never have to answer this question: What to do if the tempreture rises by 6 degrees Celcius?

  • @orangon

    What could the US could gain from hoaxing global warming? After all they keeps the hoax going. But why? If it's a hoax, they must have some kind of reason. Increasing the value of oil? No, that gains the Middle East well. Saving energy? No, suddenly there are no reasons for us to save energy, because it really doesn't matter in global warming. Green technology? No, most green technology is invented outside the US helping other countries' national economies. Please tell me why?

  • @orangon

    It's really hard to think of you as a serious person. Especially when you state that global warming DOES exist - then end your comment with the words "No Global Warmning".

    Everyone knows that global warming also exists in nature. Why else would Scandinavia and Canada be temperated since the last ice age?

    However, saying that humanity has absolutely nothing to do with the current and very fast global warming is just ignorant. Have you seen a satellite image of the earth at night?

  • @orangon

    If you light a candle, you release far more CO2 than you would if you just put on your electric lights. You really do seem to know your facts about global warming.

  • 0:55 WTF???

  • yay humans are going to die as they deserve!

  • @IansProdDeluxe that is the most hypocritical comment i've ever seen ....you do know you are a human being

  • @IansProdDeluxe

    You're right. Of course human extinction is not our favourite ending, but it would probably solve a lot of problems. Because of humans 3 animal species are extincted everyday. I once watched a documentary named "Life after people", which really shows an utopic scenario without any humans left.

  • @taba3000 after you fool

  • @Gilgamesh2020 Fool?! xD

    Mature as you are, I think you misunderstood. I don't want humanity to end, but there are no doubt that it would be the best solution for many of the eco systems in the world. However, in the future humans might help the environments at last, which I (surprisingly) would prefer rather than human extinction.

    But then again... We are just people repeatingly calling each other fools. Maybe humanity really is good for nothing? Some people definately are.

  • @taba3000 Indeed, we humans "Currently" are not good for the earth, we will need to advance technologically in green technology, to gain fossil fuel independence, and adapt vertical farming. But its only a mater of time until the next mass extinction, perhaps the next 6-7 mile wide asteroid impact, or comet, it will be up to us to protect the majority of the Earth's ecosystems from the catastrophic event when the time comes.

  • @curingaging00 I totally agree. Overall humans might end up being Earth's last hope, but until now we have destroyed far more, than we have saved.

  • Why is the top comment on these vids some stupid lecture from a guy who dis agrees with the vid. WHY FUCKING WATCH IT THEN?

  • Is that Alec Baldwin? God I fucking hate that guy.

    

  • Co2 in cans hmmm. Well where did they gat that??? The air itself maybe???

  • Hey guys, I just thought of something.

    This whole global warming deal. If the sun expands (like any star does), wouldn't that raise the temperature here on earth ?

  • @ToxinalX well der

  • Go to the iceagenowdotcom site and you will find out info that isn't bullshit.

    Underwater volcanoes heating Antarctic waters

    Newly discovered volcanoes almost two miles tall

    

  • holy shit that guy on the bike is definitely dead.

  • You know ... you would be more believable if you actually start producing verfiable and verified scientific reports to back any claim you are making. Why don't you start doing so?

  • to produce more and more heat as it expands toward the end of its lifecycle and get closer and closer to the earth until one day it will engulf the earth, trying to change anything especially via socio political methods let alone any other futile effort of any sort, is pointless, and im afraid that you need to realise that the only rational people in this world are the ones that live for the now, pretending that we can reduce the suns effect or increase the suns effects is idiotic

  • @flutch02 More bla bla without references.

    And you are not even willing to produce your source of the claim that the antarctic ice is growing.

    A claim opposite from the NASA reports.

    If you are not even willing to back your claims with the necessary science and you are not countering your incorrect claim of the antarctic ice growing than why should anybody believe you?

    Your prettty blue eyes?

    Or what?

  • irelevant in any case, all geologists i have contacted agree that there is not necessity involving Antarctic or Arctic ice, in historical relevance to life on earth, the same opinion is expressly shared by the marine biologists and biologists i have spoken with, which is many from quite a few highly remarked institutes, whether the ice melts or not is irrelevant in any case, further more all things are irrelevant as regardless of any efforts on behalf of man the sun is going to continue

  • @flutch02.

    .

    "...whether the ice melts or not is irrelevant..."

    .

    That is odd! If so than why did you ever bother to mention it! You started by claiming that there is a source that says that the antarctic ice is shrinking. NASA disagrees with you. As specified in my source listing. And I repeat the source listing:

    tinyurl*com/yalhkuj

    Why should I trust your sources if you don't reference them? Just remember, NASA represents scientists plural! And NASA has a scientific reputation to uphold.

  • is*

  • You dont need the global temperature to rise by 6 degrees to cause mass extinction, all you need is man-made-global-warming-alarmi­sts to get everybody paying carbon taxes to genocidal maniacs, General Electric in charge of designing power-plants like Fukushima, a bunch of wealthy financial terrorists who are ruthlessly evil pychopaths running a mock with all the worlds politicians in their pockets, & some very sick individuals who preach depopulation.

  • @Galv140577 This is called spoiling the well. A well lnown fallacy. Moving on...

  • Global warming and Global cooling is just natural events caused by the sun regardless of how human beings act on this planet. You think somehow we are going to be able to regulate the sun tempurature, WHAT? Are these people fucking kidding me?..

    Global Warming and Global cooling will always exist, and it's not a human phenomenon. Never trust stupid environmental politicians that don't know anything about the planet earth.

  • @DanielSeriously smarter words were never spoken except by me lol

  • @DanielSeriously humans are warming up earth in unnatrual way. If you are saying the sun is warming up earth, then Mars will start to look different and yet there are no signs of Mars tempreture changing.

  • @DanielSeriously

    Oh my god, I just can't believe that there are still people out there trying to justify human activities claiming that global warming is a natural occuring phenomenon. It is, but 0,8 degree C temperature rise in less than a century is NOT natural. The facts are:

    CO2 and Methane is proven to have a heatening effect.

    The sun is proven to have a heating effect.

    Humans release CO2 and Methane.

    Humans can not help heating from the sun.

    Humans CAN stop releasing green house gasses.

  • @taba3000 This.

  • @taba3000 cows release far more co2 and methane then all the worlds combined jets, volcanoes produce more pollution then all the worlds polluting sources, the world will naturaly destroy its self then humans will

  • in any case, regardless of this twats beliefs,. and i say again BELIEFS, the facts remain that there is no warming in the southern hemisphere and Antarctica has more ice now than 10 years ago, if this idiot really thinks that there is only land in the northern hemisphere ergo all weather trends in the northern hemisphere are global, then there really is no hope for him/her. i have my own conclusive evidence recorded over 5 years that there is a 0.2 degree decrease in temperature in my location

  • also do some real research and see that without mass genocide or eugenics (one in the same really) there is no way to live green, all green tech is redundant on a large scale beyond household use (where it is still incredibly restrictive and inconvenient especially to those with medical or special needs) at the very best green tech could reduce the need for more polluting methods by perhaps 15% and that is being generous, that doesn't change much if any of our industrial output so give up

  • AGW Psuhing is the new nutjob religion, more than 90% of these people blindly follow a political religious movement we all know as environmentalism a movement that has long been nothing but a bunch of ignoramuses tricked into thinking its their cause that they are taking up against the man, but where do they get all their data? the same political structure they oppose, lol they are the blind being led by the agenda of those whom will profit from the futile "green" industry, lol failures at life

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Saving the earth, or hurting it?

    .

    Geoengineering: It's our last resort and might buy us time, supporters say. It's delusional lunacy and could ruin our planet, opponents counter.

    .

    Charlotte Observer North Carolina

    10 May 2010

  • The global temperature fluctuates periodically over long periods of time. The current trend of gradual warming should be welcomed as the majority of time in our history temperatures were consistently much colder and will be so again one day. It is ironically both arrogant and naive to believe that humans have any noticeable impact on global temperatures. Indeed the major periods of industrialisation in recent history have coincided with periods of cooling. And still we hear all this nonsense.

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    No alternative to adaptation to climate change: Experts

    .

    Experts and environmentalists say there is no alternative to adapting to the impacts of climate change and cutting greenhouse gas emissions, because the existence of the people of Bangladesh is at risk.

    .

    Bangladesh Sangbad Shangstha

    28 August 2011

  • Lot's of denier troll comments I see. Nevertheless climate change is happening, it's being caused by human activity, and I wish denier trolls were right and could change it but they can't. Unfortunately

  • LIES-Remember how Ross Perot said NAFTA and GATT was going to create a "Giant Sucking Sound" and all US JOBS will be gone-Al (the Gangster) GORE laughed at Ross Perot-But do you see any JOBS left in America Now-Don't Get Fooled Again-Vote for RON PAUL or starve in a FEMA Prison Camp.

  • Anyone that cant sit down take a breath and realise that what they breathe out is not toxic must have a real hard time existing in daily life. CO2 is no more toxic than oxygen or any other element or gas essential to life on earth, only completely incompetent politically driven ignoramuses allow themselves to believe the garbage these videos spew forth, there is nothing humans could ever do to change climate on any measurable scale much less to endanger the existence of life, i suggest reading k

  • @flutch02 You're right on the bit where CO2 isn't "toxic", I'd be happy to slap anyone that said it was... It does do a pretty good job at trapping heat though. You'd have to be pretty ignorant to be able to ignore the fact that the temperature of the Earth is rising almost identically to the CO2 and CH4 levels in the atmosphere.

  • @tahlialouise1

    no you have to be extremely ignorant to think that mans contribution is changing anything, 5 volcanoes have been erupting for the bulk of this year this alone has released more greenhouse gas into the atmosphere than man has ever and could ever produce, so explain to me where we begin to affect things? and NO the earths temperature is not rising, infact the southern hemisphere is cooling has been for over 12 years says every credible scientists. so explain that?

  • @flutch02,

    .

    "5 volcanoes have been erupting for the bulk of this year this alone has released more greenhouse gas into the atmosphere than man has ever and could ever produce"

    .

    Which 5?

    Which greenhouse gasses?

    What were the concentrations?

    Show me the peer reviewed and linkable scientific paper backing your claims.

    .

    By now you probably have noticed how easy it is to cut&paste.

  • @wimahlers

    show me a peer reviewed journal that discredits me! fact u cant, so deal with it, your argument for this theory and i re-iterate THEORY, is the most ridiculous religious load of "blind leading the faithful" i have ever seen, hell extremist Muslims and Christians whatever else have a better argument for their behaviour than you nutjobs, fact is you dont even realise that more than all the institutes you put good faith in make this shit up, its not even worth getting into lol

  • @flutch02,

    .

    "show me a peer reviewed journal that discredits me! "

    .

    show me a peer reviewed journal that discredits the existence of fairies! fact u cant.

    Meaning, I don't have to discredit anything you said. As you don't have to discredit the existence of fairies.

    If I claim fairies exists it is my responsibility, and mine alone, to provide POSITIVE proof.

    As it is your responsibility, and yours alone, to provide POSTIVE proof for your claim.

    So try again...

  • @wimahlers

    it was a piss take at you morons that have faith in "peer review" lets say i draft a journal/report, you really think i am going to risk my tenure/funding by sending it to people who will strongly disagree with my findings? you seriously think i would let it land in the hands of someone who would use facts to discredit my claims? NO of course NOT, peer review is a failed system it is by no definition a measure of accuracy for a report to be "peer reviewed" all a load of shit